Banner Advertiser

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

[ALOCHONA] Huge arms, ammo hauled from madrassa in Bhola

Huge arms, ammo hauled from madrassa in Bhola

 



Rapid Action Battalion (RAB) personnel on Tues-day seized huge firearms and ammunition, walkie-talkie and remote control sets and grenade parts from a madrassa at Barun-bazar in Borhanuddin upa-zila which was allegedly turned into arsenal of militants.

Official sources said two JMB suspects-one a teacher, the other caretaker of the madrassa-were arrested during the arms haul.Acting on a tip-off, a team of RAB-8 unit of the elite force, led by Major Mamun, raided the foreign NGO-run Islamic educational institution named Green Crescent at about 12 noon.
The madrassa is run by a London-based NGO under the same name, 'Green Crescent', reportedly headed by a Ban-gladesh expatriate.

They searched out a cache of arms that includes two pistols, two revolvers, two shotguns, two rifles, one nipper rifle, 1,000 bullets, 3,000 splinters used for making grenade, several blasters, huge gunpowder, two walkie-talkies, two remote controls and several hundred jihad books from the madrassa.
During the drive, the elite force also arrested Russel, a teacher of the madrassa, and its caretaker Waliullah. RAB sources said the NGO was financed and patronized by Foysal, nephew of former minister Maj Hafeez.. They said militants used the madrassa as a "training camp in the guise of teaching orphans".

Police Super Azizur Rahman was on the spot when the last report came at 5:15pm. The busting of the suspected den of the banned militant outfit took place at a time when a near-phobia about militants prevails following the carnage in the BDR headquarters that left almost al the army officers in command of the border force dead.
 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Savar ancient site left unprotected

Savar ancient site left unprotected
 
 

The "Harishchandra Rajar Dhibi" in Savar may appear to the visitors as a dump, garage, poultry farm or any sleazy place, but obviously never a 'protected' archaeological site.The government has not yet conducted a nationwide survey to trace or detect how many ancient sites are there in the country.

The way the Department of Archaeology maintains the site only 32 kilometres off from the capital would definitely take visitors, if there is any, by surprise. They might even wonder what is happening to those sites scattered elsewhere across the country. But it's really no wonder the scenario is the same in almost everywhere in Bangladesh.The government has not yet conducted a nationwide survey to trace or detect how many ancient sites are there in the country.

As many as 391 archaeological sites, many of which have already been encroached, have so far been announced "protected" since the British rule here. "Harishchandra Rajar Dhibi" in Savar is one of those.A metalled road crosses a part of "Harishchandra Rajar Dhibi" on which heavy vehicles including goods-laden trucks ply all day long. A brick-built room stands at one point where a deep tube-well was installed once. Now people use the building for drying cow dung.

Animal faeces are in fact dried all over the site. The excavated parts where Buddhists probably practiced traditional art and culture around 1,000 years ago are nearly filled up with people binning garbage every day..The "Dhibi" also stinks as a poultry farm stands close to it in addition to herds of cattle grazing on the site.

In sheer contrast to the scenario in Bangladesh, movement of people is restricted over a certain number in Ellora and Ajanta in neighbouring India to avoid noise pollution and damage to archaeological sites, which have buffer zones for protection."This is most unfortunate and very dangerous for our national heritage. The scenario is almost same in all the heritage sites across the country," said Asiatic Society of Bangladesh President Prof Sirajul Islam."We have been neglecting our heritage over the years. We are dealing with our heritage in such a way that it won't survive much long," he added.

Noted historian Prof Abdul Momin Chowdhury suggests that a board of experts from multiple disciplines might be formed to deal with the declining archaeological sites. He said, "The ministry did not care much in this regard and caused severe degeneration to our antiquities.""Rejuvenation and upgradation of the archaeology department is a must as it lacks skilled human resources and adequate funds. What is done is done but degeneration of the antiquities shouldn't be allowed anymore," he added.

"It's very sad. The government must bring an immediate end to its negligence in dealing with antiquities. If the archaeology department has resources and fund crisis then the problem must be addressed immediately," observed Prof Sharif Uddin Ahmed.

Only a 15-minute rickshaw ride from the "Dhibi" leads to yet another sad tale of Bangladesh archaeology. Rajashan, another protected site measuring five acres and 17 decimals, has entirely been encroached.Despite a court order in 2003 to have the site in possession, the archaeology department lost its possession of the site as an individual named Shajahan, nephew of local ward commissioner Quader, is using it as personal property.

The Daily Star tried several days but found no-one at the archaeology department who is entrusted to look after these sites. Instead, everyone said they were not responsible for the job. The officials were found even ignorant about the matters and reluctant to know anything about the sites' present status.A guard from the department has been employed to look after the sites, but it's simply impossible for him, especially when his bosses turn a blind eye.

Contacted, Director General in-charge of archaeology department Abdul Khaleque said: "I can't accept allegations of negligence by the department in conservation, preservation and restoration immediately. It has to be checked and requires debates and discussions in determining whether any wrong was done in carrying out the job."He denied commenting on specific allegations of neglect in Panam in Sonargaon, Shat Gambuz Mosque and Harishchandra Rajar Dhibi until he goes through necessary documents.

The previous DG, Shafiqul Alam, who has recently gone on LPR, said, "In reality the place is not in our possession. We informed the local administration, police and UNO several times but they did not help us. The department does not have enough manpower to keep the place secured.""Who will take the responsibility for the loss? These are our priceless property. If the sites are lost the government must be held accountable," said Prof Shah Sufi Mustafizur Rahman of archaeology department, Jahangirnagar University."An extensive and intensive survey to identify the archaeological sites of Bangladesh is a must; otherwise there will be no records of the sites one day," he added.

STATUS OF RAJASHAN

Shajahan has built a one-storey building on the site. He earns Tk 700 to Tk 1,200 from each of the 25 rooms in rent. He also owns five groceries there, while his family members long ago sold a part of the site. Moreover, he has also built a luxurious two-storey building on the 'protected' archaeology site.

He has 'allowed' some of his followers on the land to encroach the entire site. Recently he 'permitted' a man to set up a rickshaw garage there for a monthly payment of Tk 500.Speaking defiantly, Shahjahan's wife claimed they have court order and have seen so many journalists and newspaper reports that they don't bother about the media any more.Shahjahan admitted to constructing establishments on the land but denied making further comments..

Locals allege Shahjahan regularly bribe some archaeology department officials so that the matter gathers dust. The Department, on the other hand, pins the blame on the local administration including the UNO and the municipality chairman for their failure to evict the encroachers.Shahjahan began grabbing the land by filing a case claiming the land to be his ancestral property.

In response, a Dhaka court in June 2003 directed the archaeology department to acquire the land. Shahjahan appealed to the High Court in July and the court asked the department for necessary papers.The HC also sought papers from the Dhaka court and the papers took four years to be sent to HC. No hearing was held on the appeal as the Department did not take any measures in this regard.

Marksman Shah Alam, responsible to revive the case, said, "I do not know the present status of the case. I went to the High Court two months ago and learned no date is declared to hold hearing on the appeal."He mentioned that they have informed the police, UNO office and even joint forces in vain. The Department also filed a general diary with Savar police on June 15, 2005 regarding the matter. "I cannot say anything about it as I don't know much," said Field Officer Abul Bashar, another official involved with the site.Contacted, Regional Director Abdul Khaleque could not recognise the protected Rajashan site and denied to comment saying he was busy with an enquiry.

SITE HISTORY

Savar occupies an important place in the early medieval history of Bangladesh. Harendra Nath Ghosh conducted an excavation here for the first time in 1913 and 1915. The British Raj announced the palace of King Harishchandra a protected archaeological site in 1920, according to a journal published by the archaeology department, Jahangirnagar University in 2004.

Antiquities recovered from the site include turquoise blue glazed ware, silver coin, brick, bronze materials, Stupa and Vihara and inscription.A research by JU found 65 archaeological sites in the area. Eight were discovered earlier and the rest by the university teams. The discovery of Stupa and Vihara establishes the place as a Buddhist seat during the early medieval period.

The Buddhist sculptures found at several places in the country include Lalmai and Maynamati in Comilla, Paharpur in Naogaon and Mahastangarh in Bogra.

http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news....s.php?nid=81219



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Moderated by intolerant Wahabi fascist

 
We all got few rejections from various forums. This is the nature of the bloging. Sometime back I tagged a weblink regarding camput Sajib Wajed Joy. Next day, the link is not there any more. Thrilling as it could be, I did not persue it any further. Turkmna, aka, Asghar, Shamim Chowdhury, etcectra, are in same league of condeming others with obnoxious chants when they recount trapidations. More like Hasina, these blurry bubblers skew facts with fictions, they dream JMB & BanglaBhai in daylight and nixes every opportunity to their opponents. They throw spears with full venom to others; pretending as a gentleman hanging their arms behind!
 
There are few neophites, just sloshing from dung as a ladybug, flying high as an intellect, quoting from AJC (that durango living in a foreign land collecting Social Security money, faux-kambala from '71)  prefix his name with Engr.; notion is, that will make him more authentic & indegenious.

Of course, there are few fruit-flies, they come and go, with little or no gray-matter, not to mention anyone particular in mind! You know them all by now.
 
Peace,
--- On Tue, 3/24/09, afirozny <afirozny@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: afirozny <afirozny@yahoo.com>
Subject: [khabor.com] Re: Dahuk yahoo group: Moderated by intolerant Wahabi fascist
To: khabor@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 2:59 AM

Mr. Shamim

Since Moderators of Alochona does not post any of my articles, why should I be calling them Islamic fascist or wahabi fascist? What Islam has to do with their reasonings not to publish my write-ups? Or What role does play on Alochona's moderators mind of the inpretation of Wahabi in deciding not to publish my articles? I just can't grasp it as to why should I be calling them as such terms that you are accustomed of.

As Islam does not have any compulsion whatsoever on the matters of opinions or any actions/deeds of others, so why should they be termed as Islamic fascist?

If they would understood Islam, then, I think, Alochona would have approved my messages as well as Dahuk. Wrongly labeling or name calling of others does reflect lack of knowledge of yours and that's should be rephrehensible. And it is a misdirection of your anger toward them.

We should protest against the craven attitude of our Bangladeshi forums' moderators with the dignified language that describe them the best.

Would you mind in explaining as to why do you use those terms to describe their actions/deeds?

Thank you.

Firoz Alam

--- In khabor@yahoogroups. com, Shamim Chowdhury <veirsmill@. ..> wrote:

Intolerant Wahabi Islamic fascist sect moderates Dahuk yahoo group. As a rule, they will not post any dissenting views-comments, if not certified by ultra orthodox wahabisam. When they do post dissenting view moderator himself/herself will twist it so much that originality of the posters views will be lost.
 
This attitude of not giving a chance to dissenting view is common among Washabist but without a doubt, this is very sad.

Thanks

Shamim Chowdhury
Maryland, USA




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Re: We are the masters of our own destiny

we do not need to forget the atrocities of Pak Army (and their collaborators) to have diplomatic relation with Pakistan. Israel have never fogotten the atrocities of Jews in Germany. They do have good relation with Germany.

--- On Mon, 3/23/09, maqsud omaba <maqsudo@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: maqsud omaba <maqsudo@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] Re: We are the masters of our own destiny
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, March 23, 2009, 4:36 AM

only morons with immatured attitude, stupid ideas...will discourage normalization of relationship with pak + india.

Whatever cruel, violent activities.. .people + govt + army of Pakistan did, in 1971, is in history, we don't need to waste time talking about it, every week.

What we need is good diplomacy for the country, diplomacy and policies that will help Bangladesh to win in political fields.


Bangladesh is not that rich, powerful, resourceful nation that can afford to create numerous enemies in the neighbourhood.

I wish some one will import a special computer, to perform special CT of brain of all those loud Bdeshis, who talk
about rajakars, anti-liberation forces and liberation war, non-stop, every-week, every month,without contributing anything to the country.

They are the one, who created fertile ground for criminals to act against the country. They are the one who assist miscreants to plan. execute BDR incident in the country.

If they wanted to do something for the nation, they would have explored more closely what quality of education madrasa students get,
why madrasas are fertile ground to create dangerous young people, they would have condemned violence + corruption more visibly, and they would have boycotted corrupt politicians.

Boktreeta baji...one of our national sports, will be of no use for our development and to achieve a more safe Bdesh.

Cheers.

dr. maqsud omar







To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com
From: thoughtocrat@ yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:04:07 -0700
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Re: We are the masters of our own destiny

I am confused here. I dont quite follow your point. What story did I change or shift from? Go back at least 5 years and look up my comments in Alochona. I have consistently advocated for normalizing relationship with both India and Pakistan. What's wrong with that? That makes me a rajakar or a terrorist? Considering that my father is a freedom fighter, I take offense in that statement.  And yes, we have no business with India or Pakistan's internal issues, just the way they have no business in interfering in ours. That's precisely why I don't care if Isha Khan or Munshi keeps posting statements and "critical analysis" about India and Pakistan.


From: zjafreen <zjafreen@yahoo. com>
To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 12:10:00 PM
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Re: We are the masters of our own destiny

Rajakar bait and switch, Cyrus chase shifting story and the story is what is on his mind is that India's internal issues that we have nothing to do with it. If someone who had opposed the millitary means to achive independence from then west pakistan and make em "Rajakar", don't you think, who went to india and fought against pakistani regime make them terrorist?








__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Licensed to terror – Bangladesh style

curious. is it the same Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury who was arrested by BNP govt for being an Israeli Agent?
By the way, I am against all terrorism.

--- On Mon, 3/23/09, maqsud omaba <maqsudo@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: maqsud omaba <maqsudo@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] Licensed to terror – Bangladesh style
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, March 23, 2009, 9:37 AM



" The attackers enjoyed blessings from one Shintu, proclaiming to be the advisor to Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Earlier, this Shintu called my office and demanded TK. 500,000 [equivalent to US$ 9200] as extortion. He in a harsh voice told me that the amount was required for organizational purpose of the ruling party. It was later learnt that this man continues to use the name of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and a number of top figures in the government, in continuing various forms of illegal activities. Activities of this man is within the knowledge of the ruling party leaders, but, he is allowed in continuing such activities as it has become a regular culture in Bangladesh for some musclemen and thugs to do whatever they wish when their party is in power."


to all those sub-cultured, brain-dead, AL thugs....any comment...on this new item???

shoib...is after all ,  well-known, brave, neutral journalist in Bdesh.

dr. maqsud omar




To: zoglul@hotmail. co.uk; shahin72@gmail. com; alfazanambd@ yahoo.com; rehman.mohammad@ gmail.com; ahmadashiqulhamid@ yahoo.com; farhadmazhar@ hotmail.com; mahmudurart@ yahoo.com; kmamalik@aol. com; dhakamails@yahoogro ups.com; alochona@yahoogroup s.com; bdresearchers@ yahoogroups. com; bangla-vision@ yahoogroups. com; mouchakaydheel@ yahoo.com; delwar98@hotmail. com; serajurrahman@ btinternet. com; odhora@yahoogroups. com; ayeshakabir@ yahoo.com; sayantha15@yahoo. com; minarrashid@ yahoo.com; history_islam@ yahoogroups. com; udarakash08@ yahoo.com; dahuk@yahoogroups. com; shahahmadreza@ yahoo.com; hossain.khilji@ yahoo.com; comments@firozmahbo obkamal.com
From: bd_mailer@yahoo. com
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 03:40:48 -0700
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Licensed to terror – Bangladesh style

Licensed to terror – Bangladesh style

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury
Remember the James Bond 007 movie named Licensed to Kill? In Bangladesh, a small country within South Asian region, right after installation of an elected government through December 29, 2008 general election, partisan hoodlums and terrorists are allowed to continue various forms of notoriety and crime being tolerated by the influential figures in the government and being silently watched by the members of the law enforcing agencies.

It is already over one month when my newspaper office was attacked by a gang of armed thugs belonging to ruling party, Bangladesh Awami League as well as a member from the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence. The attackers enjoyed blessings from one Shintu, proclaiming to be the advisor to Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Earlier, this Shintu called my office and demanded TK. 500,000 [equivalent to US$ 9200] as extortion. He in a harsh voice told me that the amount was required for organizational purpose of the ruling party. It was later learnt that this man continues to use the name of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and a number of top figures in the government, in continuing various forms of illegal activities. Activities of this man is within the knowledge of the ruling party leaders, but, he is allowed in continuing such activities as it has become a regular culture in Bangladesh for some musclemen and thugs to do whatever they wish when their party is in power.

In most of the democratic countries, while leaders concentrate in their party activists and supporters to be aware of core value of democracy as well as democratic behavior, in Bangladesh, politicians teach anarchism, terror, corruption and every form of bad actions.

Each year, vehicles worth millions of dollars are torched by the political demonstrators on the streets of Bangladesh. Such destruction even continues on public and private properties. And, of course, instead of feeling guilty for such crime, politicians feel delighted. They claim such acts to be their democratic right.

In October 2006, thousands of activists of Awami League came on streets in Dhaka in particular with bamboo sticks, hockey-sticks, knives and other lethal weapons at the call of their leader [now Prime Minister] Sheikh Hasina to kill people on the streets, during broad-day-light, in the name of political demonstration. Controversial Awami League leaders like Jahangir Kabir Nanak, Mirza Azam, Bahauddin Nasim etc., were leading such extreme notoriety.

And since Awami League came in power through December 29, 2008 general election, its student wing, youth front etc turned extremely enthusiastic in establishing reign of terror in all the educational institutions, while free-style crime continue in various parts of the country by these activists and members of the ruling party. Members of law enforcing agencies are rather captive in the hands of ruling party thugs and activists. Home Minister Sahara Khatun truly said on March 20, 2009 that country´s law and order situation was in the worst ever form since the independence of Bangladesh.

While the ruling government lately realized that they have virtually no control over their student wing, youth front, volunteer front etc, they have quickly adopted a very nasty policy of shifting the country to the status of a dangerous place in the world with severe threat of Islamist militancy attacks. Presidential Palace, Prime Minister´s office and home, Parliament House, broadcasting establishments, power stations, water supply centers and even English medium and Missionary educational institutions in the country are now under ´Red Alert´. According to information, ´Orange Alert´ has been declared in all the cantonments in the country. Everywhere is a fear of militant attack.

Police in Bangladesh have stepped up security at English-language schools in the capital amid fears of Islamic militant´s attacks. The measures came nearly a month after a mutiny at a military headquarters in Dhaka, in which thousands of rank-and-file border guards were accused of killing more than 70 people, mainly senior army officers. The government has said Islamic militants are linked to the mutiny. The government also said that Islamist militants have penetrated deep inside country´s law enforcing and disciplined forces.

There is also another comment by the government of link between local militants and Talibans. It is quite natural to believe, especially after the government´s comments that, notorious terror groups like Al Qaida might have already found certain place in Bangladesh with those Islamist militancy groups.

It may be mentioned here that, more than 100,000 students are attending English medium and missionary educational institutions in Bangladesh. On the other hand, there are above 69,000 Madrassas with additional number of kindergarten and kindergarten cadet Madrassas in the country. Experts consider Madrassas as breeding ground of Jihadists. It is also learnt that more than 300,000 students come out of various types of Madrassas in Bangladesh, most of whom are brain-washed with religious hatred, Jihadists mentality and high aspiration of becoming ´martyr´ in any religious war. Teachers in religious schools allure young students towards martyrdom with heaven, 72-virgins and many more eternal gifts.

Students in Madrassas learn to hate Jews, Christians, Hindus and other non-Muslims, considering them to be perverted from real religion. They [the students] believe killing Jews and Christians are their noble task right from Allah. They consider Bible, Torah and other Holy Scriptures, except Koran as false and man-written.

And, 300,000 plus students with such dangerous notions in mind, come out of Madrassas every year in Bangladesh, thus turning country´s security in potential threat.

But, what the ruling government is continuing to forecast since February 25-26, 2009 Massacre in Dhaka, has nothing to do with combating such rise of Militancy. Rather, it is simply a part of their political falsehood in saving a large number of ruling party-men, who are directly or indirectly involved behind the BDR Massacre.

Moreover, it is also important to remember here that, Awami League signed a treaty with Islamist party named Khelafat Majlish in 2006 for introducing Shariah Law in the country. One of the major partners in the coalition government in Bangladesh has electoral mandate of enacting Blasphemy law in the country.

A large number of non-governmental organizations in Bangladesh are reportedly engaged in terror financing. Intelligence reports recommended banning the Kuwait-based Revival of Islamic Heritage Society [RIHS] and taking action against a number of other Middle Eastern organizations found to have links with Islamist extremists.

In 2002, the US Department of State blacklisted some RIHS offices, citing their support to Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida. Intelligence agencies had also reported that militant group Ahle Hadith Andolon Bangladesh [AHAB] also receives such funding. AHAB chief Asadullah Al Galib himself talked about receiving funds. Other suspect NGOs include Rabita Al-Alam Al-Islami, Al-Muntada Al-Islami, Society of Social Reforms, Qatar Charitable Society, Islamic Relief Agency, Al-Forkan Foundation, International Relief Organization, Kuwait Joint Relief Committee, Muslim Aid Bangladesh, Dar Al-Khair, Hayatul Igachha and Tawheed-e-Noor.

Now, in Bangladesh, terrorism may even get stronger dimension when Islamists are aligned with Leftists and some of the heavyweight in the ruling party are continuing to patronize such notoriety. Mofazzal Hossain Chowdhury Maya, Haji Selim, Haji Mockbull, Shamim Osman, Joynal Hazari, Dipu Chowdhury, Akhtaruzzaman Chowdhury Babu, Jahangir Kabir Nanak, Mirza Azam, Amir Hossain Amu etc, belonging to the ruling party are known terrorists or terror god-fathers. According to facts, hidden links amongst these elements are already established, who are continuing conspiracies in defaming Bangladesh Armed Forces as many of the kingpins of terror are greatly unhappy with Bangladesh Army for their anti-corruption and anti-terror drives especially since January 11, 2007.

Now going back to the titled topic! Thugs belonging to the ruling party attacked the office of my newspaper one plus month back. Surprisingly, there is no action from the law enforcing agencies or intelligence agencies in the country. We were categorically told by police that it was not possible for them to take any action against those thugs, as because; they [the thugs] belong to the ruling party.

On the other hand, the previous government withdrew police protection from my residence.. Being the only journalist in Bangladesh, facing sedition, treason and blasphemy charges for criticizing radical and militant Islam, there is potential risk on my life from the possible attack by the Islamist militants. And, now, the government officially endorsed the fact of threat from the militants, but they are reluctant in reinstating police protection at my house. Reason behind is very simple; none of the major political parties in Bangladesh are against Islamists. In many cases, such elements are close-aides of the politicians. And, under such extreme adversity, what justice I can ever expect from the present rulers in Dhaka on the case of attack on my office and me on February 22, 2009? What justice I can ever expect in the continuing case of sedition, treason and blasphemy, which is hanging on my shoulder for past six years?
 






__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Quiet Revolution Grows in the Muslim World

Quiet Revolution Grows in the Muslim World
 
 
Three decades after Iran's upheaval established Islamic clerical rule for the first time in 14 centuries, a quieter and more profound revolution is transforming the Muslim world. Dalia Ziada is a part of it.
 
When Ziada was 8, her mother told her to don a white party dress for a surprise celebration. It turned out to be a painful circumcision. But Ziada decided to fight back. The young Egyptian spent years arguing with her father and uncles against the genital mutilation of her sister and cousins, a campaign she eventually developed into a wider movement. She now champions everything from freedom of speech to women's rights and political prisoners. To promote civil disobedience, Ziada last year translated into Arabic a comic-book history about Martin Luther King Jr. and distributed 2,000 copies from Morocco to Yemen. (See pictures of Islam's revolution.)
 
Now 26, Ziada organized Cairo's first human-rights film festival in November. The censorship board did not approve the films, so Ziada doorstopped its chairman at the elevator and rode up with him to plead her case. When the theater was suspiciously closed at the last minute, she rented a tourist boat on the Nile for opening night--waiting until it was offshore and beyond the arm of the law to start the movie.
 
Ziada shies away from little, including the grisly intimate details of her life. But she also wears a veil, a sign that her religious faith remains undimmed. "My ultimate interest," she wrote in her first blog entry, "is to please Allah with all I am doing in my own life."
 
That sentiment is echoed around the Muslim world. In many of the scores of countries that are predominantly Muslim, the latest generation of activists is redefining society in novel ways. This new soft revolution is distinct from three earlier waves of change--the Islamic revival of the 1970s, the rise of extremism in the 1980s and the growth of Muslim political parties in the 1990s.
 
Today's revolution is more vibrantly Islamic than ever. Yet it is also decidedly antijihadist and ambivalent about Islamist political parties. Culturally, it is deeply conservative, but its goal is to adapt to the 21st century. Politically, it rejects secularism and Westernization but craves changes compatible with modern global trends. The soft revolution is more about groping for identity and direction than expressing piety. The new revolutionaries are synthesizing Koranic values with the ways of life spawned by the Internet, satellite television and Facebook. For them, Islam, you might say, is the path to change rather than the goal itself. "It's a nonviolent revolution trying to mix modernity and religion," Ziada says, honking as she makes her way through Cairo's horrendous traffic for a meeting of one of the rights groups she works with.
 
The new Muslim activists, who take on diverse causes from one country to another, have emerged in reaction to the Sept. 11 attacks and all that has happened since. Navtej Dhillon, director of the Brookings Institution's Middle East Youth Initiative, says, "There's a generation between the ages of 15 and 35 driving this soft revolution--like the baby boomers in the U.S.--who are defined by a common experience. It should have been a generation outward looking in a positive way, with more education, access to technology and aspirations for economic mobility." Instead, he says, "it's become hostage to post-9/11 politics." Disillusioned with extremists who can destroy but who fail to construct alternatives that improve daily life, members of the post-9/11 generation are increasingly relying on Islamic values rather than on a religion-based ideology to advance their aims. And importantly, the soft revolution has generated a new self-confidence among Muslims and a sense that the answers to their problems lie within their own faith and community rather than in the outside world. The revolution is about reform in a conservative package...
 
Text-Messaging The Koran
The soft revolution is made concrete in hundreds of new schools from Turkey to Pakistan. Its themes echo in Palestinian hip-hop, Egyptian Facebook pages and the flurry of Koranic verses text-messaged between students. It is reflected in Bosnian streets honoring Muslim heroes and central Asian girls named after the holy city of Medina. Its role models are portrayed by action figures, each with one of the 99 attributes of God, in Kuwaiti comic books. It has even changed slang. Young Egyptians often now answer the telephone by saying "Salaam alaikum"--"Peace be upon you"--instead of "Hello." Many add the tagline "bi izn Allah"--"if God permits"--when discussing everything from the weather to politics. "They think they're getting a bonus with God," muses Ziada.
 
Even in Saudi Arabia, the most rigid Muslim state, the soft revolution is transforming public discourse. Consider Ahmad al-Shugairi, who worked in his family business until a friend recruited him in 2002 for a television program called Yallah Shabab (Hey, Young People). Al-Shugairi ended up as the host. Although he never had formal religious training, al-Shugairi quickly became one of the most popular TV preachers, broadcast by satellite to an audience across the Middle East and watched on YouTube. "The show explained that you could be a good Muslim and yet enjoy life," says Kaswara al-Khatib, a former producer of Yallah Shabab. "It used to be that you could be either devout or liberal, with no middle ground. The focus had been only on God's punishment. We focused on God's mercy."
 
In 2005, al-Shugairi began a TV series called Thoughts during the holy month of Ramadan, focusing on the practical problems of contemporary Muslim life, from cleanliness to charity. Sometimes clad in jeans and at other times a white Saudi robe and headdress, he often speaks informally from a couch. "I'm not reinventing the wheel or the faith," al-Shugairi explains in Jidda's Andalus Café, which he opened for the young. "But there is a need for someone to talk common sense." (See pictures of Ramadan.)
 
Al-Shugairi's own life mirrors the experimentation and evolution of many young Muslims. In the 1990s, he says, he bounced from "extreme pleasure" as a college student in California to "extreme belief." The shock of Sept. 11, an attack whose perpetrators were mostly Saudi, steered him to the middle.
 
Traditional clerics deride al-Shugairi, 35, and other televangelists for preaching "easy Islam," "yuppie Islam," even "Western Islam." But his message actually reflects a deepening conservatism in the Islamic world, even as activists use contemporary examples and modern technology to make their case. One of al-Shugairi's programs on happiness focused on Elvis Presley, a man with fame, talent and fortune but who died young. Life without deep spirituality, al-Shugairi preaches, is empty.
 
The soft revolution's voices are widening the Islamic political spectrum. Mostafa Nagar, 28, an Egyptian dentist, runs a blog called Waves in the Sea of Change, which is part of an Internet-based call for a renaissance in Islamic thinking. Yet Nagar belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood, the largest Islamist movement in the Middle East. His blog launched a wave of challenges from within the Brotherhood to its proposed manifesto, which limits the political rights of women and Christians. Nagar called for dividing the religious and political wings of the movement, a nod to the separation of mosque and state, and pressed the party to run technocrats rather than clerics for positions of party leadership and public office.
 
When Nagar and his colleagues were urged to leave the Brotherhood, they decided to stay. "As a public party," he says, "its decisions are relevant to the destiny of all Egyptians, so their thoughts should be open to all people." And indeed, his blog--and other criticism from the movement's youth wing--has caused the manifesto to be put on ice.
 
The flap underscores an emerging political trend. Since 9/11, polls have consistently shown that most Muslims do not want either an Iranian-style theocracy or a Western-style democracy. They want a blend, with clerics playing an advisory role in societies, not ruling them. As a consequence, Islamist parties are now under intense scrutiny. "Islamists, far from winning sweeping victories, are struggling to maintain even the modest gains they made earlier," says a recent survey by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. In Iraq's recent elections, for example, secular parties solidly trumped the religious parties that had fared well four years ago.
 
Rethinking Tradition
Politics is not the only focus of the soft revolution. Its most fundamental impact, indeed, may be on the faith itself. In the shadows of Kocatepe Mosque in Ankara, Turkey, a team of 80 Turkish scholars has been meeting for the past three years to ponder Muslim traditions dating back 14 centuries. Known as the hadith, the traditions are based on the actions and sayings of the Prophet Muhammad and dictate behavior on everything from the conduct of war to personal hygiene. (
See pictures of Iranians.)
 
Later this year, the Turkish scholars are expected to publish six volumes that reject thousands of Islam's most controversial practices, from stoning adulterers to honor killings. Some hadith, the scholars contend, are unsubstantiated; others were just invented to manipulate society. "There is one tradition which says ladies are religiously and rationally not complete and of lesser mind," says Ismail Hakki Unal of Ankara University's divinity school, a member of the commission. "We think this does not conform with the soul of the Koran. And when we look at the Prophet's behavior toward ladies, we don't think those insulting messages belong to him." Another hadith insists that women be obedient to their husbands if they are to enter paradise. "Again, this is incompatible with the Prophet," Unal says. "We think these are sentences put forth by men who were trying to impose their power over the ladies."
 
The Hadith Project is only one of many such investigations into Islam's role in the 21st century. This is perhaps the most intellectually active period for the faith since the height of Islamic scholarship in the Middle Ages. "There is more self-confidence in the Islamic world about dealing with reason, constitutionalism, science and other big issues that define modern society," says Ibrahim Kalin of the Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research in Ankara. "The West is no longer the only worldview to look up to. There are other ways of sharing the world and negotiating your place in it."
 
Crucially, this latest wave of Islamic thought is not led only by men. Eman el-Marsafy is challenging one of the strictest male domains in the Muslim world--the mosque. For 14 centuries, women have largely been relegated to small side rooms for prayer and excluded from leadership. But el-Marsafy is one of hundreds of professional women who are memorizing the Koran and is even teaching at Cairo's al-Sadiq Mosque. "We're taking Islam to the new world," el-Marsafy says. "We can do everything everyone else does. We want to move forward too."
 
The young are in the vanguard. A graduate in business administration and a former banker, el-Marsafy donned the hijab when she was 26, despite fierce objections from her parents. (Her father was an Egyptian diplomat, her mother a society figure.) But last year, el-Marsafy's mother, now in her 60s, began wearing the veil too. That is a common story. Forty years ago, Islamic dress was rare in Egypt... Today, more than 80% of women are estimated to wear the hijab, and many put it on only after their daughters did.
 
Piety alone is not the explanation for the change in dress. "The veil is the mask of Egyptian woman in a power struggle against the dictatorship of men," says Nabil Abdel Fattah of Cairo's al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies and author of The Politics of Religion. "The veil gives women more power in a man's world." Ziada, the human-rights activist, says the hijab--her headscarves are in pinks, pastels, floral prints and plaids, not drab black--provides protective cover and legitimacy for her campaigns.
 
Waiting for Obama
The ferment in the Muslim world has a range of implications for President Barack Obama's outreach to Islam. Gallup polls in Islamic societies show that large majorities both reject militants and have serious reservations about the West. "They're saying, 'There's a plague on both your houses,'" says Richard Burkholder Jr., director of Gallup's international polls. Many young Muslims are angry at the outside world's support of corrupt and autocratic regimes despite pledges to push for democracy after 9/11. "Most of the young feel the West betrayed its promises," says Dhillon, of the Brookings Institution. Muslims fume that a few perpetrators of violence have led the outside world to suspect a whole generation of supporting terrorism. "The only source of identity they have is being attacked," Dhillon says. The post-9/11 generation has been further shaped by wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon and Gaza, all of which Washington played a direct or indirect role in.
 
Although he is the first U.S. President to have lived in the Muslim world and to have Muslim relatives and a Muslim middle name, Obama is likely to face skepticism even among those who welcomed his election. In an open letter on the day of his Inauguration, the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference appealed for a "new partnership" with the Obama Administration. "Throughout the globe, Muslims hunger for a new era of peace, concordance and tranquility," wrote Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, secretary-general of the conference. He then pointedly added, "We firmly believe that America, with your guidance, can help foster that peace, though real peace can only be shared--never imposed." (See pictures of Muslims in America.)
 
That is the key. Gallup polls show that by huge margins, Muslims reject the notion that the U.S. genuinely wants to help them. The new Administration, with a fresh eye on the world, wants to bolster the position of the U.S. But "Obama will have a narrow window to act," says Burkholder, "because the U.S. has failed so often in the past."
 
Ask Naif al-Mutawa, a clinical psychologist from Kuwait. Al-Mutawa is the publisher of The 99, glossy comic books popular from Morocco to Indonesia, with 99 male and female superheroes, each imbued with godly qualities such as mercy, wisdom and tolerance. In a recent article for the Chicago Tribune, Obama's hometown paper, al-Mutawa recounted a conversation with his father about his newborn son. Al-Mutawa's grandfather had recently died, and he expected his father to ask him to keep the name in the family. Instead, his father suggested the child be named after Obama. "I was stunned," al-Mutawa wrote. "Instead of asking me to hold on to the past, my conservative Arab Muslim father was asking me to make a bet on the future."
 
But al-Mutawa opted against it. "I want to see results, not just hope, before naming my children after a leader," he wrote. Such pragmatism is typical of the Muslim world's soft revolutionaries. They believe that their own governments, the Islamist extremists and the outside world alike have all failed to provide a satisfying narrative that synthesizes Islam and modernity. So they are taking on the task themselves. The soft revolution's combination of conservative symbols, like Islamic dress, with contemporary practices, like blogging, may confuse outsiders. But there are few social movements in the world today that are more important to understand.
 
Wright's most recent book is Dreams and Shadows: The Future of the Middle East
 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] BDR Mutiny: To assault or not?

BDR Mutiny: To assault or not?
 
Options differ on the merit of an army assault on the Pilkhana mutineers on February 25. The anti-interventionists argue that attacking the armed rebels would have caused considerable casualties amongst the combatants and civilians inside and outside Pilkhana, property damage, riflemen outside Dhaka to mutiny in sympathy, and blood feud between the army and the Bangladesh Rifles.
 
First, on the number of armed mutineers. Although about 5,000 riflemen were present, about 450 or less than 10 per cent appear to have been involved and only about a 100 or so hardcore types active in killing, molesting and looting (newspaper reports).


Second, BDR equipment is basically hand-me-down and discarded army issue. Apart from rifles, the BDR had machine guns and recoilless rifles. These are offensive and defensive weapons. The three-inch mortars are not much use in defence.

Since rebellion is a capital crime, it is interesting that the mutineers did not establish defensive positions in anticipation of an assault, a standard response. Did they get a hint that this was not on the cards?

Contrast this with the response to the BDR mutiny on February 16, 1972 when Bangabandhu used S force to crush the mutiny after talks failed.


In contrast to the anti-authoritarian and/or anti-colonial rationale of mutinies such as the PRC's Yanchang Uprising 1927 and Vietnam's Yen Bai 1930, the BDR mutiny lacked any overarching political or social themes but focused on pecuniary benefits. The riflemen's demands lacked purity and a just cause. Their will to fight and die for their beliefs was absent. This explains why desertions started after the first cowardly killings began about 10:00am or so. Most riflemen wanted benefits, not involvement in murder.

When could the assault have taken place? One answer: almost at the mutiny's outset.

This is based on ex-RAB intelligence chief late Colonel Gulzar Ahmed's request at 9:30am on February 25 to his RAB colleagues to send two platoons (sixty men) as the killers '…don't seem to be organised' (newspaper reports March 16).

As an anti-terrorism veteran, his evaluation can't be ignored. While assault preparations were ongoing, security forces could and should have quarantined Pilkhana, signalling to the mutineers that they were surrounded, escape impossible and they had better negotiate or face the consequences.
Instead TV crews interviewed the mutineers. The authorities sent an odd assortment of intermediaries untrained in mutiny and hostage negotiations to parley. We don't know what they talked but did the authorities' uncoordinated actions embolden the mutineers to believe that officialdom was 'weak' and public sentiment not entirely against them?

As to the actual assault, this could have been made by troops from 46 Brigade and Air Defence Unit, located near the Dhaka cantonment, between 11:00am and 12:00 noon, judged by what the army high command told the prime minister (newspaper reports).

The probability of success of an assault was high, with casualties being in the 'acceptable' rather than 'unacceptable' range. This assessment stems from the mutineers' poor motivation, unwillingness to die, inferior arms and lack of defensive preparations.

These same factors would have prevented riflemen outside Dhaka from rebelling. Even if they had, their scattered location would have meant limited local impact that nearby army units could have contained easily.

There was never any indication that the army would not obey orders. So the chance of sustained fighting or cooperation between the two sets of jawans was remote.

Given what we now know, it's unlikely that the officers' lives could have been saved since most of the killings were over by noon. The question then is whether the assault preparations would have hastened the killings or pre-empted them.

There is no easy answer. But quelling a mutiny inherently involves risks and uncertainty. But good planning and execution would have minimised but not eliminated them, e.g. Entebbe 1976.

Pilkhana's defences comprise nothing more substantial than a high wall. The Pakistanis on March 25, 1971 using jeep-mounted 106 mm recoilless rifles easily breached it with few civilian deaths.

The assault debate is a legitimate one. Equally legitimate is one about the process and quality of official decision making to tackle the mutiny. Was it proper for top officials to parley with the mutineers, announce amnesty and give indirect assurances about meeting their demands?

This chain of events, contrary to conventional practice in dealing with mutiny and hostages, gives the impression rightly or wrongly that the authorities were more concerned with the mutineers' grievances than the hostages' fate.

The combination of mutiny, massacre and quality of response has hurt national security. Repairing it will be hard. The reports of the Anis and army committees hopefully will be a first step in healing.

http://www.newagebd.com/2009/mar/24/oped.html#1



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [ALOCHONA] Nuclear Bangladesh: neither safe nor affordable

Russia submits proposal to Bangladesh on setting up nuclear power plant

Russian Ambassador to Bangladesh Gennady P Trotsenko on Sunday submitted a formal proposal to Bangladesh's State Minister for Science and ICT Yeafesh Osman for setting up a nuclear power plant to meet the country's growing demand for energy, private news agency UNB reported.

Talking to reporters here Sunday after meeting with the state minister, the ambassador was quoted as saying Russia is making endeavors to assist Bangladesh to construct a nuclear plant to meet the energy needs in the south Asian country.

He said a Russian team of experts would soon come here to discuss this issue with the concerned authorities.

The state minister told reporters that they would study the proposal and hold further discussions on it with the Russian expert team.

Earlier, reports said Russia has proposed backing for a 1,000-megawatt nuclear power station in Bangladesh.

Bangladesh has a shortage of electricity with generation of around 3,500 MW against the demand of 5,000 MW.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Isha Khan"
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Nuclear Bangladesh: neither safe nor affordable
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:36:33 -0700 (PDT)

 
That for Bangladesh, coal is not feasible is obvious but nuclear power can't become feasible simply by default. Nor is it going to be a solution in the next decade or so, writes Afsan Chowdhury


PRIME minister Sheikh Hasina recently announced that Bangladesh should go nuclear to meet its power need. This has been followed by a recent interview of CS Karim, ex-chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, where he advocated nuclear power on its own and also in comparison to coal power.. This is unfortunately a scary development. The nuclear lobby is taking advantage of the need for greater energy and the concern over the high carbon emission of traditional fossil fuel sources to push its product. However, even as people are fazed by the lack of immediately available power options, there is increasing evidence that nuclear power is unsafe, far too expensive, extremely difficult to build and maintain, has enormous cost overruns and ignores the much higher potential of other alternative sources which are also infinitely cheaper to install.
   
   Power shortage and nuclear power
   SHEIKH Hasina told parliament in early March that her government would set up a nuclear power plant to meet the country's growing energy demand.
   'We are taking initiatives to set up a nuclear power plant at Rooppur site,' Sheikh Hasina declared.
   Agency reports say that, according to a proposal prepared by the government, a 600-megawatt nuclear power plant will be constructed at Rooppur located in the country's western region.
   The UN atomic watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency has already approved a technical assistance project for Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant to be initiated between 2009 and 2011.
   Currently, the country is facing power shortage of nearly 2,000MW.
   Sheikh Hasina's government has a plan to increase power generation from 3,500MW to 7,000MW in the next five years.
   Bangladesh has been suffering from energy and power shortage for many years. It's also the most lucrative and corrupt sector. Despite efforts of the politicians, bureaucrats and technocrats, the situation has been in the dumps for decades. Nobody knows why the situation doesn't improve but it says volumes about the planning and competence level of the responsible authorities here.
   
   The resurgence of nuclear power
   FOR Sheikh Hasina to think of a nuclear option is understandable but why her advisers haven't pointed out that the nuclear option is neither safe nor affordable is not understood. Obviously, she has confidence in those who are not familiar with the dangers involved.
   After the incident at Chernobyl and the Three-Mile Island, the nuclear lobby took a beating and its stock fell low but the concern about carbon emission has been a great advantage for the nuclear industry which is selling the idea all over the world.
   Ralph Nader, the US's most influential consumer advocate, has been battling nuclear power for over four decades. In his latest article, he says, 'The atomic power corporations are beating on the doors in Washington to make you guarantee their financing for more giant nuclear plants. They are pouring money and applying political muscle to Congress for up to $50 billion in loan guarantees to persuade an uninterested Wall Street that Uncle Sam will pay for any defaults on industry construction loans.
   'Since 1974, there has not been a filled order for a nuclear power plant. It was just too financially risky, bogged down with delays and cost overruns, with too many spent fuel rods filling pools at the plants because no permanent storage sites for deadly radioactive wastes had been certified. Big time financing also dried up. Finally, risks of sabotage and nuclear proliferation became prominent national security problems in the post-9/11 era.'
   What saved the nuclear industry was global concern about carbon emissions and the public desire to desperately find an alternative to fossil fuels. In fact in the US as well as in Europe, coal power has been tarnished beyond repair. The carbon industry which provides 50 per cent of US electricity is known as 'dirty coal'. So the industry has been propagating 'clean coal' which means that the emission that is going to occur is going to be trapped under a method called 'carbon sequestration'.
   When challenged the pro-coal lobby scientists have however admitted that such a method is barely in the planning stage and no one knows when it will be ready and if at all it will be successful. So the coal industry has already been 'dinosaured' and what keeps it going is its strategic presence in the US states, excessive dependence built over the years on coal and political sensitivity. However, Obama has said only 'clean coal' will be acceptable so even discussing the coal as an option to anything makes no sense. It's not an alternative to any form of power generation in today's world.
   
   The nuclear disaster factor
   THE nuclear power lobby has been arguing that it's much safer now and of course it's clean. And safety is not an issue because existing generators are so much better than the Chernobyl and TMI example. This is now being challenged in the public domain by scientists and activists everywhere.
   But let's say Bangladesh doesn't have a safety issue. Let's say it doesn't matter if millions die from a nuclear disaster because millions die or half die anyway. One is reminded of former US president Richard Nixon who was a great proponent of nuclear power and who said he lived near a nuclear plant and he had no problem till it was pointed out that the same reactor had been shut down several times due to flaws and poor Nixon's smile vanished rather rapidly.
   Of course people expect at least a Chernobyl to qualify as a 'disaster' forgetting small nuclear disasters are constantly happening. Chernobyl was a mega disaster and a major factor in not only destroying lives and devastating land and people near and far for over many generations but it's the push which ended Soviet Union also. Infinitely lesser disasters can cripple Bangladesh. And Bangladesh will not survive a Chernobyl at all with its tiny land mass. In fact, it will not survive a much smaller disaster either.
   The other issues of safety relate to constant release of radiation and disposal of radioactive waste. Recent study shows that in many countries where nuclear plants are running show slow but constant radiation especially of drinking water sources. A recent controversy has been in Canada where radioactive tritium has been released into the Ottawa river and the authorities claimed it was 'safe' and controlled. Challenging this assertion of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Professor Gordon Edwards of Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility wrote, 'Much scientific evidence has existed for many decades on this subject. The overwhelming consensus is that there is no such thing as a "safe dose" of exposure to ionising radiation – or, for that matter, to any other carcinogen. The US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) examined claims from the nuclear industry and its proponents that there might be a "safe threshold" of radiation exposure, and rejected those claims as having no scientific validity.'
   It appears that the notion of safety according to nuclear technocrats and bureaucrats often is at odds with the position held by the general scientific community. And they do often mislead as the case above shows.
   Meanwhile, disposal of nuclear waste is a critical and very expensive problem even for the US and other western powers and Bangladesh has no extra land to dispose of such waste in some barren landscape or ship it elsewhere either. To gloss over such critical facts is dangerous and irresponsible.
   
   The cost and time issue
   THAT for Bangladesh, coal is not feasible is obvious but nuclear power can't become feasible simply by default. Nor is it going to be a solution in the next decade or so. CS Karim says in his interview that it will take 60 months from pouring of concrete to generation plus a year for contract finalisation. The cost mentioned is $1.2 billion. The two figures if unpacked show the absurdity of the vision. No nuclear plant has ever been built on time and in Bangladesh no plant has ever been signed and executed within a reasonable delay. How long this delay will take is anyone's guess. And the $1.2 billion spent on such an uncertain sector as nuclear power is an extremely scary thought.
   The average nuclear power station is four years behind schedule and runs three times over budget, latest reports say.
   Steve Thomas, professor of energy policy at Greenwich University, has said: 'The nuclear industry has always made unfulfilled promises; history reveals a damning testament to its failure. Pursuing a new programme of nuclear reactors would deny us the opportunity to make the necessary investment in renewable technologies and energy efficiency to meet future energy needs in a viable and sustainable way.'
   A review of nuclear construction in the US shows that 75 reactors were predicted to cost $45bn but the actual cost was closer to $145bn. More recently, in India, completion costs for the last ten reactors have been 300 per cent over budget.
   The World Energy Council report states that construction times for the industry were rising from 66 months in the mid-1970s to 116 months – nearly ten years – for completions between 1995 and 2000. It is longer now.
   A new group of 'generation three' reactors proposed for Europe and elsewhere are unproven, leading to more potential delays.
   It means that the chances of six years becoming ten years to build a Bangladesh reactor are almost certain and $1.2 billion becoming $2.1 billion even more so. And if this is happening in the more advanced countries, the chances of this happening in Bangladesh are even more certain.
   
   What about other options?
   WHY the prime minister and her advisers didn't go for other options is a mystery. There is no shortage of options including solar, wind, wave and other sources and many Bangladeshi scientists are working all over the world in this sector. Unlike the nuclear which is an unproven sector, several European powers including Germany have shown themselves to be remarkably successful at alternative renewable sources of energy utilisation.
   Part of this one supposes is the power of the nuclear lobby globally including its clout at the UN level where it's supported by the traditional school of scientists who don't see the renewable options as not being 'scientific' enough. However, the evidence that renewable sources are doing better is overwhelming.
   Sheikh Hasina shouldn't commit herself to nuclear power before conducting a non-partisan review. It matters little what other international bodies say because the said bodies are by description pro-nuclear. An independent review by scientists who are not committed to nuclear power should look at the options before Bangladesh commits itself to a disaster from which there is no return.

http://www.newagebd.com/2009/mar/23/edit.html


 


--
Be Yourself @ mail.com!
Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
Get a Free Account at www.mail.com!


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Dahuk/Alochona: Moderated by intolerant Wahabi fascist

Mr. Shamim
 
Since Moderators of Alochona does not post any of my articles, why should I be calling them Islamic fascist or wahabi fascist? What Islam has to do with their reasonings not to publish my write-ups? Or What role does play on Alochona's moderators mind of the inpretation of Wahabi in deciding not to publish my articles? I just can't grasp it as to why should I be calling them as such terms that you are accustomed of.
 
As Islam does not have any compulsion whatsoever on the matters of opinions or any actions/deeds of others, so why should they be termed as Islamic fascist?
 
If they would understood Islam, then, I think, Alochona would have approved my messages as well as Dahuk. Wrongly labeling or name calling of others does reflect lack of knowledge of yours and that's should be rephrehensible. And it is a misdirection of your anger toward them.
 
We should protest against the craven attitude of our Bangladeshi forums' moderators with the dignified language that describe them the best.
 
Would you mind in explaining as to why do you use those terms to describe their actions/deeds? And I m waiting to hear from you soon of what sorts of logic that would best describe your anger to label them as Islamic fascists or Wahabi fascists?

Thank you.
Firoz Alam

--- In khabor@yahoogroups.com, Shamim Chowdhury <veirsmill@...> wrote:
Intolerant Wahabi Islamic fascist sect moderates Dahuk yahoo group. As a rule, they will not post any dissenting views-comments, if not certified by ultra orthodox wahabisam. When they do post dissenting view moderator himself/herself will twist it so much that originality of the posters views will be lost.
 
This attitude of not giving a chance to dissenting view is common among Washabist but without a doubt, this is very sad.
Thanks
Shamim Chowdhury
Maryland, USA



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___