Banner Advertiser

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

[ALOCHONA] BNP minister Hafiz was mysteriously quiet while in power - now started talking



Actually it's not only Hafiz, it's the full cabal of BNP-Jamaat administration. They were completely silent when they were in power, now all of a sudden they are super patriots like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld etc.


Source: http://www.ittefaq.com/content/2009/06/17/print0535.htm

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] BDR Carnage: Mobile Call List of Pintu and Jamaat's Razzak Disappeared




Source: http://www.ittefaq.com/content/2009/06/17/print0527.htm



[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com





__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Indian BSF detains Bangladesh photographer Shahidul Alam: Drik News /Picture Library


Indian BSF detains photographer Shahidul Alam: Drik  
Tue, Jun 16th, 2009 8:51 pm BdST  

2d83fd2.jpg

 


Alam

Dhaka, June 16 (bdnews24.com)—Indian Border Security Force have detained photographer Shahidul Alam, founder of Drik Gallery and chief editor of photo agency DrikNEWS, a colleague said on Tuesday.

Drik editor Azizur Rahim told bdnews24.com Alam up at the Rowmari-Sahapara border in Kurigram at around 5pm and were holding him on the Indian side.

"The BSF guards on duty had first asked him to come over to the Indian side and then detained him," said a Drik statement.

Alam was working on a National Geographic project based on the Brahmaputra, it said.

His two colleagues, who were accompanying him, are on the Bangladeshi side of the border and have so far failed to establish any contact with him.
 
Source : http://bdnews24.com/details.php?cid=2&id=87449&hb=2

[ALOCHONA] Fw: Fwd: Shahidul Alam has been released!

-----Forwarded Message-----
>From: Rahnuma Ahmed <>
>Sent: Jun 16, 2009 3:51 PM
>To: Robin Khundkar <>
>Subject: Fwd: Shahidul Alam has been released!
>
>sorry robin, forgot to fwd this to you! thanks 4 everything, hugs/r
>
>
>Dear friends,
>
>Shahidul was released by the Indian Border Security Forces about half an
>hour ago. I waited until I had spoken to him before letting all of you know.
>He is now at the BDR base camp completing formalities. His two Drik
>colleagues, Sumeru and Kashem, who had been anxiously waiting for him on
>this side of the border, are on their way to the camp.
>
>He sounded as cheerful and as spirited as ever. Many thanks to all of you,
>for your tremendous support, concern and love.
>
>in solidarity/r
>
>pls fwd this message to those who i've forgotten to include in the list.
>many thnx.

------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: [ALOCHONA] Fw: [chottala.com] Zia That I Knew: A Flashback



Not only this, how Zia was made the Deputy Chief of Army Staff by the Governement of Bangladesh
in 1972 if he was court martialed in 1971 ? There is a limit of mindless lies !   
 


To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: Anwariqbal@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:39:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Fw: [chottala.com] Zia That I Knew: A Flashback



Mr. Ghosh;
Where did you get that information? If Zia was "court martialed" and removed from 'Z' force, who ran the 'Z' force after him. The name 'Z' comes from the first initial of his name, without him, there will be no 'Z' force.

Many of you cannot stand the fact that Zia was one of the leading freedom fighters who led our independence war as most of the so called "freedom fighting politicians" were busy doing R&R in Kolkata.If you are a Bangladeshi, instead of slandering his reputation, at least you can show some respect for his participation in the liberation war.

Tell me this, if he was indeed court martialed, what made the country decorate him with a "Bir Uttam" title after all?
Anwar

--- On Fri, 6/12/09, Aniruddha Ghose <anrdghs@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Aniruddha Ghose <anrdghs@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Fw: [chottala.com] Zia That I Knew: A Flashback
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 7:19 AM



Can you please tell me why Zia was "Court Martialed" and later on removed from Z force during the War of Independence!!!!


From: Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo.com>
To: Dhaka Mails <dhakamails@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 5:26:54 AM
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Fw: [chottala.com] Zia That I Knew: A Flashback



--- On Thu, 5/28/09, chottalasultan@ yahoo.com <chottalasultan@ yahoo.com> wrote:


Dear Mr. Abu Obaid Chowdhury,

    Thanks for sharing this rich article with the community!  I salute your heroic contribution to the liberation of Bangladesh .  Your graphic description of the valiant actions of Zia and other freedom fighters should be recorded in text and in motion pictures. 

    Yes, indeed I respectfully recall the fondest memory of Shaheed Zia of Bangladesh .  I heard his repeated announcement in Chittagong "I declare the independence of Bangladesh.. ....,"  later modified "I declare the independence of Bangladesh under the direction of our great leader Bangobandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman ......,";  "I call upon all peace loving countries of the world to come forward to stop the genocide being committed by the Pakistani military on unarmed Bengalis..."  "I instruct all able bodied men to gather at Laldighir Par and follow instructions from captains Bhuiya, Shamsher, and Khalequzzaman, and Major Rafiq on our preparation for resisting the enemy....."  "Protishod, Protishod Amra Neboi...." 

     No Bangladeshi could ignore the roaring Tiger's call for bearing arms for his/her motherland; women, children, and octogenarian elders were fired up hearing this voice of hope and liberty on Chittagong Radio (when all radio and newspapers were silent) when all Bangladeshis were waiting in dismay and for directions.  I was fortunate to have gone to Laldighir Par along with other Junior Cadet Corps (JCC) and Fauzderhat Cadet College (FCC) cadets to answer that call!  On March 28 at dusk, we faced three truck loads of scouting sailors from Pakistani war ship PNS Babar at Katcha Rastar Matha (the junction of Dhaka Trunk Road and road to EPR Chittagong HQ in Halishahar).  All of them were dead from firing from the EPR jawans on the rooftop of Pakistan Radio (warehouse?) building roof and from the ditch behind Nahar Manzil at Katcha Rastar Matha.  Approx. 3 to 5 EPR jawans were also shaheed in the fight.  The three destroyed Paki truck remained on the land across from the Radio building, and this spot became the vengeance point of Paki military after they took over Chittagong with reinforcement from Comilla and Dhaka cantonments starting on March 29!   On the 26th March, the nation tasted freedom, and the journey continued for a free Bangladesh on December 16th 1971--a sterling feat--achieved by all Bangladeshi civilian and military freedom fighters in the history of world in achieving independence in less than one year of war!!!

     Zia was a disciplined and patriotic solider and true son of the soil.  Despite his tremendous captainship for our liberation and misgivings thereafter, he followed the chain of command under civilian rule of Bangobondhu.  As the head of state post-1975 tragic events, he proved himself to be a visionary working through wee hours, traveling around the world securing diplomatic recognition and economic assistance for the war ravaged country, establishing a multi-party democratic system in the country, uplifting the confidence of countrymen, re-establishing discipline in academic environment (remember open book exam halls with weapon to threaten the invigilators and almost 100% passing rate!), and the list goes on....  Even at the poking of cronies and 'toshamodies,' Zia did not demean Bangobondhu and insisted that the history will appropriately recognize his great contributions; not a single street or monument bearing Bangobondhu Sk. Mujib's name was changed during Zia's administration.  I heard first hand accounts from the pre-independence Bangladeshi military officers in Paki army on how Zia guided them in choosing their career in East Bengal Regiment and mentored them. 

     I met this visionary man for the last time in early 1981 during one of his several shuttle diplomacy visits in the Middle East, but cannot forget his expressed zeal for achieving a confident and prosperous Bangladesh !  My thoughts and prayers for all of our leaders –Sk. Mujibur Rahman, Ziaur Rahman, Tajuddin Ahmed, Monsur Ali, Syed Nazrul Islam, Moulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhasani, Fazlul Haque, Gen. MAG Osmani, Capt. Gani—and all people who loved and worked for pre- and post-independent Bangladesh.  I would like to recommend that Bangladesh should adopt a National Leaders Day to recognize all its leaders—in the U.S. , Presidents Day holiday is celebrated to recognize all presidents of the country.    

     Regards.   

                   Sultan Chowdhury

                   Mayrland, USA


--- On Tue, 5/26/09, bd_mailer@yahoo. com <bd_mailer@yahoo. com> wrote:

From: bd_mailer@yahoo. com <bd_mailer@yahoo. com>
Subject: [khabor.com] Zia That I Knew: A Flashback
To: "Dhaka Mails" <dhakamails@yahoogro ups.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 11:13 AM

Zia That I Knew: A Flashback

Abu Obaid Chowdhury New York, USA
 

 

Following my defection from Pakistan Army in 1971 and after being cleared by the Indian and Mujibnagar authorities, I was posted to 'Z Force' of Lt Col Ziaur Rahman in the eastern theater of Bangladesh liberation war. The nearly 20-day journey took me from Lahore to Khemkaran to Ferozepur to Delhi to Kolkata to Agartala and finally to Masimpur, the 4 sector headquarters of Lt Col C R Dutta (later Major General).
 
As I reached my temporary accommodation, I heard a familiar voice next room. He was talking to Col Dutta. I went to check and found a gentleman in uniform, somewhat tired, half lying on the bamboo made platform, used as bed. It was dark and I could not see the face clearly. I wished him and introduced myself. He sat down and said, "So you are the Captain who came to raise my artillery unit. Sit down."
 
I still could not make out who the person was, though looked familiar. 2/Lt Sajjad Ali Zahir (later Lt Col), another defectee from West Pakistan and posted to my unit, joined me at Agartala. He followed me to the room. As I introduced Sajjad to the man, almost instantly the name flashed across my mind.
 
"He is Col Ziaur Rahman", I said to Sajjad. Earlier, then Major Ziaur Rahman was an instructor in the military academy when I was a cadet and his solid, deep voice was well known to me.On his query, I had to tell Col Zia my defection story—how I crossed the Lahore-Khemkaran border in a military jeep, how I survived after falling with the jeep in the Kasur River, who I reported to at India's Rajoke cantonment etc. He seemed to know the route and area pretty well. Somewhat surprised, I asked how he knew the names of those villages, tracks, BRB canal, barriers etc. "I was fighting the Indians there in 1965 with 1 E Bengal Regiment", Zia said.
 
After dinner, Zia left for his headquarters at Kailashahar. Before leaving he told me to take stock of my unit at Kukital and report to him in a day or two to find out what I needed to make the unit battle worthy within the shortest possible time. Capt Oli Ahmed (later Col and BNP Minister) and my Sialkot time friend Capt M A Halim (later Maj Gen), Brigade Major and Quartermaster respectively at Z Force, were very helpful in providing me with the material support I needed.
 
Whole Bangladesh is Firing Range
About two weeks later, Col M A G Osmani (later General and Minister), C-in-C of the Mukti Bahini, was visiting the area. Zia brought him to my camp with a view to showing the readiness of my guns for operation. I arranged a mock gun firing drill for the visiting team. Lt (later Capt and late) Sheikh Kamal, ADC to the C-in-C, told me afterwards, "Sir, the C-in-C was very impressed with the exercise. I heard him saying so to Col Zia." Of course, Osmani himself appreciated the preparedness and congratulated those who participated in the drill. At the luncheon at my camp, I asked him if I could conduct a practice firing before going to the real one, for which I needed a firing range.
"The whole Bangladesh is your firing range, my boy", said Osmani, "go ahead." He gave me a blank check.
 
After a day or two, while returning from forward positions, I noticed a large convoy of vehicles carrying soldiers passing by. Initially I thought they were Indians, but with a closer look I recognized they were our Mukti Bahini soldiers. In those days, we had the same OG (olive green) uniform worn by the Indian army in that area. After a while, I found Col Zia coming in a jeep. He stopped when he saw me. I asked him what was all that.
 
"That's my 1st Bengal", Zia brimmed with pride."Where are they going?" I asked.He got off his jeep and asked me to follow him. We went up on a high ground from where we could oversee the convoy passing."They are going to Atgram, to take up positions in preparation for the attack on the Pakistanis", Zia said as he was preparing to sit down. He briefly explained the plan for a 3-prong attack in north eastern Sylhet with his 1st, 3rd and 8th Bengal regiments.

"Am I not part of your brigade?" I asked, suppressing my disappointment.
"Of course you are", Zia asserted.
"Then why am I left out of this?" I demanded.
"Are you ready?" he asked me.
"Anytime", I replied.
I cannot describe in words the expression of happiness and pride that I noticed in Zia's face at that moment.
 
"Fine", he said, "you are going in support of 8th Bengal, possibly tonight. On my way, I will talk to Brigadier (I don't remember the name who was Zia's Indian support counterpart) to issue the ammunition and gun towers (trucks) to you on a priority basis. See me at headquarters later tonight. I will give you further details."
My excitement knew no bounds and was about to run away to arranged the details for the D-day I was waiting for.
 
Fight the War Our Way
"Wait, sit down", Col Zia stopped me, "there is time. Give me company while I see my unit clear away." As the convoy moved on, our discussion shifted to different directions. I told him how Pakistanis in the west had been conducting misleading propaganda about our war, our heroes and our future. In Pakistan, Zia and many others were already dead. I discovered a different Zia from the reclusive and serious one that most people knew. It looked like he wanted to open his mind.
 
We talked about the war, the strategy, its conduct and the policy makers in Mujibnagar. He expressed his frustration at the style and pace the war was going. He didn't like too much dependence on India for the conduct of our war.
 
"It is our war, we should fight it our way, not on someone else's convenience", he said. He did not hide his dislike for Col Osmani, the Mukti Bahini chief. "That man with white moustache", Zia said referring to Osmani, "has no idea about the situation in the war fronts and the enemy. Just passing orders off the map at someone else's dictation. I don't like it".
 
I was a bit embarrassed that he would open up like that with a subordinate and junior officer. But I also knew Zia, for whatever reasons, developed a liking for me and could confide. Our association continued till I met the president last in September 1980.
 
The sun was setting when we got up to leave. I told Col Zia that I could be late to reach his headquarters tonight because I had a number of errands to complete before I moved out. "Don't worry", Zia assured me, "I don't go to bed early". I later learnt that Zia usually worked till early hours of the morning in those days. He slept very little.
 
I came to Zia's headquarters around 11 pm and found him working in his tent, dimly lighted by a lantern. Our meeting was brief. He showed me the deployment of 8 Bengal Regiment off the map and I was to place guns suitably to support its attacks and advances. He called his BM Capt Oli and DQ Capt Halim to provide me whatever I needed.
 
My unit's first operation in Baralekha, Sylhet was a huge success. Next morning, an overjoyed Col Zia, accompanied by Capt Oli, visited my gun position. Greeting with a warm handshake, he told me, "You made history in our liberation war". He went round and shook hands and congratulated every man I had. Before Col Zia left, I told him that I would be going to the forward locations of 8 Bengal as FOO (Forward Observation Officer) soon.
"Make sure the gun position is well taken care of. These guns are very precious for us", Zia advised.

"It is in good hand, sir", I assured him.
Sometime in 1973, then army deputy chief Maj Gen Ziaur Rahman was on a visit to Chittagong where I was a staff officer to Col (later Lt Gen and BNP Minister) Mir Shawkat Ali, the local commander. At a luncheon for Zia at the commander's Flag Staff House where Brigadier Khalilur Rahman (later Maj Gen, Defense Adviser to Khandakar Mushtaque and AL MP), just repatriated from Pakistan, was also present. Zia and Khalil were discussing our liberation war. At one stage, Zia called me to tell the brigadier how I raised my artillery unit and how long it took me to train and make it ready for the war.
"The whole thing took me less than 3 weeks", I said.

A skeptical brigadier asked, "If you are given the men and material, would you be able to accomplish the same now?"
"Definitely, sir; however, it may take a little longer time," I replied.
"Please bear in mind, sir", I added, "it was wartime, that too a liberation war. Our only mission was to fight and win. We used every minute of our time, day and night, to get ready. I had some excellent trained artillery men from former Pakistan army. They formed the core, the rest were ordinary soldiers, students and others.
 
You got to see their spirit to believe it, sir. The beauty was, the unit that went to operation on a Ramadan afternoon without prior practice firing, had its very first shell falling right on the target, a Pakistani concentration in Baralekha, Sylhet, readying for an attack on 8 Bengal positions. That unexpected (Pakistanis never knew before that Mukti Bahini had artillery power) and devastating artillery shelling forced the disarrayed enemy to start a process of retreat leading to a complete defeat in that area."
I could see a proud Gen Zia enjoying our conversation standing nearby. He perhaps desired to highlight my contributions in our liberation war to the one who missed that chance.
 
The Revolt in Chittagong
Once at Kailashahar, Capt Oli told me the story how 8 E Bengal revolted at Halishahar in Chittagong on the night of March 25, 1971. The facts were later corroborated by Major Shamsher M Chowdhury, a batch mate (later Foreign Secretary and Ambassador to the US), Brigadier Chowdhury Khaluquzzaman (later Ambassador), and Capt Mahfuzur Rahman (later Lt Col and hanged following the assassination of Zia). They were all serving in 8 Bengal at that time.
 
Lt Col M R Chowdhury of East Bengal Recruits' Center (EBRC), Major Ziaur Rahman, Second-in-Command of 8 Bengal, Capt Rafiqul Islam (later Major and AL Minister) of East Pakistan Rifles and a few other officers had a number of secret coordinating meetings in Chittagong to cope with the situation if Pakistanis attacked the Bengalis. They sent messages to Sheikh Mujibur Rahman to inform that Pakistanis were preparing to disarm and attack the Bengali elements of the military and sought his advice and direction. They did not receive any. (Please see "A Tale of Millions" by Major Rafiqul Islam.)
On the night of March 25, 1971, operation Search Light, designed to annihilate the Bengalis by Pakistan Army, started in the cantonments, including Chittagong. Shamsher confirmed that elements of 20 Baluch and 31 Punjab regiments were advancing towards Halishahar. 8 Bengal then decided to revolt and resist the Pakistanis.
 
They arrested the Pakistani officers, including the Commanding Officer Lt Col Rashid Janjua (these officers were later killed) and wanted Ziaur Rahman to take command. At that moment, Zia was being taken, under naval escorts, to the Chittagong port, ostensibly to help unload the Chinese armaments from HMV Swat. According to other versions, Zia was actually on his way to his final journey! Khaliquzzaman rushed to get Zia and luckily found him waiting by the roadside while his escorts were clearing a barricade at Agrabad area. Khaliquzzaman whispered to Zia of the decision of 8 Bengal and then went to the navy Lt to say that Col Ansari, the new Punjabi Commandant at the EBRC, wanted Zia at Chittagong cantonment immediately. The Punjabi Lt did not suspect any foul play.
 
Zia and Khaliquzzaman rushed to the unit and found a truncated unit ready for action. Half of the men deserted out of fear and confusion. Major Shawkat recently arrived from Quetta after completing staff college course and was temporarily appointed Adjutant of 8 Bengal. As he was new in the unit, other officers could not take him into confidence at first. Some young officers were not sure if Shawkat was a Bengali at all. Shawkat was at his quarter and knew nothing about all that was going in the unit at that moment. Upon arrival, Zia went to Shawkat and asked if he would join the revolt. Shawkat thought for a while and then decided to join the group.
 
Though 8 Bengal readied itself to meet the attacking Pakistanis, they were outnumbered. Zia decided to fall back to Kalurghat and reorganize. They fought pitch battles and suffered heavy casualties in the process. Capt Harun Ahmed Chowdhury (later Maj Gen and Ambassador), Shamsher and others were mortally wounded and captured by the Pakistanis.
 
Here on March 27, 1971, Zia made his famous declaration of independence at the Kalurghat Radio Station. According to Oli, he was instrumental in the making of the declaration. He even claimed to have made Zia. Shamsher told me that he drafted the final version of the declaration. So much for the controversy over the declaration of independence made by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman on the night of March 25, 1971.
 
Audacity to Distort Zia's Role
Lately, a few AL ministers and parliamentarians started disputing Zia's participation in the war of liberation. Former minister Prof Abu Syed and one Dr. Mina Farah of New York, who chose to incinerate her Muslim son instead of burial, had the audacity to claim in recent talk shows that Zia was not a freedom fighter at all. I can only say that these persons need to get their brain checked.
 
Special Mission
In September 1980, I was sent to Dhaka on a special mission concerning military cooperation in one of the middle-eastern countries. My meetings with Minister Prof Shamsul Huq and Foreign Secretary SHMS Kibria were not positive. Army chief General H M Ershad and chief of the general staff Maj Gen Abdul Manaf were hesitant. I wanted to talk to the president. While I was waiting in the office of the Military Secretary to the President Col Sadequr Rahman Chowdhury in Bangabhaban, President Zia suddenly burst in and asked me, without any prelude, "What kind of proposal is it? How can we agree to this? We have no capability to undertake such a task. Besides, we can't afford to enter into a kind of rivalry with a superpower."
 
I understood the president came straight from the meeting deliberating on the same issue. While coming to the Bangabhaban, I saw Ershad there.
"Sir, give me a few minutes", I requested the president, "and I will explain the stake involved, how it can be made possible and what we stand to gain. There is no superpower rivalry, and I believe you were not given the correct picture by our foreign office." The president tried to defend the foreign office though.
 
We sat down and I stated what I thought right. I also said something to the president in confidence which only I could dare say. I pointed out that peripheral and invisible resources (I even listed those resources) of our military would be more than enough to make an initial commitment. In return, we can seek financial assistance and resources to raise more units, modernize, equip and train our forces. It would be an ongoing process.
That did the job! I could see a glow in the face of the president.
"Please do not say 'NO', sir," I begged the president, further adding, "for the first time, a rich friend requested Bangladesh for something".
 
"Wait a moment", he told me and turned to the MSP, "Sadeq, get hold of Ershad, he was leaving. I need to talk to him again". The president went out of the room and I was hoping for the best. After half an hour, the president came back and told me, "Ok, you tell them, we accept the proposal in principle. But, we need to discuss further. We may have to send a team of experts to examine the details".

"Thank you, sir. But, it needs to be conveyed by our foreign office", I humbly submitted."I will talk to the foreign minister," the president said.
A little relaxed, I now had time to exchange usual pleasantries with the president. At one stage, he picked up a newspaper, I thought it was Holiday, from the desk of the MSP and proudly showed me a news item that said Bangladesh would export certain type of quality rice.

"How can we do that?" It was my time to be surprised now.
"We will do it, you will see", asserted a confident president.
I later learnt that the Foreign Office maintained its original position. I felt a huge overseas opportunity for our defense forces was sabotaged. (I am unable to detail the opportunity here).
 
That was the last time I saw Shaheed President Ziaur Rahman.
After his death, I went to Bangladesh on vacation. My wife and I visited a bereaved Begum Zia at her residence. Brigadier Mahtab (late), an old friend, was with me. Begum Zia talked very little, but acknowledged receipt of my condolence letter. In course of our discussion, she asked me, "What do you think should happen now and how the things should be run?" I could not figure out what she meant. Mahtab clarified that who I should think to take the leadership and carry forward ideals of Zia at that juncture.
 
I was not prepared for such a question and had no idea what Begum Zia was trying to lead me to, least of all her political ambition. I just fumbled that if anybody could come close to the stature of Ziaur Rahman, I thought it would be General M A Manzur. Unfortunately, he was the man behind the assassination of the president. (At that time, we were made to believe it was Manzur who masterminded the bloody coup in Chittagong. Later, however, I had different view about Manzur's complicity.) I expressed my inability to name a successor to Zia.
 
Years later, I said to myself in retrospect, "Stupid, the right answer should have been: you Madam." In a letter to General Ershad commending his efforts in quelling the Chittagong rebellion, I said, 'given the peoples' love and respect Shaheed President Zia received (reportedly 2 million people gathered around Dhaka airport when his coffin was brought in from Chittagong and attended his final Janaza), a Zia-like death is worth million times'. I also submitted that he had huge responsibilities for the stability in the military, as well as the nation. Ershad was kind enough to reply saying he was 'working' on some ideas and would seek our support. I later learnt what he was 'working' on.
 
We Have Been Orphaned
I went to the Bangabhaban again, this time to see Justice Abdus Sattar, the acting president. As I was waiting at the office of Col S R Chowdhury, the MSP related an experience. While on a visit to Zia's mazaar at one night, he found an old man crying by the grave. Sadeq went to share the feelings and console the man. He came all the way from Rangpur to pay his respect to the shaheed president. "'Badsha' Zia had walked through my front yard", the old man continued to cry, "how can I forget that? We have been orphaned."
 
During a courtesy call on Maj Gen Mohabbat Jan Chowdhury (later Minister of Ershad), Director General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI), I asked how come his intelligence failed when such a tragedy took place in Chittagong? Gen Chowdhury said that they knew something was in the offing in Chittagong and warned the president accordingly, but the president did not take it seriously. They also reminded the president on more than one occasion that Gen Manzur was going out of control, often refused to follow orders and instructions from army headquarters and mostly did things his way. According to M J Chowdhury, the president never believed them; he would rather rebuke them (repatriated and non-freedom fighter officers) instead, saying that they were jealous of Manzur who was far more superior in intellect and competence.
 
A footnote: The President's rehabilitation of the repatriated officers in high positions in the military enraged the young freedom fighter officers. The coup that killed the president was staged by freedom fighter officers. During a discussion with Gen Manzur in his office in Chittagong in 1979, I discovered how bitter he was against the non-freedom fighters. At the same time, I knew Zia and Manzur enjoyed great cordiality, mutual confidence and close relation. After the November 7, 1975 Sepoy-Janata Uprising, situation in the military was almost out of control and its discipline was at its lowest. Zia brought in Brig Manzur from New Delhi, where he was the military adviser, and appointed him the chief of the general staff. It was Manzur who brought back order in the military.
 
Incorruptible Zia
President Ziaur Rahman's austere and honest lifestyle was legendary. Even his worst enemy can not dispute that. Critics, however, blamed him for doing little against corrupt practices of some of his ministers and political leaders.
In late 1972, I called on then Brigadier Zia at his residence to introduce my newly married wife. Other than being overwhelmed with the extraordinary beauty of Begum Zia, my wife noticed that Zia was wearing an ordinary leather sandal having repairs done.
 
It was a common knowledge what was found in Zia's broken suitcase at the Chittagong Circuit House following his assassination on May 30, 1981—a few change of clothes that included a torn vest.Here is a story I heard from Hussain Ahmed, a former IGP and Secretary. An SP came to his residence at a late hour of night with a request to cancel his posting to a distant place. A much annoyed IGP dismissed the request. Before leaving, the disappointed SP pointed to his accompanying gentleman who remained absolutely silent the whole time, "Sir, do you know him?" The IGP replied in negative.
 
"He is Mizanur Rahman, brother of the President", said the SP. Naturally, the IGP became a little soft and more accommodating now and asked the SP to see him in the office. He, however, did not recall if that request was ever met.
 
Later, the IGP casually related the story to Air Vice Marshal Islam, then DGFI. A day or two later, IGP's red phone rang at around 3 am. Somewhat disturbed to be awakened at that odd hour, he picked up the phone and received a thunder.
 
"I heard that b—— went to you for a favor?" It was the president and it took time for the IGP to understand what he was referring to. The IGP tried to pacify the president saying that his brother just accompanied the SP and did not utter a word at all. "I would like to have a full report tomorrow", the president insisted and dropped the phone.
 
Reportedly, president Ziaur Rahman sent out circulars to all departments that personal requests by his family members should be directed to him immediately.
 
Everybody knew the fact that Zia refused to intervene when his son Tarique was thrown out of Shaheen School. During an official visit to Zambia, High Commissioner A N Hamidullah was briefing the president on the program, repeatedly mentioning of an appointment with president's brother Rezaur Rahman who was working there as an engineer. The president did not like it. He rebuked the High Commissioner for putting his brother's appointment in the official program. "I know my brother is here. I will meet him at my own convenience, and it is my personal matter", the president reminded the High Commissioner.
 
Another story from Hussain Ahmed. The almost daily Bangabhaban evening meetings used to run for long hours and working dinners were served from the house. The menu was more than simple–rice or roti with one curry and dal. Minister Moudud Ahmed found difficulty to take that any more. At dinner time, he requested the president if he could be excused as he had promised his children to eat together. The president smiled and let him go.
 
One may recall that Ziaur Rahman introduced Toyota Corolla as the official car at all levels, including for himself. A few Mercedes that Bangabhaban had were used only for foreign dignitaries during official visits.
 
Alas, the Zia family seemed to have failed to keep the clean image that Zia had in his lifetime!









See all the ways you can stay connected to friends and family

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] National anthem at schools (madrassahs)



  Why is the National Anthem not sung in the thousands of new madrassahs in Bangladesh? 
 
If you think that the modern madrassahs are formulated around principles that are diametrically opposed to celebrating the beauty of our motherland, you would be right. But if you think that these new-fangled  madrassahs are the same as they were 200 years ago, and are run along the customs and beliefs of Banglar Islam, then you'd be wrong.  Grossly mistaken.
 
    Pease read my article. You will not find another article that talks about madrassahs in Bangladesh with such a wealth of information.
              
 
http://www.bangladesh-web.com/view.php?hidRecord=267816
 
         Farida Majid


To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: akbar_50@hotmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:52:00 +0000
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] National anthem at schools



While working in Rawalpindi in 1970 I was asked by a Pakistani gentleman about my identity whether I am a Muslim or Bengali first. I proudly identified myself as a Bengali then a Muslim. Naturally he was not happy and confirmed his conviction that breaking up of Pakistan was just a matter of time. This incident came back to me again in relation to the current debate on singing of the national anthem in Bangladeshi madrassas. This is a serious gap in achieving the goal of a unified nation in Bangladesh. The reluctance of the Islamic clergy to accept traditional Bengali culture as a dominant force in shaping this young and sovereign nation is a contentious issue. The madrassa education which produces a clergy class carries a diametrically opposite ideology which works against creating a unified Bengali nation. The sharia taboo against music and songs in Islam is based on ignorance. A handful of Islamic fundamentalists like the Taliban's use brute force to enforce this taboo but the vast majority of the Muslims do not share their repulsive views. As religion is always a divisive force it always tries to block progress and universal understanding. In a society like Bangladesh where modern education is yet reach every citizen this situation will continue to plague the nation. But the patriotic forces must continue the struggle.

 

Akbar Hussain

Canada


 


To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: ezajur.rahman@q8.com
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:33:21 +0300
Subject: [ALOCHONA] National anthem at schools



National anthem at schools

http://www.newagebd.com/2009/jun/13/fb.html
The singing of the national anthem in madrassahs is long overdue. But the truth is no nation willingly separates its young citizens from such a young age driving them into different worlds which seldom coincide. It is our irresponsibility that has brought us to this situation. State managed seminaries, with broad consultation, can develop the religious men who will lead our congregations in prayer. But the vast majority of madrassah students should be sitting beside their fellow citizens in the classrooms of regular government schools. Many will argue about this but I have never met a successful man who studied at a madrassah and then sent his own son to a madrassah. We are tearing the soul of our country apart and we have been doing so for a long time.
   Ezajur Rahman
   Kuwait

 





Windows Live helps you keep up with all your friends, in one place.



Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how.

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] My views of life.



An unknown friend of mine has underscored the importance of humanity than nationality in response to my post where I described an incident in Rawalpindi in 1970 regarding my identity. The reference was an emotional necessity at that time which nobody can deny. One thing I would make clear that I do not give preference to any religion in my life. But if I am pressed to make a declaration in this regard I would say that my identity or identity of any person is based on his/her ethnicity. This narrow description widens when we know someone closely by his/her views on life, philosophical basis of thinking and overall generosity towards the diversities of life. These are independent qualifications based on the degree of freedom by a soul not influenced by narrow jurisdictions of religion which always lead us to a quagmire of conflicts. This is not the first time that I am lectured by people who are too afraid to free themselves from the shackles of religious fear to venture into the wide open horizon of life. Fear is a cult and freedom is emancipation or nirvana.

 

Akbar Hussain

 

 

       

Attention all humans. We are your photos. Free us.

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] AL cabinet, prothom alo and daily star?



যারা টিপাইমুখ বাঁধের পক্ষে তারা দেশের বন্ধু নন : মোজাফ্ফর
 

AL  cabinet, prothom alo and daily star?
 
Are they raising voice enough against tipaimukhi dam?

Is there any army in the world that can win over 150 Millions people? Should we be afraid of any country?          
                               
                              



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Another BDR man dies of 'heart failure'



Another BDR man dies of 'heart failure'

Another jawan of Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) of 46 rifles battalion died of heart failure at Rajshahi Medical College Hospital (RMCH) yesterday.

The deceased, Nayek Subedar Munshi Belal Hossain, 53, hailed from Khulna Sadar, was recruited in BDR in 1976.

With his demise, the number of unnatural death of BDR jawans rose to 27 since the February 25-26 mutiny at BDR headquarters in the capital.

A BDR press release said Belal went to Sapahar Thana Health Complex on May 30 from Radhanagar border outpost with fever. After treatment he was sent back to his duty station.

Belal was taken to the battalion headquarters at Naogaon on instructions of the authorities on June 2 as he continued to suffer from fever and was under treatment of the sector medical officer till June 9.

The next day he was admitted to Naogaon Sadar Hospital and was released on June 13 after treatment. As he fell sick again on June 14, he was first admitted to Naogaon Sadar Hospital and then taken to the RMCH where he died four and a half hours later after his admission at 1:30pm, the release said.

His death certificate cited 'irreversible cardio-respiratory failure with heomoepysis and ARDS' as the cause of his death, it said.

The body will be sent to his home by BDR, it added.

 




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Tipaimukh Dam : Some Technical Aspects



Tipaimukh Dam : Some Technical Aspects

By M Azizur Rehman


A kg of water on sea level/ surface is converted into vapor/cloud by absorbing certain amount of heat energy from the sun, then raises on to mountain gaining further height/energy, higher the height higher the energy. That means a kg on 10,000 Meter height has 1X10000 meter-kg energy or 10000 meter-kg energy.

What is energy? It has potential to work

What is work? ( Work can Physically make and break or change the state of matter). The product of Force and Distance ( in Kg-Meter or Foot -Pound unit ) is Work or Energy. If you lift 5lb to 20 feet level/height, you have done 5x20 or 100 ft-lb of work. the object now has 100 ft-lb energy. If allowed to fall it will smash( make/break matter) with 100 ft-lb of work.

If 1 Kg ( is force - gravitational i.e., the pull between the earth and the kg mass/object). 1 kg water at hight of 10,000 meter is being pulled by earth center at a pulling force of 1kg wight. When the water is at rest, we say it has potential energy of 10,000 kg-meter.

Now allow the water to fall through 10,000 meter, say to see level, free fall like rain/waterfall and sliding through mountain slop is different. Sliding will be opposed by frictional/ resisting force created by rocks, ice, trees, soil etc . Distance covered x 1 kg will be work done. What is this work? the movement of rocks and soil down ward is the work. Water velocity (rate of movement) will slow down as load being carried. On mountain slop the velocity is higher , the of load of boulders and pebbles are also bigger. and velocity slows down. At any point of journey total energy can be seen in two parts . height gives potential energy at rest position, velocity gives dynamic/moving (Kinetic) energy.

At Tipai, say at 1000 meter height ,the moment you stop water, the previous velocity (Somewhat reduced due to work done at upper height) created by upper height (9,000) meter will come to zero. You have to break the velocity by dam that will resist the water velocity and its level will rise at dam reservoir. Now you put the water through turbine pipe with generator (to produce electricity) water will fall through reservoir level height to generator height, gaining some velocity. To create electricity (which is energy, that can work), water has to overcome turbine resistance and again loose velocity (moving energy). After the turbine, again the water will gain velocity (much lesser) to carry load.

Pinak says they will not hold water back but release all after getting getting electricity. (that will transfer maximum part of energy of water). Then what is the difference????

Say the water is running down from 10,000 meter and Tipai is at say 1,000 meter. If the dam is not there Sylhet rivers will get water with 9,000 meter height (residual) energy which may have grater velocity or dynamic energy to drive the Sylhet rivers to the sea as doing now.

It the dam was there, then Sylhet rivers will be driven by 1,000 meter height level energy i.e, water will have, say only one tenth of the original energy to drive to the sea. Rivers will be silted and flatten the basin with increasing floods (in the Padma no flooding as such as water is withheld/diverted at Farakkha) creating many channels and changes in the basin. Pinak says they will release entire water. But at what energy or velocity level ????] Water at Tipai reservoir at 1,000 meter height and water on mountain 10,000 meter height level are not the same. Sylhet rivers are already aging/dying /flattening without the dam. So the difference is big.]

----------------------------------------
M Azizur Rehman
E Mail :
rehman.mohammad@gmail.com



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] DFP tender and Chatra League



DFP tender and Chatra League
 
 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Loot: in search of the East India Company



Loot: in search of the East India Company

Concerns about corporate power and responsibility are as old as the corporation itself. In this account of the East India Company, the world's first transnational corporation, Nick Robins argues that an unholy alliance between British government, military and commerce held India in slavery, reversed the flow of trade and cultural influence forever between the East and West and then sunk almost without trace under the weight of colonial guilt.

View of Lahore in the mid nineteenth century,
Mid nineteenth century view of Lahore, home to one of the Emperor's courts during the Mughal period. Panoramic scroll by an Indian artist. Or.11186
© British Library
 
 

Ours is a corporate age. Yet, amid the fertile arguments on how to tame and transform today's corporations, there is a curious absence, a sense that the current era of business dominance is somehow unique. For there was a time when corporations really ruled the world, and among the commercial dinosaurs that once straddled the globe, Britain's East India Company looms large. At its height, the Company ruled over a fifth of the world's people, generated a revenue greater than the whole of Britain and commanded a private army a quarter of a million strong.

 

 

Warren Hastings
 
'The most formidable commercial republic known to the world' Warren Hastings, 1780 (1732–1818). Painting by a Mughal artist c1782
Or 6633.f.67r © British Library
 
Although it started out as a speculative vehicle to import precious spices from the East Indies – modern-day Indonesia – the Company grew to fame and fortune by trading with and then conquering India. And for many Indians, it was the Company's plunder that first de-industrialised their country and then provided the finance that fuelled Britain's own industrial revolution. In essence, the Honourable East India Company found India rich and left it poor.
But visit London today, where the Company was headquartered for over 250 years, and nothing is there to mark its rise and fall, its power and its crimes. Like a snake, the City seems embarrassed of an earlier skin. All that remains is a pub – the East India Arms on Fenchurch Street. Cramped, but popular with office workers, the pub stands at the centre of the Company's former commercial universe.
 
The absence of any memorial to the East India Company is peculiar. For this was not just any corporation. Not only was it the first major shareholder owned company, but it was also a pivot that changed the course of economic history. During its lifetime, the Company first reversed the ancient flow of wealth from West to East, and then put in place new systems of exchange and exploitation. From Roman times, Europe had always been Asia's commercial supplicant, shipping out gold and silver in return for spices, textiles and luxury goods. And for the first 150 years after its establishment by Queen Elizabeth I in 1600, the Company had to repeat this practice; there was simply nothing that England could export that the East wanted to buy.
 
 
Clive's victory over the Nawab of Bengal at Plassey in 1757
© British Library
 
The situation changed dramatically in the middle of the 18th century, as the Company's officials took advantage of the decline of the Mughal Empire and began to acquire the hinterland beyond its vulnerable coastal trading posts. Territorial control enabled the Company both to manipulate the terms of trade in its favour and gouge taxes from the lands it ruled. Within a few years of Clive's freak victory over the Nawab of Bengal at Plassey in 1757, the Company had managed to halt the export of bullion eastwards, creating what has poetically been called the 'unrequited trade' – using the East's own resources to pay for exports back to Europe. The impacts of this huge siphoning of wealth were immense, creating a 'misery' of 'an essentially different and infinitely more intensive kind than all Hindustan had to suffer before', in the words of a columnist writing for the New York Tribune in 1853, one Karl Marx..
 
'An unbounded ocean of business'

Daniel Defoe (1660–1731)

Established as a means to capture control of the pepper trade from the Dutch, the East India Company prospered as an importer of luxury goods, first textiles and then tea. From the middle of the 17th century on, the growing influx of cottons radically improved hygiene and comfort, while tea transformed the customs and daily calendar of the people. And it was in the huge five-acre warehouse complex at Cutlers Gardens that these goods were stored prior to auction at East India House. Here, over 4,000 workers sorted and guarded the Company's stocks of wondrous Indian textiles: calicoes, muslins and dungarees, ginghams, chintzes and seersuckers, taffetas, alliballlies and hum hums. Today, the Company's past at Cutlers Gardens is marked with ceramic tiles that bear a ring of words: 'silks, skins, tea, ivory, carpets, spices, feathers, cottons', but still no mention of the company itself.

 

 

A pile-carpet loom at Hunsur, Mysore 1850
Add Or 755
© British Library
 
This lifestyle revolution was not without opposition. For hundreds of years, India had been renowned as the workshop of the world, combining great skill with phenomenally low labour costs in textile production. As the Company's imports grew, so local manufacturers in England panicked. In 1699, things came to a head and London's silk weavers rioted, storming East India House in protest at cheap imports from India. The following year, Parliament prohibited the import of all dyed and printed cloth from the East, an act to be followed 20 years later by a complete ban on the use or wearing of all printed calicoes in England – the first of many efforts to protect the European cloth industry from Asian competition. And it was behind these protectionist barriers that England's mechanised textile industry was to grow and eventually crush India's handloom industry.
 
'What is England now? A sink of Indian wealth, filled by nabobs'
Horace Walpole, 1773 (1717–1797)
 
 
East India House
East India House, Leadenhall Street c. 1800
 
Standing on Leadenhall Street facing the site of East India House, it is difficult to appreciate the raw energy, envy and horror that the Company generated in 18th-century England. Today, Richard Rogers' sleek Lloyds insurance building stands on the site, but on auction days in the 18th century, the noise of 'howling and yelling' from the Sale Room could be heard through the stone walls on the street outside.
 

For 30 years after Robert Clive's victory at Plassey, East India House lay at the heart of both the economy and governance of Britain, a monstrous combination of trader, banker, conqueror and power broker. It was from here that the 24 Directors guided the Company's commercial and increasingly political affairs, always with an eye to the share price; when Clive captured the French outpost of Chandernagore in Bengal in 1757, stocks rose by 12%. The share price moved higher still in the 1760s as investors fed hungrily on news of the apparently endless source of wealth that Bengal would provide. The Company was rapidly extending its reach from trade to the governance of whole provinces, using the taxes raised to pay for the imports of cloth and tea back to England.

 

In the wake of Enron and other scandals of the dot.com 1990s, the malpractice of many of the Company's key executives is sadly familiar: embedded corruption, insider trading and appalling corporate governance. In the process, a new class of 'nabobs' was created (a corruption of the Hindi word nawab). Clive obtained almost a quarter of a million pounds in the wake of Plassey, and told a House of Commons enquiry into suspected corruption that he was 'astounded' at his own moderation at not taking more. Thomas Pitt, Governor of Madras earlier in the century, used his fortune to sustain the political careers of his grandson and great-grandson, both of whom became Prime Minister. By the 1780s, about a tenth of the seats in Parliament were held by 'nabobs'. They inspired deep bitterness among aristocrats angry at the way they bought their way into high society. A few lone voices – such as the Quaker William Tuke – also pointed to the humanitarian disaster that the Company had wrought in India.

 

All these forces converged to create a new movement to regulate the Company's affairs. But so powerful was the Company's grip on British politics that attempts to control its affairs could bring down governments. In the early 1780s, a Whig alliance of Charles James Fox and Edmund Burke sought to place the Company's Indian possessions under Parliamentary rule. But their efforts were crushed by an unholy pact of Crown and Company. George III first dismissed the government and then forced a general election, which the Company funded to the hilt, securing a compliant Parliament.

 

 

 
'A transfer of East India Stock', political caricature by James Sayer 1783. Charles James Fox carries off East India House into a stronghold of the Crown.P1792 © British Library
 
Yet the case for reform was overwhelming, and the new Prime Minister, William Pitt the Younger – that beneficiary of his great-grandfather's time in Madras – pushed through the landmark India Act of 1784. This transferred executive management of the Company's Indian affairs to a Board of Control, answerable to Parliament. In the final 70 years of its life, the Company would become less and less an independent commercial venture and more a sub-contracted administrator for the British state, a Georgian example of a 'public–private partnership'.
 
'Every rupee of profit made by an Englishman is lost forever to India'
Edmund Burke, 1783 (1729–1797)
For centuries, the City of London has ruled itself from the fine mediaeval Guildhall. It was here in 1794 that the Mayor of London made the Governor-General of Bengal, Lord Cornwallis, an Honorary Freeman of the City, awarding him a gold medal in a gilded box. Cornwallis had certainly earned this prize from Britain's merchant class. He had defeated Tipu Sultan of Mysore, extracting an eight-figure indemnity, and had just pushed through the 'permanent settlement' in Bengal, securing healthy tax revenues for the Company's shareholders. Seeking to increase the efficiency of tax collection in the Company's lands, Cornwallis cut through the complex patterns of mutual obligation that existed in the countryside and introduced an essentially English system of land tenure. At the stroke of a pen, the zamindars, a class of tax-farmers under the Mughals, were transformed into landlords. Bengal's 20 million smallholders were deprived of all hereditary rights. Two hundred years on, and after decades of land reform, the effects still live on in Bengal.

This 'permanent settlement' was simply a more systematic form of what had gone before. Just five years after the Company secured control over Bengal in 1765, revenues from the land tax had already tripled, beggaring the people. These conditions helped to turn one of Bengal's periodic droughts in 1769 into a full-blown famine.

 

Today, the scale of the disaster inflicted on the people of Bengal is difficult to comprehend. An estimated 10 million people – or one-third of the population – died, transforming India's granary into a 'jungle inhabited only by wild beasts'. But rather than organise relief efforts to meet the needs of the starving, the Company actually increased tax collection during the famine [similar policies were applied again more than a hundred years later by the government of British India - see Present Hunger, Past Ghosts] . Many of its officials and traders privately exploited the situation; grain was seized by force from peasants and sold at inflated prices in the cities.

 

Even in good times the Company's exactions proved ruinous. The Company became feared for its brutal enforcement of its monopoly interests, particularly in the textile trade. Savage reprisals would be exacted against any weavers found selling cloth to other traders, and the Company was infamous for cutting off their thumbs to prevent them ever working again. In rural areas, almost two-thirds of a peasant's income would be devoured by land tax under the Company – compared with some 40% under the Mughals. In addition, punitive rates of tax were levied on essentials such as salt, cutting consumption in Bengal by half. The health impacts were cruel, increasing vulnerability to heat exhaustion and lowered resistance to cholera and other diseases, particularly amongst the poorest sections.

 

The Company's monopoly control over the production of opium had equally devastating consequences. Grown under Company eyes in Bengal, the opium was auctioned and then privately smuggled into China in increasing volumes. By 1828, opium sales in China were enough to pay for the entire purchase of tea, but at the cost of mass addiction, ruining millions of lives. When the Chinese tried to enforce its import ban, the British sent in the gunboats.

 

'The misery hardly finds parallel in the history of commerce'

William Bentinck, 1834

By this time, the Company's dual role as trader and governor was viewed as increasingly anachronistic – not least by the rising free trade lobby that despised its dominance. Eager to sell its cloth, in 1813, Britain's textile manufacturers forced the ending of the Company's monopoly of trade with India. The Company's commercial days were coming to a close. The final blow came in 1834 with the removal of all trading rights; its docks and warehouses (including those at Cutler Street) were sold off.

 

Technology, free trade and utilitarian ethics now came together in a powerful package to uplift the degraded people of India. But while the Company promoted a mission to make Indians 'useful and happy subjects', the twin pillars of Company rule remained the same: military and commercial conquest. By the 1850s, the budget for 'social uplift' was meager – while £15,000 was indeed made available for Indian schools, £5 million went to the military war chest.

 

The telegraph, steam ship and railway were introduced to accelerate access of British goods to Indian markets. The rapid influx of mill-made cloth shattered the village economy based on an integration of agriculture and domestic spinning, and the great textile capitals of Bengal. Between 1814 and 1835, British cotton cloth exported to India rose 51 times, while imports from India fell to a quarter. During the same period, the population of Dacca shrunk from 150,000 to 20,000. Even the Governor-General, William Bentinck, was forced to report that 'the misery hardly finds parallel in the history of commerce. The bones of the cotton-weavers are bleaching the plains of India.'

 

'Exterminate the Race'

Charles Dickens, 1857 (1812–1870)

Walk to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office from St James' Park and you will go up 'Clive's steps', named after the statue of Robert Clive that stands without apology outside the old India Office buildings. It was here that the government transferred the administration of India in the wake of the disastrous 'mutiny' of 1857. Many explanations have been given for this uprising against Company rule in northern India, but the Company's increasing racial and administrative arrogance lay at the root.

 

 

The East offering its riches to Britannia, by Spiridione Roma Click here for a detailed tour around this painting
 
 
Anglo-Indians were excluded from senior positions in the Company; non-European wives of the Company were forbidden to follow their husbands back to Britain. Verbal abuse mounted, with 'nigger' becoming a common expression for Indians. This slide into separatism also affected the Company's relations with its Indian soldiers, the sepoys. One by one, ties between the army and local communities were cut: Hindu and Muslim holy men were barred from blessing the sepoy regimental colours, and troops were stopped from participating in festival parades. As missionary presence grew, fears mounted that the Company was planning forcible conversion to Christianity.

All these sleights and apprehensions came to a head when sepoys in northern India rejected a new type of rifle cartridge, said to be greased with cow and/or pig fat. What turned a mutiny into a rebellion, however, was the Company's crass behaviour towards local rulers in Oudh, Cawnpore and Jhansi, who all turned against the Company as the soldiers rose. Symbolically, the first act of the mutineers at Meerut was to march the 36 miles to Delhi to claim the puppet Emperor Bahadur Shah as their leader.

 

The war, known simply as the 'Indian Mutiny', lasted for almost two years, and was characterised by extreme savagery on both sides. When the Company retook Cawnpore, where rebel troops had slaughtered European women and children, captured sepoys were made to lick the blood from the floors before being hanged. The reconquest of Delhi by the Company's troops was followed by systematic sacking, and the surviving inhabitants were turned out of its gates to starve. Bahadur's two sons and grandson were killed in cold blood, and the old Mughal was stripped of his powers and sent into exile in Rangoon.

 

Yet the Company that had grown in a symbiotic relationship with the Mughal Empire could not long survive its passing. The uprising itself and the massacres of Europeans had generated a ferocious bloodlust in British society. Even the mild-mannered Charles Dickens declared that 'I wish I were commander-in-chief in India [for] I would do my utmost to exterminate the Race upon whom the stain of the late cruelties rested.' On 1 November 1858, a proclamation was read from every military cantonment in India: the East India Company was abolished and direct rule by Queen and Parliament was introduced. Firework displays followed the proclamation

The Company's legacy was quickly erased. East India House was demolished in 1861. India was no longer ruled from a City boardroom, but from the imperial elegance of Whitehall.

 

'Zakhm gardab gaya, lahu na thama'

('Though the wound is hidden, the blood does not cease to flow')

Asadullah Khan Ghalib (1797–1869)

Many would argue that the Company was no worse and in some respects somewhat better than other conquerors and rulers of India. What sets the Company apart, however, was the remorseless logic of its eternal search for profit, whether through trade, through taxation or through war. The Company was not just any other ruler. As a commercial venture, it could not and did not show pity during the Bengal famine of 1769–1770. Shareholder interests came first when it dispossessed Bengal's peasantry with its 'permanent settlement' of 1794. And the principles of laissez-faire ensured that its Governor-General would note the devastation of India's weavers in the face of British imports, and then do absolutely nothing.

 

Many institutions have justifiably disappeared into the anonymity of history. But in a country like Britain that is so drenched in the culture of heritage, the public invisibility of the East India Company is suspicious. Perhaps a single Hindi word can now help to explain this selective memory, this very British reticence: loot.


Nick Robins and the interdisciplinary group PLATFORM have created a critical walk through the London sites and monuments of the East India Company. For more information telephone PLATFORM 00 44 (0)20 7403 3738, or e-mail platform@gn.apc.org.
 

Some of the images reproduced in this article, together with many more, also appear in the British Library online exhibition Trading Places: The East India Company and Asia 1600-1834.

 

http://www.opendemocracy.net/theme_7-corporations/article_904.jsp




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___