Banner Advertiser

Friday, September 21, 2007

Re: [ALOCHONA] Re: Prothom -alo Cartoon and few words

"Certainly this innocent cartoon was nowhere near the Taslima Nasreen
writings or Rushdie's Satanic Verses"
 
Nayabangla, I am tempted to say that you haven't read neither Taslima Nasreen's work, nor Satanic Verses. If I could, I would give Salman Rushdie a Pulitzer for writing Satanic Verses. The idiotic mass completely misses the story of the Satanic Verses.

 
On 9/20/07, nayabangla <nayabangla@yahoo.com> wrote:

After the outcry from the mollahs, I asked a friend who keeps
Prothom Alo, to show me the cartoon, and found it only mildly
amusing, and certainly not offensive. It is more or less like what
Mr. Adnan has described above, an inappropriate use of the name
Mohammad by a little kid confused by an overzealous moulvi saheb. It
reminded me of my student days abroad when I was told by a
Bangladeshi colleague doing research in the same institution, that
he felt embarrassed when his English colleagues called him by his
first name - Mohammad, which of course we never use except in
official documents. I advised him as a joke to ask his colleagues
also to say 'sallallahu alaihe wa sallam' after his name, as it was
the name of the Prophet and there is a Muslim custom of saying that
dorud whenever the Prophet's name was uttered. Our mollahs should
think about the cases of Fida Hossain , the Indian artist, creating
a problem in India by painting some Devis naked. Most Hindus quickly
came to his defense against a similar opportunistic outcry from BJP
and other fundamentalists. In the West films like Jesus Christ
Superstar, or the Last Temptation of Christ, which were less than
reverent, hit the box office.

Certainly this innocent cartoon was nowhere near the Taslima Nasreen
writings or Rushdie's Satanic Verses, or the Danish cartoons,
against which the question of deliberate attempt to incite might be
validly raised. I am quite sure this young cartoonist had absolutely
no idea it would land him in jail during this pro-Jamaat regime. The
latest news is the banning of the Eid issue of Saptahik 2000, where
a short story very similar to Humayun Azad's 'Pak sar zamin shaad
baad' was published. The principal character was unnecessarily
named Moulana Delwar Hossain. That must have incurred the wrath of
Mainul Hosein - the Jamaati in the government.

About our beloved Matiur Rahman - the Edior of Prothom Alo, friend
of the present government, I will say nothing. All Magsaysay Prizes
are rewards for serices to the West. Well, the Americans are known
to shoot down their own men too, sometimes.




--
Cyrus Zulkarnaïan Kazi
(917) 770 - 4687 __._,_.___

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Editor Prothom Alo's Surrender

Mr Motiur Rahman yesterday surrendered to the Khatib of Baitul Mukkaram Mosque.

He begged his pardon by touching Khatib's hands and pronouncing "Toaba". However, that particular picture or narration of the episode has not been published in Prothom Alo.
 
Many of the Alochoks have a view of him a promoter of freedom of speech and a crusader against corruption. Unfortunately those who do not know him, can easily arrive to such a consclusion. In the last, Mr Motiur Rahman maintained strong ties with BNP-Jamat coalition. During the first BNP-Jamat government in 1991, his name was proposed to be Ambassador ofBangladesh to Turkey. He relentlessly lobbied for that post. He used to visit the then foreign Minister, Col. Mustafizur Rahman. However, eventually he was dropped. He was a regular visitor to infamous Hawa Bhaban to see Tarique Rahman.
 
It is very much well known in the Dhaka,s journalist circle that he lobbies for the military contractors in Sena Sadar.
 
We should should be careful about this type of tigers who are wearing sheep's skin.


Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. __._,_.___

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Sentiment That Dies Hard [on cartoon controversy]

                       Sentiment That Dies Hard
 

 

"Human being is not born with any religion or religious sentiment; but upon birth the religion (or religious sentiment) of his/her family becomes proactive on him/her and s/he is included in the religious circle of the family. Father-mother, relatives, surrounding, religious rituals, from school to university, textbooks, newspapers and the state instills upon his/her mind religion and religious sentiment; guard him/her like a cop; replacing creativity, cultivates irrationality in his/her mind. If the religion s/he belongs to happens to be a religion sponsored by the state, then his/her religious sentiment becomes acuter day by day."

-Humayun Azad,*1 Bengali author/linguist/critic  

 

1. Let me share a small childhood anecdote with the readers. In our village we had a friend named Malek. One holiday in the afternoon I went to Malek's house and was calling him by his name aloud from outside his house. Malek's uncle, an elderly man in his 70s, came out, saw me and then came nearer me telling," Don't call someone just Malek. It's a sin and you know why?" I acknowledged my ignorance. "Malek is one of the hundred sacred names by which the Almighty Allah is called. Hence, it's sinful to utter the name in truncated form. You should, rather, say, 'Abdul Malek.'"

I see that as an isolated incident which happened many years ago; Islam was not yet declared the state religion of Bangladesh. Majority of people were Muslims as they are today; Bangladesh was not then a breeding ground of the Taliban-inspired radical political Islamists. But it seems to me (I am sure I am not alone in this thought) now, we have come to a stage where I believe even the above-narrated circumstance with little twist and turn would be enough to put someone to jail without bail in today's Bangladesh. At least that's what I have been thinking after reading news about the arrest of young cartoonist Arifur Rahman of daily Prothom Alo and so called controversy surrounding his otherwise plainly-intended cartoon*2.

 

2. In the satirical supplement (Aalpin) of daily Prothom Alo, cartoonist Arif has drawn a small cartoon with a brief conversation between a small boy and an elderly bearded Muslim man (or, someone popularly called Hujoor/Maolana in Bengali Muslim culture) where the cartoonist tried to invoke some laughter in reader's mind using the word Muhammad. Unless someone has a predilection (like our current Law and Information adviser Mr Mainul Hussain) to see signs of devil's conspiracy in every little things in this world, any one reading the cartoon would understand that the cartoonist cracked a joke purely in a cultural context. Much like the words Ram, Narayan, Jagannath, Ishwar or in English Matthew, Luke, John--the word Muhammad, regardless of its historic affiliation, is also a common name in almost all predominantly Muslim societies. Bangladesh is no exception. Thus picking up a common name to invoke some fun in readers mind cannot be a crime for a cartoonist! Let me give another example. In USA, people are usually called by their first name. Many Bangladeshi (and other) Muslims living in USA are officially called Mohammad as this is what their first name is. Let's assume one such Muhammad is very handsome, hero-like. During informal conversation it is not unusual for an American colleague, or friend to tease Muhammad and say things like "Muhammad, man, you are a lady killer!" Will it amount to an insult to the prophet Muhammad of the religion Islam? Well, none but a blockhead will think, it will. But unfortunately, even in twenty first century we have Bangladesh where just a small threat from the Taliban-inspired Islamic fundamentalists and the government sympathetic to them is enough to bring together editors of country's almost all leading newspapers to kneel down before Mullahs and apologize to them for hurting people's (or Mullah's?) religious sentiments. What a disgrace!

 

3. Some readers believe- as a mainstream and "pro-democracy" daily, Prothom Alo had been fundamentalist gang's target for long time (one possible reason could be publishing investigative series reports about the activity of militant Islamists, Bangla Bhai and his Jamaat connection, etc) although many secular and freethinkers accuse Prothom Alo and its editor of being opportunistic and ideologically compromising in many instances. Fundamentalist gang has used cartoon issue just as a pretext to bring down Prothom Alo from the top of the list as the highly circulated daily. That's what some people I personally spoke to believe. They cited example that when similar cartoon in the magazine of Islami Chatra Shibir (radical student wing of Jamaat Islami Bangladesh) was published in 1998*3, it triggered no reaction from any fundamentalist or government authority.  

    

 

    Art, aesthetics, be it of any kind, is always an anathema to the eyes of fundamentalists. Of the many havocs caused by the Talibans upon seizing state power in Afghanistan during early 90s, one was total demolition of a thousand years old giant historical Bamiyan statue of Buddha. We were shocked but not surprised to hear that. We know what logic (!) worked in the minds of Taliban. It's very likely, Taliban could not tolerate and demolished Buddha statue because it hurt their religious sentiments. It hurt their chauvinistic and jingoist mindset. They celebrated its destruction. Similarly we saw how Hindu fanatics found pathetic pleasure in destroying a historic mosque of several hundred years in India. But we do not believe in destruction. We believe in creativity, humanism and positive growth. Hence we must resist these charlatans and their pretext of religious sentiments.  

            

__ __

New York
September 21, 2007
 

 

*1 "Dhormanubhutir Upokotha ebong Onyanyo"/Myth of Religious Sentiment and Others (The quote has been translated from Bangla – J.A.)
*2 http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=23700
*
3 http://www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/Shamim_Chowdhury/mullah_double_standard.htm

 

 

About the author: Jahed Ahmed is the co-moderator and editorial board member of Mukto-Mona (www.mukto-mona.com), a network of freethinkers and humanists from South Asian countries. He can be reached at worldcitizen73@yahoo.com

 

 

URL of above article:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/jahed/cartoon_sentiment.htm



Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on Yahoo! TV. __._,_.___

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com





SPONSORED LINKS
Dhaka bangladesh hotel Dhaka hotel bangladesh Call bangladesh
Bangladesh calling card Bangladesh flag

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] naam bivrat

NAAN BIVRAT


My first name is MOHAMMAD and so are the first names of my brothers.
I live in my away-from-home HOME in the US. And "naam-bivrat" is always troubling
for we all have the same first name name. In the US, individuals are customarily

   called by their first name!!


One should wonder, why the kings and hundreds of "sauds" in Saudi Arabia –
(supposed to be the standard bearer of Islam) are not always named with a
prefix "MOHAMMAD"? Well, may be they are better Muslims and need
no Islamic ornamentation of their names!!


I think, our government officials should think carefully before
succumbing to the pressures exerted by many mal-educated Mollahs.


It is not at all bad to have a rather scientific system of naming that
respects family lineage.

__._,_.___

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___