Mozena is generally right. There have been some exceptions (2002 mayhem on Hindus by BNP and 1990 one by JP). Looting and subsequent land grabbing in these two cases were the byproducts. Basic motive was communal. In former case Hindus were attacked only to punish them for not supporting BNP in election. In the latter case Ershad demonstrated in his own communalist way his protest on behalf of his actual and potential Muslim voters against the demolition of Babri Mosque. The recent attacks on Buddhist and Hindu temples were also basically communal in nature although looting was also involved in such cases. 2002 mayhem involved arson and rape also. Many Hindus were displaced a big fraction of which beyond the borders.
I don't know if the issue of bringing to justice the criminals was discussed. If not, the discussion was incomplete. Two other important issues are rehabilitation and compensation. Were these discussed?
Sent from my iPhone
Yes, economic incentive is there, but - those who take part in the repression, many of them are solely motivated by religious motives. These are religious persecutions. Also, religious conversion is a problem for minorities. There is a provision in Islam for reward for inducing conversion; young girls are mostly the victim of such repression. The family involved in this situation usually leaves the country quietly to avoid humiliation. Many families leave the country even before for fear of such possibility.
Jiten Roy_________________________________________________________
__._,_.___