Banner Advertiser

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

[ALOCHONA] Monopoly of foreign companies in telecommunications



Monopoly of foreign companies in telecommunications

On May 28, 15 civil society organizations led by EquityBD organized a rally in front of National Press Club, expressing concern over the monopoly of foreign companies in the telecommunication sector. They urged the Finance Minister to announce special allocation for the public company TeleTalk. The 15 organizations included Arpon, On line Knowldege Centre, Aeso, SDO, MABS, Lead Trust, Prodip, Protikrit, BNNRC, Voice, Bangladesh Bhumihin Samity, Bangladesh Krishok Federation, Manoush Manusher Jonnyo, Sirac Bangladesh and ACI.

Speakers said that telecommunications was now a basic human right and not a luxury anymore. It is also related to state sovereignty and security.

Mostafa Kamal Akanda of EquityBD was moderator of the programme. Addressing the programme were Rafiqul Islam Pothik of  Protikrit, Zahidul Alam of BNNRC, SM Saikat of Sirac Bangladesh, Feroze Ahmed of Lead Trust, Subal Sarkar of Bangladesh Bhumihin Samity, Badrul Alam of Bangladesh Krishok Federation, Shipra Rani Das of Bangladesh Kishani Shobha, Sayeed Aminul Haque and Rezaul Karim Chowdhury of EquityBD.

They said that the monopoly of foreign companies in the telecommunication sector has four major problems. (i) A large section of the population is now a days dependent on foreign companies for such services. If they stop services due to any differences with the government, this will have a devastating effect. (ii) The profit bills which have to be send to their country of origin is being paid in dollars. Such a repatriation is a threat to the dollar reserve of the country, while we have priority to purchase food and other necessary items from abroad with this reserve. (iii) It is also a threat to the state security while all information is passed through the server of these companies. (iv) The foreign companies have a tendency to intervene in our national policy decisions through their Ambassadors and especially through the World Bank and Asian Development Bank.

Badrul Alam of Bangladesh Krishok Federation said foreign direct investment has done hardly any good for developing countries, so there is need for good competition for both public and private sector.  Zahidul Alam of BNNRC said foreign companies look for profit, while we need to invest in our public companies which should look to minimize growing digital divide. Rezaul Karim Chowdhury of EquityBD said that the government announced massive plan for Digital Bangladesh in its Vision 2021, but if there is no state-sponsored infrastructure like Tele Talk  mobile network, then the whole financial benefit will go to the foreign mobile companies. Speakers urged Finance Minister to announce a plan and allocation in budget 2011 -2012 to strengthen the public company TeleTalk in this regard.

http://www.probenewsmagazine.com/index.php?index=2&contentId=7190



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] India wants to be a power in the region



India wants to be a power in the region

Does the Elephant Dance? Contemporary Indian Foreign Policy. By David M. Malone. Oxford University Press; 425 pages; $45 and £25. Buy from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk

 Meet my buddy

ONE day India will be a great power. Its demography, nukes and growing economy make that almost inevitable. Outsiders, especially in the West, promote its heft so it can serve as an emerging rival to China. Look at the itineraries of world leaders, such as Barack Obama late in 2010, who troop to Delhi to say India deserves a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, and it may seem the country has already arrived.

Yet, as David Malone clearly sets out in his brisk survey of its foreign policy, there is a long way to go before the Indian elephant is really dancing. Its international policy is still mostly reactive, incremental and without any grand vision. Its few diplomats are good, but terribly overstretched. The world's biggest democracy is coy to the point of feebleness in promoting its values abroad. And its big but ill-equipped armed forces, perhaps the navy aside, trouble no military planners outside of South Asia.

It is easy to see why. India's long history of being invaded, and its preoccupation with holding itself together as a viable, democratic state, have left it little scope for acting overseas. Indians, like Americans, can be insular, believing that their huge country is the centre of the world. Its few leaders who bothered seriously with foreign matters, notably Jawaharlal Nehru, the brilliant and charismatic first prime minister, fell into moralising about others' wicked deeds and tried to avoid being embroiled in the cold war, but he did little to promote national interests. India still rues his baffling early decision to reject an offer of a permanent Security Council seat.

Yet India's biggest weakness, as Mr Malone rightly sets out, is in its own region. The trauma of partition ensured that relations with Pakistan would long be dreadful, and India has shown admirable restraint in the face of bloody provocations from across the border. But as the local hegemon it should be doing much more to foster economic ties and stability all over its back yard. Instead relations with all its neighbours, with the exception of a couple of minnows like Bhutan and the Maldives, are mostly sour, and regional trade is pitiful. Until India shows more charm—or strength—to those nearby, distant powers are unlikely to take its global pretensions very seriously.

The author, until recently Canada's high commissioner to Delhi, has a breadth of knowledge and makes his case well. He might have heeded his own advice and spent more time on India's biggest headache next door. The section on Pakistan, just six of 425 pages, is too slight for that troubling relationship. He might have done more, too, to justify his optimism that war between Pakistan and India is now less likely "than ever". After all, violent confrontation between the two nuclear powers flares repeatedly. The shifting relations with an increasingly radicalised and troubled Pakistan—American feeling is certainly cooling towards the powers in Islamabad—will also affect India's foreign policy in time.

Mr Malone concludes that India will develop no grand foreign-policy vision, opting instead for pragmatism guided by economic interest. The hunt for oil and other energy, in the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa, mean a greater international reach and more competition with China. India will resist Western pressure to be any sort of counterweight to the much bigger power to its east, while at the same time expanding its trade with the rest of Asia. As for promoting values, India will try to show itself as a model of rapid economic growth and tolerant democracy. The elephant's dance will, in the end, be the great power of its example.

http://www.economist.com/node/18802750


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fake Revolutions



Fake Revolutions

The debate is over; the revolutions are fake, the people behind them illegitimate.
by Tony Cartalucci


CANVAS leader Srdja Popovic stands here before Columbia, a public sponsor of the US State Department's Movements.org. While he denies he is being funded by the US government, just as his disingenuous movement did in 2000 before being found to have lied, his organization works in tandem with the US State Department's agenda and the various organizations it openly funds.
....

Bangkok, Thailand June 14, 2011 - The degenerate, profiteering liars that populate the Serbian based "CANVAS" organization maintain that while the US government had initially funded them as they overthrew the government of Serbia in 2000, currently the US government does not fund them - that they are privately funded. Unfortunately for these meddling interlopers, the US government itself is "privately owned" by many of the people who fund the organizations they claim as partners.

These partners include:

Albert Einstein Institution (foundation-funded including the corporate-lined Acra Foundation)
United States Institute for Peace (USIP) (funded through Congress)
Freedom House (Neo-Con infested)
International Republican Institute (IRI) (headed by warmonger John McCain)
New Tactics (Ford Foundation-funded, Soros-funded)
Humanity in Action (Ford Foundation-funded, US State Department-funded)

The organization is obviously sensitive about who it is seen dealing with, partnering with, and receiving money from. Knowledge of its true nature and purpose has systematically been lied about from its very inception. Foreign Policy reported that "Like the entire opposition to Milosevic, Otpor [now known as CANVAS] took money from the U.S. government, and lied about it. When the real story came out after Milosevic fell, many Otpor members quit, feeling betrayed." As CANVAS was exposed for its more recent involvement in Egypt, they quickly changed their "Partnership" page to "External Links." In a recent documentary, where CANVAS openly claims responsibility for training and guiding unrest across the planet, they reiterate that they are not funded by the US government. This is a dubious claim at best, considering who they associate with and how their "mission" dovetails with identical efforts by openly US-funded and sponsored organizations like Movements.org.

The documentary produced by Journeyman Pictures features CANVAS, its founder, and the story of how they have influenced "color revolutions" all over the globe. While the documentary is fairly objective about its particular subject matter, namely CANVAS' role in the unrest, within a greater context and amidst overwhelming evidence there is no question at all whether or not these revolutions are entirely engineered and contrived.



Apparently unaware of the giant, foreign-funded logo looming over his right shoulder, Mohamed Adel of April 6 tries to convince his audience that there was no foreign plot behind Egypt's recent foreign-funded revolution.
....

The documentary concludes contemplating the future of Egypt and Tunisia and the changes that are to come. One Egyptian activist, Mohamed Adel of the April 6 Movement, while siting in front of a giant banner featuring the US-funded Otpor fist claims that the US is incapable of influencing millions of people - seemingly unaware of the mass manipulation and social engineering of America's 300 million people, or the billions conned, duped, manipulated, and certainly "influenced" by the Fortune 500 globally on a daily basis. He claims that the Egyptian people want to be the masters of their own destiny, ironically, even as a US-funded logo looms over his shoulder and even after he himself trained in Serbia at the US-founded CANVAS and his own April 6 Movement attended a US State Department-sponsored confab in NYC in 2008 to train for a revolution now admittedly engineered from abroad and led by Mohamed ElBaradei, a listed member on the US corporate-funded International Crisis Group.

The documentary claims that Tunisians are busy enjoying their new "freedoms," showing footage of people talking on phones and conversing in public. Unfortunately, freedom is not talking, nor is it even casting a vote in an election. Freedom is being the undisputed master of your own destiny, being independent both politically and economically. However, with the nationalistic regimes deposed and the "economic liberation" underway in the US State Department's newly despoiled lands, rules, regulations, decrees and laws will be imposed upon these "free nations" by self-proclaimed international arbiters, corporate-funded policy think-tanks, and contrived, illegitimate "international" courts - all entirely offshore and removed from any sense of accountability to the people they lord over, including the Tunisians and Egyptians.

As the global corporate-financier elite and their tangled web of NGOs, civil society organizations, and their international military machines stall in Libya and Syria, they still are staging and moving against other sovereign nations with their social engineering "color revolutions." The list is extensive, including Belarus, Venezuela, Iran, Thailand, China, Myanmar, and even Pakistan.

Know these charlatans and know their game, as they are far from through. And while their dark deeds are done in far flung distant lands, the empowerment and hubris they reap from afar will soon enough be brought home to bear. Threats to target Texas with a "no-fly zone" after an attempt to usurp the TSA's authority already echos the madness being exercised in war-ravaged Libya. Libya's battle and the dangerous precedent a victory there for the globalists would set is already hitting home.



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Dhaka University teachers.....



Dhaka University teachers.....



http://www.amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/06/15/87374


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Those godfathers...



Those godfathers...



http://www.bd-pratidin.com/?view=details&type=gold&data=Wallpaper&pub_no=407&cat_id=1&menu_id=1&news_type_id=1&index=0


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] A Portrait of India's Intolerance



A Portrait of India's Intolerance

Country's speech restrictions didn't allow M.F. Husain to paint in peace.

By SALIL TRIPATHI

The Wall Street Journal – June 14, 2011

Maqbool Fida Husain was India's most celebrated painter, and his death in London last week was front-page news across the subcontinent. However, toward the end of his life, Husain had trouble finding galleries willing to show his work. He lived in Dubai, Doha or London for most of the last two decades because he couldn't paint in peace in his own country, even becoming a Qatari national last year.

Husain's story says much about modern India. The troubles started in 1996, when the magazine Vichar Mimansa ("Discussion of Thoughts") published a decades-old sketch that showed a nude Saraswati, the Hindu goddess of learning. That discovery electrified Hindu activists, who began filing lawsuits against the painter for hurting their sentiments. These activists were able to persecute Husain by taking advantage of laws intended to prevent the incitement of religious hatred. Though the Indian constitution guarantees freedom of expression, it allows "reasonable restrictions" to safeguard "the interests of the sovereignty and integrity" of the country and "public order, decency or morality." The penal code makes it a crime "to outrage religious feelings" and also outlaws "promoting enmity" between different groups on the basis of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language—and the all-inclusive "etc."

Fringe Hindu groups claimed to have been offended by the artist's work, and pressured the authorities to initiate proceedings. Indian courts often throw such cases out, but there were multiple cases against him. When a few of them reached the Delhi High Court on appeal, it ruled in Husain's favor. So did the Supreme Court in a similar case. But the court judgments did not stem the tide of vitriol. Vigilantes continued to file cases against him, attacked his works and damaged the studio of a television network that polled its readers on whether Husain should be given India's highest civilian honor.

An artist with weaker convictions would have stopped painting altogether, but Husain continued to portray the many colors of this pluralist democracy. Born around 1915, he got his artistic start painting cinema posters. Formally trained at the prestigious Sir Jamshedji Jeejeebhoy School of Art in Bombay, he was an integral member of the Progressive Artists' Group, which brought together leading modernists soon after India's independence in 1947. He painted horses all his life; his other recurring themes included celebration of Indian music, Sufi art and the Sanskrit epic Mahabharata. Since 1996, he continued to paint Hindu deities as well as paintings inspired by Bollywood star Madhuri Dixit, whom he called his muse.

But he couldn't go on very long. At one count last decade, there were hundreds of cases pending against him across India, and some death threats too. Instead of defending Husain's right to express his imagination, the authorities did nothing, actually adding to pressure from activists. In 2006, several state governments decided to prosecute him for outraging feelings after he painted "Bharat Mata" (Mother India) in the nude. The controversy scared those who otherwise would have been happy to exhibit his work, including the organizers of the 2008 Indian Art Fair in Delhi, which had the works of 300 artists but not Husain's.Exasperated by the lack of support from the Indian state and the continued harassment—both physical and legal—Husain gave up. He was living outside India anyway, and last year he publicly renounced his Indian citizenship.

Hindu nationalists justified their attacks on Husain's art by noting that the Indian state has allowed other faiths to block literature that has offended them. India was the first country in the world to ban Salman Rushdie's "Satanic Verses." Muslim activists last year chopped off the hand of T.J. Joseph, a university professor in Kerala, because he gave an exam question that was deemed insulting to Muhammad. Christian groups have protested films like "The Da Vinci Code" and "The Last Temptation of Christ."

To be sure, a large number of books get published in India, hundreds of films get made and galleries hold many exhibitions without incident. But artists like Husain inhabit speech at the edge of acceptability, speech that challenges conventional thought. The controversial sketch of Saraswati, for example, is an elegant white-on-black line drawing, which makes the viewer reflect on the old Indian tradition of "nirakara," or formlessness. Yet instead of questioning themselves when provoked, extremist Hindus, like extremists from other faiths, have reacted with anger.The trouble is that along with such sectarian anger comes New Delhi's timidity in protecting individual rights. Hindus have every right to peacefully protest Husain's depictions, but Indian law allows them to become vigilantes who chill all expression.

India will now try to claim Husain as a son of its soil. Someone will suggest issuing a postage stamp in his name. Others will talk about naming roads or art galleries after him. A more fitting tribute would be to revoke those provisions of Indian law that drove Husain out of the country. The next M.F. Husain should not have to curb his imagination or dream smaller dreams. 
—Mr. Tripathi, a writer in London, is the author of "Offense: The Hindu Case" (Seagull, 2009).

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303714704576383173779641758.html?KEYWORDS=SALIL+TRIPATHI


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fwd: [Dahuk]: We have not forgotten Awami Killings



--------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Delwar Mazumder <delwar98@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 14, 2011

Kindly see How Awami league killing the people
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYKch23wj-E




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fwd: Fascist brutality stops oil-gas march



------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Zoglul Husain <zoglul@hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Wed, Jun 15, 2011


The Oil-gas committee held a protest march on 14 June against ConocoPhillips PSC deal to be signed on 16 June 2011. The march was stopped by brutal police atrocity of the fascist govt. More than 30 activists were injured including Anthropologist Professor Rahnuma Ahmed (in the picture below).
 
Professor Anu Muhammad said, the energy ministry has now turned into the 'Kasimbazar palace' (where Mir Jafar hatched plots against Nawab Sirajuddaula) where conspiracies are hatched against the power sector.
 
The committee vowed to develop powerful resistance not only to protect oil-gas-port, but also against transit and all other agreements detrimental to the national interest.
 
The 'Amar Desh' report:


(Please click to read)
http://www.amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/06/15/87377 
 
The New Age report

 image

(Please click to read)
http://newagebd.com/newspaper1/frontpage/22564.html 
 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Bangladesh leases African land - Clinton warns Africa of 'neo-colonialism'

You see, BD Agents of ISI, the JI people had to come up with an angle to say something against USA in that news.
What I want to know is, why these Bangladeshi Investors don't buy some un-inhibited islands, clean them up using Bangladeshis, develop Farmland, implant Bangladeshi Workers there and grow Rice themselves?
There are hundreds of such islands for sale in this world but the cheapest could be found in Pacific Ocean northeast of Australia. Population congestion would also reduce this way.

--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, qar <qrahman@...> wrote:
>
>
> I did not see any indication this was part of any "Plan" of our government. If they knew how to plan, I am sure we would have seen some evidences of it. It is a pure business venture and calling it colonialism is premature in my honest opinion.
>
> Some people are afraid this investment will be used as an excuse to do man power business. By taking money from people offering them "Jobs" in foreign lands and stick it to them. It is too soon to comment on it. Albeit some business houses expressed doubts about viability of such plan. Africa has major problem with water, man power, power and transportation, so we have to wait and see how these enterprising business houses make it work.
>
> Either way I feel secretary Clinton's comment was taken out of context and she was talking about China NOT Bangladesh. Having said that, it will be nice to watch if some of our countrymen can make this project work.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mir Monaz Haque <haque@...>
> To: alochona <alochona@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sun, Jun 12, 2011 11:26 am
> Subject: [ALOCHONA] Bangladesh leases African land - Clinton warns Africa of 'neo-colonialism'
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Neo-Colonialism?
>
> Bangladesh has leased tens of thousands of hectares of farmland in Africa as part of a government drive to improve food security in the poverty-stricken South Asian nation, an official said recently.
>
>
>
> Two Bangladeshi companies have leased 40,000 hectares of land in Uganda and Tanzania and another firm will sign a deal for a further 10,000 hectares in Tanzania this week, foreign ministry director Farhadul Islam said.
>
>
>
> “The government strongly supports companies leasing farmland in Africa. The aim is to bring most of the farms’ output back to Bangladesh to ease food shortages,” he said.
>
> Bangladesh’s 150 million citizens have been hit hard by sharp increases in the price of rice, the staple grain, which was up by an average 50 percent year-on-year in April, according to official figures.
>
> Since Bangladesh identified overseas farming as a key way of improving food security late last year, local businessmen have also scoured Africa for suitable land to lease, Islam said.
>
> Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina gave a green signal to a proposal that Bangladesh leases land in some African countries and send farmers there to grow crops like rice and cotton for its consumption as well as export.
>
>
> Why the reports of Bangladesh farming mega deals in Africa sound "neo-colonialism"
>
> One of the most intensely discussed international economic phenomena in recent years is that of companies from across the globe coming to farm crops for their home markets in Africa.
>
> Opinions about this trend span the ideological spectrum. Doubters and outright opponents seem to have the loudest voices, but this has not discouraged foreign investors who see Africa as the next big farming frontier, nor accommodative African governments hoping these deals will kick-start their moribund agricultural sectors and spur broader-based overall economic development.
>
> The latest reported deal-of-the-month are plans by Bangladesh investors to lease land for a similar purpose in a number of African countries. Very little is known about the claimed Bangladesh farming deals, an opacity common to these arrangements and one of their most criticized aspects. What little has come out in news reports has almost all been from the Bangladeshi entities reportedly involved, with no word yet from the African partners. The question is, is it neo-colonialism?
>
> The latest farming deals are all being reported from the Bangladeshi side, with an almost we-can't-believe-we-have-negotiated-such-good-deals breathlessness. There has been no word heard at all so far from the governments of Uganda and Tanzania, two of the countries named as willing, even eager to lease tens of thousands of hectares to Bangladeshi companies.
>
> Under the plans, the Contract Farming System will enable Bangladeshi companies to get at least 60% of the produce. In return Bangladesh will train African farmers in rain-fed rice cultivation, seed conservation and irrigation.'' On the other hand, Bangladesh Government says (and also Mr. Abdul Matlub Ahmad, owner of Nitol Group says) that, “under the deal, we can bring some 80 percent of our output back to the country after payment of some annual fees. We shall employ some 25,000 Bangladeshi workers â€" some 90 percent from Uganda,” he said. But in Africa foreign leasing of large tracts of land can be a very sensitive topic.
>
>
>
> My Remarks
>
>
>
> Bangladesh is planning a new innovation (or should I say a new invasion to Africa) without any social-anthropological analysis. This plan is not sustainable; because sustainable development is a pattern of resource use that aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present, but also for generations to come. That means it should meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs, or - Environment, Local People, Future (ELF).
>
>
>
> A new plan made only by politician in Bangladesh cannot be sustainable. Where are our Sociologists, Anthropologists, Socialreformers, and Philosophers? Society becomes an object of curiosity when people feel the need to make sense out of rapidly changing social realities. As long as the social order in which we live seems stable and unchanging, we tend to take it for granted and think little about it; it appears so natural and normal to us. But when we are confronted with sudden changes in our social environment, our lives transformed by forces that we do not understand. We are bound to ask questions such as: What causes such changes? Where will they lead us? Are they changes for the better or for the worse?
>
>
>
> Clinton warns Africa of 'new colonialism'
>
> U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Saturday warned Africa of a creeping "new colonialism" from foreign investors and governments interested only in extracting the continent's natural resources to enrich themselves and not the African people.
>
> Clinton said that African leaders must ensure that foreign projects are sustainable and benefit all their citizens, not only elites. A day earlier, she cautioned that China's massive investments and business interests in Africa need to be closely watched so that the African people are not taken advantage of.
>
> "It is easy, and we saw that during colonial times, it is easy to come in, take out natural resources, pay off leaders and leave," Clinton said. "And when you leave, you don't leave much behind for the people who are there. We don't want to see a new colonialism in Africa."
>
> Clinton said the United States didn't want foreign governments and investors to fail in Africa, but they should also give back to the local communities.
>
> "We want them to do well, but also we want them to do good," she said.
>
> "We don't want them to undermine good governance, we don't want them to basically deal with just the top elites, and frankly too often pay for their concessions or their opportunities to invest."
>
> -Monaz Haque, Berlin
>


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [ALOCHONA] Yellow Culture Intrudes in Bangladesh



Pulleez spare us this nonsence. As though our culture for the last several years has been squeaky clean and unpolluted. Step aside your high horse and smell the s....t that is all around.

 

Regardless of political affiliations Bangladeshi middle classes like their other South Asian brethern are going through an orgy of excesss and materialistic consumption. This is just a trojan horse for the usual suspects - communalists to make their anti Indian, anti hindu rants. To make Bengali culture strong we have to be open and creative not by shutting down and putting our heads in the sand.

 

 

 

 


-----Original Message-----
From: Isha Khan
Sent: Jun 13, 2011 12:54 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients@null, null@null
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Yellow Culture Intrudes in Bangladesh

 

Yellow Culture Intrudes in Bangladesh

Dr. Muhammad Abdul Mannan Chowdhury

We are facing a grave cultural crisis. Sexual harassment, rape, violence, naked concert, nude dances, cyber porn culture, porno-films, eve-teasing, drug addiction etc. have become the regular events of our society. If such events are allowed to continue uninterrupted, the future of our existence will be at stake; our serene culture and golden Islamic tradition will be completely ruined. In such a critical moment, we must not remain silent. We must take positive steps to protect our culture from complete ruination. Allah (SWT) said, "You do not throw yourselves by your own hands towards ruination. Perform good deeds nicely. Allah (SWT) loves those who perform good deeds." (2:195). Viewed in this perspective, below is an attempt to analyze the nature and causes of cultural aggression with some practical examples and to suggest some pragmatic measures to overcome the crisis so as to protect our culture and heritage from total collapse.

A vulgar show was staged at Dhaka's Army Stadium on December 10, 2010 in which Shahrukh Khan appeared in front of roughly 25,000 people. The show was watched live by millions of TV Spectators, as Bangladeshi Channel Baishaki got this show on their live broadcast. In this show half nude Russian girls were exhibiting their exposed bodies to public in the name of dancing. The Bangladeshi flop actresses like Shimla also went at the Army Stadium wearing a western type dress, almost exposing their bodies. Shahrukh Khan alone took US$ 3, 00,000 for this show while another significant amount of money was taken by other members of his team. It is said that most of the Russian girls who accompanied the entourage of Shahrukh Khan were suspected to be sex workers in Mumbai. (http:www.weeklyblitz.net/1168/Shahrukh-Khan-vulgar-show-in-bangladesh).

Event Management Group Antar Showbiz organized this event. This organization already arranged a series of big show with major international artistes like Adnan Sami, Shaan and the band Junoon. The main target of this show was to smuggle crores of money from Bangladesh in the name of organizing such entertainment event, especially at a time when countrymen were suffering badly from financial crisis and poverty. The elders in the family were feeling ashamed and uncomfortable when their children were watching this vulgar show in TV. Sanskritik Aggression Protirodh Manch (SAPM), a cultural forum and some political parties seriously protested against this vulgar show.

Indian films are now at the epicentre  of the culture wars. The critics were incensed by the wanton sexuality in Indian films. They are corrupting our youth. Satellite television is everywhere with 20-30 channels. Indian films are everywhere in Bangladesh. There are about ten Indian channels, showing movies and movie songs round the clock. VHS tapes have been eclipsed by the VCD, on which Hindi films are the biggest sellers. It is said that there is an increase in rapes in the city of Dhaka due to the influence of Hindi films and TV series. The newspapers argue that everyone is watching the sex sizzle on the screen, but their reality is nothing like it – so they are driven to rape.

We are quite appalled at many of the shows in Indian TV channels that are apparently for children. The Indian channels are full of contests when ten year old girls are dressed up and made up like Bollywood actresses, gyrating to some hit Hindi songs, making all those suggested moves in front of an ecstatic audience and approving panel of judges. Then there are singing contests where again, little boys and girls sing out their hearts some raunchy Hindi number against the backdrop of a gaudy, glittery stage. We also find the identical shows in our own channels with the same ridiculous dance sequences performed by preteens, wearing layers of makeup and making moves that would put any Dhaliwood film extra to shame. Where are the children, we begin to wonder. Oh No! They have been replaced by mini-adults.

Proper cultural exchange is a powerful tool for minimizing hostility between nations or communities. However, it is quite surprising to note that even in this age of information technology, India is not as liberal in exchanging information with Bangladesh as one would expect. On the other hand, Bangladesh has a very lenient policy in allowing cable operators to transmit all the electronic media (almost all channels of the Indian TV) of India. But in West Bengal, the cable operators usually do not transmit any Bangladeshi TV channel programs presumably due to some restrictions imposed by the Indian government. This, in turn, largely deprives the Indian people in general and the people of West Bengal in particular of a more vividly understanding of the Bangladeshi people. Indian policy in this case is more inclined to a sort of cultural intrusion or aggression than the creation of healthy cultural exchange.

Similar is the case with the exchange of books. A walk through the College Street, the biggest book market of Kolkata is a case in point. In this famous book mall, it is not easy to get books published from Bangladesh. Even the books of eminent writers like Humayun Ahmed, Shamsur Rahaman, Syed Shamsul Haque, Showkat Ali, Imdadul Hoque Milan, Al -Mahmood, Nirmalendu Goon are not available due to some restrictions on book import from Bangladesh. As Subimal Basak, a dedicated editor of a little magazine in Kolkata said, "The central government of India is cautious about Bengali nationalism. That is why it does not want to develop any long cultural ties with Bangladesh."

The sexual harassment or stalking of women has taken the form of a menace for our society. Increasing numbers of women have been falling prey to unwarranted and unsolicited attention from wayward youths, who have clearly developed the feeling that they can get away with their sinister activities. Of course, a principal focus, all the way from the citizen's level to the government, has been a raising of awareness of the issue and the ways and means by which it can be rolled back. Allah (SWT) said, "Say to the faithful so that they control their eye-sight and protect the special organ of their body. This is the best for them. Certainly Allah is quite aware about what they do." Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said, "There are more than seventy branches and sub-branches of faith. The highest branch is to say 'La Ilaha Illallah' ( There is no God but God) and the lowest branch is to remove the obstacles from the road. "In this connection I like to mention one event of Prophet Muhammad (SAW). Once Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was riding on an ass during the Farewell Hajj. A young companion was sitting on the ass behind him. The companion was looking at a beautiful woman. Prophet (SAW) turned his (the companion) eyes straight. The companion was again looking at her and Prophet (SAW) turned his eyes straight. When Prophet (SAW) turned his eyes straight for the third time, the companion stopped looking at the woman any more. This implies the fact that man should not look at woman with a sinister motive or without any good reason to do so.

Both the state and the family have to play their role in offsetting the menace of sexual harassment. The legal and punitive action against the stalkers should be enforced strictly with no exception or relaxation. The laws against eve-teasing or sexual harassment should be widely circulated so that people from all walks of life can become aware of the fact. The provision to punish stalkers through an operation of mobile court is a positive step in the right direction. However, the concerned authorities should be careful in ensuring that the innocent do not suffer and the laws against stalking are not misused or abused by individuals or groups to settle personal scores. The law enforcers and security forces should be responsible to track down the elements who harass woman by threatening them or using abusive and profane languages by mobile phone. Above all, children must be imbued right from the beginning with the ideas of morality and a sense what constitutes a stable, educated and fair social order where men and woman are partners in all spheres of life. Beside schools, the parents have a role to play in this regard. They must teach their children the fundamental value of life in line with their respective religions and moral beliefs.

Our youngsters are being misled, but we are not protecting them. Cyber sex culture has already occupied the young minds. Many incidents of making porno films by cheating girl friends are reported by the news paper. The days are not far away when our children will take their sex partners inside our home and introduce them to us, like they do in the western world. We are facing culture violence in the form of a rising graph of rape and abduction of minor girls and young woman by social miscreants, so to speak. Among others, neo-colonialism and globalization may be held responsible for this sort of cultural aggression, so to speak. When the ex-colonies were becoming independent one by one in the aftermath of the Second World War, the neo-colonialists accepted the policy of cultural aggression as one of the tactics to maintain or sustain their influence and market. Specially, after being defeated in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Mozambique etc., the neo-colonialists became sure that at present it is very difficult to win by dint of military might alone against a nation. Rather, it is easier to weaken and bring under control the nation by destroying its culture. So, they infuse into the LDCs sexual pervasion, drug addiction, pornography and porno-films, mentality to depend on the neo- colonialists, brain-wash intellectuals etc. They try to divert the people of LDCs, especially to keep away the young minds from revolution or any change in life. The cultural aggressors think that preventive power of a nation will certainly be destroyed, if its culture is destroyed.

Globalization has gobbled the whole world. There is virtually no part on earth which has not been hit and bit by the enormous fang of the monster. All aspects of life have come under the sinister impact of globalization, growing and dwelling in the shadow of capitalism. It dazzles like the sun and blinds normal vision.

With its apparent grandeur, it ensnares people, though it is hollow in its core. Literature has now assumed new dimension in recent decades in the face of globalization, focusing on issues like diasporas, hybridity and cosmopolitan culture. It has been ushering in a system of internationalism dismantling the barriers of narrow nationalism. So, the dream of a world without borders hovers over the horizon which may be a matter of pleasure for some quarter. However, globalization has brought more hazards than comforts. A mechanical and materialistic view of life has been imported and incorporated, through the vehicle of globalization, into oriental space hitherto basking in the complacency of idealism. It has gnawed at the ethical base of this region. It has been a great loss for humanity: a colossal moral defeat.

Globalization preaches the philosophy of hedonism. Consumer goods are spread around and mantra is whispered: "Consume, consume, consume. You have no work other than consumption." Thus globalization has made the human soul spiritually sick, morally bankrupt and intellectually pretentious. It has posed a genuine threat to indigenous cultural and language across the globe. The dominant culture is out there to suppress the meek and mild. The affected, with the loss of their culture and language, fall into a vacuum, suffering from an identity crisis. They become alienated from and in themselves. Some may take it as a harmless outcome of the spontaneous interaction between multifarious cultural and linguistic imperialism or aggression.

Globalization has taught the world corporate trickery. The West is the breeding ground of big corporate scandals. Corporate culture seeks to influence the government machinery through fraudulence and corruption for the interest of the vested quarters, the bourgeoisie. It promotes the motto of maximizing profit, by means fair or foul. It suggests a heartless handling of business affairs, where human life carries no value. Life becomes mere a commodity. Money stands at the centre of all activities. Everybody runs after money when money itself is stationary. It flows to the people who have already got enough; it is not meant for the penniless, the subaltern, the marginalized.

Bangladesh will face a great threat to cultural autonomy unless pragmatic steps are taken to resist the silent cultural aggression which loomed large before the nation. There is need for the younger generation to understand and appreciate Bangladesh's cultural heritage and it is the responsibility of the older generation to ensure this continuity of culture. Cultural aggression is multi-faceted. Its machination range from distorting history to changing the way people dress. People even change from simple ways of address and greeting. In this connection I like to quote the remarks of some eminent personalities of our country made in a seminar on "Protecting Bangladesh's Cultural Identity", so as to realize the nature of cultural domination by the neighboring country upon us:

Eminent economist Prof. Mahabub Ullah said. "There has been a dehumanization of our culture resulting in horrific crimes like murder committed by the younger generation. On Pahela Baishakh, processions are brought out with models of peacocks, the national bird of India.  What is wrong with our national bird doel? This was not a part of our culture. This is not the Bangladesh we sacrificed our youth for." Political analyst Dilara Chowdhury said, "The blatant effect of cultural intrusion is the impact of Indian TV channels, especially on children. They are not only imbibing Indian culture, but also the uncultured side of Indian culture in clothes, language, habits etc. This is having a negative influence on our country and nation. We do not call for ban on Indian TV, but some restrictions."

Asma Abbasi, an academic and cultural personality said, "We no longer sing our traditional songs at weddings, but dance to Hindi film numbers. I was on the film censor board and we were quite strict about censorship. But what is the use? The things they show on the Indian channels are much worse. Look at our education, syllabus etc. It does not reflect our culture. They highlight various Indian characters, but no mention of the life of our Prophet (SAW). Let us not forget, our culture is not just Pahela Baishakh, but Shab-e-Meraj also."

Singer Arif Akbar said, "We rush to India for our recordings, but do not try to create more musicians and build up the industry here. Second grade Indian Idol singers come here for concerts and the multinationals rush to sponsor their programs. The media splashed huge pictures and reports about them."

Hasanuzzaman, Secretary General of Nandonik Natya Sampradaya said, "The country has become independent, but its cultural growth has been hampered. Everything has been politicized, even culture. We speak of enhancing cultural ties, but what has happened? It is a one-way road –Indian cultural aggression is obvious from the fact that Indian TV channels flood our TV screens, but our programs are not shown in India. Bangladesh TV channels are seen all over the world, in America, England, and Australia and in many other countries, but not in our closest neighboring country India."

Mahfuzullah, senior journalist and TV personality said, "Unless strength is garnered immediately to resist the silent aggression aimed at Bangladesh's culture, the culture of this country will lose its cultural autonomy. The older generation has failed to inspire the younger generation to promote and nurture national culture. Cultural aggression is multifaceted. Its machinations range from distorting history to changing the way people dress. People even change from simple ways of address and greeting. That's why today we see TV anchors faltering over saying, 'Allah Hafez' or 'Khuda Hafez' at the end of a program. The unique culture of Bangladesh which emerged after independence must be protected. We must be ever alert so that no alien or foreign culture swallows it."

Sadeq Khan, a senior journalist said, "Whatever entertainment and activities we may get involved in; at the end of the day the people go to the mosque. This is a significant statement in the context of our culture. We must actively endeavor to promote and protect our culture and heritage from outside incursions."

Ours is a young country and though slow, is still going through a phase of transition. Much is left unexplored, day to day discoveries in the country baffle us, and the waging wars between the powerful and the weak is an everyday issue. In fact, Bangladesh represents Darwin's quintessential concept of 'survival of the fittest.' The transition and discoveries in Bangladesh have always been flanked by the forever effort to protect our culture from foreign infiltration. In fact, the war against Pakistani military junta which was fought four decades ago, was not only to liberate our land and preserve our mother tongue, but was also an effort to safeguard our culture. The media, around the world, seems to be all bent on forcing children into adulthood to wear grownup clothes, talk like them, behave like them and even think like them. It is about time we let Children be just what they are supposed to be, children. We must stand on our own feet. We must preserve our own culture, identity and heritage. We must learn to borrow good things from other and reject all the bad things. We must love our culture, identity and autonomy. In this connection I like to mention one event to find solution of our existing cultural problem. Once an old man went to an experienced doctor and said, "Doctor! I do not see well with my eyes." The doctor said, "It is because of your old age." Then the old man said, "I also feel pain in my waist." The doctor said, "It is also due to your old age." The old man said. "When I walk on foot, I can not breathe well." The doctor again said, "Your old age is responsible for it."

The old man said. "My memory had become very weak. I can not remember anything." The doctor said, "It happens due to your old age." Then the old man became very angry and said, "Oh foolish doctor! Did you not study anything other than old age in your medical science?" The doctor said, "You have become angry with an innocent doctor like me. This is also because of your old age." Similar is the case with our cultural crisis. Our cultural crisis has occurred due to only one reason- we are deviated from the true path of Islam. We are not following the teaching of the Holy Qur'an and Sunnah in our day-to-day life although we claim ourselves to be Muslims, the follower of Prophet Muhammad (SAW).We do not have 'Takwa' for Allah (SWT). We do not have true respect for the Prophet (SAW) and his ideals, we are not afraid of the Day of Judgment and for our endless life in the world hereafter. This implies the fact that solution to all sorts of cultural evils like excessive luxury, stupidity, audacity, drug addiction, sexual harassment, eve teasing, homo-sexualism, moral degradation, nudity etc. lies in Islam. Islam is the most practical religion. It is a complete code of life for all people irrespective of caste, creed, race, sex and religion of all the places of the world for all time to come. Needless to say, only the proper implementation of Islamic way of life can establish everlasting peace and happiness in Bangladesh through preservation of decent culture and noble heritage of our people. The government and all the institutions concerned have a vital role to play to do the needful in this regard.

(The writer is a Professor, Department of Economics, and Chittagong University)He can be reached at <amchycu@yahoo.com>

http://www.perspectivebd.com/yellow-culture-intrudes-in-bangladesh/



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Use of 'bismillah' in the Constitution is Blasphemous!-- it is false--Muslim states must show their full identity in the constitution



Please read the following which will clarify the matter-------

 

A journalist asked me what is the need for including Islamic provisions in the constitution. He asked me this question because the present crisis and turmoil  in Bangladesh are for essentially two issues, deleting the provision that Faith in Almighty Allah is the basis of the actions of the state  and deleting the provisions of caretaker neutral government for holding Parliamentary election.

 

I answered that the issue was not so important when there were no written constitutions. In Mughal, Umayyad, Abbasid, Usmani rule Muslims took it as granted that Islam was the basis of law of the country despite other failings. There was not then  so much questions of writing Islamic basis of the state  in any document.

However, with the emergence of written constitutions, when all important things are written in the constitution, Islamic scholars and Muslim masses wanted  that Islam’s proper position should be included in the constitution.

 

This can be expressed in various ways. One way is to declare the  state as an Islamic state and that  the law shall be based on the Quran and Sunnah.Another way is to write Islam as the state religion and making The Quran and Sunnah as the main source of legislation.

Third way is to declare sovereignty belongs to Almighty Allah and declaring that laws should be based on Islam.Fourh way is what was done by fifth amendment , that is declare Faith in Allah as a principle of state policy and declare that all actions of the state should be based on faith in Almighty Allah. There can be other ways.

 

I personally feel it is sophistry and bad logic to say that Islam is in our heart and we will act as Muslims and there is no need to mention any Islamic provision in the constitution.

 

Please share this with your friends.

 

Shah Abdul Hannan

 

PS.. Even if Martial Law introduces a good thing, this should not be changed. British government gave us modern democracy, we have not rejected that.Mughal rulers created many waqfs, we did not change the status

 

Farida Majid’s knowledge of Islam is poor and she uses it only against all Islamic aspirations of Muslims

 

Shah Abdul Hannan

 

 


From: alochona@yahoogroups.com [mailto:alochona@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Aziz Huq
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 11:09 PM
To: alochona alochona
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] Use of 'bismillah' in the Constitution is Blasphemous!

 

 

Knowledge in Islamic faith is characterized by not only knowledge but activism and spirituality. Any person lacking a single facet of these requirements can be said to have limited knowledge.  

 

A true knowledgeable person is known only to the Creator. But we, human beings are given limited knowledge, sufficient enough to determine who is the right person to learn from and follow.

 

Some characteristics of the person of knowledge is his/her immense fear of Allah and His punishment in the Hereafter and love for Him and His Prophet (SWS). Which manifest itself in the use of decent language, modesty, tolerance, moderation, standing up for justice, taking care of the creations (men and animal) of the Creator.

 

When a person uses rough language to have dialogue with opponents, attacks Islamic values like modesty (Hijab), social activism (political participation), and the concept of brotherhood (or sisterhood) in terms of being critical of any or all Islamic entities just to name a few then there is serious question of that person’s having Islamic knowledge.

 

My response will be understood exactly as one understands the issue at hand so it is quite useless to delve into hair-splitting discussions.

 

Based on the above criterion one can easily find which political party, intellectual or a common person stands for what.

 

Aziz Huq  

June 12, 2011

 
 


To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: farida_majid@hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:28:24 -0400
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] Use of 'bismillah' in the Constitution is Blasphemous!

 

         Mr. Aziz Huq wrote about my plea to the Parliament for the removal of 'bismillah' from the Preamble in the Constitution of Bangladesh:
       
  "Couching personal  political opinion with limited knoledge".
 
      My response:
 
              Rabbi zidnee ailmaa
 
    Even illiterates, semiliterates, schoolgoing children, garments'er meye, sabziwalla, rickshawalla, bricklayers, smithies, peasant men and women, fishermen and women, and all the other people of "limited knowledge" in this nation know that invoking Allah's name for the purpose of falsification, for the pupose of fooling others and to hide a deceitful, illegal act is kufri and charom gonahgari kaj.
 
        Putting 'bismillah' in the Constitution of Bangladesh by a Martial Law ordinance promulgated by the wish of a single ruthless Military Dictator was done with an evil political purpose, not because he was some kind of a devout religious preacher who had no better idea about the people's War of Independence in 1971. The Constitution of Bangladesh is meant to guarantee fundamental rights to EVERY citizen. It is not a place for the State to advertise the preference of one religion over all the other religions or ethnicity of non-Muslim inhabitants of the state. It is ironic that this was done under the supposed aegis of Islam, a religion known for its keen sense of equal justice for all. Besides Qur'anic guidance, we have the Sunnah to give us models to follow.
 
      Vandalisation of the Constitution is akin to condoning the Genocide of 1971, or the mass murder of civilians and fellow citizens who fought to oppose the oppression of a State (Pakistan) created in 1947 on the false premise that Muslims cannot live peacefully with people of other religions or ethnicity.
 
            Rabbi zidnee ailmaa
 
         And if Allah sub hana t'ala very kndly granted me greater knowledge than what I have now, would I have "impersonal political opinion" as opposed to having my personal political opinion? 
        
          What am I couching my personal political opinion in? Hope Mr. Aziz Huq will oblige with an answer in his infinite wisdom. 

               Rabbi zidnee ailmaa
 
                 Farida Majid
                


To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: azizhuq@hotmail.com
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:14:18 +0000
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] Use of 'bismillah' in the Constitution is Blasphemous!

 

Wow! Couching personal  political opinion with limited knoledge.
 


From: farida_majid@hotmail.com
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:26:55 -0400
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Use of 'bismillah' in the Constitution is Blasphemous!

 

Use of ‘bismillah’ in the Constitution is Blasphemous!

 

                     Farida Majid

 

           Sentimental objection against removal of "bismillah"s  placement in the Constitution of Bangladesh has begun just as I apprehended.  This is a familiar trick reminiscent of Hitler's campaign rhetoric stoking popular racial and ethnic sentiments in 1930s Germany. Later the Catholic Church of Austria used religious sentiments to persecute the Jews and oust them from Vienna. The lesson to be learned is that the word of God, when politically manipulated, can bring massive human destruction. The Genocide of 1971 is scorched in our memory.

 

         When I raised the issue of illegally placed “bismillah” above the Preamble of the Constitution of Bangladesh in the internet forums, I got angry responses. Accused of being anti-Islam and a paid servant of Zionist masters, I was asked: “Why "Bismillah" is a problem for you?”

 

          ‘Bismillah’ is not a problem for me.  It is a constant and trusted companion. Besides using it in prayers, I love saying it at the commencement of any good work, and I love writing it.  Give me a minute or two, and any old pen, and even without practice, I will write ‘bismillah’ in Arabic in passable Nashtaliq calligraphic style.

 

          I do have a problem though with a thing called Martial Law. There is no such thing called ‘Martial Law’ in the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.  ‘Bismillah’ should not be put above the Preamble of the nation’s Constitution by an unlawful usurper of civilian power who called himself Chief Martial Law Administrator.   The use of ‘bismillah’ for such crass political purpose behind the clout of illegal Martial Law by a Proclamation Order in 1977, thereby betraying the trust of 150 million people should surely count as the most shocking and egregious blasphemy! It is pure kufri!

 

          See the Holy Qur’an for a strong interdiction against invoking Allah's name in an unlawful act like this in Sura Hud (11: 18):

 

 Waman athlamu mimmani iftara AAala Allahi kathiban ola-ika yuAAradhoona AAala rabbihim wayaqoolu al-ashhadu haola-i allatheena kathaboo AAala rabbihim ala laAAnatu Allahi AAala alththalimeena

 

And who (is) more unjust/oppressive than who fabricated/cut and split on God lies/denials/falsifications? Those, they are being displayed/exhibited/shown on (to) their Lord, and the witnesses/testifiers (the angels) say: "Those (are) those who lied/denied/falsified upon their Lord." Is not God's curse/torture on the unjust/oppressors?  …11:18

 

           Anything that bears the sign of preference for one particular religion, be it the religion of a large number of natives, is debris from the illegal acts of constitutional vandalism. Surely it is blasphemous to use the hallowed name of Allah as a mark to legitimize such an act of unjust vandalism. By upholding the welcome repeal of the Fifth Amendment, Act 1979, the Supreme Court has fulfilled the duty of the judiciary in the service of preserving and defending the Constitution of Bangladesh. Now it seems that a Parliamentary process should be put in place to remove this heinous blasphemy and restore the sanctity of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

 

            Independence from the British rule, and then from Pakistan’s oppression, must mean freedom from the dreadful colonial practice of categorization of people and computation of demography by the professed faith of a person or a group.  Counting people by their religions means everyone is forced into a pre-selected classification that ignores other principles of grouping. We must stop the practice of depicting majority/minority on the basis of religion alone.

 

           The Parliament should do its part to fulfill the obligation of preserving and protecting the Constitution that represents our valiant fight for independence from a false statehood (Pakistan) whose existential basis was this weird notion of computation of people by their religion.  Pakistan was a disasterous experiment in a bad idea!  The birth of Bangladesh in 1971 proved conclusively that Muslim Bengalis do not need a separate state as Muslims only and no one else.  They can live with people of other religions and ethnicity as they have happily and prosperously done so for centuries.

 

                                                                                                                               ©2011, Farida Majid

 

 

 

 

 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___