I am not asking him to alter anything except to look more presidential. But he simply makes one mistake after another. Was there any need for him to tell Hillary that she is a nasty woman? How that helps his straight talking strategy at this stage? He would need people' votes not praise for his masculinity.
From: "Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] 2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election
__._,_.___
Posted by: Shah Deeldar <shahdeeldar@yahoo.com>
****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration:
Call For Articles:
http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68
http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585
****************************************************
VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/
****************************************************
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
-Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190
On Saturday, October 29, 2016 12:47 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Deeldar: "Straight speaking is good during the primaries but not as a nominee. The man broke the rule."
As a conventional political strategy, this notion may be right. Trump has exposed this age-old double-talk professional political strategy, and brought back straight-talk as his brand, which propelled him to where he is today. That brand is precious for him.
Trump gained 10 points in a week in the national poll, taken before the latest news of the revival of old FBI investigation against Hillary Clinton. He is now only 2 points behind, which shows - he is winning with his straight-talk brand.
People are tired of double-talking professional politicians.
You may ask, why he is not 10 points ahead? This is where Media comes in. He is facing biased hostile establishment media, which is interested in their bottom line, and status quo is good for them. So, Trump is not their candidate. Naturally, they are much more interested in his negative than positive points. That's why - it has been very difficult for him to put his brand messages to the ordinary people.
If he alters his brand now, and starts to talk like professional politicians, he will fall back 10 points again in a week.
Jiten Roy
Jiten Roy
From: "Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] 2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election
Duplicity is her only and best strategy! But left/moderates will swallow and go for her. Trump needs no enemies when republicans and women are abandoning him in a mass. Straight speaking is good during the primaries but not as a nominee. The man broke the rule. Only a miracle can save him from defeat. This will facilitate next Bush or Rubio to win in 2020?
On Saturday, October 29, 2016 9:51 AM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
http://observer.com/2016/10/2006-audio-emerges-of-hillary-clinton-proposing-rigging-palestine-election/
2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election
Unearthed tape: 'We should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win'
By Ken Kurson • 10/28/16 1:00pm
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebookShare to TwitterTwitterShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to Google+Google+Share to EmailEmail
<img class="size-large wp-image-860436" src="https://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/gettyimages-615701930.jpg?quality=80&w=635" alt="Hillary Clinton listens to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speak during the third U.S. presidential debate at the Thomas & Mack Center on October 19, 2016 in Las Vegas, Nevada. " width="635" height="385" title="2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election" srcset="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/gettyimages-615701930.jpg?quality=80&w=635 635w, http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/gettyimages-615701930.jpg?quality=80&w=1270 1270w, http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/gettyimages-615701930.jpg?quality=80&w=300 300w, http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/gettyimages-615701930.jpg?quality=80&w=768 768w" sizes="(max-width: 635px) 100vw, 635px" />
Hillary Clinton listens to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speak during the third U.S. presidential debate at the Thomas & Mack Center on October 19, 2016 in Las Vegas, Nevada. - Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images
On September 5, 2006, Eli Chomsky was an editor and staff writer for the Jewish Press, and Hillary Clinton was running for a shoo-in re-election as a U.S. senator. Her trip making the rounds of editorial boards brought her to Brooklyn to meet the editorial board of the Jewish Press.
The tape was never released and has only been heard by the small handful of Jewish Press staffers in the room. According to Chomsky, his old-school audiocassette is the only existent copy and no one has heard it since 2006, until today when he played it for the Observer.
The tape is 45 minutes and contains much that is no longer relevant, such as analysis of the re-election battle that Sen. Joe Lieberman was then facing in Connecticut. But a seemingly throwaway remark about elections in areas controlled by the Palestinian Authority has taken on new relevance amid persistent accusations in the presidential campaign by Clinton's Republican opponent Donald Trump that the current election is "rigged."
ADVERTISING
Speaking to the Jewish Press about the January 25, 2006, election for the second Palestinian Legislative Council (the legislature of the Palestinian National Authority), Clinton weighed in about the result, which was a resounding victory for Hamas (74 seats) over the U.S.-preferred Fatah (45 seats).
"I do not think we should have pushed for an election in the Palestinian territories. I think that was a big mistake," said Sen. Clinton. "And if we were going to push for an election, then we should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win."
Chomsky recalls being taken aback that "anyone could support the idea—offered by a national political leader, no less—that the U.S. should be in the business of fixing foreign elections."
Some eyebrows were also raised when then-Senator Clinton appeared to make a questionable moral equivalency.
<img class="wp-image-860443 size-medium" src="https://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/eli-chomsky.png?w=250&h=300" alt="Eli Chomsky participated in an interview with Hillary Clinton at the Jewish Press in 2006." width="250" height="300" title="2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election" srcset="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/eli-chomsky.png?w=250&h=300 250w, http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/eli-chomsky.png?w=500&h=600 500w" sizes="(max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px" />
Eli Chomsky, photographed today at the Observer offices, participated in an interview with Hillary Clinton at the Jewish Press in 2006. - Observer
Regarding capturing combatants in war—the June capture of IDF soldier Gilad Shalit by Hamas militants who came across the Gaza border via an underground tunnel was very much front of mind—Clinton can be heard on the tape saying, "And then, when, you know, Hamas, you know, sent the terrorists, you know, through the tunnel into Israel that killed and captured, you know, kidnapped the young Israeli soldier, you know, there's a sense of like, one-upsmanship, and in these cultures of, you know, well, if they captured a soldier, we've got to capture a soldier."
Equating Hamas, which to this day remains on the State Department's official list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, with the armed forces of a close American ally was not what many expected to hear in the Jewish Press editorial offices, which were then at Third Avenue and Third Street in Brooklyn. (The paper's office has since moved to the Boro Park section of Brooklyn.) The use of the phrase "these cultures" is also a bit of a head-scratcher.
According to Chomsky, Clinton was "gracious, personable and pleasant throughout" the interview, taking about an hour to speak to, in addition to himself, managing editor Jerry Greenwald, assistant to the publisher Naomi Klass Mauer, counsel Dennis Rapps and senior editor Jason Maoz.
Another part of the tape highlights something that was relatively uncontroversial at the time but has taken on new meaning in light of the current campaign—speaking to leaders with whom our country is not on the best terms. Clinton has presented a very tough front in discussing Russia, for example, accusing Trump of unseemly ardor for strongman Vladimir Putin and mocking his oft-stated prediction that as president he'd "get along" with Putin.
Chomsky is heard on the tape asking Clinton what now seems like a prescient question about Syria, given the disaster unfolding there and its looming threat to drag the U.S., Iran and Russia into confrontation.
"Do you think it's worth talking to Syria—both from the U.S. point [of view] and Israel's point [of view]?"
Clinton replied, "You know, I'm pretty much of the mind that I don't see what it hurts to talk to people. As long as you're not stupid and giving things away. I mean, we talked to the Soviet Union for 40 years. They invaded Hungary, they invaded Czechoslovakia, they persecuted the Jews, they invaded Afghanistan, they destabilized governments, they put missiles 90 miles from our shores, we never stopped talking to them," an answer that reflects her mastery of the facts but also reflects a willingness to talk to Russia that sounds more like Trump 2016 than Clinton 2016.
<img class="size-medium wp-image-860446" src="https://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/hillary-tape.jpg?quality=80&w=153" alt="This is how news used to be collected." width="153" height="300" title="2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election" srcset="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/hillary-tape.jpg?quality=80&w=153 153w, http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/hillary-tape.jpg?quality=80&w=306 306w" sizes="(max-width: 153px) 100vw, 153px" />
This is how news used to be collected. - Observer
Shortly after, she said, "But if you say, 'they're evil, we're good, [and] we're never dealing with them,' I think you give up a lot of the tools that you need to have in order to defeat them…So I would like to talk to you [the enemy] because I want to know more about you. Because if I want to defeat you, I've got to know something more about you. I need different tools to use in my campaign against you. That's my take on it."
A final bit of interest to the current campaign involves an articulation of phrases that Trump has accused Clinton of being reluctant to use. Discussing the need for a response to terrorism, Clinton said, "I think you can make the case that whether you call it 'Islamic terrorism' or 'Islamo-fascism,' whatever the label is we're going to give to this phenomenon, it's a threat. It's a global threat. To Europe, to Israel, to the United States…Therefore we need a global response. It's a global threat and it needs a global response. That can be the, sort of, statement of principle…So I think sometimes having the global vision is a help as long as you realize that underneath that global vision there's a lot of variety and differentiation that has to go on."
It's not clear what she means by a global vision with variety and differentiation, but what's quite clear is that the then-senator, just five years after her state was the epicenter of the September 11 attacks, was comfortable deploying the phrase "Islamic terrorism" and the even more strident "Islamo-fascism," at least when meeting with the editorial board of a Jewish newspaper.
In an interview before the Observer heard the tape, Chomsky told the Observer that Clinton made some "odd and controversial comments" on the tape. The irony of a decade-old recording emerging to feature a candidate making comments that are suddenly relevant to voters today was not lost on Chomsky, who wrote the original story at the time. Oddly enough, that story, headlined "Hillary Clinton on Israel, Iraq and Terror," is no longer available on jewishpress.com and even a short summary published on the Free Republic site offers a broken link that can no longer surface the story.
"I went to my bosses at the time," Chomsky told the Observer. "The Jewish Press had this mindset that they would not want to say anything offensive about anybody—even a direct quote from anyone—in a position of influence because they might need them down the road. My bosses didn't think it was newsworthy at the time. I was convinced that it was and I held onto it all these years."
Disclosure: Donald Trump is the father-in-law of Jared Kushner, publisher of Observer Media.
__._,_.___
Posted by: Shah Deeldar <shahdeeldar@yahoo.com>
****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration:
Call For Articles:
http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68
http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585
****************************************************
VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/
****************************************************
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
-Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190
__,_._,___
