Banner Advertiser

Thursday, September 2, 2010

[ALOCHONA] Gorbo Bangladesh : Another political experiment!



Gorbo Bangladesh : Another political experiment!

Is this a political platform for the reformists or a fresh effort to split BNP? Or is this the government's B-Team? PROBE looks into Gorbo Bangladesh....

by ANWAR PARVEZ HALIM

Gorbo Bangladesh, ostensibly a social organisation, hosted an iftar on August 27 at the Banani field in the city. Sitting on the dais were Mahi B Chowdhury, JP leader Sadek Siddiqui, Professor Dr. Shaheda, JSD (Rab) leader Abdul Malek Ratan, Islamic TV's Director Mahmudur Rahman and sports personality Kaiser Hamid. In a break away from the norm, the programme had no chief guest. Instead, a chair placed in the middle of these persons on dais remained empty with a notice on the back: "Waiting for a qualified leader." A similar message ran on the banner behind them: "In search of a qualified leader."

Who are the initiators of this Gorbo Bangladesh? What are their aims and objectives? What do they mean by "qualified leader?" Is this a precursor to a political platform? The organisation's Convenor Prof. Dr. Shaheda speaks readily to PROBE on these issues. Incidentally, she is the wife of late BNP leader KM Obaidur Rahman.

She says, the present Member Secretary of Gorbo Bangladesh Kamrul Hasan Nasim had been working over the past two or three years with the hardworking people at the grassroots. Our main aim is to raise public awareness for qualitative change in the social, political and economic arenas.  On March 3 we held a press conference at Dhaka Reporters Unity to launch our platform.

Kamrul Hasan Nasim of Chuadanga was involved in JSD politics as a student, but later became a central committee member of BNP's front organisation Krishak Dal. He also ran a programme 'Lal Sabujer Bangladesh' on Islamic Television. He was involved in import and export business for some time but now is a full-timer with Gorbo Bangladesh.

Former football star Kaiser Hamid is Convenor of the organisations youth body 'Tarunyer Joy'.

Prof. Shaheda claims that several leaders of 14 major and minor political parties are with her in this initiative, both overtly and covertly.

Gorbo Bangladesh has published a four-page brochure. It lists the qualities needed for a qualified leader as well as the aims and objectives of the organisation along with its organogram. Along with the 101-member central committee, it has names of 15 affiliated bodies. The names of these front organisations are unique. The youth front is named Tarunyer Joy (Victory of the Youth); the student front is Amra Chhatra (We are Students); the women's organisation is Aanchal (the end of the sari); the professionals' front is Jiban Juddho (Life's Struggle); the farmers' front is Krishaker Hashi (The Farmer's Smile); the religious front Manobotar Sanglap (Dialogue of Humanity), and so on.

Professor Shaheda says, presently work is on at building up the organisation countrywide and the response is overwhelming. They are planning a grand rally at the Paltan Maidan in Dhaka shortly.

Such organisation needs significant funds. Says Prof. Shaheda, "For the time being we are funding the programmes from our own pockets." She stresses, "This is no NGO so we have no donors. We have no wish to take funds from donors because we will not be dictated by anyone."

While Gorbo Bangladesh claims to be a non-political social organisation, will it eventually become a political party? In response Prof. Shaheda says, "Not for the time being. This may be a social platform, but everyone has a constitutional right to politics." She adds that Gorbo Bangladesh is legally registered as a social organisation.

Prof. Shaheda sternly criticises Awami League, BNP, Sheikh Hasina and Begum Khaleda Zia. What type of leader does she look for? She replies, "A leader with integrity, merit, farsightedness, patriotism and character. These five qualities are a must. None of the leaders of the ruling party and the opposition have these qualities, not even Hasina or Khaleda."

She goes on to say, "Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was a bold leader, Ziaur Rahman had integrity and in some aspects, Ershad had a modern vision. But their journey forward seems to have got stuck in a traffic jam."

"There has been so-called democracy since 1991. Then political blunders brought us to 1/11. The politicians are responsible for this. The people welcomed 1/11, but that does not mean anyone wanted military rule. Moeen Uddin and Fakhruddin did not keep their commitment. They failed."

As for Hasina and Khaleda, both of them have 'inherited' their political leadership. They have none of the five qualities for which we are searching. If they did a U Turn and took on these five qualities, we would accept that. But we have seen them for the last 30 years. They have been failures. The present government is 90% a failure. When a government is a failure, the opposition's responsibility is doubled. But the opposition here is virtually non-existent. Khaleda Zia is busy with the claim on her house and with Koko's parole. This cannot be the role of a national leader. The opposition is actually the 15 crore people of the country. They will select the nation's leadership. They simply need to be made aware and that is the role of Gorbo Bangladesh.

Prof. Shaheda does not want to follow in the footsteps of Hasina and Khaleda's trend of dynastic politics. That is why she had dropped 'Obaid' from her name. She was previously known as Shaheda Obaid. She says, "Obaid sahib's chapter is over. He is no longer living. I do not want anyone saying I am in politics through my husband and so I now use the name Prof. Dr. Shaheda in taking my vision forward."

She says, "I may have sought BNP's nomination, but I was never really in BNP's politics. I was never a member of the party. I even resigned from the office of NAEM DG during the rule of the alliance government."

As for her daughter Shama Obaid's involvement in BNP politics, she says, "She is free to do what she wants. It is up to her to practice whatever politics she wants."

Dr. Shaheda feels that while dynastic politics is a reality and cannot be ruled out, it is not enough for Joy to be Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's grandson or Tarique to be Ziaur Rahman's son. They will have to prove themselves before taking on leadership. She says, "Joy has married abroad. We must remember, Sonia Gandhi has been living in India for 60 years but still could not become Prime Minister. There are thousands of young men and women like Joy and Tarique in the country. We will find the ones among them who are honest, qualified, farsighted patriotic and persons of character."

She continues, "Sheikh Mujib was born in a very ordinary family but became a national leader. Captain Zia became a leader out of his own qualities. So it will not be hard to find a qualified leader. Such a leader will emerge from among us."

Is she herself a qualified leader? She says, "It is not for me to say. If the common people say so, then it is possible. The people are seething with anger within but have no one to protest on their behalf. There is no one to speak the truth. I have taken this risk."

In reply to another question she says, "I am not anti-Jamaat, but I do want the trial of the war criminals. After all, they do not accept the very existence of the country."

Dr. Shaheda feels there are still many leaders and personalities in the country who have done a lot for the country. She says people expect a lot from them. They include Dr. Badruddoza Chowdhury, Suranjit Sengupta, Dr. Kamal Hossain, Begum Matia Chowdhury, Kader Siddiqui, Mir Shawkat Ali, Haider Akbar Khan Rono, Mujaheedul Islam Selim, Prof. Muzaffar Ahmed (NAP), Sultan Mohammed Mansur, Mahmudur Rahman Manna, Prof. Muzaffar Ahmed (NAP) and Dr. Muhammed Yunus, among others.

The Gorbo Bangladesh brochure also lists leaders of quality who have passed away but who had made significant contribution to the nation. These departed ones include poet Kazi Nazrul Islam, Hussain Shaheed Suhrawardy, Sher-e-Bangla Fazlul Huq, Moulana Bhasani, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Syed Nazrul Islam, Tajuddin Ahmed, Qamruzzaman, Mansur Ali, Sirajul Alam Khan, Kazi Aref Ahmed, Nur-e-Alam Siddiqui, Abdul Kuddus Makhan and Shaheed President Ziaur Rahman. Interestingly, and ironically, there is no mention of BNP leader and Prof. Shaheda's late husband KM Obaidur Rahman who undoubtedly had significant contribution to the nation.

The initiators of Gorbo Bangladesh have close ties with the parties and politicians who took up reformist roles after 1/11. It is apparently from the planning of the organisation and the statement of its leaders that it has all plans to launch itself as a political party in the future.

Analysts say that there are certain quarters who are endeavouring to remove Ziaur Rahman's family from BNP. Within BNP there are some who even look to Prof. Shaheda to stand up against Begum Zia. This move may be joined by the followers of the late Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan. If these speculations have any truth in them, then Gorbo Bangladesh may emerge as the government's B Team in the days ahead. Or is some real change coming up? Only time can say.
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Landslide in manpower export



Landslide in manpower export
 
 
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] But who said, I am not unhappy when this dictator illegally grabed power ?



The Teflon man


Mohammad Badrul Ahsan

If a cat has nine lives, Hussein Muhammad Ershad has many more, because the former military dictator-cum-born-again-populist is back in the news. He has an enviable way of making it happen, perhaps the only living politician in this country who is comparable to Harry Houdini, the legendary magician, who specialised in tricks and escapes.

Ershad can be locked in handcuffs and leg-irons, and then nailed into a crate. The crate can be roped and weighed down with two hundred pounds of political embarrassment before being lowered into a lake of shame. Bet your money, he will escape sooner than you thought.

It is amazing how it has always worked in his favour, except for that one time when he had to land in jail. Remember 2006 when politicians from both sides of the political divide were courting him? Remember how the course of events precipitated over his participation in the national election? Sixteen years after his ouster, he was still the main man in a political madness that brought another madness called One Eleven.

This one time Ershad is back as an anti-climax. The High Court has rendered the 7th amendment of the constitution, making his power grab illegal, an offense punishable by law that doesn't exist yet. This embarrassment comes when he is a part of the government and his brother is a cabinet minister. God works in mysterious ways. A blow from friends hurts more than ten from enemies. Touché!

Is Ershad going to stand in the dock for it? I do not think so. The great escape artist will prove again that no trap is hard for him to escape. He has friends in the right places and years of political plumbing has made him adept at digging out of any hole. Rest assured he is going to get out again.

The former strongman is likely to be in the news longer than he thought. The families of victims killed in mass uprising against him are planning to sue him. Even the student leaders of the '90s movement are asking for his trial. If these things happen as and when they happen, I am convinced, as he must be, that the clamour is going to die down after sometime. In his life as a political turncoat, he has learned that there is nothing that can't be overcome given a little time and the short memory of our people.

So, Ershad is going to do it again. He is already saying that he has accepted the court verdict, claiming in the same breath that it is not sufficient to put him on trial. The parliament has to pass the law before the long hand of justice can touch him. And this is where he is comfortable. He knows there will be many a slip between the cup and the lip. He also knows it is easier said than done. Trying him is going to be a trying thing.

I say it because life never rights all the wrongs. Augusto Pinochet was put under house arrest fourteen years after he stepped down as president of Chile in 1990, the same year Ershad was toppled in this country. Pinochet had around 300 criminal charges pending against him, but he slipped the iron hand of justice when he died in 2006. Pol Pot, the Cambodian monster, died in his jungle hideout, before he could be captured and brought to justice. Adolf Hitler took his own life to escape the ordeals of trial and conviction.

Destiny, of course, has a hand in it, and maturity is when one realises that life doesn't always balance its book. The killer of one human being is a murderer, few more is a serial killer, and many times more is a mass murderer. But a dictator is someone who has no limits. One estimate has it that the number of people killed or disappeared under Pinochet's watch ranged from 5,000 to 30,000. Hitler is responsible for 20-25 million deaths, Stalin for 20-60 million and Mao Zedong for 40-72 million.

In comparison, Ershad the autocrat was an angel. He is responsible only for a handful of deaths -- students who were crushed under a speeding truck and others cut down by bullets fired by his henchmen. He built many roads, raised many buildings, and composed many poems. He did all of these by appeasing anyone who wanted to oppose him.

Trial or no trial, Hussein Muhammad Ershad is guilty on two counts. He seized the power of this country, less serious of his two offenses. More serious is how he popularised appeasement -- the seedbed of corruption in this country. He is a Teflon man.

Nothing sticks to Teflon. No criticism sticks to Ershad. But the fact remains that he gave us enough rope so that we could hang ourselves.

Mohammad Badrul Ahsan is Editor, First News and a columnist of The Daily Star. E-mail: badrul151@yahoo.com

http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=153338


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] China Starts construction of the first of the five dams on Brahmaputra River



China Starts construction of the first of the five dams on Brahmaputra River

Chinese plan for diversion of water resources, originating from Tibetan plateau, has become a highly contentious International issue between China on one hand and many downstream countries like India, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. China is planning to build or is in the process of building dams, on all major rivers originating from Tibet. This is naturally creating much resentment and heartburn in the riparian downstream countries. The economies of these countries and the lives of their people are principally dependent on the waters flowing in these rivers. Yet, China continues to pay only lip service to this issue by issuing denials and arranging international seminars.China has yet not signed any river water treaty with any of the downstream country.

About 3 years back, media reports appeared for the first time, about possible Chinese plans, to build 5 dams on the river Brahmaputra in Tibet. As per Chinese practice, the Government immediately issued a statement and denied any such intention. Avid China watchers had then warned the Government of India that if Chinese Government is issuing prompt denials, it must be seriously considering the plan. Even a year ago, intention of taking up any such project was flatly denied by Chinese Government. When this matter come up at the time of the visit of Chinese President Hu Jintao to India, Chinese authorities were quick in rejecting the news as a baseless rumour to quell Indian public fears and sentiments. China's Minister for Water Resources, Wang Shucheng, said the proposal was "unnecessary, unfeasible and unscientific, and had no government backing." The China Daily reported, Wang Shucheng even saying that "There is no need for such dramatic and unscientific projects". Later, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said (according to the China Daily) that "The Chinese government has no plans to build a dam on the Yarlung Zangbo River".

In spite of these denials, details started leaking out in the Chinese press about construction of first such dam on Brahmaputra. With high quality satellite imagery now available to Internet users, it is impossible even for a secretive Chinese government to hide such a project from internet users. When latest images of the first dam construction were published on the internet, Chinese government had to accept this fact. The first dam on the Brahmaputra river is coming up at Zangmu (Tibetan name Dzam) having 92.522996 and 29.141999 as longitude and latitude. One of China's biggest engineering and construction companies, China Gezhouba (Group) Corp, has been awarded a contract worth 1.14 billion yuan ($167 million) for a hydropower plant here. Gezhouba's subsidiary, No 5 Engineering Co Ltd, will provide concrete and aggregate processing services for the Zangmu Hydropower project, the company says on its website. The company will be responsible for designing, constructing and running the project that supplies 3.4-million cu m of concrete and 8-million-ton aggregate for the water power station. The project is expected to last until the end of December 2015. Tibet Power Generation Co Ltd of China Huaneng Group, the country's top power generator, would proved finance for the Zangmu Water Power Station. Zangmu Power station will start producing power in 2013. The electricity goes to Lhasa as a high voltage power line is planned for connecting the Lhasa power grid.


The dam is 389.5 m long and 76 m wide at the bottom and 19 m at the top. The flow rate of the river further down streams will be maintained. During normal operations the reservoir will have 86.6 million cubic meters of water.


This is the amount of water flowing on average about every 24 hours down the river. Installed power generating capacity is 510 MW and expected power generating capacity is 2.5 billion kw/h per year. The three villages of Zangmu, Tangmai and Dagu (Chinese names) would be submerged in the water reservoir. The local population would be resettled in part of Giacha and Sangri counties.


The second dam on Brahmaputra is now in planning stage. And would come up at 12 KM downstream from Zangmu dam. The location of the power station is 5 kilometers to the west or upstream of Giacha county seat. The installed power generating capacity is 320 MW and the dam will maintain a water level of 3244 m above sea level. The reservoir will be filled with 28.87 million cubic meters of water. The expected power generating capacity is 1.527 billion kw/h per year.

Concerns of downstream countries on Brahmaputra, i.e. India and Bangladesh seem to have been addressed at present as both of these would be run of the river projects. This means that river water would not be diverted at least at present. However when all the five dams would be completed eventually, one can not say for sure that water from reservoirs would never be diverted. Such an eventuality would turn out to be a major problem for India but would be a calamity or a disaster for Bangladesh.

During 1950, China's People's Liberation Army set out to 'liberate' the roof of the world. The government of India, having inherited past treaties signed by the British with Tibet, were not only shocked at China's unprovoked military action in Tibet, but were also offended by how the Chinese government had disregarded its explicit assurances to India that Tibet would be left alone. The British and US governments had strongly supported the Indian position on Tibet and had offered all possible help to Tibet and India.

Most surprisingly, then Prime minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, suddenly decided then to wash his hands off Tibet and even dissuaded US government from giving military help to Tibet. He offered Tibet to China, on a platter, without any preconditions and failed to extract a price like settling border disputes between India and China and a concrete river water sharing agreements.

This is turning out to be the biggest and the blunder of the century, committed by the Government of Independent India and the repercussions of the same not only would haunt India but also other countries like Bangladesh and Myanmar for many many decades to come.

30 August 2010
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] India's neglected neighbours



India's neglected neighbours

G. PARTHASARATHY

India's neighbours have often complained that New Delhi is so obsessed with Pakistan that it tends to either ignore or miss opportunities to cooperate and expand ties with them.

There are legitimate concerns in Nepal about our diplomats in Kathmandu behaving like proconsuls. Even friends of India express dismay at what they consider crude Indian "meddling" in their internal affairs.

OPPORTUNITY IN BANGLADESH

In Myanmar, we are guilty of delaying, by over 15 years, the development of a 1500 MW hydroelectric project, and of losing access to natural gas owing to inertia over determining how the gas would be transferred to India. The same inertia may work against us in Bangladesh. We could lose a historic opportunity to put our relations with our eastern neighbour on a sound footing.

Showing immense courage, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has moved to get Bangladesh declared a secular Republic. Agreements with India on mutual legal assistance on criminal matters, transfer of sentenced persons, and in combating terrorism, have been signed.

Anti-Indian Islamists from groups like the Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Harkat-ul- Jihad-ul-Islami, apart from separatists like the ULFA's Arabinda Rajkhowa and the NDFB's Ranjan Daimari, have been quietly put behind bars. Pressures in Bangladesh have forced top ULFA leaders to flee to safe havens along the Myanmar-China border.

Sheikh Hasina's visit to Delhi earlier this year produced a road-map for future cooperation. The Finance Minister, Mr Pranab Mukherjee, visited Dhaka on August 7 and inked an agreement to extend a soft loan of $1 billion for 14 projects in Bangladesh.

The Line of Credit will finance projects ranging from railway lines and equipment to the dredging of rivers and the supply of buses. India has also agreed to supply 250MW from its grid to Bangladesh. Our image and credibility will be compromised if the promised electricity is not made available expeditiously.

Bangladesh has, for the first time, agreed to the transit of Indian goods across its territory to the north-east, for the Palatona power project. But, given the opposition to such transit within Bangladesh, India should improve the road network within Bangladesh to Tripura, before it is accused of damaging Bangladesh's roads for transit of its goods.

The Indian bureaucracy has shown little enthusiasm for upgrading border-crossing points in remote areas. This needs to be addressed.

The agreement that India would construct a bridge across the Feni River to facilitate trade would dilute former Prime Minister Begum Khaleda Zia's anti-India rhetoric, as it would promote border trade through her constituency.

After agreeing to a long-pending request from Nepal, Bhutan and Bangladesh to accord transit rights to Chittagong and Mongia ports, India should fulfill its commitment.

India has adopted an overly protectionist attitude in its approach to SAARC neighbours like Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, by placing key items of interest to these neighbours in a "negative list," denying them duty-free access. This is short-sighted, given that we have a trade surplus approaching $3 billion with Bangladesh. It would be statesmanlike if India were to move expeditiously to end restrictions on import of around 61 items of specific interest to Bangladesh. The Commerce Ministry should lift these restrictions before the end of this year.

We need to consider whether we are doing our own economic development any good by allowing inefficient rubber and spices producers in Kerala, or tea planters in the Nilgiris, to undermine a larger vision of regional economic integration.

Sheikh Hasina is facing domestic criticism, spearheaded by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party led by former Prime Minister, Begum Khaleda Zia, and the Jamat-e-Islami, for allegedly having sold out to India. She will have to show that relations with India are producing tangible benefits for Bangladesh.

Under the 1974 Indira-Mujib agreement, India is required to return around 111 enclaves to Bangladesh and in return get 51 enclaves from Bangladesh. It took us 18 years to lease a small corridor of land near Tin Bigha to Bangladesh, which we were required to do under the 1974 agreement. Barely 6.5 kilometres of the 4,096 kilometre land border remains un-demarcated. Measures need to be agreed upon so that the border is expeditiously demarcated.

The "Tin Bigha Corridor' gave access in perpetuity to the Dahagram-Angarpota Enclave. It was agreed during Sheikh Hasina's visit that while Bangladesh would provide electricity to the affected population, India would build a flyover for unfettered Indian use and Bangladesh would use the ground under the flyover for its nationals. India should fulfil this commitment, regarded as a litmus test of Indian sincerity, without any delay.

India has a vital interest in ensuring that Sheikh Hasina succeeds in building a secular and economically vibrant Bangladesh.

PUT PAKISTAN ASIDE

The time has come to realise that a policy of "benign neglect" together with low-key diplomatic engagement is the only realistic way to deal with Pakistan.

Our other neighbours need to be engaged more purposefully through platforms such as the now-dormant Bay of Bengal Multi-sectoral, Technical and Economic Cooperation, since Pakistan appears determined to undermine the entire SAARC effort for economic integration.

A Secretary-level inter-disciplinary team should explore imaginative ways to engage with the other neighbours, with the National Security Adviser and the Prime Minister overseeing its work.

The author is a former High Commissioner to Pakistan


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Re: Human rights situation in Bangladesh



44 women, children become victim of rape in August
 

At least 77 women were killed in various incidents and 44 women and children became victims of rape in August this year, says a report of Bangladesh Society for the Enforcement of Human Rights (BSEHR).

The monthly report, prepared after monitoring various newspapers of Bangladesh, says of the 77 women, about 45 women were killed for dowry and 30 others for family feud and extra martial affairs.

It says 21 women and 23 children became victims of rape. Of them, three children and two women were murdered after the rape, said a BSEHR press release yesterday.

The report says 41 female and 15 male committed suicides during the time for various causes, including family feud.

It says seven people were killed in encounter with law enforcers while seven others were shot dead by Indian Border Security Force.Four domestic helps were killed and four others injured by tortures and three women became victims of fatwa.
http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=153455
 
On 9/2/10, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:
Human rights situation in Bangladesh covering the period of August 2010


Odhikar has been working to defend the civil, political, social, economic and cultural rights of the people and as part of its work, has been observing the human rights situation in Bangladesh. In line with this campaign, an account of the human rights situation in Bangladesh covering the period of August 2010 is given below.

List Of Content : Amar Desh Acting Editor Mahmudur Rahman and journalist Oliullah Noman imprisoned for Contempt of Court;Arrests of Trade Union leader, NGO activists and garment workers;Odhikar rejects the statement of DG, RAB regarding extrajudicial killings;Youth released by RAB after a long detention;Police disperse meetings and human chains;Attack on religious minority communities; Continuation of political violence;

Police baton charge at students of Chittagong University; Verdict of the BDR mutiny case at Sylhet;Violence against women continues

Odhikar has been working to defend the civil, political, social, economic and cultural rights of the people and as part of its work, has been observing the human rights situation in Bangladesh. In line with this campaign, an account of the human rights situation in Bangladesh covering the period of August 2010 is given below.

wordpress.com
Amar Desh Acting Editor Mahmudur Rahman and journalist Oliullah Noman imprisoned for Contempt of Court

1.On August 20, 2010, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court passed a verdict relating to the protection of the image of the Judiciary, sentencing Mahmudur Rahman, Acting Editor of the Daily Amar Desh, to six months in prison and fined him Taka one hundred thousand (USD 1449.27) for Contempt of Court. The Court also sentenced Oliullah Noman, staff reporter of the Daily Amar Desh, to one month imprisonment for preparing the report and fined him Taka ten thousand (USD 144.92). The Court also fined the publisher of the Daily Amar Desh, Hashmat Ali Taka ten thousand (USD 144.92). In case of failure to pay the fine, Mahmudur Rahman will have to serve one more month in jail and Oliullah and Hashmat seven days each. The Appellate Division gave this verdict following a notice of Contempt of Court brought by two lawyers of the Supreme Court for a report published on April 21, 2010 under the headline "Chamber Judge Manei Sarkarer Pokkhe Stay" ('Chamber Bench' means stay order in favour of the Government), where the role of the Attorney General's Office was criticized. Other accused of the case, Abdal Ahmed, Deputy Editor and Mustahid Farooqui, News Editor of the Daily Amar Desh have been acquitted from the case.

2.During the hearing of the case, Mahmudur Rahman defended himself and stated that "Amar Desh had published the truth. The report was published correctly for the sake of the State, Judiciary and for the public interest. If the Court's reputation is wrecked then it was done by the Attorney General's Office that had provided misleading information to the Court. A case should be initiated against them, if any Contempt of Court has been committed." Mahmudur Rahman said, "I feel proud that Amar Desh is playing a role in favour of human rights, rule of law and national interest under my supervision. The fight for truth is costly and I am ready to pay for establishing truth."

3.Mahmudur Rahman was arrested by police from his newspaper office in the early morning of June 2, 2010 after the government cancelled the declaration of the Daily Amar Desh on June 1, 2010. Since then he has been in jail and was allegedly tortured in remand. Meanwhile, on August 25, 2010, Oliullah Noman surrendered himself to the jail authority as per direction of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court.

4.Odhikar believes that a new constitutional and legal history on the role of the Judiciary has been unleashed with this case and the conflict between the inherent power of the Judiciary and freedom of thought, conscience and expression has been highlighted in this verdict. "Truth is no defence" has also been sharply placed against the freedom of speech and expression. While the human rights consequences in this matter are clear, it will also carry political overtones, the consequence of which is yet uncertain.

5.Odhikar also believes that the Court will take a positive initiative to resolve the conflict between the Court and freedom of thought and conscience and of speech guaranteed by the Constitution and will review this judgment.

Freedom of media

6.In the month of August 2010, several journalists became victims of abuse and assault. During this period, 01 journalist was killed, 02 journalists were injured, 04 threatened and 02 journalists were attacked and cases were filed against 03 journalists.

Arrests of Trade Union leader, NGO activists and garment workers

7.On July 29, 2010, the Minimum Wage Board declared Taka 3,000.00 (USD 43.47) per month as the minimum wage for garments workers. However, the garments workers have been demanding Taka 5,000.00 (USD 72.46) per month to be declared as the minimum wage.

8.The garments workers refused the minimum wage of Taka 3,000.00 (USD 43.47) and made a public protest with their demand that Taka 5,000.00 (USD 72.46) minimum wage be effective from August. On July 30, 2010, several thousand garments workers staged a protest against the decision of the Minimum Wage Board and protested angrily in the Tejgaon, Mohakhali and Gulshan areas of Dhaka city. Due to the same reason, agitated garment workers in Fatullah, under Narayanganj district, blocked the Dhaka-Narayanganj link road and the workers in Ashulia area also blocked the Dhaka-Tangail highway on July 31, 2010 and similarly brought out an angry protest. Police charged on the agitated workers with batons. At least 50 people including 2 policemen were injured in Narayanganj while more than 200 workers including police and journalists were injured in Ashulia during the clash between the garments workers and police.

9.On August 1 and 2, 2010, garments workers at Fatulla and Sonargaon, under Narayanganj district; Ashulia in Savar of the Dhaka district; and Kaliakoir under Gazipur district blocked roads and staged protests.

10.Two separate cases were filed in Fatulla and Ashuliya Police Stations accusing four thousand garments workers in this connection. In Fatulla Model Police Station, police filed a case mentioning the names of 46 workers along with three thousand unknown people while in Kaliakoir Police Station 500 unknown workers have been accused in the case. Due to workers unrest, that allegedly caused vandalization of properties, police arrested 61 garments workers including worker's leader Montu Ghosh and Hazi Md. Shahidul Islam; and Kalpona Akhter and Babul Akhter, executives of two NGOs, which deal with ready-made garments workers. Montu Ghosh was arrested on July 31, 2010 and was shown arrested in five cases since August 3, 2010. He was taken into 9-day remand for interrogation. Furthermore, another leader Moshrefa Mishu alleged that police have been calling her on her cell phone and threatening to kill her in 'crossfire'.

11.Meanwhile, on August 22, 2010, about two thousand workers of Sikdar Apparels Factory at Moikuli area of Rupganj under Narayanganj district, blocked the Dhaka-Sylhet highway for three hours to demand over 3 months of overdue wages. Police opened fire and threw tear-gas shells at them. At least 30 people were injured, including 8 policemen, due to a clash between police and workers. Of them, four were found to have been shot.

12.The workers have been demanding the increase of their minimum wages up to Taka 5,000.00 (USD 72.46) and Odhikar believes that their demands are reasonable, given the cost of living expenses they have to bear. The minimum wage of Taka 5,000.00 (USD 72.46) should be given.

13.Odhikar demands the immediate release of the trade union leaders, NGO activists and general workers.

14.Odhikar urges the Government to take effective steps for keeping this prospering industry active through positive and constructive discussion.

15.During the month of August 2010, 402 have been injured and 60 were arrested while demonstrating the demand for overdue wages and an increase to their wages at the ready-made garments factories.

Odhikar rejects the statement of DG, RAB regarding extrajudicial killings

16.On August 8, 2010 the Director General of the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), Hassan Mahmood Khandker, in a meeting with journalists on RAB's activities in order to protect law and order, said, "There is nothing called 'extrajudicial killing'. If anything happens out of the purview of law that is called extrajudicial. Nothing has happened so far in this manner. If any incident of death occurs within a legal framework in order to protect public security, RAB is not responsible for that incident. Incidents of gun-fight take place when the RAB members try to prevent the attackers. These are not extrajudicial killings at all."

17.Odhikar rejects the statement of the Director General of the Rapid Action Battalion regarding extrajudicial killings. Odhikar is alarmed by the statement because of the clear indication that the Government is taking a completely opposite position in contrast to the commitment it made before the international community and human rights defenders to ensure human rights and completely halt all extra-judicial killings.

18.The Director General's statement amounts to saying that the killings are not 'extrajudicial', since they took place within the 'legal framework' of RAB. This statement literally undermines the role of the judiciary and by passes the necessity of independent investigation of each and every incident of extrajudicial killing. It also raises serious debate about the so called 'legal framework' within which RAB can kill a person, including persons who are already in their custody, without any judicial process and trial.

19.On August 30, 2010, the Director General of RAB Hassan Mahmood Khandker was promoted to Inspector General of Police and Mukhlesur Rahman, Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of Police, Rajshahi range has been made the new DG of RAB.

20.During the month of August 2010, 08 people have been killed extra judicially. It has been further alleged that of these people, 06 were killed by RAB, 01 was killed by Police and 01 was killed by BDR.

Crossfire/Encounter/Gun fight:

21.It has been alleged that of the extrajudicial killings, 05 were killed in 'crossfire/encounters/gun fights'. It has been alleged further that all 05 of these persons were victims of 'crossfire/encounter/gun fights' by RAB.

Death caused by torture:

22.In this month, a total of 02 persons were allegedly tortured to death. 01 was allegedly tortured to death by the RAB and another by BDR.

Identities of the deceased:

23. Of the 08 deceased, it has been reported that 03 were members of Purbo Banglar Communist Party (Red Flag), 01 was a farmer and 04 were alleged criminals.

Death in jail / police custody

24. In August 2010, 05 persons reportedly died in jail custody due to illness. In a separate incident Aminul Islam Khalek who was in the custody of police on August 29 in Narayanpur Investigation Cell under Jalmalpur district, allegedly became 'sick' on the same day, was transferred to the Mymensingh Medical College Hospital where he died on August 30th.

Youth released by RAB after a long detention

25. On April 27, 2010, bodies of three youths were recovered from the bank of the Turag river near Chandrima Real Estate at Mohammadpur area of Dhaka city. The bodies had been identified. Among the three, one Forkan, son of Nurul Islam,residing at Saudpur village in Rajapur Upazila under Jhalkathi district, regained consciousness. A private television channel 'Ekushe TV' transmitted news on August 12 and 13, 2010 in this regard. Forkan informed journalists that he was detained in RAB-1 custody. He said that a group of RAB members in civilian dress took him to the RAB-1 office at Uttara in mid April 2010. He was kept in a dark place in blindfolds all time and was beaten up regularly. He was also informed that he would be released by paying a huge sum of money to RAB officials. He was counting days in the detention centre by putting marks on the wall. Later, RAB decided to release him for unknown reasons. He was put in a vehicle in blindfolds. After driving a long way, he was thrown out beside the road.

26. A recent trend of human rights violations in Bangladesh is men claiming to be members of law enforcement agencies, making arrests. There are allegations of several incidents of enforced disappearances that took place after arrests by law enforcement agencies. Sometimes the dead bodies of the arrestees are found after few days. The families of the victims claim that members of the law enforcement agencies are making these arrests. RAB has been refuting these allegations from the beginning. Nevertheless, many questions have arisen regarding arrests made by RAB and extrajudicial killings after Forkan's statement.

27. Odhikar believes that such incidents occur due to lack of transparency and impunity of law enforcement agencies.

28. Odhikar urges the government to immediately identify those involved with these incidents and bring them to justice.

Police disperse meetings and human chains

29. On August 6, 2010, police stopped a meeting organised by Sacheton Nagorik Committee (Conscious Citizens Committee) in Gazipur. Human rights defenders of Odhikar at Gazipur district reported that police obstructed the meeting presided by Sacheton Nagorik Committee convener Advocate Monjur Morshed Prince, when it commenced at an open space in the town to protest against constant load shedding (power cuts) and to demand increased supply of electricity. Advocate Monjur Morshed Prince informed Odhikar that the Committee had announced this meeting through megaphones for the three days in the town. They took permission from the Municipal authority to organise the meeting as per rule. Police stopped the meeting on the pretext of having no approval from the District Special Branch of Police.

30. On August 8, 2010, police imposed a barrier at a human chain prepared by local journalists of Barisal city to demand the releasing a Mahmudur Rahman, Acting Editor of the Daily Amar Desh. Readers of Amar Desh and local journalists of Barisal division organised the human chain and a meeting at Awshini Kumar Town Hall in the city. Though the organiser informed police about their programme, later the police ordered the ban on the programme before it started.

31. Odhikar expresses its concern regarding police restriction on peaceful meetings and human chains and demands that the democratic space should not be further narrowed.

32. Odhikar believes that any citizen of the State has the right to organise and take part in meetings and assemblies in a peaceful manner as guaranteed in Articles 38 and 39 of the Constitution.

Attack on religious minority communities

33. On August 7, 2010, a group of criminals attacked a group of people who were constructing a mosque for the Ahmadiayya Jamaat at Chantara village in Ghatail Upazila under Tangail district. The attackers also ransacked several houses and two poultry farms belonging to the Ahmadiyya Jamaat. At least 10 persons belonging to the Ahmadiyya community were injured in this attack. Injured persons were shifted to Tangail and Dhaka for treatment. Police did not arrest any one in this regard. It is to be mentioned that the criminals attacked and vandalized an under construction mosque at the same place on June 17, 2010.

34. On August 11, 2010, a group of criminals led by 77 No. Ward Awami League leader of Dhaka City Hazi Islam and Sutrapur Thana Awami League President Abul Hossain, attacked a Hindu temple 'Shree Shree Radhakanto Thakurani Lokkhi Janordhon Chokro Jiobigroho' at Lalmohon Saha Street, Sutrapur in Dhaka. The criminals attacked with pistols, hockey sticks, and daggers and ransacked the doors and windows and allegedly vandalised 5 idols of gods and goddesses at the temple. Justice (Retired) Gouragopal Saha and Molchanda Ghosh, President and Secretary of Mondir Committee (Temple Committee) respectively alleged that local Awami League leaders are involved in vandalizing temples by using their armed cadres and are trying to occupy the temple's property. Many people are in hiding due to the fear of the criminals.

35. Odhikar demands that the Government should take immediate action against perpetrators. Odhikar also urges the government to ensure security of the religious minority communities.

Continuation of political violence

36. On August 7, 2010 two factions of the Awami League-backed Chattra League in Rajshahi University were involved in a clash over establishing supremacy in the university campus. One group was led by Chattra League President Awal Kabir and the other was led by its General Secretary Majedul Islam. Four people were injured in the clash, of which one was shot.

37. On August 10, 2010, one person died and 30 were injured in a clash between the supporters of Nasir Khan, former President of Shailkupa Upazila Jubo League and Panna Khan, former Chairman of Digonghar Union Parishad, who recently joined the Awami League. The altercation took place at Achintapur village in Shailkupa upazila under Jhenaidha district over the upcoming Union Parishad election and also over holding supremacy in the locality, which took life of one Rozdar Ali (30).

38. On August 14, 2010, a BNP activist named Hamid (40) was killed by some unidentified criminals who cut his leg tendons at Sharsha upazila under Jessore district. The deceased's elder brother Khaleque filed a case in this regard accusing 16 persons. Police arrested Zahir Molla, one of the accused in this connection. Sheikh Afiluddin, local Parliament Member who belongs to Awami League, called on Md. Enamul Huq, Officer-in-Charge (OC) of Sharsha Police Station on August 15, 2010 at his office. The OC Md. Enamul Huq was attacked by the MP and his party workers when he went there. OC Md. Enamul Huq informed journalists that the Member of Parliament slapped him when he entered the MP's room. MP Sheikh Afiluddin told him, "Did people vote for your father to become the peoples' representative? Why did you lodge the case without my permission? How dare you?" Later he was beaten up by one Musa, a listed criminal of Sharsha Police Station, who was present there. He was also verbally abused by them. MP Sheikh Afiluddin gave him an ultimatum to leave the area within 24 hours.

39. According to information gathered by Odhikar, 12 persons have been killed and 800 injured in political violence in August 2010. There were also 77 incidents of internal violence in the Awami League and 07 within the BNP. In addition to this, 02 people were killed in Awami Leagues internal conflict while 356 were injured. 01 person was killed and 72 persons were injured in BNP initiated violence.

Police baton charged at students of Chittagong University

40. On August 2, 2010, students of the Chittagong University sparked off an agitation in the campus against increased tuition fees. An altercation took place between the students and police while students were demanding withdrawal of the decision at a protest rally. The police threw tear gas shells, fired rubber bullets and also charged with batons at agitated students, which left 56 people injured including some police. Police arrested 241 students from the university campus.

41. Odhikar condemns the incident of police attack on the students of the Chittagong University. Odhikar demands the release of arrested students and withdrawal of increased tuition fees in order to ensure a pro-people education system.

Verdict of the BDR mutiny case at Sylhet

42. Verdict of the BDR mutiny case at Sylhet was declared on August 2, 2010. The special BDR Court-3 declared the verdict of the BDR mutiny case accusing 14 BDR jawans of the 8th Rifles Battalion stationed at Sunamganj who have been sentenced to different terms of imprisonment. Nayek Subedar Signalman Md. Abul Hossain has been awarded the maximum penalty of 6 years of rigorous imprisonment while Sepoy Suman Marma and Md. Toriqul Islam have been awarded a minimum 4 months of imprisonment. Major General Rafiqul Islam, Director General of the BDR gave the verdict at the special BDR Court-3 set up in Sylhet BDR Headquarters.

43. During the trial one of the accused said, "We spent 1 year and 2 months in jail. We were unable to produce any witnesses due to our detention in jail. We did not get any assistance for this reason." Md. Abdul Alim, younger brother of convicted BDR jawan Abdul Wahid told Odhikar that many people were involved in the mutiny. Those who were prime actors in this incident, have been protected. Many of the convicted persons are victims of conspiracy. "My brother did not get proper justice."

44. The local human rights defenders of Odhikar monitored the trial process.

Trial at Pilkhana BDR Headquarters continues

45. On August 11, 2010 the trial of Pilkhana BDR mutiny case continued at the Special Court 6 set up in the BDR Headquarters. The allegations brought against 448 BDR jawans were presented before the Court. The Tribunal set October 24, 2010 as the date for charge-framing against 337 BDR members of the Unit Offices and October 25, 2010 for 111 BDR members of the Record Wing of the BDR Headquarters. The BDR Director General Major General Rafiqul Islam presided over the Court.

Bangladesh-India border

46. As per Odhikar documentation, during the month of August 2010, there have been several incidents of human rights violations at the border areas by the Indian Border Security Forces (BSF). During this time, 04 Bangladeshi were killed, among them 03 Bangladeshi civilians were reportedly shot dead and 01 person was tortured to death, 08 were injured by BSF among them 06 were tortured and 02 were bullet shot by BSF. During this time 02 persons were abducted by BSF.

Violence against women continues

Housewife killed for conceiving girl child

47. On August 3, 2010, a housewife named Taslima (28) was allegedly killed by her in-laws due to conceiving a girl child. This inhuman incident took place at Jatrabari area in Dhaka city. Family members of the deceased alleged that Taslima was 8 months pregnant. Taslima's husband Md. Sohel and his family members killed Taslima by imposing cruel treatment upon her after being informed of a girl child through an ultra sonogram test. Furthermore, she was treated inhumanly from time to time due to dowry demands.

Rape

48. In the month of August 2010, it has been reported that 42 women and girls were raped of which 22 were adults and 20 were children . Of the 22 female adults raped, 05 were killed after being raped and 05 were gang raped. Of the 20 girls who were raped, 02 were killed after being killed and 02 were subjected to gang rape.

Dowry related violence

49. During August 2010, 49 women 03 children were subjected to dowry related violence. It has been alleged that of these 49 women, 32 women and 02 children were killed due to dowry related issues and 11 were treated inhumanly. During this span of time, 07 women allegedly committed suicide after failing to cope with dowry related mistreatment and violence.

Acid violence

50. In the month of August 2010, 15 persons were victims of acid violence. Of these, 08 were women and 03 were men, 02 girls and 02 boys.

Recommendations

51. Freedom of thought, conscience and of speech guaranteed by the Constitution must be ensured by releasing Amar Desh Acting Editor Mahmudur Rahman and its journalist Oliullah Noman.

52. The minimum wage of Taka 5,000.00 (USD 72.46) and other benefits of the garments workers must be implemented in order to ensure their rights to food, shelter, employment and health. The arrested trade union leaders, NGO activists and garments workers should be released immediately.

53. An independent Commission regarding extrajudicial killings should be formed and perpetrators of all extrajudicial killings must be brought before justice through proper investigation.

54. The State must restore the fundamental rights of religious minorities and provide physical protection to those who have been abused, along with providing security to their property.

55. The government should refrain from shrinking the space for practice of democracy and also abstain from repression to opponent political activists, which will only provoke resentment.

56. The Government should be responsive in order to stop political violence. It must take effective actions against those involved in violence, irrespective of political beliefs. The law enforcement agencies need to be proactive to stop violence.

57. The trial of the BDR Jawans in the mutiny cases must be made transparent and accountable.

58. Torture in remand and other forms of custodial torture must be stopped. The Government must respect its commitment of 'zero tolerance' for extrajudicial killings, custodial deaths and torture. The Government should also provide a clear statement about those who have been kidnapped by members claiming to be of law enforcement agencies and the secret killings that follow such kidnappings.

59.The Bangladesh Government must take immediate and effective steps to bring an end to the injuring and killing of Bangladeshi citizens by the Indian Border Security Force.

Tel: 88-02-9888587, Fax: 88-02-9886208
Email:
odhikar@sparkbd.net, odhikar.bd@gmail.com Web: www.odhikar.org

Notes:

1.Odhikar seeks to uphold the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of the people.

2.Odhikar documents and records violations of human rights and receives information from its network of human rights defenders and monitors media reports in twelve national daily newspapers.

3.Odhikar conducts detailed fact-finding investigations into some of the most significant violations.

4.Odhikar is consistent in its human rights reporting and is committed to remain so.

Director
Odhikar
Bangladesh.
Tel: 88-02-9888587, Fax : 88-02-9886208
E-mail:
odhikar@citech-bd.com
odhikar.bd@gmail.com
odhikar@sparkbd.net
Website: www.odhikar.org
 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] FW: Burqa can't be forced: High Court






From: farida_majid@hotmail.com
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] Burqa can't be forced: High Court
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:05:49 -0400

            Many people think that secularism is a gray (as opposed to the 'black' of the burqa) burlap sack that you can whack over a person's head.
 
           A black burqa is a very good thing for Muslims, they say. 
          It can put a ink-blot over the person's existence and obliterate the person's humanity. That is supposedly a very Islamic thing to do,
          though there is no Qur'anic injunction or dress-code for the purpose of blotting out the humanity of a person.
 
             This gray burlap sack called secularism, they say, is an evil thing that can be 'imposed' and can make you look like
             the devil incarnate otherwise known as Hindu. This sack is rumored to be outfitted with a devilish mechanism
             that can make the whole religion of Islam disappear from the realm in a twinkle of an eye!
 
             They also say that this devil incarnate Hindu should be eliminated from the land by any means. The means
             may take the form of mass murder but if that is what it takes to do the job there should not be any hesitation .  
             Anybody showing tendencies like a Hindu should be eliminated. This Hindu Hasina should take heed. Her father was wiped out.

              "Did not hindu hasina learned anything from her Father"? wondered one of the angry respondents to the news of
               burqa's non-enforcement.

Did not hindu hasina learned anything from her Father?

              However, the people who speak in the above language have not been able to provide a sample of the grey burlap sack
               called secularism that can be 'imposed' over people's head and that can make Islam disappear in a twinkle of an eye.
 
              Until they do, we have the Holy Qur'an to turn to for guidance, solace and fortitude. In this holy month of Ramadan,
               time for penance and self-purification, we should recognize that the above talk is itself a kind of 'covering' or clothing
              or 'lebas'.  And the Qur'an warns us to be wary of these attempts at falsehoods:
 
               "Wa la talbisu al Huqqa bi-l batili wa taktumoo ul Huqqa wa antum taAlamuna"  2:42.
               (And cover not Truth with falsehood, nor coceal the Truth when ye know whar it is)
             
              For those who want be sure that there is no Qur'anic mandate for women to wear the burqa or the hijab,
              please read the following article which was published in the Daily Star, and then archived by the Islamic
              Reasearch Foundation Information. It is the only article by a Bangladeshi scholar in IRFI.
 
  • Farida Majid As the hijab issue heats up in France and Germany, and the psychological pressure and the brainwashing of women intensifies all over the Muslim world, the feverish ...
    irfi.org/articles/articles_201_250/fashioning_lies.htm · Cached page

     

To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: qrahman@netscape.net
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:38:27 -0400
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Burqa can't be forced: High Court

 
I think burqa should not be forced but the new law does not have some "Common sense" exceptions. For Islamic institutions "Islamic" dress should be enforced (That may include Burqa if the local community feels right about it). Albeit there are difference of opinion among scholars if Burqa is mandatory in Islam or not. Most scholars think "Hijab" covers Islamic requirements for women.

While I agree Burqa should not be forced but secularism should not be forced on our people either. Maybe  experts should be looking into the verdict more to ensure some "Activist" judges going overboard or not. There are some concerns from liberal groups about civil rights in another ruling regarding Shaheed minar.

Personally I feel that, God created us as "FREE" men and women and gave us freedom to obey or disobey Him. Therefore, we should encourage honest and open discussions/debates about religion. Blaming everything Islamic TODAY for what some Jamaat-e-Islami leaders did 40 years ago does not seem fair or logical to me.

Peace.



-----Original Message-----
From: Mo Assghar <moassghar@yahoo.com>
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 24, 2010 9:02 am
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Burqa can't be forced: High Court

 
But Secularism can be forced? Give me a break!!

Did not hindu hasina learned anything from her Father?


--- On Mon, 8/23/10, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com>
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Burqa can't be forced: High Court
To:
Date: Monday, August 23, 2010, 2:36 AM

 
Burqa can't be forced: High Court

 
The court also ordered relevant officials to explain why forcing girls to wear burqa (veil) and keeping them out of sports and cultural activities were illegal.


Dhaka, Aug 22 (bdnews24.com)—The High Court has ruled that no women can be forced to wear burqa at work and educational institutions. In it's ruling The High Court on Sunday in a suo moto order directed the government to ensure that no women were forced to wear veil or religious dress in the educational institutions and offices.

The court also ordered the government to ensure that the cultural activities and sports in the educational institutions are not restricted.The orders came in the wake of a public interest petition filed by Supreme Court lawyers Mahbub Shafi and A K M Hafizul Alam on Sunday. The bench of justices A H M Shamsuddin Chowdhury and Sheikh Mohammad Zakir Hossain also ruled that they cannot be barred from taking to culture and sports

The court also ordered relevant officials to explain why forcing girls to wear burqa (veil) and keeping them out of sports and cultural activities were illegal.

The A Bengali daily news item said that principal of the college in Natore ( Northern Bangladesh ) has stopped any cultural activities and sports at the college and forced female students to wear Borka or veil in the college.The HC also directed principal of the college Mozammel Haque to appear before the HC bench on August 26 to explain the matter.

It also issued a rule upon the government to explain why imposition of restriction on cultural activities and sports in the educational institutions and offices and forcing the female students to wear veil should not be declared illegal.

Secretaries to the ministries of home, education, social welfare and women affair and principal Mozammel Haque has been made respondent to the rule and orderThe education, home, social welfare, and women and children affairs secretaries and principal of Rani Bhabani Mohila College Mozammel Huq were asked to reply to ruling. Following a brief hearing, the court also asked the principal to appear before it on Aug 26.

The lawyers in their petition on Sunday cited a report carried by a Bengali newspaper the same day headlined, 'Burqa mandatory at Rani Bhabani Mohila College'. The lawyers stated such enforcement was discriminatory.





__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Who cares about Pakistan?

According to a few days old statement of Prime Minister of Pakistan the Flood Aid Donation Pledges have topped $ 1 billion or 1/14th of her one year's Foreign Exchange Earnings. Definitely very sluggish. The Biggest Beggar of the world, Pakistan should have received $ 1 Trillion, right?

--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Isha Khan <bdmailer@...> wrote:
>
> Who cares about Pakistan?By Jude Sheerin BBC News
>
> Donations have been sluggish to the Pakistan floods appeals, as they were
> back in 2005 when the part of Kashmir the country administers was torn apart
> by an earthquake. The BBC News website asked some experts to comment on
> possible reasons why.
> Donor fatigue
>
> Dr Marie Lall, Pakistan expert at the Royal Institute of International
> Affairs (Chatham House) and senior lecturer at the Institute of Education,
> says: "I think there is donor fatigue all around. The [2004] Indian Ocean
> tsunami, the Burmese Cyclone [Nargis, 2008], the [2005] Pakistan earthquake,
> and [this year's] Haiti earthquake. It is getting too much; we are in a
> recession and people are short of money."
> [image: Camps at a displaced person's camp in Pakistan] Is there a limit to
> our emotional response to images of suffering?
>
> Rebecca Wynn, Pakistan specialist for UK-based aid agency Oxfam, says: "Many
> donors have made substantial contributions in humanitarian assistance to
> Pakistan over the years, particularly in response to the conflict-related
> displacements over the last two years. Of course, the fact that the people
> of Pakistan have been hit time and again by disaster is even more reason to
> give."
>
> Dr Elizabeth Ferris, senior fellow at the US-based Brookings Institution, a
> foreign policy think tank, says: "It should also be noted that the
> international humanitarian system isn't set up to deal with more than one
> major crisis a year. USAID, for example, committed one-third of its annual
> budget to the Haitian earthquake response. And among the general public
> there may be a feeling of, 'Well, I donated to the victims of the Haitian
> earthquake and Haiti is a far needier country than Pakistan.'"
> Corruption
>
> Yale University economics professor Dean Karlan, an expert on charitable
> giving, says: "Corruption concerns may explain why giving is lower to
> developing countries than many would like it to be, but it does not explain
> why there is less money pouring into Pakistan now than does to disaster
> relief causes in other developing countries with similar governance issues."
>
> Dr Marie Lall says: "People in Pakistan are sceptical the government will be
> transparent. But they are giving to philanthropic organisations. In the UK,
> I think people are sceptical of [non-governmental organisations'] overheads
> and costs. They don't know which ones are transparent and reliable, even
> though local organisations such as TCF [The Citizens' Foundation] are doing
> an incredible job."
>
> Dr Elizabeth Ferris says: "People are always sceptical about their money
> reaching flood victims, particularly in countries with reputations for
> corruption. But Haiti didn't have a very good reputation in this regard.
> [Pakistan] President [Asif Ali] Zardari trip to Europe [during the floods]
> was not a good move. For a few days, that was the 'story' of the Pakistani
> floods, which doesn't inspire people to be generous, particularly in this
> economic climate."
> Terrorism
>
> Dr Marie Lall says: "British Prime Minister David Cameron's comments in
> India [when he said Islamabad promoted the export of terror] did not help."
>
> Dr Elizabeth Ferris says: "People are less likely to donate to any country
> seen as a haven for terrorism. And more generally, the fact that so much
> Western news coverage in recent years about Pakistan has been negative,
> stressing its links with the conflict in Afghanistan. I think this is the
> major reason for the slow public response - the image of Pakistan in our
> media. There may also be a feeling, particularly in the US, that Islamic
> governments and charities should be stepping up to the plate to donate."
> Timing
>
> Rebecca Wynn says: "This disaster has come at a bad time, following the
> financial crisis and the Haiti earthquake. Many donors made huge commitments
> to Haiti, so may find it hard to fund another major disaster, particularly
> in the same year."
>
> Dr Marie Lall says: "Timing may be a factor, but I think it's more to do
> with not realising the scale of the disaster, and the attitude by the
> British government; the UK should be leading the aid effort, given the
> Pakistani diaspora here and the fact that we need Pakistan for the war in
> Afghanistan."
> 'Wrong' disaster
>
> Professor Dean Karlan says: "Sudden events seem to generate more funds. A
> flood (and droughts) happen gradually and build. There isn't any one single
> day in which news is huge. For the same reason, this pushes the story away
> from the media spotlight. But massive and sudden earthquakes or tsunamis
> draw our immediate attention and shock us."
>
> Dr Elizabeth Ferris says: "It's important to note that in general people are
> likely to give more to emergencies occurring in countries geographically
> closer to them - although this didn't hold true for the tsunami. But when
> you trace contributions over time, you find that Americans and Canadians are
> more likely to respond to disasters in the Western hemisphere while
> Europeans tend to be more responsive to African countries (and their former
> colonies, in particular)."
>
> Dr Marie Lall says: "This was not one cataclysmic event, but one which grew
> over three weeks. The fact that 25% of the country was or is under water is
> not understood. The low numbers of dead, relatively speaking, mask the
> disaster on the ground. The crisis has destroyed crops, dead livestock and
> damaged homes and infrastructure. Food prices are through the roof and there
> won't be a normal harvest. It will get worse. Farmers will starve."
>
> *BBC website readers have been sending in their views. Here are some of
> their comments.*
>
> A lot of people I know feel that some of the very wealthy Muslim countries
> (Saudi Arabia etc) should step in and help those who are their religious
> brethren rather than always expecting the currently cash strapped countries
> who always give to keep on giving. Donor fatigue of some type but more that
> we are fatigued with always being the ones expected to help. Also
> celebrities such as Bono and Bob Geldof are always banging on about how we
> should give our money when if they each gave 50% of their money, a lot of
> help could be given. *Fleur, Devon, UK*
>
> I believe donations from the West will perk up when we read that it has been
> confirmed that Muslim nations such as Saudi Arabia have donated sizeable
> sums. I read this morning that India, traditionally Pakistan's 'enemy' , has
> offered help, but no news of similar offers of help from Muslim countries. *C
> Burns, Longfield, UK*
>
> I don't think it's necessary to donate any money to Pakistan because there's
> enough money - and support - available within the Islamic community
> (particularly from the oil-rich Gulf states and Saudi Arabia). The Saudis
> spend millions of petro-dollars every year to help get mosques built all
> over the world. I'm sure the Saudis alone could fund the whole recovery of
> their Islamic compatriots in Pakistan, particularly as they employ so many
> guest workers from Pakistan. However, I'm pleased to see that the Pakistan
> government have accepted aid from India. I am supporting the Haitian appeal
> - these desperate people don't have the support of wealthy Islamic
> countries. *Rupert Templeman, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK*
>
> Pakistan has a long history of corruption and military rule. People of
> Pakistan have been suffring in general from a lack of basic necessities.
> After 65 years of independence it is still under developed due to bad
> management. The most likely reason for the slow response for help, I
> believe, is due to its links to terrorism. *Bhupendra Shah, North Bergen New
> Jersey, USA*
>
> **
>
> There are many good explanations as to why aid has been slow to trickle into
> Pakistan given the sheer extent of the disaster. However, next to Israel,
> Pakistan has probably the worst international image around right now.
> Pakistan is unfortunately associated with Afghanistan, Bin Laden and Mullah
> Omar. Another important dynamic not quite appreciated is that there is a
> significant Pakistan-rooted diaspora worldwide in many Western countries and
> richer Arab Gulf countries. After 9/11 there has been significant tension
> and unease between the Pakistan-based communities and the host countries,
> due to the perceived 'homegrown' terror threat. Therefore, in the West, I
> think the dynamic of negative views towards Pakistanis amongst their
> communities rather than just a negative view of the nation is at play. *Raja
> Mohammed, Surrey, UK*
>
> Donations have been sluggish I think because Pakistan spends billions on its
> military and yet cries out for help because of a natural disaster. Their
> government needs to sort its priorities out. *Yvette, Kent, UK*
>
> This is a civilised country with nuclear power and missiles. A monsoon
> season comes every year. It's no volcano, no earthquake, and not a one-off
> natural disaster. *Chris Jeffery, Odessa, Ukraine*
>
> If they can afford to be a nuclear country and boast about it, then they
> should be able to look after their own people. *Ohanes, UK*
>
> Apart from various reasons given, there is the perception that historically
> the Pakistani government and politicians have deliberately misdirected aid
> for humanitarian causes to other channels like in military projects.
> Obviously people and foreign governments somehow lack trust in Pakistan. *Satya
> S Issar, Wraysbury, Staines, UK*
>
> I think the fact that Pakistan has spent great sums on nuclear weapons aimed
> at India instead of preparing for catastrophic monsoons is one part of the
> explanation why donations are so low. The rest of the world has run out of
> sympathy for Pakistan.* Fredrik Andersson, Gothenburg, Sweden*
>
> **
>
> These "experts" are so far from the mark it's hard to believe. Countries
> like India and Pakistan are not poor - any country that can fund a nuclear
> program and have the massive armed forces they have, should be able to look
> after themselves. Plus there's the ex-pat factor - there's a large community
> in the UK who think of themselves as Pakistanis first and they will be
> giving through other ways and means. *Tony, Leeds, UK*
>
> It is very interesting to see how much fellow Muslim countries are giving in
> aid, if anything at all. The mega rich Arab oil states have given very
> little, apart from Saudi Arabia who has donated $40 million or so - which is
> not a lot considering how wealthy they are. *A J Wawn, Bedford, UK*
>
> Any country that sends its top politician on a jolly around Europe and
> insists on wasting money on nuclear weapons in my opinion has money enough
> to look after its own. *James, Cheshire, UK*
>
> Lack of media coverage and lack of heart-wrenching stories. It's all very
> much 'another day in Pakistan'. It needs/needed to be the first and main
> news story on every news channel, with numbers for people to understand the
> scale - e.g.,number of cattle or other animals dead, as a proportion of the
> number needed by the country. Satellite images detailing the flooding
> perhaps. The news story currently lacks 'drama'. I give regularly to
> charities and causes such as this but even I didn't fully appreciate the
> scale until this week. *Loz, UK*
>
> When the Pakistani government chooses to spend their revenue funding nuclear
> weapons and maintaining the sixth largest armed forces in the world they
> have no right to plead poverty when the monsoon is heavier than normal.
> Haiti were already one of the poorest countries in the world when an
> unforeseeable earthquake hit them - they deserve charitable giving. It is
> hard to feel the same way about Pakistan. *Dave Fulton, Seaham, UK*
>
> The 'elephant in the room' is that Pakistan is not a 'popular' country,
> because of its negative associations with terrorism. People may also feel
> negatively towards poor, developing countries which spend billions on arms,
> including nuclear weapons. *C Matthews, Birmingham, UK*
> While acknowledging the floods exist, the problem is that there are simply
> too many people living in a flood plain. They chose to live there. The good
> times were good. This is a bad time. We should make provision in the good
> times (for the bad will always come - nature's like that). If there were
> fewer people, there would be more food to go round, more space on higher
> ground, and the aid agencies would have an easier task. It's a basic
> problem. Haiti was similar. *C A Turner, Salisbury, UK*
> **
> *http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11035270*
>


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/