if Soviet Russia didn't attack Afganistan in 80s who would have fought against the aggressor?
if Bush's regime didn't attack Iraq in 2003 who would have fought against the aggressor?
if India didn't attack then east-pakistan in 1970 who would have fought against the aggressor?
let me put hypothetically, would you fight against an aggressor if Hasina's regime needed be overthrown by millitary means in the name of "New bangladeshi freedom"?
If your answer is no, then u r a coward. And if your answer is yes, then u r a rajakar.
--- In
khabor@yahoogroups. com, Mizanur Bhuiyan <bhuiyanmr@. ..> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Razakars should be top of the search list. First thing, they should prosecute for being disagreeing with the concept of Bangladesh as an independent country but still they are conducting their political activities without any hesitation. Secondly, they should have punished for looting, arching, raping and murdering innocent public. Third reason, they should thrown to the trial taking advantage and creating division in between pro-liberation parties but keeping their own out of touch. We hope present Government did not keep any hole in their fishing net in which they could pass through. These war criminals should be punished, no matter what. I can guarantee, if this issue is settled then Bangladesh will walk to be a global star.
>
>
> Thanks,regards Mizanur Bhuiyan
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> Rediscover Hotmail®: Get e-mail storage that grows with you.
>
http://windowslive. com/RediscoverHo tmail?ocid= TXT_TAGLM_ WL_HM_Rediscover _Storage1_ 042009>