It is encouraging to see someone showing interest in the ongoing International Crimes Tribunal in Dhaka.
However, there are some serious misgivings in some of the basic ideas expressed here. I will try to touch upon a few:
1. Only the State, not individuals, can bring charges of War Crimes at a specially set up Tribunal (i.e. not an ordinary criminal court).
We, the citizens, have been pressing for a trial of the war crimes of 1971 for all these years, yet no 'regime' in power, not even the Awami League led regime in 1996, had been forthcoming until this present Govt. It should not be forgotten that one of the election campaign promises made in 2008 by the Awami League and its alliance parties was to hold the War Crimes Trial. It really was the people's mandate to hold the War Crimes Tribunal. I do not see how any doubt can be expressed about that.
Therefore, I am not sure what you are doubtful about. The Tribunal has been set up due to intense pressure from the non-partisan Citizens' Groups. And, we are already complaining about the lack of Govt. efficiency. The Govt. funding is not adequate. Nor are there enough legal and experienced professionals manning the Prosecution. The Jamaatis, on the other hand, are massively armed with expensive Counsels, some hired from abroad. Talk about "dominant narrative"! The Defence section of this Tribunal is a spectacle of DOMINANCE! They are also very clever in spreading lies and rumors.
2. An International War Crimes Tribunal has to abide by certain international Conventions and Treaties to which Bangladesh is a signatory. The Dhaka Tribunal has been assured of logistical support by the UNDP.
Your feeling that it is "trap" to punish the Opposition -- a ridiculously illogical concept to begin with -- simply flies in the face of reality. Think of it carefully -- members of the Opposition were either involved in war crimes of 1971 or not. Suddenly, after 40 years, one cannot be trapped as a 'war criminal'. Since the present Tribunal intends to bring to justice only those personnel against whom there had been proven evidence, as symbolic of the massive accounts of atrocities committed during the months of 1971, there can be no logic or basis to the allegations of setting up a trap.
3. Once again, the Tribunal is an entity totally separated from the rest of the country's normal, day-to-day judiciary mechanism.
You, and all the others should follow the progress of the Tribunal and then give your opinions in a more knowledgeable way.
For example, here is a latest piece of news:
http://www.unbconnect.com/component/news/task-show/id-48496
Hope I have been able to clear certain ideas. It would be beneficial for all -- on every side of the conflict -- not to form assumptions based on deliberately disseminated misinformation.
Farida Majid
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: msahmed21@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 05:24:27 +0100
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Re International Crime Tribunal
__._,_.___
[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___