Banner Advertiser

Monday, April 11, 2016

Re: [mukto-mona] বাংলাদেশের পাঠ্যপুস্তকে স্বাধীনতা চেতনার মূল ভিত্তিকে গুড়ো গুড়ো করে দেওয়া হচ্ছে



In that theme, the descendants of Abbas Uddin Ahmed were against the liberation of Bangladesh.  Isn't that true?

2016-04-10 4:59 GMT+06:00 মুস্তাফা জামান mabbasi.dhaka.net@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>:
 

বাংলাদেশের পাঠ্যপুস্তকে স্বাধীনতা চেতনার মূল ভিত্তিকে গুড়ো গুড়ো করে দেওয়া হচ্ছে

বাংলাদেশের পাঠ্যপুস্তকের ক্লাস ৯-১০ এর বাংলা বইয়ে একটি কবিতা সংযুক্ত করা হয়েছে, কবিতার নাম: 'সাঁকোটা দুলছে', লেখক- সুনীল গঙ্গোপাধ্যায়। কবিতা মূল থিম ১৯৪৭ এ দেশভাগের সময় দুটো কিশোরের বন্ধুত্ব নষ্ট হওয়ার কষ্ট। কবিতার শেষে বইয়ের ২৩৬ পৃষ্ঠায় দুটি উদ্দীপক আছে। আসুন, উদ্দীপক দুটো পড়ি-
প্রথম উদ্দীপক:
শিহাব সেনগ্রাম মিডল স্কুলে পড়তো। বহাদুরপুর, মেঘনা, বাগমারা, সেনগ্রাম পাশাপাশি গ্রাম ছিলো । গ্রামের হিন্দু-মুসলমান শিক্ষার্থীরা হাসি-আনন্দে স্কুলে যেতো। ১৯৪৬ সালে দেশভাগ হলে শিহাব দেখতে পেলো তার হিন্দু সহপাঠীরা ভারত চলে যাচ্ছে। দেবব্রতের সঙ্গে বন্ধুত্বের স্মৃতি শিহাব ভুলতে পারে না। স্কুলের সামনের বরই গাছ থেকে বরই পাড়ার স্মৃতি ৭০ বছর বয়সেও শিহাব বিস্মৃতি হয়নি।
দ্বিতীয় উদ্দীপক:
ঋত্বিক কুমার ঘটক বিখ্যাত চলচ্চিত্রকার। তার অধিকাংশ চলচিত্রে দেশভাগের যন্ত্রণা প্রকাশ পেয়েছে। নিজের জন্মস্থানে যেতে হলে পাসপোর্ট ও ভিসা লাগবে এই বেদনা তার মতো অনেকেই মেনে নিতে পারেন না। এ কারণেই তিনি বলতেন, 'বাংলার ভাগ করিবার পারিছ, কিন্তু দিলটারে ভাগ করবার পারো নাই"
পাঠক এ কবিতার মূল উদ্দেশ্য বাংলাদেশের কোমলমতি ছাত্র-ছাত্রীদের শিক্ষা দেওয়া ১৯৪৭ সালের দেশভাগ মোটেও উচিত হয়নি, রাজনৈতিক কারণে কষ্ঠের ভাগিদার হতে হয়েছে হিন্দু-মুসলমানদের। উল্লেখ্য কিছুদিন আগে পশ্চিমবঙ্গে রিলিজ পাওয়া সিনেমা 'রাজকাহিনী'ও একই শিক্ষা দিয়েছিলো। আর সেই রাজকাহিনীর শিক্ষা এখন চলছে বাংলাদেশর পাঠ্যপুস্তকে।
আসলে এ কবিতাটি ছাত্র-ছাত্রীদের জন্য যে কতটা ক্ষতিকর তা বোধকরি এখনও কেউ অনুধাবন করে নাই। এই কবিতাটি হচ্ছে এক প্রকার ইমোশনালি ব্ল্যাকমেইল, যার মাধ্যমে বাংলাদেশী ছাত্র-ছাত্রীদের স্বাধীনতা চেতনার মূল ভিত্তিকে গুড়ো গুড়ো করে দেওয়া হচ্ছে। কারণ-
পূর্ব বঙ্গ বা পূর্ব পাকিস্তান নামে যদি কোন দেশ না সৃষ্টি হতো, তবে বাংলাদেশ নামক দেশও সৃষ্টি হতো না। বাংলাদেশ তখন হতো ভারতের একটি অঙ্গরাজ্যের নাম। তাই ১৯৭১ বাংলাদেশ স্বাধীনতা সংগ্রাম যতটুকু গুরুত্বপূর্ণ, ঠিক সমপরিমাণ গুরুত্বপূর্ণ হচ্ছে ১৯৪৭ এ পূর্ব বাংলা বা পূর্ব পাকিস্তানের সৃষ্টি। এ কারণে ১৯৭১ সালে যারা বাংলাদেশে সৃষ্টিতে মূখ্য ভূমিকা রেখেছিলেন, তারাই কিন্তু ১৯৪৭ এর দেশ ভাগের পক্ষে ছিলেন। যেমন বঙ্গবন্ধু, সোহরাওয়ার্দী, ভাস্নাী সবাই ছিলেন দেশভাগের অন্যতম নেতা। বঙ্গবন্ধু তার অসমাপ্ত আত্মজীবনীতে বলেছিলেন- "পাকিস্তান না হলে দশ কোটি মুসলমানের কি হবে? ...অখণ্ড ভারতে যে মুসলমানদের অস্তিত্ব থাকবে না এটা আমি মন প্রাণ দিয়ে বিশ্বাস করতাম" । (সূত্র: বঙ্গবন্ধু লিখিত "অসমাপ্ত আত্মজীবনী") অর্থাৎ ১৯৪৭ এ দেশভাগ হেয় করে কবিতা রচনার অর্থ হচ্ছে, বাংলাদেশের স্বাধীনতার প্রাণপুরুষদের দীর্ঘ সংগ্রামকে অস্বীকার করা। তাই যদি ১৯৪৭ এ ভারত-পাকিস্তান ভাগ হওয়ার সুখ-দুঃখ নিয়ে কবিতা লিখতেই হয়, তবে ১৯৭১ কে নিয়েও একই ধরনের কবিতা লিখতে হবে। কারণ ঐ সময় অনেক বাংলাদেশী-বিহারীর মধ্যে অন্তরঙ্গ বন্ধুত্ব ছিলো।
মূলত: ভারতীয় গোয়েন্দা সংস্থা র' অনেক দিন ধরেই বাংলাদেশেীদের মধ্যে প্রচার করে যাচ্ছে- ১৯৪৭ এ হিন্দু-মুসলিম ভাগ হওয়া ঠিক হয়নি। উদ্দেশ্য বাংলাদেশকে ভারতের অঙ্গরাজ্য বানানো। এ কারণে কিছুদিন আগে ভারতের দেব নামক এক অভিনেতা এসে বলেছিলো - "দাও দুই বাংলা এক করে দাও"। এখন ঐ তত্ত্ব পাঠ্যপুস্তকের মাধ্যমে শেখানো হচ্ছে কোমলমতি শিশুদের। অথচ '৪৭ এর দেশভাগকে অস্বীকার করা মানে হচ্ছে বাংলাদেশের স্বাধীনতাকে অস্বীকার করা এবং এক কথায় বাংলাদেশকে ভারতের অঙ্গরাজ্য হিসেবে মেনে নেওয়া। দেখা যাবে, এই কবিতার পড়ার কারণে বাংলাদেশের ভবিষ্যত প্রজন্ম নিজেরাই বলবে- "৪৭ এর দেশভাগ ভুল ছিলো, দাও দুই বাংলা এক করে দাও।"




__._,_.___

Posted by: Kamal Das <kamalctgu@gmail.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force




You are much more worried about the intra-religious caste-system that is dying than the inter-religious communality that is on the rise.


From: "Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
I differ from you on several points here, Dr. Roy.

1) Caste system never had what you called 'glory'. It was wrong even under the best of interpretations. If people were to be divided based upon profession, there had to be accredited institutions that would certify each person's profession; and when profession changed, the previous certificate had to be replaced with a new one.

Now, don't tell me that all kinds of people all over the world would continue to identify themselves in terms of their professions, caste system or not. There is nothing wrong in it, except when it is tied to the stupidity of religions, except when people are not given the opportunity to choose their profession, except when a basic level of respect for humanity is not accorded to all honest and needed profession.

2) Intra-commune division is not communality (sectarian division/hatred)!! What an absurd argument! When you have four castes, you do not have one community, Dr. Roy; you have four.

3) You are missing a critical aspect of what you called 'intra-commune' divisions. When a so-called untouchable Hindu became a Muslim, he got promoted to a human from dirt; don't you agree? After that, do you really think that that Muslim human would be likely to love the Hindu humans? I would say, he would be likely to hate Hindus, unless if he were an exceptionally tolerant/wise person. Now, there don't you have the caste system to a great extent responsible for the Hindu-Muslim hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

================================

On Sunday, April 10, 2016 10:17 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Yes, I meant to say that - caste-system is almost non-existent. Thank you.
I am sure caste-system still exists in peoples' mind, but it has lost its past glory. I would not call caste-system as communality, because caste-system is an intra-commune system. Also, hatred within the caste system flows in all directions; even Shudras hate non-Shudras as well.
I know a case, where a Brahmin girl, from a very prominent progressive family, fell in love with a highly educated Shudra boy. When girl's family agreed to their marriage, boy's family and his society was against it. Even people demonstrated in front of boy's home. Fortunately, those two families finally agreed, and the marriage ceremony went through. So, the caste hatred is a complicated issue.
Here, I am talking about the communality that is causing religious persecution and murder.
Jiten Roy





From: "Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Yes, Dr. Roy, I was not talking about the state of the caste system now. I was talking about the past where the caste system was certainly a big factor in the birth and continuation of sectarian hatred (aka: communalism) in the subcontinent. By the way, the caste system is hardly almost non-existent now. (I suppose you meant "almost non-existent now", but actually wrote "almost existent now".) Even among the urban elite, including some PhD degree holders that hold good positions in the USA, it still exists. It certainly very much exists in a lot of places in India.

Religion peddlers are not the only species to blame here. Without serious beliefs in the religious nonsense among the population at large, the peddlers could not be very successful, could they? If there were no fools, who could the crooks fool?
SuBain

=============================

On Sunday, April 10, 2016 1:03 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Caste system is a dying concept now. As, the so called, backward class gets education and other opportunities, which they will, the natural force will take care of the class system.  
Dr. Bain is talking about half a century old perception that is almost existent now. The concept of religious identity is the source of communality; attention needs to be focused on that front.
As I see – religion and religious identity are two separate entities. Religion is a belief system, which has nothing to do with changing one's identity, as it does now. We should have only one identity, and that is – we are human, and human may have many beliefs; religion or lack thereof is one such belief. That's all.
Unfortunately, religion-peddlers needed to introduce religious identity with each religion to serve their interests. That process has divided human race into various communes, and introduced communality.
I understand, the natural tendency of all species is to form commune, but, human beings may have taken this tendency into extreme - by dividing the race into millions of communes and sub-communes; human race has lost equilibrium now.
When equilibrium is broken, nature will take its turn to attain equilibrium. That process has started; it will go on until we all become human again. 
Jiten Roy  
 



Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...










From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app






Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Yes, Dr. Roy, I was not talking about the state of the caste system now. I was talking about the past where the caste system was certainly a big factor in the birth and continuation of sectarian hatred (aka: communalism) in the subcontinent. By the way, the caste system is hardly almost non-existent now. (I suppose you meant "almost non-existent now", but actually wrote "almost existent now".) Even among the urban elite, including some PhD degree holders that hold good positions in the USA, it still exists. It certainly very much exists in a lot of places in India.

Religion peddlers are not the only species to blame here. Without serious beliefs in the religious nonsense among the population at large, the peddlers could not be very successful, could they? If there were no fools, who could the crooks fool?
SuBain

=============================

On Sunday, April 10, 2016 1:03 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Caste system is a dying concept now. As, the so called, backward class gets education and other opportunities, which they will, the natural force will take care of the class system.  
Dr. Bain is talking about half a century old perception that is almost existent now. The concept of religious identity is the source of communality; attention needs to be focused on that front.
As I see – religion and religious identity are two separate entities. Religion is a belief system, which has nothing to do with changing one's identity, as it does now. We should have only one identity, and that is – we are human, and human may have many beliefs; religion or lack thereof is one such belief. That's all.
Unfortunately, religion-peddlers needed to introduce religious identity with each religion to serve their interests. That process has divided human race into various communes, and introduced communality.
I understand, the natural tendency of all species is to form commune, but, human beings may have taken this tendency into extreme - by dividing the race into millions of communes and sub-communes; human race has lost equilibrium now.
When equilibrium is broken, nature will take its turn to attain equilibrium. That process has started; it will go on until we all become human again. 
Jiten Roy  
 



Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...










From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app










Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
I differ from you on several points here, Dr. Roy.

1) Caste system never had what you called 'glory'. It was wrong even under the best of interpretations. If people were to be divided based upon profession, there had to be accredited institutions that would certify each person's profession; and when profession changed, the previous certificate had to be replaced with a new one.

Now, don't tell me that all kinds of people all over the world would continue to identify themselves in terms of their professions, caste system or not. There is nothing wrong in it, except when it is tied to the stupidity of religions, except when people are not given the opportunity to choose their profession, except when a basic level of respect for humanity is not accorded to all honest and needed profession.

2) Intra-commune division is not communality (sectarian division/hatred)!! What an absurd argument! When you have four castes, you do not have one community, Dr. Roy; you have four.

3) You are missing a critical aspect of what you called 'intra-commune' divisions. When a so-called untouchable Hindu became a Muslim, he got promoted to a human from dirt; don't you agree? After that, do you really think that that Muslim human would be likely to love the Hindu humans? I would say, he would be likely to hate Hindus, unless if he were an exceptionally tolerant/wise person. Now, there don't you have the caste system to a great extent responsible for the Hindu-Muslim hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

================================

On Sunday, April 10, 2016 10:17 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Yes, I meant to say that - caste-system is almost non-existent. Thank you.
I am sure caste-system still exists in peoples' mind, but it has lost its past glory. I would not call caste-system as communality, because caste-system is an intra-commune system. Also, hatred within the caste system flows in all directions; even Shudras hate non-Shudras as well.
I know a case, where a Brahmin girl, from a very prominent progressive family, fell in love with a highly educated Shudra boy. When girl's family agreed to their marriage, boy's family and his society was against it. Even people demonstrated in front of boy's home. Fortunately, those two families finally agreed, and the marriage ceremony went through. So, the caste hatred is a complicated issue.
Here, I am talking about the communality that is causing religious persecution and murder.
Jiten Roy





From: "Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Yes, Dr. Roy, I was not talking about the state of the caste system now. I was talking about the past where the caste system was certainly a big factor in the birth and continuation of sectarian hatred (aka: communalism) in the subcontinent. By the way, the caste system is hardly almost non-existent now. (I suppose you meant "almost non-existent now", but actually wrote "almost existent now".) Even among the urban elite, including some PhD degree holders that hold good positions in the USA, it still exists. It certainly very much exists in a lot of places in India.

Religion peddlers are not the only species to blame here. Without serious beliefs in the religious nonsense among the population at large, the peddlers could not be very successful, could they? If there were no fools, who could the crooks fool?
SuBain

=============================

On Sunday, April 10, 2016 1:03 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Caste system is a dying concept now. As, the so called, backward class gets education and other opportunities, which they will, the natural force will take care of the class system.  
Dr. Bain is talking about half a century old perception that is almost existent now. The concept of religious identity is the source of communality; attention needs to be focused on that front.
As I see – religion and religious identity are two separate entities. Religion is a belief system, which has nothing to do with changing one's identity, as it does now. We should have only one identity, and that is – we are human, and human may have many beliefs; religion or lack thereof is one such belief. That's all.
Unfortunately, religion-peddlers needed to introduce religious identity with each religion to serve their interests. That process has divided human race into various communes, and introduced communality.
I understand, the natural tendency of all species is to form commune, but, human beings may have taken this tendency into extreme - by dividing the race into millions of communes and sub-communes; human race has lost equilibrium now.
When equilibrium is broken, nature will take its turn to attain equilibrium. That process has started; it will go on until we all become human again. 
Jiten Roy  
 



Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...










From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app






Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Yes, Dr. Roy, I was not talking about the state of the caste system now. I was talking about the past where the caste system was certainly a big factor in the birth and continuation of sectarian hatred (aka: communalism) in the subcontinent. By the way, the caste system is hardly almost non-existent now. (I suppose you meant "almost non-existent now", but actually wrote "almost existent now".) Even among the urban elite, including some PhD degree holders that hold good positions in the USA, it still exists. It certainly very much exists in a lot of places in India.

Religion peddlers are not the only species to blame here. Without serious beliefs in the religious nonsense among the population at large, the peddlers could not be very successful, could they? If there were no fools, who could the crooks fool?
SuBain

=============================

On Sunday, April 10, 2016 1:03 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Caste system is a dying concept now. As, the so called, backward class gets education and other opportunities, which they will, the natural force will take care of the class system.  
Dr. Bain is talking about half a century old perception that is almost existent now. The concept of religious identity is the source of communality; attention needs to be focused on that front.
As I see – religion and religious identity are two separate entities. Religion is a belief system, which has nothing to do with changing one's identity, as it does now. We should have only one identity, and that is – we are human, and human may have many beliefs; religion or lack thereof is one such belief. That's all.
Unfortunately, religion-peddlers needed to introduce religious identity with each religion to serve their interests. That process has divided human race into various communes, and introduced communality.
I understand, the natural tendency of all species is to form commune, but, human beings may have taken this tendency into extreme - by dividing the race into millions of communes and sub-communes; human race has lost equilibrium now.
When equilibrium is broken, nature will take its turn to attain equilibrium. That process has started; it will go on until we all become human again. 
Jiten Roy  
 



Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...










From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Ronald Inden, a Chicago based Indologist, wrote Hindu caste system was the product of Turkish rule in India. Earlier caste was based on profession, later it was inherited by birth. However, in this backward society even my students of Brahman ancestry bow down to pick dust from my toe, an act otherwise known as pranama.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
"Communalism was born out of colonial policy...." - A piece of rubbish by Romila Thapar.

"We have to recognise that we too, like every other society with a long past, have not been a society characterized by tolerance and non-violence. However much we may wish to believe that we were tolerant and non-violent, it simply isn't true." - Some sense by Romila Thapar.

Did the colonial rulers create the caste system? Did the colonial rulers write the Koran that clearly despises idolatry (Hinduism)? "We too" is a terrible understatement. "We" - our ancestors, were the core problem. The solution is nothing short of burning much of the religious rubbish that made our ancestors hateful.

Here is a nonviolent one: When a so-called high caste Hindu had to take a bath just because he touched the shadow of a Muslim or of a so-called low-caste Hindu, you think that was not hatred?

Sukhamaya Bain

=======================================


On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:36 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

Religion is the mother of communalism. However, on some special circumstances, nationalism can blanket communalism, as did during the liberation of India from British Colonialism, and also during the liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan. Unfortunately, most of the time, nationalism remains dormant, but, communalism is active 24/7. That's why - fighting communalism with nationalism, and Ms. Romila Thapar is trying to do, does not work. As you know, right after the liberation of India and Bangladesh, communalism lifted its ugly head, and remains prominent even today. Communalism will not go away as long as religion is there in the society. To fight communalism, one must fight religion. 
Jiten Roy




From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Religion-based Nationalism is back in Full Force

 
Lopsided view.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
আমি যে মহা অাপত্তি তুলি ইংরেজের তৈরী ধর্মভিত্তিক আদমশুমারির বিরূদ্ধে যার উপর নির্ভর করে আমরা "সংখ্যালঘু/সংখ্যাগুরু" হিসাব নিয়ে মাথা ফাটাই, দেশ বিভাগ করি -- কেন করি? উপমহাদেশের সর্বজনশ্রদ্ধেয় ঐতিহাসিক রোমিলা থাপার সেই কথার ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন সহজ করে - - সকলে পড়ুন, এবং সত্য তথ্যগুলো স্মরণে রাখুন - -

<< The two-nation theory fueled communalism, assisted by another colonial contribution which was the Census that led to describing Indian society as consisting of a majority community and minority communities. To this was added the colonial theory of the foundation of Indian civilisation being the Aryanism of the Vedas. This contributed to the concept of the nation as a Hindu Rashtra and the Hindu therefore being the primary citizen of India. >>


alt
Image: The Hindu  
In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all-inclusive, anti-colonialism nationalism that brought us independence, would, despite Partition, be firmly established. This was in some ways such a firm belief that it was not thought necessary to specify the inclusion of secularism in the Constitution at the initial stage.  This has not happened. Religion as political mobilisation, and religion-based identity as the core of nationalism, sometimes called communalism, is back in full force.
Image: The Hindu In the 1960s we were confident that the use of religion for political mobilisation would decline because nationalism, namely, the secular, all ...











Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app










__._,_.___

Posted by: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___