Banner Advertiser

Sunday, March 8, 2009

[ALOCHONA] Testing times

 
It is not a failure of one institution but a collective one and only by sharing the findings can such incidents be avoided in future. We have far too many secrets and even greater tragedies spawned by such events before and it is time the demand of the people's right to know was seriously respected by all. Half-known truths are as bad as half-truths,
writes Afsan Chowdhury


 

BANGLADESH is passing through an extremely difficult phase where all its institutions are being tested to the full. The incident at the Bangladesh Rifles headquarters has become a rite of passage of sorts for the Bangladesh state to see if it can make through tough times. It faces a strain on all but the greatest challenge is to the relationship the armed forces and the civilian political government have with the Bangladesh state itself.


   The incident has been shaped over several days and continues till today. There was a period of confusion followed by a collective scream of horror as the nature of the incident became clear including the death toll and the manner of the death and disposal of the dead. Like it or not, Bangladeshis should not look upon the horrors of 1971 and think that such acts can only be committed by Pakistanis. At least the Pakistanis claimed no ethnic brotherhood and blood ties with Bengalis but Bangladeshis have shown that their capacity for murder, pillage, rape, loot and defiling of dead bodies outdoes everyone. It is a remarkable display of gruesome hatred and should make us humble and reflect on the beast within us, individually and collectively. The myth about Bengalis being soft and gentle hearted should be removed once and for all; they have proved their murderous intent many times before and now.
   
   Mystery and speculation: half-known and half-truths
   UNANSWERED questions surround the incident and it has mystified national and international circles equally and fuelled much speculation too. Rumours have been many and many have been accused of crimes but without proof till now. Within Bangladesh, they range from accusations of incompetence on the part of the present government to conspiracies hatched by extremist forces to destroy the army to create bad blood between the civil government and the military forces and so on. However, with every statement, the timbre of the state structure is weakened and it might serve everyone best if rash statements were not made by anyone in the government, opposition or elsewhere, including the media. It is time for a touch of restrained tongues.


   It makes little sense to speculate as to what happened or could have happened as the government and the military have both set up investigation committees to find that out. Like others, one hopes that there will be proper coordination between the two committees and full disclosure will follow instead of secret reports. It is not a failure of one institution but a collective one and only by sharing the findings can such incidents be avoided in future. We have far too many secrets and even greater tragedies spawned by such events before and it is time the demand of the people's right to know was seriously respected by all. Half-known truths are as bad as half-truths.
   While we wait to hear what happened and how it happened and who was responsible we would like to devote space to what is known and try to understand from them.
   
   The state is more resilient than thought before
   PERHAPS the most important fact that has transpired from amongst it all is the resilience of the state and its present shape. Foremost is the fact that despite the extreme crisis and provocation, the army did not take over. This in the context of Bangladesh is an unexpected indication of maturity and deserves to be recognised. Bangladesh does have a history of takeovers and even the present government came to power through an army guaranteed election but the army did not give in to emotions and angry reaction and break the barrier.


   In this connection we would like to refer to the clandestine tape recordings of Sheikh Hasina's meeting with the army officers at Senakunja which is making the rounds. Any listening will make it clear that the army officers' principal emotion was that of hurt and primary feeling was that of disappointment that the officers who could be saved weren't.


   At the same time, one can also see how misinformation played a part in building up resentment. The prime minister was asked why she didn't attend a BDR dinner and if it was because there was a security issue. The prime minister replied that she had already informed the BDR chief that due to office work pressure she would not go to the dinner and post-dinner celebrations. She was firm and said this sort of rumours would do no one any good. Although voices were still being raised it was clear that the feeling was not dominantly of anger but wounded feelings and a sense of feeling let down.
   In this encounter, Sheikh Hasina neither lost her cool nor compromised her position as the prime minister. She also behaved like an 'older sister' and one supposes this approach suited the situation very much and it served both. While facing the unhappy officers, Hasina also defended her own position and that of her government in handling the crisis actively. It sounded like an honest exchange and the airing of grievances which was certainly a positive thing. The fact that no hostility was evident is significant. It was a critical moment in the crisis that in the end cleared much of the cobwebs and the gloom. The next step now is to find out what happened and why.
   
   Scapegoating and demonising won't help the cause
   THERE is unfortunately a bit of scapegoat finding that is going on and much of the attention is going towards the home minister Sahara Khatun's way which is unfair. There is no precedent of handling such a situation and all those that happened before were handled no better. The home minister displayed great courage by going in and negotiating. Also, to think that she alone was taking all the decisions is not right. However, there are many forces and institutions who need to explain their conduct and competence and she certainly is not the first on the line.


   As has been mentioned several times, there is unease about the failure of intelligence agencies. Of course, given the history of such agencies and their failures everywhere, one should also not be over judgemental but it should be a lesson to them that intimidating civilians is relatively easy compared to taking care of national security and one should prioritise appropriately the tasks one handles.This is the time to be analytical and one hopes that everyone else will do so because it is easy to catch the bus to quick judgement. It applies to all because the crisis is not of a single institution but the state machinery.
   
   The positives of the situation
   AMIDST all the anxiety and acrimony there are certain positives that need to be respected. First and foremost, despite all the tension and pressure, the army didn't take over. This is a sign of a maturity that perhaps was missing even a few years back. It means that the civil-military alliance in Bangladesh has firmed up and this is now much more of a fellow travelling. The chief of army obviously played a critical role in this.


   The decision not to take the BDR headquarters by force is probably the best decision taken by calm heads because such a decision could have exploded into large-scale violence and that would have been impossible to calm down. Thousands of armed people roaming in a state of conflict may well have been impossible to control and one dreads to think what that would have led to. That it wasn't followed is another positive example.


   Several forces from the police to the army to the BDR and Ansars exist without a clear description of who they are. What constitutes the military and the paramilitary and the others must be defined and detailed for what appears to be a case of inadequate management. Such forces exist in India and Pakistan; so, one needs to learn how it needs to be handled.


   Two investigation committees are looking into the violent incident but there is a very strong need to look into the structural problems that contributed to this disaster. One has to explore what the real grievances of the mutineers are and what instigations from within or outside were there because a grievance leading to carnage is an extreme disconnect that has to be put in place.


   Also, it should certainly not become a military-versus-paramilitary conflict. In the backdrop of the large-scale killing, rage will exist but it is the responsibility of the leaders to ensure that due process is followed and rights of all are respected. There should be a fair trial and everything needs to be done to ensure that such decision are beyond the boundaries of revenge. Victimisation has to be avoided if the gains made now are to be made permanent.


   Demonisation of the identified mutineers will be there naturally but the BDR should not be demonised as they are a state force. It belongs to Bangladesh and it is again the duty of the concerned to return it to its original level of competence and integrity. That is why a wide enough enquiry has to be held to find out how many BDR men were involved and why. If a large number were involved, it becomes an institutional issue and must be dealt with decisions beyond trial and punishment. It becomes a matter of reform and restructuring not just trying killers.


   The mutiny was meant to foil democracy, people say. For the moment, Bangladesh seems to have survived but one has to make sure that it continues to do so.

http://www.newagebd.com/2009/mar/09/edit.html




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] What’s happening in Bangladesh?

What's happening in Bangladesh?

 
From the 25th of February, disturbing news started coming in from Bangladesh. The Pilkhana headquarters of Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) in Dhaka was seized by a mutiny and at least sixty-four army officers along with seven non-army personals including women and children were massacred by the mutineers. The dead includes the BDR chief Major General Shakil Ahmed and other high ranking officers. The killings mainly happened in the 'Darbar Hall' inside the BDR premise during the annual gathering of BDR commanders and according to the few survivors most of the killings were done between 9:30 to 10:30 a.m. on the first day.
 
After killing the senior officers, the mutineers stormed the residential officer's quarters, attacked and dragged out the family members and set the quarters on fire. Gold ornaments, jewelries and money were looted. The dead bodies were disfigured with bayonets and later dumped into nearby sewers and mass graves inside the BDR compound. The full horror of the mutiny became evident when bodies of the slain officers including the wife of the Director General were recovered. The mutiny was also reported to have spread to twelve border districts of the country including Dinajpur, Chittagong, Rajshahi and Naugaon.

Intense rumors of an imminent army take-over soon spread out like wildfire all over Bangladesh. But according to media report, the army chief Moin Ahmed assured Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina by saying that "Rumors are swirling… but the army belongs to you." His force remained loyal to the civilian government which took over power just in December last year after a landslide victory in the general elections. This assurance reinforced the government to deal with the situation with firm resolve. It was Hasina's insistence for a political solution of the crisis that the army kept itself away from any direct confrontation with the mutineers.
 
Sheikh Hasina herself met fourteen representative leaders of the BDR rebels and after discussing their grievances initially announced to grant them amnesty. Various leaders and ministers including the Home Minister Sahara Khatun were busy throughout the night to keep dialogues between the government and rebel soldiers open. In a daring act, Ms. Khatun and State Minister Jahangir Kabir Nanak entered the BDR premise at midnight and rescued an injured officer and forty family members who were held hostage by the rebels. However, when all sorts of negotiation failed to make the mutineers to surrender, the government strategically started mobilizing the Army on the second day. Eleven tanks moved in to encircle the Pilkhana complex; people living near the BDR headquarters were evacuated. Hasina addressed the nation in a televised statement and appealed to the troops to surrender the arms. Finally, on 26th of February between 4:30 to 6:00 p.m. the unnerved rebels surrendered by laying down their arms. By then, many of the rebel soldiers had fled their posts. Two hundred mutineers were arrested while trying to escape in civilian outfits.
 
The police started a massive manhunt 'Operation Rebel Hunt' throughout the country to capture the fugitive masterminds of the revolt and soon arrested BDR's Deputy Assistant Director Touhidul Alam and four other suspects. According to an official estimate, about two thousand suspected mutineers are still absconding. The government later clarified that the general amnesty announced by Sheikh Hasina will not be applicable for the masterminds who was directly involved with the planning and killings.

Formerly known as East Pakistan Rifles, BDR is presently a 67,000-strong paramilitary force deployed to guard the 4,427 kilometer long Bangladesh boarders with India and Myanmar with additional anti-smuggling operational charge. The force revolted in 1971 against the West Pakistan army by joining the Bangladesh liberation war. After the emergence of Bangladesh the force was renamed as Bangladesh Rifles and emerged as the new country's leading paramilitary force. BDR administration is mostly controlled by officers from the Bangladesh Army.

Rebel leaders speaking to private television channels affirmed that the mutiny was directed primarily against the corruption of their officers who came from the army. According to them, the other central reasons of the uprising were the disparity of pay, benefits, working conditions and promotional opportunities as compared to their army counterparts. Their 22-point demand includes withdrawal of army officers from the command structure of BDR. The mutineers were initially successful to represent the uprising as a class conflict between exploitive officers and exploited soldiers and accused the officers as abusive and utterly insensitive towards the woes of ordinary soldiers. They claimed that their long-standing grievances were repeatedly raised before the authorities but all fell on deaf ears. Unofficial reports suggested that BDR Director General had promised to discuss their grievances with Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina but failed to keep his promise when Hasina visited the barracks on 24 February to inaugurate the BDR week events. The uprising might be partly impulsive though there are ample reasons to suggest that there could be a 'deep-rooted conspiracy' behind it.

Since Bangladesh was born in 1971 there were several big and small coup attempts in the country. The country's history of army coups started in 1975 when Sheikh Hasina's father, the country's iconic founder president Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was brutally assassinated along with his wife and three sons by junior officers of Bangladesh army. Given its history of coups and counter coups, the first thing that obviously appeared in the mind from the uprising was that the country was heading for another coup. The present army leadership's credible pro-democracy stance has negated this proposition. The cross-border theory of a 'bigger conspiracy' involving Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) which has strong pockets of influence in the BDR came next. It suggested that the violence was the handiwork of the ISI, aimed to spoil growing ties between Sheikh Hasina's government and India. The ISI also wanted to signal India about its capability to stall New Delhi's growing influence in Bangladesh.
 
Indian media came up with the story of Salauddin Qadeer Chowdhury, a senior Bangladeshi businessman and BNP politician. Involving Chowdhury with the conspiracy for having close links with the ISI, the media reports also stated that the original planning was hatched in Pakistan and then passed on to radical Islamist organizations operating in Bangladesh like the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al Islami (HUJI). Differing to the Indian side story, conspiracy theories were floated within Bangladesh which claimed that India's external intelligence agency RAW was involved to revenge the death of nineteen of their Border Security Force (BSF) personals killed by the BDR at Padua of Sylhet and Boraibari of Roumary in 2001. The name of Britain based Islamist organization Hizb-ut-Tahrir also popped up which for the last couple of years is known to reckon Bangladesh as its area of interest.

Was it really a deliberate and well crafted attempt to incite the army to apply force, take over power and subsequently destabilize the new democratically elected government? Questions were asked why the mutineers had brutally killed the officers and their family members instead of following the usual method to accomplish their demands by holding the army officers as hostages. The modus operandi of the uprising and latest developments emerging from the investigation is supporting this speculation. Investigators have started gathering evidences which are contrary to the initial perception that the uprising stemmed out of grievances.
 
The perpetrators might have exploited the deprived feelings of the common BDR men and motivated a section of them in the heinous act. Latest revelation from the investigation hints about the presence of uniformed outsiders during the massacre. BDR soldiers who had fled Pilkhana through the back doors and now reporting back are claiming that masked soldiers brandishing guns and firing blank shots forced them to join the revolt. Whatever might be the truth, one thing is certain. The evolving events do suggest that Hasina's government is fronting an extremely intricate problem to deal with. It has to move cautiously otherwise the ramification could turn disastrous.

Sheikh Hasina's well-known pro-India stand has caused enough displeasure to the pro-Pakistan elements of Bangladesh. Fingers of suspicion are been pointed towards the fundamentalist Jamaat-e-Islami, their extensive network of grassroot organizations and the former Razakar and Al-Badars – who has regrouped within the Jamaat fold. These are the atrocious elements that had collaborated with the Pakistan Army during the nine months long Bangladesh's Mukti Juddho (liberation war) and staged the mass genocide of millions of their own people and enforced million others to flee to neighboring India as refugees.
 
After Mujibur Rahman was assassinated, Zia Ur Rahman helped to resettle these Islamist collaborators in Bangladesh politics. He legalized Jamaat-e-Islami as a political party, allowed them to carry on with their vicious socio-political activities and had also permitted Jamaat leader Golam Azam to return to Bangladesh from his exile. Azam's citizenship was previously nullified by Mujibur Rahman for his resolute opposition to creation of Bangladesh.. After the resettlement, Jamaat-e-Islami continued to flourish and strengthened their base at the time of General Hossain Mohammad Ershad's regime in areas like Chittagong, Sylhet and Rajshahi and steadily became politically important in Bangladesh. Jamaat allied with Zia Ur Rahman's wife Khaleda Zia's Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), lead a four-party coalition government during 2001-2006 and held two Ministries in the government.
 
 There is little doubt that Jamaat-e-Islami has a sizeable presence in the country's rural areas and their fanatic Mullahs has infested enough Pan-Islamic religious extremism and hatred among the illiterate and poor populace. The BDR rank and file is drawn mainly from these economically backward and poor rural belts.

These elements are infuriated and deeply worried about Hasina's plans to set up a war-crimes tribunal to put on trial the collaborators of West Pakistani army. In the second week of February, Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari had sent his special envoy to Dhaka and pressurized the Bangladesh government to retract from the trial which the government immediately turned down. By pulling the ear, the head comes along – besides a number of Jamaat leaders, some of the bigwigs of Khaleda Zia's BNP could also be in genuine trouble if the government goes ahead with the trial.
 
Hasina has also announced that she will not allow Bangladesh's soil to be used as a haven for terrorist activities. Her government has promised to eliminate terrorist camps in Bangladesh and to restrain ISI operations from Bangladesh territory. All these factors are enough to incite rage and enmity among co-religionist and Pan-Islamic elements against the present government and army leadership. From their extremist inspiration these elements apparently might have tried to send a warning to the government that it should restrain implementing their agenda.

Historically, Bangladesh's political style has always been marked by its confrontational nature. This style of politics was introduced during the liberation movement when the political class, bureaucrats, army, students, elites and intellectuals became divided either into pro-liberation or pro-Pakistan camps. This hate-inspired division has eventually created a gravely corrupt political system and weak institutions. This sense of hatred has been aggravated by centralization of power in the hands of the executive class. Taking advantage of the chaotic state of Bangladesh politics that prevailed following the assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the army directly got involved into the political sphere to play the role of the savior, fingered external relations and consequently demolished the democratic values.. The subsistence of successive post-Mujib regimes heavily depended on the army support. The present army leadership appears to be committed for democratic values and is free from Islamist bias. This is a positive sign for Bangladesh's future in contrast to the lopsided role the army has opted so far.

Bangladesh is still one of the poorest countries in the world. Concentrating on the precarious economic situation is therefore the utmost job of the new government. Sanitizing a corrupt political system and standing firm against rampant corruption in the high offices is also another major objective to attain. It also needs to carefully address the menace of religious fundamentalist elements in its society. Whether in Bangladesh, India or Pakistan, the face of religious fundamentalism is common. It is always autocratic, brutal and driven primarily by hatred. In a society where most of the people are illiterate and miserably trapped in poverty and religious inducement, the incidence of the BRD mutiny will remain a matter of deep concern.



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Gen. rafiq in helicopter crash


Bangladesh army general dies in helicopter crash
09 Mar 2009 04:10:10 GMT
Source: Reuters
DHAKA, March 9 (Reuters) - A Bangladesh army major general and a lieutenant colonel were killed when their helicopter crashed on Monday, police said. Major General Rafiqul Islam, commander of Jessore cantonment, and Lt. Colonel Shahidul Islam, who was piloting the helicopter, died when it crashed in Tangail nearly 100 kilometers (63 miles) north of Dhaka, police officer Anisul Haque said. A major on board the helicopter was seriously injured and has been hospitalised. No other details were available immediately. (Reporting by Serajul Islam Quadir; Editing by Jerry Norton)









__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Re: [dhakamails] IAF on stand-by, ready to help Bangladesh

firstly, present situation in bangladesh do not ask for any military assistance from abroad without having tried bangladesh army.
 
secondly, keeping in mind the drama staged by india with commitment to 500,000 tons of rice on the occassion of a recent natural calamity in bangladesh, who on earth will ask for india's help?
 
someone willing to help is not what bangladesh needs. rather someone who is likely to help at bangladesh's interest is.

--- On Mon, 3/9/09, Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo.com>
Subject: [dhakamails] IAF on stand-by, ready to help Bangladesh
To: zoglul@hotmail.co.uk, shahin72@gmail.com, janashah_1@yahoo.com, alfazanambd@yahoo.com, adelm@uapb.edu, hossain.khilji@yahoo.com, mbimunshi@gmail.com, rehman.mohammad@gmail.com, farhadmazhar@hotmail.com, mahmudurart@yahoo.com, kmamalik@aol.com, dhakamails@yahoogroups.com, khabor@yahoogroups.com, alochona@yahoogroups.com, bdresearchers@yahoogroups.com, bangla-vision@yahoogroups.com, mouchakaydheel@yahoo.com, delwar98@yahoo.com, odhora@yahoogroups.com, ayeshakabir@yahoo.com, sayantha15@yahoo.com, minarrashid@yahoo.com, history_islam@yahoogroups.com, tuhin0930@yahoo.com
Date: Monday, March 9, 2009, 9:29 AM

IAF on stand-by, ready to help Bangladesh
 
 
With Bangladesh caught in a bloody turmoil after the two-day mutiny by a disgruntled border security force last week, the Indian Air Force (IAF) has been put on standby to render assistance to the neighbouring country, if required.  The IAF's transport bases, equipped with IL-76 heavy-lift and AN-32 medium-lift aircraft, have been asked to stay prepared for any commitment to Bangladesh whose fragile civilian government is coming to terms with the rebellion by the paramilitary Bangladesh Rifles (BDR).
 
A senior IAF official, who refused to be identified, told Hindustan Times on Sunday the force was ready to provide logistics as well as humanitarian help."We follow some drills whenever there is any instability or calamity in neighbourhood. Bangladesh returned to democratic rule barely two months ago," a source in the air headquarters said.
 
The IAF had flown relief supplies to Bangladesh in November 2007, under Operation Sahayta, after a devastating cyclone tore through the country's western coast leaving thousands dead and millions homeless.
 
In a stand-by scenario, the air force prioritises its commitments to make sure that assets are available at any given time for speedy deployment. The focus was on conserving assets to deal with any eventuality, said another official. It could also entail curbing leave temporarily to ensure availability of air crews.
 
The IAF's transport base at Jorhat in Assam is the closest to Bangladesh. It is also one of the biggest transport bases of the force.
 
The mutinous guards went on a shooting spree at BDR's officer corps at an annual meeting where troops were supposed to discuss grievances with the seniors. The rebels wanted among other things better pay, change in the command and control structure and permission to be part of lucrative UN peacekeeping missions.
 
homeurl=http: //www.samachar. com&nextids=3754446| 3754447|3754448| 3754449|3754450&nextIndex=0




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Re: [khabor.com] BDR Mutiny: A handy work of who?

It can be ISI, RAW, Smugglers, JMB or Bangladeshi Politicians. We don't know but we need to analyze the events of 25th and 26th as that's the only option we are left with because the main culprits are gone. Even a dumb ones may have left the country.
1. PM refuses military action in favor of political solution. Takes hours to continue her negotiation while the rebels keep on killing. 
2. In cantonment, when asked about the promise to send the military to the slain DG of BDR by an officer who survived, the PM didn't have an answer. Please listen carefully, the tone of voice. She told the hostages that the military was on their way while outside she was looking for political solution.
2. After 40/50 hours of continuous killing,  the tired rebels decided to leave Pilkhana with no obstruction from the politically sensitive government. How many of them got caught? None.
Why?



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] IAF on stand-by, ready to help Bangladesh

IAF on stand-by, ready to help Bangladesh
 
 
With Bangladesh caught in a bloody turmoil after the two-day mutiny by a disgruntled border security force last week, the Indian Air Force (IAF) has been put on standby to render assistance to the neighbouring country, if required.  The IAF's transport bases, equipped with IL-76 heavy-lift and AN-32 medium-lift aircraft, have been asked to stay prepared for any commitment to Bangladesh whose fragile civilian government is coming to terms with the rebellion by the paramilitary Bangladesh Rifles (BDR).
 
A senior IAF official, who refused to be identified, told Hindustan Times on Sunday the force was ready to provide logistics as well as humanitarian help."We follow some drills whenever there is any instability or calamity in neighbourhood. Bangladesh returned to democratic rule barely two months ago," a source in the air headquarters said.
 
The IAF had flown relief supplies to Bangladesh in November 2007, under Operation Sahayta, after a devastating cyclone tore through the country's western coast leaving thousands dead and millions homeless.
 
In a stand-by scenario, the air force prioritises its commitments to make sure that assets are available at any given time for speedy deployment. The focus was on conserving assets to deal with any eventuality, said another official. It could also entail curbing leave temporarily to ensure availability of air crews.
 
The IAF's transport base at Jorhat in Assam is the closest to Bangladesh. It is also one of the biggest transport bases of the force.
 
The mutinous guards went on a shooting spree at BDR's officer corps at an annual meeting where troops were supposed to discuss grievances with the seniors. The rebels wanted among other things better pay, change in the command and control structure and permission to be part of lucrative UN peacekeeping missions.
 
homeurl=http://www.samachar.com&nextids=3754446|3754447|3754448|3754449|3754450&nextIndex=0



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Himalayan dams pose threat to Bangladesh

Himalayan dams pose threat to Bangladesh

India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bhutan have planned a total of 552 hydropower projects in Himalayan region, of which some have already been built and some are under construction, that may have far-reaching impacts on downstream Bangladesh, informed sources said.

Himalayan region is the centre point from where scores of small and large Asian rivers originated and run through. The Indus, Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Irabati are some of those. Bangladesh shares water of 54 rivers with India and 3 with Myanmar.

"If those upstream countries divert normal water flow through these dams, it will dry up many Bangladeshi rivers ruin irrigation system, kill lives in the water bodies. On the other hand, if they do not manage water properly it will inundate a big part of the country during rainy season," Joint River Commission (JRC) Member Mir Sajjad Hossen told The New Nation.

A study of the 'International Rivers', an US based non-governmental organisation that protects rivers and defends the rights of communities, revealed that India has already built 74 dams, Nepal 15, Pakistan 6 and Bhutan 5 in Himalayan region in the recent years. It also found that 37 Indian, 7 Pakistani and 2 Nepalese dam are under construction in that area. The study also identified that India has planned to build 318 dams, Nepal 37, Pakistan 35 and Bhutan 16 more dams in this region to add over 1,50,000 Megawatts (MW) of additional electricity capacity in the next 20 years.

Sajjad Hossen said that the proposed and under construction dams, Tipaimukh dam is one of those, will change downstream flows, affecting agriculture and fisheries and threatening livelihoods of many people in Bangladesh.

"These countries are supposed to share information with Bangladesh before taking any such step of building new dams, but they are not doing so. We have asked them for information. What we can do if they do not obey the river interlinking rules," said Hossen expressing helplessness against upstream powerful countries.

Former vice-chancellor of University of Dhaka Prof Moniruzzaman Miah said the attempts to build and already under construction dams and barrages in the Himalayan region is the part of India's plan to dry Bangladesh and turn it to desert.

He said nearly 15 rivers in the southeastern region of Bangladesh already become dry due to the dams built in Himalayan region. Existing dames and construction of newer dams will be disastrous for downstream Bangladesh.

The author of the 'Mountains of Concrete: Dam Building in the Himalayas' Shripad Dharmadhikary wrote: "If all the planned capacity expansion materialises, the Himalayan region could possibly have the highest concentration of dams in the world. This dam building activity will fundamentally transform the landscape, ecology and economy of the region and will have far-reaching impacts all the way down to the river deltas."

Bhutan is planning a capacity expansion of about 10,000 MW in the next 10 years. Among the projects being planned for the near future are the 1,095 MW Puntansangchu-I and the 600 MW Mangdechhu projects.

Nepal is planning to install hydropower capacity of 22,000 MW in the coming years. For its own needs, Nepal plans to add 1,750 MW by the year 2020-2021, mostly through small and medium projects. Rest, mainly from the bigger projects, is planned for selling power to India. Pakistan has plans to add 10,000 MW through five projects by the year 2016. Another 14 projects totalling about 21,000 MW are under study for construction by 2025. The government is pushing for the immediate implementation of the massive 4,500 MW Diamer-Bhasha project.

India declared its intentions with the launching of the "50,000 MW Initiative" on May 24, 2003. This initiative fast tracked hydropower development by taking up time-bound preparation of the Preliminary Feasibility Reports (PFRs) of 162 new hydroelectric schemes totalling around 50,000 MW. India has plans to build this capacity by 2017 and then, in the 10 years following, to add another 67,000 MW of hydropower. Construction is ongoing for many of the projects including the 2,000 MW Lower Subansiri project, the 400 MW Koteshwar project and the 1,000 MW Karcham Wangtoo, to name a few. Many of these projects are already under construction.

Due to various obstacles of dams, barrages and hydropower projects in Himalayan region, the source of water of rivers, Bangladesh get lesser water in rivers flowing throughout the country. The lean water flow in the rivers has already cast negative impact on ecology, aquatic life, and irrigation.

According to the Ganges treaty, signed in 1996, Bangladesh and India will equally share water if water flow is up to 70,000 cusec or less in the Farakka barrage point. Bangladesh will get 35,000 cusec of water and India will get the rest if water at Farakka point is between 70,000 and 75,000 cusec.

If water at Frakka point reaches more than 75,000 cusec, India will get 40,000 cusec and Bangladesh will get the rest. But India never followed these terms and conditions of the accord and released meagre quantity of water for Bangladesh, it was alleged.

The JRC statistics shows that Bangladesh did not get its proper share of water since signing of the treaty. In 1999 Bangladesh got 1,033 cusec of water at Teesta barrage point against its normal requirements of 10,000 cusec of water. After JRC meeting in 2000 the water flow rose to 4,530 cusec, in January 2001 it reduced to 1406 cusec, in January 2002 to 1,000 cusec, in January 2003 to 1,100 cusec, in November 2006 to 950 cusec, in January 2007 to 525 cusec and in January 2008 to 1,500 cusec.

Due to less quantum of water supply through Teesta barrage thousands of acres of land in the country's northern districts lack irrigation posing threat to Boro rice cultivation. Around 15 small rivers are also drying up and about to die due to the same reason. The Teesta River itself becomes a thin canal for less volume of water supply from the upper riparian Indian part. The rivers include: Kortoa, Dudhkomol, Jingira, Dhorla, Bangali, Ghaghot, Atrai, Akhira, Manas, Katakhali, Ichamoti, Punorvoba, Burighora and Dhauk also drying due to less water supply. WDB officials said sustainability of these rivers is impossible unless India supplies adequate water through the barrage.

Executive Engineer of Water Development Board (WDB) Atiqur Rahman said they need 10,000 cusec of water to run smooth irrigation but at present they are getting only 1 thousand to 1.5 thousands cusec of water at the barrage point.

http://nation.ittefaq.com/issues/2009/03/09/news0711.htmhttp://nation.ittefaq.com/issues/
2009/03/09/news0711.htm



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] FW: ICC unveil new one day cricket uniform..

  For all my cricket-loving friends all over the subcontinent ----
              --- with a laugh and a tear --- and a resolve to salvage what we love from savagery.
 
                --- Farida Majid
 


To:
From:
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:57:32 -0800
Subject: ICC unveil new one day cricket uniform..


 







www.FunAndFunOnly.net









Windows Live™ Groups: Create an online spot for your favorite groups to meet. Check it out.

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Bongobondhu the title

Dear Alochoks,
 
We should put Sheikh shaheb on trial for his attempt to kill the democracy in BD.  That way the title Bongobondho could be removed from his name.  Bongobondho can not be a good role model for our future generation.  There are many Awami party leaders who supported BAKSAL and are still alive, they should be punished so the history won't repeat itself.  Our president is also a former BAKSAL supporter.  Many political opponents were killed when they protested against BAKSAL.  I am not writing this because I support other political parties besides AL.  I believe AL is not good for Bangladesh.  History should constantly remind old and new generation that Sheikh Shaheb was not a good administrator and a failed leader.  As patriots of BD we must accept this truth only then we can go forward.  May people of the world leave in peace and harmony and may all Bangladeshi people love and respect each other. 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] A billion dollar question



Has Bangladesh Army paid enough price for making wrong headed(declared by court) PM or will have to pay more? How much people will have to pay if she remains five year?



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Bongosena

Hi dear...

Read the news on the following link..Tilled "Bidroher sujog nite opare Bongosenara totporota barasse."
 

And please also read the article given bellow...

Continuing Instances of the Big Brother's Furies

The latest of BSF (Border Security Force of India) intrusion into Bangladesh territory in the northern area at Panchagarh and taking three human lives including a sleeping children at dead of 10 P.M. night on the 17th November though nothing uncommon is a typical of what such inhuman and barbarous killings they have been perpetrating on and on since decades. At some instances apologies are made, flag meetings or full representative meetings between the BSF and the BDR (Bangladesh Rifles), engaged to keep international border secure, are held ending in vague promises not to go for excesses by any side, but unfortunately the fact remained that the BSF more often than not continue to make excesses and killings of innocent children of Bangladesh in their operations as the 17th November one was all about.
It may be worthwhile to recall back some of the inhuman acts perpetrated recently not all on their own folly or egoism but having had signs of aggressive intentions of their government realized through the BSF operations of various manifestations.
The geographical Vulnerability:
The geographical shape and existence of Bangladesh though has a long historic past for centuries, the shape and size of it as of now in the post 1971 period remains exactly what the people of this land area had curved out in 1947, the year and time the British had left off giving independence from the colonial rule. Some self-seeking leaders based then at Kolkata by conspiring and denying the whole Bengal and Assam out of the clutches of post 1947 India made Bangladesh's geographical vulnerability an unfortunate reality. Even so, being together with West Pakistan, the geographical vulnerability had not been as acute as the Big Brother had constantly to care for any thrust from their side. The 1971 episode and the resulting independence of Bangladesh established in the soil and geographical locality of East Pakistan made things different. The position of sovereign equality that provided mutual respectability withered away into what is the current position not only of vulnerability of the small brother in 'truncated and moth-eaten' geographical entity but also to big brotherly dominance and small brotherly helplessness.
Difficulties for Bangladesh in preserving the 4,156 km border with India:
The BDR (Bangladesh Rifles) of Bangladesh just as the previous EPR has been engaged to preserve and secure the land and river border of 4,156 km (Land 3,976, river 180 km) with India, and merely 271 with Myanmar (land 208 km and river 63 km) (Bangladesh Defence Journal, September, p.22). India has their BSF (Border Security Forces) on the other side of the common border. However, encounters and shootings, wounding and killing by the BSF men of BDR are almost everyday matter. Similarly, civilians are also being kidnapped, wounded and killed in one pretext or the other. The amazing aspect of all such untoward incidents is that being Big Brother they normally show arrogance in all such happenings.
All time upgrading of the BSF for creating fear psychosis in Bangladesh:
Compared to India Bangladesh is a tiny entity not only in geographical area but also in all matters. It is as such only natural that India has no worry for its defense, much less the defense of its border with India by the much bigger BSF. Even so, she has lately been upgrading the BSF with latest Israeli Arms like (1) Super Rifle, (2) Assault Rifle, ( 3) M 16 Assault Rifle, (4) MPG-1 Sniper Rifle (5) MP-5 Sub Machine Gun. They are also bringing Targetory Instrument, Laser Crowdy Night Vision (Ibid, 2008, p. 19).
One must wonder, do they need so much of strengthening of the BSF? Why? To face up to the BDR? Or to keep there all time fear psyche not only among the BDR but also among the border area people?
New intelligence unit of India working inside Bangladesh:
According a report published in the above quoted publication, it is known that a new intelligence unit of India has been working inside Bangladesh, in addition, not only recently but also during the post 1947 period their central and powerful intelligence agency, R&AW to sift out almost everything of State secret matters. The agency is known as the Trans Frontier Intelligence Agency or in abbreviated as TIA (Ibid, p.19). They have been collecting information about the Bangladesh Army and BDR to boost up the morale of the BSF.
Anti-Bangladesh organizations working inside India:
There had been anti- East Pakistan elements and organizations based mainly in Kolkata and Agartala in pre 1971 days. But the immediate post 1971 period scarcely had any such for the fact and expectation of the Bengali people there that the 1971 war would do way with the 'artificial border' and so until 1975 there activities were almost nothing. But as soon as the 1975 August revolution that followed the decisive 7 November revolution of Bangladesh got the overwhelming people's support and success, the Indians started to view new Bangladesh with a quite different attitude. And so they started many organizations to humble Bangladesh.
The first of the anti-Bangladesh movement started to work on the 15th August 1977, the second anniversary of Sheikh Mujib's death, pioneered by Chitta Ranjan Sutar, former Awami League M.P. who since after 1971 not only stayed back in Kolkata but also at times met the Indian P.M. Indira Gandhi to fully annex Bangladesh into Indian union. Indira did tell him that that was not feasible right then. That is why he stayed back and waited for the opportune moment. Mujib's fall from power in Dhaka gave Sutar an opportunity. The Bangabhumi Movement was Sutar's brainchild who initiated the movement as a launching ground not only to curve out about one thirds of the western Bangladesh but continue to put pressure against Bangladesh. To put inertia and add to the strength of the movement Sutar had Sheikh Hasina, daughter of Mujib then in exile in India attended the first meeting as that happened to be her father's second death anniversary (M.T.Hussain, Daily Dinkal, Dhaka,15th August 2008). The plea for the Bangabhumi was advanced by Sutar for resettling the displaced Hindus of post 1947 and post Bangladesh period.
Keeping with Sutar's strategy several other organizations have been organized there. They are (1) Liberation Tigers of Bangladesh, (2) Hindu Republic of Birbango etc. These organizations have their cultural and in some cases armed units aiming to materialize goals of the main political organizations. They are (1) Nikhil Banga Nagarik Sangha (All Bengal Citizens Organization), (2) All India Refuge Front, (3) Bangladesh Udbastu Kallyan Parishad (Bangladesh Refugee Welfare Council), (4) Bangladesh Udbashtu Unnayan Sangshad (5) Hindu Bangali Gano Parishad, etc. Other known leaders are Kalidas Baidya of Bongosena and Sukumar Guhothakurha of Hindu Republic of Birbongo Movement.
These front organizations issues and distributes leaflets, posters etc. not only there in West Bengal and Tripura but also inside Bangladesh. They have their workers and contact fifth columnists here inside Bangladesh.
While the facts are that anti-Bangladesh groups have been working from inside Indian Territory, possibly with full knowledge and connivance of Delhi and Kolkata, they have been blaming Bangladesh to give shelter to anti-Indian elements stationed inside Bangladesh. Could that be believable for Bangladesh is a much smaller and vulnerable entity?
Push in of poor Indian Bengali Muslims into Bangladesh:
It is not only that the poor and vulnerable Muslims of India are being ill-treated in all rights there from education to employment, business and vocations. In addition, many such are driven out from India and pushed into Bangladesh through the border areas. The recent torture, annihilation, destruction and burning down of homesteads and killing of Bengali speaking Muslims of Assam have been well known and had media attention all over the world. According to a reliable statistics, the push in attempts by the BSF from 2003 to July 2008 recorded at 211 and persons pushed into Bangladesh had a figure of 3,448. In three months from February 2008 to April 2008, the BSF attempted 2 push in, and persons pushed in stood at 13.
Should not the Bangladeshis ask where has their love of 1971 gone and withered away?
Bangladeshis killed and injured by BSF:
Random shooting at and killing of simple minded and poor Bangladeshis is almost a routine matter of the Indian BSF. The reasons advanced for such killings by the BSF are that they had been either 'intruders' or 'smugglers', hardly substantiated by facts. During the period five years and a half from 2003 to July 2008 the BSF killed 335 Bangladeshis and injured by shooting 228. Along with the BSF, the Indian civilians as well joined hands in killing and injuring Bangladeshis in the border areas. Such killing and injuring of Bangladeshis by Indian civilians stood at 66 and 67 respectively during the same period of five years and a half. The same source recorded that from February to April 2008, 20 persons were killed and 19 injured in three months; and from May to July 19 killed including 2 BDR personnel and injured 17 during another three months.
In another report published in the above journal issue that was jointly compiled by Maj (R) Ashrafuzzaman, Maj (R) Khalil Bin Wahid and Maj (MAJ Wadud Didar recorded additional figures and facts about abductions (675), arrests (513), missing (82, rape (10) and looting (61) by the BSF during 2000 to July 2008. Previous to the period from 1990 to 1999 a total of 206 had been killed and 158 injured) (Ibid, p.23).
Encounters between the BSF and the BDR in the border area are almost regular matters. The recent killing of BDR's Havildar Abdul Hannan and of Lance Naik Krishna Pada Das are well on record (Ibid, p.24).
At times the BSF men enters deep into Bangladesh territory, kill any one they wish to, even children not spared in their fury, and at times, take away dead body/s making issues not to return dead body/s for burial by relatives here in Bangladesh.
It is not correct to say though that no Indians have been killed and injured in encounters, but the fact remained that Indian sides engage themselves almost all the time in aggressive and egoistic attitudes for their claim in attaining the position of Big Brother in 1971 thus tending to care or respect very little the dignity of the people of Bangladesh, much less the sovereign equality of Bangladesh.
Clandestine intrusion of arms and ammunitions for destabilizing Bangladesh:
Since the Big Brother has not been able as yet fully grab Bangladesh, and there is no possibility to contain Bangladesh's independent entity n the foreseeable future, they have engaged themselves in as many front as possible to humble and destabilize the smaller neighbor. Because, as well known, they have already humbled and grabbed many smaller neighbors in the past. One of the destabilizing tactics is the smuggling of arms and handing them over to the fifth columnists for all sorts of terrorizing and anti-social activities. The Bangladesh law enforcing agencies have been continually apprehending many miscreants for smuggling of arms and ammunitions made in the India Explosives Ltd, Gomia, Jharkhand. During the period of one year from August 2007 to July 2008, arms and ammunitions in the process of smuggling have been caught by the Bangladesh law enforcing agencies stood as follows:
1. Rifle 03 6 Bomb/Shell 06
2. Gun 69 7. Detonator 16
4. Pistol 10. 8. Ammunitions 39,585
3. Revolver 09 9. Explosives 09
5. Hand Grenade 01 10. Air Gun 24
The above figures can not be all of everything arms and ammunitions attempted to be smuggled to Bangladesh, but are part of the whole, because, many smugglers and miscreants remained out of the reach of the BDR etc. They have their contact persons stationed here and in other side of the border. Many notorious miscreants and listed top criminals of particular political shade maintain permanent sanctuaries in Kolkata and other places in India. Some maintain carefree luxurious lives there and still now extracting tolls through their contact men criminals inside big cities and towns of Bangladesh and yet have political patronage not only from insiders of India but also some of Bangladesh, as well.
Trafficking of Women and Children from Bangladesh:
Poverty and destitution of millions of common people coupled with recent moral erosion in the society have found some outlet in trafficking of women and young girl children from Bangladesh to other countries. In all such cases, however, the obvious route is India's province of West Bengal and Tripura. One recent report by the Indian NDTV figured out that nearly one third of prostitutes in the cities of Chennai, Bombay and Delhi were of Bangladesh origin. They did not go there through any official channel but through illegal trafficking. Such illegal traffickers are caught now and then but not all for lapses of various natures including of the smartness of the parties concerned and lapses of the law enforcing agencies. In about five and a half years between 2003 and July 2008 such apprehended traffickers were 93; women and children rescued from attempted trafficking from them during the period stood at 183 and 155 respectively. The trend of increase of numbers of women and children being trafficked was on the rise respectively from14 in the year 2003 to 39 in 2008, and from 06 in 2003 to 62 in 2008) and so was the rise of number arrested traffickers from 33 in the year 2003 to 122 in 2008 (Ibid, p. 27). The figures clearly prove that despite arrests of traffickers, the trafficking business is on the increase having some ups and downs at times depending on rigorousness or looseness of the law enforcing agencies conditioned by other factors including payment by traffickers and receipt of cash payments by some law enforcing agencies.
Cross-border smuggling of Narcotics, Sarees etc.:
Cross–border smuggling is nothing unusual between countries having common international border. But the quantum depends on nature of states, economy and culture. So far as Bangladesh and Indian cross border smuggling is concerned, Bangladesh being vulnerable in many matters, adverse effects on the economy of Bangladesh for cross border smuggling is larger than India's bigger size of the economy. During pre-1971 period, however, the effects had been the opposite for the then East Pakistan had a stronger economy than that existed on the other side of the international border. Not only this, the people of this region would take little interest in smuggling for two reasons, one, for being economically better off and two for having had common anti-Indian psyche. Thus smuggling of whatever magnitude that had been then did not harm the economy; things have turned opposite since 1971 and so the harm due to smuggling of massive nature has been severe on the Bangladesh economy.
Smuggled in and out goods vary in their utility and cost. Items like for example Phensidile or a brand of cheaper alcoholic dink is a common item smuggled into Bangladesh from India. This single item of crores of Taka so spent for buying Phensidile, Indian made cheaper alcoholic drink, not only cause moral erosion of our younger generation but also add to burden of the society for their so going astray. On the contrary, items like edible or fuel oil smuggled out of Bangladesh into India affects Bangladesh economy in terms of foreign exchange, because both items are bought by Bangladesh in hard foreign currency.
According to figures given in the above journal, Bangladesh continued to make losses on account of smuggling of hundreds of crores Taka each year rising from 230 crores in the year 2003 never falling in any year below 200 crores until in 2008 at 127 crores ( Ibid, p.27). Narcotics of various forms are another item of many injurious goods smuggled into Bangladesh almost each day out and in. They are like Gaja, Heroin, Cocaine, Opium, Hashish (Ibid, p.20), etc. in addition to the well known Phensidile in huge quantities. They are marketed here at random having no regard to law of the land not only for windfall profit making though clandestine business but also aimed at breaking down the moral fabrics of this highly ethical and moral nation dominated by lofty Islamic values and high moral system. There are as many as 21 Phensidile producers in and around Kolkata having 304 outlet or wholesale shops that supply the cheap alcoholic bottled drink to Bangladesh through many illegal routes and contacts. Thousands of unemployed youths are known to be addicted injuriously with all these cheaper alcoholic drinks and narcotics in Bangladesh.
Another illegal item smuggled in huge number is Indian Saree or women's apparel that has little market in Bangladesh, because, Bangladesh produces all grades of sarees from the finest costly ones to cheaper ones for the poor women. They are so smuggled not for profit making at the moment but for dumping Bangladesh market for future control and gains at the cost of local industries and products. The BDR, at times, apprehends many such smugglers but many other slip out of their hands.
Border Fencing yet no surrender of the Corridor for Dahagram and Angorpota in return for the Berubari enclave.
The Big Brother was so magnanimous in 1971 war, but soon turned unfriendly if not hostile. In 1973 Berubari, an integral part of Bangladesh territory was transferred to Indian control through mutual agreement of the two Prime Ministers of India and Bangladesh providing in the agreement in return of the Three Bigha corridor through Indian territory in the northern flank of Bangladesh territory to enter for all time n in perpetuity into the two Bangladeshi enclaves, Dahagram and Angor pota. The agreement was duly passed immediately in the Bangladesh Parliament. Unfortunately India did not do that and not as yet in 35 years. Why? Is that so that an agreement with an unequal partner is of no significance?
The unfriendly common border control by India has been extended to erecting barbed wire fences all along the international border to further increase fear psychosis among the people living in the rural areas along the international borders and also their hegemonic bigness against Bangladesh.
Talpatti Island of Bangladesh and its forcible occupation by India:
In the west location of Bangladesh's Bay of Bengal, just adjacent to the mangrove forest of the Sunderban, and along the Hariabhanga river meeting the sea in the south, there is what is known as the Talpatti Island of Bangladesh. India claimed the same island as their East More (M R Islam, The Ganges Water Dispute: Its International legal Aspect, UPL, Dhaka-1987, p.172). President Zia ventured in 1981 to free the island from the adverse possession of Indian Navy. Unfortunately he was assassinated in May 1981. Many had a genuine hunch that the Talpatti venture cost President Zia's life in the hands of the Indian secret service R&AW operatives. The recently held maritime boundary meeting with India held after three decades had nothing positive outcome in matters of the Talpatti Island.
The Continuing River Water Sharing Dispute:
The ever boggling issue of border disputes and non-settlement of many other outstanding ones by the Big Brother can not rightly be appreciated, much less clearly evaluated, having had no reference to the overall past historical experience and, for instance, of the natural river water flow obstructions made by India at the upstream of common 53 rivers of Bangladesh. Unless and until India changes her Big Brotherly attitudes to Bangladesh and starts to respect sovereign equality of Bangladesh and fulfils her commitments lawfully made time and again, there is hardly any scope for peaceful co-existence, albeit, at the most disadvantage of smaller Bangladesh.
The latest fury and killings of the three innocent civilians at the Panchgarh area on the 17th November are not the end of everything but clearly part of their designs to keep on creating not only fear psychosis here and thus humble down Bangladesh but also in their frenzy to show disrespect for innocent human lives and for sovereign equality of the smaller neighbor. The ball of respect for innocent human lives and for sovereign equality certainly lies in the court of India.
Dr. M.T. Hussain
18 November 2008



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Armchair Hostage Rescue

Armchair Hostage Rescue

 

 
 
The above is a Google Earth image of the sprawling BDR headquarters at Pilkhana in Dhaka . Pilkhana is a sprawling compound surrounded by densely populated neighborhoods of Dhaka. Take a moment and ponder the size of the BDR compound.
 
After a 33 hour standoff with the government, the so-called BDR mutiny came to an end earlier this week. During the standoff, according to newly lowered estimates from the Bangladesh army, at least 59 army officers were killed by those inside the BDR compound. It is estimated that about 4000 heavily armed BDR soldiers were inside the compound holding, it was assumed, around 160 hostages. It is not known exactly when the army officers were killed, but reports from surviving officers suggest that they were killed within the first hour of the BDR soldiers' rebellion.
 
The government, seeking to avoid massive bloodshed in the middle of Dhaka city, chose to hold talks with the BDR soldiers inside the compound. This led ultimately to the release of the remaining hostages and the end of the standoff after 33 hours.
 
Now, however, it is being argued by many in Bangladesh, within and outside the military, that the government should have allowed the army to launch an assault on the BDR headquarters. It is being argued that such an assault may have saved the lives of the army officers who were killed. Apparently, the government's failure to order an assault caused the deaths of the army officers.
 
I am no expert in hostage rescue, but it seems to me that an assault with 10 or 12 tanks of the army, APCs, anti-aircraft weapons (!), and other assembled weapons of war against a heavily armed force of 4000 holding up to 160 hostages in a sprawling compound (in the middle of a densely populated city) would be neither quick nor easy. It seems to me that such an assault would have been a mass casualty event. I would think an assault on such a large target without knowing where the hostages were or what their condition was would require a great deal of planning - planning that would not be measured in minutes, but in hours and perhaps days. As a reference, one can look at the many long hours it took Indian army commandos to flush out only a handful of lightly armed terrorists from three buildings, an area of operations that is dwarfed by the BDR headquarters (and its many buildings). These things are only quick within the span of a 2 hour movie. In real life, it takes a little longer.
 
So, take a look at the image at the top of this post again. Does it look like an easy takedown?
 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___