I Think she wants to sell her book. The motive is very clear. Whether Sunil has done it or not, who cares? The lady is beyond her prime and most likely, suffering from menopausal syndrome. All the juices have vanished the least to say.
This could be a good lesson for that fat idiot!
-SD
From: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 7:34 PM
Subject: [mukto-mona] Fw: Re: Fw: [Dahuk]: Sunil molested me:Taslima
This could be a good lesson for that fat idiot!
-SD
"All great truths begin as blasphemies." GBS
From: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 7:34 PM
Subject: [mukto-mona] Fw: Re: Fw: [Dahuk]: Sunil molested me:Taslima
I know there are people who will never believe anything she said or wrote. But, it is quite surprising that some women are also testifying against her sexual harassment allegation. The question is how do they know for sure? Isn't it odd, and something to think about who may be lying here. How can anyone know about what happened between these two individuals? This type of incident does not happen with everybody. I don't know what happened. Why people are so eager to refute her allegation. Something to think about – isn't it? I remember when she was ousted from West Bengal to some other state in India, she was accusing Sunil Ganguli for the ban of her book, and her ouster from West Bengal. Her argument was that - her book contained inferences of multiple sexual encounters with Sunil Ganguli, and to cover that up Sunil Ganguli orchestrated the ban on her book and her ouster from West Bengal. Really, no one knows, but these two individuals, if everything was consensual or exploitation or molestation. It is possible that - she may have exploited him. Who knows? You may say why is she saying these things again now? She already said why? Now, Sunil Ganguli is the President of the Sahitya Academy, who worked for banning her book. It's a quite plausible explanation - isn't it? Jiten Roy --- On Tue, 9/4/12, Shah Deeldar <shahdeeldar@gmail.com> wrote:
|
__._,_.___