Crushing the opposition
in Bangladesh
Zoglul Husain, UK
London 4 July
2010. Bangladesh plunged into a new and deep political crisis as the government
deliberately set itself on a collision course with the opposition, which many
presume to be prompted from across the border. The overt objective of the
government seems to be to crush the opposition for perpetuation of its power
and its covert aim being to remove the obstacles in serving the Indian interest
at the cost of the country.
According to
some opposition quarters, the government thus acting as the obsequious minions
of a hegemonic neighbouring country is bound to bring upon Bangladesh untold
peril and dire consequences and, as poetic justice, upon itself too, which
would be reaping a bitter harvest and, as such, it could be quite harsh and
unkind too. Obaidul Quader, a Bangladesh Awami League (BAL) leader, vented out
the recognition of this realisation when he said on 2 July 2010 that the
present political confrontation could be "suicidal" for both the government and
the opposition.
Repression of
the media:
The daily Amar
Desh, a popular and powerful voice of the opposition, not belonging to any
particular political party, was conspiratorially shut down as the National
Security Intelligence (NSI) nabbed its publisher for six hours to get him to
sign a few blank papers, which were then converted to complaints, framed by the
NSI, to arrest the editor-in-charge, Mahmudur Rahman, at about 4 am on 2 June
2010 with a 200-strong police force, on ridiculously flimsy charges. After
arrest, new charges of conspiracy against the state and of patronisation of
Hijb-ut Tahrir, an Islamic organisation, were lodged against him, again
conspiratorially.
Defying the
concerns of the US and the UK embassies for freedom of the press and also
defying the court order not to torture, which is forbidden by the constitution,
the police later forcibly undressed him at midnight in remand, tortured and
beat him up leaving him unconscious, while the paper was closed down by the
supreme court for a month, within which time, new orders may be issued. In the
circumstances, the future of Mahmudur and the daily Amar Desh are uncertain at
this stage.
As regards the
vague allegations against Mahmudur of his connections with "Islamic terrorism",
it needs to be remarked that, according to many, whatever there were in
Bangladesh in the name of "Islamic terrorism", were created in the main by
India (such as JMB) and Israel (such as HuJI-B) for their ulterior motives of
imparting blemish of "terrorism" and "failed state" to the country and thus making
it a target of some foreign powers with the aim of subjugating the country by
India in the common interest of those countries.
The hegemonic
neighbouring country has continued with the same heinous conspiracy unabated,
with malicious propaganda by their powerful media and pockets of influence
worldwide. But it would not be out of place to mention here that the evil
US-Israel-India axis of the Bush era, seems to be in the process of gradually
being down-graded and dismantled in the present Obama era, in spite of defiance
and circumvention by both India and Israel, which may not yield their desired
result, albeit definitive conclusions cannot yet be reached for lack of
unequivocal official statements backed up by discernable actions.
As to the
present government's attempt to gag the media, already previously, it closed TV
channels, such as Channel-1 and Jamuna. By now, all the newspapers, indeed all
print and electronic media, including online publications and websites, of
Bangladesh are being controlled by the government through autocratic actions
and intimidations, the TV talk shows being prevented from any dissensions and
these shows are being directed to eulogies only for the government and its
foreign allies. The government seems to be taking directions churned out of
powerful computers of foreign lands.
"Persecution"
of the BNP:
Irrespective of
whether anyone supports a particular party or not, it is in the interest of the
citizens in a democracy to see that human rights, democratic rights and rule of
law are respected and practised and that justice prevails in matters of
governance and all walks of social and political lives. Any incumbent autocracy
should also learn from the history, for today's power can evaporate tomorrow,
as it generally does.
The countrywide
general strike called by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) on 27 June 2010
on their 11-point demands and supported by many opposition parties, including
the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami (BJI), was hugely successful and the picketing
and processions of various groups of the opposition were also peaceful. But the
Bangladesh Chhatra League (BCL), police and the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB),
according to reports, resorted to violence as they went on attacks, which were
clearly seen to be unprovoked and premeditated. In particular, certain
government-sponsored acts of brutality drew public condemnation, as well as
international criticism, such as, of Amnesty International.
The brutal
beating up of BNP students' affairs secretary Shahiduddin Chowdhury Annie MP
jointly by BCL members and the police and later, as a total disgrace to medical
profession, by BAL elements of hospital doctors and staffs when Annie was taken
to hospital, was a case in point. Similarly, thoroughly condemned was the joint
attack of members of BCL and RAB in the peaceful house of the BNP standing
committee member Mirza Abbas, a former Mayor, who was earlier arrested the same
day. The people, who gathered in the house after his arrest, were beaten up
brutally including women, among them were his wife and his 85-year old mother
and, as stated by his wife, about 50 people were arrested.
BNP claimed
that more than one thousand of their leaders and workers were arrested on the
day and more than five hundred injured. Prominent among them, in addition to
the two above, were Vice-Chairman Shamsher Mobin Chowdhury, Khaleda's advisers
Prof M A Mannan and Adv Ahmed Azam, and Rajia Begum, secretary of women's
organisation, Bangladesh Jatiotabadi Mohila Dal (BJMD).
Clearly, many
of these arrests were targeted in order to weaken and demolish the BNP
organisation. The arrest of Mirza Abbas and filing of case against Mayor Sadek
Hossain Khoka, who may be arrested later, are aimed at weakening the BNP in
Dhaka. MP Annie was arrested to weaken the student organization the Bangladesh
Jatiotabadi Chhatra Dal (BJCD), while BNP adviser, former foreign secretary and
former ambassador to the US, Shamsher Mobin Chowdhury, to weaken foreign
lobbying and Rajia Begum to weaken women's organisation, BJMD. Similarly, the
arrests of the secretaries of volunteer organisation Jatiotabadi
Swechhasebok Dal, Fishermen's organisation Motshojibi Dal etc. were targeted.
The BNP termed these targeted attacks as "political persecution".
At this present
tempo, any leader of the BNP, including Khaleda, may be arrested and the BNP
should have no illusions of any kind about that. The government seems to be
cutting off the twigs and branches of BNP, before felling the tree. Even today
(4 July 2010) Hasina claimed that Khaleda was involved in the bombing of August
21, 2004 at Hasina's meeting. Is it a hint?
Arrest of BJI
leaders:
The government
previously arrested many members of Hijb-ut Tahrir, including its leader, and
later banned the organisation. Previously also many of Jamaat and Shibir
activists were arrested. In the RU (Rajshahi University) BCL leader Faruk
murder case in February 2010 alone, more than two hundred Jamaat and Shibir
activists were arrested. And now comes the crunch, the top three leaders of BJI
were arrested.
On 29 June
2010, Nizami, Mojahid, and Sayedee were arrested on most laughable charges
of hurting Islamic sentiments. But that this was only a ploy was apparent next
day when a raft of cases, such as murder of Freedom Fighters in 1971,
implication in RU BCL leader Faruk Hossain murder case, torching of vehicles
during the general strike of 27 June 2010, malicious propaganda against the
image of the country and its foreign friends, etc. were brought against them.
And then each of them was given a remand of 16 days, which is a record number.
Today (4 July
2010), according to reports, Law minister Shafique Ahmed said that the 1971 war
crimes tribunal could have the three top Jamaat-e-Islami leaders shown arrested
for crimes against humanity on the basis of witnesses and evidence.
The government
seems to be aiming at meting out capital punishment to a number of BJI leaders
and destroying the organisations of BJI and Shibir. When the Jamat-Shibir
activists demonstrated today throughout the country to protest the arrest of
their leaders and workers, about one hundred activists were arrested, as
reported.
According to
many, Jamaat was an ally of BAL and Ershad, during the Ershad regime of 9
years, until at the end when both BAL and BJI joined the movement to bring down
Ershad. Again BJI along with Ershad was an ally of BAL, during Hasina regime of
1996-2001, when at the end of it, the BJI switched sides to join a coalition
with the BNP and won two ministries for Nizami and Mojahid during Khaleda
regime of 2001-06. The BJI has since become a target of the BAL, while Ershad
became an ally of the present BAL government.
So, which way
is the political pendulum swinging?
The writing
seems to be on the wall for the government. The complaint of the opposition
against the government include: rampant corruption, armed terror, murders,
grabbing, misrule, oppression of citizens, repression, partisan control of
administration, judiciary, Anti-corruption Commission (ACC), law enforcing agencies,
educational and other institutions etc. The people's discontent and swelling
rage are gradually cutting the ground from under the feet of the government.
Additionally, its declared intent to serve
Indian interest at the cost of the country has added fuel to the fire. The
total silence of the Hasina government against Indian border atrocities
such as killing of nine hundred innocent unarmed Bangladeshi villagers in ten
years by contravening the Geneva convention, and incidents such as
forcible intrusion and occupation of Bangladeshi agricultural lands in the
Jaintapur border area are not going unnoticed. The people are getting
further enraged.
No wonder
Indian media are hinting at a possible military coup in Bangladesh. Coup or
not, the government is already finding itself in a tight corner. Within one and
a half years of its coming to power, the government seems to have started
tottering.
It is in this
charged backdrop that the BNP emphatically won the Chittagong City Corporation
(CCC) election held on 17 June 2010. It is the first time since 1/11 2007 that
the law enforcing agencies did not interfere in the balloting system. What
internal and or external influences were there at work is not crystal clear,
but the returning officer Jasmine Tuli set an example of acceptable, free and
fair election, just as the general elections of 1991, 1996 and 2001 were
acceptable.
In the recent
Bhola-3 by-election, the loser BNP candidate Maj (Retd) Hafiz complained of the
Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI), NSI, Special Branch (SB)
etc. campaigning against him. About the general election of 29 December 2008,
former BAL secretary Abdul Jalil said that the Hasina government came to power
through understanding with the army. Gen (Retd) Ershad also said that without
the help of the army, this government would never come to power. These three
leaders summed up the situation of these rigged elections. Thus, the people who
termed the CCC election a turning point are more than justified. It boosted up
the spirits of the BNP camp.
The highly
successful general strike of 27 June 2010 called by the BNP camp is indeed a
notice served on the government. And the more the government resorts to
repression and persecution, the more the people will be mobilised against it.
What is more, if the repression exceeds the level of tolerance, some sections
of the BNP and the BJI, which are involved in constitutional politics for the
last three decades, may be driven underground along with sections of other
opposition parties, as the opposition did during Mujib regime of 1972-75.
In order to
play a good role in history, the political parties need to learn from the
history.
Writer: Zoglul
Husain
Email: zoglul@hotmail.co.uk
------------------------------------
[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/