Banner Advertiser

Friday, October 23, 2015

Re: [mukto-mona] Fw: At Homeland Security, almost 100 employees paid to stay home for more than a year




This particular agency is entangled in its own regulatory policies so much that - they cannot fire anybody for fear of law suit. So, they keep their crooks at home, instead of at the office. These people earn salary, pension, and ranking seniority from home. Where can you find such opportunity in the private sector?
That's how government agencies work, and, this is exactly why socialism failed. Nobody cares about anything in the government agencies, as long as they get paid at the end of the month. 
Jiten Roy

From: "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: yahoogroups <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 7:49 PM Subject: [mukto-mona] Fw: At Homeland Security, almost 100 employees paid to stay home for more than a year [2 Attachments]

 


[Attachment(s) from Jiten Roy included below]



 

At Homeland Security, almost 100 employees paid to stay home for more than a year
 
 
 

(Eric Gay/AP)
A year after auditors documented tens of thousands of federal workers on paid leave for at least a month and longer stretches that exceed a year, close to 100 Department of Homeland Security employees still are being paid not to work for more than a year.
The large number persists even after the Obama administration urged agencies in June to curtail their reliance on what is known as administrative leave, the government's go-to strategy for dealing with employees facing allegations of misconduct.
Now Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), who provided the numbers he received from DHS, is demanding answers from agency officials. In a letter to DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson Wednesday, he called the officials' previous explanation for extended leave cases "too broad and vague to assess whether other actions might have been more appropriate."
Grassley said the agency failed to explain how it was meeting federal guidelines to reserve paid leave for rare circumstances when an employee poses a physical threat in the workplace, or how sidelining employees for so long is consistent with numerous rulings by the comptroller general that federal workers should not be sidelined for long periods for any reason.
"DHS also failed to explain why such extended amounts of time were needed to conduct investigations into security issues, misconduct, or fitness for duty," Grassley wrote.
DHS was one large agency cited by the Government Accountability Office in October 2014 in the first report on administrative leave. The audit, first made public by The Washington Post, found that 53,000 civilian employees were kept home for one to three months during the three fiscal years that ended in September 2013. About 4,000 of them were idled for three months to a year and several hundred for one to three years.
The tab for these workers exceeded $775 million in salary alone, auditors found. They acknowledged that their report almost certainly understates the extent and cost of administrative leave because the figures they examined accounted for only about three-fifths of the federal workforce.
DHS officials said late Wednesday that they were preparing a comment for this article.
Grassley asked DHS and other agencies the auditors cited for a significant use of administrative leave to explain why. The senator's staff calculated that DHS, the government's third-largest agency, spent almost $1.8 million last year to keep 88 employees on paid leave. Four were on administrative leave for some three years or more, and another 17 employees for two years or more. Grassley said he wants more answers from the agency.
Of the 88, 53 faced misconduct charges, 13 had issues with security clearances and the agency had questions about the fitness for duty of another 22, according to data DHS provided to the senator.
The employees on leave for at least a year were across the department's components, suggesting "systemic misuse of paid administrative leave," Grassley said.
In an interview, he called administrative leave "a crutch not to make a decision on some personnel problems."
"Can you imagine that we have to write this letter now, after GAO said how bad this problem is?" he asked. "Obviously in DHS nothing has changed. To me and to the taxpayers it's a lot of money."
Grassley said he is working with Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) on a bill that would crack down on abuses of paid leave, allowing federal agencies to send an employee home only in rare circumstances, when they physically endanger themselves or someone else.
Auditors found that supervisors used wide discretion in putting employees on leave, including for alleged violations of ­government rules and laws, whistle blowing, doubts about trust­worthiness and disputes with colleagues or bosses. Some employees remain on paid leave while they challenge demotions and other punishments.
While employees stay home, they not only collect paychecks but also build their pensions, vacation and sick days and move up the federal pay scale.
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=http://wp-eng-static.washingtonpost.com/author_images/reinl.jpg?ts=1410794061904&w=180&h=180
Lisa Rein covers the federal workforce and issues that concern the management of government.
 
 


Visit www.nyc.gov/hhc

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this E-Mail may be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-Mail message in error, notify the sender by reply E-Mail and delete the message.






__._,_.___

Posted by: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___