Banner Advertiser

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

[ALOCHONA] Re: [notun_bangladesh] Mujib and Zia: It's Not the Birth That Is Important, It is What they Became!



Dr.Abid Bahar


What has been narrated by you is nothing but unfortunate facts the nation was suffering for 2-3 years of it's birth.Be it clear to all detractors and distorter's of the real history of MOHAN MUKTI JUDHDHA that Bangladesh was born not out of wedlock between Hindus of Hindustan n BAL but by the mass sacrifice of blood by the patriots Mukti Judhdhas.

The dream of the slain Mukti Jodhdhas was that the nation would be flourishing under the banner of real democracy,HR,Freedom of Expression/ thinking and pursue a life free from any further exploitation n lead a happy n dignified. 

But at the outset of the nation building the same was stampeded by the so-called democrats who snatched the basic fundamental rights of the people and kept them on their toes with fear and anger by snatching the democracy to establish the rule of peculiar form which was termed as "DEMOCRAZY".
Sheikh Mujib had his contribution by uniting the nation against the back drop of Pakistani misrule which led to the ultimate war for dignified survival paving the way for our coveted "Shadhinata with the LAL SABUJ PATAKA flying high in the blue sky. But the episode after the dawn of independence does not make destination of the nation to the desired dream of the Mukti Jodhdhas.

If anyone wants to deny the truth and the harsh truth of the immediate past history that Sheikh Mujib, the life long democrat turned himself( or surrendered) to the establishment of one party fascism "BAKSAL" and Ziaur Rahman will remain glittering as the only pioneer and champion of multi-party democracy (which has helped Hasina to become two time PM)  in the pages of the history that portrays TRUTH N NOTHING BUT TRUTH.

No matters what the detractors says or writes or pays the hired alien to write (n p.alu the RAW owned paper) but cannot taint the great Ziaur Rahman, the CHAMPION OF DEMCRACY unless they believe in truth and harsh facts.

Faruque Alamgir

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:30 PM, abid bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com> wrote:
 

Mujib and Zia: It's Not the Birth that Is Important, It is What they Became!
Abid Bahar
 
It is not a healthy sign by intellectuals in a nation to compare between their leaders' achievements and mislead the nation. But lately it is happening in its uglyest manner especially in Hasina's second term in office. In trying to prove Mujib as a democrat, a great leader, AL' is even physically destroying the opposition party leader's traces by vandalizing the historic monoments. In the past, BNP also did it but Hasina is breaking the record in this mischevious act. She is acting like an elected goon.
 
Was Mujib a Dictator or a Democrat?
 
Following her lead, the hero-worshippers in the AL camp continue to mislead the nation by saying that Mujib was a democrat by birth and Zia was a
dictator.(1) To them it is evident in Mujib's life-long struggle for democracy and Zia's coming to power from military background. 
 
This is an easy way to only fool the ignorants and fools by seemingly village tout like Gaffor Chu, professor politician Montosir Mamun and the others. Let's go for a little more details to see if it is one's birth that is important than what they ( Mujib and Zia ) became.  
 
Mujib's early life shows he was not born as a thug but became a thug in his school years. Suhorwarthy picked him up and used him as a massleman. Kamruddin Ahamed and Toffozal Hossain Manik Mia records that during election time Mujib used to have fist fight with his opponents, similar to todays by the Chatro League's so-called students. No wonder Mujib was the founder of Chatro League. While in politics, Mujib fought for democracy and when came to power established one party dictatorship and became the king of the thugs, and to keep his dynastic rule safe trained his son in the military, kept Rakki Bahini led by Indian cheif and became a puppet of India. At this point, did this man show any sign of a democrat? The answer is a clear no!
 
So, history shows Mujib was not born as a thug but became a thug to a dictator. Hasina continues the tradition of her father more vigorously.
 
During the war in 1971, Mujib's clever moves: exile in Pakistan and his family safe in Dhaka but genocide continues in Dhaka ( says many unexplained things), his Fourth Amendmend and the BKSAL party dictatorship and his "bottomless basket Bangladesh" are his testimonies of how a thug becoming the father/ dictator and what the nation became.  
 
Zia
Unike Mujib, Zia's fortune didn't shine because he was picked up by a populist leader to work as a mussalman, for Zia, he was a brilliant school going student and was selected as a cadet in the military, at times of action he declared independence in the name of his leader Mujib who was in Pakistan. When Mujib's democratic faction led by Mostaque with freedom fighters Majors ousted the fascist Mujib, followed by Col Taher killing army officers in the army to create a chinese style sepoy military, when there was a general nationwide chaos from the beginning and the end of BKSAL, the nation needed a leader, Ziaur Rahman.was released from the house arrest  to save the nation. Zia came to power after the bloody Mostaque government not the Mujib government.The nation invited him to lead. Many people didn't know that in the West, Churchill and many other Western leaders came from military background to lead the nation.
Mujib was not replaced by Zia's coup, he was replaced by Mostaque and his large number of AL team members. Zia took over by founding a democratic party, he made the Fifth Amendmend and began the multiparty democracy in which he allowed even Hasina. He opened market economy changing Mujib's North Korea style Socialist Fascist economy.Does this looks like democracy? The answer is yes. For his contributions, he was even called by many as the father of modern Bangladesh. 
 
It was not where Zia came from, it was what Zia became and helped the country become.
 
Remember, Hasina asked the nation forgiveness for BKSAL misdeed, now elected in the second time she cancelled the Fifth amendmend and according to Hanif she is establishing BKSAL.She also reenected Mujib as the "Father..." Look at Mujib's Chatro League, Jubo League, they were not made in Zia's Cantonment but they defy the police, the army, the public they follow their thug father Mujib who was also born innocent but killed close to 30,00 of his own people..
 
In the end, despite their strengths and weaknesses, not just Mujib alone, leaders like Bhasani, Mujib and Zia who survived the 1971 war of liberation, should be honored as the founding fathers of Bangladesh. Again for the village touts and rapists like Manik, a lesson to learn, it's Not the Birth That Is Important, It is What you become!  Imagine, some people were born innocent, but bome rapists!
 
Khalida Zia's Birthday
 
No doubt, like most people, Khalida Zia's birth was innocent but we have to know what she became. We know she had one real birth day then like most Bangladeshis when registered in school, the headmaster registered another birth day. But once house wife like Hasina, Khalida Zia became the Prime Minister seems to have another birth day on 15th August. That is if Mujib didn't impose dictatorship on the nation and was not killed on this day, nether Hasina nor Khalida, could become the prime Minister of Bangladesh. She is simply being honest about her third birthday.
 
Now that Khalida adapted this date as her third birth day, Hasina should also adapt a birthday chosen by her famous Bengali dada Pronob Chaterjee. We recommend her to chose the day when a billion dollar loan was signed for Bangladesh to help India built the transit infracture. This means with Indian digital help she had her third birthday; she will remain as the Prime Minsiter until 2021. Surely India will also help Hasina to secure her job, this is Hasina's birth day. But it is not once's birth, it is what one bacame!
 
For the nation, shall we follow the birth days or what we became?  
Some of these petit empty vassel ALs who find Khalida's birthdates very objectionable (one here, Syed Aslam) keeps fake names and is afraid that their own misdeeds will put them into trouble. This is not about birthdate but about misrepresentation, a criminal act indeed! Why to blame the petits, we have criminal judges judging good people with true birthdates, births and even freedom fighters as being razakars! (3) Again it's not the birth what what one became! 
 
REFERENCES:
(1)
BNP's birth in cantonment -1 :Some inside stories [Shadows of US connections]
 
 




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com



Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___