Banner Advertiser

Saturday, July 20, 2013

[mukto-mona] আমি চিরকাল রাজাকারের প্রেমের কাঙ্গাল ____ ফালুদা আজম !!!!!



মাউলানা সফির সেই "তেতুল" তত্ত্ব এখানে কি কাজ করে না বা করবে না!"তেতুল" তত্ত্ব যদি এখানে কাজ করে, তাহলে উনাদের কি রোজা হবে???

সেলুকাস, কী বিচিত্র এই দেশের মাউলানারা !
সেলুকাস, কী বিচিত্র আমাদের বোকা জনগণ!
সেলুকাস, কী বিচিত্র এই দেশের সাংবাদিকতা!
সেলুকাস, কী বিচিত্র আমাদের মূর্খা, লোভী এবং মেরুদন্ড হীন মিডিয়া!
আমি চিরকাল রাজাকারের প্রেমের কাঙ্গাল ____ ফালুদা   আজম     http://bangla.bdnews24.com/politics/article649407.bdnews
আমি চিরকাল রাজাকারের প্রেমের কাঙ্গাল ____ ফালুদা আজম 


__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] Fw: [Bangladesh-Zindabad] জিয়াউর রহমান ছিলেন রাজাকারদের দ্বিতীয় পিতা : তথ্যমন্ত্রী




----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Gonojagoron Moncho <projonmochottar@gmail.com>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 11:12 PM
Subject: [Bangladesh-Zindabad] জিয়াউর রহমান ছিলেন রাজাকারদের দ্বিতীয় পিতা : তথ্যমন্ত্রী

 
ঢাকা : জাতীয় সমাজতান্ত্রিক দল-জাসদের সভাপতি ও তথ্যমন্ত্রী হাসানুল হক ইনু বলেছেন, তাহেরকে হত্যা করে জিয়াউর রহমান সাম্প্রদায়িকতার বিষবৃক্ষ রোপণ করেন এবং ক্যান্টনমেন্টকে তিনি কসাইখানা বানিয়ে ছিলেন। আজ শুক্রবার ইঞ্জিনিয়ার্স ইনিষ্টিটিউশন মিলনায়তনে কর্নেল তাহের বীর উত্তমের মৃত্যু বার্ষিকী উপলক্ষে জাসদ আয়োজিত 'মুক্তিযুদ্ধের চেতনা ধ্বংসকারী, যুদ্ধাপরাধী, জঙ্গিবাদী সাম্প্রদায়িক অপশক্তির বিরুদ্ধে রুখে দাঁড়াও' শীর্ষক আলোচনা সভায় সভাপতির বক্তব্যে তিনি এ কথা বলেন।
HasanulHaqInu
হাসানুল হক ইনু বলেন, কর্নেল তাহের হত্যাকারী মরহুম জিয়াউর রহমান ছিলেন রাজাকারদের দ্বিতীয় পিতা। বেগম খালেদা জিয়া তাদের লালন-পালনকারী মাতা আর গোলাম আযম ছিলেন রাজাকারদের শিরোমনি।তিনি বলেন, জাতির পিতা বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমান ও কর্নেল তাহেরকে হত্যা করা যায় কিন্তু সমগ্র জাতিকে হত্যা করা যায় না। কর্নেল তাহের কারো কাছে মাথানত করেনি। তিনি একজন সাহসী যোদ্ধা ছিলেন। অনুষ্ঠানে আরও বক্তব্য রাখেন জাসদের সাধারণ সম্পাদক নুরুল শরীফ আম্বিয়া, ওয়ার্কার্স পার্টির সভাপতি রাশেদ খান মেনন এমপি, কমিউনিস্ট পার্টির সভাপতি মুজাহিদুল ইসলাম সেলিম, কর্নেল তাহেরের স্ত্রী লুৎফা তাহের, তাহেরের ছোট ভাই অধ্যাপক ড. আনোয়ার হোসেন, মেজর (অব.) জিয়াউদ্দিন আহমেদ, সাম্প্রদায়িকতা-জঙ্গিবাদ বিরোধী মঞ্চের আহ্বায়ক অজয় রায়, গণতান্ত্রিক পার্টির সাধারণ সম্পাদক নুরুর রহমান সেলিম, সাংবাদিক আবু সাঈদ খান, জাতীয় মহিলা জোটের সভানেত্রী আফরোজা হক রিনা, শ্রমিক জোটের সভানেত্রী শিরিন আখতার, মহানগর জাসদের সমন্বয়ক মীর আখতার হোসেন প্রমুখ।
হাসানুল হক ইনু বলেন, জামায়াতকে মাঠে না পেয়ে বেগম খালেদা জিয়া এখন হেফাজতকে মাঠে নামিয়েছে। হেফাজতের আমির এখন 'তেতুল তত্ত্ব' দিয়ে নারী ও পুরষদের বিরুদ্ধে কুৎসা রটনায় উঠে পড়ে লেগেছে।তিনি বলেন, আদালতের রায়ে ৩৭ বছর পর জিয়া হয়েছেন ঠান্ডা মাথার খুনী আর তাহের হয়েছেন দেশপ্রেমিক। মিথ্যা দু'একদিনের জন্য চলে। কিন্তু সত্য আলোর মতো উদ্ভাসিত হয়। রাশেদ খান মেনন বলেন, অনেক মুক্তিযোদ্ধার নামে শহরে রাস্তাঘাটের নামকরণ করা হয় অথচ একজন বীর মুক্তিযোদ্ধা তাহেরের নামে একটি রাস্তারও নামকরণ করা হয়নি।মুজাহিদুল ইসলাম সেলিম বলেন, এখন আর তাহেরকে শুধুমাত্র কর্নেল তাহের নয় 'কমরেড' তাহের নামে অভিহিত করতে হবে। কারণ তিনি আমাদের একই আদর্শে বিশ্বাস করতেন।
- See more at: http://www.khabor.com/?p=4648#sthash.wkGLtdr2.dpuf




__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [mukto-mona] Freedom of speech when faced with tyrannical expression



Mr.Jiten Roy,


I was really shocked to hear the verdict on Golam Azan as he is the mastermind behind all organized killing and bangaleee annihilations done in 1971. He was given 90 years jail instead of capital punishment , with preference to  his older ages. In 1971, we were attacked by Golam Azam's gangs who believe in Islam and we were then protected by the same community in 1971. Problem lies with the teaching of religion. That is why I mentioned some name of person bearing the same community who really showed us human behaviour as I behave to human beings in every time.

We got our independence with a short period of time.  After liberation , allies of Golam Azam were given protection by the freedom fighters, either from the blood relation  or in exchange of  material benefit. And at the same time , Tajuddin , second in command of Bangabandhu was politically kept inactive. Tajuddin, if in active in politics,  can align party with a secular characteristics.   Party did not take proper measure to abolish culturally  communal  forces inside the  party   and some acts of party instead helped them to flourish. I know Awami league internally, when Awamai league in power , two will be given preferences, one is Madrasha and another one is army. And end result of Madrasha is to strengthen the hand of Jamat or Hepajot.  Awami league will not get single vote from them. Mosque and Military have no good example for our secular politics.

Please read the link:

http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=13&dd=2013-07-19&ni=142816


http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=13&dd=2013-07-20&ni=142952


http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=16&dd=2013-07-21&ni=143075


All problems lies with the hypocrisy of Awami league leadership.  This is the dual nature of Awami league's leadership to dig their own graves many times in history. Personally I know them that some of my friends know me. I might not be good narrator so you and some readers might be confused. I believe in compassion and loving kindness and try to defend truth in every time without considering colours, race and religions. I am not coward , and only coward can hide their own name and only clandestine mindset can have doubt to others.

Intellect without wisdom is curse.


Best regards to you.


Asoke Bose 



To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
From: jnrsr53@yahoo.com
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 18:56:54 -0700
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Freedom of speech when faced with tyrannical expression

 

Mr. Bose,

The problem is that - most of us do not understand your sarcasm. You are still a mystery to me. Your viewpoints contain conflicting thoughts.
For example, when you were talking about Golam Azam, you were also talking about a Muslim family, who sheltered your family during the war. These two thoughts should not appear together. Such talks will only confuse readers. I still do not know your position on Golam Azam, and his verdict.

You should know that tyrannical expressions are defended by freedom of speech.

Jiten Roy




From: Asoke Bose <anjbose@hotmail.com>
To: "khabor@yahoogroups.com" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: Shafikur <srbanunz@gmail.com>; "akhtarudduza@gmail.com" <akhtarudduza@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 7:30 PM
Subject: [mukto-mona] Freedom of speech when faced with tyrannical expression

 

As I understand that we are using free thinking forum where expression will be vibrant and talk will be full of humour or very serious or sarcastic. When we find  forceful and tyrannical attitude among us then it is very nice to say the person to use your tyrannical weapon and abolish the free thinker. As we have seen the democracies have long grappled with the issue of the limits, if any, to place on the expression of ideas and beliefs. The dilemma dates back at least to ancient Greece, when the Athenians, who cherished individual freedom, nevertheless prosecuted Socrates for his teachings, claiming that he had corrupted young people and insulted the gods. I am very little in compare to great Socrates.


Quote :"Freedom of speech is the political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas using one's body and property to anyone who is willing to receive them. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, as with libel, slander, obscenity, sedition (including, for example inciting ethnic hatred), copyright violation, revelation of information that is classified or otherwise."





__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Freedom of speech when faced with tyrannical expression



Mr. Bose,

The problem is that - most of us do not understand your sarcasm. You are still a mystery to me. Your viewpoints contain conflicting thoughts.
For example, when you were talking about Golam Azam, you were also talking about a Muslim family, who sheltered your family during the war. These two thoughts should not appear together. Such talks will only confuse readers. I still do not know your position on Golam Azam, and his verdict.

You should know that tyrannical expressions are defended by freedom of speech.

Jiten Roy




From: Asoke Bose <anjbose@hotmail.com>
To: "khabor@yahoogroups.com" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: Shafikur <srbanunz@gmail.com>; "akhtarudduza@gmail.com" <akhtarudduza@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 7:30 PM
Subject: [mukto-mona] Freedom of speech when faced with tyrannical expression

 

As I understand that we are using free thinking forum where expression will be vibrant and talk will be full of humour or very serious or sarcastic. When we find  forceful and tyrannical attitude among us then it is very nice to say the person to use your tyrannical weapon and abolish the free thinker. As we have seen the democracies have long grappled with the issue of the limits, if any, to place on the expression of ideas and beliefs. The dilemma dates back at least to ancient Greece, when the Athenians, who cherished individual freedom, nevertheless prosecuted Socrates for his teachings, claiming that he had corrupted young people and insulted the gods. I am very little in compare to great Socrates.


Quote :"Freedom of speech is the political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas using one's body and property to anyone who is willing to receive them. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, as with libel, slander, obscenity, sedition (including, for example inciting ethnic hatred), copyright violation, revelation of information that is classified or otherwise."




__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!



Ironically, the name Gholam perfectly fits for his lifelong fight for Paki gholami (slavery). Maybe, Saudis have saved his neck this time?
-SD

 
"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss



From: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!

 
As a criminal Gholam Azam is comparable to his guru Mowdudi who was given death sentence for instigating communal riots against the Ahmadias. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 19, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Shah Deeldar <shahdeeldar@yahoo.com> wrote:

 
You should read your first post and think through how it should be perceived by readers? If I am not mistaken, it felt like you tried to justify Azam's crimes with our politicians' behavior and Taj being sidelined during Mujib's time. In addition, we did not prolong our struggle little longer to get rid of our political weeds? OK, if that was not your intention, that is truly great. Thank you.

So, why talk about the nature of the crimes? How that relates to your first post?

-SD



 
"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss



From: Asoke Bose <anjbose@hotmail.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>; "khabor@yahoogroups.com" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: Shafikur <srbanunz@gmail.com>; "akhtarudduza@gmail.com" <akhtarudduza@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 8:22 PM
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!

 
Please do not relate crime of Golam Azam and his allies with other criminals as two are opposite in  nature. Please try to understand the fundamental differences between these two concept of crimes.  
 
Crime of Golam Azam and his followers fall under this category:
 
In 1945, the United States and other Allies developed the Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis and Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT), sitting at Nuremberg, which contained the following definition of crimes against humanity in Article 6(c):
 
"Crimes against humanity: murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against civilian populations, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated."
 
Golam Azam and his allies did the above mentioned crimes in 1971.
 
Crime as we are noticing in a society falls under the following category:
 
Legally, crimes usually are defined as acts or omissions forbidden by law that can
be punished by imprisonment and/or fine. Murder, robbery, burglary, rape, drunken driving, child neglect, and failure to pay your taxes all are common examples. This conception of crime explains the wide variety of criminal activity and the fact
that individuals tend not to specialize in one type of crime. It also is consistent with the
well-established tendency of people to be consistent over long periods of time in the frequency and severity of crimes they commit. Even executives who commit white collar crimes probably are more impulsive, self-centred, and indifferent to the suffering of others than those who do not take advantage of similar opportunities.
 
N:B: I have source for above mentioned writings.

Asoke


To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com; khabor@yahoogroups.com
CC: akhtarudduza@gmail.com; srbanunz@gmail.com; bangladesh-progressives@googlegroups.com
From: shahdeeldar@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:13:44 -0700
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!

 

Point taken and yet, I think you should not justify Ghulam Azam's criminality because Awamis and BNP cadres have been behaving very poorly. The old habit would not go away that easily. Even, a prolonged struggle would not have created a perfect harmonious society as evidenced by other countries' freedom struggles. That is a pure illusion. We have a religious fault line that has been apparent for long time and it is not going to go away any time soon. If that was not there, people would have invented something different like Shia-Sunni problem. That is our damn nature!
-SD
 
"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss



From: Asoke Bose <anjbose@hotmail.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>; "khabor@yahoogroups.com" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: "akhtarudduza@gmail.com" <akhtarudduza@gmail.com>; Shafikur <srbanunz@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:57 PM
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!

 
I appreciate all of our respected friends who had given valued comments regarding my notorious caption. My caption has explanatory sign and  in my comments I mentioned under Golam Azam's guidance, Pakistani army launched genocide against us in 1971. I lost my brother for this cause. In no way I do not expect  Golam Azam,  for his age consideration got special preference from judiciary.
I do not want my reader's confusion with regard to my caption and in no way I can give a praiseworthy applause from my heart to Golam Azam ,a notorious culprits in our time.
Regards to all.
Asoke Bose   


To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
CC: bangladesh-progressives@googlegroups.com
From: shahdeeldar@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:41:16 -0700
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!

 

The man is not only misguided but totally demented to justify a massive genocide in the name of pure Muslim blood. No, it was not a racial cleansing, it was a genocide with ethnic cleansing. And, that is considered as a crime against humanity. Can anybody show this @ss the door?
-SD

 
"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss



From: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!

 

Mr. Bose is severely misguided in his reasoning. I am not sure how he could up with a conclusion that Golam Azam did not do anything wrong even after he has been found guilty of all heinous charges. In my view, Golam Azam is still causing death and destruction every day as people keep on dying on the street in protest of his verdict.
 
I can understand political deal between Awami League and Jamati leaders, which may save some  convicted Jamati leaders' lives. What I can't understand is - why all those fools are dying every day on the street, fighting one another. What are they achieving with their ultimate sacrifice? They are saving lives of some convicted killers at the cost of their own lives. Does that make sense to anyone? These are the dumbest fools in the society, always ready to be exploited.




__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Pakistani clerics ban women from shopping alone in northwest area



I would not be surprised to see chastity belts being introduced in Pakistan to keep the women holy and clean?
-SD

 
"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss



From: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 7:17 PM
Subject: [mukto-mona] Pakistani clerics ban women from shopping alone in northwest area

 

"
Police are supporting the ban, announced over mosque loudspeakers on Friday in Karak district in the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, district police official Fazal Hanif told Reuters.
Unaccompanied women will be arrested and shopkeepers may be punished for selling items to women on their own."

Islamists are the king of the hill in Pakistan. This is  a sad story!
 
_________________________________________________________________________________________

  • Like
  • Dislike
Reuters
Saud Mehsud 9 hours ago SocietyReligion
By Saud Mehsud

DERA ISMAIL KHAN, Pakistan (Reuters) - Clerics in northwest Pakistan have issued a temporary ban on women shopping unless accompanied by a male relative, a police official said on Saturday, in a step designed to keep men from being distracted during the holy month of Ramadan.
Police are supporting the ban, announced over mosque loudspeakers on Friday in Karak district in the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, district police official Fazal Hanif told Reuters.
Unaccompanied women will be arrested and shopkeepers may be punished for selling items to women on their own.
One trader said he feared the ban would affect business and damage the region's reputation.
"We never supported this ban and convened a meeting on Wednesday to protest over the clerics' decision," Munwar Khan, one of the merchants in the region, told Reuters.
Vast swathes of rural Pakistan, whose name means "Land of the Pure", are deeply conservative. Thousands of women have been killed in recent years for behavior their families considered improper.
The mosque announcements said the ban was intended to stop men from being distracted during Ramadan, when Muslims are meant to fast from dawn to sunset. The annual period of fasting and prayer falls in July this year.
The ban was proposed by a faction of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam party led by Fazl-ur-Rehman, local administration official Sarfaraz Khattak said.
Such religious parties have typically performed poorly in Pakistani elections, winning only a handful of seats. But mainstream politicians are often slow to criticize religious leaders, partly for fear of being targeted by their supporters.
Some residents of the area also oppose the ban.
"The male members of the family don't have enough time to take women to the market," said Mohammad Naeem Khattak. "Where can women go for shopping if they are banned in the market?"
(Additional reporting by Jibran Ahmad in Peshawar; Writing by Katharine Houreld; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)




__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] Freedom of speech when faced with tyrannical expression




As I understand that we are using free thinking forum where expression will be vibrant and talk will be full of humour or very serious or sarcastic. When we find  forceful and tyrannical attitude among us then it is very nice to say the person to use your tyrannical weapon and abolish the free thinker. As we have seen the democracies have long grappled with the issue of the limits, if any, to place on the expression of ideas and beliefs. The dilemma dates back at least to ancient Greece, when the Athenians, who cherished individual freedom, nevertheless prosecuted Socrates for his teachings, claiming that he had corrupted young people and insulted the gods. I am very little in compare to great Socrates.



Quote :"Freedom of speech is the political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas using one's body and property to anyone who is willing to receive them. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, as with libel, slander, obscenity, sedition (including, for example inciting ethnic hatred), copyright violation, revelation of information that is classified or otherwise."



__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___