Banner Advertiser

Thursday, March 29, 2012

[ALOCHONA] Why Indira said "Today we have avenged the thousand years of our dark history" !!!

Indira had said this?
How come I am hearing this for the first time after 42 years then?
Is there anything else left for Moslims except to lie?
Has Lying become legal in Islam now?
Indira had only said, the Pakistan's Two Nation Theory ended. She was right and its a fact because that Theory said, Moslim States need a separate Confederation of Moslim States outside Confederation of India under Viceroy in Pakistan Resolution of Lahore in 1940.
Was Pakistan a Confederation of Moslim States before 1971?
If so, how come those states did not have Autonomy like States?
Why Pakistan had become One Unit Country instead of Confederation of States?
--------

--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Nirob Dorshok <nistabdhota@...> wrote:
>
> (How visionary and prophetic Mujib was!   This would have saved both Bhutto and Indira from their tragic fates, as history would have taken a different course, a more peaceful, sober, humane & intelligent direction. Indira Gandhi could not have said,"Today we have avenged the thousand years of our dark history", the most inflammatory communal rant ever expressed, that had instantly destroyed communal harmony in the subcontinent that had prevailed for the thousand years of India's brightest history and civilization, and certainly forced & inspired subsequent leaderships of both India and Pakistan to seek nuclear power, as by no other way such a  racial interpretation of history & implied hegemonic & revisionist intent could have been addressed - making nuclear deterrence the only option for protecting territorial integrity, as the diametrically opposite political and military leaderships thought, right or wrong. Perhaps undeniably, the fulcrum and
> lever of history  lie at the tongue of such larger-than-life political giants! )
> >
> >
> >
> >http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=227543 Saturday, March 24, 2012
> >Mujib for confederation of PakistanSyed Badrul Ahsan
> >On this day in 1971, the Awami League leadership stayed busy all morning working out the finer details of the economy-related issues of a proposed governmental structure for Pakistan. The Awami League still believed that a constitutional way out for a transfer of power from the junta to the elected representatives of the people was possible. What was, however, unknown was that the military regime was giving the finishing touches to the operation it had decided to launch against the Bangalees. Rumours abounded about impending army action and yet there was too the confidence among the population that the junta could not but agree to the proposals made by Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman regarding the status of the republic.
> >As was later noted by Kamal Hossain, in the evening the Awami League team prepared to meet the advisers of the regime to work out the eventual deal that would smoothen the hand-over of power to the elected representatives. Before the team set out for the meeting, Bangabandhu expressed his opinion that the Awami League should suggest that Pakistan be turned into a confederation rather than continue to operate as the republic it had so far been. It was Mujib's belief that such a constitutional restructuring had become necessary in light of the sentiments of the people as manifested over the preceding weeks.
> >When the AL team presented the proposal for a confederation to the government's advisers, there was a predictable howl of protest. Yahya Khan's advisers made it clear that the AL had shifted from its earlier position. The AL team's response was that, all other points remaining the same, there really was nothing amiss in the suggestion. Justice Cornelius, who appeared to understand the AL point of view, suggested that rather than calling Pakistan a confederation, the term to apply should be 'union'. However, since the precise terminology to be used was turning out to be a problem, it was suggested that the matter be left for General Yahya Khan and Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman to resolve.
> >By the evening, though, it had become clear to the Awami League that the regime had little intention of transferring power to an elected government. As the meeting of the advisers of the two sides drew to an end, General Peerzada said that another meeting could take place in the morning the next day, March 25. When Kamal Hossain inquired about the time of the meeting, Peerzada said he would call and let him know.
> >The call never came.
> >
> >
>


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/