Dear sirs,
Assalamu Alaikum.It is futile to discuss about the reasonableness of partition in 1947.Much greater people decided on partition including Gandhi, Quaid e Azam, Iqbal, Liaqat Ali, Fazlul Huq, Suhrawardyetc.
Yousuf sahib and present leaders are small nuts compared to them.
From Islamic point of view partition has created possibility of two Islamic states( full or in part) in two sides of the sub continent.
Without partition Hindu Muslim relations would have been much worse.
Only feasible course now is to convert SAARC into an EU type organization over time.
Shah Abdul Hannan
-----Original Message-----
From: alochona@yahoogroups.com [mailto:alochona@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Isha Khan
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 7:36 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Lessons from
Lessons from
By Nasim Yousaf
The partition of
atrocities in the region; it further resulted in the
bitter rivalry between a nuclear
episode provides a lesson for the world to learn from.
In
written under the influence of the All-India Muslim League (AIML) and
Indian National Congress (INC) parties respectively, to which the
British transferred power in 1947. According to the traditional
narrative propagated by these two parties, partition was inevitable
and the two parties were responsible for bringing freedom to British
historical documents strongly suggest that the leaders of both parties
did not have the power to demolish British rule. In fact, the reality
is that the leaders of the AIML and the INC were playing into the
hands of the British rulers. Ultimately, partition has only produced
harsh consequences and unending hostility within the region.
In order to understand why partition was ill-advised from the outset,
one must first understand why Muslim League and Congress leaders, who
were responsible for partition, ultimately contributed to British
interests. During the years leading up to partition, the British were
seeking to maintain their rule over
of Divide and Rule. In other words, they sought to perpetuate
divisions amongst the Muslims and Hindus, so that the Muslims and
Hindus would not be able to rise up against British rule. There are
countless examples of the British pursuit of this policy. Rather than
forming a united front to undermine the British, Muslim League and
Congress leaders instead added fuel to the fire by legitimizing and
inflating the political differences between the Muslims and Hindus,
ultimately blowing the conflict out of proportion. It is not difficult
to see why this policy was in the interests of the Muslim and Hindu
leaders. At the time, the British were very powerful and had the
ability to sideline any leader who did not fall in line with their
agenda. Thus, it was incumbent upon Muslim League and Congress leaders
to perpetuate the Muslim-Hindu conflict, or risk losing their own
political careers.
Throughout his political endeavors, freedom fighter Allama Mashriqi
repeatedly sought to expose the vested interests of the prevailing
Indian leadership. Mashriqi could foresee that the Muslim and Hindu
leaders’ divisive words and actions were setting the stage for the
partition of the nation. He recognized that partition would be
devastating to the nation and would bring about everlasting hostility
in the region. In a monumental press statement in early 1947, he
categorically warned, “I see massacre of at least one million people.”
He also sent a telegram to Lord Mountbatten (Viceroy of India)
“foreshadowing murder and ruin of at least ten million Indians…”
Envisioning the serious repercussions of partition, Mashriqi worked
tirelessly to bring about the liberation of a united
struggle almost cost him his life, and he was stabbed and arrested in
June 09, 1947) to accept a truncated
With the partition of
Partition brought unthinkable tragedy, as at least one million
Muslims, Hindus, and Sikhs were brutally killed and countless young
Muslim and non-Muslim females were raped or abducted. Parents,
children, and spouses witnessed the slaughter of loved ones and were
forcefully separated. There are countless heartbreaking stories such
as these that speak to the atrocities that befell innocent people as a
result of the country’s division; these Muslim and non-Muslim
civilians were the unfortunate victims of the politics of the AIML and
Congress (their deaths were not a necessary sacrifice for
independence, as has been suggested by some writers and speakers).
Beyond the direct human toll, partition also produced a host of other
far-reaching consequences in the region, including the
conflict, four wars, countless border clashes, and the spread of
terrorism in the region. Perhaps most importantly, a nation comprised
of communities that had co-existed for centuries has now been
transformed into two nuclear-armed hostile neighbors. The regional and
global instability caused by partition has had immeasurable
consequences, and the people of the two nations continue to suffer
from these consequences even today.
It is clear then that the partition of
blunders of the 20th century. Yet instead of condemning the policies
of the political parties that actually created this partition,
historians and writers have presented partition as an inevitable
occurrence. They project AIML and Congress leaders as heroes, while
ignoring the fact that their actions resulted in tremendous human
tragedy and everlasting hostility within the region. Furthermore,
writers neglect to mention that partition would not have occurred, had
it not been in the interest of the ruling power at the time. While
bolstering the pro-partition perspective of those in power, mainstream
writers have simultaneously distorted the views of Mashriqi (and
others who strongly favored a united
media (including television) further contribute to this distortion, as
they do not publish or allow discussion of facts that are contrary to
the traditional narrative of partition. In both
they promote the leaders of the AIML and Congress respectively. A lack
of independent researchers and scholars in these countries has also
contributed to the problem. It is no surprise then, that the true
history of the nation is unknown to people of both countries. In fact,
the history of both countries, as currently written, is biased and
does not reflect reality.
Despite the false narrative that has been portrayed in books and the
media, it is not too late to change the status quo. The people of
endorsing partition, as it only leads to continuing hostility between
the two nations; the concocted and exaggerated stories regarding the
freedom movement must come to an end. History can still be restored
through independent writing and thought; educational institutions must
also be reformed to encourage new ideas and research. Ultimately, the
people of
relations, but also to unite the two countries. The reunion of over a
billion people in
By returning to Allama Mashriqi’s selfless ideology and vision of a
united
the two neighboring countries would disappear, and the threat of
terrorism could be eradicated jointly. Unification would thus finally
bring much-needed political, social, and economic stability to the
South Asian region, and have far-reaching benefits for the world at
large.
-------------
Nasim Yousaf is a scholar and historian who has presented papers at
contributed articles to the “Harvard Asia Quarterly” and the “World
History Encyclopedia (
My Grandfather, Allama Mashriqi,” discusses the role of Mashriqi and
Gandhi in the freedom movement, their political differences, and the
true driving force behind the liberation of
Copyright © 2011 Nasim Yousaf
E mail : infomashriqi@yahoo.com
http://newsfrombangladesh.net/view.php?hidRecord=358766
------------------------------------
[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
__._,_.___
