Banner Advertiser

Monday, September 28, 2009

[ALOCHONA] Developed Bangladesh by the shortest possible time




Developed Bangladesh by the shortest possible time

To make Bangladesh a developed country by the shortest possible time, we need to bring some small changes that will bring big changes .

These are

1.We have to show the nation value of time. For this, we have only one way , that is , to declare hourly minimum wages/salary, 20, 25 or 30 TK, whatever reasonable from both employer and employee point of view.
 
 For rest visit the link
 
The test of patriotism is not a one-off event for anyone, let alone the political quarters, that once passed is passed for ever. It is rather a perpetual process, especially for the ruling political quarters that have to pass it every moment- Nurul Kabir , Editor , The NewAge



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] Tritiyo Matra Online



Dear all,

Greetings from Tritiyo Matra team.

Tritiyo Matra is now online to establish an opinion sharing platform for all. You shall now find a constant source of information about the activities of the contributors who are empowering Tritiyo Matra. The site shall offer valuable archive and database of all important episodes (video) of Tritiyo Matra and shall contain all the profiles of its celebrity guests including historical data and photographs. Also an aggregated RSS feed brings together news from all over the world at your fingertips. Get the latest and greatest right here!

The site offers numerous benefits to its members, where membership to our site is simple, absolutely free and for authentication purposes only. Once you log in (register to become a member) to the site you shall be able to receive a number of free benefits inlcuding having your own Profile Page including dynamic Pictorial, Blog and Article Gallery Space and lot more (Similar to facebook). You shall also be able to participate in the Community Discussion Forums with our guests including VIPs, Politicians, Bureaucrats, Intellectuals, Entrepreneurs, Economists, Businessmen, Journalists, Media Celebrities and US, i.e., its Hosts, Supporters, Friends, Partners and Patrons.

We welcome you to log on to Tritiyo Matra Online and become a part of us and our efforts to construct the future...

Learn and share about Tritiyo Matra Online with your friends & family worldwide. For any queries please feel free to e-mail the Webmaster This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  Thanks.

Cheers,

Zillur Rahman, Host & Director, Tritiyo Matra, Channel i



__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] FW: খনিজ সম্পদ [1 Attachment]

[Attachment(s) from Fayazuddin Ahmad included below]



http://fayaz.carbonmade.com/about/


--- On Sun, 9/27/09, firoz ahmed <subarnasava@gmail.com> wrote:

From: firoz ahmed <subarnasava@gmail.com>
Subject: খনিজ সম্পদ
To: "FAYAZuddin Ahmad" <mongolalok@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, September 27, 2009, 5:12 PM

খনিজ সম্পদ


Attachment(s) from Fayazuddin Ahmad

1 of 1 File(s)


__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Re- BDR Tragedy, True Findings



 

Do you ask these questions because my comments are inconvenient to you? When I was criticizing Barrister Munshi 2 years ago none of you questioned my identity. Now that I have revealed the truth that the pro-liberation forces have been perpetrating a fraud and have tried to cover up the truth contained in The India Doctrine my identity is suddenly to be doubted.

 

Why did no one come forward at that time to challenge the content of Barrister Munshi's work? Why was their utter silence on the issue which even after 3 years of publication still has not been broken? If the pro-liberation forces represent the truth why could they not have undertaken a successful challenge against The India Doctrine as I had proposed?

 

Finally why does not the new report on the DeshCalling blog on the BDR mutiny stir our conscience into action? Why again have we stuck our heads into the sand? Is it because we are afraid of the truth that we have been living a lie? Does not the death of 57 officers pain us immeasurably? Why are we not ashamed of our silence? Have the Indians forever taken our voices and our courage? Are we a now only a nation of cowards and fools?  

 

Regards

 

Sohail Taj


--- On Mon, 9/28/09, muhammed kareem <kareem871@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: muhammed kareem <kareem871@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] Re- BDR Tragedy, True Findings
To: "alochona magazine" <alochona@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, September 28, 2009, 12:54 AM

 


Could the moderators please confirm that this email is in fact from Sohail Taj and not from someone who is hiding behind that name.

Sadly, we have too many imposters around and it is all too easy to adopt a screen name. Since the name in question relates to a well-known politicain and a man of repute, it is imperative that we ensure its authenticity. I am sure there are people on the forum who personally know Mr. Taj. Could someone kindly verify it from him personally whether he has actually written this email.

for some reason, I have my doubts.

Thanks,

Reza




To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com
From: sohailtaj2008@ yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:28:08 -0700
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Re- BDR Tragedy, True Findings

 

Dear Robin,

 

As Barrister Munshi explained I sent him your comments on the BDR mutiny article to which he replied directly to me and then I merely copied and pasted back his reply to Alochona.

 

I had originally been very hostile to Barrister Munshi after I read his book 'The India Doctrine' and some of his other articles which I felt demeaned our liberation struggles in 1971 and also our secularist philosophy. I had asked many intellectuals, writers, lawyers, journalists and politicians (who I thought had similar views to me) to reveal the lies being perpetrated by Munshi. Not a single person came forward to protest his book and uncover the truth. I was extremely saddened and depressed by this response.

 

A few months later I visited Bangladesh again and purchased a copy of the second edition of the book now titled 'The India Doctrine (1947-2007). I realized that I had made the mistake about Munshi and that he was merely trying to expose the truth about Indian activities against Bangladesh. I have had to change my entire outlook due to this book and also because of the lack of support from the pro-Liberation lobby who by their failure to act accepted by default Munshi's interpretation of events before and after 1971. I think it should be made compulsory for everyone to read the book.

 

Regards

 

Sohail Taj





__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Woman dignity, todays faminists and dirty politics



     Mohd. Haque writes:
 
               If Burqa, Niqab, Hijab indignifies woman or makes them less than a human how a nude, openly parading/showing her tid bits only to please and attract men considers as dignified and tasteful, I can't fathom.

      There is a good reason why you cannot fathom.  Reality is unfathomable by men with lewd, lurid and incriminating imagination about women.  When and where EXACTLY have you actually seen "nude" women openly parading/showing her tid bits? That description is simply disgusting and highly reprehensible!
 
    You have not seen it. You are plain lying, Mr. Md. Haque, and the kind of defamatory lying that is regarded as a grievous sin in the Qur'an.
 
     You are falsely and malevolently constructing the binary opposition -- burqa VS women running around naked. Most men try to do that, though I had thought you were a little more refined than that.
 
        What I am talking about is the modern politics of hujabization of Muslim women.  And this politics is one of exploitation of good women's minds and the practice of gross deception of equating hijab or burqa as a paradigmatic definition of Islam.
 
        
          Farida Majid


To: alochona@yahoogroups.com; bangla-vision@yahoogroups.com
From: haquetm83@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:19:43 -0700
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Woman dignity, todays faminists and dirty politics

 
It could be couple of years back – on NPR one old Hollywood actress was narrating how shy they were in their teen or middle age discussing their feminine issues, even with the doctors.

Things have changed, woman yells in front of live TV camera – Micke, I like to kiss you and I do not have bad breathe. Discussing bedroom issues or matters in open public. Practically they go naked or nudity become, not only to attract men but a fashion (churns billions of dollar).

Thanks to Hollywood, woman is nothing but a commodity to toss, taste and enjoy. When men are perfectly dressed in a glaring suit flanked by almost nude woman. Strange enough - woman highly educated, feminist, humanist, activist yet never could think equally like men that what is dignified, decent for men not so for themselves.

If Burqa, Niqab, Hijab indignifies woman or makes them less than a human how a nude, openly parading/showing her tid bits only to please and attract men considers as dignified and tasteful, I can't fathom.

I read somewhere – a tribe in Tanazania's jungle, who respect their woman so much that men are not allowed to leave their wives and they consider Hyena as their God or very secret, since they belief that after their death their body is left for hyena to be consumed.

Perhaps tribes in the secluded jungle maintain a consistency in their ethics and belief system than men, woman from Harvard, Yell or Cambridge on our civilized plane.

Get your new Email address!
Grab the Email name you&#39;ve always wanted before someone else does!
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/



Bing™ brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. Try it now.

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Re: Ex-finance minister Saifur dies in car crash

Dear Alochoks

Saifur Rahman's body was recovered from the water and placed upon a broken, makeshift bed of sorts. The television camera zoomed in on his bare chest and panned up towards his face. He had on no shirt or vest. His face and body were swollen with water. The odd finger poked his body. Another odd finger lifted an eyelid as if to confirm his death. Ignorant and stupid members of the public (our celebrated jonogon has a lot of trash in it) jockeyed for position before the cameras, or sought to get as close to the body as if to sniff the scent of death on the body, or stood around scratching their unwashed armpits.

Later the networks broadcast the same footage with the mournful wail of a Deshi flute, celebrating this pathetic death.

Pathetic is a Deshi word nowadays.

We are shameless with no concept of how to respect a dead body. You know what I mean. Even in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan they do not show footage of the dead the way we do.

I suspect our cameramen get bonuses for every shot of a dead body. Not just any shot - must be a closeup, so close to the face that death can be certified by lack of a breath's mist upon the camera lens.

But Delwar and BNP have no knowledge of such things. They don't care if Saifur Rahman's body was given no respect. But no problem demanding a state funeral!

Saifur Rahman has done his good and his bad on this earth. He will make his peace with Allah and we pray for his eternal salvation.

Down here on earth the wretched ethical and spiritual condition of our nation continues as usual.

Watch the news for your next gloriously disgusting closeup of a dead body. If he's a politician you may also get some music to enjoy at the same time. Make sure the kids are watching too.

Ezajur Rahman
Kuwait

--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, "Ezajur Rahman" <ezajur.rahman@...> wrote:
>
> Ex-finance minister Saifur dies in car crash
> BNP announces 3-day mourning programme
> Courtesy New Age 6/9/09
>
> Staff Correspondent
>
> <http://www.newagebd.com/2009/sep/06/img9.html>
>
>
>
> Bangladesh Nationalist Party standing committee member M Saifur Rahman,
> who served as the country's finance minister for the longest period, was
> on Saturday killed in a road accident in Brahmanbaria.
> Saifur met with the tragic accident when his car fell into a ditch at
> Khariyala of Ashuganj on the Dhaka-Sylhet Highway at 2:30pm.
> He was taken to Brahmanbaria General Hospital where physicians
> pronounced him dead at about 3:30pm. He was 77.
> He was on his way to the capital from Moulvibazar, his constituency
> for which he had been elected lawmaker four times between 1979 and 2001.
> Saifur, who had already lost his wife, Durre Samad Rahman in 2003, is
> survived three sons and a daughter.
> The police, quoting witnesses at Khariyala, said the car in which
> Saifur was travelling, fell into a ditch after the driver lost control
> trying to save a dog.
> The Rapid Action Battalion rushed to the spot and began rescue
> operation immediately.
> Local Awami League lawmaker Lutful Hai Sachchu told reporters the car
> skidded off into a ditch and fell into five-to-six-foot water.
> 'Saifur Rahman was wearing a seat belt. It took 10 to 12 minutes to
> get him out of water by breaking open the door of the car and cutting
> the seat belt,' said Lutful Hai.
> After rescuing him, the battalion took him straight to Brahmanbaria
> General Hospital where physicians pronounced him dead. As the news
> spread, hundreds of people rushed to the hospital premises.
> Saifur's private secretary Shamsul Huq, Sajib Miah, Sharif Ahmed,
> Miraj Hossain and Shams Miah who were accompanying him were all
> critically injured. All of them were admitted to Brahmanbaria General
> Hospital.
> The accident marks an end to the eventful life and chequered
> political career of Saifur Rahman, who was handpicked by the late
> president Ziaur Rahman into his advisory council in 1976 in charge of
> commerce. He then became finance minister.
> The BNP chairperson, Khaleda Zia, expressed her deep shock at the
> death of the senior most member of the party's standing committee. The
> BNP has postponed all its programmes for Saturday and Sunday showing
> respect to Saifur and announced a three-day mourning programme.
> 'As a successful finance minister and politician, Saifur Rahman had
> contribution to the country's economic development. He also played a
> significant role in establishing the BNP and its expansion working as a
> close aide to the late president Ziaur Rahman. He also played an
> important role in restoring democracy to the country,' Khaleda said.
> 'The nation lost a wise politician in his sudden death. It is an
> irreparable loss for the country and it has created a vacuum in national
> politics,' Khaleda said.
> Saifur's body was brought to his house at Gulshan in Dhaka in the
> evening. A pall of gloom descended there as the microbus carrying
> Saifur's body entered the Jalalabad House.
> Khaleda visited the place to pay her respect to Saifur. The body was
> laid in state in front of the house and mourners filed past in solemn
> silence.
> A cross section of people flocked to Saifur's house. The finance
> minister, Abul Maal Abdul Muhith, industries minister Dilip Barua, Awami
> League advisory council member Tofail Ahmed, Awami League presidium
> member and chairman of the committee on public undertakings Muhiuddin
> Khan Alamgir, state minister for home affairs Shamsul Haque Tuku,
> Workers Party president Rashed Khan Menon, Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal
> president Hasanul Huq Inu, Dhaka University professor emeritus
> Anisuzzman, Awami League lawmaker Subid Ali Bhuiyan, Awami League
> president's adviser Salman F Rahman, Federation of Bangladesh Chambers
> of Commerce and Industry president Annisul Huq, former Bangladesh
> Garment Manufacturers and Exporters' Association president Anwarul Alam
> Chowdhury Parvez also went there.
> Former Jatiya Sangsad speaker Jamiruddin Sircar, BNP secretary
> general Khandaker Delwar Hossain, opposition chief whip Zainul Abdin
> Farroque, BNP standing committee member M Shamsul Islam, vice-chairmen M
> Hafizuddin Ahmed, Sarwari Rahman and Chowdhury Kamal Ibne Yusuf, BNP
> chairperson's adviser ASM Hannan Shah, joint secretary general Selima
> Rahman, office secretary Rizvi Ahmed and Jatiyatabadi Juba Dal president
> Barkatullah Bulu also went to Saifur's house and consoled his two sons
> and the daughter. Saifur's eldest son, Naser Rahman, has started for
> home from Saudi Arabia.
> Jamaat-e-Islami secretary general Ali Ahsan Muhammad Mujahid and
> assistant secretary general Muhammad Quamaruzzman also went to Saifur's
> house.
> The family said the first namaz-e-janaza would be held in the Gulshan
> Azad Mosque at 11:00am, and then the body would be taken to the BNP's
> central office at Naya Paltan at 12:30pm for the second namaz-e-janaza.
> The third namaz-e-janaza will take place on the national assembly
> building premises at 2:30pm.
> Saifur will be laid to rest in his family graveyard in Moulvibazar
> Monday afternoon after holding namaz-e-janazas at Shahi Eidgah in Sylhet
> at 1:00pm and in the Moulvibazar Government High School ground at
> 4:00pm.
> The body was taken to the mortuary of the United Hospital at Gulshan
> from his house Saturday night.
> The New Age correspondent in Moulvibazar said normal life in Saifur's
> hometown came to a halt at the news of the death.
> Most of the offices and business establishments immediately pulled
> down their shutters to show respect to Saifur.
> Similar was the situation in Sylhet where Saifur went on Friday to
> say prayers at the shrine of Hazrart Shah Jalal.
>


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[ALOCHONA] The Last Ottoman: His Imperial Highness Prince Ertugrul Osman Efendi



Ertugrul Osman

The Telegraph

27 Sep 2009

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/politics-obituaries/6237121/Ertugrul-Osman.html

 

Ertugrul Osman, who has died aged 97, should, technically speaking, have been addressed as His Imperial Highness Prince Ertugrul Osman Efendi.

 

Had events been otherwise his title would have been grander still: His Imperial Majesty Grand Sultan Osman V, Emperor of the Ottomans, Caliph of Islam. As it was, the man who would have been the 45th head of the continent-spanning Ottoman dynasty, founded by Osman I in 1299, lived on the third floor of a rent-controlled flat in New York and was content to be known as plain old Osman.

 

As a descendant of Abdul Hamid II (who reigned between 1876 and 1909) he was the last-surviving grandson of any serving Ottoman Emperor, and the only remaining scion of the dynasty to have been born in the imperial homeland.

 

His death marks the end of a story that reached its zenith at the gates of Vienna in 1683. Shortly after that failed siege, Ottoman power began to decline, culminating in its collapse and the establishment of the Turkish Republic under Kemal Ataturk in 1923. The royal family was subsequently expelled, and Osman, who was abroad at the time, did not return to Turkey until 1992.

 

During the intervening time he refused to take up a Turkish passport, claiming instead to be a citizen of the Ottoman Empire. With the help of a document drawn up by his lawyer he somehow managed to have this official limbo accepted by passport authorities until September 11 2001, when more stringent regulations came into force.

 

None the less, he was by no means a firebrand exile, never calling for the return of the Sultanate or the overthrow of the democratically elected government in Turkey. On the contrary, he seemed studiously determined to be as uncontroversial as possible, always replying to the question of whether he was in favour of a future Restoration with the simple answer "No".

 

Ertugrul Osman was born in Istanbul on August 18 1912, the youngest son of Prince Mehmed Burhaneddin and his first wife Aliye Melek Nazliar Hanim, and spent his toddler years roaming the mahogany parquet corridors of the 285-room Dolmabahce Palace, which clings to the banks of the European side of the Bosporus.

 

Aged 10 he was sent to Vienna to study, and it was there that he heard, in March 1924, of the abolition of the caliphate, which gave the Sultan authority over the world's Sunni Muslims and was the last significant imperial role to be scrapped by Ataturk. The Sultan and his family were sent into exile. "The men had one day to leave," Osman recalled in a recent interview. "The women were given a week."

 

Osman stayed in Vienna until the outbreak of war in 1939 and then moved to New York. By war's end he was ensconced in a "walk-up" apartment above a restaurant on Lexington Avenue in Manhattan, the only residence in what was otherwise a commercial block.

 

He lived there with his first wife, Gulda Twerskoy, whom he married in 1947. It was, he admitted, a far cry from the opulent imperial residences in which he had grown up. But instead of growing embittered by his dramatic reversal of fortune, those who met him said Osman assessed his unique situation in understated, often comic tones.

 

He made his career in the mining business, with the company Wells Overseas, for whom he did indeed frequently travel abroad, particularly to South America. He was on a business trip there in 1974 when the imperial family's exile was repealed and he was told he could apply for Turkish citizenship. "I was in Venezuela when we were granted amnesty," he said later. "We had a mine there. A Turkish ambassador sent me the news: 'Apply to us if you want to be a citizen. We can give you a passport or visa if you want.'"

 

Osman said he refused the offer, replying: "We do not need amnesty since we have not done anything wrong."

 

In retirement Osman, who first wife had died in 1985, met Zeynep Tarzi Hanim, an Afghan princess almost three decades younger than he. She too had led the life of a royal exile, after her uncle King Amanullah was toppled in 1929. She had moved with her family to Istanbul before heading to New York in 1971, where she carved out a niche in the fashion world by selling Turkish designs.

 

Though Osman was worried about the age gap between himself and Zeynep Tarzi, she did not see it as a problem and concentrated his mind by issuing an ultimatum: "Eventually I told him, 'If you won't marry me, I'll marry someone else.' It was an empty threat, but it worked." They married in 1991.

 

A year later he returned to the land of his birth for this first time in more than half a century. He had been extended an official invitation by the Turkish government and made headline news as he touched down.

 

Although he granted interviews, he preferred to keep a low profile as he toured the landmarks from which his grandfather had ruled a century earlier. During his trip to the Dolmabahce Palace, for example, he refused a private visit in favour of a public tour group: "I didn't want a fuss," he said. "I'm not that kind of person."

 

In 1994, with the death of Mehmed Orhan, son of Prince Mehmed Abdul Kadir, Osman became the eldest surviving member of the Ottoman dynasty, and heir – in theory at least – to the title of Pretender to the Sultanate. In fact, he was quite happy to admit that "democracy works well in Turkey".

 

Things were working less well at home in New York, where the fabric of his modest flat was wearing thin. Four years ago his wife narrowly avoided being struck by falling plaster and they began a dispute with the landlord, to whom – having occupied the flat for so long – they had to pay only $350 in rent each month.

 

In his final years, Osman finally accepted a Turkish passport, using it to return on several occasions to Istanbul. "I do not have much time left. I want to be in Istanbul all the time," he said.

 

It was there last year that his wife gave him a surprise birthday party in the garden of a villa on the Bosporus owned by her brother, Mahmut Tarzi.

 

It was also in Istanbul that Osman was placed in intensive care a week ago, and died on September 23.

 

According to Turkish reports he will be buried near the tombs of Sultans Mahmut II and Abdulhamit II in the Cemberlitas district of the city.

 

He is survived by his wife.

 

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] "Bongeshor!" and Princess Hasina



Seikh Hasina wants this Bangladom for her and for her only. Her father given blood just prior to ascend the crown of 'Bangeshor'. Very unfortunate tragic event, the blood of Siraj Sikdar was less affable and sacred than Seikh Mujib; hence Seikh Mujib's militia tortured & hounded Siraj Sikdar. Aftermath of Siraj Sikdar's demise, Seikh Mujib shouted in bravado - "Where is Siraj Sikdar?". Well, history is very cruel!
 
Seikh Hasina came to power to avenge the killing of her father. She came to power to punish the war criminals. Recently she also instituted some laws for lifelong protection of her. Bangladesh is the kingdom of Seikh family, there is a bondage of blood, and we, the people of Bangladesh, need to pay the price everyday!
 
 
 
 


--- On Sun, 9/27/09, Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@gmail.com>
Subject: [notun_bangladesh] Re: [ALOCHONA] Jalil's Partial Disclosures- What Else Left?
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com, notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com, "dahuk" <dahuk@yahoogroups.com>, "Dr. Abid Bahar" <abidbahar@yahoo.com>, "Musfique Prodhan" <chena_kew@yahoo.com>, "Md. Mostafa Kamal" <mmk3k@yahoo.com>, "Md. Aminul Islam" <aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com>, mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com, "vinnomot" <vinnomot@yahoogroups.com>, "bangla vision" <bangla-vision@yahoogroups.com>, ayubi_s786@yahoo.com
Cc: "Dhaka Mails" <dhakamails@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sunday, September 27, 2009, 8:00 AM

 
Friends
 
The tragedy of Bangladesh is that an under trial accused has been put on throne to meet the illegal demands of the Bestial HINDU  STAAAN n make us subservient nation thru the "KHUKU MONI'S/male voiced women sajuuuuda/ n the conbunie Kutta jibis.The UT accused is taking all opportunity to withdraw all cases against her n her accomplices( the well known terrorist goons of BAL) who claimed them as sons of mujib's blood who fled to their fatherland  HINDU  STAAN.
 
The same would have happened if another UT accused Khaleda was elected to power but people could have seen rule of Law better then the BAKSALITES. A simple example of meanness n choto lokami of Hasina that she is changing all the names of institutes named after respected leaders/ Bir Shreshthos etc and puting up sign boards in Mujib's name. Does she n her paa chata dalas kutta jibis understand not understand that by such act of meanness she is in fact undermining the sanctity n respect Sheikh Mujib demands from the people.
 
On the otherhand BNP had named many many roads etc in the name of vailant freedim fighter like( the HINDU STAAANI dalal Gen. CP Doooottttttooooooo, bikhkhato paa chata rajnoitik dalal mennnnoonninnaa, Capt. Monsur, Tajuddin, Qamruzzaman n Sayed Nazrul Islam. This shows the magnanimity of the politics of BNP not  the "Khunsuti Mohila der itrami" by the great netri . Shame on those who advices n act behind such immoral acts of changing name undermining the great people the nation respects.
 
Faruque Alamgir


 
On 9/27/09, Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo. com> wrote:
 

Jalil's Partial Disclosures- What Else Left?

Former Awami League General Secretary Abdul Jalil's some disclosures about the Party's high ups immoral secret deals in the December 2008 Bangladesh election made in London on the 24th September published there and also in many Dhaka dailies on the 25th and continued on the 26th though have produced some uproar in conscious circles were certainly not everything connected with the black deal that he also has hinted at to disclose more facts in the clandestine matter.
 
Whatever Jalil has disclosed about for saddling the Awami League to the power of the State of Bangladesh and Sheikh Hasina the Prime Minister for the second term secretly with person to person contact, Sheikh Rehana, Hasina's younger sister and the most likely immediate inheritance to the throne following Hasina, being the crucial player in the deplorable immoral game. The other player, he mentioned, was a national organization, could have been misplaced for the reason that some key person in the organization could have been in the fowl game but cannot certainly be the whole organization involving every one in the set up. These disclosures though new in the mouth are nothing new to circles that had been keeping track of things in the nasty game for the last nine months. However the cynics got a reconfirmation of what they have been hunching about and looking for reconfirmation in the matter.
 
What must be deeply probed into for the dignity and security of the nation is that there had been other more important players that Jalil did not disclose. Whether he would know and even if he knew all about would disclose in public is uncertain.
 
The whole game of satanic nexus 1/11, the Caretaker Government and the Army Chief Moin had been actively joined by Indian central intelligence agency R&AW. Whoever of the DGFI did help in the deal, it was due to Moin's direct initiative and order, because he was the head not only of the defense forces but also of the DGFI. The Indian Bengali High Commissioner in Dhaka Pinak in concert with some other powerful players played the external decisive role that was played, if Jalil said the truth about, internally by Rehana. The two in groups joined hands in the secret deal. Even if Jalil knows about this nexus he is not going to disclose it, I am afraid. It is amazing to note that Jalil has not mentioned the name of Moin who had been the key player in the whole game from 1/11 to the safe exit from Dhaka following his 'retirement' from the Army, despite his every attempts to get another extension that Hasina was very much willing to give Moin but could not do so for otherwise pressures from within.
 
The Awami League has been hardly any of democratic but all through a fascist organization. Power game is the only issue dear to their leaders. Though money- making goes with politics in Bangladesh and Jalil being one of the successful bankers need not go for money making possibly any more now onwards, he had very likely high hopes for power in the administration that he longed this time but failed to get hold of with no hope in future. His frustration might as such be the cause for the outburst even though that risked his life and profession in Bangladesh. Now the question is, would he go on saying all other truths or put a stop to the rest he has not disclosed yet.





__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fw: .Bangladesh Postal Stamps humilate us with their stamps commemorating British Royal Family




--- On Mon, 9/28/09, Factification <factia@gmail.com> wrote:
Bangladesh has no connection with the British Royal Family (they are not of English origin!) , and yet Bangladesh goes on issuing stamps commemorating them. These semi-literate Royals probably don't even know England's 500 year connection  with a once mighty Bangladesh.
 
Bangladesh is the banana republic of the world of philately thanks to her stamps on Rotary Club and other idiocies. We demand to know which member of the which government humiliated Bangladesh by publishing such idiotic stamps? And are going to stop issuing such stamps in future? Is Bangladesh media going to expose the culprits?
 
I append a recent article by Johann Hari, son of an German immigrant, on a member of the British Royal Family much clouded in BBC propaganda to Bangladesh and the world.
 
Taslima
 
 
 
 
Can We Finally See the Truth About the Vile 'Queen Mother'?
It must be exhausting to be a monarchist, forever finding ways to pretend a family of cold, talentless snobs are better than the rest of us
 
 
It must be exhausting to be a monarchist, forever finding ways to pretend a family of cold, talentless snobs are better than the rest of us. They have to make gold out of mud. The system of monarchy – selecting a head of state solely because of the womb they passed through, and surrounding them with sycophants from the moment they emerge – produces warped and dim people, and demands we scrape before them. What's a poor monarchist to do? They can only lavish a thick cream of adjectives – 'dignity', 'charm', 'majesty' – over the Windsor family in the hope that some of us are fooled.

This process corrupts even the most intelligent monarchists. A strange case study is the new authorized thousand-plus-page biography of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (the 'Queen Mother') by William Shawcross. He is a smart man: his study of the secret bombing of Cambodia by Henry Kissinger is extraordinary. Yet as a monarchist he has an impossible task. He has to present a cruel, bigoted snob who fleeced millions from the British tax-payer as a heroine fit to rule over us. His mind turns to mush. Before the real Bowes-Lyon is lost in a frenzy of royalist rimming, we should remember who she really was: more Imelda Marcos than the good fairy Glinda.

By the time she died, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was treating the British Treasury – our tax-money – as her personal piggy bank, with her bills running way beyond the millions she was allotted every year. Even the ultra-Tory Chancellor Norman Lamont complained that "she far exceeds her Civil List and the Treasury gets very het up about it." She used the money to pay for eighty-three full-time staff, including four footmen, two pages, three chauffeurs (what do they do, split her into three parts for transportation?), a private secretary, an orderly, a housekeeper, five housemaids… the list goes on and on. She even insisted that it was a legitimate use of public funds to maintain a full-time 'Ascot office', whose job is to do nothing but keep a register of members of the Royal Enclosure and send them entry vouchers.

She presented this spending – enough to open and run a new hospital that would save thousands of lives every year – as an act of selfless patriotism. Michael Mann, the former Dean of Windsor who knew her very well, explained: "She feels that Britain is Great Britain and that, therefore, ours must be no banana court. To lower standards [i.e., her spending on champagne, caviar and limos] is to denigrate the country and, insofar as high standards require big spending, so be it." When single mothers take 0.1 percent of this sum from the state, the same newspapers that laud Elizabeth as "the best of British" savage them as "scroungers." If they refused to pay tax – as Elizabeth did – they would have been put in prison.

What did she do to earn these vast sums? Her parents were 'Lord' and 'Lady' Strathmore, and from birth she was waited on by a gaggle of servants including a butler, two footmen, five housemaids, a cook and numerous room maids. She grew up with four palaces at her disposal – but it wasn't enough. She was obsessed with "bloodlines", which she believed determined a person's worth, and wanted to marry into what she regarded as "the best" – the Windsor family.

At first she tried to woo Edward Windsor, but when he wasn't interested, she settled for his stammering, highly strung younger brother, George. When Edward became King, she plotted to force his abdication so George could ascend and she could become 'Queen'. His "crime" was to fall in love with a divorcee – and one with such poor bloodlines! Once Edward was successfully toppled, Elizabeth insisted he and his wife Wallace be driven into exile and blanked by royal circles. (The couple had plenty of real flaws, but Elizabeth was blind to them: it was the American-ness and the ambition and the divorce that she loathed.)

This was her way with any relatives who displeased her by showing vulnerability. When her cousins became mentally ill, they were locked in asylums and never seen again. Elizabeth's entry in Who's Who falsely announced they were dead. This icy ruthlessness startled people who met her. In 1939, French Prime Minister Edouard Daladier said she was "an excessively ambitious young woman who would be ready to sacrifice every other country in the world so that she might remain Queen."

The most striking aspect to Shawcross' biography is that once she had contrived to marry, Elizabeth really didn't do anything else for the rest of her life except spend, spend, spend – our money. He has to pad out whole decades. She didn't even raise her own children: she would see them for an hour a day, and get them to chant: "We are not supposed to be normal. We are not supposed to be normal."

But to be fair, she did do one more thing. In her spare time, she supported far right politics. She was a passionate defender of appeasing Adolf Hitler, lobbying behind the scenes to garner support for Neville Chamberlain. The reasons are plain: even fifty years later, she bragged to Woodrow Wyatt that she had "reservations about Jews." Once the war began, she was rebranded as a symbol of Britain's heroic resistance to the Nazis – but what did she actually do? Unlike everyone else, she didn't live on rations, but was fattened by pheasants and venison on the royal estates. She didn't stay in bombed-out London anything like as much as the myth suggests: she spent much of the war in Windsor, Norfolk and Scotland, far from the Nazi planes, surrounded by battalions of servants.

Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon kept up her support for far-right politics throughout her life. She did everything she could to bolster the torturing white minority tyrannies in Rhodesia and South Africa, because – as the journalist Paul Callan, who knew her, put it – "She is not fond of black folk." Our beaming Queen Mum was Alf Garnett in a tiara.

She believed Britain's class system reflected a natural hierarchy – and the people below her creamy upper tier were inferior. She told Woodrow Wyatt, "I hate that classlessness. It is so unreal." At first, she was appalled by the idea of her eldest daughter marrying Phillip Mountbatten, because his "bloodlines" weren't good enough: his family had fallen from power, so they weren't "really" royal. When Diana Spencer started hugging AIDS victims and lepers, Elizabeth was disgusted. When Diana started rebelling, Elizabeth announced to friends the girl was "schizophrenic", but she was bemused because Diana came from "a good family." The rest of us, by implication, come from "bad families", where you would expect schizophrenia and other lower-class disorders.

The defenders of Elizabeth were left claiming that her drunken inactivity was itself an achievement. W.F. Deedes, the late Telegraph columnist, claimed that "in an increasingly earnest world, she teaches us all how to have fun, that life should not be all about learning, earning and resting. In a world where we have all become workaholics, there she is…grinning at racehorses. Bless her heart." He was in favour of the dole after all – provided it was worth three million pounds, and went to one single aristocrat.

William Shawcross has won the favour of his fellow monarchists by taking this curdled life and presenting it as the best of British. It's the single most unpatriotic claim I've ever heard. If you don't think Britain can do better – far better – than this nasty leech and her stunted family, then you don't deserve to live in this Sceptred Isle.







__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fw:The coming crisis




--- On Mon, 9/28/09, Factification <factia@gmail.com> wrote:
What is the point of such articles on Bangladesh?  Climate change will affect the whole world and yet almost all the UK NGOs and their academic hooligans have chosen Bangladesh as its racist target, but pretending to be concerned in humanitarian issues. The British have been planting frightening scenarios in which Bangladesh becomes a hell for the world.
 
The trouble is Bangladesh's media, NGO and academic community seem to be falling into a trap, repeating concocted stories as if dealing with facts. Bangladesh is a easy target. No other country is receiving such insulting speculation about what may happen in the future. The British seem to be more concerned what will happen to us than what will happen to themselves.
 
 In the recent past British NGO's have sent BBC and other media "partners" to Bangladesh to write frightening stories about hellish stories. Bangladesh stereotype is probably going to be no problem for idoits like Afsan Chowdhury and her family for now;   but it's going to be hell for her when everyone calls her a Somalian!  On what basis are we allowing ourselves to be insulted with such regularity?
 
 
Taslima
 
PS: Indians have been flooding the international community with stories of Bangladesh flooding it with its poor at least since the early 1980s. They were talking about 20 million illegal Bengalis (meaning Muslim)  even in 1987!  It's a pack of lies made into a fact. If you can repeat Bangladesh lies long enough even the idiots in Bangladesh will believe it.
 
 
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo.com> wrote:

The coming crisis

By: Afsan Chowdhury

From Bangladesh to India … and then the rest?



Events running up to the UN's climate-focused Bali Summit, held in December 2007, raised the issue for the first time at the public level: climate change could pose a global security risk. Since then, the possibilities have been panicking experts, with no easy solution at hand. Today, however, the topic remains a matter for experts and commentators to discuss, rather than being part of the general discourse. The month of the Bali Summit, journalists Alexander T J Lennon and Julianne Smith wrote, "Climate scientists tend to think in decades; national security experts in days or years at best. This difference helps explain why climate change is rarely considered a national security challenge. Yet the links are inescapable. One that is even less frequently discussed is the connection of global change to the threat of terrorism."


Let us briefly engage in a thought experiment on this intriguing, worrying line of reasoning. To some in the Western world, the fear seems to be that the jihadists could take advantage of the emerging crisis over climate change. The threat is not just Western, however, but rather global – and Southasia seems to be particularly vulnerable to potential militant actions. What could set off such a trend in motion could lie in certain inevitabilities of climate change. Southasia will be hit very badly by global warming, and the effects will be manifested through dramatic declines in crop production, losses of homes and lands, rises in vector-borne diseases and malnutrition, all of which will undoubtedly lead to attempted immigration to 'safer' places. However, the capacity of many impoverished countries to provide alternative spaces for such displaced populations is very low; as such, the fleeing to better-off areas would almost certainly follow historic precedent and point to movements across borders as well as continents.

Indeed, though current estimates of the potential numbers vary, the emergence of 'climate-change refugees' seems almost impossible to avoid. And 'emergence' here could be a misnomer, as many are worried that the grounds could already be set. One UN study from 2005, for instance, has suggested that there could already be some 20 million environment refugees worldwide. Worldwide, how high could that outflow of displaced reach? With relatively minimal work having yet been done on the subject, no one really knows. According to some studies, it could reach as high as 150 million people by 2050. Yet even if the number turns out to be far lower, such an exodus could easily end up being a principal trigger in generating conflict.

Somalia simulation
 
Partying is not usually a green undertaking. Those giant sound systems and strobe lights do leave a pretty hefty carbon footprint. But there's good news for all conscientious clubbers out there. Say hello to the Sustainable Dance Floor, folks. All one needs to do is get on the dance floor, where the energy created by foot-stomps and head-spins (or whatever you're into) gets transformed into electricity. And here's the coolest bit: the generated power is used to get the floor to interact with the dancers. Now the environmentalist side of your brain will never have to shout down the clubber side.
In this regard, the critical country for Southasia is Bangladesh, given both its location in a low-lying delta and its high population density. If millions are affected in Bangladesh, they will be forced to move to areas that remain unaffected. However, if we keep in mind that the impact will be far higher once the 'safe' areas are inundated with displaced individuals, the probable magnitude of the crisis becomes still more dire. Furthermore, the coping capacity within Bangladesh is limited not just in terms of physical infrastructure, but in terms of the political structure as well. Under such conditions, and depending on what is taking place in the country's politics at the time, sustaining the Bangladeshi state could prove nigh impossible, perhaps leading it to becoming an environmental Somalia.


How are neighbouring countries to react? Paul Rogers, a professor of peace studies at Bradford University, has warned that any attempt by nation states to build 'fortress walls' to keep out climate-change refugees would be doomed to fail. "If 60 million of 140 million people could not survive in Bangladesh, yet they were kept there," he writes, "you would have gigantic human suffering and progressive, very deep radicalisation – very, very angry people. And that is not in anybody's security interest." Indeed, some may even wonder if Bangladesh, in such a situation, could not be 'contained', like an island state. In fact, of course, the opposite situation is true: Bangladesh is inextricably linked to India.

While border-fencing would almost certainly be a part of India's approach to stopping climate refugees – as the Indian state is already encasing Bangladesh in a fence to block migrants – one doubts how successful this could ultimately be without incurring large-scale human cost. In analysing security needs, one needs to take into account existing trends of contemporary militancy. In Southasia, there are today several sources of extremist violence including Islamic, Maoist and ethnic. As such, the region's vulnerability to such threats is already very high. If refugees from Bangladesh find that they cannot go to India, what would be the likely consequences? Even assuming international intervention, many would almost certainly end up perishing, perhaps as many as several million Bangladeshis. How would the region's militant groups respond to such as situation?

If India were to commence large-scale stopping of refugees at its borders, such an action would inevitably demonise the country as one directly denying the opportunity for people to escape almost certain death. In turn, the region's Islamist groups would begin to argue that 'Hindu India' was stopping Muslim Bangladeshis from entering its territory, and thus condemning them to death. Suddenly, this would no longer be an issue of climate change, but rather one of mass-based communalism.

From there, the dominoes could fall quickly. As has taken place at certain points in the past, many angry Bangladeshis would undoubtedly find acceptable an explanation for the situation based in an alleged Muslim-Hindu antagonism; and so, revenge killings could take place against Hindus in Bangladesh, already considered 'proxy Indians' by many. But if Hindus were to be attacked in Bangladesh, Muslims in India could quickly be targeted by Hindu extremists in a tit-for-tat cycle of revenge. When large-scale social violence occurs – as can be seen today in Darfur, Somalia and other places – Bangladesh too could quickly spiral down into chaos, with neither the resources nor the socio-political structure necessary to right itself.

Communal meltdown
Could India afford to refuse sanctuaries to Hindu refugees from Bangladesh, which would certainly be a demand of many Hindu Indians? And if the state were to do so, how would Indian Muslims react? Millions of Muslims, including Bengali Muslims in India, would simultaneously become increasingly susceptible to arguments that the Indian state had chosen one community over the other. Such a scenario would almost certainly work to the benefit of regional and global Islamist propaganda networks. India already has problems with crossborder militancy from Pakistan and Bangladesh. If it were to begin to refuse entry to climate-change refugees, the country would suddenly have to face a far larger extremist problem from both – and with a far larger hostile population within, to boot.

On the other hand, if even some refugees were to enter India, this would most likely exacerbate the situation that is already extant in the Indian Northeast, where Bangladeshi/Muslim refugees and migrants have become a major cause of social friction. Not only would attacks on refugees increase, but the resident insurgencies would also strengthen, as this would be seen as a failure on the part of the Indian state to protect the communities of the Northeast from the new influx of refugees. The echo effect across the border would likely escalate the crisis.

Regardless of the exact details of the doomsday scenario presented above, the fact of the matter is that India simply cannot afford a flood of millions of climate-change refugees. Already, the Indian state has limited capacity – and, of course, its broader economic objectives would quickly vanish. As such, New Delhi would find itself in a violent catch-22: it could neither allow entry of new refugees, not could it counter the result of refusing to do so. Living next door to Bangladesh, can India handle the problems, apart from challenges in the context of climate change? It may not fail but could it prevent itself from being overwhelmed? And if India were to be overwhelmed, could the region survive in any conventional sense?

Meanwhile, the recovery from the global economic crash of 2008 is today largely being powered, or at least led, by the growth of the BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China. If nothing else, this certainly underlines just how inter-dependent today's global economy truly is. In a decade, India may occupy the same position that China does today in this matrix. In that case, the devastation of India would almost certainly deal a terrible blow to the global economy – one that, it must be assumed, would already be reeling from the additional challenges posed by climate change, including potentially from a spike in crisis-initiated militancy elsewhere.

Outlandish possibilities? Perhaps, or perhaps only in part. The worrying thing is that, at the moment, what is known is largely what is encapsulated in scientific reports on how the average global temperatures are slowly creeping up. For the scientists, extrapolation from there tends to focus on the melting of ice, the lowering of river waters, and the increased vagaries of climate. But despite the fact that the social and political ramifications of these changes could be just as worrying, such issues are hardly being discussed – much less planned for.

Afsan Chowdhury is on the editorial board of Himal Southasian.
 








__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___