How did he know about them in such detail only 2 days after 9/11 if they were not his people and why he had to write such a detailed Eulogy for those Israeli Agents?
From: Alex James <alexjamesinfo@gmail.com>
Why is Mr. Turkman repeating the typical Zionist lies and fabrications about monotheism? I guess he is not interested in truth!
Ata is/was a Mossad agent playing the patsy role.
It is the Babylonian Talmud that permits all types of crimes against the Goyim. And to add insult to injury, the Zionists blame their victims.
Remember that Zionists throughout history have murdered or plotted the murder of monotheistic prophets including Ezekiel, John, Yashua-Jesus-Isa, Mohammed, etc.
Wealthy Zionist Jews, many of them Talmudist, control higher education, own all of our media and a large portion of our industry. These wealthy and powerful men have inordinate power over our nation. They are responsible for the makeup of our congress and the votes of its members. They successfully promote multiculturalism, homosexuality, fornication, torture, humanism, and war. They are internationalists and promoters of world government.
They consider themselves racially superior and attend to Talmudic principles. These are some of the worst:
·
"If a 'goy' (Gentile) hits a Jew he must be killed." (Sanhedrin 58b)
·
"If a Jew finds an object lost by a 'goy' it does not have to be returned." (Baba Mezia 24a)
·
"If a Jew murders a 'goy' there will be no death penalty." (Sanhedrin 57a)
· What a Jew steals from a 'goy' he may keep." (Sanhedrin 57a)
·
"Jews may use subterfuges to circumvent a 'goy.'" (Baba Kamma 113a)
·
"All children of the 'goyim' (Gentiles) are animals." (Yebamoth 98a)
·
"Girls born of the 'goyim' are in a state of 'niddah' (menstrual uncleanness!) from birth." (Abodah Zarah 36b)
Read about their involvement in the homosexual movement here
http://www.newsnet14.com/2008/05/06/jewish-origins-of-the-homosexual-movement-in -america/
|
COL. ROBERT BOWMAN CALLS FOR ARREST OF BUSH, 9/11 INVESTIGATION (VIDEO)
February 20, 2011 posted by Gordon Duff · 81 Comments
COLONEL ROBERT BOWMAN: "ARREST BUSH..."
DEFINES PATRIOTISM AND DUTY FOR VETERANS, "TRUTH AND HONOR"
Foreword by Gordon Duff Senior Editor Veterans Today
In the video below, Colonel Bowman, an Air Force combat pilot and Vietnam veteran cuts through "the bull." The video is 14 minutes. At least 6 of them are gold. Bowman tells us how the mess we have was planned, who did it and how to fix it.
Bowman talks facts. Some people don't like facts. Some people don't like truth. Some people don't have honor.
Without courage, without facts, without truth and without action, anyone who believes themselves an American patriot is very much the opposite.
As Bush would say, either one, "you are with us or agin' us."
Something you might want to do, write down the things that Bowman is saying, the things you believe in. Then go to your own organization, the NRA or GOP or Democratic Party or American Legion. Go the the folks at your lodge or country club.
See what they think. See if you, just maybe, have been with the wrong kind of people, the wrong kind of Americans, if you can call them that.
Go to your church or synagogue or may be mosque and ask around. See if the people there, your clerics or fellow worshipers are decent Americans. Yes, I am using the word "decent." For folks who belong to that "special" group that supports the restoration of the constitution, but found the candidates they voted for now working for the Koch brothers and Wall Street, ask them what they plan to do about it.
See how many groups that love to talk "patriotism" not only do nothing about it but are going the wrong way 300 miles an hour.
We lost America, our government was stolen from us. This is no longer our country. This is no longer our government. Our police, our military and our courts, with all the courageous and honorable men and women who serve us, have become nothing but criminal organizations. Our armies work for oil companies, banks and that "special" country that doesn't get along with the rest of the world very well.
Our police are little more than collection agents for the gangsters who run our economy.
Our courts, we have always known, help the powerful keep their boot on our necks.
Our government? Every day we learn more, legislators bought and traded like baseball cards. We recently learned that members of our government are receiving stem cell treatments, anti-aging, sexual enhancement and more from Israel.
Bowman tells the truth. If you don't like it, you know what you can do.
So much for my attempt at unbiased journalism for today.
Subject: Must Watch: Al-Qaida leader on video is Jewish, Adam Pearlman, grandson of Anti-Defamation League board member
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:45:34 +0000
Please watch this video to get the truth about the CIA/Mossad/British Intelligence created Al-Qaida. Adam Gadahn & Yousef al-Khattab are actually Jewish, their actual names are Adam Pearlman and Joseph Cohen. 'Jewish Jihadist' COHEN pretends to be a bomb-throwing Muslim
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsUtvOW6SR0&feature=player_embedded
Also check this video documentary that was shown on BBC on how the myth of Al-Qaeda was created:
http://revolutionarypolitics.com/?p=2030
Al-Qaida terrorist has Jewish roots | International | Jerusalem Post
3 Sep 2006 ... www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?...JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid... |
The Scariest Al Qaeda Terrorists Are Zionist Jews Click here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsUtvOW6SR0&feature=player_embedded It should be noted (before someone beats me to it) that not all Zionist Jews pretend to be Al Qaeda terrorists. |
Jerusalem Post: "Al-Qaida terrorist has Jewish roots" [in other words, Jews pretending to be muslims planted to stage propaganda]
from the Jerusalem Post, 2006-Sep-3/4:
Al-Qaida terrorist has Jewish roots
A man who starred in a video released by al-Qaida's deputy leader Ayman al-Zawahri on Saturday, inviting Americans to convert to Islam, has been identified as Adam Yehiye Gadahn, an American with Jewish ancestry. According to Wikipedia, he was born Adam Pearlman on September 1, 1978, the grandson of a prominent Jewish surgeon and the son of musician Phil Pearlman, who converted to Christianity and changed his named to Gadahn (apparently derived from the Biblical figure Gideon.) He grew up in Santa Ana, California, converted to Islam and, in 1995, posted an essay on the USC Web site describing his conversion. According to his parents, Gadahn moved to Pakistan in 1998, where he married an Afghani refugee. The FBI believes he attended al-Qaida training camps in Pakistan and served as an al-Qaida translator and English spokesman. It was the second time Gadahn has appeared in the same video with Zawahri. In a July 7 video marking the one-year anniversary of bombings against the London transit system, Gadahn said no Muslim should "shed tears" for Westerners killed by al-Qaida attacks.
more info: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fakealqaeda.html
Here is a video documenting some of the many Bush lies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTpZYH2x9-k&feature=related
Mujahadeen is a creation of Zbigniew Brezinski. There IS an Al Qaeda, it's called the MOSSAD, MI5 and the CIA, and now, add RAW to it.
This BBC documentary now admits Al Qaeda http://revolutionarypolitics.com/?p=2030 never existed in its documentary "The Power of Nightmares" http://revolutionarypolitics.com/?p=2030
Former Blair Minister Points Out Al-Qaeda Cia Ties" - Democratic ...
"Former Blair Minister Points Out Al-Qaeda Cia Ties" ... Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the ...
www.democraticunderground.com/.../duboard.php?az...all... - Cached - Similar
· Former Blair Minister Points Out Al-Qaeda Cia Ties
9 Jul 2005 ... Former Blair Minister Points Out Al-Qaeda Cia Ties ... Yesterday the prime minister described the bombings as an attack on our values as a ...
www.infowars.com/.../former_blair_minister_points_out_alqaeda_cia_ties.htm - Cached - Similar
· CIA created Al-Qaeda hoax: Robin Cook (UK MP suicided after saying ...
9 Oct 2005 ... _cia_ties.htm> Former Blair Minister Points Out Al-Qaeda Cia Ties. Former Blair Minister Points Out Al-Qaeda Cia Ties.
Al Qaeda = the base + i arabic word = the data base* al qaeda is basically just a database of names of mercenaries who fought the
commies in afghanistan in the 80s !
Remember that British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook suddenly died, i.e. murdered like Dr. Kelley, after saying the same thing.
http://www.infowars.com/articles/London_attack/former_blair_minister_..._out_alqaeda_cia_ties.htm
Former Blair Minister Points Out Al-Qaeda Cia Ties
Former Blair Minister Points Out Al-Qaeda Cia Ties. London Guardian | July
09 2005 By Robin Cook. I have rarely seen the Commons so full and so silent
as ... www.infowars.com/articles/London_attack/former_blair_minister_points_...
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:ZVVuFn5vCtgJ:www.infowars.com/ar...obin+cook%22+%2B%22al+qaeda%22+%2Bhoax&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=related:www.infowars.com/article...on_attack/former_blair_minister_points_out_alqaeda_cia_ties.htm>
<http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3836> The Truth Seeker - Al
Qaeda - The Database
Shortly before his untimely death, former British Foreign Secretary Robin
Cook told the House of Commons that "Al Qaeda" is not really a terrorist
group but ...
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3836 - 26k -
<http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:9Oh3ZsP_exoJ:www.thetruthseeker....
article.asp%3FID%3D3836+%2B%22robin+cook%22+%2B%22al+qaeda%22+%2Bhoax&hl=en&
ct=clnk&cd=6> Cached -
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=related:www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...
le.asp%3FID%3D3836> Similar pages
<http://shaphan.typepad.com/blog/2006/05/questions_about.html> Shaphan:
Lingering questions about Robin Cook's death
So, Robin Cook died on land owned by a senior MoD official. ... After Robin
Cook died, the local police released a statement: "As this would appear to
be a ...
shaphan.typepad.com/blog/2006/05/questions_about.html - 55k -
<http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:kqaNMvY_9oQJ:shaphan.typepad.com...
2006/05/questions_about.html+%2B%22robin+cook+died%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=7>
Cached -
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=related:shaphan.typepad.com/blog...
05/questions_about.html> Similar pages
<http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/al-qaeda.htm> Al-Qaeda
Featuring the landmark screeds "9/11 is a hoax" and "Solving the enigma of
...... Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons that "Al
Qaeda" is ...
members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/al-qaeda.htm - 101k -
<http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:tXvo246fnDkJ:members.iimetro.com...
ubbca/al-qaeda.htm+%2B%22robin+cook%22+%2B%22al+qaeda%22+%2Bhoax&hl=en&ct=cl
nk&cd=10> Cached -
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=related:members.iimetro.com.au/~...
/al-qaeda.htm> Similar pages
<http://www.dailymalta.com/wt/2005/08/premature-death-of-robin-cook.shtml>
WIRED MALTA (formerly known as Wired Temples): The premature death ...
Robin Cook died unexpectedly this weekend at the age of 59. Since the Second
World War, early and unexpected deaths have been commonplace in the British
...
www.dailymalta.com/wt/2005/08/premature-death-of-robin-cook.shtml - 26k -
<http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:3HPsL8ljKI0J:www.dailymalta.com/...
5/08/premature-death-of-robin-cook.shtml+%2B%22robin+cook+died%22&hl=en&ct=c
lnk&cd=8> Cached -
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=related:www.dailymalta.com/wt/20...
premature-death-of-robin-cook.shtml> Similar pages
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
'Jewish Jihadist' COHEN pretends to be a bomb-throwing Muslim
'Kosher Klown" pretends to be a Muslim
Yousef al-Khattab, formerly Joseph Cohen, is seen here in an undated photograph.
Another 'Kosher Klown' that claims to be a converted Jew to Islam. What a laugh. Of all the world's religions, the two that are most diametrically opposed are Judaism and Islam.
Anyone that believes Joey COHEN 'converted' to Islam and is now preaching for the destruction of Israel probably also still believes the '9/11 Omission Commission.'
New York-Based Muslim's Web Site Calls for God to 'Kill the Jews' October 13, 2009
A New York bicycle cabbie who last year used his Web site to mock the beheading of journalist Daniel Pearl posted a prayer calling for the murder of Jews and exhorting Muslims to "throw liquid drain cleaner in their faces." And there's nothing authorities can do about it.
Yousef al-Khattab, who runs RevolutionMuslim.com and pedals a pedicab in New York City, insists the words he has posted on his Web site are a prayer, and not a threat — and that his hatred is protected by the First Amendment.
"If it was a threat, I'd be in jail," the 41-year-old al-Khattab told Foxnews.com from his home in Queens. "I'm asking my God, that's what it is. Every supporter of Israel is an enemy combatant and the immune system is not anti-Semitic for resisting disease."
An American-born Jew formerly known as Joseph Cohen who converted to Islam after attending an Orthodox rabbinical school — al-Khattab called on Allah to carry out "wrath on the Jewish occupiers of Palestine & their supporters."
Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox News' senior legal analyst, said the posting is "absolutely protected" by the First Amendment.
Right, Judge. If this clown was an actual Muslim 'terrorist,' the FBI would have burst into his house long ago and packed him off to jail with no bail, but since he's a 'Chosen One' who is fanning the flames of hatred, he'll be allowed to continue being a 'Kosher Klown' to keep Americans scared and fighting 'Wars for Wall Street and Israel.
And doesn't NYC have some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation?
So how is this 'Kosher Klown' allowed an assault rifle with a 30 round mag in NYC?
Here's another pic of JOEY COHEN pretending to be a 'death-dealing' Muslim.
Be afraid America... and stay that way. It's much easier to steal what's left of your money if you focus on 'Kosher Klown's' pretending to be 'Muzzie' fanatics then to actually stop, think and start asking questions about what in the hell is Wall Street and the Fed doing to our economy and standard of living.
Don't worry about getting robbed in broad daylight by Wall Street banksters and Federal Reserve gangsters, keep your eyes on the CIA/MOSSAD created 'boggiemen.'
"Hey, Joey how's your buddy, that other 'Jewish Jihadist,' Adam Pearlman doing? You might call him by his MOSSAD name, Adam GADAHN."
Greg Bacon
From: Osama, Abu, and Ayman: al-CIA-Duh Telethon
Notice how here there is Star of David in back ground, on the curtains? Now WHY would a person who supposedly hates Israel have curtains in background with Stars of David on them? This guy is probably a Mossad agent! Is this guy a Mossad agent or what? Wake up to fact CIA and Mossad DID created "boogeymen Al-CIA-da"Then he was supposed to be arrested in 2002! The article is at the good website of www.kurtnimmo.com
It is clearer in this photo: Osama, Abu, and Ayman: al-CIA-Duh Telethon Friday April 28th 2006, 10:54 pm
First it was Osama bin Laden, then Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, and now Ayman al-Zawahiri. In the span of a week, these three al-CIA-duh heavyweights (two from beyond the grave) have issued communiqués. "Al-Qaeda in Iraq alone has carried out 800 martyrdom operations in three years, besides the victories of the other mujahidin. And this is what has broken the back of America in Iraq," al-Zawahiri, or somebody we are expected believe is al-Zawahiri, said in a videotape released this evening. Ayman al-Zawahiri made this latest tape—or somebody in the basement of the CIA building did—from the wilds of Pakistan, Afghanistan, or from his prison cell in Iran (on February 18, 2002, the Guardian reported al-Zawahiri was imprisoned in the Evin prison in Iran). Of course, the Iraqi resistance is responsible for breaking the back of the occupation, not al-CIA-duh, the spook league of patsies and useful idiots. Read the full post
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Supreme Law Firm
Date: Aug 4, 2007 11:55 AM
Subject: analysis of "al Qaeda" photo reveals grandson of ADL board member Adam Pearlman
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/08/researchers-ana.html
Authority: Rev. 2:9; 3:9
"Honest HONESTLY, Officer, we just HAPPENED to be here with our video cameras rolling when the
World Trade Center towers fell down. HONESTLY!!"
Researcher's Analysis of al Qaeda Images Reveals Surprises -- UPDATED
By Kim Zetter August 02, 2007 | 9:16:00 PMCategories: DefCon
Neal Krawetz, a researcher and computer security consultant, gave an interesting presentation today at the BlackHat security conference in Las Vegas about analyzing digital photographs and video images for alterations and enhancements.
Using a program he wrote (and provided on the conference CD-ROM) Krawetz could print out the quantization tables in a JPEG file (that indicate how the image was compressed) and determine the last tool that created the image -- that is, the make and model of the camera if the image is original or the version of Photoshop that was used to alter and re-save the image.
Comparing that data to the metadata embedded in the image he could determine if the photo was original or had been re-saved or altered. Then, using error level analysis of an image he could determine what were the last parts of an image that were added or modified.
Error level analysis involves re-saving an image at a known error rate (90%, for example), then subtracting the re-saved image from the original image to see every pixel that changed and the degree to which it changed. The modified versions will indicate a different error level than the original image.
You can see the difference in the two pictures (below right) of a bookshelf. Krawetz added some books and a toy dinosaur to the original image -- both of which show up clearly in the second picture after he's completed the error level analysis.
But more interesting were the examples Krawetz gave of al Qaeda images. Krawetz took an image from a 2006 al Qaeda video of Ayman al-Zawahiri (above right), a senior member of the terrorist organization. The image shows al-Zawahiri sitting in front of a desk and banner with writing on it. But after conducting his error analysis Krawetz was able to determine that al-Zawahiri's image was superimposed in front of the background -- and was most likely videotaped in front of a black sheet.
Krawetz was also able to determine that the writing on the banner behind al-Zawahiri's head was added to the image afterward. In the second picture above showing the results of the error level analysis, the light clusters on the image indicate areas of the image that were added or changed. The subtitles and logos in the upper right and lower left corners (IntelCenter is an organization that monitors terrorist activity and As-Sahab is the video production branch of al Qaeda) all have the same error level, while the banner writing has a different error level. (See 2nd update below.)
Even more interesting is the analysis he conducted on another 2006 video image of Azzam al-Amriki showing him in a white room with a desk, computer and some books in the background. Error level analysis shows that the books in the lower right-hand corner of the image have a different error level than the items in the rest of the image, suggesting they were added later. In fact the books register the same error level as the subtitles and As-Sahab logo.
Further analysis also shows that the books have a different color range than the rest of the image, indicating that they came from an alternate source. Krawetz wasn't able to determine what the books were but says if they were religious books, they might have simply been added to lend authority and reverence to the video. It's also possible, he says, that such details could be added to a picture to send a message in code to al Qaeda operatives.
UPDATE: For those of you who asked for Krawetz's program, you can view the source code here.
You can also view his BlackHat presentation here (PDF). For those of you who think the software is better used to catch media manipulations of photos and video, Krawetz did present examples of these in his talk.
And to "Ann" who commented that she doubts al Qaeda would put subtitles on a video, As-Sahab, the logo in the lower left corner of the two al Qaeda videos is the production arm of al Qaeda. Yes, the organization has its own media production team.
2ND UPDATE: I quoted Krawetz as saying that the evidence indicates that the IntelCenter and As-Sahab logos were added to the al-Zawahiri video at the same time. Ben Venzke of IntelCenter says his organization didn't add the As-Sahab logo. He points out that just because the error levels are the same for two items in an image, that doesn't prove they were added at the same time, only that the compression was the same for both items when they were added.
3rd UPDATE: I was finally able to reach Neal Krawetz at the BlackHat conference to respond to the questions about the IntelCenter and As-Sahab logos (Krawetz doesn't have a cell phone on him so finding him at the conference took a while). He now says that the error levels on the IntelCenter and As-Sahab logos are different and that the IntelCenter logo was added after the As-Sahab logo. However, in a taped interview I conducted with him after his presentation, he said the logos were the same error levels and that this indicated they were added at the same time. Additionally, after I'd written the first blog entry about his presentation, I asked him to read it to make sure everything was correct. He did so while sitting next to me and said it was all correct. He apologizes now for the error and the confusion it caused.
All the PROOFS are that 9/11 was a Mossad Zionist Organized Crime Conspiracy performed by Israeli Zionists and Zionists in the US.
http://www.rense.com/general86/hight1.htm
Highest Treason Substantiated
There is no evidence that Muslims committed the crime of 9/11
By Elias Davidsson (about the author) Page 1 of 12 page(s)Become a Fan (2 fans)
For OpEdNews: Elias Davidsson - Writer
There is no evidence that
Muslims committed the crime of 9/11
By Elias Davidsson [1]
10 January 2008[2]
Abstract: The United States government has alleged that 19 individuals with Arab names, deemed fanatic Muslims, hijacked four passenger planes on 11 September 2001 and crashed them in a suicide-operation that killed approximately 3,000 people. In this Report, the author shows that there is no credible evidence that these individuals boarded any of these passenger planes. For this reason, it is impossible to support the official account on 9/11. As the US government has failed to prove its accusations against the 19 alleged hijackers, the official account on 9/11 must be regarded as a lie.
The US government alleges that nineteen individuals whose names and photographs have been released by the FBI [3] had booked seats on flights AA11, AA77 (American Airlines) UA93 and UA175 (United Airlines) for that same day, boarded onto those flights, hijacked the aircraft and deliberately crashed these aircraft with passengers and crew on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and on a field in Pennsylvania.
The identities of the nineteen individuals were based, according to one account, on what were described as lucky discoveries made on 9/11 by the FBI. The first was the discovery of two pieces of luggage allegedly owned by Mohammed Atta, the lead suspect, which were not loaded onto flight AA11 at Boston Logan airport. The reason why these bags were not loaded onto the aircraft was never disclosed. According to FBI Special Agent James M. Fitzgerald, who testified at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the connecting flight from Portland which brought Mohammed Atta and his alleged co-hijacker Abdul Aziz Alomari to Boston, had "arrived too late for the luggage to be loaded onto Flight 11'[4] According to the 9/11 Commission, however, the flight arrived on time at approximately 6:45 A.M., one hour before the scheduled departure of Flight AA11. [5] It has never been revealed who was responsible for the "mistake" that ensured that the bags would not be loaded onto the aircraft. The contents of the luggage enabled FBI agents, as claimed by them, to "swiftly unravel the mystery of who carried out the suicide attacks and what motivated them'. [6]
Among the items reportedly found in Atta's bags were: a hand-held electronic flight computer, a simulator procedures manual for Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft, a slide-rule flight calculator, a copy of the Qur'an and a handwritten testament written in Arabic.[7] According to later testimonies by former FBI agents, the luggage also contained the identities of all 19 suspects involved in the four hijackings, information on their plans, backgrounds, motives, al Qaeda connections and [a] folding knife and pepper spray. [8] According to FBI Special Agent Fitzgerald, Abdul Aziz Alomari's passport was also found in one the bags. [9]
The text of a Atta's , five-page document found in Mohamed Atta's luggage is made public. [Observer, 9/30/2001] The next day, the Independent strongly questions if the note is genuine. It points out the "note suggests an almost Christian view of what the hijackers might have felt" and is filled with "weird" comments that Muslims would never say, such as "the time of fun and waste is gone." If the note "is genuine, then the [hijackers] believed in a very exclusive version of Islam--or were surprisingly unfamiliar with their religion." [Independent, 9/29/2001] Another copy of the document was discovered in a vehicle parked by a Flight 77 hijacker at Washington's Dulles airport. A third copy of essentially the same document was found in the wreckage of Flight 93. Therefore, the letter neatly ties most of the hijackers together. [CBS News, 9/28/2001] The Guardian says, "The finds are certainly very fortunate, though some might think them a little too fortunate." [Guardian, 10/1/2001]
Other incriminating items were also swiftly found at other locations. The 9/11 Commission noted, for example, that a passport of one of the alleged hijackers, Satam Al Suqami, was found near the World Trade Center where a "passer-by picked it up and gave it to a NYPD detective shortly before the ...towers collapsed'[10]. Numerous observers found it hard to believe that such a document could make it undamaged from the pocket of a dead suspect in the burning wreckage within the building to the street and be found miraculously within minutes. A Saudi Arabian driver's license of Ahmad al-Ghamdi, another suspect, "was [also] recovered at the World Trade Center crash site'. A Toyota Corolla registered to alleged hijacker Nawaf Alhazmi was discovered at Washington's Dulles Airport on 12 September. It contained a "four-page letter written in Arabic that was identical to the one recovered from the luggage of Mohammed Atta at Logan Airport', a cashier's check made out to a flight school in Phoenix, four drawings of the cockpit of a 757 jet, a box cutter-type knife, maps of Washington and New York, and a page with notes and phone numbers. [11] In a car rented by alleged hijacker Marwan Alshehhi and discovered at Boston's Logan Airport, the FBI found an Arabic language flight manual, a pass giving access to restricted areas at the airport, documents containing a name on the passenger list of one of the flights, and the names of other suspects. The name of the flight school where Mohammed Atta and Alshehhi studied, Huffman Aviation, was also found in the car. [12] A number of documents purporting to identify the suspects of flight UA93 were reportedly found at that flight's crash site, though no aircraft wreckage was seen there and no drop of blood. [13] The incriminating items included the passport of alleged hijacker Al Ghamdi,[14] alleged hijacker Alnami's Florida Driver's License [15], his Saudi Arabian Youth Hostel Association ID card [16], a visa page from alleged hijacker Ziad Jarrah's passport [17], and a business card of Jarrah's uncle. [18] At the Pentagon crash site, a "Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Student Identity Card" is discovered with alleged hijacker Majed Moqed's name on it. [19]
On September 12, 2001, the FBI was notified by a hotel owner in Deerfield Beach, Florida, that he found a box cutter left in a room left by alleged hijacker Marwan Alshehhi and two unidentified men. The owner said to have found in a nearby trash a duffel bag containing Boeing 757 manuals, three illustrated martial arts books, an 8-inch stack of East Coast flight maps, a three-ring binder full of handwritten notes, an English-German dictionary, an airplane fuel tester, and a protractor. [20]
According to another account, the identities of the alleged hijackers were determined "about two hours after the 9/11 attacks" by the US customs service who "were able to do that [after] they [had obtained] access to the flight manifests of those aircrafts". [21]
And to complete the picture, the night before 9/11, "three men spewed anti-American sentiments and talked of impeding bloodshed" in a bar at Daytona Beach, Florida. According to the manager, John Kap, of the Pink Pony and Red Eyed Jack's Sports Bar, the men said: "Wait "til tomorrow. America is going to see bloodshed." Kap said they spent $200 to $300 apiece on lap dances and drinks, paying with credit cards and then left a business card ... and a copy of the Qur'an at the bar. [22]
The amount and nature of all of that incriminating evidence suggested to a former high-level intelligence official that "[w]hatever trail was left was left deliberately for the FBI to chase."[23] In short, these men did everything they could to make sure everyone knew who they were, or more to the point, to plant incriminating evidence designed to establish the legend of 19 Muslim terrorists.
It is, however, crucial to keep in mind that the discovery of "incriminating" items or simple statements by public officials do not, by themselves, prove that particular persons boarded specific aircraft, hijacked those aircraft and crashed the aircraft at the known sites. The aforementioned findings merely represent circumstantial evidence or hearsay.
In order to prove that particular individuals actually boarded the aircraft and died at the known crash sites, at least three types of evidence could and should have been produced: Authenticated passenger lists (or flight manifests) displaying their names, identification of the suspects as they boarded the aircraft and identification of their bodily remains from the crash sites.
1. The US government did not present any authenticated passenger lists
The primary source used by airlines to locate the next-of-kin of aircraft crash victims is the passenger list (or flight manifest). Passenger lists are also a legal document proving for insurance purposes - that particular individuals boarded an aircraft that subsequently crashed. This is why airlines meticulously check the identities of passengers who board the aircraft. With regard to the four 9/11 flights, American and United Airlines have refused to produce the authentic passenger lists or certified copies thereof. As a consequence, major media outlets published shortly after 9/11 partial and inaccurate lists of passengers, based on hearsay information. The US authorities have also issued inconsistent reports about the number and identities of the alleged hijackers. No document has been issued by the airlines or the US government that certifies the claim that the 19 individuals designated on September 14, 2001 by the FBI as the "hijackers", actually checked-in and boarded the four aircraft that crashed on 9/11.
On 13 September 2001 Attorney General John Ashcroft said that "[b]etween three and six individuals on each of the hijacked airplanes were involved' in the hijackings.[24] On the same day FBI Director Robert Mueller said that a "preliminary investigation indicated 18 hijackers were on the four planes -- five on each of the two planes that crashed into the World Trade Center, and four each on the planes that crashed into the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania'. [25] A day later the number grew to 19. [26] On September 14, 2001, the name of Mosear Caned (ph) was released by CNN as one of the suspected hijackers on "a list of names (...) that is supposed to be officially released by justice sometime later today". [27] His name disappeared a few hours later from the list of suspects and replaced with that of Hani Hanjour when CNN posted a new list of suspects released by the FBI [28]. It was never explained why Caned's name had appeared in the first place and why it was then removed. [29]
According to the CNN of September 14, 2001, "[f]ederal sources initially identified [Adnan] Bukhari and Ameer Bukhari as possible hijackers who boarded one of the planes that originated in Boston." (emphasis added). Yet, a few hours later, CNN issued the following correction: "Based on information from multiple law enforcement sources, CNN reported that Adnan Bukhari and Ameer Bukhari of Vero Beach Florida, were suspected to be two of the pilots who crashed planes into the World Trade Center. CNN later learned that Adnan Bukhari is still in Florida, where he was questioned by the FBI...Ameer Bukhari died in a small plane crash last year." (emphasis added). These names disappeared from later published passenger lists and replaced by new names.
On the very day of 9/11, the FBI, "which has been combing the passenger manifests of all four planes, was already focused on [Amer] Kamfar" as a suspected hijacker. On September 12, at 8:30 AM, eight FBI agents arrived at the door of Henry Habora in Vero Beach, Florida, supposed to be a neighbour of Kamfar, with a photo of Kamfar and asked if it was the same person. [30] The name Amer Kamfar, which apparently was also gleaned from a passenger manifest, disappeared from later published lists of suspected hijackers and replaced by another name.
The Washington Post revealed that the original passenger lists did not include the name of Hani Hanjour who later appeared as one of the alleged hijackers. In its Final Edition of 16 September 2001 the paper explained that his name "was not on the American Airlines manifest for [Flight 77] because he may not have had a ticket.'[31] Yet Hanjour's name appears on a purported passenger list of Flight AA77 released later at the Moussaoui trial, suggesting that the belatedly released list does not represent a copy of the original passenger list but one which was manipulated.
On 12 September 2001, various newspapers published partial passenger lists of the crashed flights. These reports included Jude Larsson, 31, and his wife, Natalie, 24, as passengers aboard flight AA11. [32] Yet on September 18, 2001, the Honolulu Star Bulletin reported that the newspaper had received an email from Jude, apparently alive, notifying of the mistake. [33] According to the paper, "a person claiming to be with the airlines" called Jude's father, a person described as a "known sculptor" in his community, and informed him that his son and daughter-in-law had been passengers on flight AA11. The names of Jude and Natalie Larson then disappeared from publicized passenger lists. Such a mistake would be unthinkable were media reports be based on the original passenger lists. More bizarre is that the names of Jude and Natalie Larson, whose names are not anymore officially listed as flight AA11 victims, are still listed on the National Obituary Archive list of those who died on 9/11. [34] According to the webpage of this Archive, the list "is based on authoritative sources, The Associated Press and funeral home records". In addition, a website dedicated to the victims of 9/11, even includes a photograph of Natalie Larson (Los Angeles) attributed to the Associated Press and to the Boston Herald. [35]
According to New York Times reporter Jere Longman, US authorities and United Airlines initially said there had been forty-five people aboard Flight UA93, then amending the figure to forty-four, claiming that one passenger in coach Marion Britton had bought two tickets. [36] No evidence was presented to corroborate this explanation.
According to Terry Tyksinski, a longtime flight attendant with United Airlines, a customer service supervisor told her that he had observed two passengers leave Flight 93 after hearing an announcement that there will be a five-minute delay in the plane pushing back from the gate. The two first-class passengers were reportedly of dark complexion, "kind of black, not black." According to Tyksinski, the supervisor noted their names and was subsequently twice interviewed by the FBI. [37] No other accounts, including the 9/11 Commission Report, mention this incident. As these individuals presumably checked in with a ticket, their names should have been recorded on the original passenger list of Flight 93. Were these names then removed and a new passenger list compiled?
According to a report by American Airlines to the 9/11 Commission dated March 15, 2004, "some passengers" had boarded AA11 "after the aircraft had pushed back from the gate." Nowhere could we found any information who these "passengers" were, whether they were listed on some passenger list, and how they actually were brought to the aircraft after push-back. [38]
The aforementioned fluctuations in the number and names of the alleged hijackers (and passengers) could not have happened if these declarations had been based on authentic documentation.
In 2006 a seven-page set of faxes purported to represent the original flight manifests was published in a book by Terry McDermott. [39] These released images are of very bad quality and do not appear to be true copies of the original passenger lists (or flight manifests) for at least three reasons: (1) The displayed images reflect pasting together of various sheets; (2) The lists do not include a signature of any official responsible for their authenticity and are not accompanier by a chain-of-custody report; (3) Ziad Jarrah's name is spelled correctly, whereas in the early days after 9/11, the FBI was referring to him as "Jarrahi' as news reports from the time show;[40] (4) The name of Hani Hanjour appears on the AA77 list, whereas the Washington Post reported that his name was not on the American Airlines manifest for the flight (see above); (5) The FBI, responding on April 4, 2007 to the present author's FOIA request for the release of the original passenger lists, wrote that the requested passenger lists of Flights AA11, AA77, UA93 and UA175 were "available publicly through the internet at the U.S. Department of Justice website". [41] This website contains exhibits released at the Moussaoui trial. An examination of Exhibit P200054 to which the FBI provided a link revealed that it does not contain at all true passenger lists, merely slickly presented graphics purporting to reflect the original passenger lists. The present author's prior belief expressed in previous versions of this article that the aforementioned faxes had been released at the Moussaoui trial, is therefore wrong. Contrary to widespread belief, nothing resembling true passenger lists was released at the Moussaoui trial. This could explain the discretion surrounding the alleged release of these lists at the trial and the reluctance of mass media to highlight this newly released "evidence".
According to his testimony to the 9/11 Commission, Robert Bonner, "[o]n the morning of 9/11, through an evaluation of data related to the passengers manifest for the four terrorist hijacked aircraft, Customs Office of Intelligence was able to identify the likely terrorist hijackers. Within 45 minutes of the attacks, Customs forwarded the passenger lists with the names of the victims and 19 probable hijackers to the FBI and the intelligence community."[42] According to Richard Clarke, who served under both President Clinton and George W. Bush as National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism, he was informed by Dale Watson, counterterrorism chief at FBI, on the morning of 9/11 through a secure telephone line that "[w]e got the passenger manifests from the airlines. We recognize some names, Dick. They're al Qaeda." Clarke adds: "I was stunned, not that the attack was al Qaeda but that there were al Qaeda operatives on board aircraft using names that FBI knew were al Qaeda."[43] It also appears strange that Robert Bonner claims to have received a final list of alleged hijackers with 19 names on the morning of 9/11 while Robert S. Mueller, director of the FBI, still claims two days later that they were only 18. [44] The documents reportedly received by Robert Bonner and Dale Watson were never shown in public. It is possible in the light of the aforementioned fluctuations in the number and identities of the alleged hijackers - that what they received had been lists of names deemed "passenger lists" or "manifests" prepared in advance of the attacks and revised by the FBI or another government agency for mysterious reasons before their final release on September 14, 2001.
While the names of all passengers, crew and alleged hijackers were publicized shortly after 9/11 in the media, the FBI and the airlines have consistently refused and continue to refuse to demonstrate that they possess authentic, original, passenger lists (flight manifests), of the four 9/11 flights [45]. A typical response for the refusal to provide a copy of authentic passenger lists, is that a "litigation is pending". As the names of all victims and alleged hijackers have been publicized within days after 9/11, no plausible reason exists for refusing to confirm by releasing the original, authentic, documents information that already exists in the public domain, unless that information is corrupted or fabricated. The most plausible explanation for this refusal is that the release of the authentic passenger lists (if they at all exist) might prove that no Muslims (or at least not the 19 Muslims named by the FBI) boarded the four aicraft that crashed on 9/11. This would in turn undermine the official account about the events of September 11.
2. No witnesses to the boarding of the airliners
A second category of evidence to prove that particular individuals have boarded a particular airplane at a particular gate and a specific time, is eyewitness testimony and security video recordings.
Did anyone witness the boarding of the aircraft?
According to the 9/11 Commission, ten of the nineteen suspects were selected on 9/11 at the airports by the automated CAPPS system for "additional security scrutiny'. [46] Yet no one of those who handled the selectees, or any of the numerous airline or airport security employees interviewed by the FBI or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on or after 9/11 is known to have seen the suspects. As for flights AA11 and UA175, which reportedly left from Logan Airport, Boston, the 9/11 Commission found that "[n]one of the [security] checkpoint supervisors recalled the hijackers or reported anything suspicious regarding their screening."[47] As for flight AA77, which reportedly left from Dulles Airport, Washington, D.C., the 9/11 Commission wrote that "[w]hen the local civil aviation security office of the FAA later investigated these security screening operations, the screeners recalled nothing out of the ordinary. They could not recall that any of the passengers they screened were CAPPS selectees."[48] As for flight UA93, which reportedly left from New Jersey International Airport, the 9/11 Commission indicated that the "FAA interviewed the screeners later; none recalled anything unusual or suspicious."[49] According to an undated FBI report, the "FBI collected 14 knives or portions of knives at the Flight 93 crash site.'[50] Yet no screener is known to have mentioned coming across a single knife that morning. [51] To sum this paragraph, no airport security employee has testified to have actually seen any of the alleged hijackers.
Normally there would have been airline employees tearing off the stubs of passengers' boarding cards and observing the boarding of the four aircraft at the departure gates. Under the circumstances of 9/11, one would have expected to read international media interviews with these airline employees, or at least some of them, under headlines such as "I was the last person to see the passengers alive". Yet no such interview is known to have taken place. The 9/11 Commission does not mention the existence of any deposition or testimony by airline personnel that witnessed the boarding of the aircraft. Their identities and the role they played on 9/11 remain a secret: As a response to this author's request to interview American Airlines employees who saw off passengers of flight AA77, the airline responded that their identities cannot be revealed for privacy reasons. [52]
The absence of testimonies regarding the boarding process can, perhaps, be explained by a number of anomalies that the 9/11 Commission failed to address. It was, for example, discovered in 2003 by independent investigator Gerard Holmgren and ascertained by the present author that according to the BTS database of the US Department of Transportation (DoT), flight AA11 was not scheduled to fly at all on 11 September 2001 but were scheduled to fly on the preceding and subsequent days. [53] After Holmgren's discovery was publicized on the internet, the DoT hastily added the records for flight AA11 on the 9/11, fraudulently manipulating official records to correspond with the official account on the crime. If flight AA11 did not take off on 9/11, it would mean that passengers, crew (and possibly hijackers) boarded other, unidentified, aircraft. Another discovered anomaly is that according to the BTS database the aircraft, which reportedly crashed on the Pentagon (flight AA77, tail number N644AA), did not depart at all from Dulles Airport, Washington, D.C. as officially reported. [54] A third anomaly is that flight AA11 was initially reported in the media to have departed from Gate number 26, while this particular flight had usually departed from Gate 32. [55] The 9/11 Commission claimed, however, that the flight had departed from Gate number 32. No explanation has been given for these contradictory reports. Testimonies by airline employees would have easily resolved these inconsistencies. The absence or suppression of such testimonies suggests, therefore, that what happened at boarding time is a closely held secret, the revelation of which might help solve the mystery surrounding 9/11.
As no person has testified to have witnessed the boarding process, did perhaps security cameras document it? Apparently none of the three airports from where the 9/11 aircraft reportedly departed had surveillance cameras above the boarding gates. Thus, there exists neither eyewitness testimony nor a visual documentation of the boarding process. This means in plain language that the families of those who had booked flights with one of the 9/11 flights and of the crew of these flights have been prevented from knowing what happened to their loved ones once they arrived at the three airports on the morning of 9/11. Whether they boarded any aircraft, and if so, which, remains uncertain.
Yet public opinion remains convinced that surveillance videos of the boarding process had been shown on TV networks. In fact, what has been shown around the world was not the boarding process of any of the four aircraft but two video recordings, one of which is said to be from Portland airport and the other from Dulles Airport. The Portland video purports to show alleged hijackers Atta and Alomari before they board onto a connecting flight to Boston. Even if this video is authentic and if it actually shows these individuals, it does not show what they did after they arrived in Boston. The other security video recording is said to be from the screening checkpoint at Dulles Airport, Washington, D.C., from where flight AA77 allegedly departed.
Unbelievably, the Boston Herald reported a few weeks after 9/11 that, "Logan International Airport is missing" surveillance cameras" Logan officials acknowledged the "deficiency'". This is significant because two of the flights originated from Logan airport on 9/11. [56] According to the 9/11 Commission's staff, the Newark International Airport, from which flight UA93 reportedly departed, did not either have such equipment [57]. But this claim has been contradicted by Michael Taylor, president of American International Security Corporation who claims that security cameras had been installed at that airport. [58] The video recording that has been shown widely purports to show the alleged hijackers of flight AA77 pass through the security checkpoint at Dulles Airport, Washington, D.C. This recording was not voluntarily released by the US government, but was forced out in 2004 by the Motley Rice law firm representing some survivors' families, under the Freedom Of Information Act. [59] This video recording was released as an exhibit by the prosecution in the Moussaoui trial. [60]
Airport security manager Ed Nelson of Dulles Airport, Washington, D.C., told authors Trento & Trento that shortly after arriving at the airport, the FBI confiscated a security tape from a checkpoint through which the alleged hijackers had passed before boarding the plane: "They pulled the tape right away." They brought me to look at it. They went right to the first hijacker on the tape and identified him. They knew who the hijackers were out of hundreds of people going through the checkpoints. They would go "roll and stop it' and showed me each of the hijackers." It boggles my mind that they had already had the hijackers identified." Both metal detectors were open at that time, and lots of traffic was moving through. So picking people out is hard." I wanted to know how they had that kind of information. So fast. It didn't make sense to me."[61]
Jay Kolar, who published a critical analysis of the publicly released video recording,[62] pointed out that it does not have a time stamp on it, nor the camera number. Security videos typically record such identifying information automatically in order to allow the determination of the when and where. Such recordings are worthless without this data. Aside from the dubious authenticity of this recording, it does not show who boarded the aircraft but only a handful of individuals who appear to pass a security checkpoint at an unknown time and location.
According to Lewis Schiliro, the former assistant FBI director in charge of the New York field office from 1998 to April 2000, cited by the New York Times of September 13, 2001, FBI agents "examined footage from dozens of cameras at the three airports where the terrorists boarded the aircraft."[63] According to the 9/11 Commission Staff Report, Logan Airport's "security checkpoints and gate area were not monitored by video surveillance equipment at that time."[64] Either of these statements must be false.
3. No boarding passes
To ensure that all checked-in passengers actually board the aircraft, American Airlines still used on September 11, 2001, boarding cards with a stub to be torn at the gate by airline employees.. These stubs include the names of the passengers. The 9/11 Commission Staff report,[65] which mentions specifically that Mohammed Atta received a "boarding pass" at Portland airport, does not mention boarding passes in connection with flights AA11, AA77, UA175 and UA93 as if such documents did not exist. In footnote 62 to Chapter I of its Final Report, the 9/11 Commission mentions to have received "copies of electronic boarding passes for United 93", whatever that means, and in footnote 74 "copies of boarding passes for United 93". None of these documents were released. According to the 9/11 Commission Staff report, "[t]he records for Flight 11 indicated that some passengers had boarded after the aircraft had pushed back from the gate."[66] It is not known who these passengers were and whether their names appear on any official list. We have discovered one third-hand report where boarding cards were mentioned. It is a paragraph in a book by Tom Murphy "Reclaiming the Sky". It tells the following story:
A United Airlines manager finds that a gate agent has already singled out boarding passes belonging to four suspicious passengers who were on Flight 93. Terri Rizzuto is the United Airlines station manager at Newark Airport, from where Flight 93 departed. Some time after hearing that this plane has crashed, she speaks on the phone with the FBI, which is requesting the plane's manifest and its Passenger Name Record (PNR). After arranging permission to release these, she goes to gate 17, from where she knows Flight 93 departed, wanting to talk to her staff there. When she arrives, a supervisor hands her four boarding passes. The supervisor tells her they are, "The men, who did this maybe,' and points her toward one of the gate agents who had boarded the passengers onto the flight. When Rizzuto asks the gate agent, "How do you know?" he replies: "They were too well-dressed. Too well-dressed for that early in the morning. And their muscles rippled below their suits...and their eyes." However this report of men with rippling muscles contradicts the 9/11 Commission's description of the so-called "muscle" hijackers on the four targeted planes: They, "were not physically imposing," with the majority of them being "slender in build."
It should be noted that no FBI or media interview of Terri Rizzuto could be located, in order to confirm this story. The identities of the supervisor and the gate agent mentioned in the story are unknown.
4. No proper identification of the "hijackers'" bodily remains
According to the official account, the 19 hijackers died in the crashes at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and at the crash site near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Yet, there is no positive proof that they did. There is no indication that a proper chain of custody [67] between the crash sites and the final disposition of bodily remains had been established by the FBI, as required in criminal cases. The 9/11 Commission did not refer to any such documentation.
Unidentified officials spoken to by The Times (U.K.) in October 2001 expected that the bodies of the 9/11 suspects would be identified "by a process of elimination'[68]. They did not explain why they did not expect a positive identification of these bodies.
Chris Kelly, spokesman of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), where the identification of the victims' remains from flights AA77 and UA93 took place, said that the authorities were reluctant to consider releasing the hijackers' bodies: "We are not quite sure what will happen to them, we doubt very much we are going to be making an effort to reach family members over there.'[69] He did neither explain why no efforts would be made to locate the families of the alleged hijackers, nor why AFIP could not use comparison DNA samples from known locations in the United States where the alleged hijackers had lived. According to Llonald Mixell, landlord of one of the alleged hijackers, Alomari, in Vero Beach, Florida, the FBI "searched the Omari home [and] agents left a list of materials seized, including hair samples and air conditioning filters."[70] According to Jeff Killeen, spokesman for the FBI field office in Pittsburgh, "there haven't been any friends or family members to try to claim to remains of [the hijackers]." [71] Yet the family of alleged hijacker Ziad Jarrah in Lebanon was reported as early as September 16, 2001, to be "ready to cooperate with the authorities."[72] They did not believe the allegation that Ziad was a terrorist. The US authorities did not respond to this offer of cooperation. In mid-August 2002, a new report on the victims' remains noted the DNA still had not been checked, because "little attention has been paid to the terrorists' remains."[73] While the AFIP announced to have positively identified the human remains of all "innocent' passengers and crew from the flights, they did not identify the remains of any of the alleged hijackers. Kelly said later: "The remains that didn't match any of the samples were ruled to be the terrorists'. [74] Somerset County coroner Wallace Miller said that the "death certificates [for the suspected hijackers] will list each as 'John Doe'". [75]
Among documents transmitted to the 9/11 Commission and released in 2009, one document contains the claim by the FBI that DNA profiles provided by the German Federal Police (BKA) to the FBI from Ziad Jarrah's girl friend in Germany (Aysel Sengun), „matched the sample of one of the sets of unknown human remains". [76] The document was found at the National Archives by History Commons contributor paxvector, and posted at the History Commons site at Scribd.
Actually, the aforementioned statement does not explicitly say where the „unknown human remains" were found, but merely implies by juxtaposition with another paragraph that these remains were found at the crash site of Flight UA93 in Pennsylvania.
The FBI claim, just recently discovered, cannot be considered as a proof that Ziad Jarrah participated in the crime of 9/11. First, even if Ziad Jarrah had actually died at the crash site, it would not necessarily imply that he piloted the crashed aircraft. Other evidence would be needed to substantiate such an allegation.
Secondly, the FBI document in question was not signed, dated or otherwise authenticated. It was not either accompanied by a chain-of-custody report that would document the integrity of the specimen from the point of collection to the final results. The legal status of this document is therefore inconclusive. Additionally, four distinct reasons regarding the alleged crash of Flight UA93 converge to throw doubt on the claim that a passenger aircraft actually crashed in Pennsylvania:
(a) Local residents who rushed to the crash site at Shanksville reported to have been surprised to see no signs of an aircraft crash, no jet fuel smell, no bodies, just a hole in the ground. [77] According to Assistant U.S. Attorney General Patrick A. Rose, representing the FBI, no attempt was made by the FBI to formally identify the aircraft. The justification he provided was that "[t]he identities of the airplanes hijacked in the September 11 attacks was never in question."[78]
(b) According to the FBI, about 95 percent of the aircraft was recovered from the crash scene. [79] The FBI did not forward the wreckage to the National Transportation Safety Board for a mandatory crash investigation but "since [it] had no more use for it', turned it over, 12 days after the crash, to United Airlines [80]. Photographers were not allowed to document the recovery of the aircraft. No photographs of the recovered wreckage exist in the public domain.
(c) After weeks of combing the area, searchers found "about 1,500 mostly scorched samples of human tissue totalling less than 600 pounds' or about 8 percent of the total combined bodily weight of the aircraft's passengers, crew and hijackers.[81]
(d) The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) carried out the identification of the victims from the crash of flight UA93 after a "behind-the-scenes tug of war' between the FBI and the Virginia Chief Medical Examiner, Dr. Fierro, whose department was legally responsible for such work. [82] Attorney General John Ashcroft had to formally relieve her department of its responsibilities in this case. [83] It was never explained why it was crucial to have such identifications conducted under the authority of the armed forces.
A detailed and throughly documented study by Paul Thompson suggests that there were actually more than one Ziad Jarrah. [84] In that case, the very identity of the alleged hijacker Jarrah would be questionable. For the present purposes, the alleged identification of Ziad Jarrah's remains must be considered as dubious, particularly because no other evidence corroborates the boarding of the aircraft.
As for the remains of the suspects who allegedly flew AA11 and UA175 into the Twin Towers, a spokeswoman for the New York Medical Examiner's Office, where the identification of the WTC victims took place, said to have received from the FBI in February 2003 "profiles of all 10 hijackers ...so their remains could be separated from those of victims." She added: "No names were attached to these profiles. We matched them, and we have matched two of those profiles to remains that we have."[85] In 2005, the number of matched samples increased to three. [86] Robert Shaler's medical examiner's forensic unit in New York could not identify the three by name. "No names, just a K code, which is how the FBI designates 'knowns,' or specimens it knows the origins of," Shaler wrote. "Of course, we had no direct knowledge of how the FBI obtained the terrorists' DNA." His statement was echoed later by his deputy, Howard Baum: "We had no idea where the profiles came from or how they were developed."[87] In 2009, Newsweek interviewed again Rober Shaler and others who continued in their efforts of identifying victims of 9/11 and the remains of the "hijackers". Yet, in spite of these efforts, "1,126 of the 2,751 victims from the World Trade Center and five individuals from the Pentagon have yet to be identified at all--none of their remains and no traces of their DNA have been found."
No explanation was given where and how the FBI secured the "profiles" of these 10 individuals, why it took so long to hand them for identification and why they could not be identified by name. It is important to remember that according to the official account the alleged hijackers left numerous identifying documents and artifacts (see introductory section of this essay) including personal items, that were "luckily" found by the FBI, and from which DNA comparison samples could have been extracted to permit at least the positive identification of some of these individuals.
On August 18, 2009, the New York Times reported that that it is possible to "fabricate DNA evidence, undermining the credibility of what has been considered the gold standard of proof in criminal cases."[88] According to this report, scientists in Israel "also showed that if they had access to a DNA profile in a database, they could construct a sample of DNA to match that profile without obtaining any tissue from that person." For law-enforcement authorities to fabricate DNA evidence demands, obviously, that experts willingly participate in serious crime and risk thereby long prison sentences, if found out. This may explain why no attempts were made to fabricate DNA evidence in order to prove the presence of bodily remains of the 19 alleged Muslim hijackers at the crash sites.
The lack of positive identification of the alleged hijackers' bodily remains, compounded by the lack of an established chain of custody of these remains, means that the US authorities have failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the alleged hijackers died on 9/11 at the known crash sites.
5. Conclusion
As shown above, the US authorities have failed to prove that the 19 individuals accused of the mass murder of 9/11 had boarded the aircraft, which they allegedly used to commit the crime. No authenticated, original, passenger lists, bearing their names, have been released; no one is known to have seen them board the aircraft; no video recordings documented their boarding; no boarding pass stub is known to exist; and there is no actual proof that the alleged hijackers actually died at the known crash sites, because their bodily remains were not positively identified (except for one dubious case) and no chain-of-custody report accompanied these remains.
In the months following 9/11, reports appeared in mainstream media that at least five of the alleged hijackers were actually living in various Arab countries. [89] These reports led to speculation that the identities of some of the hijackers were in doubt. Typical of such reports is an Associated Press dispatch of 3 November 2001, which states: "The FBI released the names and photos of the hijackers in late September. The names were those listed on the planes' passenger manifests and investigators were certain those were the names the hijackers used when they entered the United States. But questions remained about whether they were the hijackers' true identities. The FBI has not disclosed which names were in doubt and [FBI Director] Mueller provided no new information on the hijackers' identities beyond his statement to reporters." The 9/11 Commission did neither address at all these doubts nor the reports about the "living hijackers".
On September 14, 2001, the FBI released the names of the 19 individuals "who have been identified as hijackers aboard the four airliners that crashed on September 11, 2001". [90] On September 27, 2001, the FBI released photographs of these 19 individuals. Withdrawing from its unqualified statement of September 14, the new press release said these were photographs the FBI merely "believed to be the hijackers of the four airliners". [91] Yet for most names no birth date, birthplace or specific residence is given despite the apparent availability of such data on visa application forms and other documentation possessed by the FBI. The FBI webpage provides the following caveat: "It should be noted that attempts to confirm the true identities of these individuals are still under way." This statement, issued on September 27, 2001, is still valid today, anno 2008, because the webpage has not been updated since it was initially posted and remains, therefore, the US government's official position that their identities are in doubt. Accordingly, a significant difference exists between the official position of the US government, as reflected by the website of the FBI, regarding the identities of the alleged perpetrators of the crime committed on 9/11 and the popularized version parroted by politicians and the media about the guilt of 19 Muslims for the mass murder of 9/11. The 9/11 Commission has studiously avoided the question of the alleged hijackers' identities. It must be added, however, that the aforementioned statement is deliberately deceptive, because there is no hard evidence that any person actually hijacked the airliners and crashed them on the known sites.
Not everyone is convinced that the above account disposes of the question whether or not Muslim fanatics hijacked planes on 9/11. Some people claim that callers from the aircraft actually described the hijackers as Arabs and even mentioned their seat numbers. Such electronically transmitted evidence would have strengthened the official allegations if it had been supported by solid primary evidence, namely that these "hijackers" had actually boarded these aircraft and died at the known crash sites. Absent this primary evidence such secondary evidence cannot be considered as the proof for the presence of these "hijackers" on the aircraft. Additionally, numerous questions remain unanswered regarding the location from which the phone calls were made and their authenticity. [92]
Another recurring counter-argument is that a man claiming to be the notorious terrorist Khaled Sheikh Mohammed, reportedly detained at the Guantanámo base, had confessed to be the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. Here again, in the absence of primary evidence proving that the 19 "hijackers" actually boarded the aircraft which they hijacked and crashed, such claims by someone whose identity is shrounded in mystery and who was no eyewitness to the events of 9/11 cannot supplant primary evidence.
More than seven years have elapsed since the events of 9/11. The U.S. government had in those years sufficient time to prove the identities of the persons who allegedly boarded and crashed airplanes on 9/11, if any. If the official account on 9/11 were true, the U.S. government, more than anyone else, would have trumpeted this evidence in order to prove to the world, once and for all, who committed the crime. No one would have benefitted more from publicizing such evidence than the U.S. government.
While it is theoretically possible that the U.S. government possesses the evidence that would prove its accusations against the 19 named "hijackers", such possibility becomes less and less plausible as time passes. The total absence of evidence proving the guilt of Muslims for the crime of 9/11 gives rise to the following observations:
(a) Due to the lack of evidence regarding the guilt of the 19 named Muslims for the crime of 9/11, it is unconscionable to claim that Muslims (or al Qaeda) committed this crime. Any such accusations or insinuations amount to slander and possibly racial incitement.
(b) In view of harmful policies pursued by the U.S. government on the base of allegedly secret evidence, it is politically irresponsible to accord the US Government the benefit of the doubt by presuming the existence, albeit hidden, of incriminating evidence against Muslims for the crime of 9/11.
(c) The lack of evidence regarding the boarding of the four airliners that reportedly crashed on 9/11 and the failure of the U.S. government to formally prove its case, justify suspicion about its complicity in the crime of 9/11 and its cover-up.
The crime of 9/11 has served to justify two wars of aggression by the United States, an indefinite and global "war on terror", the imposition of the PATRIOT Act, spying of the public, and serious violations of international law. Many governments have colluded in these violations and endorsed U.S. lies regarding the events of 9/11. The continuous reliance on the official account regarding 9/11 therefore threatens international peace and security. The above account should therefore prompt all those who are concerned by human rights violations and the threat to international peace and security, to join in demanding the full truth on the events of 9/11.
END
Elias Davidsson's website is http://www.juscogens.org
[1] The author can be reached at eliasdav (at) t-online (dot) de
[2] This paper is a "work-in-process". It will be amended as new evidence is coming to light. You can obtain the newest version from the author. Last revision 28 December 2009.
[3] FBI, Press Release, 27 September 2001. Available at http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/092701hjpic.htm
[4] United States of America v Zacarias Moussaoui, U.S. District Court, Alexandria Division. Cross-examination of FBI Special Agent James M. Fitzgerald. March 7, 2006, 10:00 A.M. Transcript p. 38. Available at http://cryptome.org/usa-v-zm-030706-01.htm
[5] 9/11 Commission's Staff Report of 26 August 2004 (declassified), p. 3. Available at http://www.archives.gov/legislative/research/9-11/staff-report-sept2005.pdf
[6] Michael Dorman, "Unravelling 9-11 was in the bags', Newsday, 17 April 2006. Available at http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-uslugg274705186apr17,0,6096142.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-print
[7] FBI Affidavit, at http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/atta/resources/documents/fbiaffidavit1.htm
[8] Michael Dorman, supra n. 6
[9] United States of America v Zacarias Moussaoui, supra n. 4
[10] Susan Ginsburg (staff member of the Commission) at Public Hearing of the 9/11 Commission, 26 January 2004. Available at http://www.sacred-texts.com/ame/911/911tr/012604.htm
[11] U.S. v. Moussaoui, supra n. 4, p. 39; Arizona Daily Star, 28 September 2001, Cox News Service, 21 October 2001.
[12] Los Angeles Times, 13 September 2001
[13] Robb Frederick, "The day that changed Amereica', Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 11 September 2002. Cached at http://www.aldeilis.net/english/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2263&Itemid=107
[14] Moussaoui trial exhibit PA00108, at http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/PA00108.html
[15] Moussaoui trial exhibit PA00110, at http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/PA00110.html
[16] Moussaoui trial exhibit PA00102, at http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/PA00102.html
[17] Moussaoui trial exhibit PA00105.08, at http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/PA00105-08.html
[18] Moussaoui trial exhibit GX-PA00109, at http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/
[19] 9/11 Commission Final Report, p. 132
[20] Miami Herald, 16 September 2001; Associated Press, 16 September 2001.
[21] Interview with Edward Alden by Sandip Roy of New America Media, October 12, 2008, at http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=3172f2965d1a32817bff097afa501763
[22] Associated Press, 14 September 2001. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/14/miami-club.htm#more
[23] New Yorker, 8 October 2001
[24] "FBI: Early probe results show 18 hijackers took part', CNN, 13 September 2001. Available at http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/13/investigation.terrorism/
[25] Ibid.
[26] FBI Press Release of 14 September 2001. Available at http://www.aldeilis.net/english/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=372&Itemid=107
[27] Kelli Arena, CNN, 14 September 2001, 10:11 ET. Available at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/14/bn.01.html
[28] "FBI list of suspected hijackers', CNN, 14 September 2001, 2:00 PM, EDT. Available at http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/14/fbi.document/
[29] Xymphora, "Analysis of the Mosear Caned mystery'. Available at http://www.aldeilis.net/english/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1993&Itemid=107
[30] Naftali Bendavid et al, Officials scour U.S. for clues, Chicago Tribune, 13 September 2001; and Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amer_Kamfar
[31] Hani Hanjour, Washington Post, 16 September 2001,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/graphics/attack/hijackers.html.
[32] CBS, 12 September 2001, http://election.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/12/national/main310935.shtml; The Honolulu Star Bulletin,12 September 2001:http://starbulletin.com/2001/09/12/news/story1.html;
Washington Post, 13 September 2001, http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A18970-2001Sep12;
CNN (undated), http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html.
[33] Honolulu Star Bulletin, 18 September 2001, http://starbulletin.com/2001/09/18/news/story5.html
[34] National Obituary Archive: http://www.arrangeonline.com/Obituary/obituary.asp?ObituaryID=64182329; http://www.nationalobituaryarchive.com/donation/donation.asp?ObituaryID=64182329; http://www.cemeteryonline.com/ctz/0Mem/20010911/AA11-2001.htm
[35] http://myfriendsphotos.tripod.com/aa11.html
[36] Jere Longman, Among the Heroes: The True Story of United 93, Harpers Collins Publisher, New York, 2002, p. xv
[37] Ibid. pp. xiii-xiv
[38] Staff Report of the 9/11 Commission, 26 August 2004, Note 31
[39] http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/passengers.html
[40] As an example see Elizabeth Neuffer, Hijack suspect lived a life, or a lie, The Boston Globe, 25 September 2001, click here
[41] Letter in possession of the author. The letter provided the link to the following official website:
http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/flights/P200054.html
[42] Statement of Robert C. Bonner to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon The United States, January 26, 2004, at
http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing7/witness_bonner.htm
[43] Richard A. Clarke, Against All Enemies, FreePress (2004), p. 13
[44] Supra note 25
[45] The refusal to release the original passenger lists, has typically taken an evasive form, illustrated in an exchange of emails between this author and American Airlines. See http://www.aldeilis.net/english/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2329&Itemid=107
[46] Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, Official Government Edition. Available at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/index.html, Chapter I, Note 2, p. 451.
[47] Ibid. Chapter I, p. 2. In support of this statement, the Commission refers to interviews with six named individuals.
[48] Ibid. Chapter I, p. 3. In support of this statement, the Commission refers to an interview made on April 12, 2004 with Tim Jackson, a person whose role is not indicated.
[49] Ibid. Chapter I. p. 4. In support of this statement, the Commission refers to an unreleased FAA report, "United Airlines Flight 93, September 11, 2001, Executive Report," of Jan. 30, 2002.
[50] Ibid. Note 82, p. 457
[51] Staff Statement No. 3 to the 9/11 Commission made at the 7th Public Hearing, 26-27 January 2004, pp. 9-10. Available at
http://www.9-11commission.gov/staff_statements/staff_statement_3.pdf
[52] Exchange of emails between the author and American Airlines, supra n. 39. See letter from American Airlines to the author dated 1 December 2005. On May 25, 2009 the author discovered on the internet a declassified FBI document relating an interview with an unnamed American Airlines employee who advised she had "worked the gate for AA Flight 11" at Logan airport on 9/11. The interview, in the form of an FBI document, was apparently taken by an unidentified Massachussets State Trooper and summarized in the document three days later. According to the interview, the employee "boarded the passengers" for Flight AA11 but "did not observe any suspicious people or notice anything out of the ordinary." From the interview it appears that she was the only employee boarding the passengers. She does not mention the gate number from which the passengers left.
[53] Gerard Holmgren, "Evidence that Flights AA 11 and AA 77 Did Not Exist on September 11, 2001', 13 November 2003. Available at http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/aa_flts.htm
[54] The Flight Path Study American Airlines Flight 77 by the NTSB, 19 February 2002, http://www.ntsb.gov/info/Flight_%20Path_%20Study_AA77.pdf
[55] Ewing2001, Flight 11 The Twin Flight, http://911wideopen.com/mirror/twin11-1/twin-11-mod.htm
[56] Staff Statement No. 3, supra n. 49. p. 18
[57] Staff Statement No. 3, supra n. 49. p. 35
[58] Doug Hanchett and Robin Washington, "Logan lacks video cameras', Boston Herald, 29 September 2001.
[59] Nick Grimm, "Commission report finalised as 9/11 airport video released', ABC.net.au, 22 July 2004. Available at http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2004/s1159804.htm
[60] At http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html
[61] Susan B. Trento and Joseph J. Trento, Unsafe at any Altitude: Failed Terrorism Investigations, Scapegoating 9/11, and the Shocking Truth about Aviation Security Today, Steerforth Press, October 2006, p. 37
[62] Jay Kolar, "What we now know about the alleged 9-11 hijackers', in The Hidden History of 9-11-2001, Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, 3-45, Elsevier Ltd. (2006), pp. 7-10
[63] William C. Rempel & Richard A. Serrano, Investigators Identity 50 Terrorists Tied to Plot, New York Times, 13 September 2001, cached at Doc.130-Times.pdf (emphasis added)
[64] Staff Report, supra 5, at p. 5
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp; and Tom Gibb, Flight 93 remains yield no evidence, Post-Gazette News, 20 December 2001. Cached at
http://www.aldeilis.net/english/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1060&Itemid=107
[80] Ibid.
[81] Peter Perl, "Hallowed Ground', Washington Post, 12 May 2002. Available at
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A56110-
2002May8¬Found=true. According to other reports (Washington Post, 12 May 2002, Canadian Press, March 28, 2004) the recovered human remains weighed 510 pounds.
[82] Avram Goldstein, "Searchers Work and Scientists Wait for Bodies', Washington Post, 13 September 2001. Available at click here; US Dept. of Health and Human Services 7/2002, p. A-47
[83] Ibid.
[84] Paul Thompson, The Two Jarrahs (Ziad Jarrah was in the two different places at the same time on more than one occasion), 24 August 2002, http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayjarrah
[85] "Remains of 9/11 hijackers identified', BBC, 28 February 2003
[86] Paul D. Colford, 9/11 parts split by good and evil, NY Daily News, 12 October 2005
[87] Eve Conant, Nineteen hijackers died on 9/11. What should be done with what's left of them?
Newsweek, January 12, 2009
[88] Andrew Pollack, DNA Evidence Can Be Fabricated, Scientists Show, The New York Times, 18 August 2009, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/science/18dna.html?_r=4&partner=rss&emc=rss&pagewanted=print
[89] A collection of articles from mainstream media on the "living hijackers" is posted on http://www.aldeilis.net/english/index.php?option=com_content&task=category§ionid=10&id=97&Itemid=107
[90] http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/091401hj.htm (emphasis added)
[91] http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/092701hjpic.htm (emphasis added)
[92] David Ray Griffin, Reported Cell Phone Calls from the 9/11 Planes, Global Research, September 7, 2008, at http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10103; Rowland Morgan, The Impossible Phone Calls of 9/11, Global Outlook, Issue #13 (2009), p.136-140.
Elias Davidsson was born in Palestine in 1941. His parents were born in Germany but had to emigrate to Palestine due to the Nazi persecution of Jews.
Elias lived his first years Baq'aa, a neighborhood of Jerusalem, where Jews, Christians and Muslims lived in peace side by side. These early years left a deep mark on him. He lived in France, Germany and the United States until he settled finally in Iceland.
Elias settled in Iceland in 1962 and worked for over 20 years as computer programmer and systems engineer. At 1983 he quit work with computers and decided to return to his once-cherished field, music. After receiving a diploma as piano teacher in Switzerland, he returned to Iceland to work as a music school director, church organist, teacher, composer and arranger. He has published about 20 volumes of original compositions for musical education. These are widely used in Europe by music teachers and commercially available (see http://www.tonar-og-steinar.com).
In parallel to his professional occupations, Elias has for many years been involved in activism and research regarding social and global justice, peace, anti-racism and human rights. He is co-founder of the Association Iceland-Palestine and a supporter of a democratic State in the whole of historic Palestine for Muslims, Christians and Jews. He regards himself as an anti-Zionist and rejects the existence of a Jewish state as incompatible with human rights norms. His writings include articles on multinational corporations, the IMF and the World Bank, the Palestine question, Zionism, economic sanctions and international law (see writings by Elias Davidsson under http://www.aldeilis.net ).
In 2002, Elias started research on the events of September 11, 2001 and founded the Icelandic chapter of the 9/11 truth movement.
Elias Davidsson moved from Iceland to Germany in July 2008
*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr or http://tinyurl.com/yzbolzu ; You can also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending an email to total_truth_sciences+subscribe@googlegroups.com ; free book download: http://tinyurl.com/2afxwx2 ;*** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. *** NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for intellectual entertainment only. To be removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"
From: am malik [mailto:nmalik915@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:02 AM
To: S Turkman
Cc: Pakistan-MEDIA@yahoogroups.com; PakNationalists Group
Subject: Re: Sinning is okay in JehaaD
That sets in. Where are these 72 Hoors promised? It must b a joke. Had that been the case u would have been the first one to opt for the way in. So u saw Mohammad Ata fornicating and going to bars and yet going in for the kill - in the way of Allah and Islaam??Just as CNN news fellow informed us - the ignorants - that Mohammad Ata was seen in a pub a night before! U are a liar Turkman and so is the media that u worship. Even the most debaurch criminal if a muslim - would be reciting Quaran or will be praying to Allah for forgiveness rather than fornicating. It would have been the American mindset who would indulge in such an activity before his death hour. So either the news about Mohammad atta going to a pub is wrong or 9/11 has been pinned.
am
On 4 March 2011 07:31, S Turkman <turkman@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Please try to understand. All kinds of Sins become legal, when our JehaaDis are out at JehaaD against Enemies of Allah, like us. Mohammad Ata and some other 9/11 Hijackers were going to even Nude Bars besides fornicating American Girls. They just couldn't wait to go to JunnaT and have sex with the 72 White Virgins waiting there for them.
From: "shahid@att.net" <shahid@att.net>
Akthar is Bearded Buffoon. And that is what Buffoons do. Using company's computer for personal use. Bloody Cheats.
Shahid
From: Mubashir Inayet <minayet@yahoo.com>
Is Akhtar using computer at his work in KSA to pontificate his version of Islam?
Bad boy!
From: Arif Khan <arif12@verizon.net>
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA My Akhtar is well educated man,but what about his social skills? he has none!! he is a complexed man !!ask himwhere did he study ? in Don Basco railway colony Lahore???? ... Arif
----- Original Message -----
From: S Turkman
Okay, okay. We do not need better education because Schools make no difference. Lets send our Kids to Religious Seminaries of Mollaas in Pakistan instead of Americans Schools now and close down all regular Schools ...!
From: Akhtar Khan <akhtark@gmail.com>
:-) Better to say we think. Language makes no difference. The thought process requires some grey matter between the ears. Going to Burnhall or any other school makes no difference. I had classmates who have achieved the maximum in their fields, and I had dunces who achieved nothing.On 2 March 2011 13:21, am malik <nmalik915@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr Akhtar
I am happy that we both think in Urdu and then translate. Atleast we think!
amOn 2 March 2011 23:13, Akhtar Khan <akhtark@gmail.com> wrote:
A person who tends to forget his past is never valuable. Today he ditched his heritage, tomorrow when somebody else throws some morsels, they will ditch America and go there. Most of the people went because of two reasons. Either they were unable to compete or they wanted to study more. I wonder which category these two come in.
On 2 March 2011 13:09, am malik <nmalik915@gmail.com> wrote:
I see . Really both of u are worth diamonds. Pity that USA did not recognize ur great qualities as should have been done. Ofcourse thay nontheless appreciate individuals who are thrown out by our country. Why should thay Bark if there are others to do so.
am
On 2 March 2011 12:22, S Turkman <turkman@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
They think in Urdu and then translate in English, they make mistakes. Since we do not have to do that and some of the correct English we write is not at all Pakistani type, they think, we have written wrong English.
The Problem with thinking in Urdu is, some Urdu sentences can not be translated in English.
Sometimes we miss typing some words or mistype them and then they accuse us of not knowing English. This mistake can be fixed if we read what we have written before hitting the SEND.
From: Arif Khan <arif12@verizon.net>
Akhtar you are a very COMPLEXED guy,,, One you hate English ? and then you show off t hatyour English is great...I went to Burn Hall Abottabad from 1951-58, where all my teachers were Europeans!! they would'nt even hire you as a Janitor!!!! as I know you come from a Cheap back ground.... or you would,nt be in Saudi Arabia washing dishes and picking up trash of the Arabs...My Typing SUCKS, and I know it ,as in all my teaching Career i had GORI Secretaries doing this "Grunt" work.. as far as my English is concerned I will match it with you any day of the weak and BLOW YOU AWAY... So dont he so complexed about English, clear your mind of the Narrow vision of Wahabism that has infected your brain and grow up and beg ,"forgiveness for your sins " as you are a NMunafiq!! of the enth order... Arif
----- Original Message -----
From: S Turkman
But then, why did you take the fake Oath of Allegiance to USA?
From: Akhtar Khan <akhtark@gmail.com>
Arif, you are a joke. I wonder how you taught people as your English is worse than my 10 year old grandson's. Or, the level of English of the general American is bad because they have had teachers like you.
As for your statements, I believe Malik Saheb has given you credit by calling it logic. It is a lot of twisted crap and I have seen a lot in the last 2 years or more in which I have had the bad luck to receive your emails and those of your friend Shahid. You guys are a....e lickers of the Americans. You took the oath, so help you God. For me, my oath to Allah is paramount. I care bugger all for everything else.
Akhtar
On 28 February 2011 14:10, Arif Khan <arif12@verizon.net> wrote:
Dear Malikiat You will admit that Pakistanis are "KINGS of CONSPIRACY THEORISTS" They just dont look at their own GARAYBAN, that they are the in the Shit hole because of their own Faults and f...k ups rather tha blaming every thng on the US or India or Israel????Its like putting a bandage on a broken arm.... The entire Muslim World is surviving on Oil, Gas;(Given by AllahST) or Aid from theUSA or West? the rest are auseless pieces of Propoplasm, why are JEALOUS of Everyone who is Successful, while contributing nothing rto the Outside World except Problems after Problems !!! God help the Muslims Arif
----- Original Message -----
From: am malik
Arif you make me sick of your twisted logic. And now u are having love pangs for Raymond Davis. Actually the two"robbers", made him take out his weapon with laser pointer and pressed his finger so that the shots leave his innocent rifle and kill them
And Pakistan is holding on to Davis because there is nothing else and again - and if US fellows eliminate him through poisoning or any other means when in our custody fearing that he my not spill out too much , Arif will say that this again is fabricated by Pakistan.am
On 28 February 2011 11:33, Arif Khan <arif12@verizon.net> wrote:
Dear Sir Telling LIES under Oath is unIslamic...Dont become US citizen by LYING If you dont believe in the Oath Than dont take it for Monetary reasons and if you Link this with Allah ST Than dont be ba Hippocrit for money or ease in Travel and lie about it??? thats all Iam saying.. I dont compare taking Oath of alliangence to any Religion or AllahST..Thats a different Oath not an Oath to GOD? it is to a Country that you are adopting as opposed to the Country you are leaving at your own free Will? you cant have you Cake and eat it too? That is MUNAFIQAT ARIF
----- Original Message -----
From: Akhtar Khan
LOL. To say that it is munafiqat when one gives more importance to Allah and less to the country is the height of ignorance. I believe he who gives more importance to Allah and more to the country has a weak eeman. That is why some scholars have said that nationalism is today's biggest shirk.
On 27 February 2011 20:52, Arif Khan <arif12@verizon.net> wrote:
Before becominga US citizen all people have to take this OATH to God and Country...If you take this in Falsehood, then you are the biggest MUNAFIQ that ever lived, or do not become a US citizen and keep your honor and Citizenship of Birth and remain Honest!!!! Thats why Faisal Shahzad LIED and will NEVER see ouside of aPrison, as he took this oath just recently Arif
I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God...
-----------------
HThe episode displays a couple of oddly extreme reactions. Davis reacted very violently to being shadowed, while the US government's reaction to his arrest was equally extreme. Such behaviour can be expected if the matter involves high stakes. Nothing is of greater importance to the US (in the region) and Pakistan than the latter's nuclear weapons.
Linking this to TTG's insight, we could come up with the following hypothesis:
Davis was a member of an SMU [Special Mission Unit], based in Pakistan's vicinity, with the mission of making plans and preparations to seize Pakistan's nukes, if and when necessary. He was sent to Pakistan (with other members?) where his task was to develop intelligence, contacts and agents in furtherance of his unit's mission. The constant ISI shadowing was preventing him from carrying out his job, leading to so much frustration that he snapped when confronted with a threatening gesture by his pursuers. (Alternatively, though less likely, is that he discovered he was being tailed only after completing his mission that day, and he was so desperate that they not report where he'd been or whom he'd met, that he shot them both).
The US government's extreme reaction was caused by their deep concern that the ISI not find out anything about the SMU's mission and preparations from Davis. When the "diplomat" cover story combined with strong overt pressure did not lead to his quick release, they switched to the "CIA" cover story with the pressure continuing more discreetly. The cover stories were, of course, for public consumption, since the ISI knew exactly who Davis was. The ISI would love to get the information that Davis has, but he is obviously well schooled in deflecting interrogation while they are unable to use their more 'persuasive' methods. So, they have to be content with just enjoying letting the US twist in the wind for a while.
The main lesson that the USA should derive from this episode is perhaps this: Pakistan has so little left to lose that it has to be handled carefully; its reactions may be quite 'unpredictable' when gauged against experience gained in dealing with the usual run of client states.
------------------------
---------------------------
--
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; the courage to change the things I can; and the wisdom to know the difference. Anonymous
--
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; the courage to change the things I can; and the wisdom to know the difference. Anonymous
--
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; the courage to change the things I can; and the wisdom to know the difference. Anonymous
--
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; the courage to change the things I can; and the wisdom to know the difference. Anonymous