Banner Advertiser

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

[ALOCHONA] More Evidence of US War Crimes



More Evidence of US War Crimes



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] China builds massive dams



A new era for Tibet's rivers

Jiang Yannan
He Haining

January 17, 2011

Thumb

"The backer of the Zangmu project has already built a residential area alongside the river and a flourishing town is taking shape."

The rushing waters of the Yarlung Zangbo, the last of China's great rivers to remain undammed, will soon be history. On November 12 last year, the builders of the Zangmu Hydropower Station announced the successful damming of the river – the first public announcement on a matter that, until now, has been kept under wraps.

The Zangmu hydroelectric power station is being built on the middle reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo (known as the Brahmaputra when it reaches India) between the counties of Sangri and Gyaca. Around 7.9 billion yuan (US$1.2 billion) is being invested in the project, located in a V-shaped valley 3,200 metres above sea level. At 510 megawatts, the plant is much smaller than China's 18,000-megawatt Three Gorges Dam, but still equivalent to the entire existing hydropower-generating capacity of Tibet.

The construction workers have now reached the centre of the river. The water is being diverted into sluiceways and rows of grouting machines and stone crushers are working at full pace, while trucks come and go. One worker said that the winter here is mild, so there'll be no need to stop work. Geologist Yang Yong said the activity represents the start of a new age: "Hydropower development on the Yarlung has begun, marking the start of a hydropower era for Tibet's rivers."

A series of hydropower stations is proposed for the Yarlung Zangbo. If they are all built, Zangmu will be the fourth in a row of five on the Sangri to Gyaca stretch of the river, between the Gyaca and Jiexu plants. There has been no official confirmation that the construction of these will go ahead. But Yan Zhiyong, general manager of China Hydropower Engineering Consulting, said in a recent media interview: "By about 2020 most of China's hydropower projects outside of Tibet will have been completed, and the industry's focus will shift to the Jinsha, Lancang, the upper reaches of the Nu River and the Yarlung."

Several well-known Chinese hydropower firms have already made their way into Tibet. The backer of the Zangmu project, the Tibet Generating Company, has already built a residential area on the open spaces alongside the river at Zangmu and a flourishing town is taking shape, with a supermarket better-stocked than those in the county's main town. The boss, from Zhejiang, moved here from the Xiaowan dam in Yunnan, south-west China, two months ago and is positive about the future: "There'll be loads of workers next year, business will be great."

The Zangmu dam is located in the southern Tibetan county of Gyaca, which has a population of around 17,000. "The economy here is going to be among the fastest-growing in Tibet," said businessman Li Hua, who has already invested in a three-star hotel here – a five-storey building that is now the tallest in the area.

Work on a highway to the administrative centre of Lhoka prefecture is to start in 2011, cutting travel time in half. "Hydropower development will very quickly spur mining, and there'll also be very rapid growth in road and railways. The Tibetan hinterland will see a new development boom," predicted Yang Yong.

Guan Zhihua is a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research. In 1972 the academy established a survey team to study the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, and Guan – now in his seventies – was the head of the group charged with calculating the hydropower potential of the Yarlung Zangbo, China's highest river. As if describing a family heirloom, he said: "The river flows for 2,057 kilometres within China's borders, and its hydropower potential is second only to the Yangtze. It has more power-generating potential per unit of length than any other river in China."

Guan's was the first comprehensive and systematic study of the plateau – a four year field project carried out by more than 400 people across 50 different disciplines. But the study of the Yarlung Zangbo and its tributaries was only a part of the survey, and at the time nobody had any idea of the extent of the river's potential. The entire basin was found to have hydropower potential of 114 gigawatts – 79 of which was on the main river. And this potential was highly concentrated, with the possibility of a 38-gigawatt hydropower facility at the Great Bend in Medog county, equal in power to the Three Gorges Dam.

In 1980, a nationwide survey of hydropower resources was carried out and 12 possible dam locations identified on the Yarlung Zangbo. "This would have been the first hydropower plan for the Yarlung," recalled Guan.

In the 1980s, Tibet twice planned to dam the Yarlung Zangbo, but in neither case did the project get off the ground

Zhang Jinling, a 76-year old retiree from the Tibet Surveying Institute, recalled the first bid to build a dam here: "In the 1980s, Shigatse [a city in southern Tibet] wanted to build a hydropower station at Jiangdang and that would have been the first attempt to dam the river." But there were concerns: this part of the river carries a lot of silt and the project would have required swaths of land to be inundated and many people to be relocated – and the dam would only generate 50 megawatts of power. The plan was submitted to Beijing, but was not approved.

On another occasion, plans were drawn up to dam the river outside Lhasa. Zhang's team carried out preliminary surveys, drilling rock samples out of the mountainsides to acquire geological data. But a large reshuffle of officials in both 1981 and 1982 saw the team lose two-thirds of its manpower. Plans were shelved.

Those plans were spurred by a shortage of electricity in Tibet. Zhang recalled that the Tibetan government was seeking a quick way of providing power by any means – diesel-fired and geothermal power generation were also used.

During the 1980s, Lhasa, with 120,000 residents, only had 20 or 30 megawatts of power-generating capacity, mostly provided by several hydropower stations each providing a few megawatts. In winter there was no choice but to rotate power supplies to different areas of the city, with those cut off using kerosene for heating.

When Zhang retired in 1995, the electricity grid in eastern Tibet was just beginning to take shape, but it has remained isolated from the national grid. A connection between Tibet and Qinghai is due to be completed in 2012, which will relieve the electricity shortages Tibet suffers in winter and spring.

"It wouldn't have been possible to build a large dam on the Yarlung before the Qinghai-Tibet railway was completed – you need a rail line to move the building materials," said He Xiwu, who was head of the survey team's water-resources group at the time.

In 1994, work started on the Three Gorges Dam, but plans for the Yarlung Zangbo were kept quiet. The low-key approach was unusual given the river's huge potential. Even recently, a water-resources official with the Tibetan government stressed that developing hydropower in Tibet was mostly about self-sufficiency.

Since the early 1990s, Tibet has built a series of medium-sized hydropower stations, of about 10 megawatts each, such as the pumped-storage hydropower station at Yamdrok Lake and the dam at Zhikong. These are intended to relieve electricity shortages in the Lhasa area.

Although government work reports mention it every year, hydropower development on the Yarlung Zangbo was never made a priority. But in the final years of the 11th Five Year Plan, things changed. "The current proposal is an appropriate degree of industrialisation, with a process of capacity building, then focusing on priorities, and then overall development," said He Gang, research fellow at the Tibet Academy of Social Sciences' Institute of Economic Strategy. "The priorities most often proposed are mining and hydropower."

Behind the scenes, preparations for hydropower development on the Yarlung Zangbo have been constant. In a recent media interview, Zhi Xiaoqian, head of the Chengdu Surveying Institute, said that plans had been drawn up for all of Tibet's major rivers, including the middle reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo. But a lack of clear policy direction has meant approval for those plans has been slow and the projects have not commenced. "Now the time and conditions are ripe. China's energy supply is becoming ever more pressured, and there's an urgent need to develop the rich hydropower resources of Tibet," Zhi said.

Currently less than 0.6% of Tibet's hydropower resources have been developed. In comparison with the rest of China, this is virgin territory.

The Zangmu Hydropower Station is only the start. The huge potential of the Yarlung Zangbo is concentrated at the Great Bend in Medog county, where two or more dams the size of the Three Gorges could be built. This is also the most spectacular section of the river, where it falls steeply as it makes a u-turn, and is regarded as one of the world's most striking river sections.

As early as 1998, Chen Chuanyou of the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research at the Chinese Academy of Sciences published an article in Guangming Daily entitled "Could the world's biggest hydropower station be built in Tibet?" He proposed building a reservoir on the middle reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo to raise the water level, and then drilling a 16-kilometre tunnel to carry the water to its tributary, the Duoxiong – a drop of 2,300 metres that would allow for three hydropower stations. For the sake of safety and the environment, they could be built underground, he said.

In 2002, Chen published another paper in Engineering Sciences, looking at the positive impact that a hydropower station at the Great Bend would have on electricity generation in south-east Asia, and pointing out that, if there were financial issues, funds could be raised both domestically and abroad, and that electricity could be exported to south-east Asia.

He Xiwu said: "I've heard there is still no plan for the Great Bend. The state should spend a bit every year on long-term research. There's 38-gigawatts of potential there, but the geology is complicated and construction would be difficult. It has to be done carefully."

"Hydropower development in Tibet has come late, but it is on the agenda now," said Fan Xiao, chief engineer for the regional geological survey team at the Sichuan Bureau of Geological Exploration. What worries Fan, however, is this: "Tibet's ecology is extremely vulnerable, and would be very hard to restore if damaged. This kind of full-river development can't just see the Yarlung Zangbo as a hydropower resource – everything needs to be taken into consideration."

This article was first published by Southern Weekend.

He Haining is a reporter and Jiang Yannan an intern at Southern Weekend. Feng Jie, also a reporter, contributed to this article. 

http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/4055



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Do not VOTE for BNP if they are not willing to speak for you in parliament



By-Election: Do not VOTE for BNP if they are not willing to join and speak for you in the national parliament

 

What a farce with people's mandate! It is difficult to understand with what right BNP seeks vote for by-election when they have decided not to join the parliament unless it becomes obligatory to retain seats in parliament.

 

In last two years Khaleda Zia Chairperson of BNP attended parliament less then ten days. People should not and will not vote for a party which has made its decision not to join parliament and make our democracy works.

 

When Khaleda Zia lost her illegally occupied house BNP started collecting resignation paper from its parliament member. Now tell me, why a party which is in motion to resign from parliament to protect illegal occupation of its Chairman's of personal property will put candidacy for another seat in the same parliament, this is joke or what?

 

Before any voter vote for BNP candidate in upcoming by-election they should ask BNP candidate whether they will be voting him to go to parliament and speak for them or they will be voting someone knowingly to protect BNP Chairperson's personal property and not go to parliament to protect their right. If the answer is not satisfactory I believe they will not vote for BNP but vote some other candidate who will speak on their behalf in the nation's parliament.

 

 

Shamim Chowdhury

Maryland, U.S.A.




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] 25 January :BKSAL day



25 January :BKSAL day
 
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Manias, Panics and Bangladesh



Manias, Panics and Bangladesh
 
Dhaka's attempt to stanch a bleeding stock market is worsening the wound.
 

Add Bangladesh, January 2011, to the litany of failed government attempts to "stabilize" a falling stock market. The regulator in Dhaka, the Securities and Exchange Commission, has spent the last few months trying to support prices. The predictable result of these efforts has been greater instability and uncertainty for all parties.

Angry investors burned by the mass market selloffs have taken to the streets, most recently in riots last week. And one can hardly blame them, since late last year Dhaka encouraged shareholders to believe that the government would protect them from losses. Instead the carnage has continued. On Jan. 10, the Dhaka stock exchange's index dropped 660 points, or 9%, in an hour.

Bangladesh's stock market started booming in 2009 and rose 80% in 2010, luring even villagers with the promise of making a quick buck. Like other manias, this one had a familiar culprit. Credit was cheap, and with few other avenues of investment open, money flowed into stocks.

Some investors realized last year that the market was overvalued and began to sell, but the SEC had other ideas. To prevent a sharp selloff, the regulator made it cheaper to buy stocks on margin. That worked for a time, but it sowed the seeds of a bigger decline.

That came in December, when the central bank suddenly hiked banks' required reserve ratio in a belated attempt to rein in lending. Encountering higher borrowing costs, companies and investors sold stocks en masse.

That only drove the SEC to more desperate measures. It had to shut down trading four times in 10 days this month, and it closed its exchanges for two whole days. Last Wednesday, it installed circuit breakers to suspend trading if the benchmark index moved more than 225 points. But this worsened the panic; the next day, the market fell 600 points in six minutes. The SEC removed this control yesterday.

Dhaka might have saved itself the trouble by allowing the market to clear and find its natural bottom. As long as the government is artificially supporting prices, those looking for a cheap buy are naturally reluctant to step in. This often causes prices to fall further.

If governments feel compelled to respond to market cycles, their best option is to undertake reforms that help promote future earnings, thus restoring market confidence. Bangladesh's economy has been growing at around 6%, but the government could still disinvest more from state enterprises and increase access to natural resources.

Dhaka could also help stabilize the market by introducing short selling. When investors can bet against a stock, price discovery is more efficient. During a boom, short selling can temper the euphoria. And sudden falls can be softened as the short sellers buy to close out their positions.

But the best way a government can promote a healthy and more stable market is to make clear that it will not socialize the risks of investors. When shareholders know that they alone must take responsibility for their decisions, they are bound to be more prudent about where they direct investment. And that ultimately is what a stock market is supposed to be about.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703555804576102010808560544.html?mod=WSJAsia_hps_MIDDLE_Video_Top



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Bangladesh: Torture and Extra-Judicial Killings



Bangladesh: Torture and Extra-Judicial Killings
 
Despite Promises, No End to Systematic Human Rights Abuses
January 24, 2011

The government should not just keep turning a blind eye to all these killings because they are not fooling anyone with their excuses. Credibility will only come if the government follows the National Human Rights Commission's recommendation to name an impartial panel of inquiry for each killing and to hold those found responsible to account.

Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch

(New York) - The Awami League government has not kept its promise after its election victory in December 2008 to show "zero tolerance" for abuses by its security forces, Human Rights Watch said today in releasing its World Report 2011. Two years on, new extrajudicial killings have been reported, and those responsible have not been brought to justice.

The 649-page World Report 2011, the organization's 21st annual review of human rights practices around the globe, summarizes major human rights trends in more than 90 nations and territories worldwide. Bangladesh should immediately end systematic human rights abuses, including stopping extrajudicial executions and torture by its security forces, Human Rights Watch said in the chapter on Bangladesh. It should allow the media, political opponents, and labor rights activists to exercise their rights to freedom of expression and association fully, Human Rights Watch said.

Download the complete report > [PDF, 4 MB]

"The government should not just keep turning a blind eye to all these killings because they are not fooling anyone with their excuses," said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch. "Credibility will only come if the government follows the National Human Rights Commission's recommendation to name an impartial panel of inquiry for each killing and to hold those found responsible to account."

The joint police-military Rapid Action Battalion Force (RAB) carries out the extrajudicial killings, frequently termed "crossfire killings," and after the fact, the government has justified each killing as legitimate, Human Rights Watch said.

Human Rights Watch noted that often independent groups find signs of torture and abuse on the bodies of "crossfire" victims, and survivors of RAB custody testify that torture is commonly inflicted by the RAB on those in its custody. This is consistent with information in recently leaked US government diplomatic cables that stated there was credible evidence that the RAB tortures detainees.

Human Rights Watch also found that it is not only the Bangladeshi security forces who commit abuses. Acute poverty and unemployment prompts millions of Bangladeshis to cross the border into India in search of jobs or to engage in trade. Many of them are killed by India's Border Security Force (BSF), which engages in indiscriminate and excessive use of deadly force. The Bangladesh government should be more vocal and determined in pressing the Indian government to restrain the Indian border forces and to end the killings that too often occur all along that border.

The government regularly harassed, repressed, and retaliated against its political opponents and labor union activists during 2010, Human Rights Watch said. A leading opposition daily newspaper, Amar Desh, was forced to close down and the editor was arrested under the Anti-Terrorism Act. The editor, Mahmudur Rahman, claimed to have been tortured by the RAB while in custody.

Labor union activists also bore the brunt of the government crackdown against public protests and organized demands. While demanding further increases in the monthly minimum wage, many garment workers were arrested, and some were allegedly beaten while in custody, credible human rights institutions and journalists said.

The government also stripped the internationally respected Bangladesh Center for Worker Solidarity (BCWS) of its nongovernmental organization status, and arrested the top leaders of BCWS (along with other senior labor leaders) on unsubstantiated charges of incitement connected to worker disturbances in late July. Two BCWS leaders publicly stated they were tortured while in police custody.

In a new development, the government took steps to bring to trial those responsible for international crimes in connection with the war of 1971. The government arrested five members of opposition parties, but there are strong suspicions that the detentions at this time are politically motivated. Equally troubling, the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act of 1973 still falls well short of international standards.

"Bangladesh has a long way to go to live up to its commitments, in both national policies and meeting international obligations," Robertson said. "It is only when its people can live free of fear of torture, repression, curbs on free speech, or politically motivated actions that it can truly lay its claim to being a democratic country."
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fwd: RAW’s involvement in Chittagong Hill Tracts





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Zoglul Husain zoglul@hotmail.co.uk


Thank you for circulating the article. About Subir Bhaumik's interview with 'Probe News Magazine', the book referred to is
 
TROUBLED PERIPHERY

Crisis of India's North East

By Subir Bhaumik

 

Naya Diganta published the following article on 20 March 2010 in connection with Subir Bhaumik's book

 

India always wanted a separate Chittagong Hill Tracts: Subir Bhaumik

http://www.dailynayadiganta.com/2010/03/20/fullnews.asp?News_ID=201467&sec=1

 
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:31:01 +0600
Subject: RAW's involvement in Chittagong Hill Tracts
From: bdmailer@gmail.com


RAW's involvement in Chittagong Hill Tracts
 
Mohammad Zainal Abedin

 
The object of India's assistance to PCJSS of the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) and its front organization as well, is limited not only to cripple Bangladesh but use them as tenanted ruffians and mercenaries to uproot the guerrillas of TNV (Tripura), NSCN (Nagaland), MNF (Mizoram), PLA, PAM (Manipur) and ULFA (Assam) who are engaged in an obstinate and steady jungle war to free their regions from Indian exploitative claws. Because of the Chakmas' similarity to of appearance and stature to the tribal of North-eastern India, her intelligence agencies infiltrated many Shanti Bahini (SB) insurgents into the militant outfits of Nagaland, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Assam. India's intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) even uses the common Chakmas as its agents to procure the plans and other information of these militant outfits. A pro-Chakma book published from Calcutta accurately acknowledges:
 
" During the regime of Indira Gandhi when a portion of the Naga and the Mizo communities revolted, the Indian government decided to use the tribals of CHT, Indian government accurately convicted that only the tribals of CHT could help the Indian government in procuring the information about the Nagas and the Mizos more effectively. The Union government of India decided that tribal refugees of Bangladesh (at that time it was East Pakistan) would be rehabilitated in the desolate region of NEFA (i.e. in the North-Eastern Frontier Agency with China, which is now known as Arunachal Pradesh). The rehabilitation of the refugees in the desolate region as a strategy to face the Chinese power of post-62 era perhaps was a well thought decision. Their rehabilitation in the depopulated region would not only increase the population of that area but also play a positive role in the field of defence and security arrangements. The Union government accurately concluded that these tribals would always remain faithful to and dependent on Indian government and a portion of them might have been used in defence force if the situation would demand so (78 ).
 
The RAW operatives closely assisted the Chakma guerrillas. The Chakmas after the change of the government in 1975 contacted the RAW. They offered to infiltrate among the Mizo rebels and pass on information to the Indian government in lieu of asylum. This offer was accepted by the then Indian government (79). 
 
The RAW was involved in training of the rebels of Chakma tribes and Shanti Bahini to carry out subversive activities in Bangladesh (80).
 
In this context, let me quote renowned Indian journalist and BBC's Eastern India correspondent Subir Bhaumik's interview with 'Probe News Magazine':
 
"You will see in my book, from 1975 to 1990, the RAW backed Shanti Bahini........" In 1976 after Shanti bahini went underground, their people had gone for training in India. Mind you, the rank and file were trained in India....... There was a clear indication given to Mr. Larma that India was prepared for up to 50,000 guerillas. Train them, arm them, equip them....."(81).
 
This strategy still persists which makes it easier for Indian government to restrict the anti-India forces of Nagaland, Tripura, Assam, Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and Meghalaya. On the other hand, RAW genuinely perceived that the chakmas are subservient to India, the militants of the North-east would not get shelter even temporarily if the SB remains active in CHT, In fact, one can conclude that SB was used the fence of the Indian border.
 
In 1975, the RAW was instructed to assist the Chakma rebels with arms, supplies, bases and training. Training was concluded in the border camps in Tripura but specialized training was imparted at Chakrata near Dehra Doon. Shantu Larma's Shanti Bahini members were flown to Chakrata and then sent back to Tripura to infiltrate  into CHTs. A RAW office and its operatives at Agartala monitored the progress of the trainees. In 1976, the Shanti Bahini launched its first attack on the Bangladesh forces. A new insurgency had been born and India's secret war in the hills of Bangladesh had begun (82).
   
Motiur Rahaman,editor, Prothom Alo who is known to be soft towards India, disclosed that Indian intelligence agencies tried to create unrest in CHT region and continues it till date (83).
 
Now it is open secret that CHT problem is the direct outcome of Indian manipulation. India with the active cooperation of the Congress ruffians Gopal Krisna Chakma, Sneha Kumar Chakma and others persuaded some ambitious and derailed tribals, mainly the Chakmas, to float a secessionist outfit under the leadership of former Pairliament member Manbebdra Narayan Larma.
 
Though the article No. 9 of the now defunct Indo-Bangladesh Treaty of Cooperation and friendship signed on March 19, 1972 categorically stated that one country would neither allow the terrorists of other to use its territory nor encourage any activities subversive to internal peace and security and territorial integrity. But within a year of signing the treaty India violated the provisions of the treaty by allowing the PCJSS and SB terrorists to operate against Bangladesh from Indian soil.
 
Referring to Larma's RAW connection an English weekly 'Friday' published from Dhaka mentioned that Manbendra Larma crossing the border met Indian intelligence officials in 1976. The same weekly informed that Larma's initiation to patch up with Late President Ziaur Rahman was deterred under Indian pressure. The weekly says: "The attempt of M.N. Larma to negotiate a settlement with Zia was failed as the armed wing of the Jana Sanghati Samiti was compelled to initiate armed operation under Indian pressure in mid 1976" (84).
 
Chittagong Hill Tracts: A Victim of Indian Intervention, Mohammad Zainal Abedin,Eastern Publications, London, 2003, pages.97-100.
 
 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
78. Debjani Dutta & Annusuya Bosu Roy Chowdhury, The Politics and the Struggle of Chittagong Hill Tracts border, Calcutta Research Group, Calcutta, India, Page.63
79. Inside RAW:The Story of India's Secret Service, Asoka Raina, Vikas Publishers, New Delhi, India, 1981, page. 86-87
80. RAW's Role in Furthering India's Foreign Policy, Ashok Biswas, The New Nation, Dhaka, August 31, 1994
81. PROBE, Vol.1, Issue 4, Dhaka, September 1-15, 2001.
82. Binalaksmi Nepram, South Asia's Fractured Frontier, Mittal Publishers, New Delhi, 2002, page-153.
83. Motiur Rahaman,  Prothom Alo, Dhaka, December 10, 2002.
84. Weekly Friday,  Dhaka, June3, 1988.




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fwd: [Dahuk]: Border killings and BSF promises



------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Shimul Chaudhury honestdebater@yahoo.ca


New Age, Dhaka, Sunday, January 23, 2011
http://newagebd.com/newspaper1/letters/6049.html

Border killings and BSF promises

Shimul Chaudhury

IN VIEW of the murders committed regularly by the Border Security Force of India in the border region, a two-day joint working group meeting was held between the home secretaries of Bangladesh and India at Hotel Sheraton in Dhaka on January 18-19. In the past, dozens of such meetings were held on occasions when India also felt that the BSF brutality was too much. On January 19, in a press conference at the end of the meeting, the 10-member Indian delegation regretted the killing of 15-year-old Felani by the BSF on January 7 and refused to comment on several other recent killings. However, it was reported that in the meeting India assured Bangladesh that it would stop killings and tortures of Bangladeshis in the border region. Typical of Indian promises, this too was breached on January 21, when the BSF tortured and left unconscious two Bangladeshi men in the Satkhira border area and both the men are now fighting for life in Satkhira General Hospital.


This has been the case with all the previous Indian promises of stopping border killings and tortures. Let me provide a partial account of such promises in the recent past. On March 19, 2010, Indian home secretary GK Pillai said his country would follow a policy of 'unilateral no firing on the border for a year,' which did not see even an iota of implementation. Since then, dozens of Bangladeshis have been killed and tortured by the BSF. On April 3, 2010, in a flag meeting between the two countries in Satkhira, the BSF regretted killings of Bangladeshis. On March  14, 2010, the BSF personnel and Indian nationals intruded Bangladesh in the Sylhet border region for looting purposes, and in a subsequent meeting between the two countries, the BSF said 'sorry' and promised not to commit such acts of aggression again.


A few years ago, in 2008, the BSF intruded Bangladesh territory and killed three civilians, including a minor boy, in Panchagarh on November 16. In a flag meeting on November 17, 2008, as usual, the BSF said 'sorry' and assured that it would not kill Bangladeshis anymore. There have been over a thousand killings of Bangladeshis by the BSF in the last 10 years or so, and there have been many promises from the Indian side of stopping such atrocities. But, unfortunately, all the promises and assurances have proven completely empty. We have seen no decrease in the murders by BSF and no punishment has ever been meted out to the BSF wrongdoers.


More unfortunate is the way some prominent Bangladeshi news outlets cover BSF atrocities and Indian hypocrisies. Most BSF killings get only one-column reports with a few lines in these newspapers. If Bangladeshi media does not adequately cover the sufferings of the Bangladeshi people, who will? Conversely and surprisingly, a number of Bangladeshi newspapers highlight Indian promises which the media moguls must know to be false and deceptive. This poses a pertinent question in our mind: who actually runs the majority of the news outlets in Bangladesh?





__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Re: Public Letter Of Support For Dr Yunus and the Grameen Bank



http://www.pvamu.edu/pages/143.asp



============================================






> To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
> From: Ezajur@yahoo.com
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 06:33:48 +0000
> Subject: [ALOCHONA] Re: Public Letter Of Support For Dr Yunus and the Grameen Bank
>
> Does anyone have the email address of the gentleman Munir Quddus who sent the email below? I could not find the letter in any newspaper. Thanks. Ezajur
>
> --- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Isha Khan <bdmailer@...> wrote:
> >
> > *Public Letter Of Support For Dr Yunus and the Grameen Bank *
> >
> >
> > Fwd By Munir Quddus
> > <munirtasmina@...>
> > Dear Professor Yunus and the Grameen Bank Family,-As academics and
> > professionals working at home and abroad, we write to express our gratitude
> > and support for the enormous contributions made by micro-credit, by you and
> > by the Grameen Bank (GB) to the task of poverty alleviation in Bangladesh
> > and worldwide.
> >
> > The GB, micro-credit as a poverty alleviation strategy, and you personally -
> > have come under criticism in recent days. Although, no idea, person or
> > institution should be above criticism or the law, we believe many of these
> > criticisms are ill-informed and wanting in context and perspective.
> > We must not allow any minor administrative lapses to cause the nation to
> > lose sight of the enormous good that has been achieved through micro-credit;
> > nor should we float a political balloon on the issue in order to enable
> > naysayers to deny Bangladesh's most innovative solutions in the struggle
> > against poverty. The world is watching to see how we treat one of our finest
> > institutions, and its founding leader.
> >
> > We are happy to see that you have welcomed an inquiry, and have responded,
> > publicly and frankly, to questions from the media. Further, many esteemed
> > citizens, including Professor Rehman Sobhan, have spoken eloquently and
> > judiciously in support of your lifework and the institutions you have built.
> >
> >
> > Your work has received international acclaim, and also much scrutiny. As
> > Bangladeshis, and citizens of the world who care about a better world, we
> > are proud of these achievements. Over three decades you have served the
> > cause of the poor and disenfranchised, especially women, at home and abroad.
> > Your uplifting messages - every person is born an entrepreneur; just because
> > one is poor does not make one unworthy of credit; believe in yourself and
> > create your own employment and the future you wish to have - have impacted
> > the lives of many. Your books and speeches, and the many awards, including
> > the 2006 Nobel Prize for Peace, have done much to bring the problem of
> > global poverty to the forefront of the UN agenda and governmentefforts.
> >
> > Your partnerships with President Bill Clinton on extending the scope of
> > philanthropy, with Bill Gates and other business and political leaders on
> > the concept of Social Business, have brought exciting new ideas,
> > technologies, talent and resources to bear on this most difficult challenge
> > faced by the civilization today. You have presented and implemented
> > innovative solutions. From the 27 borrowers in Jobra, Chittagong, your
> > modest experiment in banking has become a global movement lifting millions
> > out of poverty. The work of the GB and the microcredit model you pioneered
> > has stood the test of time, culture, and geography. There has been a silent
> > revolution uplifting millions of poor, and the status quo has been upended
> > for the better.
> >
> > Sir, you are a dreamer who has demonstrated the courage and genius to
> > realize your dream of ending the misery of extreme poverty. We salute you
> > for staying the course. Although much has been achieved, there is much more
> > that needs to be done. Millions of people in Bangladesh and billions across
> > the globe remain mired in poverty with no access to institutional credit,
> > education, clean water, or health care. Through a network of companies and
> > partnerships – Social Businesses – you are trying to employ the power of
> > markets to alleviate poverty. We applaud these efforts. We also note with
> > great satisfaction that your work has inspired the young in many societies
> > to dedicate their time to serve the poor. We wish you and the Grameen Bank
> > family all success in the future, and look forward to assisting this noble
> > cause in any way we can.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > 1. Dr. Munir Quddus – Dean, College of Business and Professor of Economics,
> > PVAMU,
> > USA (contact person: muquddus@...)
> > 2. Dr. Salim Rashid – Professor of Economics, University of Illinois,
> > Urbana-Champaign,
> > USA
> > 3. Dr. Ruhul Kuddus – Associate Professor of Biology, Utah Valley
> > University, USA
> > 4. Dr. Farida Khan – Professor of Economics and Co-Director, Center for
> > International
> > Studies, University of Wisconsin, Parkside, USA
> > 5. Dr. Faizul Islam – Faculty, University of Maryland University College,
> > Washington DC,
> > USA
> > 6. Dr. Halimur Rashid Khan – Professor of Business Administration, Eastern
> > University,
> > Dhaka
> > 7. Dr. Zahid Hussain, Banani, Dhaka
> > 8. Dr. Mahmudul Anam, Professor of Economics, York University,
> > Toronto,Canada
> > 9. Dr. Farhad Ameen - Professor of Economics, Westchester Community College
> > - State
> > University of New York, Valhalla, NY, USA
> > 10. Dr. Rahim Quazi, Associate Professor of Economics, Director, Center for
> > International
> > Business Education, PVAMU, USA
> > 11. Dr. Ahsan Habib, Professor and Chair Economics, Adrian College,
> > Michigan, USA
> > 12. Dr. Tanweer Akram, Private sector (asset management), Atlanta, GA, USA
> >
> > PS: The views expressed in this letter solely reflect the opinions of the
> > authors, and not of the
> > organizations they are associated with.
> >
> > E mail : munirtasmina@...
> >
> > v
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> [Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
> To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
> alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
> alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Why another int'l airport?



           Your main objection to this proposed airport is its proposed name.  That is your obsession. I really wish you would stop oppressing others with your obsessions about the house of  Mujib.  Political dynasty is an unfortunate tangle, and the entire subcontinent is enmeshed in it. We see it other countries too.

                My interest is Arial Beel and its ecological and geological environ, and the humans who live there, whose livelihoods depend on the wetland.

                     Get a bit of reality.  Not everyone is driven by hatred of a political party like you are. Political parties are here today and gone tomorrow.  Honestly, I can't be thinking about political parties all the time.  How do you guys sustain the hatred and go on justifying your myopia?  You will even  resort to abusive language and insult others for not echoing your rage.

 Anyway,  Arial Beel is precious! 


To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: maqsudo@hotmail.com
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:50:29 +0000
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] Why another int'l airport?

 
emanur rahman....thanks for your brilliant comments.


khoda hafez.







To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: emanur@rahman.com
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:20:07 +0000
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Why another int'l airport?



This airport is critically important. I have mentioned before that there is a critical shortage of infrastructure projects to name after the house of Mujib. Whether its 500 crores or 75% of the annual budget, this high priority must be met.

So what if people are dying - they're only ordinary. They are happy to live in misery if it means the continued worship of Mujib, their father and lord.

I wait for Farida Majid's penance for the sin she has committed.

Joy Bangla!
Emanur Rahman | m. +447734567561 | e. emanur@rahman.com

From: Farida Majid <farida_majid@hotmail.com>
Sender: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 08:00:51 -0500
To: Alochona Alochona<alochona@yahoogroups.com>
ReplyTo: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] Why another int'l airport?


               Let us all protest AGAINST this dubious need for another International Airport.
 
              I am a conservationist.  I see no need to destroy the geologically important wetland of Arial Beel.
 
                  Farida Majid

To:
From: bd_mailer@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:47:48 -0800
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Why another int'l airport?

 
Why another int'l airport?
 
Shahabuddin Ahmad
 
The State Minister for Housing & Public Works, Advocate Abdul Mannan Khan, in an effort to drum up support, has been haranguing the people of greater Dhaka district and promising a new airport and a new city in the Airal Beel, one of the three leading water bodies of the country, spreading over a few police stations of Munshingonj and Dhaka districts.

   According to newspaper reports supporters of the Government came in to hear the State Minister because he promised them better life, employment and economic activities which the promised airport will bring. It is not his ministerial responsibility, while the Minister for Civil Aviation & Tourism, GM Quader decided not to speak on the matter.
   
   Vehement opposition
   The other side of the picture is that people of Dhaka, Munshiganj and the other adjoining areas, who are going to be affected due to their apprehended eviction, vehemently opposed the setting up of the projects and they have robustly said through organised demonstration that the projects could be built over their dead bodies only. Such opposition to the proposed airport is, however, not new. People of Trishal, Mymensingh, Faridpur, Gopalgonj and Madaripur also agited against the project earlier. Total area of land that the Government has plans to acquire for the airport is far more in access than necessary. Shahjalal International Airport has an area of 2,000 acres whereas for the proposed airport the plan is to acquire 15,000 acres and for the proposed Bangabandhu City an area of 10,000 acres.

   Hundreds of thousands of people live in and around the waterbody and earn their living from here. It has an area of 1,66,600 acres and generally goes under 20-25 ft. water during the rainy season and 5 ft. during the dry season. Rice (40,000 MT), fish (700 MT) and vegetables (10,000 MT) grow here and the total estimated value is around Tk. 40,000 (forty thousand) crore.
   The base of the Beel is made up of 'pit coal' according to a satellite picture which was released earlier about the formation of the land mass in Airal Beel and this information is already known.

   Pit coal cannot bear heavy load of widebodied aircraft as a result of which the foundation is likely to sink according to experts.
   A study undertaken a few years back by a Danish Firm for upgrading of Shahjalal International Airport, then known as Zia International Airport, indicates the following projections in respect of aircraft movement and passengers' growth of the airport.




This shows that there is ample scope for Shahjalal International Airport to handle more aircraft every hour and more passengers up to 2025. The study further says that by the year 2030 the airport will be able to handle 1.80 crore passengers with the implementation of some development projects for modernization of the airport.
   
   3 international airports
   There are three International Airports, in Bangladesh now, namely, Shahjalal International Airport in Dhaka, Shah Amanat Airport in Chittagong and Osmani International Airport in Sylhet. All these airports are capable of receiving and sending wide bodied aircraft including Boeing-747. Shahjalal Airport was established in 1979, Chittagong airport was upgraded with Japanese Financial and Technical Assistance in the year 1998 and the Osmani International Airport in Sylhet has been upgraded gradually.

   Shahjalal International Airport, (one runway 10,500 ft. long) formally known as Zia International Airport, due to its overwhelming use, as it handles about 90 per cent of the total air passengers and cargo, has already been expanded by adding a cargo village, multistoried car park, renovation of departure lounge and extension of the terminal building.

   A project was taken up by the CAAB to upgrade Shahjalal International Airport under mixed credit financing of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark at a cost of Tk. 41,404 lakh and it was approved by the government in 2008. The components of the project are: i) Re-construction of Taxi-way; ii) Modernization of drainage System; iii) Procurement of Maintenance equipment; iv) Procurement of Visual guidance; v) Procurement of Primary and Secondary Radar; vi) Procurement of Navigational Aids; vii)  Procurement of Radio-Communication equipment; viii) Extension & construction of operation building; Refurbishment of transmitting building etc. The process of inviting tenders are still under inter-ministerial consultations, although the project was supposed to be initiated physically earlier and completed by 2012.
   
   Adverse impact
   The question now arises that since Shahjalal International Airport (SIA) will be able to handle 1.80 crore passengers by 2030 and a plan is already under process of finalisation, why construct a new airport in a wetland area at a proposed cost of Tk. 50,000 crore for which thousands of people will be displaced, agricultural produce worth Tk. 40,000 crores annually will be destroyed and damage the ecology and bio-diversity of the Airal Beel area?
   The cronies of the government who support the establishment of the airport and a new city in Airal Beel --- both in the name of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman --- often cite well-known airports such as, Osaka Kansai International Airport in Japan and Chek Lap Kok Airport in Hong Kong which have been built on islands and say that building the proposed airport in the Airal Beel will not pose any problem.

   Those who advise the Government in this fashion do really live in ivory towers because the level of economic development and technological achievement of Japan and Hong Kong are not comparable with that of Bangladesh. Besides, the agency in Japan and Hong Kong took long time to study the need for expansion, whereas, the present government has not done any serious home work for the project yet, although information is available that foreign firms are lobbying with the high ups of the government for the project.

   Osaka Kansai International Airport was built on an artificial island of 2.5 miles in length and land filling alone took 3 years. It stands on columns which can be adjusted to subsidence. This is one of the most expensive airport in the world and took 7 years for Japan to construct the airport. The Chek Lap Kok Airport is a replacement of the former Kaitak Airport of HK, established in 1925. The completion of this airport also took 7 years from 1991-1998 and the cost was US$ 20 billion. It has been built partly in hilly area, partly on an artificial island.
   
   Danida study
   The Danida study, a work of professionals, says that in the very long run after forecast and the master plan period it may be necessary to add a new runway parallel to the present one, suggesting it to be located on the Western site of the present runway. Alternately, when the traffic in far distant future will exceed the maximum available runway capacity, a relocation of the entire airport to a remote site must be considered. The SIA will take, therefore, another 25 years to reach the suggested stage according to the recommendations in the study.

   As a matter of fact in its study, Danida has said that even though economic and social progress have been achieved by Bangladesh during the last decade, Bangladesh still continue to be one of the poorest country of the world due to prevailing social, political and economic reasons. If, however, for any God-sent boom and due to unforeseen priority yet unknown either to the Government or to the gentry of the country, the number of air passengers increase by leaps and bounds, SIA can be expanded within its existing area as mentioned before by offering efficient management of passenger handling, landing parking, take off facilities, modern control tower, expansion of terminal building and if necessary transferring the domestic service to the old Tejgaon Airport which, most of the time is idle. For emergency services, in case of accidents and temporary closure, alternate airports in Chittagong and Sylhet can help as air bridges.
   
   Feasibility study
   The government, therefore, should engage itself first to have a feasibility study including a market survey to justify the need for a international airport and if the studies are found to be giving good justifications economically, socially, and politically then only the Government can take up the projects and NOT now. I refer here to a story which Abdul Mannan, a former State Minister for Civil Aviation & Tourism, and who also served as the Managing Director of Biman and Director of Finance of the same organization, wrote in the concluding parts of his commentary "Airal Beel Airport". It says, "In fine we may quote the famous story of the invisible robe, the King and his wise counsels. The master tailor pantomimically dressed the King with the invisible robe. Learned Counsels started praising the robe. The King came to his senses when a little boy cried out, Oh, look, the King is naked". We need a little boy with courage to tell the Government, the unalloyed truth.
   Email: ttw1@live.com
 







__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___