Banner Advertiser

Friday, May 22, 2009

[ALOCHONA] Indian elections and the Bangladesh perspective




 
THERE is a similarity in the just announced results of the Indian elections with Bangladesh's on December 29th. The winners in both cases were expected to win but the ultimate results were beyond their most optimistic expectations. In India's case, the Congress led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) overcame the anti-incumbency bug to return to power. Manmohon Singh, already named to become Prime Minister for another term, will thus become the first PM after Jawaharlal Nehru in 1961 to return to office in successive elections. It was the Congress' best show in many decades. The party won 203 seats; a number they passed in 1984 and 1991, both held after assassinations (1984, Indira Gandhi; 1991, Rajiv Gandhi) that brought the party sympathy votes.

In the final tally, the Congress led UPA won 260 seats, just teasingly short of the magical figure of 272. Its main opponent the BJP led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) secured 158 seats. In the last elections, the Congress had won only 145 seats and was at the mercy of its alliance partners, an amalgam of left and regional parties, to govern India and carry out the economic reforms crucial to India's future. This time, the party is much better poised to stamp its authority on alliance partners and thus it will be better placed to carry its agenda of economic reform. It can get the remaining number short of 272 without any horse trading. The elections will thus bring a stable government in New Delhi.

The results have given a national party the mandate to govern the country after many decades when politics in New Delhi was subjected to the regional agenda with region based parties sharing power with a national party like the Congress or the BJP in a manner where they could dictate many of the decisions. In fact, one of the most decisive verdicts of the Indian elections has been the choice of the voters against regionalism, although before the elections regional leaders such as Mayawati, Buddhadev Bhattacharya, Narendra Modi and a few others were being touted as possible Prime Ministers. The elections have thus rejected regionalism in national politics.

Among the other clear choices that the voters have made, one is undoubtedly for a secular India. BJP leaders themselves have put blame on Varun Gandhi's anti-Muslim hate speech during the campaign and Gujarat Chief Minister Mr. Narendra Modi's name coming up as a possible Prime Minister of India as two of the main reasons for NDA's resounding defeat. Mr. Modi earned notoriety both in India and abroad for his role in instigating anti-Muslim riots in his province in 2002 for which he has been black listed for US visa by the US authorities. The Indian voters have thus cast their votes for secularism and against communalism.

The UPA, however, did not win the elections on just these negative factors. The voters have taken note of the positive changes that India has achieved in the last five years and concluded that they needed the Congress for another term with a clear mandate to transform India into one of the top economies of the world. They have also voted with the clear perception that in the turbulent times through which India is passing with the rest of the world, she needed at the centre a national party that would look to the outside world rather than get bogged down with conflicts and politics in the regions of India. The results indicate a faith in the Congress for its policies and outlook.

The routing of the left front that had been a major obstacle for the Congress-led government is another major outcome of the elections. The left led a third front and lost even in its traditional strongholds of Kerala and West Bengal. It came out of the UPA government and opposed many of the economic reforms and the civil nuclear deal with the USA. Mamata Banarjee's Trinomul bagged 19 seats and with Congress winning 25 of the 42 seats in West Bengal, leaving the left with 15, it gave rise to speculation that the left's decades-old stranglehold in WB may be fading. The voters have also unequivocally rejected the left in national politics as a third force.

The voters' choice for UPA will have a positive impact on how India builds its strategic partnership with the United States. When Manmohon Singh signed the civil nuclear deal, President Bush was in office. As Prime Minister of a stronger Indian government, Manmohon Singh can now build upon that partnership with President Obama. He will now be in a more comfortable situation dealing with President Obama on other issues extending from economic reforms to climate change. President Obama will also find himself dealing with a new and strong Indian government at a time when the US is deeply involved with security of the region, with situation in Pakistan and Afghanistan sliding and in need of a dependable regional ally. A strong government in New Delhi will also send equally strong signals abroad to dispel fears of foreign investors.

Indian voters have always been fascinated with charismatic national leaders and for good reasons. In the British days, they were fascinated with Gandhi, Patel and a host of other national leaders. In free India, they were fascinated with Nehru and then Indira Gandhi. Then as regional politics took hold in New Delhi, charismatic national leaders became history. This year's elections witnessed the re-emergence of charisma in Indian politics manifested with all the charm and aura in the person of Rahul Gandhi, whose mother Congress Chief and wife of late Rajiv Gandhi matched her son as another charismatic leader in Indian politics. The son and mother duo had a significant impact on voters in favour of the Congress led UPA. Rahul, the anti-thesis of his cousin Varun, is now seen as a Prime Minister waiting in the wings and will surely be inducted in the new government.

For Bangladesh, the results have opened opportunities on a number of fronts. It will allow our government to interact with a stable government in New Delhi led by a resurgent Congress with which the Awami League has traditional and historical affinity. As a Prime Minister Dr. Manmohon Singh is wise and positive and we can expect that in his second term he will focus more on improvement of relations with neighbours including Bangladesh. The elections will bring into Indian politics a new generation of leaders led by Rahul Gandhi who can be expected to look forward to for a better South Asia than has hitherto been the case. We were disappointed at the way relations have been handled since the AL came to office in January, particularly surprised that the Indian Foreign Minister visited Dhaka and had failed to meet the leader of the opposition while meeting the Army Chief. We hope the new government will be more sensitive towards Bangladesh.

The Indian elections have many lessons for us if we are willing to take. The grace with which LK Advani accepted defeat is a lesson that, if taken by our leading politicians, could really open a world of opportunity for us. His offer to resign to take responsibility for his front and party's defeat is a democratic tradition that we could emulate in Bangladesh. On his part, Manmohon Singh sought Advani's support and constructive criticism to run the new government, saying: "we must open a new chapter in the working relations between the government and the principal opposition." Sonia Gandhi's leadership style where she has put the nation before self is one our political leaders could follow.

The new governments in India and Bangladesh are expected to run parallel over the next five years. These are momentous times when opportunities are knocking at our doors. In Bangladesh, there has been a perceptible change in mindset for better relations with India based on mutuality. A strong government under Manmohon Singh can ensure a similar change in the Indian mindset. The two Prime Ministers must meet without losing time to cash upon the wind of change in our respective countries. They should send the message to the respective administrations that they have the political will for the change in the mindset that has kept Bangladesh-India relations from achieving their potentials.. We should also make diplomatic efforts to reach Sonia Gandhi for her support in building Bangladesh-India relations and not get bogged down at the level of the Indian External Affairs Ministry where we seem to be stuck at the moment. The new Indian Government will take office after the parliament meets on June 2nd.

The writer is a former Ambassador to Japan and Director, Centre for Foreign Affairs Studies.
  http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=89389



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Upper Riparian River-linking :Economy and environment under threat



Upper Riparian River-linking :Economy and environment under threat
 
Prof Mustafizur Rahman Tarafdar

Nearly forty years ago in the late sixtys we came across a news item that India was contemplating a river-linking project.
 
 
The Indian river-linking project, regarded as a myth so long, turned a reality when the Supreme Court of India in 2002 authorized it. There are two components of the project: One, linking fourteen Himalayan rivers in northern India and the other connecting sixteen peninsular rivers including the Ganges and the Brahmaputra. Bangladesh has reportedly expressed its grave concern on the potential impacts of the project on both economy and environment of the country. It is apparent that the bulk of the waters for the project will come from the Brahmaputra and the Ganges, particularly the Brahmaputra, dwarfing the combined flow of other peninsular rivers.

The peninsular rivers, combined, will flow deep into the south through the water-hungry dry lands and water-thirsty deserts in the north, middle and south India. The main link canal will be virtually a large river flowing through Bihar, UP, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Maharastra, Karnataka to Chennai. The project is apprehended to inflict irreversible and irrevocable damage to the economy and environment in Bangladesh.

Equitable sharing of waters
Unilateral withdrawal of Brahmaputra waters tantamounts to violation of UN Convention which regulates the flow of international transboundary rivers/drainage basins. There must be serious negotiations between India, Nepal and Bangladesh and exchange of information on survey, planning and design data of the project. Some of the fundamental principles of the international law is that the holder of a right must exercise it in a manner not injurious to others. Negotiation for a fair and equitable share of water of the Brahmaputra and other rivers must start now between India and Bangladesh, perhaps better will be trilateral negotiation involving Nepal on whose land about seven dams and reservoirs will be built for hydropower generation and augmentation of water for beneficial use in India, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Nepal will contribute its precious land territory for the dams and reservoirs, hence it is their legitimate right to access to water and power. What about Bangladesh? Our share vis-a-vis our obligation, an investment, if any, should be negotiated and settled. Negotiation about sharing of water of the Brahmaputra and that of the Nepalese rivers, should be not only on quantity of water, but also to ensure its monitoring, measurement and availability at the Ganges and Brahmaputra borders with Bangladesh. We have dire need of shared water and power from India and Nepal.

Without monitoring and measuring at the border of the Ganges and Brahmaputra with Bangladesh it is doubtful whether the agreed quantity is available there. That's why the Ganges in the lean season in Bangladesh is virtually dry or has just a trickling flow, with formation of shoals (chars).

Diversion of the Brahmaputra waters
The proposed Indian river-linking project will virtually change the course of the huge river from its age-old natural N-S direction to an uphill adverse E-W direction, which means, may be almost the entire flow of the river will be diverted. We must know the designed rate of diversion flow. Fair share of water must be negotiated and agreed upon. Now it was analyzed that the average recorded low flow discharge in the months of Dec-May (6 months) is of the order of 6,000 cubic meter per second. It is presumed that an appreciable portion for the whole flow during the lean season will be diverted.

This flow will total to 200 billion cubic meter of water for the six dry months. The Brahmaputra basin downstream will turn dry with direct and peripheral adverse effects in the entire Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna basin (GBM). The result will be catastrophic and devastating both upon our economy and environment. Obviously, there will be serious adverse impacts on agriculture, water supply, irrigation, fishery, forestry, groundwater and environment. There will be serious saline water intrusion.

The Padma-Meghna basin will also suffer from low flow with serious consequence of siltation and deposition of sediments which will affect navigation and increase severity of flooding. The Padma-Meghna basin will be affected by saline water intrusion polluting the surface and groundwater. At present for the huge upland flow, salinity is pushed by the coast in the lower Meghna basin.

Chinese plan for diversion of the Brahmaputra
China plans to construct a dam at Yarlung Tsangpo point on the Brahmaputra river in Tibet to divert 200 billion cubic meter of water annually to the Yellow River. As mentioned earlier this will amount to a flow rate of 6,000 cubic meter of water per second which is equal to the entire dry reason (Dec-May) flow of the Brahmaputra. If China diverts such a huge quantity of water, what then will remain for India to withdraw? It is an ironic paradox. However, it is a serious matter of utmost importance for Bangladesh. Both India and Bangladesh are curious and serious to see how the Chinese plan moves. So, for any action on diversion of water from the Brahmaputra, China must be involved in negotiation on fair and equitable sharing of water for mutual benefits among India, China and Bangladesh. China's diversion will put further pressure on Bangladesh's share.

Adverse impacts
Just imagine suddenly a live vibrant flowing massive river turning dry and decadent! Low flow will cause sedimentation, raise river beds creating obstruction to navigation. High bed level will also cause flooding, huge flood flows will be released from India as well as China during the monsoons.

Adverse effects will be all pervasive in all the economic activities like agriculture, drinking water supply, industries, navigation, fisheries, forestry and what not.

Groundwater level will also deplete consequentially making the common dugwells and shallow tubewells dry, affecting rural as well as urban water supply. Numberous distributaries and side channels will turn dry affecting water supply in rural areas, causing health hazards and putting the very living of the people at stake.

Fishery will be severely affected, transforming millions of fishermen jobless, thus hitting a vital part of economy of the country.

There will be serious degradation of environment, water will be polluted, turn the soil infertile, barren and degraded.

Economic crisis and environmental decay will seriously pervade the whole GBM basin spreading over thousands of square kilometers may be more than half of the country. A land of abundance of water will soon just cry for it.

Some suggestions
A fair and equitable share of water should be negotiated and agreed upon for the Brahmaputra, Ganges and rivers in Nepal. There should be mechanism of implementation and monitoring of flow (in cusecs or cumecs) measured at the source and at exit point at borders with Bangladesh.

China has plan to divert 200 billion meter cube of water from the Brahmaputra to its Yellow river. 200 billion cubic meter is equivalent to 6,000 cubic meter of water per second, which is, as said, our Dec-May (6 months) average total lean season flow rate. India, Bangladesh and China must negotiate and decide the sharing trilaterally.

Two dams in Nepal are under construction by India for hydropower generation and augmentation of water for rivers, perhaps mainly Ganges water flow of which a good part may eventually be diverted to the south through the link canal. Five more dams will be constructed by India. Nepal is contributing its precious land and water resource in its territory. As such it can rightly claim a fair share of hydroelectricity and water. India having been financing the project can claim a good share. What about Bangladesh? Our share should be agreed upon to earn legitimacy in the trilateral negotiation. The deal would ultimately be beneficial for us.

Sharing of waters of the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Nepalese and other rivers will be negotiated among India, Bangladesh, Nepal,. China and perhaps, Bhutan.

EIA study for the Indian river-linking project and Chinese unilateral diversion of the Brahmaputra river must be made available to Bangladesh in order to examine what it entails and what potential damages might occur and mitigation measures to be taken in dlower riparian Bangladesh. The damages must be quantified and expressed in monetary terms to determine as to who will bear the cost for mitigating potential damages, both economic and environmental, in Bangladesh. The upper riparian country holding the right is presumed to correct the damages outlined in mitigation measures of the EIA.

The Brahmaputra and the Ganges in the original layout and form with cool and wet nature are apprehended to turn hot, dry and hostile due to drastic withdrawal. Climate change caused by scarcity of water in the rivers and degraded environment will force the farmers to change to low-yielding dry farming which they are not familiar with. Over the years climate change will increase in intensity and severity. The Indian river-linking project will be directly responsible for the deplorable state of affairs emanating from the effects of withdrawal of waters and diversion of rivers.

Bangladesh may claim damages from the upper riparians as a result of causing this dismal economic crisis and creating severe environmental degradation of catastrophic magnitude and dimension. If the concerned upper riparian(s) undertake necessary measures for correction of damages as recommended in the 'mitigation measures' of the EIA report, it is by far the better solution.
The writer, a Professor of Civil Engineering at the World University of Bangladesh, is a water resources specialist.
  http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=89374



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Re: The Fifth InterFaith Bridge Builder's Awards: Honoring Peter Adriance



Dear All,
 
For International Peace, let us be InterFaith Bridge Builders. Let us be courageous enough to face the criticism and threat  to face them squarely and boldly for the ultimate peace of humanity in the world in our life time. They are destined for defeat as history is our guide to "Reason and conscience" as characterized in Article 1. of Universal Declaration of Human Rights of United Nations:   1,   http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html 
 
Regards.
Yours sincerely,
Golam F. Akhter
BdUsaHumanRightsCoalition
-------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 8:16 PM
Subject: The Fifth InterFaith Bridge Builder's Awards: Honoring Peter Adriance

InterFaith Bridge Builders Awards Countdown

Honoring Mr. Peter Adriance




Mr. Peter Adriance has served as NGO Liaison for the National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the U.S. since 1990, with a primary focus on issues of the environment and sustainable development.
The Fifth InterFaith Bridge Builder's Awards
Monday, June 1st
6:00-9:00 pm
including hors d'oeuvres reception and silent auction

Co-sponsored and Hosted by the Pope John Paul II Cultural Center
3900 Harewood Rd., NE
Washington, DC

"Faith and the Environment" Awards
will be presented to:

Mr. Peter Adriance

Greater Washington Interfaith Power and Light

Bhante Uparatina

and the Third IFC Founders' Award will be presented to

The Very Rev. Lloyd Casson


Tickets: $50 each
                                                      
Created in 1978, the InterFaith Conference (IFC) now brings together the Baha'i, Buddhist, Hindu, Islamic, Jain, Jewish, Latter-day Saints, Protestant, Roman Catholic, Sikh and Zoroastrian faith communities in this region to promote dialogue, understanding and a sense of community among persons of different faiths and to work cooperatively for social and economic justice in metropolitan Washington.

InterFaith Conference of Metropolitan Washington
For Ticket Information, please contact:

InterFaith Conference of Metropolitan Washington
100 Allison St., NW
Washington, District of Columbia 20011
202-234-6300
Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to akhtergolam@gmail.com by ifc@ifcmw.org.
InterFaith Conference of Metropolitan Washington | 100 Allison St., NW | Washington | DC | 20011


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

FW: [Diagnose] FW: [ALOCHONA] Engineers, Doctors are corrupted!!! _ Minister Syed Ashraf



Sir dasd asdasd,
 
You are quite missing the point, quite misunderstanding, and making quite silly talks. The point I mentioned is that the degree of involvement in corruption of the professionals (Sir: do you understand the definition of the professional?) versus the degree of corruption of the politicians of the country.  Bangladesh is a country where most people are corrupted, regardless of the type or trade of work they do.
 
Can you tell me Sir, why it is happening in Bangladesh so seriously, and not in many countries of the world?
 
Do you think Bangladesh has no laws, regulations, acts, procedures, or rules to stop corruption?
 
Do you think that the Bangladeshis are different from the other people of the world and so do corruptions?
 
Sir: Provide your answers but listen to my explanations below.
 
Politicians do run the country and professionals do work physically for the country according to the rules, regulations, and the directions that are set and controlled by the politicians. If the politicians were fare and not corrupted, the professionals could not do any corruptions. Bangladesh has almost all laws, rules, and regulations to stop corruptions but the enforcers of these laws, rules, and regulations  are the politicians. Most all the politicians are so corrupted that they intentionally do not enforce those laws, rules, and regulations on them and on the professionals such that they themselves do not get caught; and that is the main reason why Bangladeshis are so corrupted. While the parents are corrupted, how can you expect that the children will be fare? Expecting it is nothing but just nonsense, and I believe you definitely fall in that category, otherwise you would not deliver a non-sensical lecture. You would understand the reason, and would not be so bad mouthed.
 
Bangladeshis are not at all different from the good people of the other countries of the world.  Thousands of Bangladeshi professionals living and very efficiently working in abroad; who definitely have proven this fact. Tell me Sir, how many politicians went to abroad and proved in the same way as the professionals did? In most countries, Bangladeshi professionals are highly regarded as very high class professionals. How that could happen, Sir, if your bad mouth would stay right?
 
You are not from BUET and that is why you do not know. When Bangladesh engulfed in corrupted education, even in that time, BUET remained quite out of corruption in education. BUET is still like that and so all board of educations use the BUET model to eradicate educational corruption.  Corruption in the secondary and higher secondary education has gone way down after following BUET.  You must live in the moon and so is so cynical and ill informed.
 
The truth is when the engineers go out from the University to work place, the environment there created by the politicians of the country infect these engineers. Anyone who wants to resist is dealt with heavy handed by the ones already there. So, either they have to accept for existence or leave, and probably to end up in the abroad.
 
All other professionals have more or less the same fate. May be little more or little less. Despite all these odds, all professionals are providing al lot of real service for the country. All these buildings, roads, towns, cities, schools, colleges, markets, bridges, and all kinds of physical infrastructure have been built 100 folds since the independence. If professionals would not work, how all these happened? On the other hand, see the political conditions of the country. How many times Bangladesh had military takeovers? Why if politicians were not corrupted and useless bunch of hoarders? Did any political improvements happened since the independence? Will never happen until the politicians do not stop doing corruptions!!! Whereas the politicians of many many countries  of the world can be uncorrupted real politicians for the benefit of the country and people, why bangladeshi politicians can not be so? What are the reasons?
 
Sir: think about all these and find the real reason. When the water of a well stinks because a cat fell into it and rotten, would taking away all water of the well stop the stink or taking away rotten cat will make water someday stink free? Think please.



To: dhakamails@yahoogroups.com; diagnose@yahoogroups.com; faridhkhan@gmail.com; iqbalg@bigfoot.com; hasimaju@yahoo.com; kazi.hasan@aes.com; khabor@yahoogroups.com; Diagnose@yahoogroups.com
From: amerdesh@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:42:55 -0700
Subject: Re: [Diagnose] FW: [ALOCHONA] Engineers, Doctors are corrupted!!! _ Minister Syed Ashraf
 
It is very very clear that all universities are now the factories of making irresponsible & corrupted educated doctors engineers & other faculty educated graduates,
1) The Teachers are doing nast politics but are not learning for earning update knowledge education to provide the students update knowledge educations, not providing correct lessons & not taking regular classes & examination in time.  The students are getting untimely at lat students back dated knowledge less education for receiving certificates.
 After completion their so called study in the university they are not efficient to perform their duty honestly & correctly in their work fields. Only they can know chapabaji works as worthless & nonsense persons & can do works harassing the people for earning illegal money & power. 
Accordingly it can be said by Minister Syed Ashraf
that Engineers, Doctors are corrupted!!! _
So the people Tax & Vat payers of Bangladesh are asking Minister Syed Ashraf son /of Syed Nazrul Islam the first acting president of Bangladesh that he must take legal necessary action to do modification in education section in education courses & in education teaching staffs for providing correct update knowledge education to the students to educating them as honest skilled educated doctors, engineers & other faculty graduates so that they can honest efficient work persons in their work fields.
 

--- On Mon, 18/5/09, K. Raisuddin <Kraisuddin@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: K. Raisuddin <Kraisuddin@hotmail.com>
Subject: [Diagnose] FW: [ALOCHONA] Engineers, Doctors are corrupted!!! _ Minister Syed Ashraf
To: "dhakamails@yahoogroups.com" <dhakamails@yahoogroups.com>, "Diagnose YG" <diagnose@yahoogroups.com>, "Farid Khan" <faridhkhan@gmail.com>, "Ghulam Iqbal" <iqbalg@bigfoot.com>, "Hasinur Rahman (Dr.)" <hasimaju@yahoo.com>, "kazi.hasan@aes.com" <kazi.hasan@aes.com>, "Khobor YG" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>
Received: Monday, 18 May, 2009, 4:26 PM


How does he know about the Engineering Universities, Medical Collages and Agricultural Universities to produce educated corrupted engineers, doctors and agriculturists? Did he study in any of the institutions? Does by any means he attached himself with any research work dealing with what institutions make how much corruptions?
 
For my entire life, I am hearing that the Engineering University is a place of model education. No corruptions did ever touch this institution while many other institutions, even a lot of them surrounding it had a lot of corruptions, either among the students or among the administrations.
 
Starting from the Pakistan time, years after the years, all kinds of junk politicians, would create their cadres among the students of the Universities and of the colleges, with a view to motivating them to ill purposes, but those screwed up politicians could not touch the grounds of the institutions of real learning such as the Engineering University and Colleges, PG and Medical colleges, and the Agricultural University and the colleges; for a main reason that the highest class students go in those institutions, with a sole ambition of  studying, learning, and for becoming the legitimate future professionals. No one goes there to be politicians.
 
Anybody please just tell me an absolute truth, who are more corrupted in Bangladesh? The politicians? or the Professionals like engineers, doctors, health professionals,  and agriculturists?
 
I am not saying that there are no corrupted professionals or there are no honest politicians. All I am saying that if you make a statistical measurement, you will see the statistical curve of the measurement will go in opposite directions for the Bangladeshi professionals and the Bangladeshi politicians.  Thirty years ago or before, people could feel the contributions of the politicians but today people feel that the country will run a lot better without any politicians. Politician are the ones who are spoiling the country by all means. But if you observe for the same period, you will see that Bangladesh could not produce the food for 65 to 70 millions people of the country. A number of people would die by hunger. Today Bangladesh is feeding 150 million people with a lot more and lot better food supply. Who made this to happen? Politicians or the agriculturists, engineers, and professionals of the host of disciplines? Thirty years ago, people would left and right immaturely, child and mother mortality was at the peak. Today all kinds of mortalities due to disease and disadvantage have reduced drastically. Who made it happen? The politicians or the doctors, health professionals, and health researchers? Thirty years ago or before, how many buildings were there to live or work, and how many roads were there to drive? How many today? Were all those built just by the politicians? Engineers, designers, constructors, mentors etc. all worked hard to make all these happen.
 
If all professionals were only corrupted, then how all these achievements happened? Please provide the information about how much political achievements have happened in last several decades?



To: aushtock@yahoogroup s.com; world_peace_ movement@ yahoogroups. com; mukto-mona@yahoo. com; mukto_mona@yahoo. com; alochona@yahoogroup s.com; sonarbangladesh@ yahoogroups. com; mukto-mona@yahoogro ups.com; voice-of-south@ yahoogroups. com; odhora@yahoogroups. com; muslim-professional s@yahoogroups. com; bangladesh-zindabad @yahoogroups. com; amra-bangladeshi@ yahoogroups. com; notun_bangladesh@ yahoogroups. com
CC: editor@amadershomoy .com; editor@amardeshbd. com; editor@bangladeshto day.com; editor@dailynoyadig onto.com; editor@ittefaq. com; editor@jugantor. com; editor@manabzamin. net; editor@prothom- alo.com; editor@thedailystar .net; editor@newagebd. com; editor@nation. ittefaq.com; editor@shamokal. com; editor@newstoday- bd.com
From: engrmhkhan@yahoo. com
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 12:08:27 -0700
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Engineers, Doctors are corrupted!!! _ Minister Syed Ashraf
 

Dear Brothers & Sisters,

 

Greetings from the heart of Bangladesh.

 

We are shocked after reading the news on The Daily Amardesh. Please find the link below,

 

http://www.amardeshbd.com/dailynews/detail_newsindex.php? NewsID=224112&NewsType=bistarito&SectionID=home

 

According to the news, LGRD minister Syed Ashraful Islam has made comments that Engineering Universities, Medical Collages and Agricultural Universities produces educated corrupted engineers, doctors and agriculturist.

 

Are we really non-sense? We all know who pressurize, order, control and collect money through engineers, doctors and agriculturist?

 

The answer is very easy most of them are the backbencher ministers, MPs, businessmen, contractors, political leaders etc. I am 100% sure if Honorable Minister wants LGRD ministry will be less corrupted ministry of BD Gov within next 5 years.

 

In Bangladesh, the most meritorious students, the proud of nation study Engineering, Medical Science and General Sciences in Engineering Universities, Medical Collages, DU, JU, CU, RU, KU, SUST etc. But relatively less meritorious students i.e. UNO, DC, OC, SP, Secretary and officers of administration, police etc has been enjoying enormous power and wealth than those bright students of nation. How farce! How stupidity!!

 

Hope, honorable Minister will think about the comments again and will find out the real causes of corruption.

 

Thanks & regards,


Engr. Mosharraf H. Khan
 
 
 

.

__


Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! Try it!

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Dash Truck Arms



Imagine that the Indian government out of their good will decided to
prosecute all those from their Intelligence agencies who are responsible to create 'Shanti bahini' in Chittagong area. Not only that the Indian government decided to release those Intelligence chiefs names public and send them to the open court.
Another scenario, Indian goverment finds the names of the culprits who deliberately refused to hand over the 'three bigha' because of their culprit intention and prosecute them. Not only that Indian government censures the names of the idiots of Bangladesh who hands over the 'Barubari' before getting the three bigha.
It is never going to happen. Period.
Think for a minute, if current US government decides to investigate all CIA activities especially during the republican era and prosecute them.
Every country has its intelligence agencies and they cover some acts that relates to their national interest. Only exception is Bangladesh where the government is soo much in love with their counter parts is that they are going after the national institutions and basically destroying them. This Government has a lot of successes in its belt already. It has successfully destroyed the BDR with the help of their international friends. Now it is just time to destroy the Intelligence agencies and then all three branches of the military.
We are seeing the act of  Mir Jafar, Raj Dullob, Rai Durlabh, Jagat Seth, and Umi Chand being repeated again. Gosethi Begum is already doing her work.



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] RAHUL GANDHI IS NOT A PETER PAN ANY MORE



RAHUL GANDHI IS NOT A PETER PAN ANY MORE

 

By Frank Huzur in New Delhi

 

I'm youth, I'm joy, I'm a little bird that has broken out of the egg. These words of legendary Scottish Novelist James Matthews Barrie were ringing in the ear of Indian pollsters and Pundits with resonant frequency by the early afternoon of 16 May. The verdict over 15th Lok Sabha elections was trickling in thick and fast. Citadel after citadel, bastion after bastion of fanciful imagination was dying instant death in the shooting Mercury. Many myths were raveling fast, and one of the greatest myth was unraveling of The Rahul Gandhi factor. The factor fast spread into a phenomenon over the next 48 hours as the Congress Party, the grand old party of India, clenched its fist over its most impressive tally in the past two-and-half-decade. Rahul Gandhi, apparently, had propelled the fledgling Congress party and its pre-poll allies to striking distance of magic figure of 272. The Congress was grinning like Cheshire cat with 206 seats in the lower house of Indian Parliament, quite a feat by any conceivable standards.
 
Rahul Gandhi was no better than Peter Pan with baby teeth to army of political astrologers in the rival camp of principal opposition party, the BJP and its constituent of NDA..
 
The wily fox of the Hindu nationalist party took potshots at Rahul Gandhi's political wisdom many a times in course of over 45 days electioneering saying he was merely an exaggerated stereotype of a boastful and careless boy like the original character of Barrie of the Neverland. He can only fly, not land on his own, was the constant

refrain in ivory towers of Opposition. When leading trend halted a little over 200 in the seat tally, shock, horror, cynicism and disbelief was written all over the face of vanquished, a large army of losers in the battle for hearts and minds of over 700 million Indian voters. Rahul Gandhi, 38 years old general secretary of the Congress party had succeeded in unfettering himself from his baby-tooth image.
 
The great grand son of India's first Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru had defied pollsters and pundits. He has handed over an unprecedented verdict to the Congress Party. Courage is the thing. All goes if courage goes. The grand revival of the party in largest battleground state of Uttar Pradesh is attributed to this very dash of heir apparent to Manmohan Singh's office, as and when the transition is solemnized. It's a matter of years now, though blushing, dimpled cheek Rahul would have grapevine in India and abroad guessing to death at this silly games.

Was there an air of anticipation that the Congress party will taste sweet sound of electoral revival in 2009 Parliamentary polls? When the sealed ballot boxes were being carried from strong-rooms across the country into hundreds of thousands of counting centre, the Bhartiya Janta Party Prime Minister-in-waiting Lal Kishanchand Advani might well have heaved a huge sigh of relief over the beginning of final countdown to consummation of his ultimate dream. The long-running dream to become the 18th Prime Minister of India! Alas, it was not destined to happen!
 
It took less than a couple of hours before the principal architect of much controversial Ram Rath Yatra, creator of Hindutva brand of politics, felt the flames of bridges to 7 Race Course Road burning.
 
There was no blaze of camera flashing high and low on his shiny, bald head and bushy moustache. The former deputy Prime Minister of India had well begun his walk into the sunset while the Sun was still striving to shoots its sizzling arrows. The BJP was distant second in the hot race with only 116 Lok Sabha seats, its motley group of allies groaning in deep pain. Gone with the hot wind were high-flying ambitions of ruling India of Dalit chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh Mayawati and dozen of regional matriarch and patriarch, including J.Jayalalithaa of AIADMK, Lalu Prasad Yadav of Rashtriya Janta Dal, Sharad Pawar of Nationalist Congress Party, Chandrababu Naidu of Telugu Desam Party and few more, including Samajwadi Party supreme Mulayam Singh Yadav, who until the other day were blushing in eternal hope of cornering the spoils of power.

So, what pulled the race in favour of the Congress Party? No matter what middle-age and old-age poll skeptics might say, the 15th General Elections have been all about assertion of Young Indian voters.
Youngistan voted for the Congress-led coalition government in firm, decisive manner. Indian youth set a precedent by turning out in strength all over the country out of fear of being called 'Pappu the truant'. They gave thumbs down to extremist of Right and Left wing parties and their divisive, complex set of policies. They wrinkled
their nose during campaigns at the scaring talks of Ram temple and caste-based reservation. They frowned upon tradition-weary conducts of their father and grand-father, mother and grandmother who spurred them until the eleventh hour to hold on to caste and religious lines while exercising the adult franchise. It is a vote against century-old-Indian tradition of following caste and religious kinship. It is a mandate against communalists, demagogue, rabble-rouser and stormy petrels. One may ask the after-effects of this sizzling mandate to Varun Gandhi, another Gandhi scion in the BJP, and it would be loud and clear where the game ended.
 
Rahul Gandhi volunteered to campaign in over 100 Lok Sabha constituencies. In shining white Khadi shalwar Kameez, the Harvard-educated general secretary of the Congress spoke in simple, straight and lucid tongue. He is not the one to raise his voice even in face of vituperative provocation and insulting insinuation. His feet were firmly on the ground, his smile never disappeared in the rising Mercury on the campaign trails from Pondicherry to Patna. When the party economist Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was ridiculed in public by principal rival L K Advani, Rahul Gandhi pitched in his inimitable style, throwing some sensible guards to the BJP Prime
Ministerial candidate. He approached every question with an open mouth and collected head during three much-watched and scrutinized press
conferences he took during the campaigning.
 
Bombay attacks in the dying evening of 26 November 2008 had set the adrenaline rushing roughshod in Indian political corridor. The barbaric tragedy and consequent bloodbath painted the Indian social and political landscape in blood-red colour. The country was still in the middle of Assembly elections-Madhya Pradesh, Chhatisgarh,Rajasthan and Delhi, and the tension was palpable in the air. The terror was an issue, and it was up for maximum exploitation once more at the hustings.
 
The BJP in opposition hit back hard in its characteristic style by splashing advertisement with images of its stalwart former Prime Minister and Prime Minister in waiting LK Advaniin national dailies, with election symbol of Lotus in prominence, asking Indian voters to vote out the ruling UPA government for its failure in pre-empting Bombay tragedy. At a time pollsters and pundits were predicting clean sweep for the BJP in Delhi and Rajasthan and other states. The Congress stormed to power in these states in middleof the army operations at Hotel Taj and Trident in Mumbai. For once, the BJP failed to convince the average voter about its indispensability in preventing terror attacks on Indian soil.
 
The offensive, all-option-open stance adopted by the Congress generalissimo led by Pranab Mukherjee virtually brought two nuclear-armed arch-rival New Delhi-Islamabad to the brink of catastrophic war. In face of everything, despite much prodding by Hindu Nationalist forces to point the finger at over 175 million Muslims in India for its complicity in occurrence of the horrendous tragedy, the Congress party didn't buckle under pressure. The mother-son duo of Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi didn't bite the bait.
 
Not a single Muslim of India was called into question for the tragedy. Rather, the issue acquired international hue, as New Delhi put Islamabad into tight spot by providing with credible evidence of complicity of its own citizens, what with the arrest of Azmal Amir Qasab.The artillery fires didn't ring across the border, war didn't break out between India and Pakistan as one would predict in the first 72 hours of the tragedy. But, the agenda for General elections just a couple of months ahead was set right out there. The Congress had won the first round of battle of wits with its principal opposition, BJP.
 
It marched confidently to consolidate the further lead once springtime gave into searing heat of May.The Congress party chose simple, direct action campaign punches to keep its opponent fretting and fuming. Terrorism was integral to virtually every single campaign speech of Sonia Gandhi, Congress President, Rahul Gandhi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. When L K Advani whipped up public sentiment by describing the Prime Minister as most weakest Prime Minister ever, the one who can't take single decision without consent from Sonia Gandhi (Advani was compulsive in attacking Prime Minister with almost frenetic frequency—All decisions of Prime Minister office are taken at 10 Janpath, the residence of Sonia Gandhi), he was given lesson in 'weakness and strength' by all the three star campaigners of the Congress—Rahul Gandhi didn't flinch in joining the issue as he spoke about Advani's strength during Kandhar hijacking crisis when the then NDA government released Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sayeed in December of 1999. Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh evoked mass sympathy in asking direct question to the crowd as to who was weak, Manmohan Singh for all his sagacity and audacity in going for commando operations in Bombay attacks or LK Advani who couldn't control a series of terrorist attacks during his tenure as Home Minister of India.
 
The three-pronged attack had its direct bearing on the final upshot of the elections.Now that the same dispensation which cornered Pakistan in ring of International diplomacy has stormed to power, will there be quick respite in the frozen turbulence between New Delhi and Islamabad. It is a wishful thinking, because the Congress government has been famous or infamous for driving hard bargain with Islamabad. Islamabad wouldn't be much pleased with the results, as Manmohan Singh

government can't take unilateral decisions to resume the bilateral dialogue or to lift the dark veil of mutual distrust anytime sooner for variety of reasons at work. In the past couple of decades, issues dealing with Pakistan and Muslims in India have been cornerstone of Hindu nationalist parties like the BJP and Shiv Sena stoking hysteriain public. Ahead of sending warm signals of bonhomie and reconciliation, New Delhi will think many times, as it already has set the benchmark in asking for comprehensive action on 26/11 suspects, now in custody of the Pakistan Investigation agencies. Peaceniks across the borders might not have much to rejoice in near future. More than anything else, common refrain on streets of India and Pakistan remains that the Congress created Pakistan, and the Pakistan in turncreated Hindu nationalist party like the BJP. The Congress in turn takes potshots at the BJP by driving home the point that it was her much revered leader Indira Gandhi, grandmother of Rahul Gandhi, who divided Pakistan on 16 December 1971. For now, Indo-Pak relations will remain in deep freeze.
 
The BJP Prime Ministerial contender Advani would tolerate insinuations from Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh. Catching a tartar in Rahul Gandhi, all of 38 years of age, was fast turning out to be a nightmarish experience for the octogenarian contender. He appeared rattled in quite a few public press appearance, and it furtherconvinced free-floating electorate of his vulnerability to lead the nation where half the population in over one billion are less than 35 years of age.
 
If you once forfeit the confidence of your fellow citizens, you can never regain their respect and esteem. The sermon of Abraham Lincoln has had stupefying impact. Rahul Gandhi was virtually appealing to young Indians in these lines—you may fool all of thepeople some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time; but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.
 
Rahul's estranged cousin, Varun Gandhi was not derided for his anti-Muslim speech in Pilibhit (Varun won his seat though) by the BJP. In contrast, BJP poll managers, including the party president praised him to heights, deluding themselves of the peace-loving, secular credentials of majority of Indian voters. Varun Gandhi won his Lok Sabha seat, a maiden victory to give him a gallery view of Parliament proceedings in the world largest democracy. His solo victory buried his party's desperate quest for power crutches for the next five years. He became a hate mascot much like Narendra Modi has become outside Gujarat. In Uttar Pradesh, home to 160 million Indians, the most populous province, Varun's vitriolic address scared secular voters. Far from polarizing caste-ridden Hindu society, it could result in more than couple of seats more for the BJP. Indeed, there is a thin line between politics and theatricals. The esteem of religion for the BJP politics might have been profitable in the past; the principles of it are troublesome, as it appears now.
 
Uttar Pradesh was, by all accounts, the battleground state, where the
contest was multi-pronged as usual. While state Chief Minister Mayawati of BSP was aiming to become the first untouchable Prime Minister, Mulayam Singh Yadav-Akhilesh Yadav-led Samajwadi Party was targeting huge slice of 80 seats to push for the ultimate bargain in the power-sharing arrangement. The Congress, like the BJP, was nowhere in the reckoning until the afternoon of May 16-the counting day..
 
The Rahul Factor silently built up a public opinion, which left everyone scratching their hairs in disbelief and dismay. The increase in the Congress tally, overall 21 seats, over 20 percent vote-share, busted the myth of Third Front and Fourth Front. Didn't Mark Twain once say public opinion is everything, it is held in reverence and it cansettle everything? Some say it is the voice of God. The Congress was in moribund condition in UP for the past 20 years. Rahul Gandhi has rejuvenated it with his smiles and simplicity. His is the voice of god among disparate crowd of congressmen, who until this election didn't have any idea whether they have a winnable contender in their midst.

Small wonder the party had to bring in outsider like former Indian cricket captain Mohammad Azharuddin all the way from Banjara Hills of Hyderabad to contest from Moradabad-city of brass, wherefrom he comfortably romped home.
 
Rahul Gandhi has shown the way to the Congress in Uttar Pradesh, where the party is still low on grassroots workers, no organizational structure, not the least where its state party president Rita Bahuguna couldn't even win her own seat from Allahabad, the holy city for Hindus on the confluence of Ganges, Yamuna and Saraswati-the river consigned to history.
 
If anyone could stem in the raging Rahul storm in Uttar Pradesh, it was father-son socialist duo of Samajwadi Party. Only the Cycle could confront the marauding advance of 'Hand', as Akhilesh Yadav, another foreign educated silken tongue charmer, all of 36 years of age, kept his flock together. Muslims in Uttar Pradesh were up in arms over his father extending olive branch to former BJP Chief Minister Kalyan Singh, (It was under the Chief Minister Kalyan Singh's tenure in December of 1992 that Babri Mosque was demolished). Nevertheless, Muslims, a sizeable presence in the state, maintained their two-decade-long loyalty and belief in secular credentials and manifesto of Samajwadi Party. Akhilesh himself criss-crossed thestate, stepping the cylinder on BJP and Congress rivals. He reaps the rewards now with 23 seats, which ultimately makes his party the third largest party in Indian parliament after the Congress and the BJP.
 
However, the sudden rise in fortune of the Congress party in UP doesn't warrant any power-sharing opportunity for the Samajwadi Party, as it is once more unwanted in the Government. The party is extending outside support to the UPA. However, Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh were in double mind whether to ask the Samajwadi Party to join the government for its gargantuan service in saving the UPA government in last week of July over the much trumpeted India-America Civil Nuclear Deal. The good or bad thing about Indian democracy is it is not neat,orderly or quiet. It requires a certain relish for confusion like Molly Evins would have us believe.
 
The sharks in the Congress party wouldn't want to share power with their principal rivals in the battleground state of UP. Mark it, it is not the BJP, but the Samajwadi Party, which has been conquering this most vital state for years, trouncing both the BJP and the Congress.
 
Only Mayawati, with her upside-down social engineering, coaxing Dalit voters with Brahmins at the highest rung in the caste pyramid, has managed to topple Samajwadi Party's bastion of Yadav and Muslim in recent past.
Rahul Gandhi wants to conquer, or to be more politically correct, devour both these bulwarks. The politics of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, where caste allegiance still reign supreme, is the politics of grievance. The phenomenal rise of caste-based political stalwarts like Lalu Prasad, Mulayam and Maywati and Nitish Kumar (incumbent chief minister of Janta Dal-United who swept Bihar in alliance with the BJP) is much attributed to the Congress' flip-flop with backward and under-privileged castes during its over 40 years hegemony until ghost of Mandal Commission rose like Phoneix under the wings of former Prime Minister Vishawanath Pratap Singh. VP singh died the same evening after prolonged illness when Bombay attacks was numbing the entire Indian nation.
 
 The news of his passing away couldn't garner an inch of space in the national media for apparent reasons, not terrorist attacks of monumental proportion, but entrenched enmity and indifference towards the executioner of Mandal Commission reports amongst power elite in Indian media corporations.
 
VP Singh triggered a bomb of 'Identity Politics' in Indian politics, especially low-caste Identity politics, and the battle doesn't seem to be over. All the talk of revival of national parties, with much improved showing of the Congress doesn't look more convincing, as there are regional parties ruling the roost in more states than thoseruled and controlled by the BJP and the Congress.
 
If the Congress has to recapture its lost glory in UP and become a monolithic force once more, it would want to bury the fortune of Samajwadi Party, like Rashtriya Janta Dal of Lalu Prasad Yadav in Bihar (Lalu is a decimated force, with only four LS seats this time and no ministerial berth this time for the former Railway Minister whomade all the good noises for his sterling performance and great turnaround in revenue collections).
 
Rahul Gandhi is firm and clear on waging further battles for clean sweep in Uttar Pradesh. He has tasted blood. He is hungry for more ahead of next Assembly elections a couple of years later. Which is why he is not falling for ministerial berth, let alone Prime Minister office despite high-decibel prostration by a vast crowd of obsequious congressmen about whom the heir apparent to the highest office isneatly aware of. He is invincible in Amethi, the Lok Sabha constituency he has won for second consecutive terms. He didn't have to nail the tents and canopy in Amethi to ensure his victory. His apolitical sister Priyanka Gandhi Vadhera with her affability and charming glibness of tongue ensured he should visit only three times during entire campaign. Priyanka turned out to be a top grosser with not only masses but also with media. With her sharp sense of humour and quick repartee, she baffled Saffron poster boy Narendra Modi with her much-lapped retort over 'Congress budhiya party ha—Priyanka gudiya hain—Priyanka had shot back, 'do I look like a budhiya-old woman?)
 
Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason. This dictum has been true in much progressive and educated society of the West. In certain pockets of India, too, voters have come to realize that they need to vote against, not always vote for the same party or candidate. Little wonder, there are going to be about 100 fresh faces in 15th Lok Sabha. And, most of the fresh faces are younglings who belong to Rahul Gandhi's Congress party. What brought about this turnaround where the nation is debating about the youngest-ever Parliament? Needless to say, Manmohan Singh-Sonia Gandhi combine pulled in all socks in introducing pro-farm policies like the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, a $ 5 billion rural work scheme, which provided for 100-day-job for landless and deprived plebeians in nook and corner of the country.
 
The impact was immediate and invigorating in over 200 districts, including Raebarelly, the Sonia Gandhi Lok Sabha constituency, as it generated social equity outside stock-market crazy shining India.
 
Rahul Gandhi carrying a scalpel and saucer full of soil on his shoulder became a Kodak moment for television-hooked viewers. Rahul took pride in serving the poor of India as he was categorical in his tours that he wants to see and experience India from the eyes of the poor, he wants to take forward the poor of the country. When the moment of waiving farm loan to the tune of $ 15 billion arrived, all hell broke loose over offering sop to unproductive India as it was in its scope, coverage and financial cost, Farm Loan waiver was the most ambitious scheme undertaken by any Indian governments post-Independence. The scheme benefited over 40 million small and marginal farmers across the country, who were doomed to kill themselves. In the last decade alone, over 1.80 lakh Indian farmers have killed themselves out of penury and debt.
 
Not only does Rahul talk about poor or those below poverty line (rechristened in Indian political discourse as BPL), he practices his philosophy. He slept with a dalit family on rickety mat in Amethi, the very act which gave sleepless nights to self-styled Godmother queen of Untouchables, reigning chief minister Mayawati. The cries shot through the roof when he invited visiting British Foreign secretary David Miliband to breathe in the breeze of a Dalit village late last year in December. The opposition, including the BJP, had ridiculed the move by firing salvoes like Rahul Gandhi is taking British Foreign Minister on 'poverty pornography show'. Nothing of such callous labeling irked the young Gandhi, nor did it deter him from practicing his 'Aam Aadmi' creed.
 
He is making friends everywhere, from dark hamlet in India to treasury benches in House of Commons. He also has friends in Pakistan, as Imran Khan, legendary cricketer-turned-politician, has praised Rahul on numerous occasions, and has gone on to suggest Bilawal Bhutto to take a leaf out of Gandhi's books.
 
This was a masterstroke in clinching a battle for the future, and consolidating the faith of rural India. In order to become the master, the politician poses as the servant. Manmohan Singh-Sonia Gandhi duo played their cards, and Rahul did the rest of the job with his charming countenance, boyish talk applying the remedy. Of all the remedies Rahul Gandhi applied was the decision to go solo in Bihar andUttar Pradesh. He is a mental explorer like a true Gemini. He is born (June 19, 1970) in the zodiac of John F. Kennedy, the charming prince of American democracy. Like he has shown his mettle in being a truest dark horse in this round, he is good at disguising his true motives and real desires.. He can really twist Indian voters, in coming times, like a pretzel with his mental karate, get them to agree with him andlove him.
 
As Indian political discourse enters into frenzy over whether Rahul Gandhi makes better politician than his father Rajeev Gandhi, former Prime Minister of India, even the most indifferent political creature on Indian soil nowadays swears by one thing—Rahul Gandhi has arrived on national consciousness, and he has arrived fast, with a bang. The Grand Old Party of India, the Congress, the very party ridiculed byopposition of socialist and communal hues in the past couple of decades for its dynasty worship—is no longer a droopy bird in a cage with its wings clipped. It is a free bird, its feathers and wings fluttering in the summer breeze. Hail the Rahul Gandhi, the actual game-changer with vivid political imagination and restless energy.
 
He is restless to conquer more and more, as his ambition is limitless.
 
Frank Huzur is an author, poet and journalist based out of New Delhi-London. His forthcoming book, Imran Versus Imran-An Untold Story (The official biography of Imran Khan) is due in few months from Falcon & Falcon, London, www.falcon-falcon..co.uk. He is available at frankhuzur@falcon-falcon.co.uk )



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___