Hello Hello Hello Dipu Moni
If ershad the great lompot n luichcha was illegal as president than your netri Hasi apu was illegal as Leader of the opposition(like asm rob the "the ghreeho palito poshu).
It is klnown to the people of Bangladesh that your netri had a night ride with the luichcha n decided to stab the people's aspiration to hoot out the illegal bastard ershaidda from the face of politics in 1986 by joining the illegal of 'Soirachar"(now turned adorer bhrata) election game to give legitimacy to ershaidda.
People are wondering that how much the awamis are treacherous in their act against the blood of the Martyrs which cannot be matched throughout ther world.
It has been reported that our FM is married toi a pakistani(who killed 3 million people n raped two lac women) n her netris daughter is married to proven murderer janwar razakar.
How this is possible that murerers n rapist is the spouse n sitting alongside his spouse in the car flying the LAL SABUJ PATAKA n the later one flying the flag he wanted to crush with his fathers Paki janwars ??????????????????????????????????
So, friends everything is possible by the BAL n its rogue n its betrayal acts.
BANGLDESH ZINDABAD
ZINDABAD BANGLADESH ZINDABAD
Faruque Alamgir
Ershad's military regime illegal
Dhaka, Apr 5 (bdnews24.com) – The government backed a petition in the High Court to declare Ershad's military regime "illegal" on Monday. UPDATE
An additional Attorney General also told the High Court that the seventh amendment to the constitution legalising the takeover of power by the former military ruler HM Ershad was not lawful. He was speaking in support of a petition filed by Siddique Ahmed, a resident of Chittagong, who was convicted of murder during Ershad's martial law period.
Ershad's Jatiya Party is an ally of the current AL-led government.
The High Court, following the legal argument, issued a rule on the government asking it to explain why the seventh amendment to the constitution should not be declared illegal. The amendment legalised the takeover of power by the former military ruler HM Ershad along with the martial law instructions made between 1982 and 1986. The home secretary, law secretary, inspector general of prisons and Chittagong deputy commissioner are required to respond to the rule in four weeks.
The bench of justices Md Momtazuddin Ahmed Naima Haider also granted Ahmed a six-month bail.
Additional attorney general MK Rahman, who stood for the government, said the imposition of martial law by Ershad, his taking over of power, his enforcing of martial rule and all activities under it are illegal. The constitution does not allow the imposition of martial law, he said.
So Ershad's taking over of power disobeying the constitution was illegal, Rahman added. Barrister Hassan S Azim, the lawyer for the petitioner, had earlier told the court that the imposition by Ershad of martial law was against the basic foundations of the constitution.
All martial law instructions imposed between 1982 and 1986 are illegal along with the seventh amendment which legalised the martial law itself, the lawyer argued. It was illegal to establish a martial law court and the life imprisonment given to Siddiqur Rahman by that court was therefore also illegal, he said.
In 2005, the High Court declared illegal the fifth amendment that provided constitutional legitimacy to the governments in power — both military and civilian — following the 1975 assassination of the nation's founding father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. This decision was upheld by the Supreme Court in January 2010.
The petitioner was convicted in 1986 of the murder in Nov 1984 of Abu Taher, a spice trader in Chittagong. A case was filed at Kotwali Police Staion by sub-inspector Ataur Rahman on Dec 24 of the same year. The 3rd martial court of Chittagong sentenced Siddique Ahmed, Noor Mohammad and Nurul Anwar to life imprisonment on Mar 20, 1986 in connection with the case.
The chief martial law administrator upheld the verdict on July 19 that year. Siddique Ahmed, who remained a fugitive for 20 years, was arrested on Aug 2, 2006. He is currently behind bars in a Chittagong jail.
Explain legality of 7th amendment endorsing Ershad's takeover: HC
The High Court on Monday issued a rule upon the government to explain within four weeks why the seventh amendment to the Constitution endorsing takeover by HM Ershad and all the actions taken under the martial law should not be declared illegal.
The Constitution (7th amendment) Act 1986 covered proclamation of the martial law issued on March 24, 1986 and all other proclamations, proclamation orders, chief martial law administrator's orders, martial law regulations, martial law orders and martial law instructions.These proclamation orders and instructions were made during the period between 1982 and November 10, 1986, the date of commencement of the seventh amendment to the Constitution.
The HC issued the rule upon a writ petition filed by one Siddique Ahmed of Chittagong challenging the legality of ratification of imposition of the martial law taking over the state power by HM Ershad.Siddique Ahmed filed the petition since he was convicted by a special court formed during the period.The court convicted and sentenced him to life term imprisonment in a murder case in 1986.
http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/latest_news.php?nid=23059
__._,_.___
[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___