Banner Advertiser

Sunday, March 22, 2009

[ALOCHONA] Do GM Crops Increase Yield? The Answer Is No

Do GM Crops Increase Yield? The Answer Is No

 

By Devinder Sharma

 

Lies, damn lies, and the Monsanto website. Tell a lie a hundred times, and the chances are that it will eventually appear to be true. When it comes to genetically modified crops, Monsanto makes such an effort – and it could be that you too are duped into accepting their distortions as truth.

My attention has been drawn to an article titled "Do GM crops increase yield?" on Monsanto's web page, although I must confess that this is the first time I have visited their site.

 

This is how it begins: "Recently, there have been a number of claims from anti-biotechnology activists that genetically-modified (GM) crops don't increase yields. Some have claimed that GM crops actually have lower yields than non-GM crops. Both claims are simply false."

 

It then goes on to explain the terms germplasm, breeding, biotechnology, and then finally explains yield. Here is what it says: "The introduction of GM traits through biotechnology has led to increased yields independent of breeding. Take for example statistics cited by PG Economics, which annually tallies the benefits of GM crops, taking data from numerous studies around the world:

Mexico - yield increases with herbicide tolerant soybean of 9 percent.

Romania – yield increases with herbicide tolerant soybeans have averaged 31 percent.

 

Philippines – average yield increase of 15 percent with herbicide tolerant corn.

Philippines – average yield increase of 24 percent with insect resistant corn.

Hawaii – virus resistant papaya has increased yields by an average of 40 percent.

 

India – insect resistant cotton has led to yield increases on average more than 50 percent." These assertions are not amusing, and can no longer be taken lightly. I am not only shocked but also disgusted at the way corporations try to fabricate and distort the scientific facts, and dress them up in such a manner that the so-called 'educated' of today will accept them without asking any questions.

 

Distorted science

At the outset, Monsanto's claims are simply fraudulent. I have seen similar conclusions, at least about Bt cotton yields in India, in a study by The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) – although I have always said that IFPRI is an organisation that needs to be shut down. It has done more damage to developing country agriculture and food security than any other academic institution.

 

Nevertheless, let us look at Monsanto's claims. The increases in crop yields that Monsanto has shown in Mexico, Romania, the Philippines, Hawaii and India are actually not yield increases at all. In scientific terms these are called crop losses, which have been very cleverly masqueraded as yield increases. By indulging in a jugglery of scientific terminologies that take advantage of the layman's ignorance, Monsanto has made claims based on evidence that does not exist.

 

As written in Monsanto's article: "The most common traits in GM crops are herbicide tolerance (HT) and insect resistance (IR). HT plants contain genetic material from common soil bacteria. IR crops contain genetic material from a bacterium that attacks certain insects."

 

This is true. Herbicide tolerant plants and insect resistant plants do perform broadly the same function as chemical pesticides. Both the GM plants and the chemical pesticides reduce crop losses. In fact, GM plants work more or less like a bio-pesticide - the insect feeds on the plant carrying the toxin, and dies. Spraying the chemical pesticide also does the same.

 

In the case of herbicide tolerant plants, the outcome is much worse. Biotech companies have successfully dove-tailed the trait for herbicide tolerance in the plant. As a result, those who buy the GM seeds have no other option but to also buy the companies own brand of herbicide. Killing two birds with one stone, you might say.

 

GM companies have only used the transgenic technology to remove competition from the herbicide market. Instead of allowing the farmer to choose from different brands of herbicides available in the market, they have now ensured that you are only left with a Hobson's choice. As several studies have conclusively shown in the US, the use of herbicide does not go down over time, but rather increases.

 

Here is the question that must now be asked: if the chemical herbicide used by Monsanto's herbicide tolerant soybeans (so-called 'Roundup Ready') truly increases yields, then why don't all the other herbicides available in the market also increase yields?

 

Surely, if all herbicides do the same job of killing herbs, then all herbicides should increase crop yields. Am I not correct? So why are we led to believe that only Roundup Ready soybeans (a GM crop) increase yields, whereas others do not?

 

When was the last time you were told that herbicides increase crop yields? Chemical herbicides are only known to merely reduce crop losses. This is what I was taught when studying plant breeding – a fact that is still being taught to agricultural science students everywhere in the world..

Cotton lies

 

A similar story holds true for cotton. We all know that cotton consumes about 50 percent of total pesticides sprayed, and these chemical pesticides are known to reduce crop losses. I am sure that Monsanto would also agree without question that pesticides do not increase crop yields, and I repeat DO NOT increase cotton yields.

 

Monsanto's Bt cotton, which uses a gene from a soil bacteria to produce a toxin within the plant that kills certain pests, also does the same. It only kills the insect, which means it does the same job that a chemical pesticide is supposed to perform. The crop losses that a farmer minimises after applying chemical pesticide is never (and has never) been measured in terms of yield increases. It has always been computed as savings from crop losses.

 

If GM crops increase yields, shouldn't we therefore say that chemical pesticides (including herbicides) also increase yields? Will the agricultural scientific community accept that pesticides increases crop yields?

 

This brings me to another relevant question: Why don't agricultural scientists say that chemical pesticides increase crop yields? While you ponder over this question (and there are no prizes for getting it right), let me tell you that the last time the world witnessed increases in crop yields was when the high-yielding crop varieties were evolved. That was the time when scientists were able to break through the genetic yield barrier. The double-gene and triple-gene dwarf wheat (a trait that was subsequently inducted in rice) brought in quantum jumps in yield potential. That was way back in the late 1960s. Since then, there has been no further genetic breakthrough in crop yields. Let there be no mistake about it.

 

Monsanto is therefore making faulty claims. None of its GM crop varieties increases yields. At best, they only reduce crop losses. If Monsanto does not know the difference between crop losses and crop yields, it needs to take some elementary lessons again in plant breeding. But please, Monsanto, don't try and fool the world by distorting scientific facts.

 

For the record, let me also state that when Bt cotton was being introduced in India in 2001 (its entry was delayed by another year when I challenged the scientific claims made by Mahyco-Monsanto), the Indian Council for Agricultural Research had also objected to the company's claim of increasing yield. It is however another matter that ICAR's objections were simply brushed aside by the Department of Biotechnology, and we all know why.

 

Interestingly, ISAAA and several consultancy firms (and how can we believe them anyway after their role in the economic collapse now facing the world) have been claiming that cotton yields in India increased after Bt cotton was introduced. Such claims are made about other crops too. I have seen this happening again and again over the past two decades; whenever the crop yields increase, the scientists and agribusinesses take the credit. But when the crop yields go down, the blame invariably shifts to weather conditions.

 

Which may make you wonder why agricultural scientists and companies never thank the weather at times of bumper harvest. As a former Indian Agriculture Minister, Mr Chaturanand Mishra, always used to say, the only real Agriculture Minister is the monsoon.

 

This year, cotton production estimates in India have been scaled down by 14 per cent. Using the same yardstick, does it not mean that the productivity of Bt cotton is also falling? But of course the blame cannot lie with Bt cotton. You guessed right – it must be the fault of inclement weather.

 

Devinder Sharma is a New Delhi-based food and trade policy analyst. He is a regular contributor to STWR and can be reached at hunger55@gmail.com

 

http://www.stwr.org/food-security-agriculture/do-gm-crops-increase-yield-the-answer-is-no.html




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [ALOCHONA] 1971: Story of friendship in need and in deed

Mr. Ibrahim:
 
Thank you for your interesting article and references, as well as for your service to our nation. I must draw your attention to one historical inaccuracy though. The WWII did not begin with the invasion of Belgium and France. Rather, it officially started with the invasion of Poland in September 1939. Many historians claim, and I agree with them, that the actual act of war began when Germany annexed Austria and established claim on territories of Czechoslovakia.
 
Thanks,
Cyrus


From: Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo.com>
To: zoglul@hotmail.co.uk; shahin72@gmail.com; alfazanambd@yahoo.com; rehman.mohammad@gmail.com; ahmadashiqulhamid@yahoo.com; farhadmazhar@hotmail.com; mahmudurart@yahoo.com; kmamalik@aol.com; dhakamails@yahoogroups.com; alochona@yahoogroups.com; bdresearchers@yahoogroups.com; bangla-vision@yahoogroups.com; mouchakaydheel@yahoo.com; delwar98@hotmail.com; serajurrahman@btinternet.com; odhora@yahoogroups.com; ayeshakabir@yahoo.com; sayantha15@yahoo..com; minarrashid@yahoo.com; history_islam@yahoogroups.com; udarakash08@yahoo.com; dahuk@yahoogroups.com; shahahmadreza@yahoo.com; hossain.khilji@yahoo.com
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 12:10:18 AM
Subject: [ALOCHONA] 1971: Story of friendship in need and in deed

1971: Story of friendship in need and in deed

 

by Maj Gen (Retd) Syed Muhammad Ibrahim, Bir Protik

The Second World War began in September 1939, with the offensive against Belgium and France by Germany. Although part of Europe, England or the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was separated by the waters of the English Channel. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill anticipated that Germany will have to launch offensive against Britain also; but in variably it had to begin with air offensive. The German Air Force had more planes than the British Air Force.. So, Churchill ordered an elaborate plan for the defense of British Isles should the German offensive begin. The offensive came as a deed, the peak period being between 24 August and 06 September 1940.

The combat between the Air force of the two countries with support from the ground became to be known as 'Battle of Britain'. The sincerity, patriotism, sacrifice of the soldiers of the British Air Force is indeed nearly unparalleled in the history of air-warfare. On 20 August 1940 the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill while speaking about the Battle of Britain, in the House of Commons, London, paid tribute to the pilots and airmen in the following world : "never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few".

I am neither a minister in any cabinet nor a Field Marshal or four star General in any Army, I am a humble freedom fighter who rose to two-star Generalship in the humble but proud army of a nascent but potentially rich country. I was born on 4 October 1949 and commissioned in the Pakistan Army on 6 September 1970. Therefore on the day of declaration of independence of Bangladesh on the 26th March 1971, I was 21 years 5 months and 22 days old and had only 6 months and 20 days of service. But, now when I am writing this column having the benefit of hindsight and benefit of retrospective evaluation, I can safely commemorate the contribution of India in the Liberation of Bangladesh, not independence, by saying: 'possibly no other nation or country in the history of the world has done so much in so many ways in so compact a time as India has done for Bangladesh between 26 March 1971 to 16 December 1971 that is why, the long title of this column should have been 1971: story of friendship between India and Bangladesh at the time of most crucial need of Bangladesh and delivered in reality'.

The people of East Pakistan as we were before becoming people of Bangladesh, have had difficult times before March 1971, as well as have had bad times after December 1971. Irrespective of the trials and tribulations, the most difficult time was the 9 months of the war of liberation. Liberation was achieved, we have survived 38 long years, and we must continue to survive. Our times of need have not ended; they do appear infrequently though. Friends and friendship is always a necessity, but realistic friend and friendship in-deed (or actions) is rare. Indian diplomat and a former Foreign Secretary J.N Dixit was not only a witness but a participant in the processes leading to the Liberation of Bangladesh. He was director of the special division created in the External Affairs Ministry to deal with the political dimensions of the East Pakistan crisis in 1971. Later he became the first Indian Head of Mission in Dhaka. He wrote a book titled 'Liberation and Beyond: Indo-Bangladesh Relations'. This particular title is a meaningful indicator for the thoughtful ones.

I pay my respects and tribute to the martyrs of the Bangladesh War of Liberation who were sons of the soil. I also pay my respect and tribute to those foreigners, neither Bangladeshi nor Indian, like the British, American, German, Australian, Japanese, French and the like, who also shed their sweat and tilled their brain for our liberation, who may have been decorated or not. I salute the 7 Bir Srestho (or Shaheed), the 68 Bir Uttom, 175 Bir Bikrom and 426 Bir Protik who were decorated. I pray the departed soul of the Martyrs or Shaheeds: 2022 from Bangladesh Army, 5 from Navy 51 from Air Force 817 from BDR, and 1639 from Bangladesh Police and the remaining unknown number which go to make the 30 lac or 3 million Shaheed.  I salute the unknown, unnamed and undecorated heroes also without whom the ballad of our liberation war will remain incomplete. (note: should there be any error in the figures, I apologize and will be happy to be corrected).

Although I am picking the name only as token, I pay my respect and tribute to the soldier of Indian Armed Forces who gave their life as well as those who shed sweat and blood on the soil of Bangladesh during December 1971 for our liberation. The name is Lance Naik Albert Ekka of 14 Guards who was awarded Param Vir Chakra. 14 Guards is an infantry battalion which took part in the Battle of Gangasagar in December 1971. Param Vir Chakra is the highest gallantry award in the Indian Army as is the Victoria Cross for Britain, or the Nishan-i-Haidar for Pakistan, or Bri Srestho for Bangladesh.

The cataclysmic events of 1971 on the soil of Bangladesh have been described variously by various actors on the stage or observers form various angles of observations. Plenty has been written by eye-witness. Since I could not spare time to run around various libraries or delve into one or the other website, so I relied on my personal library only to refer to some books which will reflect the variety in perception, evaluation or description. Although there is a large number of books of Bangladeshi military and non-military authors with me, yet for the sake of space only I cannot mention them or quote from them. My salute to all the authors. To those Bangladeshis of present generation, my appeal is they must know 1971 and the sacrifices.. To those who are elder to them, my appeal is, please reinforce what you know and dispel any unwanted insinuation.

I am making reference to some books and quoting odd sentence from one or two. These quotations are food for thought for the serious thinkers without me adding any remarks catalytically. (A) Hasan Zaheer was a member of the civil service of Pakistan who served in the-then East Pakistan in various capacities. He was serving in Dhaka at the time of the surrender of Pakistan on 16 December 1971 also. He later became a secretary to the Government of Pakistan. He wrote a book published in 1998 by University Press Limited, Dhaka titled 'The Separation of East Pakistan: The Rise and Realization of Bengali Muslim Nationalism'. (B) Richard Sisson and Leo E. Rose wrote a book titled 'War and Secession: Pakistan, India, and the Creation of Bangladesh' published from Oxford University Press, Pakistan in 1992. In reviewing this book, Thomas P Thornton of the School of International Studies, Johns Hopkins University said: 'This study makes a major contribution to our understanding of a series of events that are not only important in their South Asian context but also have major implications for the study of superpower relations and for international conflict more generally'. (C) Archer K Blood was the American Consul General in the former East Pakistan in 1971.

Following his term in Dhaka, Archer K Blood served the State Department and US Army War College ending with being the Charge d' Affairs in US Mission in New Delhi. He wrote a book titled 'The Cruel Birth of Bangladesh' published by University Press Limited, Dhaka in 2002. In the words of the publisher: "The book reflects deep commitment to freedom on the part of the author and reads like and epitaph for the martyrs of struggle of the Bengali people…. Blood had to wait until December 1998 for the State Department to declassify the documents, telegrams and other messages related to this period before he could use them."

(D) Siddiq Salik was a lecturer and journalist before joining Pakistan Army as Public Relations Officer. In 1971 he was a Major in the Army; he served in Dhaka between January 1970 and 20th December 1971 which gave him the unique privilege to observe the high level political drama in Dhaka. With two years of life as a prisoner of war in India, he had opportunity to reflect and analyze. He wrote a book titled 'Witness to Surrender' published by Oxford University Press, Karachi, Pakistan in 1977 which provides a narrative where events are more important than personalities. (E) Commissioned in 1954, Hakeem Arshad Qureshi was a Lieutenant Colonel commanding 26 FF (an infantry battalion) in Saidpur-Rangpur- Dinajpur during 1971 earning the gallantry award a Sitara-i-Jurat.. He retired from the Army in 1990 as a Major General.

He wrote a book titled 'The 1971 Indo-Pak War: A Soldier's Narrative' published by Oxford University Press, Karachi, Pakistan in 2002. To me, as a military officer as much as to many others like Lieutenant General Muhammad Iqbal of the Pakistan Army and a former Governor of the province of Punjab, the most important chapter in the book is the last chapter, chapter 25 'concluding observations' where there is much self criticism. (F) Major General Tajammal Hussain Malik wrote a book titled 'The Story of My Struggle' published by Jang publishers, Lahore, Pakistan in 1991. In 1971 he was commanding 205 Brigade in Hilli-Bogra. In December 1971 he was taken a prisoner of war. Only a portion of the book deals with 1971. (G) Lieutenant General A.A.K. Niazi was commander, Eastern command of the Pakistan Army from end April to 16 December 1971. He wrote a book titled 'The Betrayal of East Pakistan' published by Oxford University Press, Karachi, Pakistan in 1998. The book is a very vivid account of the events in 1971 coming from the horse's mouth.

In page xxv of the book in the preface he writes "The final plan for the dismemberment of Pakistan was hatched between General Yahya and Bhutto at Larkana, Bhutto's home town. The plan, which came to be known as the M. M. Ahmed plan, aimed at abandoning East Pakistan without a successor government, which meant: by losing the war….." In page 46 he writes "General Tikka, instead of carrying out the tasks given to him, i.e., to disarm armed Bengali units and persons and to take into custody the Bengali leaders, resorted to the killing of civilians and a scorched-earth policy. His orders to his troops were: I want the land and not the people….." A very pertinent question is:  what does the author refer to, by the words betrayal of East Pakistan? Does he mean to say East Pakistan betrayed Pakistan or does he mean to say the Government of Pakistan and the high command of the Pakistan Army betrayed the Eastern part of Pakistan by not living up to their commitments before and during 1971? My personal feeling is General Niazi and his book has concentrated on the second possibility. (H) I mentioned earlier that for shortage of space I am not mentioning Bangladeshi authors although plenty of their books are with me and the feelings of the authors in my heart. Nonetheless, I have to mention the name of one book titled 'Secret Affidavit of Yahya Khan on 1971', edited by Abu Rushd and published by Bangladesh Defence Journal Publishing (email infobdj@yahoo. com), in February 2009. General Yahya Khan former President of Pakistan was the petitioner in writ petition number 1649 of 1978 in the Lahore High Court of Pakistan.

 The General made an affidavit therein. In the said affidavit in paragraph 9 (pages 39-40 of the book) the following is stated "That this threat of Mr. Bhutto that whosoever will go to Dacca his legs will be broken could put at stake the national solidarity. This aggravated the situation in East Pakistan and was a violation of the legal framework order. This threat from Mr. Bhutto's side provided a cause of revolt in East Pakistan. This was no less dangerous than the six points and clearly meant separation of the two wings of the country. The deponent times and again used to warn him and it was a matter of habit with him that he listened patiently but never bothered to act upon any advice. The speech delivered by Mr. Bhutto in Iqbal Park was tremendously perilous to the integrity of Pakistan. Rather, it was more suicidal to the integrity of Pakistan than the six points formula ……. but Mr. Z. A. Bhutto was a clever and venomous toad. Mr. Bhutto was slave to his lust for power so much so that he proposed the concept of two prime ministers in one country which the deponent strongly condemned. In answer to Mr. Bhutto's threatening speech of IDDHER HAM UDDAR TUM at Karachi, Sheikh Mujib on 12.3.1971 also delivered a public speech wherein he reiterated the unity and solidarity of Pakistan.

It is the opinion of the deponent that Mujib was patriotic at that time unlike Mr. Bhutto. Had Mr. Bhutto not been elected to the Assembly he would not have been able to make such unpatriotic speeches and statements which ultimately contributed to the breakage of Pakistan." (I) Lieutenant General Gul Hassan Khan wrote a book titled 'MEMOIRS OF LT. GEN. GUL HASSAN KHAN (The Last Commander-in- Chief of the Pakistan Army)', published by Oxford University Press, Karachi, Pakistan in 1993. He had served as the director of military operations for more than four years when General Musa was the C-in-C of Pakistan Army. Later he became the Chief of General Staff at the General Headquarters of Pakistan Army and was occupying the same chair while the Eastern command surrender. General Gul Hassan devotes a minor but fruitful portion of the book to their war in East Pakistan in 1971.

(J) Ranabir Samaddar authored Azad Institute Paper 6 titled 'On Problems of Writing A Comprehensive History of the Bangladesh Liberation War', published by Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies, Calcutta, India, 1997. I quote from page 19 of the book "Among the different arguments for retrying writing the history of 1971, this need to present the civil role in its proper shape certainly deserves attention. Much of the sense of discomfort over the received history of 1971 is due to the precarious way the political and the military are perched in that history and the uncertain balance between them. And it is true, countering a militarist reading is a step towards de-centering 1971 towards recovery of its political history.

 Yet such a recovery of the political history is also beset with problems born from its own dialectic. The political history of 1971 tells us how the political progress of the nationalist leadership did not go beyond the demands of autonomy in 1970-71 and it was the military measures of the Pakistani junta followed by Indian military intervention and the guerrilla activities of bands of patriots that suddenly resolved the issue. This history also tells how the nationalist state which was born in 1971-72 started quickly assuming militarist forms by eliminating radical groups which themselves were thriving on a kind of militarism, by proposing one-party rule, by rehabilitating military officers of erstwhile united Pakistan irrespective of their record, finally by allowing a military take-over on the logic of nationalism and the very logic on which 1971 had stood." (K) PN Kathpalia was the commander of 71 Mountain Brigade which operated in North-Western part of Bangladesh in December 1971. He retired as a Lieutenant General in October 1985. He wrote a book titled 'Mission with a Difference: The Exploits of 71 Mountain Brigade', published by Lancer International, New Delhi in 1986. In chapter one pages 11 to 22 he describes the Genesis of the Conflict. In page 21 he talks of when and how Pakistan Government imposed a military solution which encouraged Bengali defections from the Pakistan Army and the Government.

At one point he writes "The Awami League could pursue the only course available to it – partisan and guerilla warfare, with the hope that the people of Bangladesh would keep moving towards the professed aim of freedom and all actions in support of this aim would keep world attention riveted on the region with the ultimate hope of getting some support for the cause internationally." (L) Major General Sukhwant Singh was commissioned as an artillery officer in the British-Indian Army in 1944. He was deputy director of military operations at Army Headquarter, New Delhi, during the war of liberation of Bangladesh in 1971. He authored a three volume monumental study called 'India's Wars Since independence'. Volume one of this study is 'The Liberation of Bangladesh' published after his death by Vikas Publishing House PVT Ltd in 1981. In page 32 of the book in chapter 'The Mukti Bahini Takes Shape', he says "The biggest worry of the Indian Government in regard to the revolt was the threat it posed to India's own security. Extremist elements had already been active in West Bengal and had created a law and order problem in the previous two years.

The Army had been called in to assist the civil authorities in quelling them. In the other eastern states too subversive elements had been active for some years. If the leadership of the movement in East Pakistan fell into the hand of extremists, a very dangerous situation could have arisen for India. Hence the need to support the moderate element among the Bangladeshis, represented by the vast majority that had voted for Mujib in the December 1970 polls. The Indian aim was to get the refugees to go back, and this could be achieved only with the installation of an elected government in Dacca." (M) Lieutenant General JFR Jacob wrote a book titled 'Surrender at Dacca: Birth of a Nation' published by University Press Limited, Dhaka in 1997. He was Chief of Staff of Indian Army's Eastern Command Headquarter between May 1969 and June 1972. During Bangladesh War of Liberation he was still the Chief of Staff while Lieutenant General J. S. Aurora was the Commander, (a note for non-military readers: this designation means Jacob was the senior most staff officer). In page 38 of the book he writes "On 29 April Eastern Command was officially given the responsibility of assisting Bangladesh forces in their liberation struggle, and the BSF located on the border were placed under the command of the Eastern Army." In page 42 of the book he writes "The decision made at the end of March 1971 to help the Mukti Bahini was confirmed publicly later by the Minister of External Affairs. On 29 July, in a statement to the Parliament, he said 'This Parliament had unanimously adopted a resolution pledging sympathy and support, and we are pursuing that resolution in the best possible manner and we are doing everything possible to lend support to the freedom fighters'."

On the eve of our independence day we are not feeling comfortable at heart. The events of 25-26 February 2009 in Pilkhana have rendered the hearts sad and fragile. The column ends here with the age old saying: Eternal vigilance is the price of Liberty. We were not vigilant in February 2009!

A decorated freedom fighter of Bangladesh War of Liberation 1971, the writer is a renowned columnist and a commentator on the electronic media. He is a graduate of the Royal Staff Collage UK, the US Army War College and holds Master Degree in Defense Studies. He has authored and edited a number of books and is currently a PhD researcher in the University of Dhaka. mgsmibrahim@ yahoo.com

 

http://www.probenew smagazine. com/index. php?index= 2&contentId=4959





__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Re: Moin U Ahmed & PM responsible for the BDR HQ killings!!!

There are many self-proclaimed human rights activists are in production in recent days. It seems who ever do not want to disclose their political identity or affliction finds the human right shield as extremely valuable when flushing venom against our nations unity.

 

As their self-imposed titles are fascinating their hypothetical, imaginary conjectural analysis of BDR issue are mesmerizing but precarious. I will call then scientist rather then activist because their bi (or bio) product are one of a piece, which separates them from regular.

 

In an ordinary time I will read their theories or discard it as rubbish but when the nation passing through a somber but crucial juncture their write-up seems very cruel and designs to fuel for instigating a national crisis.

 

This reminds us of role played by Jamaat-e-Islami and other anti liberation forces during our liberation war. When we Bengalis were fighting for our existence, they called us Indian agents. Jamaat leaders filled print and electronic media with rhetoric and vengeance against our unity during the nine months war of liberation.

 

We were fighting against them then, we are fighting against them today, and our sons and daughter will continue the fight against them into future. We won then, we will win today and surely, our sons and daughters will be victorious as well.

 

Regards

Shamim Chowdhury

Maryland, USA


--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Shahid Sadik <shahid123sadik@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear friends,
>
>  
>
> Please hear
> the audio between PM and Army officers at Army HQ again. It is very clear that
> Maj. General Shakil had talked both Moin U Ahmed & Sheikh Hasina. They
> both assured that the army is coming soon. Almost 1 hour the officers inside BDR
> Dorbar Hall were alive. But army didn’t come.
>
>  
>
> The second thing is that why the BDR gate no. 5 was open to escape the killers.
>
>  
>
> Those two things clearly proved that PM & Moin U Ahmed is responsible for the heinous killings at least
> indirectly!!!
>
>  
>
> Thank you,  
>
>  
>
> Shahid Sadik
>
> Human Rights Activist
>


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] 'Interesting' News from MBI Munshi on "UN asked to return Bangladeshi forces"

WRT: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/message/51369

'Interesting' News from MBI Munshi on "UN asked to return Bangladeshi forces"


Its interesting to see such news published in a much 'less known' weekly "the Blitz' and circulated by a 'well known' personality like Mr Munshi in many forums and web sites including Mukto Mona.

I could not get a confirmation from the UNSG's office about the authenticity of this letter by one 'Susan Ramgopalam'. I guess the weekly had the exclusive right to get a copy of the letter written by him/her.

Nevertheless, I say it is 'interesting' because soon after the 1/11 - when political activities were limited, I saw some small size leaflets posted in the toilets and less frequent corners of the Dhaka University, Business Studies department, circulated by some islamist party outlining some demands. One such demand was "to pull out our troops employed in the UN". The reasons explained in that leaflet for such demand was to curb the leverage of UN that they allegedly enjoyed over Bangladesh Military due to the large number of Bangladeshi troops operating under blue helmet.

Though the context is different, yet the demand seems to be the same. Thus, it is indeed "interesting" to see how the same demand can be pursued from two different groups having diametrically opposite viewpoints and reasoning. Or are they same?

Regards
Zahid Khan
Dhaka


------------------------------------

****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration:
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
-Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:mukto-mona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:mukto-mona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mukto-mona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[mukto-mona] Women and the Tablighi Jama‘at

Women and the Tablighi Jama'at

By Yoginder Sikand

 

 

Introduction
From its origins in early twentieth-century north India, the Tablighi Jama'at (TJ) has now grown into what is probably the single largest Islamic movement of contemporary times. Writing in 1992, one scholar observed that the movement had a presence in around 165 countries (Faruqi 1992, 43). It would not be wrong, then, to say that the TJ is today active in almost every country in the world where Muslims live. Despite the obviously great influence that the TJ has on the lives of millions of Muslims throughout the world, scholars have hitherto devoted little attention to it.1 Even within the existing limited corpus of writings on the TJ, almost no mention has been made of the participation of women in the movement. This paper is an attempt to address this serious lacuna in our understanding of the role of women in the TJ. It does not claim to be a complete account, though, for given the nature of the movement, the subject of women in the TJ can only be properly studied by a female researcher, preferably a Muslim, with access to female Tablighi respondents who rarely appear before 'strange' (ghayr) men.

In exploring the question of the role of women in the TJ, this paper begins by tracing the historical context within which the movement emerged. It then moves to a discussion of the portrayal of the ideal Islamic woman in Tablighi tracts. The Tablighi agenda for women follows from this. In the concluding section of the paper we turn our attention to what implications Tablighi work might actually have for Muslim women, both activists in the movement as well as others.

The Historical Context


The decline of Muslim political power in South Asia towards the end of the eighteenth century witnessed the emergence of several reformist 'ulama, crusading against the widespread observance of local customs, often seen as 'Hinduistic', and calling for Muslims to abide strictly by the shari'a instead. For these reformists, the decline of the fortunes of the Mughals was a result of Muslims' straying from the path of the shari'a. Hence, they stressed, Muslim power could only be salvaged if Muslims were to begin to govern their own lives according to the dictates of Islamic law (Ikram 1963, 14). In pursuit of this aim, they began increasingly devoting their attention to ordinary Muslims who were seen as the bastion of 'un-Islamic' customs and practices. This represented a noticeable shift from past precedent, for at the height of Muslim power in the subcontinent the 'ulama seem to have been primarily concerned with the ruling elite, remaining distinctly aloof from common Muslims.

The growing power of the British, culminating in the overthrow of the Mughal dynasty after the aborted revolt of 1857, saw the Indian 'ulama making new efforts to cultivate links with the Muslim masses who, with the Mughals now gone, increasingly began to be viewed as the new repositories of Islam. With the eclipse of Muslim political authority, from now on it was to be ordinary Muslims who came increasingly to be seen as the 'protectors of Islam'. Purged of local customs, beliefs and practices, the reformed Muslim man, and later, woman as well, was to be the new defender of the faith. This concern was best exemplified by the movement spawned by the Dar ul-'Ulum, a seminary established at the town of Deoband, near Delhi, in 1867.

By training 'ulama, by issuing opinions in matters of religious law (fatawa) and, most of all, by taking advantage of new printing technology by publishing popular books and tracts in the vernaculars, the Deobandi 'ulama sought to disseminate the message and teachings of reformist Islam among ordinary Muslims. Of particular concern to them was the religious instruction of ordinary believers in the fundamentals of the faith, including basic rituals practices and beliefs ('aqa'id). Marketing a distinct departure from the past, they began paying increasing attention to Muslim women, who they saw as bastions of 'Hinduistic' customs and traditions. The reformed Muslim woman was now seen as playing a central role in the project of reforming the Muslim family and, in the process, the Muslim community as a whole. This concern for women on the part of the Deobandi reformists was most strikingly illustrated with the writing of a voluminous text specially for women, the Bahishti Zewar, by the leading Deobandi 'alim, Maulana Ashraf 'Ali Thanawi (d. 1943) in the early years of the twentieth century.2 This book, more than any other, grew into the most popular reformist tract for the proper religious instructions of Muslim women in India, a distinction that it enjoys till this very day.

As a product of the Deoband madrasa and a student of Maulana Thanawi, Maulana Muhammad Ilyas (d. 1994), the founder of the TJ, was particularly concerned to popularize the teachings of the new Islamic reformists among ordinary Muslims, including both men and women. The first target of Ilyas' early tablighi (missionary) efforts, starting in the mid-1920s, were the tribe of nominal Muslim converts known as the Meos who lived in the region of Mewat, to the immediate south of Delhi. In the course of his work in Mewat, he strove to encourage the Meos to cultivate faith (iman), to improve their knowledge of the basic beliefs of their region, and to abide strictly by the rituals of Islam. From its humble origins in Mewat, the TJ gradually grew into the vast international movement that it is today.

In the early years of the TJ, the movement was directed almost entirely at men. Once his movement had established a significant presence in Mewat, Ilyas seems to have realized that his mission would remain incomplete if he did not bring women into active involvement in it. Accordingly, he approached some leading Deobandi 'ulama with a proposal to start Tablighi work among women. The 'ulama, however, initially recoiled at the prospect, arguing that this was 'an age of great disorder' (fitna ka zamana), with women going out of their homes without covering themselves 'properly', and that Tabligh tours might actually be used by women as an 'excuse' for 'turning towards freedom'.

Despite the 'ulama's initial hostility to his proposal, Ilyas kept up his pleas for women to be allowed to participate in Tabligh work, until the noted Deobandi 'alim, Mufti Kifayatullah, finally relented and gave him his consent. Thereafter, Ilyas approached a close disciple of his, one Maulana 'Abdus Subhan, who was persuaded to let his wife begin missionary work among Muslim women in Delhi, where Ilyas lived and where the TJ currently has its global headquarters. This woman is said to have, under Ilyas' instructions, formed a small group of women who went off for a few days to Mewat in the company of their husbands and, under the supervision of one Maulana Daud, started preaching among the Meo women of that region. After that, we are told, women's participation in the work of the TJ gradually picked up in many other parts of the world as the movement began to expand outside the confines of South Asia (Ferozepuri n.d., 105-7).

This is one of the only references we have in the available literature to the actual work of women in the TJ, and even here they remain faceless, nameless people about whom we are told but little. We do know, however, what they and other TJ women activists were, and still are, taught and learnt as participants in the movement, and to that we may now turn.

Principles, Beliefs and the Ideal Muslim Woman


As in the case of Muslim men, the TJ sees every Muslim woman as playing a central and active part in the effort for the revival of Islam. The method in which this is to be done – the tariqa-i tabligh – is, for the most part, common to both men and women. Ordinary Muslim women are encouraged to take time off and form a women's group or masturati jama'at that travels to various places to do Tabligh work, preaching the message of reformist Islam among the Muslim womenfolk in the areas they visit. To begin with, ideally, they should spend three days at a stretch every two months in this way. After they have gained enough experience they should start to go on fifteen–day jama'ats. Thereafter, this should be increased to a chillah, or forty days at a stretch, or even longer, during the course of which they should be encouraged to visit other countries to carry on Tabligh work there.3

Only married women may go out on a jama'at, and they always be accompanied by a male relative. This should preferably be the husband. If, for some reason, the husband is unable to accompany a woman, she must have her son, brother, father grandfather or some such mehram relative with her.4 The male mehram should, if possible, be one who has already spent a chillah doing Tabligh work. In addition, he must have a beard, testifying to his commitment to Islam (Wali ul- Islam 1996, 17).

Ideally, the jama'at should consist of ten women and ten male mehram relatives (Ibid., 16). While on a Tabligh tour, all decisions regarding the working of the jama'at are to be taken by the men folk accompanying the women. The head (amir) of the jama'at must in all cases be a man. In consultation (mashwara) with the other men he is to oversee the working of the group. Decisions taken by him are relayed to the women through the medium of a woman whom the women choose among themselves. This woman is told of the amir's decisions by her own husband or mehram relative who is accompanying her, and she, in turn, conveys this information to the other women in her group (Ferozepuri n.d., 108).

When the group reaches its destination the women are taken to the house of a local Tablighi activist, where arrangements have been made to keep them in strict pardah (seclusion). Such a house must have toilet facilities for women inside; women are not to step out of the house to relieve themselves in the fields, as is the practice in much of rural South Asia. If the house does not have a toilet, one must be built, says a Tablighi elder, before the women arrive (Ibid., 107, 109). The men folk accompanying them are put up in separate quarters nearby or may stay in the local mosque. For a few days the women live together like a small community.

The daily schedule for the women is formulated by their husbands or mehram men folk in consultation with each other. After they have chalked out the women's programme for the day, it is written down on a sheet of paper and slipped under the pardah to the women's quarter (Wali ul-Islam 1996, 15). Much of the day is to be devoted to improving the women's own knowledge and practice of basic Islamic ritual observances. In the course of their stay the women activists are expected to learn, among other things, the principles of Tablighi work, which they are to popularize among the women of their own families once they return to their homes. Of central importance is the learning of what is called in Tablighi parlance the chhe baten or the 'six points'. The first of these is the kalima shahada or the Islamic creed. The second is namaz, Islamic prayer. 'Ilm, or knowledge about the basic Islamic ritual practices, and zikr, litanies in remembrance of God, come next. Here women are expected to memorize a number of Arabic supplications that are to be used for various different occasions. This is followed by ikhlas-i niyyat or 'the purification of intension'. Here, the women are expected to learn that every thought and action of their must be motivated solely by the desire to gain the pleasure of God and to acquire sawab or religious merit. Sixthly, and last, is ikram-i muslimin, the importance of respect for other Muslims, particularly the 'ulama.

Besides the chhe baten, while on jama'at the women must busy themselves in reading in a group from the books of faza'il or heavenly rewards for pious deeds. This genre of Tablighi literature consists largely of books containing short episodes from the lives of the early Muslims recounting their piety, and highlighting, in particular, the great rewards that are to be expected in the Hereafter if one follows in their footsteps.

The daily recitation from the books of faza'il is to be accompanied by bayans, or lectures, that are delivered to the women by a learned and experienced male Tablighi activist, who may either be one of the husbands or mehram relatives of the women or a local Muslim. The bayan is to be delivered from behind a curtain so that although the women may hear the speaker, they may not see him and nor can he see them. The lecture should focus on the need for all Muslims to engage in Tabligh work, to strengthen their faith, improve their practice of the Islamic ritual observances, and to bring Islam into their own personal lives.

Women activists who are experienced in Tabligh work and well versed in its principles may also address the other womenfolk. However, here extreme care should be taken that a woman does not speak in an authoritative tone as if she is delivering a lecture. The reasons for this, says a Tablighi elder, that this is the age of fitna (disorder), of great corruption and degeneration, and 'much evil', he warns, can come out of this (Ferozepuri n.d., 109). Just as women should 'always keep their bodies completely concealed', he says, so too 'must their voices be kept in complete pardah' (Ibid., 111). Unlike a man, who can give a lecture from the pulpit (mimbar) or while sitting on a chair, if a woman is to address her sisters she must, like them, sit on the floor and speak to them. In no case should she stand up to speak to the others, as that goes against what are seen as notions of feminine modesty (Wali ul-Islam 1996, 16). She must speak as she would in an ordinary conversation and not try to imitate the forceful, emotive style of male Tablighi speakers.

As well as serving as a learning forum for the women muballighin or Tablighi volunteers, the jama'at also functions as a means for communicating the Tablighi message to other Muslim women in the places that the jama'at visits. Local women are to be invited to join the muballighin in the house in which they are put up. This is done by the husbands or male mehram relatives accompanying the women muballighin. They first approach local male Tablighi activists, and along with them go from house to house exhorting the men to send their wives to join their women in ta'lim or learning sessions. When going to the venue of the ta'lim local women should be accompanied by their husbands or a male mehram relative and must be covered in full pardah. Like the female muballighin, they must be very simply dressed. There must be no ostentatious display of jewellery or fine clothes, and every effort should be made to conform to a standard of radical equality.

Besides attending the ta'lim sessions organized by visiting women's jama'ats, local Tablighi activists are expected to arrange for weekly meetings ('ijtima) where local women get together to learn about the chhe baten, listen to narrations from the books of faza'il and imbibe the teaching of the TJ. Such 'ijtimas must, however, be started only after getting permission from the local Tablighi headquarters (markaz).

Women's jama'ats, as well as the periodic local-level 'ijtimas, also serve as occasions where women can gather together, an opportunity rarely afforded to them in families where strict pardah is observed. Although they are expected to spend all their time in meditation, prayer and learning, as well as teaching other women about Islam, women can find in these occasions spaces where they can share their own stories, their own joys and sorrows, with each other. Thus, Rukaiyya Begum, a woman who works in a non-governmental development agency in Barisal, Bangladesh, speaks of how some male Tablighi activists in her town are critical of the women's jama'ats and 'ijtimas because, according to them, 'women who attend them spend much of their simply gossiping with each other rather than talking and thinking only about the din (religion)'. ' They might talk about their children or their problems with their mothers-in-law or even about the risking price of rice and fish,' she says, and this irks the men because they see these as worldly (duniyavi) matters that completely distract one from the single-minded pursuit of the din.5

Women's jama'ats can also prove to be occasions for women to get away from domestic chores and family responsibilities for a while. They are not allowed to take their children with them on jama'at, as otherwise their attention might be diverted from the mission of Tabligh. Thus, for a few days, women can leave their household tasks and their children in the care of other women and gain a respite from the drudgery of domestic work. Gulshan Siddiqui, a housewife from Dhaka, who once traveled on jama'at, but is now no longer involved in the TJ, describes her experience thus:

I had been married for seven years and every day, day in and day out, it was the same old routine – cooking, washing, cleaning, making endless cups of tea for my father-in-law, scrubbing the floors. I badly needed a break. My husband was deeply involved in Tabligh work in those days. One day, he came home from the Tablighi markaz and told me that we both should go for a few days on jama'at. At first, I was apprehensive. I did not know what I would have to do. But later I found that I had really enjoyed myself. I learnt so much, and, besides that, visited some places that I had never been to before. And those few days provided me some respite from the monotony of housework.6

Notions of Femininity and the Ideal Muslim Woman


The pedagogical function of the women's jama'ats and local 'ijtimas is not simply limited to imbibing the teachings of the chhe baten and the stories from the books of faza'il. Women's groups in the TJ serve as crucial arenas where women's identities are sought to be crucially re-defined in line with Tablighi understandings of the ideal Muslim woman. Indeed, this can be seen, in some sense, as the central function of Tablighi work among women. Through the lectures of the muballighin and Tablighi elders and through numerous Tablighi-type texts an attempt is made constantly to communicate and reinforce the image of what is regarded as model Islamic womanhood.

Tablighi notions of ideal Islamic femininity echo, for the most part, the Deobandi understanding of the role of women as wives and mothers. To reinforce the image of the submissive wife Tablighi texts freely draw on weak (za'if) and concocted (mauzu) traditions (ahadith) attributed to the Prophet, which critics argue are completely violative of the actual Qur'anic mandate of gender equality and which were later fabricated in order to lend support to extreme patriarchal notions. As a wife, a Tablighi ideologue writes, a Muslim woman must constantly remember that God has appointed her husband as her master (sardar). To obey him (uski ita'at karna) is a duty (farz) that is binding on her (Ferozepuri n.d., 104). Participation in jihad not being a farz (religious duty) for a woman, she can gain the same divine reward simply by being obedient to her husband ('Azmi 1993, 1-2). If her husband should, for any reason, get angry with her, a woman should bear his wrath cheerfully and not complain ('Alam 1995 11-12). One Tablighi writer approvingly quotes a story attributed to the Prophet, according to which Muhammad is said to have declared: 'O Woman! Your heaven and tell is your husband' ('Azmi 1993, 2). This, he says, implies that a woman 'will enter heaven if the husband is pleased with her and hell if he is displeased with her'. He goes on to adduce a long list of forty more such stories attributed to the Prophet to prove his point that, in order to gain bliss in this world and the hereafter, a woman must follow every command of her husband, should bear his anger cheerfully, and should not protest when he does wrong.7

This view is repeated in several other tracts written by other writers associated with the TJ. Some of these texts are specifically targeted at a female readership. A good illustration of this is an Urdu book titled Muslim Khawatin ke Liye Bees Sabaq ('Twenty Lessons for Muslim Women'), written by a leading Indian Tablighi scholar, Maulana 'Ashiq Elahi Bulandshahri. This book, suggests the author, 'should reach every single house' in order to 'put an end to the increasing deviance (ghaflat) on the part of women'. In addition, he strongly recommends that it be included in the school curriculum for Muslim girls (Bulandshahri n.d., 4).

A central concern of this book is the portrayal of the ideal Muslim wife. Quoting numerous reports attributed to the Prophet, the author argues that only that wife who willingly obeys the commands (hukm) of her husband and does not answer him back shall gain entry into heaven. According to one report that he cites, the prayers of three people shall not be accepted by God: a runaway slave until he returns to his master; a person in an intoxicated state; and a wife whose husband is angry with her. The Prophet, he claims, had himself declared that the majority of the inhabitants to hell would be women who were ungrateful to their husbands and used foul language (Ibid., 56-57).

The ideal Muslim woman is seen in Tablighi discourse as bound within the four walls of her home. The moment she steps out of the house, says Bulandshahri, the devil (shaytan) himself begins to accompany her (Ibid., 78). 'God has told men that he has made women for them' and 'she is the ornamentation (zinat) of your home', another Tablighi activist tells his (presumably all-male) readers. She must be hidden 'even more carefully than silver, gold and precious stones'. Allowing her to go out of the home will result in all manner of fitna, he warns. Just as if costly things are left outside the home, robbers and dacoits and even otherwise honest people will be tempted to steal them, so also if a woman 'is paraded outside without pardah', the 'lascivious eyes' of men will fall on her. This will 'open the doors of adultery (zina)' and the woman will lose her shame and modesty' (Ferozepuri n.d., 103).

Furthermore, Tablighi scholars advise that care should be taken that women do not adorn (banao singhar) themselves, for they might otherwise become 'a great source of temptation' for men and, consequently, a perennial source of fitna. Such women are assured that they shall 'neither gain admittance into heaven and nor even get to smell its fragrance' (Khan n.d., 5). Likewise, and for the same reason, women should wear only very simple clothes and should not use any make-up, for the Prophet is said to have declared that God cursed the Children of Israel for having let their women dress in such a manner (Ibid., 10).

Since woman is a thing that must be 'hidden' (chhippana) from ghayr males, if, under dire necessity, she has to step out of the house, she should do so only in the company of a male mehram relative, and that too in strict pardah. On such occasions she must cover herself, says a Tablighi 'alim, with a burqa (veil) that stretches from heat to foot, covering the entire face as well. So as not to attract any male attention, the burqa must be as simple as possible. It should not be decorated or embroidered.8 Even in the house, she must not appear before any non-mehram male. She should never even see any such man, even though the man may be blind. This is because just as it is forbidden (haram) for a man to see a non-mehram woman, so, too, must a woman never see a non-mehram man (Khan n.d., 3). She must not be present at any place where she can see a non-mihram man.9 She must not even open a window to look out if her face is not covered. If she goes to the market she must not, under any circumstances, lift the veil from off her face, not even to see what she is buying (Bulandshahri n.d., 75). Indeed, says this writer, pardah is so important that is must be observed with the same degree of strictness as with non-mehram males with certain classes of non-Muslim (kafir) women. Interestingly, under this category he mentions only women from the 'low' Hindu Dhobi (washermen), Bhangi (sweeper) and Chamar (cobbler) castes, though he does not specify why he singles these out among all others (Ibid., 76-77).

Since the ideal Muslim woman must be confined to the house, her sphere of work is the myriad household tasks that she must perform. These tasks must not be seen as drudgery, however, for great heavenly rewards are said to await the woman who performs them cheerfully as religious duties. Thus, a leading Tablighi elder writes that the woman who massages the tired body of her husband without having been asked to do so acquires the merit equivalent to giving seven tolas of gold in charity (sadaqa). However, if she were to do this only on being requested by her husband, she still gets a reward, but this time only that for giving away seven tolas of silver (Khan n.d., 5). Elsewhere, this source puts the reward for the former as equal to half of that a martyr (shahid) (Hadiser Aloke). Great divine blessings also await that woman who does all her domestic chores properly and tends to her children (Khan n.d., 2-5). Thus, the woman who feeds her child with her own milk gets the reward of one good deed (neki) for each drop that is drunk. The woman who sweeps her house while engrossed in zikr will receive with the reward for sweeping the Ka'aba itself (Hadiser Aloke).

Domestic work alone is the proper sphere for women. While performing all these tasks, a woman should constantly be engrossed in zikr, the remembrance and praise of God. Her spare time she should spend in zikr and namaz and in counting her rosary (tasbih). She must say her prayers five times a day in a space kept apart in the house itself, for that is her mosque. She should recite (tilawat) portions of the Qur'an every day as well as a number of Arabic supplications. She should also make adequate arrangements for the religious training (tarbiyat) of her children. In this regard, she should strive to follow the example of Khamsa, a Muslim woman who, during the rule of the second Sunni caliph 'Umar, cheerfully sent her four sons on jihad against the unbelievers where they all lost their lives on the battlefield (Akhtar ul-'Alam 1995, 3-14).

Besides properly carrying out the various domestic tasks that have been assigned to her, a woman is promised great heavenly rewards if she takes care of her own appearance to please her husband and to conform to the demands of proper Islamic hygiene. Thus, according to one leading Tablighi elder, if a woman lowers her head in humility, properly combs her hair with a central parting (chir), uses a tooth-stick (miswak) to clean her teeth, cuts her nails regularly, shaves her pubic hair and arm-pits, uses a cloth during her menses and properly cleans herself after excretion , she will receive the enormous reward equal to that of a hundred martyrs (shuhada), and shall be blessed with the intercession (shafa'at) of Muhammad on the Day of Judgment (hashr), because that is the blessing that God has announced for every sunna or practice of the Prophet, both great and small, that has gone into disuse and is revived in this age (Hadiser Aloke).

No longer on the Margins? Muslim Women and the TJ Islamization Project


The active involvement of women in public Tabligh activity, an arena hitherto completely closed to them, coupled with the traditional images of Muslim womanhood that the TJ seeks to project and constantly reinforce, provides what seems, at best, an ambiguous and confused portrayal of the role and status of the ideal woman Tablighi volunteer. Is the Tablighi agenda for Muslim women to be seen simply as bringing them to participate actively in their own subordination and confinement within the iron cage of patriarchal tradition? Much evidence suggests that the concern of the TJ with the question of women can, in fact, be seen as a reaction on the part of male defenders of tradition to the threat of increasing female independence. Thus, in his introduction to a pamphlet directed specifically at women written by a leading Tablighi elder, a Tablighi activist writes that the need for Tabligh work among women is today 'particularly urgent', as increasing numbers of female are 'going in for co-education, have started reading novels and stories, are watching television and going to the cinema, are strolling freely in parks, and are increasingly going out of the house without a mehram male to accompany them'. This, he says, is making women lose 'all sense of shame'. He castigates Western feminism as having only 'further bound' women in heavy chains. As a way out of what he sees as this growing 'irreligiousness' on the part of women, he suggests that girls and women must 'always remain in strict pardah, mix only with pious Muslim women and should read only those books that strengthen their faith', particularly those that contain stories about the wives of the Companions of Muhammad and brave Muslim women.10 In a similar vein, another Tablighi activist puts the entire burden of women's low status on the fact that they are 'abandoning the pardah', all in the name of 'female liberation' (Palanpuri 1995 35-36).

However, to see Muslim women in the TJ as simply passive collaborators in a project designed to curb all assertion and agency on their part would, perhaps, not be doing justice to the great complexity of the situation. For, although the movement aims at reinforcing the traditional gender division of labour, it affords, in the process, new role models for women to emulate which can be seen as providing, at one level, significant departures from traditional gender norms. What is particularly interesting here is the central role that women come to be seen as playing in the spread of normative Islam, a role that in South Asia at least, had hardly been envisaged for them before.

In some Tablighi accounts women are portrayed as, in some sense, capable of making greater sacrifices for Islam than men. God, says the late Enam ul-Hasan (d. 1995), the third amir of the TJ, has made women 'weak' and 'emotional', as opposed to men, whom He has made 'strong', 'brave' and 'relatively hard-hearted'. (Nizami 1993, 21). Because of their 'tenderness', many Muslim women have displayed a greater receptivity to Islam than have many men. Thus, Abu Lahab, an uncle of the Prophet, stiffly opposed Muhammad, and another uncle of his, Abu Talib, refused to recite the Islamic creed of confession even on his death-bed despite being convinced of Muhammad's divine mission, while all of Muhammad's aunts had accepted Islam in his lifetime (Ibid., 23). Likewise, the first martyr in the cause of Islam was a woman, Samiya, and it was a woman, 'Umar's sister, who was instrumental in bringing 'Umar, later the second Sunni Caliph, into the Muslim fold. In the same manner, Akramah, who later went on to sacrifice his life in a battle for Islam, was brought to Islam by his wife (Ibid., 25-27). Muslim women are exhorted to take these women as role models to emulate, as also the Prophet's wives – Khadija, the first convert to Islam, who helped Muhammad by consoling him when he was the target of oppression by his enemies in Mecca and assisted in his mission with her wealth, and 'Aisha, a renowned narrator of many ahadith herself, who taught the Qur'an and the Prophetic traditions to the Muslim women of Medina (Ibid., 33-35, cf. Qasmi 1995, 25-26).

As active agents in the project of Islamization, Muslim women need first to enhance their own knowledge and strengthen their own practice of Islam through participation in the work of the TJ. They are then to share this knowledge with others, although keeping strictly within the confines of pardah. Most importantly, they must now see themselves as playing a crucial role in transmitting Islam to their children, bringing them up to be pious, committed Muslims. They are, a Tablighi elder writes, to consider themselves as the first madrasa or school of their children (Khan n.d., 12). Women must also make every effort to encourage their husbands to spend as much time as they can on Tabligh work. A woman who sends her husband 'on the path of Allah' for Tabligh work and maintains her modesty while he is away will, or so promises a Tablighi elder, 'enter heaven 500 years before her husband, where she will be crowned as the sardar of 70 thousand angels and heavenly houris'. She will, he says, 'be bathed in the waters of heaven and, seated on a horse made of yaqut, will await the arrival of her family' (Ibid., 2-3). The rewards for encouraging their men folk to go regularly on Tabligh work may actually be received by women in this world itself for, according to a Bangladeshi Tablighi activist, 'It is possible that husbands doing Tableeg would be comparatively more religious and be loyal to their wives' because, by being fully engrossed in Tabligh work, 'they might have less time to run after other women' (Shamsul 'Alam 1993, 727).

Within the family setting, Tabligh work may open up new spaces for women, who may now appear to exercise greater say in religious affairs than has hitherto been allowed for. At least half an hour must be set apart every day when the family should get together for what is called the ghar ki ta'lim session (Qasmi n.d.). In the course of this, the Fazail-i'Amal (Zakariyya 1990), the main book of faza'il used in the TJ, and the chhe baten should be read out by the husband, wife or children. According to one Tablighi source, women should actually take the responsibility of organizing the ghar ki ta'lim because their men folk have usually to go out of their homes to work (Akhtar ul-'Alam 1995, 5). Another part of the day should be fixed for the husband and wife to discuss how best they can improve the Islamic milieu of their home. From here they can progress to planning Tabligh work for their locality, city, country and, eventually, the whole world. Women must also make every effort to spread the message of the TJ to all their female relatives, guests, and neighbours who come to their homes, as well as even to female beggars who knock on their doors, soliciting alms (Nadwi 1983, 40), Women, thus, are provided with a new instrumentality that they hitherto have lacked.

One can also observe in Tablighi discourse on women a hidden critique of certain traditional notions of femininity and domesticity. Exhorting women to follow the example of the wives of the Prophet, Enam ul-Hasan writes that whereas today women find themselves in the kitchen almost the whole day, in the homes of the wives of Muhammad the stoves were lit only very occasionally. They spent but little time cooking, for their habits were simple, and they and the Prophet subsisted largely on dates and water for months, while sometimes an Ansar of Medina would send some milk to them as a gift. Even this milk, he notes, was drunk without having to be boiled. Likewise, marriages in the days of the Prophet were conducted with almost no expense, unlike today when the bride's family must spend a great deal of money, often having to land in deep debt as a result (Ibid., 29-31). In line with this great stress on simplicity and austere frugality, at large Tablighi gatherings it is common for mass marriages to be arranged at little cost to either side, and sometimes dispensing with the customary dowry which, in South Asia, can been seen as a crucial symbol of the devaluation of female worth.

Conclusion
Probably the most widespread Islamic movement in the world today, the TJ has its roots in the reformist tradition that emerged is South Asia in the wake of Muslim political decline and the rise of British power in the region. In the absence of Muslim political authority, for the reformist 'ulama who emerged in this period, every Muslim, man as well as woman, now had the onerous responsibility of 'preserving' and 'protecting' Islam. Growing out of the Deobandi concern for the 'proper' Islamization of Muslim women, who were seen as the bastion of 'superstition' and 'un-Islamic', 'Hinduistic' traditions, the TJ made women's active involvement an integral part of the reformist Islamization agenda.

The implications for Muslim women of the efforts of the TJ seem to send different signals for patriarchy. On the one hand, the TJ seeks to impose on Muslim society an extremely restricted and narrow gender regime as a response to the challenges of modernity. In this process, not only are the traditional sources of women's subordination sought to be reinforced, but even the limited spaces afforded to women within traditional custom-laden South Asian Islam, such as attendance at Sufi shrines, are fiercely attached as 'un-Islamic' aberrations. Because of the importance that is placed on the regular reading of specific texts in Tablighi circles one might expect involvement in the TJ to help promote literacy among women active in the movement. No firm statistical evidence can be cited in this regard, however. That Tabligh activity may not necessarily lead to greater female literacy is evident from the fact that in Mewat, which is held by Tablighi activists to be their most successful experimental ground, the female literacy rate is said to be no more than an abysmal 2 per cent. On the other hand, the TJ provides women with new sources of mobility and a significant instrumentality within the family and the neighborhood as active agents in the Islamization process. Furthermore, within the sternly patriarchal discourse of the TJ, one can discern a faint critique of certain traditional structures of male supremacy.

NOTES
1. For a detailed study of the Tablighi Jama'at, see Sikand, 2001. See also Nadwi, 1983 and Anwar ul- Haq 1972. For a good summary of the basic principles of the TJ, see Metcalf 1994.

2. For selected portions of the book translated into English, see Metcalf 1990.
3. Wali ul-Islam 1996,15. The length and frequency of Tabligh tours for men differs in certain respects from this, however.
4. A mehram relative is one, such as a son or father, whom a woman is forbidden to marry under Islamic law.

5. Interview with Rukaiyya Begum, Barisal, 11 November 1996.
6. Interview with Gulshan Siddiqui, Dhaka, 15 November 1996.
7. 'Azmi 1993, 1-10. Several of these reports are mauzu (fabricated) or za'if (weak) and not sahih (authentic). Several critics of the TJ have pointed out that the books of faza'il used in the TJ can be faulted on the grounds of containing stories attributed to the Prophet that are actually concocted. Further, even in the case of authenticated Hadith reports, there is the possibility of their being interpreted in ways different from how they are seen in Tablighi circles.

 8. Bulandshahri, 70. A Bangladeshi Tablighi activist writes that the burqa covering the entire body, including the face, is compulsory for all Muslim women because, he says, this it the 'age of fitna (disorder)' (At-Turag, No.80, 1 January 1993, 12-13).
9. Bulandshahri, 74-75. Thus Khan (n.d., 10) quotes a story, according to which the Prophet once asked his Companions to tell him which woman was the most superior ('ala) in terms of qualities (sifat). 'Ali, on hearing this, went to his house. His wife, and the Prophet's daughter, Fatima, told him that woman was superior to all who 'neither sees a ghair mard ('strange man') nor is seen by such a man'.
10. 'Abdul Matin's introduction to Palanpuri n.d., 8-9 Cf. Ferozepuri n.d. 104.

REFERENCES:
AKHTAR UL 'ALAM, Muhammad (1995) Ma-Bonder Athti Kaj (Dhaka, Al-Amin Academy).
ANWAR UL-HAQ. M (1972) The Faith Movement of Mawlana Muhammad Ilyas (London, George Allen & Unwin).
AZMI, Majaz (1993) Guidance for a Muslim Wife (New Delhi, Idara-i Isha'at-i Diniyat).
BULANDSHAHRI, Muhammad 'Ashiq Elahi (n.d.) Muslim Khawatin Ke Liye Bees Sabaq (New Delhi, Idara-i Isha'at-i Diniyat).
FARUQI, Zia ur-Rahman (1992) 'Ulama-i-Deoband: Kaun Hain, Kya Hain? (Deoband, Dar ul-Kitab).
FEROZEPURI, Muhammad 'Isa (n.d.) Tabligh Ka Muqami Kam (Delhi, Rabbani Book Depot.)
Hadiser Aloke – Mahilader Jonno Hazrat Maulana Sa'eed Ahmad Khan Sahiber (Bengali leaflet, no publication details).
IKRAM, Shaikh Muhammad (1963) Mauj-i Kausar, Vol.3 (Karachi, Feroze Sons).
KHAN, Sa'eed Ahmad (n.d.) Khawatin Ke Liye Rah-i Nijat (New Delhi, Mushtaq Ahmad).
METCALF, Barbara D. (1990) Perfecting Women: Maulana Ashraf 'Ali Thanawi's Bihishti Zewar (Los Angeles & Oxford, University of California Press).
METCALF, Barbara D. (1994) 'Islamic Self-fashioning in a Global Movement of Spiritual Revival', in: M.E. Marty & R.S. Appleby (eds.), Accounting for Fundamentalisms: The Dynamic Character of Movements (Chicago & London, University of Chicago Press), 706-725.
NADWI, Sayyed Abul Hasan 'Ali (1983) The Life and Mission of Maulana Muhammad Ilyas (Lucknow, Nadwat ul-'Ulama).
NIZAMI, Muhammad Khalid (Ed.) (1993) Paygham-i Falah (Dhanbad, Dini Ta'limi Board).
PALANPURI, Muhammad 'Umar (n.d.) Ma-Behen-Beti-Bivi Ki Nijat Ke Liye Rah-i Nijat (New Delhi, Taj Book Depot).
PALANPURI, 'Umar Bin Muhammad 'Umar (1995) 'Auroton Ne Apna Maqam Ko Kho Diya', Husn-i Ikhlaq, February.
QASMI, Muhammad Azfar Jamal (Ed.) (1995) London Ki Khawatin Se Maulana Ahmad Lat Sahib Ka Tablighi Khitab (Jalalpur, Paygham Book Depot).
QASMI, Muhammad Rashid (n.d.) Ghar Ki Ta'lim (Kamalpur, Daftar-i Jami'a Arabia Imdad ul-Islam).
SHAMSUL 'ALAM, A.Z.M. (1993) The Message of Tableeg and Da'wah (Dhaka, Islamic Foundation, Bangladesh).
SIKAND, Yoginder (2001) The Origins and Development of the Tablighi Jama'at (1920s-2000): A Cross-Country Comparative Study ( New Delhi, Orient Longman).
WALIUL ISLAM (1996) Tablighi Jama'ater Unpanchash Koti Shawab, Mashturater Mehnat o Shadi Poda Namajer Poriniti (Dhaka, Sultanuddin Ahmad, Tat Turg Prokashini, Madrasa Dar ul-Akram).
ZAKARIYYA, Muhammad (1990) Faza'il-i 'Amal (New Delhi, Idara-i Isha'at-i Diniyat).

 

 



__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___