Banner Advertiser

Friday, May 2, 2008

[mukto-mona] A pro-people leader .....from the Daily New Age, Published on May 3,2008

A pro-people leader


The Anti-Corruption Commission on Monday appealed to a Dhaka Court seeking to exempt the former food minister Matia Chowdhury and eight others from corruption charges in a 2002 case. Matia has demonstrated that she is a true politician and a pro-people leader. Heartiest congratulations, Matia Chowdhury!
   Gopal Sengupta
   Canada


Kamal Hossain's comment


First of all, I would like to thank Dr Kamal Hossain for his honest comment about our highly corrupt politicians. I also read Hasina's comments in your daily where she said that she would not retire from politics and her party would not participate in election without her. A real politician who loves her country cannot make such comments. Her utterances about Dr Kamal Hossain once again crossed the level of political etiquette, minimum decency and civility.
   Nasir
   Canada

Next on Quick Comments
a. World press freedom day today

b. May Day in a land of no trade union rights (May 1, 2008) c. They sell wage slips for lower prices to buy bread for family (May 1, 2008) d. Govt decides to ban rice export: Restrictions on hilsa export to go (May 1, 2008) e. Delwar not allowed to distribute food among the poor (May 1, 2008) f. Govt warns Chevron of action if found responsible for Lawacherra fire (May 1, 2008)


'Quick Comments', (01713-065-354, letters@newagebd.com, quickcomments@gmail.com ) seeks the readers' instant reaction on different national and international issues. Comments should be brief, not exceeding 150 words. Submissions should mention 'Quick Comments' and will be subject to editing for quality and clarity.
__._,_.___

*****************************************
Sign the Petition : Release the Arrested University Teachers Immediately : An Appeal to the Caretaker Government of Bangladesh

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/university_teachers_arrest.htm

*****************************************
Daily Star publishes an interview with Mukto-Mona
http://www.mukto-mona.com/news/daily_star/daily_star_MM.pdf

*****************************************

MM site is blocked in Islamic countries such as UAE. Members of those theocratic states, kindly use any proxy (such as http://proxy.org/) to access mukto-mona.

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates 5th Anniversary
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/5_yrs_anniv/index.htm

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates Earth Day:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Earth_day2006/index.htm

*****************************************
Kansat Uprising : A Special Page from Mukto-Mona 
http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/kansat2006/members/


*****************************************
MM Project : Grand assembly of local freedom fighters at Raumari
http://www.mukto-mona.com/project/Roumari/freedom_fighters_union300306.htm

*****************************************
German Bangla Radio Interviews Mukto-Mona Members:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/german_radio/


Mukto-Mona Celebrates Darwin Day:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/index.htm

*****************************************

Some FAQ's about Mukto-Mona:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/new_site/mukto-mona/faq_mm.htm

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] Fw: Please help promote A Community Guide to Environmental Health

--- On Thu, 5/1/08, Jeff Conant <jeff@hesperian.org> wrote:

> Dear Prabir,
>
> Greetings! I hope this note finds you well.
>
> Hesperian will be releasing our long awaited book, A
> Community Guide
> to Environmental Health this June, 2008. Since and you work
> with the
> issues that the book is about and the communities for whom
> it was
> written, we welcome your suggestions for ensuring that it
> is widely
> distributed and reviewed.
>
> A description of the book in its final form can be found on
> our
> website, here: http://www.hesperian.org/

> projects_inProgress_communityGuide.php
>
> Kindly respond to the following questions, along with any
> additional
> suggestions you have. When you respond, please hit 'reply
> all,' as
> our current publicist, Heidi Quante, will be gathering your
> responses
> and following up.
>
> 1) Please recommend newsletters or magazines we should
> approach to
> review the book. We would also greatly appreciate it if you
> can share
> any contacts you have at these publications.
>
> 2) Can you help spread the word by sending an
> e-announcement (which
> we will provide) to your email lists and listserves, or by
> posting an
> announcement about the book on your website?
>
> 3) Can you also recommend other listserves and websites
> that would
> help in spreading the word about the publication? If yes,
> do you
> have a contact person for these listserves/websites?
>
> 4) Please recommend individuals and organizations you think
> might be
> especially helpful in promoting or distributing A Community
> Guide to
> Environmental Health. Please provide names and contact
> information
> if possible.
>
> 5) Are there any organizations you believe would be
> potential bulk
> buyers of the book for distribution to their networks?
>
> 6) Any conferences where we should exhibit the book and
> seek to do a
> presentation?
>
> 7) Anything else?
>
> Please email your comments to: Heidi Quante at
> qheidi@gmail.com or
> call anytime to discuss further suggestions.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to contribute. We'll be
> holding a book
> launch celebration on June 12 in Berkeley, so save the date
> and we'll
> send you an invitation soon.
> -- Jeff
>
>
> Jeff Conant
> Project Coordinator
> A Community Guide to Environmental Health
> Hesperian Foundation
>
> 1919 Addison Street, Ste 304
> Berkeley CA, 94704
> Tel: (510) 845 1447 x: 211
> Fax: (510) 845 0539


------------------------------------

*****************************************
Sign the Petition : Release the Arrested University Teachers Immediately : An Appeal to the Caretaker Government of Bangladesh

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/university_teachers_arrest.htm

*****************************************
Daily Star publishes an interview with Mukto-Mona
http://www.mukto-mona.com/news/daily_star/daily_star_MM.pdf

*****************************************

MM site is blocked in Islamic countries such as UAE. Members of those theocratic states, kindly use any proxy (such as http://proxy.org/) to access mukto-mona.

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates 5th Anniversary

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/5_yrs_anniv/index.htm

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates Earth Day:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Earth_day2006/index.htm

*****************************************
Kansat Uprising : A Special Page from Mukto-Mona

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/kansat2006/members/


*****************************************
MM Project : Grand assembly of local freedom fighters at Raumari

http://www.mukto-mona.com/project/Roumari/freedom_fighters_union300306.htm

*****************************************
German Bangla Radio Interviews Mukto-Mona Members:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/german_radio/


Mukto-Mona Celebrates Darwin Day:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/index.htm


*****************************************

Some FAQ's about Mukto-Mona:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/new_site/mukto-mona/faq_mm.htm

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/


****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
-Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:mukto-mona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:mukto-mona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mukto-mona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[mukto-mona] Gyanendra hawks

 
So-called security experts like B Raman, associated with the Ambanis' Observer Research Foundation ( ostensibly a research outfit, bit actually politically motivated to the interests of the Mukesh Ambani group, with a turncoat R K Mishra, formerly editor Patriot * Link at the helm) , and Brahma Chellaney were trying their best to prevent the Indian government from taking a stand in favour of democracy. A section of journalists was acting as conduits. Take Indrani Bagchi's article in ToI, promoting B Raman as India's arguably one of the best security analysts.

Keeping this background of tendentious commentaries, pl read J Sri Raman's piece, reproduced below.
SR

Undo Nepal's Polls: India's Hawks
    By J. Sri Raman
    t r u t h o u t | Perspective

    Friday 02 May 2008

    Nepal has belied prophecies of a post-election upheaval. All sections of the Himalayan nation and its political spectrum would appear to have accepted the Maoist victory in the polls to the Constituent Assembly (CA). None has rejected the results - not even the royal camp - at least in public.

    This, however, cannot be said of some quarters in India. Demands have been raised within Nepal's proudly democratic neighbor for action by New Delhi to undo the outcome of the CA elections.

    The most outrageous demand is one for covert official support for a military coup in Nepal. And it has come from a security expert who can be presumed to speak for influential sections in India's intelligence establishment as well.

    B. Raman was the additional secretary at the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), India's external espionage agency, and headed the counterterrorism division at RAW for more than a decade until his retirement in 1994. We need say no more. Now he is the director of the Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai (formerly Madras), one of the many "think-tanks" providing grist to the mill of India's militarism.

    On April 27, Raman wrote: "As a successful democracy, India cannot support a military coup in any country.... But sometimes, in our national interest, we may have to close our eyes to a military takeover or to the evils of a military rule in a neighboring country." India may have to do so, he added, as "we have been doing in the case of Myanmar for over a decade now" and as "we did in Bangladesh last year when chronic political instability seemed to be pushing the country into the hands of jihadi terrorists of various hues and ... vintages."

    Raman went on to argue: "We may be well-advised to do so if the Royal Nepalese Army (RNA) decides to prevent the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoists) led by Prachanda, which has emerged as the leading party in the recent elections, from using its position as the leader of the Government to convert the RNA with its glorious traditions into the People's Liberation Army (PLA) of Nepal patterned after the PLA of China and North Korea and after the Cuban Army." The Royal Nepalese Army shed its prefix and became the Nepal Army on May 18, 2006, but loyal Raman and the like-minded do not recognize the change. They might have read some of the numerous reports by human rights agencies and others about the war crimes and rights abuses by the RNA (and to a lesser extent by the Maoists), but this has made little difference to their loyalty.

    Raman continued: "In his statements and interviews before the elections, Prachanda (Maoist chief) has given clear indications of (his and) their priorities if the Maoists came to power.

First, have the monarchy abolished and proclaim Nepal as a republic with a presidential style of government.


Second, assume office as the president of Nepal.


Third, abrogate all existing agreements with India and renegotiate those which are considered to be in Nepal's interests.


Fourth, merge the armed cadres of the Maoists into the RNA to convert a royalist army into a people's army." No way could he and other Indians, with an idea of "national interest" that had nothing in common with Nepal's, forgive the Maoists for their fourth major objective. Integration of the People's Liberation Army of the Maoists with the Nepal Army, as a sequel to the surrender of the former's arms under a United Nations-supervised arrangement, may be part of the pact that brought the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) into the political mainstream. That, however, did not mean that the Ramans of India could not dream of the restoration of a hated monarchy in Nepal after a military coup.
    The Ramans are not alone. Royalists in Nepal share their dream. In an earlier report, I quoted a well-known royalist as talking of a religious crusade against the Maoists. Maj.-Gen. Bharat Keshwer Simha, known for proximity to the palace, had then said: "If the Maoists can take up arms and come to power, Hindus will also take up arms. It will be worse than the Maoists' war." The far right in India fully shares the sentiment. The main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has refrained from calling for a military coup, but warned the Indian government that Maoists' victory in Nepal polls could lead to the growth of the extreme-left menace in the country, causing serious internal security problems.

    "If Indian government could declare Indian Maoists and Naxalites as terrorists, why are Maoists in Nepal not declared a terrorist outfit?" Yogi Adityanath, a BJP member, asked in the Lok Sabha (the Lower House of India's parliament) the other day. He saw a "red danger" for India following the former rebels' win in the CA election and the imminent abolition of monarchy in Nepal.

    No one is asking for direct military intervention by India, of course. At the peak of the Maoists' armed struggle, their supporters claimed that the India-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship, 1950, contained secret annexures, covering mutual assistance in case of an emergency such as their rebellion. Sections of Nepal's media reported in February 2005 that Gen. Pyar Jung Thapa, chief of the Royal Nepalese Army, had hinted at King Gyanandra invoking the provisions of the treaty and seeking Indian military support against the Maoists. This did not prove possible then and is unlikely to do so in the days ahead.

    If Raman wants India only to encourage a military coup in Nepal, some others in the country's anti-Maoist camp are asking New Delhi to organize sabotage inside Nepal. Another well-known security expert, not without admirers in the establishment, Brahma Chellaney, professor of strategic studies at New Delhi's Center for Policy Research, has argued for manipulation of a minority of Indian origin in Nepal for this purpose.

    Chellaney wrote on April 28: "New Delhi ought not to shy away from employing the immense leverage it holds: Nepal's topography, with mountainous terrain sliding southward into plains, shapes its economic dependence on India. The ethnic Madhesis who populate the Terai, Nepal's food bowl, are India's natural constituency, and that card is begging to be exercised."

    The US is reportedly undecided as yet about removing the "terrorist" tag it had put on the Maoists in recognition of the election results. George W. Bush, however, told a gathering of Indian Americans in Washington on May 2: "We're working with India to promote democracy and the peace it yields throughout the continent. We're working together to extend the hope of liberty throughout Asia." Are Raman and Chellaney spelling out what the US president had in mind for Nepal?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A freelance journalist and a peace activist in India, J. Sri Raman is the author of "Flashpoint" (Common Courage Press, USA). He is a regular contributor to Truthout. __._,_.___

*****************************************
Sign the Petition : Release the Arrested University Teachers Immediately : An Appeal to the Caretaker Government of Bangladesh

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/university_teachers_arrest.htm

*****************************************
Daily Star publishes an interview with Mukto-Mona
http://www.mukto-mona.com/news/daily_star/daily_star_MM.pdf

*****************************************

MM site is blocked in Islamic countries such as UAE. Members of those theocratic states, kindly use any proxy (such as http://proxy.org/) to access mukto-mona.

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates 5th Anniversary
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/5_yrs_anniv/index.htm

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates Earth Day:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Earth_day2006/index.htm

*****************************************
Kansat Uprising : A Special Page from Mukto-Mona 
http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/kansat2006/members/


*****************************************
MM Project : Grand assembly of local freedom fighters at Raumari
http://www.mukto-mona.com/project/Roumari/freedom_fighters_union300306.htm

*****************************************
German Bangla Radio Interviews Mukto-Mona Members:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/german_radio/


Mukto-Mona Celebrates Darwin Day:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/index.htm

*****************************************

Some FAQ's about Mukto-Mona:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/new_site/mukto-mona/faq_mm.htm

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] The birth of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh is collapse of "Two nation theory" on which Pakistan was created

Its true.
In 1940, even Mr. Jinnah was not sure that Great Britain would relinquish her Colonial Empire. Moslim League had only demanded a separate Federation of Moslim Majority States and lands not Pakistan completely independent of British Vicroy in Pakistan Resolution but when Mr. Jinnah was permitted to have such a Federation, he had realized that British were about to relinquish India therefore, he had not accepted Vicroy as head of state of Pakistan and declared himself Governor General of Pakistan under Vicroy to test the British.
 
On August 14th, 1947 Great Britain had granted Dominion Status to India and Pakistan and not complete freedom. The complete freedom had come to India in 1951 and to Pakistan in 1953 (on 23rd of March) after which the heads of states of India and Pakistan could call themselves Presidents.
 
So actually, test of Mr. Jinnah had come a lot before, when Vicroy of Indian Sub Continent had ordered Mr. Jinnah to desist invasion of Kashmir State immediately or face retaliation of British Army in 1948. Nwaab Liaqat Ali Khan, the Prime Minister of Pakistan on East Pakistan Quota had gotten real mad at Mr. Jinnah for ordering pull-out of Pak Army (in and not in Unifrom) from Kashmir but couldn't do anything since he could not rebel against him. (Ref: Biography of Personal Assisstant of Mr. Jinnah, who later became Attorney General of Pakistan).
 
Nwaab Liaqat Ali Khan had violated the 1940 Pakistan Resolution that had demanded a separate Federation of Moslim states for Moslims of Sub Continent first by refusing to let Socialist Bangla Nationalist controversial leader Sir Shaheed Hussain Sohorwardi enter Pakistan. Though later he was permitted to enter but Pakistan had closed the borders in 1951 ending emigration of Moslims in to Pakistan violating 1940 Resolution bases on 2 Nation Theory that Pakistan was permitted to become a separate nation by the British.
 
The British didn't care, how Pakis go against their own words and had not wanted anything to do with Sub Continent India, where their people, who's up to 7 generations were born were forced to leave just out of prejudice though they were patriotic to Mother India and British India being 2nd largest Creditor Country of the world behind USA, when IMF was formed in 1944 was a solid proof of that.
 
Millions of Sub Continent-born British and Half British called Anglo Indians had to leave because of prejudice and mistreatment of Indians and Pakis. The Result was, famous British Rock Star Cliff Richards was born in Lucknow, India but had not much to say in favour of India. Sir Bertrand Russel, a Philosopher was born in Lahore, West Pakistan and spoke a lot better Urdu than even Literate Pakistani Prose Writers (Ref: Urdu Writings of Sir Bertrand Russel and his speeches in Literary Gatherings in Pakistan much later) but he died without saying anything good about Bureaucracy of Pakistan after Independence.
 
Now we can see, Indians, Pakis and Bangladeshis claiming their Naturalized Citizenships and asking for equal rights as people born in those countries for ages in all European Countries without remembering, what had they done to up to 7th generation British born in their homeland after 1947. What a shame ...!       

Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@yahoo.com> wrote:
Friends

If religion is the basis of a nation then there should have been one Muslim country, one christian country, one hindu country, one buddist country.

The real story  is that that it was the pakistanis(west) deceived the Bangalees by converting many Muslims states to one Muslim states falsifying Historic Lahore Resolution of 1940.
So, the arguments placed now is nothing but to stir the old shit swalllowed by the marauder pakis in the hands of heroic Bangladeshis.

Faruque Alamgir

Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mr. Aslam,
              Pakistan was an unnatural country separated by 1200 miles of enemy territory, ithad to split any time,. It was inevitable and that is what had happened. It has nothing to do with the two nation theory.  To prove the two nation therory wrong you have to ensure the akhnad bharat where the people of Pakistan and Bangladesh will join India out of their free will.. I can bet my bottom dollar that that day will never come Mr Aslam.
                       Salahuddin ASyubi

Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Salahuddin Ayubi
 
Yes, sir !  the defunct two nation theory has failed in reality...
 
The Muslims living under British India were not one nation,
and it has been proven by historical developments.
 
The birth of Bangladesh has proven that Two Nation Theory"
has collasped. Currently, the Muslims of the sub-continent
are spread over three nations: [in Pakistan, India, & Bangladesh].
The two nation theory did not survive the test of time.
It just a matter of  time that we may see another splinter nation:
The United Republic of Baluchistan.....
 
 
There is a genuine possibility that the Pakhtunistan movement may 
resurge soon after Talebanism in Pakistan is uprooted.
 
Some dreaming fools dream and ISI supported conspirators dreams
about  back to Akhand Pakistan but that will happen only in a fools
paradaise.
 
Continuing autonomy/Independence Movements in Pakistan are:
(1)  Independent Sindhu Desh / 'Jiey Sindhu Desh'  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sindhudesh ]
(2)  Azad Baluchistan
(3)  Free Paktunistan
 
The hundutva dream about Akhand Bharat failed in 1947. The idea Akhand
Bharat is now buried in the dustbin of  history. No one thinks about Akhand
Bharat [expcept as a scare tactics by some vested Islam-passands in
Bangladesh].
 
There are realistic possibility that Hindustan will further divide: The Sikh struggle
for Khalistan is ongoing. Think about the "Seven Sisters in Assam and thinks about
the Dalits ... The Hindus are not one nation either. [As a matter of fact the Hindus are
not even a single religion. The Hinduism is an umbrella term for few ancient religions ... ]
 
Thanks for reminding us that Moududi opposed the creation of Pakistan,
His followers the Jamaate Islami opposed the liberation of People's Republic of
Bangladesh...these opportunist-ideologs are always in the wrong side of
history ... Jamaate Islami has always been against the mass people.
 
Thanks
 
Syed Aslam
 
Note:
 
India (Muslim Population = 144,198,760 ) has more Muslims than that of Bangladesh (Muslim Population = 115,517, 477) Pakistan (Muslim Population = 140,278,140 ) Indonesia ( Muslim Population = 201,025,326
 

 
On 5/1/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mr. Aslam,
              Has the two nation theory really failed? If it had then there would be akahnd bharat. Do you see the plight of of Muslim in the Hindu raj, the so called secular India?.
           For your kind information Moududi opposed the creation fo Pakistan as Molana Azad did. Please keep your deductions to yourself and do not confuse the gullible public.
           Salahuddin Ayubi


Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:
The birth of  Peoples Republic of Bangladesh is the collapse of "Two nation theory" on which Pakistan was created.
 
Mr. Md. Mostafa Kamal
 
The establishment of Independent Peoples Republic of Bangladesh is essentially the
collapse of "Two nation theory" on which Pakistan was created as homeland for the
Muslims of India. The other homeland in the world is Israel which is a Jewish homeland
a result of long-term strategy of the Western powers. Your love for Pakistan is well known.
Mr. Irfan Husain, in his editorial in the Dawn observes that it has now become an "impossible
and exceedingly boring task of defending a defunct theory." [ Two nation Theory]
 
I don't and had never belonged to Awami League or any other political party. Although I
consider Moududibadi Jamaate Islami is the worst political force in Bangladesh [from the
public interest point of view.]
 
You had lied in your original posting that
""In 28th Oct 2006 BAL's supporters plunged over Jamat's meeting
leaded by Haji Selim & Dr. Iqbal"
 
In my posting I had the links including that of your favourite NoyaDigonto to present both side
of the October 28th 2006  story. Even the Jamaati version didn't support your claim
that Haji Selim and Dr. Iqbal led attack on Jamaat that day You lied to make your point and you
got caught with your hands in the cookie jar. You have lost all your credibilities.
 
Mir Zafor played the key role in the defeat in the of Palassy. Jogot Shet, Rai Ballav, Umi-Chand
Raja Krishna Chandra Roy, Mohmodi Beg et el were co-conspiritors. That does not absolve
Mir Zafor of his guilts. Mir Zafor symbolizes the traitors & treachery.
The Mir Zafors of 1971 were even worse ... they proudly collaborated with the occupation
army in killing our people and raping our women........
 
You have been mixing up issues and conjuring false alligations out of thin air: I don't
represent your off-repeated BAL or the India.  Do you have problems in understanding
plain laguage? Or it is your attitude towards others who thinks differently than that of
you and cohorts?
 
Last, but not the least, communalism in all it's form must be condenmed:
be it Hindutva communalism or be it Jamaati Fundamentalism and parochialism.....
 
"1947 Partition AND 1971 Liberation War = An Independent Bangladesh."
is a historical fact. But the question remains why Muslim League,  Jamaate Islami,
Nejame Islami and other religion-traders, not only officially opposed the creation of
Independent Peoples Republicof Bangladesh, but collaborated with the occupation
regime and the Jamaati gestapos [Al-bodor, Al-shams and Razakars] activly took
part in the killing & raping missions of ordinary people in the occupied Bangladesh.
Hasn't this been done in the name of Islam?
 
 Thanks
 
Syed Aslam
 
On 4/29/08, Md. Mostafa Kamal <mmk3k@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mr. Aslam,
 
You're not exception from your BAL party i. e. Offence is the best defense. By calling me ISI, Paki, Jamati which is "SHAAK DIYE MAACH DHAKAR BERTHO CHESTA!". There is no way by condemning India for its stepmother act with Bangladesh that I am favoring Pakistan. 54-55 rivers water are one sided withdrawn by India, Pressure for land transit to reach seven sisters, not allowing Bangladesh for transit to Nepal & Bhutan, there is almost no tax free for Bangladesh product & even ISO certified products regularly face Indian custom objections, for a long time India did not allow any Bangladeshi investor to invest in India, anti-Bangladesh propaganda by Indian, past & present anti-unity activities by Shanti Bahinis & Nikhil Bongo Andolon etc. So these are the matters do they in favor of Pakistan? Have I ever written in favor of Pakistan which is against Bangladesh? It is blind BAL"s, Secularists, Pro-Indians colors the real patriots of Bangladesh. Look at the illogical matter bellow;
 
MANUSH MURGI KHAI, MURGI BISHTHA KHAI.......
SO MANUSH'O BISTHA KHAI. Is this possible?
 
So either it is Jamati or Paki-panthis or Razakars or Patriots of Bangladesh whatever say we have to scrutinize or analyze the matter whether it is in favor of Bangladesh or not. But you're like a Cunning Fox not analyzing the matter you're calling me ISI, Pakis & Jamat comprehensively. ONDHO HOLAI KI PROLOY BONDHO HOY MR. ASLAM?
 
Look the Partition of the Sub-Continent or failure of untied Bengal is just not the consequence of the British colonialism. You just Blaming Mir Jafar, which he is the most culprit of the lost of Nawab Sirajuddawla in 1757. But what about Jogot Shet, Rai Ballav, Umi-Chad, Raja Krishna Chandra Roy? Weren't they know about the conspiracy about PALASHI war. They also inspire & behind Mir Jafar. Similarly the British couldn't concer the whole Sub-Continent if they did not get the help from Hindus & specially from the High Race Brahmmans. Because the Hindus wanted to pull out the Muslim or Moghal's ruling from Delhi. You're helping & favoring the Brahmmans by not criticize them. That is why you're mentioning that failure of United Bengal is just a history. No Mr. Aslam it is just not a ordinary history but a vital turning point of time & history. Look when the Congress denied the demand from the Muslim leaders for 25% partnership in the party (the Hindu leaders rejected it) then Muslims have left no option but to form the Muslim League. Do you like to say these Brahmmans in the Congress ran by the Idea of the British? So do not be so smart Mr. Aslam. The link
http://www.dailynayadiganta.com/2007/10/08/fullnews.asp?News_ID=46264&sec=4
 
clearly shows that Muhammad Ali Jinnah was not against United Bengal but Neheru & all most all the Hindu leaders of West Bengal was against United Bengal. This reference brought from Nicholas Mansergh, The Transfer of Power, 1942-47, vol. X, with page numbers. You do not want to Blame WB's dadas, so-called secularists in Bangladesh & the Pro-Indians here.
 
Mr. Aslam dragging the 1757 Palashi war's reference to compare with "if the 1947 partition or East Pakistan was not born how could we get Bangladesh? " is totally irrelevant of our debate. Bangladesh stands on the 56000 square miles which we have gotten in 1947. 1971's based on this 56000 SQ. miles. If the whole Bengal joined the India like the West Bengal how could we get today's Bangladesh, that is my question. But you're never close to my answer & instead of that you're making illogical comments, illusions & misguiding the debate totally to the wrong track. Just like "PANI GHOLA KORA BA HOJOBOROLO". 1971 is the consistency of 1947. You simply can not reverse the history of a forming a country but to accept the facts. Again I like to say it was Muslim hating Hindu leaders of course supported by the Most Hindus in WB have acted against to form a unite Bengal. Look Sheikh Mujib also was the supporter of Muslim League & struggled for Pakistan before 1947 when he was confirmed that united Bengal is not possible. So the Late Honorable Khatib Obaidul Haq said those who say that 1947's decision to form East Pakistan is incorrect is a JAROJ(1994 or 1995). Look at Kashmir where Indian occupation has broken all most all the International Human Rights law to capture for it even the 87% Kashmirese would definitely like to join Pakistan. It seems you want the same situation. In Bangladesh's constitution it is articulated that Bangladesh's Land or its area are the same of former East Pakistan. Only Pro-Indians are hurt by the partition of 1947. You belong to them. As I have asked you several times about the Shekhor Commissions report in India about the backwards of the most of the minority Muslims there in India, which you're still silent. It is the Hindus who do not want that most Muslims should be well higher-educated or scholars, rich, get enough Govt. & private jobs or become elite persons. Look at both Bangladesh & Pakistan though each of the country's Muslims number bellow the Indian Muslims but in those countries there are vast numbers of Muslim Engineers, Doctors, Master Degree or Graduate Degree holders, scholars etc. If the Partition was not happened then entire sub-continents Muslim would be the burden for it. Because the Bangladesh & Pakistan severed from India for that is why they are Muslim majority to provide enough education for its Muslim people. But only the DALALS of India will deny it.
 
Look Mohajir problem is just an exception. There is also Sindh, Beluch, Patahn (tribal) problem back in Pakistan. But still Pakistan is united & has managed to get all most all its genuine rights as a neighboring country of India. Five common rivers water are shared by the international law. India can not play cat & mouse (TAAL BAHANA) with Pakistan with many common matters including this. If we the Bangladeshis who draws this kind of examples the BAL, so called secularists, Pro-Indians colors us the Razakar, Pakis, Jamatis whether it is totally in favor of Bangladesh. Syed Aslam is just like the DALAL the x-water resource minister Abdur Razzak(BAL) was angry why the x-foreign minister Mr. Morshed Khan complain against India in the UN not give us enough water through Faraqqa Barage 2005-06. It is clear that what ever India will do even it is against Bangladesh's favor there Syed Aslam & his BAL gongs will not allow you to criticize India. That is why he draws of Paki-Indian Dalal with the record of YOUTUBE.
 
Mr. Aslam you make me laugh again to consider you as a Joker. Are you blind because you did not read the article of Nayadiganta (which you've given me) where it reported on the 28th October of 2006 fully. There it has said it was BAL's terrorists who shot bullets towards Jamat's supporters & not Jamat to the BAL. So do not be foolish or Stupid. I condemn Janakantha & other BAL media who mentioned that Jamat has shot bullets to the BAL mob. In fact the BAL has first attacked on the Jamat's meeting on the North Gate of Baitul Mokarram. Again you have acted as an cunning fox, which will not hide the facts. Like you & your BAL gong condemn Shahid Zia for Shah Azizur Rahman. He was freed by Bongobandhu & presented of can at the price of 22000 taka (Prothom Alo 26th March 2008). So truth will over come. Whether you like it or not.
 
Mr. Aslam neither internet nor this e-forum is your property. By questioning the appearance of me "from where Md. Mostafa Kamal comes from" etc is act of undemocratic comments. As you're a Pro-Indian you will find confusion in my writings but the true patriots of Bangladesh my writings are articulated. I have never asked that from where you come. I have the same right to write in the internet as you have. Your acts just like BAKSHALIi's. You & your BAL gongs want to score goals where your opponent is not present in the field. But if you think so then you're living in fools heaven. You guys are so far from the facts & all most whatever you say just for your fake mental satisfaction.
 
Thank You All,
 
Md. Mostafa Kamal.
 


Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Md. Mostafa Kamal
Where did you find this :
"It is you who are so hurt person who cries or tears for division of so called Mother India."
Why are you attributing this on me?
Can you substantiate your false statement that I am espousing a "Mother India"?
After getting caught by lying about  October-28 episode, you became so un-nerved that you have brought that issue out of context .....
This is an age old tactics by the Pakistan lovers, Jamaatis also use this tactics in their propaganda. 
 
The article in your link is very ambigious. It is true that Suhrawardy and Sarat Bose [Brother of Subash Chandra Bose] jointly proposed the creation of United Bengal .The Hindu Mohashova, a  staunchly communal hindutva political party, counterpart of today's Jamaate Islami tabled the
main  opposition to the concept of Independentt Bengal in 1971. Some Hindu and Muslim leaders of  Bengal supported Suhrawardy and Sarat Bose in their move. Prominent among them were Kiran Shankar Roy (Leader of the Congress Parliamentary Party in Bengal Assembly), Satya Ranjan Bakshi (Sarat Bose's Secretary), ABUL HASHIM (Secretary of the Bengal Provincial
Muslim League), Fazlur Rahman (Revenue Minister of the Province),MOHAMMAD ALI  CHOWDHURY (Finance Minister in Suhrawardy's cabinet) and others. For a short duration, the
proposal was discussed both at private and public bodies and important negotiations took place  among Bengal leaders. In fact, the concept of a sovereign independent Bengal had its origins in  the past. The adoption of the  LAHORE RESOLUTION in March 1940  was a significant step
towards highlighting the demand for Independent Bengal. .... these are all HISTORY....History can not be repaired but falsification and twistings of history can be used to create new history ...  that's what the defeatist Pakistan lovers and their cronies are trying ...
 
FYI, there are no one shading  of tears for the division of so called Mother India in our 21st  century world except for few Mohajir leaders (MQM) in Pakistan who diplore the miserable plights of refugee Indian muslims in Pakistan  & Bangladesh [see
]

Md. Mostafa Kamal's hypothesis of "Mother India" is a part of ISI's propaganda ploy to divert the attention of the masses from the real issues of  Bangladesh which is: democracy & people's power, eradiction of corruptions, fair trial of the accused,  impending food crisis, and punishment
of all the collaborators of Pakistan etc.
 
Mr. Md Mostafa Kamal'as another contention:"If the East Pakistan was not born how could  you get Bangladesh by severing India? " He should thank Mir Zafor and the British occupation, because if Nawab Sirajudullah was not defeated and Clive didn't win, there would not have been
any Pakistan. Historically, Pakistan is a consequence of British occupation of the Sub-continent.
 
I have no idea where this Md. Mostofa Kamal is comming from?
He is either ideologically motivated by the Pakistan doctrine or he is utterly, a confused guy. His confused thinkings lead to his confused writing ... as always.
 
Last, but not the least, communalism in all it's form must be condenmed: be it Hindutva communalism  or be it Jamaati Fundamentalism and parochialism.....
 
Readers, if you are interested to read a comparatively unbiased paper on Suhrawardy-Sarat Bose  maneuvors  for Independent Bengal please see (1) A move for United Independent Bengal/Harunor Rashid.
                         (2) East Bengal at independence/Ahmed Kamal.
                         (3) Language movement/Badruddin Umar
 
These are included in the book  History of Bangladesh 1704-1971 (3 Vols-Set) edited by Sirajul Islam
and published by Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. Also read:
Amar Jibon - An autobiography by Dr. Badruddin Umar[Dr. Umar son Mr. ABUL HASHIM (Secretary of the Bengal Provincial Muslim League), of  was an eye witness to the United Bengal move.
 
Thanks
 
Syed Aslam
 
PS: "In 28th Oct 2006 BAL's supporters plunged over Jamat's meeting leaded by Haji Selim & Dr. Iqbal" Lie! lie! lie! [Mr. Kamal is a true decendent of Goebbles? .... Ekta lie bar bar bolle ki se ta sotto hoye jai ... ?]


 
On 4/27/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com> wrote:
I am with you Mr. Kamal. Your rebuttal though is brief but it is exactly to the point. Looking forward to Mr. Aslams' answer.
            Salahuddin Ayubi


"Md. Mostafa Kamal" <mmk3k@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mr. Aslam,
 
It is you who are so hurt person who cries or tears for division of so called Mother India. Of course not me by the broken of Pakistan. Bangladesh is my only & last address in this world. Look at the Shekhor Commission's report on Indian Muslims. Comparing Bangladesh-Pakistan Vs India how many Doctors, Engineers, MBA etc Muslim scholars in those countries. If the East Pakistan was not born how could you get Bangladesh by severing India? It is the WB's Hindu leader who prefer to Join India rather than a United Bengal. Please see bellow;
 

Look your BAL's Netri Hasina was called the Chief Minister back in Kolkata. Was it lie? She laughed & never protested. So did you. So we want a PM of an Independent & Sovereign Bangladesh, which you & your BAL gong Kabir Chowdhury, Late-Wahidul Haq wants to go back before 1947 for United India or AKHONDO BHARAT MATA & say proudly JOY HIND.
So it is the burning differnce between you & me.
 
Thank You All,
 
Md. Mostafa Kamal.

Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Md. Mostafa Kamal
 
This is the reason that Mullahs abhor Free-Mixing !
[Keep the women out of the University .... Co-education,
Co-education .... NauzuBillah, NauzuBillah !!! - Sibir slogan]
 
May be now she will quit BCL and join Sibir and turn into a Hijabi.
Some people learn in the hard way and some never learn...
 
As far as I see, you are inherently a bitter person, you are angry
and put all your anger on BAL because Awami League has 
broken your favorite Pakistan into two pieces.
 
You seem to be quite facinated by the word BAL. It gives
you and your buddies tremendous anount of complacence ....
and inner satisfactions... Everything is yollow to the Jaundiced Eyes 
and everything is BAL  to Md. Mostafa Kamal.
 
 
Syed Aslam
 
PS: Your version of  28th Oct 2006 is out and out lie and total distortion of facts
       by Haji Selim & Dr. Iqbal. may be blamed for may other misdeeds, but
       they didn't led October 28th episode. Even Jamaati Sangran didnt say so.
 
       Daily star
                                  http://www.thedailystar.net/2006/10/29/d6102901022.htm
       NayaDiganto:
 
NewAgeBd:
 
None of these papers mention Haji Selim & Dr. Iqbal per se..
Mr. Md. Mostafa Kamal, you have lost all his credibilities..
Lier, lier pants on fire !!!! You pretend that you have stopped
lying, but you have just gotten better at it ....
 
- Show quoted text -


On 4/25/08, Md. Mostafa Kamal <mmk3k@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mr. Aslam,
 
Do you have really a sense of humour?
 
In 28th Oct 2006 BAL's supporters plunged over Jamat's meeting leaded by Haji Selim & Dr. Iqbal. There were no gun shot from Jamat's end. What you're or your reference saying is totally lie. It was infact started by your BAL & not Jamat. If the Jamat's cader shooted 100 rounds of bullets so why there is no casualty by a single bullet shot? It is logical thousands of BAL supporters there & no one hurt by a bullet, how it is possible? As you see your BAL's student wing BCL's male persons brutually attacked on Shima Islam it certainly proves that you & your BAL are totally liars & have no shame. So please at least as you're quite better person than Eng. Shafiq, Arif, Abul then kindly show us sense of humour & abstain from these sort of Propagandas.
 
Thank You All,
 
Md. Mostafa Kamal. 


Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 

Musings from a General

[ The source of the following writeup is an active-duty general in the Bangladesh Army. The author of this piece wishes to remain anonymous for obvious reasons. There are lots of interesting snippets here: a 2006 coup plan, Anwarul Iqbal's exist strategy to the UAE, etc. But I was not aware the Iazuddin has 20 pet dogs or that the government expenditure for those dogs is upsetting some young army officers, but the most important piece of information hinted in this piece explains why Moeen U. Ahmed's tenure as Chief of Staff was extended by one year. We were convinced that MUA will, after his retirement in June, step up to 'rescue' the country. But given the prices of essentials, specially the world-wide shortage of rice, becoming the de-jure ruler of Bangladesh is a no-win situation. So MUA, who is evidently a smart man (yes, I know the joke about Military Intelligence being an oxymoron, too) decided to extend his term by one year and remain the de-facto ruler until then. Does this mean the election will be pushed back until 2009? Generals are allowed to resign and enter politics, so we believe Gen. Ahmed is firmly straddling the fence at this point, but we will not be surprised if "unavoidable circumstances" pushes the election back. J @ ShadaKalo ]
Who Was Behind the Military-backed Government in Bangladesh?
[http://shadakalo.blogspot.com/2008/04/musings-from-general.html#links]

Interesting stories started emanating from the Bangladesh military intelligence sources in Dhaka. The rumor states that Mr. Anwarul Iqbal, who was in-charge of Police Force was asked to withdraw police forces from the 'war zone' on October 28, 2006 where few political activists and demonstrators were beaten to death. A selected few media blamed the 'logi boita' for the deaths while the Awami League leaders claimed and a few private TV channels showed that the Jamat supporters opened fire while shouting 'morle shoheed, bacle gazi' (if you die, you would go to heaven and if you don't die, you become a winner for eternity). His Deputy Police Commissioners repeatedly apprised him of the consequences of withdrawing the police forces and argued that the function of the police force is to maintain law and order. He did not listen to their arguments. As a reward and for his obedience, he was picked up as an Honorable Advisor in the current military-backed emergency government of Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed. Recently, he tried to put the Election Commission under fire by announcing that the Thana and local Parishad elections would be held prior to the national election for which the caretaker government was primarily installed. More interesting, as a precautionary measure, it is reported that Advisor Anwarul Iqbal has recently brought private flats in Dubai and UAE with a view to settle there after the change of the government. If the story is not true, he may submit a detail story on the 28th October incident as well as his income and wealth statement to dispel the rumors.

It is also reported that the British High Commissioner Mr. Anwar Chowdhury managed to diplomatically defeat the U. S. Ambassador Patricia Buetenis who desperately wanted to have the national election in January 2007. She miserably failed as the EU diplomats sided with Mr. Chowdhury and therefore, she was withdrawn within 15 months of her service in Bangladesh. Now she is posted as the Deputy U.S. Ambassador in Iraq. Reportedly, British High Commissioner Mr. Chowdhury was a trusted confidante of the Awami League President Sheikh Hasina and he continually briefed her to stand strong in her demands. At the same time, he advised the BNP-Jamat leadership especially Begum Khaleda Zia not to compromise. He really enjoyed the rivalry of the Begums, the London-based the Economist so aptly enumerated. He earned confidence of Sheikh Hasina as his father was an expatriate Awami League leader in the United Kingdom. He was also close to the inner circle of the BNP leadership especially Mr. Saifur Rahman by being a Sylheti, the most trusted Minister of Khaleda Zia. British Prime Minister Tony Blair appointed Mr. Chowdhury, a Bangladeshi native as the British High Commissioner to Bangladesh to get political support of the Bangladeshi British nationals. In spite of his efforts for another term, he has recently been withdrawn by Foreign Secretary Milliband. Unlike others he stayed there for four years. But the damages that he did to this nation's nascent democracy will remain afresh just like the British Raj's dual policy of divide and rule for years to come.

It is further reported that all arrangements were smartly made to have a military takeover in Bangladesh on October 28th. However Khaleda Zia's political advisor Salahuddin Quader Chowdhury, a shrewd politician that sided with Pakistan in 1971 Liberation War reportedly received information from Pakistan's ISI, the military intelligence forces and quickly foiled such attempt by hurriedly forming a Caretaker government headed by President Iazuddin Ahmed. Once the Caretaker Cabinet was formed, the military found difficulty to take over. President Iazuddin, a very selfish man has no love for the nation or nation's laws and rules other than himself.

When the advisors of the Caretaker government of Iazuddin Ahmed were making progress and getting positive response from the opposing political parties, Dr. Iazuddin Ahmed at the advice of few selected military and civil society leaders obstructed any resolution. It is reported that both the TIB and the CPD got reasonable funding to continue their criticism of political leaders to create public opinion against them without fully knowing that they became a part of the conspiracy. However, CPD's Chief was rewarded with an Ambassadorial post immediately after the installation of the military-backed government that received nearly Tk80 crore British fund.

As the economy is failing under the inept caretaker government composed of foreign trained international bureaucrats and there is no hope of recovery soon, the military is fed up with Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed's government. Last January, four advisors were replaced and additional assistant advisors have recently been appointed to manage the economy. As it is not improving and there is not much hope of a quick fix, General Moeen U. Ahmed, the Army Chief is contemplating of handing over powers to an elected government. No wonder, while addressing the media this week he boldly stated that 'military has no political ambition'. Since last week a few generals have been quietly circulating the above 'untold stories' or 'classified information' as General Ahmed is convinced that leading such chaotic economy would be a bad choice now. However, before leaving the office, like a section of politicians that imported and enjoyed tax-free personal automobiles or made money out of such privilege, Army Chief General Moeen Ahmed rewarded him and his close associates with promotion and extension of service. That mentality of enjoying public benefits has not changed in spite of corruption jihad in the country. The current caretaker government will be over in 8/9 months, but upgrading of selected military ranks will continue even after its departure as the milestones of Fakhruddin government.

It is also reported that President Iazuddin Ahmed has been feeding his 20 pet dogs costing the public exchequer over couple of lac taka each month and as some young and dedicated army officers raised noise due to famine condition in the country, President Iazuddin to silence them extended the tenure of their boss, General Moeen U. Ahmed by a year. Question is; is it the same old 'give and take policy' of past governments in a new bottle? Or is it something new and fresh 'so-called reform' to deprive younger officers?


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.



Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.



Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

!
< /div>


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.



Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

__._,_.___

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Our Bangladesh

What can I say. Its beautiful.

M M R <mole_engineer@yahoo.com> wrote:

Please watch this and send some comments.
Md.Mahmudur Rahman
Uppsala University
Sweden
0046704422705


----- Original Message ----
From: Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo.com>
To: khabor@yahoogroups.com; rehman.mohammad@gmail.com; alochona@yahoogroups.com; mbimunshi@gmail.com; dhakamails@yahoogroups.com; notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2008 11:30:15 AM
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Restoring Democracy in Bangladesh

Restoring Democracy in Bangladesh

Asia Report N°151
28 April 2008
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Bangladesh is under military rule again for the third time in as many decades. Although the caretaker government (CTG) insists its plans to stamp out corruption and hold general elections by December 2008 are on track, its achievements have been patchy, and relations with the major political parties are acrimonious. Efforts to sideline the two prime ministers of the post-1990 democratic period have faltered (though both are in jail), and the government has become bogged down in its attempts to clean up corruption and reshape democratic politics. Even if elections are held on schedule, there is no guarantee reforms will be sustainable. If they are delayed, the risk of confrontation between the parties and the army-backed government will grow. There is an urgent need for all sides to negotiate a peaceful and sustainable return to democracy.
The army's intervention on 11 January 2007 was widely welcomed for preventing a slide into extensive violence. Activists of the opposition Awami League had stepped up street protests against efforts by the outgoing Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP)-led government to rig elections. Clashes had led to some 50 deaths by the end of 2006, and there was no compromise in sight. The CTG, headed by technocrats but controlled by the military, quickly ended street violence and raised hopes of political change, promising to tackle the corruption, nepotism and infighting that had crippled fifteen years of elected governments. It used wide-ranging emergency powers and argued that the exceptional situation, not envisaged by the constitution, legitimised its extended tenure and ambitious program. Its goals attracted support from key international backers.
Some progress is evident. The creation of a new electoral roll, with photographic voter identity cards, is underway; the government has begun to separate the judiciary from the executive; and it has reconstituted the Election and Public Service Commissions Рessential preliminaries to more extensive reforms of the electoral system and the bureaucracy. Its anti-corruption drive has targeted powerful politicians and their prot̩g̩s. Debilitating hartals (general strikes) that sapped business confidence and disrupted daily life have been banned.
However, despite some continued support from civil society and the international community, the government's honeymoon is over. There is now fear the government is undermining the very democratic institutions it set out to rescue. In its first year in power, the government made some 440,000 arrests ostensibly linked to its anti-corruption drive, creating a climate of fear in the country. Its poor handling of the economy and natural disasters has aggravated underlying scepticism over its real intentions. The continued state of emergency and efforts to undermine popular politicians and split their parties have left many questioning its sincerity. Former Prime Ministers Khaleda Zia and Sheikh Hasina weathered clumsy attempts to force them into exile. They are both under detention facing corruption charges but still dominate their parties, and their popularity may get a boost if their prosecutions are seen as unfair.
The Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI), the military intelligence agency and the engine of military government, has been careful to avoid being front and centre, but serving and retired officers have been placed in critical positions, from the Election Commission to the National Coordination Committee heading the anti-corruption drive. Senior officers assert that the army has no desire to get its hands dirty and would rather stay out of politics altogether. They remember the messy collapse of past military regimes and are concerned about their and their army's international reputation and peacekeeping role. Still, there have been persistent signals that the army would like to institutionalise a degree of continuing influence after elections. In any event, it will have difficulty extricating itself from politics with its prestige intact, unless it can negotiate a graceful exit strategy with the parties.
There is an immediate need for dialogue between the government and the main parties. Any viable roadmap for elections and a smooth return to democracy has to be agreed by all major actors. The first step must be to address mistrust between the two sides, as well as the acrimonious relations between the Awami League and BNP. Ideally, a new consensus would not only cover how to hold elections but also develop commitments on post-election behaviour (including sustaining institutional reforms and anti-corruption measures) and democratic functioning (including safeguarding human rights and political pluralism).
Failure to negotiate would invite confrontation. Student unrest in August 2007 showed how quickly frustration with military rule can boil over. Two floods, a devastating cyclone and rising food prices have left many Bangladeshis hungry and the CTG struggling to assert that the politicians it imprisoned on corruption charges would be equally unable to handle the food crisis. If the government cannot bring the politicians along to help it cope with soaring food prices, the parties are likely to channel popular discontent into street protests. This would carry the immediate risk of violent clashes; it would also increase the advantage militant Islamists are already quietly taking from the situation.
International actors who have too placidly accepted the government's rationale and supported its agenda should recognise that the priority is to maintain pressure for timely and credible elections. They should also be prepared to act as a possible guarantor to facilitate a delicate transfer of power and to support a longer-term program of sustainable reforms to put the country's democracy back on track.
RECOMMENDATIONS
To the Caretaker Government (CTG) and the Military:
1.  Lift the state of emergency, including complete cancellation of the Emergency Power Rules (EPR), at least two months ahead of any elections to create conditions conducive for free and fair contests.
2.  Carry out the following steps ahead of elections:
(a)  immediately rescind the emergency ban on all political party activity and freedom of association, as well as press restrictions, and repeal Section 16(2) of the EPR granting immunity from prosecution to the Joint Forces;
(b)  continue good faith efforts to adhere to the election roadmap for parliamentary elections by the end of 2008 at the latest, by setting a specific election date and keeping in mind Islamic holidays to ensure full participation;
(c)  begin discussions immediately with the main political parties on core political issues not addressed in talks between those parties and the Election Commission;
(d)  refrain from using coercive measures to induce and expedite political party reforms and allow sufficient time for party leaders to build support for internal reforms at all levels; and
(e)  desist from anti-corruption arrests without warrants or sufficient evidence.
3.  Disavow the "minus two" policy as part of the political reform process, and in regard to the trials of Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia:
(a)  refrain from interfering and allow them to be held in open court;
(b)  conduct them before the general election;
(c)  ensure they are speedy and verdicts are delivered in time for the accused to stand for late 2008 parliamentary election if found innocent; and
(d)  respect the High Court or High Court of Appeal's verdicts.
4.  Identify and encourage non-partisan national observers to monitor all elections outlined in the roadmap and invite international election observation missions to monitor elections, in consultation with the parties.
To the Parties:
5.  Demonstrate a willingness to reciprocate goodwill gestures by the CTG (such as removal of the ban on party activity) by promoting internal party democracy, rejecting those convicted in corruption cases as candidates and forging consensus on an election code of conduct.
6.  Promote internal party democracy by:
(a)  holding regular elections for all leadership posts at all party levels;
(b)  rewarding committed and effective party workers with greater opportunities to rise through the ranks, including running for office, gaining access to funds and other resources for their candidacies and winning promotions to important committees;
(c)  selecting candidates to stand for elections who enjoy the confidence of their local party workers; and
(d)  determining a quota, in consultation with the Election Commission, for ensuring women's representation at all levels.
7.  Do not boycott the elections, and if they are deemed free and fair by credible observers, accept the results.
To Both the CTG and the Parties:
8.  Seek to ensure a smooth transition to democracy and a credible parliamentary election by December 2008 by entering into a dialogue, with a clearly defined agenda from the start, that aims broadly to:
(a)  achieve a common minimum commitment on sustaining institutional reforms such as the independence of the judiciary, maintaining a non-partisan public service commission and refraining from political interference in police and army promotions and assignments;
(b)  agree on how to ratify actions of the CTG, whether by approving ordinances (which might mean amending current ordinances to make them more acceptable), by a constitutional amendment or by other means;
(c)  ensure a smooth transfer of power after elections, with safeguards against retaliatory prosecutions, demotions or transfers of CTG officials and military officers for administering routine ministerial, government and security functions and formulating and implementing institutional reforms such as the Anti-Corruption Commission, Public Service Commission, judicial and other reforms necessary for strengthening democratic functioning, but without foregoing the state's responsibility under domestic and international law to investigate and prosecute civilian and military officials who have ordered, condoned or directly participated in human rights abuses to enforce the state of emergency;
(d)  consider mechanisms for institutionalising pluralism and empowering opposition voices in parliament such as creating a bicameral legislature; repealing Article 70 of the constitution, which imposes rigid party discipline in the parliament; and ensuring meaningful bipartisan participation in parliamentary committees and working groups; and
(e)  intensify efforts by the next government to: reduce space for radicalism, cooperate in dismantling terrorist groups and tackle any linkages between violent extremists and state institutions, political parties and politicians, and members of the business community, as well as between violent extremists and organised crime or other sources of domestic and international funding.
9.  Include in any agreement a common reiteration of commitment to all fundamental rights, including concrete promises for action in areas such as extrajudicial killings, torture and illegal detention, and protection of minority rights, women's rights and refugee rights.
10.  Hold, upon conclusion of the talks, several roundtable discussions with a wide range of civil society organisations in the six division capitals so as to forge a broader national charter for post-election governance and respect for human rights.
To the International Community, especially Australia, Canada, the European Union, Germany, India, Japan, the UK, UN and U.S.:
11.  Maintain pressure on the CTG to hold timely and credible elections, as well as technical support for the electoral process and unity in public and private messages to the main political actors.
12.  Consider official visits to Bangladesh in the upcoming months at foreign minister or under-secretary- general level to remind the CTG that its legitimacy depends on meeting its elections target, and the army that its international reputation rests on assisting a smooth transfer of power and remaining outside of politics, and ensure that senior visitors also meet with leaders of the main political parties.
13.  Encourage strongly an inclusive dialogue both between the CTG and parties and among the parties, stand ready to assist the resumption of talks if they breakdown and give public support to any agreement reached.
14.  Support non-partisan national election monitoring mechanisms, prepare to send electoral observation missions and agree on benchmarks for credible elections, which likely should include:
(a)  participation by all major parties;
(b)  lifting of the state of emergency at least two months before the elections, including the end of all restrictions on fundamental rights;
(c)  minimal pre-election violence; and
(d)  minimal candidate and voter intimidation by either the CTG, the military or the parties.
15.  Emphasise to the CTG its responsibility to uphold both domestic and international human rights standards, including investigating and holding to account past and present human rights abuses, particularly those committed by the security services, and be prepared to offer technical and financial assistance to Bangladesh's human rights commission.
Dhaka/Brussels, 28 April 2008

http://www.crisisgr oup.org/home/ index.cfm? id=5408&l=1

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

__._,_.___

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___