Re: [vinnomot] My mother passes away (inna ...rajiun)on 5th oct22 ramadan friday pls pray for eternal peace

Dear Aminul,

I know that it is a big shock for a man as a human being however you have to be passionate, I pray to Allah for your mother soul.

Sayeed   

"Md. Aminul Islam" <aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com> wrote:

Dear All,

           Assalamu Alaikum.my mother passes away on 5th oct, 22 ramadan 11.15 am.

she was 68.she was a very simple woman.in her ilness she always tryied to uttering the dorud sharif.she always tryied to help the poor and helpless.people.she was very simple in thinking.She was free from alltype of pride.

pls pray for the eternal peace of my mother.

 

aminul

---

Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.

---

Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha!
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. __._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] Re: [Dahuk]: My mother passes away (inna ...rajiun)on 5th oct22 ramadan friday pls pray for eternal peace

May Allah(swt) rest her soul in peace and grant her Jannah. She must
be a blessed lady, for her piousness, as she died in the holy month of
Ramadan.

Shamsul Huda

On 10/9/07, Md. Aminul Islam <aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
> Assalamu Alaikum.my mother passes away on 5th oct, 22 ramadan
> 11.15 am.
> she was 68.she was a very simple woman.in her ilness she always tryied to
> uttering the dorud sharif.she always tryied to help the poor and
> helpless.people.she was very simple in thinking.She was free from all type
> of pride.
> pls pray for the eternal peace of my mother.
>
> aminul
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha!
> Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo!
> Games.

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vinnomot/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vinnomot/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:vinnomot-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:vinnomot-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
vinnomot-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[vinnomot] JUSTIFICATION FOR BANNING FRONT ORGANIZATIONS OF POLITICAL PARTIES

http://www.ittefaq.com/get.php?d=07/10/10/w/n_zrvvmt

This is an article by Dr. Badiul Alam Majumdar published in today's Ittefaq. It reviews the constitutions of major political parties and shows that the front organizations are created to implement the programs of political parties rather than promoting the interests of students, teachers and workers. Thus in the national interest the front organizations should be banned.

Thanks, Roobon

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shushashoner Jonnoy Nagorik (SHUJAN)
3/7 Asad Avenue (2nd Floor)
Mohammadpur, Dhaka-1207
Bangladesh
ph: 8112622, 8127975 fx: 8116812
web: http://www.shujan.org __._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Manpower Export to Malaysia - Fleecing of workers rampant in both countries

Manpower Export to Malaysia

Fleecing of workers rampant in both countries

Porimol Palma

 

Unauthorized sub-agents in Bangladesh and outsourcing companies and their sub-agents in Malaysia have gobbled up an estimated amount of more than Tk 2,000 crore from about two lakh Bangladeshi workers in Malaysia, suggested a survey and statements of workers, sub-agents and businesses gathered by a Malaysian human rights organisation.

 

The Daily Star obtained a copy of the report.

 

Experts in the sector said a section of government officials of both the countries are also party to this unholy practice, which gave rise to a situation where a several thousand Bangladeshi workers were subject to abuse that led to an indefinite freeze by the Malaysian government on hiring workers from Bangladesh.

 

According to the decision of Malaysia and Bangladesh, each Bangladeshi worker is supposed to pay no more than Tk 84,000 to cover the costs including agents' service charges, government fees, fees for medical tests, and airfare, but they had to pay Tk 2 lakh to Tk 2.3 lakh each.

 

Malaysian human rights organisation, Tenaganita, in a statement signed by its Director Dr Irene Fernandez and issued in July this year, said apart from the official fees for visas, levies and attestations, outsourcing companies in Malaysia pay between 1,500 and 2,000 Malaysian Ringgit, equivalent to Tk 30,000 and Tk 40,000, in different forms to the Malaysian home ministry.

 

Tenaganita that prepared the statement on the basis of a survey on 150 jobless and stranded Bangladeshi workers and a study on 36 cases of the workers, said Malaysian outsourcing companies also spend between 1,000 and 2,000 Malaysian Ringgit, equivalent to Tk 20,000 and Tk 40,000, as 'lobbyist fee' to their sub-agents.

 

These companies sign deals with recruiting agencies in Bangladesh for hiring workers, as well as with employers in Malaysia for supplying the workers. The outsourcing companies, as per the Malaysian rules, are responsible for paying the salaries and ensuring other facilities for the workers upon receiving the money from the employers.

 

Tenaganita report is partly substantiated by a September 6, 2007 letter from Bangladesh expatriates' welfare and overseas employment ministry to the Bangladesh Association of International Recruiting Agencies (BAIRA), saying, "There are allegations that Bangladeshi recruiting agencies are paying levy to the Malaysian government in advance."

 

As per the Malaysian labour laws, Bangladeshi workers are supposed to pay the levy once they are employed in a Malaysian company, the letter said adding, "The levy is being paid twice as the recruiting agencies are paying it in advance during collecting job demand letters, while the employers are also cutting levy monthly from the workers' wages."

 

After Malaysia's decision on October 3 this year to freeze hiring of Bangladeshi workers, its Home Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Radzi Sheikh Ahmad said the presence of too many agents from Bangladesh in Malaysia, who used Malaysians as sub-agents, and the huge amount of money involved, are not healthy signs, it is not good for the country.

 

Back at home, unauthorised but widely spread-out middlemen eat up Tk 30,000 to Tk 40,000 per worker, as they woo the job seekers from villages to go to Malaysia and hand them over to licensed recruiting agencies.

 

During an investigation by an official of the Bureau of Manpower Employment and Training, Hamidul Haque, a manpower broker in Asrafpur of Meherpur, said he paid Tk 1.95 lakh to a recruiting agency for sending a worker to Malaysia.

 

That agency however handed over the worker to another recruiting agency, as the latter had a job demand letter which the former did not have, for processing the documents of the worker for sending him to a South East Asian country.

 

The unfortunate worker recently returned from Malaysia following unemployment and abuses by an outsourcing company there, and said he had paid Tk 2.3 lakh to the agency that had sent him there.

 

Curbing of such cuts of around Tk 30,000 to Tk 40,000 by the middlemen in Bangladesh, and Tk 50,000 to Tk 70,000 by the sub-agents or the Malaysian home ministry could have saved more than Tk 1 lakh for each Bangladeshi worker, said a recruiting agent of Bangladesh requesting anonymity.

 

An intelligence report at the end of last year said BAIRA President MAH Salim, who is also a former BNP lawmaker now in detention, monopolised the manpower business with Malaysia and charged an extra Tk 40,000 from each worker.

 

When contacted by The Daily Star in January this year for a separate report, MAH Salim said he had to pay 'lobbyist fees' and bribe officials in Malaysia.

 

On an occasion in mid-November Salim also said an erstwhile Bangladeshi minister had also demanded Tk 25 crore from him.

 

Salim's allegations against the said minister came up when the expatriates' welfare ministry in October last year asked the commerce ministry to suspend the executive committee of BAIRA following its alleged extortion of the workers. The committee is now suspended.

 

Malaysian human rights organisation, Tenganita, in its latest statement on October 4, 2007 said, "The outsourcing companies of Malaysia are very much linked with patronage politics in Malaysia where their goal is to make fast money."

 

On the other hand, an official of the Bangladesh expatriates' welfare ministry told this correspondent that the Bangladesh delegation, which recently visited Malaysia to probe the workers' issues, recommended changing a few officials of the Bangladesh High Commission in Kuala Lumpur.

 

There are allegations that the officials in the high commission were not careful enough in scrutinizing before attesting the job demand letters that resulted in unemployment of many workers, as they were hired to work in Malaysia based on fake demand letters.

 

---

Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. __._,_.___

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] Humanism and Psychology: (Comp 8): Human Memory

Understanding Ourselves and Our Universe: How Psychology Can Turn the "Mysteries of Human Nature" into Useful Tools for Self Improvement and Success in Life

 

Part  8: The Three-Store Model of Human Memory

s

When your brain leaps from forming only a few isolated connections  to forming a whole complex series of integrated connections, based not only on the unique qualities of that stimulus but also linking to all brain connections with qualities similar to that stimulus, you've made the leap from simple ideation (a single unique thought or memory) all the way to concept formation and conceptualization (integrated groups of thoughts or memories linked by common similarities)…… As was introduced earlier in this module, one's memory is absolutely indispensable to one's ability to normally perceive sensory information (as history is necessary for indispensable as memory of a nation). Without memory, one would be limited to genetically pre-programmed perceptual experiences, which are so simple as to make the world a meaningless place, just as History is the memory of a nation or country or humanity as a whole without with civilizaion cannot progress . If such an experience happened again, impoverished as it was, one would be incapable of recognizing it or communicating it to anyone else. However, what psychologists mean by memory is considerably different than the simple concept most people understand that term to mean. Human memory, once again in simplified form, has two basic functions: (1) to store coded information over time in unchanged form; and (2) to retrieve that information from storage when it's needed. A simple example is when we learn the answer ("Hobart") to a question ("What is the capital of Tasmania?"). We need to (1) store that answer correctly until we need it, and then (2) produce that answer when it's appropriate (and only when it's appropriate). Failure of either function means no memory. Compared to other animals, human memory is impressive, since we have the largest known memory capacity on earth. Compared to "perfection," however, we have remarkably inefficient memory systems, since very few memories are ever stored for significant periods of time without being changed to some degree, and too often we fail to retrieve needed memories as quickly and accurately as we'd like. ("What is Aunt Harriet's third husband's name?" "Tell me your phone number again?") So much, again, for that "image of a perfect maker" idea! Embedded within the neurophysiology of our sensory receptors, sensory transmitters, and our CNS there are three integrated but different memory functions. When stimulus information is first transduced and transmitted, the first memory store sensory memory (SM) begins to function. People who do not study psychology or human biology can live their whole lives unaware that they even have sensory memory, because it operates so quickly and automatically, and there is almost no way to make its functions conscious. In fact, in the ½-second or more it takes to concentrate on one's sensory memory, it has already finished its functions, or it has failed. Some people, however, occasionally report an almost instantaneous "sensory echo" to some stimuli, particularly with loud sounds or bright lights, which may well be sensory memory retrieval. Sensory memory's only function is to store a veridical (true, unprocessed) copy of a sensory stimulus called an icon (so raw and meaningless that we don't even call it "information" until it has undergone further processing), for approximately ¼-½ second. Any stimulus that attracts selective attention (i.e., on which we consciously or unconsciously focus our attention) goes on to short term memory. As we grow and develop, we supplement our basic genetically pre-programmed repertoire of salient stimuli (i.e., aspects of our environment that are adaptive to sense, like food odors when we're hungry or warmth when we're cold) by learning from experience what non-instinctive stimuli are adaptive to sense too (like money when we're poor or a friend's tone of voice indicating that they're upset). Sensory memory has a huge capacity; it can store a large number of stimuli simultaneously, but only for very short duration. If a sensory memory is not processed on within a second or two, it is lost forever, and we're never even aware that it was there. Thus, we routinely "sense" things with no sensory experience whatsoever to show for it. If we didn't have sensory memory, or if it routinely malfunctioned, we'd be stressed right into severe psychopathology due to being overstimulated by thousands of "important" but meaningless sensations every second of every day of our lives. Selective attention is a very important screening device to give our brains a manageable amount of sensory info to process at any one time. The tiny fraction of sensory memories that are selectively attended to are processed on into the second memory store, short term memory (STM). Unlike SM, we are well aware of our short term memory, and consciously use it every day to "hold information" we need to remember and/or want to use quickly. Note what you do the next time you're given a phone number; you'll "say it over and over to yourself" -- vocally or subvocally -- until you can use it or write it down for future reference. That is your STM at work. Short term memory is often called "working memory", because whenever we concentrate on something, in fact,  we're trying to remember it, we take this information from external stimuli or long term memory and "work on it" to bring it into STM. Unlike SM, STM lasts for approximately 15-30 seconds, but has a very small capacity (i.e., it can only store 7-9 different meaningful images at once). Just as stimulus icons are maintained or processed on into SM via selective attention, memory images in STM are maintained for longer periods of time and/or transferred into long term memory (LTM) by means of "rehearsal." There are two basic types of rehearsal that will successfully process STM images, but they differ enormously in their effect on our memory storage and how well we can retrieve that information later. Maintenance rehearsal is simply restimulating ourselves with the stimulus material over and over again (like rotely repeating a person's name or phone number several times in a row), but the long term memory image or engram it produces is a very singular, impoverished one, which is fairly easy to store (get into LTM) but quite difficult to retrieve (get out when we need to recall it). Maintenance rehearsal can form simple, one-to-one memories (like, "What is the capital of Tasmania? Hobart!"), but not the more complex memories that are more important to human IP. Elaborative rehearsal is the second means of processing STM images, but it produces much more easily stored engrams that are much easier to retrieve. Elaborative rehearsal means associating the new image with already learned information, and it can take many forms -- far too many to exhaustively review here. Three common methods of elaboration are to 1.  associate the new memory with similar, well-learned old memories (e.g, "Your name is Suggins? I have a favorite cousin named Suggins!") 2.  associate the new memory with other sensory images that are naturally and/or logically related to it (e.g., you won't forget the name of that delicious exotic fruit you tasted on vacation because you simultaneously learned its name along with its visual image, its taste, its smell, and its texture) 3.  synthesize novel sensory images into previously analyzed and learned groups of sub-images, which is called "chunking" (e.g., 11-digit long distance numbers would exceed our STM capacity for rehearsal if we didn't break it down into prefixes, area codes, and so on). If you remember phone numbers well, this chunking technique is why. The more thoroughly we learn something, the easier it is to chunk in the future. There are hundreds of "memory aid" systems (called mnemonics), any of which may help some people improve their memory for some kinds of information. But the three elaborative rehearsal techniques described above will always work for all normal people with all kinds of memories, because our brains and nervous systems are already genetically preprogrammed to receive, store, and retrieve information that way. (Yes, despite considerable everyday experience to the contrary, all people with an intact CNS organize, store, and retrieve their memories logically, because all normal brains are genetically organized in ways we call "logical." Sometimes people can and do behave illogically, but the reasons for that won't be addressed in this module.) STM memory information that is sufficiently rehearsed is processed on into the third memory store, long term memory (LTM). Very distinctively from either of the shorter memory brain range well into the trillions), and engram storage is also relatively permanent stores, LTM is extremely large in capacity (estimates of how many memory engrams can be stored in the human As was earlier stated, the two primary functions of LTM are to permanently store each memory in an unchanged form, and to efficiently retrieve that memory when it is needed. Most evidence indicates that engrams are stored associatively throughout most of the non-specialized areas of the brain. Just as selective attention is the key to successful processing through SM, and rehearsal is the key to successful processing through STM, categorization and organization by meaning seems to be the key to successful long term storage and retrieval in LTM. Recalling that new memory images enter the brain in the form of neural codes sent up the sensory transmission neurons from the sensory receptors, we can tentatively locate the three memory stores within the human CNS neurophysiology as follows: SM is likely a function of subcortical areas of the brain such as the thalamus STM is likely a cortical function of the brain's primary sensory reception and association areas (each of the 12 senses has its own genetically specialized sensory reception area in the brain) LTM is primarily a function of the cerebral cortex's general association areas (which are much larger, programmable areas spread throughout both of the two hemispheres and all four lobes of the brain) The point here is that when memory information enters the brain, the transmission neurons fire genetically pre-programmed groups of neurons called neural circuits. These circuits continue firing in the brain as long as rehearsal is going on. Each sensory reception circuit that fires will also fire at least one other sensory association circuit, depending on how the new material was rehearsed in STM. Rote rehearsal fires only a very few circuits -- perhaps only two (representing the memory image and the stimulus cue that came in with that image). For example, if you learn "Sally Smythe's phone number is 592-7654" by rote rehearsal, the only two LTM circuits that may be formed are "Sally Smythe's phone number" (the stimulus cue) and "592-7654" (the stimulus memory image). Two associated engrams = two sensory reception circuits + perhaps another two sensory association circuits = only 4 circuits altogether storing that new LTM memory. In the grand scheme of brain circuitry, that's a very tiny engram! (And as with some other human endeavors we can think of, size really is important here) If, instead, you learn exactly the same stimulus material by elaborative rehearsal in STM, a much larger number of sensory reception memory circuits are formed to store that material, as well as perhaps dozens of other sensory association circuits associated with those reception circuits. For example, using the three illustrative elaborations we used before, if when you STM rehearse Sally Smythe, you also picture how she looks, what her voice sounds like, and maybe what she was wearing and the aroma of the perfume she used (multisensory imaging), that's five sensory reception circuits formed for Sally Smythe, instead of just the one circuit with rote rehearsal. And if instead of just rotely rehearsing her phone number, you also chunk the prefix and last four numbers (using only two "slots" in STM instead of seven), and you note that 592 is the local prefix of other friends of yours, too, and that the 7654 numbers are in reverse sequence, and that you've previously memorized five other phone numbers that are in reverse sequence (associating the new material with logical patterns and also old memories), those elaborations will produce not two to four sensory reception circuits like rote rehearsal, but a total of 14 sensory reception circuits for the material you elaboratively rehearsed. Each of these 14 sensory reception circuits will in turn fire sensory association circuits with the same type of meaning, so those 14 circuits will associate with all your other LTM memory circuits for "pretty girls" and "clothes like Sally's" and "voices like Sally's" and "perfumes like Sally's" and "phone prefixes like Sally's" and "phone suffixes like Sally's", etc., etc. So just by elaborating on your STM rehearsal image, it would not be unusual to form dozens or even hundreds of associated circuits linked to "Sally's phone number is 592-7654" by common meanings. And that means that any one of the memories stored in all those circuits can be retrieved by stimulation of any other one of those circuits. When your brain leaps from forming only a few isolated circuits to forming a whole complex series of integrated circuits, based not only on the unique qualities of that stimulus but also linking to all brain circuits with qualities similar to that stimulus, you've made the leap from simple ideation (a single unique thought or memory) all the way to concept formation and conceptualization (integrated groups of thoughts or memories linked by common similarities). Likewise, the neurological organization underlying and operationally defining this huge difference in cognition has leaped from a few associated circuits to a whole complex of associated groups of circuits organized and linked by common meanings, called a neural network. To the immediate point, long term memories that are rotely rehearsed can only be retrieved by producing the stimulus cue with which they were associated when they were first learned. Thus, to retrieve the example's information, one would likely have to hear, "What is Sally Smythe's phone number?" in order to reliably retrieve the engram "592-7654". Otherwise, it would likely be "forgotten" if one just tried to recall it "cold", with no stimulus cues, "from memory." Elaboratively rehearsed engrams, however, can be retrieved using any of the learned elaborations, or using any of the other network associations formed in LTM. Thus, "pretty girls," "girls named Sally," or a whiff of Sally's perfume, or any reverse sequential phone number, or dialing up a friend with the 592 phone prefix, or seeing 592 on a license plate, etc., could all retrieve the memory of Sally Smythe's phone number. And every instance of recalling Sally's phone number, even when you're not trying to, constitutes another rehearsal, which makes that LTM engram even stronger; i.e., longer lasting, and better organized, and easier to retrieve. Such an external stimulus cue or internal idea that produces other memory associations (i.e., retrieves other memory engrams) is called a memory hook. Every hook that goes in with a new memory also provides a means for retrieving that memory, and the more hooks a memory forms in the brain, the faster and easier it will be to recall that memory when you need it. A final detail about how human memory works is the perhaps obvious one that not all long term memories are created equal. One method of classifying the qualitative differences in the "depth and breadth" of memories is the following four-type system: 1.  The least qualitative degree of memory is called relearning, and is so impoverished in content that one cannot even use that type of memory consciously. (It can only be demonstrated under lab conditions.) 2.  The second type is recognition: the ability to tell something familiar from something novel. (This is the basis of multiple-choice tests, by the way, and is a major reason such tests don't tell us much about learning!) 3.  The third type is recall, which is a simple one-to-one correspondence memory (what most of us commonly mean by the term "memory"). 4.  The fourth, and by far the most complex and complete form of memory is called redintegration. Redintegrative memories are multi-modal -- which means they involve several different senses -- and are heavily laden with emotions. Here are some examples of these four types of memory and one's high school prom: If you're taking a memory test in a lab, and you relearn a particular piece of music (that was played at your senior prom) significantly faster than totally novel music you've never heard before, that's relearning. (Note that if you were asked in advance if you'd ever heard that music before, you'd honestly answer, "No!") If you heard a different, better-remembered piece of music from your prom, but you couldn't remember what it was, or where you'd heard it before, that's recognition. If you heard a still better-remembered piece of music from your prom, and could say what it was, where you heard it, and maybe sing the words, that's recall. If someone just mentioned a still better-remembered piece of music from your prom, and you are suddenly "back at the prom" and can see and hear many aspects of the prom, and smell your date's cologne, and even "re-enjoy" the event, that's redintegrative memory. Routinely thinking and remembering using a few neural circuits (simple ideas) versus thinking and remembering using many neural circuits organized by meaning into neural networks (complex concepts) also has profound implications for one's cognitive abilities such as one's abilities to learn, remember learned material, and think critically or creatively, as well as ultimately one's intelligence (which is the single most important tool humans use to adapt, and accounts for most of the difference among a person merely surviving vs. coping vs. succeeding vs. excelling in life). For now, as that great humanist psychologist, Porky Pig, says, "The-the, the-the, the-the, that's all for now, folks!"

 

---

Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on Yahoo! TV. __._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] Re: A message from a confidant two years ago

Yes, Jamal Vai.

 

I have also heard and observed the similar thing, which you nicely spelled out.

 

Hardcore Paki-Jamat-RAZAKARs-Muslim League supporter-cadres (now most of them are in the container of BNP-Jamat) can do any thing to take the revenge of shameful defeat, insult, slaughter which they suffered in 1971 by the actions of the leaders-supporters of Bangabandhu - Awami League and pro-liberation Parties & forces (MUKTI BAHINEE). Paki-Jamat-RAZAKARs-Muslim League supporter-cadres are still hatred, insulted, abused by Bangalee today and will be continuously hatred, insulted, battered - thousands of years to come.

 

See, that is why they, Paki-Jamat-RAZAKARs-Muslim League supporter-cadres have given (donated for time being) their:

 

• Property & machineries (of the daily 'Songram', only press & newspaper of Jamat) to the newly formed JSD to publish the daily "GONAKANTHA", to print & spread lies and mix of lies & truth against Bangabandhu, Awami League

 

• Leaders (Once pure Marxist (!), founder President of JSD Maj Jalil, then turn into the veteran Islamic leader after seventies),
• Journalist & manpower (Once tainted Marxist (!), Al Mahmud, founder editor of the "GONAKANTHA", now become Islamic newspaper columnist & regular columnist of Jamat funded-minded-patron daily the "NOYADIGONTA

 

• Paki-Jamat-Razakar-ML also have given their full physical-political support to the JSD (that is why JSD & its associate organisation were 'popular' up to 1978, until Paki-Jamat-Razakar-ML group has reformed & made their own bases & address), though JSD's main slogan & goal was "AMADER   LOKKHO  BOIGGANIK  SOMAJTONTRO", completely against the political philosophy(!) of Paki-Jamat-Razakar-ML.

 

So they (Paki-Jamat-Razakar-ML) can do any thing to take the revenge of disgraceful and dishonourable defeat, insult, death which they suffered in 1971 by the actions of the leaders-supporters of Bangabandhu, Awami League and pro-liberation Parties & forces. 


"Sustha thakon, nirapade thakon ebong valo thakon"

Shuvechhante,

Shafiqur Rahman Bhuiyan (ANU)

NEW ZEALAND.


N.B.: If any one is offended by content of this e-mail, please ignore & delete this e-mail. I will also request you to inform me - to delete your name from my contact list.

 

On 10/10/07, Jamal Hasan <poplu@hotmail.com> wrote:

 

 

A confidant sent me the following on August 18, 2005. - Jamal Hasan

 

 

I wanted to share the following info with you. I am not sure if you are already aware of it. This bombing and other Islamic extremist activities in Bangladesh has a long root and were planned long before.

Did you know about the whereabouts of the killers of 1975 after Awami League came to power? All those who were working in foreign embassies lost their jobs and were summoned back in Bangladesh. Obviously, none of them returned but escaped after losing their foreign service jobs. During that entire Awami League period, at least 4 of them were in Pakistan and working closely with ISI. They were hired as military training consultants for the Talibans in Afghanistan. They had a different agaenda than other Taliban forces. They contacted Jamat-i-Islami and other Islamic parties in Bangladesh who sent batches after batches of madrasha students and they were directly trained under the command of the killer (of 75) majors. Their aim was to organize a force in Bangladesh for an Islamic revolution at a later suitable time. In 4 years, approximately 35,000 cadres and madrasaha students got training from those majors.  They may have different agenda but they have a common goal. To get rid of Awami League - the secular pillar of bangladesh politics.

Khaleda though looks powerful is a puppet to Pakistani intelligence agency, ISI. One example will make it clear. Salauddin Quader Chowdhury was expelled from BNP and remember the comments he made about Khaleda (tail navigating dog, living with divored wife etc). A vindictive Khaleda would never look back at him. She not only looked back but took him back, gave him nomination and made him her parliamentary advisor!!

Those who think Islamic extremists are very few and weak in Bangladesh should know that things have gone too far and all the way too long. They got organized during the last Awami League regime and till then they had at least 35000 foreign trained cadres!!

It was a long-term plan of ISI to take revenge of 1971. Now Pakistani presiden Pervez Musharraf went against Jihadis because of pressure from the U.S. but he is repatriating them in Bangladesh under the safe haven of Khaleda-Nizami rule.

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___