Awami oppression |
__._,_.___
Unratified India And Tortured People By NM Salih 17 July, 2009 Former United States Attorney General, Ramsey Clark once said, 'A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from you'. But here things turn different, 'right is not something what we can give you; it will be taken from you', so is the state of affairs when it comes to the torture in police custody in India. In the wake June 26, which marked the International Day against torture, the Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR) released a report named 'Torture in India 2009', compiling the true facts of ill-treated human rights in India. This report has zeroed in on custodial tortures especially by the police, armed forces and armed opposition groups etc. It reveals several accounts of atrocities by the so called law enforcement officers from all over India. The panoptic narrative of deaths in the police custody with detailed state wise account of such incidents rules the roost in this report. This is based on a nation wide campaign against torture and the study of a plethora of cases of last eight years. From April 2001 to March 2009 an estimated 1,184 persons were killed in police custody in India. Overwhelmingly, most of the victims were killed as a result of torture within the first 48 hours after being taken into custody, so rampant are the police in handling the people in custody. Torture in police custody is a pervasive problem that predates this report. The State and the police remain in worrying denial. The annual reports, Crime in India, of the National Crime Records Bureau of the Ministry of Home Affairs that report very few deaths in police custody reflect this disturbing denial. The highest number of custodial deaths was reported in Maharashtra (192 cases) followed by Uttar Pradesh (128), Gujarat (113), Andhra Pradesh (85), West Bengal (83), Tamil Nadu (76), Assam (74), Karnataka (55), Punjab (41), Madhya Pradesh (38), Bihar and Rajasthan (32 each), Haryana (31), Kerala (30), Jharkhand (29), Delhi (25), Orissa (24), Chhattisgarh (23), Uttarakhand and Meghalaya (16 each), Arunachal Pradesh (11), Jammu and Kashmir and Tripura (9 each), Puducherry and Chandigarh (3 each), Himachal Pradesh (2) while Manipur, Goa, Sikkim, and Dadra & Nagar Haveli recorded one case each. National Crime Records Bureau's statistics says that over 31 persons died by committing suicide in police custody in 2007, 24 persons in 2006 and 30 persons in 2005. This report highlights that the National Human right commission has failed to effectively address torture and other human rights violation. According to a statement by Suhas Chakma, Director of ACHR, these deaths in custody do not however represent the actual number of deaths in police custody in India. A number of cases of custodial death taken up by ACHR with the National Human Rights Commission show that the NHRC was not informed by the police about these custodial deaths, while the NHRC has expressed its anguish against the failure to report these cases of custodial deaths but the NHRC's guidelines on reporting custodial deaths within 24 hours continue to be flouted. According to a senior lawyer, India has the highest number of cases of police torture and custodial deaths among the world's democracies and the weakest legislation against torture. Unfortunately, in the country, torture is seen as routine police behaviour to extract confessions. The case of 22 years old Md Qudus Ali from Urup, Imphal East district of Mnipur is a strange one. On 7 February 2008, he was allegedly tortured to death in the custody of state police commandos at Thambalkhong in Imphal East district. The victim was allegedly picked up from the premises of the Office of the District Commissioner, Imphal East where he had gone in connection with his electoral photo identity card. The police, however, claimed that the victim was a "militant" and that he was killed in an encounter. A large number of reported cases of torture and custodial death are a result of attempts to extract a confession relating to theft or other petty offences. This implies that suspects belonging to the lower economic and social strata are particularly vulnerable. The police routinely cite "suicide" as a cause of death in custody. In a reply to the Rajya Sabha on 12 March 2008, then Home Minister of India, Shivraj Patil cited suicide as one of the primary causes of custodial death. But the Home Minister failed to clarify as to why so many accused had committed suicide in police detention, what had led them to act in this manner and how they had accessed the means like knives, poisons and open electric cables etc as they are in custody. Suicide does of course occur. However, examination of number cases by ACHR suggests that the causes of deaths are often a cause for concern. There are frequent allegations by the families of the victims of torture; torture that either impacted the victims actions or resulted in a death that was subsequently covered up. The explanations of the police are also often inadequate. The police regularly claim that people have committed suicide by using handkerchiefs or by consuming poison while in police custody. This seems fabricated when they repeat the same for many cases. The question of the access of the means to suicide still remains unanswered. Further, deaths in the custody of the armed forces and the Indian Army under the control of the Central government are not reported to the NHRC as it does not have jurisdiction to investigate violations committed by the armed forces. ACHR itself has filed 50 complaints of extrajudicial killings from 2003 to 2009 from Manipur alone. Many of these alleged extrajudicial killings were indeed deaths in the custody of the Manipur Police Commandos but since the Manipur Police Commandos claim to be conducting operations jointly with the central armed forces, the deaths in the custody of the Manipur Police Commandos are not reported to the NHRC. The disturbing finding of the report points the finger at the Government as India has not ratified the Unite Nations Convention Against Torture, although it has been a signatory since October 1997. Ratification is necessary for appropriate changes to be made in the prevailing laws, and to enable institutions and executing authorities in India to be committed and accountable to address the practice of torture. Fighting torture has been a long standing campaign of many human rights organizations in India, – be it in the case of Jammu and Kashmir, the North East, Gujarat or as recently in the case from Nandigram and Singur. But the thousands of such victims who were forcefully removed from their villages and pulled to camps still suffer for no cause. In fact these blameworthy and reproachful facts marked a blot on the world's largest democracy. NM Salih is a Delhi based journalist working with The Milli Gazette, a fortnightly english newspaper. Can be contacted at nmsalih@gmail.com
|
|
During the last Hasina period, she procured 8 Mig 29s for Bangladesh Airforce. During the BNP time India stopped all the shipment of the spare parts from Russia. As a result in last five years, half of the fleet was in the shop for the lack of spare parts. Does anyone know the status of those big ticketed items of our Air Force now. Has India changed its policy at all? |
The grim picture of the law and order situation in
The situation has reached such a stage that God and good both are crying foul. The Prime Minister being an experienced politician can't enjoy her thumping majority in the parliament without showing her prowess to reign on her naughty politicians. The criminals are not stronger than the arms of law. The need is to apply law in its fullest extent to defeat them. She must show her sincerity that she cares for her people who have given her the mandate to rule.
She must act now not later.
Akbar Hussain
The grim picture of the law and order situation in
The situation has reached such a stage that God and good both are crying foul. The Prime Minister being an experienced politician can't enjoy her thumping majority in the parliament without showing her prowess to reign on her naughty politicians. The criminals are not stronger than the arms of law. The need is to apply law in its fullest extent to defeat them. She must show her sincerity that she cares for her people who have given her the mandate to rule.
She must act now not later.
Akbar Hussain
Dear Raihan
Neither the egg nor the hen was created at the begining. As I understood from the Quran and from Darwin's book on the origin of species: soil, water and lightening(electricity) had created a cell from which everything had evolved like pottery. And pottery was used by Prophet Mohammad(pbuh) to describe how the species were created.
However, I don't know if anyone ever would be able to reproduce to test this quranic revelaton or Darwin's hypothesis but that's the best accepted knowledge avaible to us.
By denying these facts, you are not only going against the Quranic revelation but also against the scientific communities accepted beliefs about evolution.
Please find below those quranic verses that meticulously and precisely the Quran describes the theory of evolution: the
origin of species.
21:30 that every living thing were made from water.
24:45 Allah has created every animal from water. Of them are some that creep on their bellies, some that walk on two legs and some that walk on four.
15:26 that we created man from sounding clay, from mud molded into shape as the one used in making pottery.
71:14 and Allah has created you in stages
71:17 And Allah has caused you to grow as a growth from the earth(gradually).
27:64 Is not He (Allah) who originates creation, and repeats it, and Who provides for you from the Skies and the earth? is there any ilah(god) with Allah? say, "bring forth your proofs, if you are truthful.
Based on those above verses, I respectfully request Mr. Raihan to reconsider his position and come to his own senses and let his mind to accept before he denies it.
And if he thinks that the soil, water, and ligthening was not the part by which a cell was created in order to species to evolve, please bring forth your proofs, if you are truthfull?
In Darwin theory of evolution, nowhere he didn't mention, we human evolved from an Ape but we human do share with the animal's genetical level or atomic or molecular level but each species has its own identical genetical code which suggests each of us were originated separately.
I think, Schrodinger's Cat and post-Darwinists' Ape analogies were introduced to generate curiosity among students for them to have tension-wisdom within themselves, so that students become aware of it and reflect on it to become better human and understand Allah's [Almighty's] creation as suggested various parts in Quran.
Only criticims should be offered and be accepted if there are any alternative views which lead us to acquire new knowledge. Please avoid psychological meanigs or stereotypes and polemic writers should refrain from commenting on this topic.
------------------------------------
****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration:
Call For Articles:
http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68
http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585
****************************************************
VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/
****************************************************
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
-Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:mukto-mona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:mukto-mona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mukto-mona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Unable to view, please visit http://quandaryreflection.blogspot.com/ Friday, July 17, 2009A report on successful seminar on "Vested Property and Endowed (Debuttor) Property: Constitutional and Human Rights of Minorities"Picture (Courtesy HRCBM-Bangladesh): A collection of news clippings from various national dailies covering HRCBM's seminar on vested property act. The seminar was jointly organized by Samprity Mancha and Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities (HRCBM) titled 'Vested property and Endowed (Debuttor) property: Constitutional and human rights of the minority people' at the Dhaka National Press Club on 16 July, 2009. Professor Ajoy Roy President of HRCBM chaired the seminar. Two-keynote papers were comprehended / presented in this seminar. One was by the Secretary General of the Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities (HRCBM) and ex-additional secretary Rabindranath Trivedi and the other was by Dr. Denish Dilip Dutta. Secretary General of the Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities (HRCBM) and ex-additional secretary Rabindranath Trivedi suggested the government for constituting a minority commission like 'Justice Rajendra Sachar Commission' in India for analyzing the socio-economic status of the Hindus in Bangladesh by his keynote. Dr. Denish Dilip Dutta added some other points relating to survey policy of Vested Property after independence of Bangladesh, as Holly Sea before the liberation war, in his notepaper. He also pushed for harassment of Christian community and other minority community members by the Local Surveyors and Attestation Officers, writing in pencil the letters 'V,P" on the porchas or related papers, and then ask some speed money to correct (erase) the same correction of math porchas for correction of a mistake that they had intentionally written in the paper. Eminent economist Prof Abul Barakat expressed that the vested property act as an 'uncivilized law'. This law must be repealed/abolished to establish a secular, progressive, liberal democratic and welfare state as stipulated in the Vision 2021 of the present government. He said around 3.5 lakh bighas of land of minorities were grabbed by the landlord as the vested property even after enactment of the "Vested Property Return Act 2001 and 50 lakh minority people of Bangladesh have felt as victim to property grabbers. He suggested the government to amend the 'Vested Property (Restoration) Act' after consulting with the victims, researchers, economists, and law specialists and human rights organizations. As the chief guest of this seminar Barrister Shafique Ahmed, minister of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs told that civilians started violating the constitution first introduced the martial law in the country after brutal killing of Father of the Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Later, Ziaur Rahman in connivance with the then Chief Justice A S M Sayem destroyed the spirit of the secular constitution established through immense sacrifices of the people of the country. He said that there are four pillars of constitution, secularism is one of them, and Islam itself is a secular religion as it acknowledges rights of every citizen irrespective of their religious faith, culture, creed, and caste. He ruled out the statement of a section of politicians that the 1972 constitution is against Islam as one of the four pillars of the constitution. He said that restoration of the constitution of 1972 only depends on the decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, which is on an appeal filed by the BNP secretary general against the High Court order in 2005. The High Court in an order in 2005 nullified fifth amendments of the constitution, which ratified the proclamation of the martial law as well as all acts of the non-elected governments after 1975. He ensured that the government has sincere efforts for restoration of the 1972 constitution to consolidate the democracy to establish equal rights of every citizen. He also said about the negative attitude of the government lawyers for helping the victims appropriately and for that reason, the grabbers get court's verdict in favor of them. He invited common recommendations from the members of the Hindu community to enact personal inheritance and marriage registration laws to establish of Hindu women rights. He also requested to the organizers to arrange another seminar without delay on this crucial issues involving with the three or four ministers of Land, Religion, law and Home ministry. Advocate Masuda Rehana Rozi, Asstt. General Secretary of Bangladesh Mahila Parishad urged to the law minister to execute Hindu Marriage Registration Programme immediately and to ensure equal inherence rights of the Hindu Women to mitigate the untold miseries and sufferings of Hindu Women. Ayesha Khanam, President of Bangladesh Mohila Parishad, Aroma Dutta, and Executive Director, PRIP Trust, Columnist Syed Abul Maksud, Mr. Hasanul Haq Inu, MP, were present in this seminar and all the said eminent persons requested to Law Minister to constitute a minority commission immediately. Mr. Kumar Birendra Nath Roy Chowdhury from Naogaon District, Mr. Nripendra Nath Das from Bagura District, Mr. Dilip Vadra, from Chittagong Jewelry Committee, Prof. Nilkanta Bepari, from Barisal, Mr. Debendra Nath Saha, from Sirajgong, Mr. Bivasendu Sarkar, from Sirajgong, Mr. Arun Chandra Das from Dinajpur, discussed about the present sufferings of the said district to the law minister and handed memorandums from district committee of HRCBM. Adv. J.K. Paul, Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Mr. Shuvash Baral, on behalf of Sree Sree Ramna Kali Mondir, Brahmacharia on behalf of World Hindu Federation delivered their grief and urged to the law minister to mitigate the sufferings of the minorities soon. Dr. Sourav Shikder and Mr. Rubyet Ferdous facilitated the seminar. About 100 people were gathered to make this seminar successful. It is worth mentioning, the news of the seminar was vividly exposed in print and electronic media. HRCBM's Seminar on Vested Property Act: Efforts on to restore 1972 constitutionPicture (courtesy HRCBM-Bangladesh): HRCBM's seminar on Vested Property Act. From top left: Bangladesh Law Minister Barrister Shafiq Ahmed and HRCBM-Bangladesh's leaders Prof. Ajoy Roy, President and R.N. Trivedi, Secretary General. Top Right: Mr. R.N. Trivdei working through papers while Barrister Shafiq Ahmed is giving speech. Bottom: Panel of speakers including Barrister Shafiq Ahmed. Report from The Daily star News Efforts on to restore 1972 constitution http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=97312 Says law minister Staff Correspondent The government is trying wholeheartedly to restore the constitution of 1972, and for that it is waiting for a positive verdict of the appellate division of the Supreme Court (SC) on the High Court's (HC) verdict on the fifth amendment to the constitution, said Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Barrister Shafique Ahmed at a seminar yesterday. "The HC verdict declaring the fifth amendment illegal is now pending in the appellate division as BNP Secretary General Khandaker Delware Hossain appealed against the verdict. If the SC verdict goes in our favour then the constitution of 1972 would be restored automatically," he added. The seminar titled 'Vested property and endowed property: Constitutional and human rights of the minority people' was organised by Samprity Mancha and Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities at the National Press Club in the city. Speaking as chief guest Shafique said, "There might be some difficulties to restore the constitution of 1972 through parliament and as such we are looking for the SC verdict." He said the government is firmly committed to try the war criminals in a way which would be accepted internationally. The minister said the minority people would not have been deprived of their land if the main principles of the liberation war like secularism were not removed from the constitution.He alleged that the government lawyers do not help the victims properly and for that the grabbers get court's verdict in favour of them. Rabindranath Tribedi, secretary general of the Congress, presented a keynote paper at the seminar. He suggested the government to form a commission to recover the vested and endowed property. Eminent economist Prof Abul Barakat said around 50 lakh minority people fell victim to property grabbers in the name of vested or enemy property. He suggested the government to amend the 'Vested Property (Restoration) Act' after consulting with the victims, researchers, law specialists and human rights organisations. Hasanul Haque Inu MP, Columnist Syed Abul Maksud and Bangladesh Mahila Parishad President Ayesha Khanam also spoke at the seminar. Thursday, July 16, 2009HRCBM's Seminar: Restoration of '72 constitution depends on Appellate Division verdict: Barrister Shafiq HRCBM's seminar: Vested Property Act & Debottor Property: The Constitutional Rights of Bangladesh Minorities Picture (courtesy: HRCBM-Bangladesh): Above pictures show sections of HRCBM's seminar that was held at National Press Club, dhaka on July 16th, 2009. BSS report on HRCBM's Seminar: Restoration of '72 constitution depends on Appellate Division verdict: Barrister Shafiq DHAKA, Bangladesh, July 16 (BSS) - Restoration of the constitution of 1972 depends on the verdict of the Appellate Division of theSupreme Court on an appeal filed by the BNP secretary general against the High Court order in 2005.Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Minister BarristerShafiq Ahmed today said this while addressing a seminar in thecity. The High Court in an order in 2005 nullified fifth amendmentsof the constitution, which ratified the proclamation of themartial law as well as all acts of the non-elected governmentsafter 1975.The law minister said the government is making its sincereefforts for restoration of the 1972 constitution to consolidatethe democracy and establish equal rights of every citizen. "We don't want to use our brute majority to amend theconstitution, rather we are waiting for the verdict of theAppellate Division," he said adding, "we hope that the AppellateDivision will give us a decision which will help restore the 1972constitution". Sampriti Mancha and Human Rights Congress for BangladeshMinorities (HRCBM) arranged the seminar on "Vested Property Actand Debottar Property: Constitutional and Human Rights of Minorities at Jatiya Press Club.Barrister Shafiq said a civilian violating the constitutionfirst introduced the martial law in the country after brutal killing of Father of the Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh MujiburRahman.Later, Ziaur Rahman in connivance with the then Chief JusticeASM Sayem entirely destroyed the spirit of the secularconstitution established through immense sacrifices of the peopleof the country, he added. The law minister ruled out the statement of a section ofpoliticians that the 1972 constitution is against Islam as one ofthe four pillars of the constitution is 'secularism'. "Islam itself is a secular religion as it acknowledges rights of every citizen irrespective of their religious faith, culture, creed and caste," the minister said. The law minister said the return of the vested property became a difficult issue as many property went in disposition forvarious reasons including negligence of the government pleadersover the years. He invited a common recommendation from the members of the Hindu community to enact personal inheritance and marriageregistration laws to establish rights of daughters on paternalproperty as well as rights of Hindu women as wives.Noted economist Professor Abul Barakat, president of Bangladesh Mohila Parishad Ayesha Khanam, journalist Syed Abul Maqsud and chief executive of PRIP Trust Aroma Dutta took part inthe discussion while Professor Ajoy Roy was in the chair. Secretary General of the HRCBM and ex-additional secretaryRabindranath Tribedi in his keynote paper urged the governmentfor constituting a minority commission like 'Justice RajendraSachar Commission' in India for analysing the socio-economicstatus of the Hindus in Bangladesh. He also called for taking immediate steps for returning theall vested property to the legal owners or their inheritors asper the court order and constituting a fact finding committeecomprising the members of the Hindu religious organizations toreview the records of the Debattar property. Prof Abul Barakat termed the vested property act as an'uncivilized law' saying the law must be repealed to establish asecular, progressive, liberal democratic and welfare state asstipulated in the Vision 2021 of the present government. Around 3.5 lakh bighas of land were shown as the vestedproperty even after enactment of the "Vested Property Return Act2001, he said adding that 'we now need immediate decision todispose of the matter. He urged the government not to depend on only bureaucracy, rather including sufferers, human rights activities, notedlawyers and citizens in the process settle the matter. |
Top terror Bikash released from jail: official Dhaka, July 16 (bdnews24.com)—Top terror Bikash Kumar Biswas, facing a raft of murder, abduction and extortion charges, was released on bail Thursday, after serving 12 years in a Kashimpur jail, a jail official said. Kashimpur Jail-2 official Forman Ali told bdnews24.com, "Bikash was released in the evening as he secured bail in cases against him." Bikash and his brother Prokash Kumar Biswas were two of the four most wanted criminals on a list of Dhaka Metropolitan Police during the last term of the Awami League government. The two brothers led a notorious criminal network known as the 'Prokash-Bikash gang'. Bikash was arrested by DMP's Detective Branch in 1997, accused in the murder of a Chhatra League leader and a double murder in Agargaon, as well as extortion and abduction cases. Many have alleged thatBikash continued his activities, and continued to lead his crime gangbased in Dhaka's Mirpur area, even while he was in jail. bdnews24.com/lh/gma/pks/rah/2259h |
Jihad and Imperialism By Maulvi Yahya Nomani (Translated from Urdu by Yoginder Sikand) Some critics of Islam claim that the Islamic doctrine of jihad is but a license for imperialist conquest. There is, of course, no truth in this argument. When discussing this issue, we need to focus on what Islamic teachings about the subject are, instead of judging Islam by the actions of some self-styled Muslim rulers, who may have wrongly sought to legitimize their wars of conquests in the name of jihad. The jihad that Islam sanctions is only for certain specified purposes, and to be undertaken only under extreme circumstances. It must abide by certain rules and conditions. It must be inspired solely by the desire for closeness to God and by indifference to worldly pleasures and luxuries. Such a jihad is a need and blessing for humankind to end the darkness of oppression and lead humanity to the pinnacle of blessings. At the same time, we must recognize that it is possible that some Muslim groups who claim to be engaged in jihad are bereft of the character required for those undertake jihad. Yet, this does not mean that the Islamic principle or doctrine of jihad is itself faulty. Every thinking person will agree with this assertion of the Quran that if the spirit of jihad and people inspired by it were emptied from the world it would mean the victory of evil. The Quran says that in the absence of these there would be nothing to stop strife in the world. In other words, it is a major blessing from God that, through his prophets, He has ordered His chosen slaves to adopt piety and extirpate strife and oppression from the world and guide humankind and work for its welfare, using, if need be, physical violence for this purpose in the form of jihad. Islam is a religious and spiritual message and invitation. Its real aim is not to capture power for a particular community or to ensure that a particular community should rule. Rather, its aim is to promote the moral values and spiritual truths that form the basis of its message. If Muslim political power helps to promote this aim it is desirable. However, if it proves to be a hurdle in this path it is hateful, and the Quran indicates that God will certainly destroy such power of the Muslims and make them face utter humiliation. Islam has blessed jihad as a struggle in God's path. Those who are truly engaged in jihad are forever mindful of the Day of Judgment, when each soul will have to stand before God and account for his or her deeds, for as the Quran says: That House of the Hereafter We shall give to those who intend not high-handedness or mischief on earth: and the End is (best) for the righteous (Quran 28:83). If, as a result of jihad, God grants His slaves an opportunity to govern, they must realize that this is a custody (amanat), for which they will be accountable to God. If someone misuses this opportunity and, instead of regarding it as a custody from God, uses it to acquire worldly honour, power and luxuries, he will be severely punished on the Day of Judgment. When God appointed Hazrat Daud (David) as a ruler, He instructed him thus: O David! We did indeed make thee a vicegerent on earth: so judge thou between men in truth (and justice): nor follow thou the lusts, (of thy heart), for they will mislead thee from the Path of Allah: for those who wander astray from the Path of Allah, is a Penalty Grievous, for that they forget the Day of Account. (Quran 38:26) Being constantly mindful of the Day of Judgment alone can safeguard this custody given to rulers so that, despite having vast powers, they do not transgress the limits set by God. The path exemplified by the Quran and the Prophet's practice can undoubtedly ensure proper protection of the soul. In a hadith report recorded in the Sahih of Muslim, the Prophet once instructed his companion Abuzar regarding the great responsibilities concerning the custody that governance is, adding that on the Day of Judgment it would cause rulers to suffer, save for those who ruled according to the truth and abided by their responsibilities. Orientalist scholars have sought to related the jihads of the Prophet in terms of the economic marginalization of the Arabs of that time, especially the Bedouins. Hence, they claim that the real intention of jihad was to acquire wealth. This is not true. If this were really the case, why would the leader of these jihads, the Noble Prophet, have remained poor till he departed from this world? By the time of the Prophet's demise, the whole of In the Prophet's time, the largest war booty was secured in the aftermath of the war of Hawazan. The people of Hawazan had brought along all their wealth with them to the battlefield. When they were defeated, their wealth fell into the hands of the Muslims. If the aim of this or the other jihads of the Prophet's time was lust for wealth, the booty gained from the Battle of Hawazan would surely have been sent to the homes of Muslims in Maulvi Yahya Nomani can be contacted on yahyanomani@yahoo.com
Yoginder Sikand works with the Centre for the Study of Social Exclusion and Inclusive Social Policy at the National Law School, Bangalore . |