If BD can be carved out of Pakistan, why not Baluchistan, Sindh, Saraikistan, NWF Province, FATA and Tribal Area?
Why should Punjabis be allowed to keep occupying lands of other nations?
--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Isha Khan <bdmailer@...> wrote:
>
> *Carving Up Pakistan :The Balochistan Gambit*
>
> by Tony Cartalucci
>
> <https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRwyrU3mtG5o-Aj5P0EhBGqupxNMSG3M7DRd4PD3AjP-WOMGEpd163x_YA1QKuyJhsS5aAoVExaxDDrQ7SpujBPQL08mN7jn4_N9HU6YmoSW3sWUwx7mMDI4SM9tMh-I4lTwJ1XbyQcZA/s1600/AfghanistanLanding.jpg>Troops
> will never leave Afghanistan until regional hegemony
> and its full integration into the "international system" is complete.
> When they say "Long War," they mean it. Imperialism 2.0.
>
> Bangkok, Thailand April 22, 2011 - With NATO providing Al Qaeda air cover in
> Libya as they commit an array of egregious war
> crimes<http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/04/libyan-war-gets-weird.html>in
> their bid to seize the country, the last shred of legitimacy for
> America's official narrative regarding their war on the Afghan-Pakistani
> border disappears before our eyes. However, a more rational explanation for
> the seemingly irrational campaign of frequent General
> Atomic<http://www.ga.com/about.php>*
> Predator drone attacks on Pakistani soil is not only on the table, but has
> been put there by the global corporate-financier oligarchs themselves.
>
> To understand US-Pakistan relations within the context of the entirely fake
> "War on Terror" is impossible. Al Qaeda is merely the increasingly tenuous
> public excuse to justify continued wanton murder within Pakistan as well as
> occupations and interventions around the globe. In a broader geopolitical
> context, these constant and seemingly random attacks in western Pakistan
> serve a more diabolical purpose. With each attack on "suspected militants,"
> the all inclusive term used to describe CIA targets, the authority and
> stability of Pakistan's establishment is undermined and whittled away. With
> many of the attacks claiming the lives of civilians, outrage and unrest is
> purposefully being fanned and spread. The recipients of this outrage and
> unrest is a national government seemingly bent to the will of the United
> States as it callously murders Pakistanis.
>
> In particular, Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) is being
> intentionally weakened, undermined, and isolated from the whole of Pakistan.
> The threat of continued CIA operations are usually standing vis-a-vis
> concessions Pakistan is expected to make. After a recent show of defiance by
> Pakistan calling on the US to halt all drone operations within its
> borders<http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/pakistan/110412/pakistan-us-cia-drone-qaeda-news>,
> the CIA responded with multiple attacks, the latest of which killed at least
> 22<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703387904576278122411803628.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>,
> including woman and possibly children, seemingly just to spite and incense
> this reassertion of national sovereignty. The necessary concession expected
> of Pakistan this time around is their commitment to a military campaign
> against the Haqqani network, "allegedly based in North
> Waziristan<http://tribune.com.pk/story/154339/end-to-us-drone-hits-if-military-launches-north-waziristan-operation/>
> ."
>
> According to the International Herald Tribune article, "End to US drone hits
> if military launches North Waziristan
> operation<http://tribune.com.pk/story/154339/end-to-us-drone-hits-if-military-launches-north-waziristan-operation/>,"
> which even at face value smacks of extortion, "Pakistan's security
> establishment has long been accused of having links with the Afghan Taliban
> particularly the influential Haqqani network." Considering that further
> strikes will put political pressure on the Pakistani government to concede,
> the US is driving a wedge between them and the ISI which is undoubtedly the
> "security establishment" the Tribune is referring to. Instability alone
> benefits the United States in the short-term to extort a myriad of
> concessions fulfilling a range of ambitions. But perhaps the most
> overarching theme is to sever permanently yet another link in China's
> "String of Pearls<http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/03/target-china.html>
> ."
>
> The "String of Pearls" doctrine encapsulated in a 2006 Strategic Studies
> Institute report<http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubid=721>,
> aims at co-opting, destabilizing and otherwise neutralizing nation states
> cooperating with China and enabling it to project power and influence along
> its long and vulnerable oil link to the Middle East. Starting in Africa,
> throughout the Middle East, into Central Asia and terminating in Southeast
> Asia, the United States has been conducting a widespread campaign of doing
> just this.
>
> Pakistan in particular has jointly built a new port with China in the
> coastal city of Gwadar in the southern province of Balochistan. This port
> serves as a potential terminal for a north-south transit corridor to
> transport oil and goods directly into Chinese territory via the northern
> Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan. It also serves the potential to host a
> Chinese naval presence. The US bid to interfere internally to disrupt this
> is hardly a conspiracy theory. Globalist scribe Selig
> Harrison<http://nationalinterest.org/profile/selig-s-harrison>of the
> Soros funded Center
> for International Policy <http://ciponline.org/aboutus.htm#funding> has
> published two pieces regarding the overarching importance of Pakistan in a
> broader geopolitical context and "suggestions" on how it can be solved.
>
> Harrison's February 2011 piece, "Free
> Baluchistan<http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/free-baluchistan-4799>,"
> in name alone indicates yet another "freedom movement" contrived and fueled
> to give a favorable outcome to his corporate-financier patrons. He
> explicitly calls to "aid the 6 million Baluch insurgents fighting for
> independence from Pakistan in the face of growing ISI repression." He
> continues by explaining the various merits of such meddling by stating,
> "Pakistan has given China a base at Gwadar in the heart of Baluch territory.
> So an independent Baluchistan would serve U.S. strategic interests in
> addition to the immediate goal of countering Islamist forces."
>
> <https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmMqa2OCxNw3OM1ply0UP9nAfQIBHCrt6aWrJ2GnVuPVhozc-ZUGE0NtvWpkjZGjGQRdwAtOlgG74opk-ikGkzFnZxaTn1uRERjH_484BTPmLIkuiWrA0GqbuG5QncfIneraSTGLosijs/s1600/Pakistanoldmap.jpg>The
> Baluchi ethnic group is in pink. Globalists would like to carve
> out a "Free Baluchistan<http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/free-baluchistan-4799>"
> in order to disrupt Chinese-Pakistani
> relations. Baluchi rebels are already being armed and supported
> by the US<http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/07/080707fa_fact_hersh>in
> terrorist operations against Iran.
>
> Harrison would follow up his frank call to carve up Pakistan by addressing
> the issue of Chinese-Pakistani relations in a March 2011 piece
> unimaginatively titled, "The Chinese Cozy Up to the
> Pakistanis<http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/chinese-cozy-up-pakistanis-5027>."
> He begins by stating, "China's expanding reach is a natural and acceptable
> accompaniment of its growing power—but only up to a point. " He then
> reiterates his call for extraterritorial meddling in Pakistan by saying, "to
> counter what China is doing in Pakistan, the United States should play
> hardball by supporting the movement for an independent Baluchistan along the
> Arabian Sea and working with Baluch insurgents to oust the Chinese from
> their budding naval base at Gwadar. Beijing wants its inroads into Gilgit
> and Baltistan to be the first step on its way to an Arabian Sea outlet at
> Gwadar."
>
> Considering that Baluchi rebels are already being funded and armed to wage
> war inside of Iran<http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/07/080707fa_fact_hersh>,
> it is more than likely similar aid is being rendered to them to confront the
> ISI and Pakistan's government. This three-pronged attack on Iranian,
> Pakistani, and Chinese sovereignty in a region where 3 nuclear armed nations
> converge and billions call home is beyond reckless, providing us further
> insight into the deranged, degenerate minds behind "global governance."
>
> Those under the delusion that US troops will ever leave Afghanistan are in
> for a disappointment. Barring catastrophic economic collapse or an
> unexpected and grievous tactical defeat on the battlefield for Western
> forces, troops will only be moved around, replaced, or even bolstered until
> regional hegemony is established. Even then, the globalist "civil society"
> underlay and local security forces fully integrated and subservient to
> global military alliances would need to be built up and reliable before a
> single boot leaves the region. This will take decades to complete, which is
> exactly why we are told the US and UK will be in Afghanistan literally for
> "decades<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/uk-in-afghanistan-for-decades-says-our-man-in-washington-1766248.html>
> ."
>
> * General Atomic also makes the TRIGA research reactors found in many
> universities throughout America and around the world, including UT at
> Austin<http://www.me.utexas.edu/%7Enuclear/index.php/netl/triga-reactor#>,
> Penn State <http://live.psu.edu/story/13065>, and even next to Kasetsart
> University <http://www.oaep.go.th/index_en.php> in Thailand.
>
> http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/04/carving-up-pakistan.html
>
------------------------------------
[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/