Zana Ghutekurani in FaceBook
After the foundation of India and Pakistan, India became friend with USSR (& other leftist countries) and Pakistan became friend with China and USA . Need to mention that during that time USA had love-affair with middle eastern belt. Balanced power distribution, bipolar hegemony in imp for the peace process or negotiating power around the world. When USSR was unbroken, small countries had opportunity to negotiate and place its position.
The Indo-Pak war (1971), which we call the war of independence (1971), the dissection of east wing from the west wing of Pakistan provided India with opportunity to establish its unipolar hegemony in this region. Thus , after 71, India did not require to look back. Specially after the killing of Khalistan movement India gained its absolute power in this region.
Therefore, When India won in Indo-Pak war and occupied east wing , none of the friends of Pakistan (eg, USA , China) was happy, and did not want to recognise it as a sovereign state .
After the breakdown of USSR, the dynamics in the global power distribution changed overnight. While in 1947, we witnessed bi-polar hegemony (USSR vs USA) the world begins its journey within uni-polar hegemony, and USA gained absolute power.
And USA receive the opportunity to ask for anything, became a wild brat. This is very uncomfortable situation for many countries, for instance, right now the middle eastern countries are under fire. May be it will not be smarter to think that, the USA is fighting against terrorism. Note , one of the major OPEC pipe lines going via Afghanistan. ( Iraq had another one :).
At present USA does not have good relation with China. USA has taken loans from China which it cannot pay back. Besides china owns many businesses in USA too. It is not good news for USA that china is becoming stronger day by day , thus threat to USA (This is why we hear that the China doesn't have democracy :P and the medias of USA are writing a lot on lack of democracy, human rights violation in China) .
Now USA also needs India. Cheaper products, labour, IT/tech support etc are the plus points for USA to think India as their better recruit.
From the Indian side, since the arrival of the Muslims, the proponents of the newly revived Hinduism (900 to 1300) was not very happy. The Muslims who were mostly middle Eastern, not only started to take powers in many places overthrowing recently established Hindu royalties but also brought a religion which many people started to adopt . Until the arrival of the European business people , the anti-Muslim feelings was not there , but it was produced and nurtured under the famous "divide and rule" theory of The British. The birth of India and Pakistan is the contribution of that anti-Muslim attitude.
At current global situation, India's anti-muslim stand is expressed by liaison USA and also with Israel. Therefore, India became number a country to stand beside USA to assist it with spreading (USA) unipolar hegemony!
Close India-Israel tie of India is also considered as anti-middle eastern or anti-Arab stand. We already know that the formation of Israel is criticised by the most Muslim countries around the globe. Thus , having 20 corer Muslims, having close tie with Israel India further clarify its anti-muslim(also anti-middle-east) stand .
India is always interested to work on anything that will put Pakistan in disadvantaged condition and possible failure as a state. Not only India has its eyes on every inch of the land of Pakistani but taking opportunity to help USA and send its Army in Afghan is one step ahead of their expectation, which they never can think of losing.
On the other hand, the relation between India and China relation was never good. The issues on Tibet and Kashmir , they have many disagreements. , Besides the emergence of leftists in the north-eastern side of India also makes it enemy of China.
Recently ,the north-east part of India is experiencing agitation. Mostly the Indo-Tibetan and the Tibetan races live in that part . The cultures of that area which is distinct from the mainland India's culture also adds into this conflict. The influence of china there also is very important issue. The leftists parties have been able to influence people who are already disadvantaged and living in poverty.
India needs immediate control over those areas. [Please note that to dominate those areas, India mainly use their Bengalis from the West Bengal]
In recent years , India needed to have unlimited access into Bangladesh to punish, monitor and destroy all kinds of freedom movement from the north-east states of India including Chinese influence over them. Bangladesh blocks their view of monitoring and establishing domination of the central government. India needed Hasina and her BAL to fulfil their ability to control, monitor and establish Indian authority. Besides, India considers that they won Bangladesh in the Indo-Pak war.
It is also suspicious why Bangladesh experience so much turmoil in establishing government from 2006 to 2007. It seems that, right now India's main goal is to establish a suitable situation, in which it can influence any party that comes into power (eg, BNP and BAL). BAL has its history of unquestionable loyalty towards India, after all it has helped India to ensure unipolar hegemony in this region.
Now India may want other parties within the country to bargain with it in coming into power. It is considered that BAL had pre-election commitment with India long before election. Thus BAL is already India's pet.
India seriously need to pet other parties too. However, India will abhor both leftist and the Islamist parties for simple reasons. Leftists because their support from China (Mao), and Islamists due to its religious stand and its support from the Middle-east.
However, India is also in problematic situation in making friendship with BNP, one of the largest parties in Bangladesh. BNP has Bangladeshi 'nationalism' which directly contradicts Indian interest to domesticate Bangladesh via its west Bengal citizens, it also is influenced by the Islamic countries and china which India does not like.
If any leftist party , that is influenced by the leftists from the west Bengal, and also harbour strong ethnic identity as "Bengal" might also serve India's purpose, though the leftists influenced by China will not be quite expected for India to build friendship.
If India does not have plan to make Bangladesh another Kashmir, It will need to find more friends in Bangladesh. BAL and many of her followers have already opened their hearts , given themselves under the feet of Bharat Mata, now let us see who else India can manage her total access into Bangladesh in future to maintain its status in this region and free its north-eatsrern side from the chinese(leftist) influence.
__._,_.___
