Both of these are SECULAR countries (India is not Hindu or Bangladesh is not an Islamic republic). However they are both democratic countries. So it is ONLY natural for policy makers to be respectful to religious beliefs of significant number of citizens. It is NOT endorsing religion (Then Bangladesh has to run by sharia laws).
No laws forces me not to eat beef in front of my Hindu friends. This is just good manner.
Classical atheist is indifferent about religion and denies existence of God. However SOME atheists are anti-religious. Being anti-religious is being insensitive and disrespectful to his/her neighbors and friends.
By making polygamy legal only to show respect to a religion, the state is discriminating against our women.
>>>>>>>>>> How about those women who are comfortable with it polygamy? We already have laws against forced marriage and (As far law is concern, this is enough). This is your biased half-baked understanding.
According to you, by making Hindu caste system illegal, the Indian government is showing disrespect to Hindu religion.
>>>>>>>>> This is another "Brain freeze" moment. Go and read my post AGAIN!!
I said, this is a matter Hindus have to decide. It would be bad manner for me to dictate Hindus about their faith. READ it and UNDERSTAND it before you expose your biases again.
>>>>>>> Nope I am very comfortable with what I said. I said it is being respectful to give government holidays on major Hindu festivals (Which we do in Bangladesh). However "Hindu family laws" has to be examined by Hindus not Muslim. This is a very fair position to take.
I don't think America will let Hindus sacrifice goat openly as is done in Banglades
>>>>>>>>>> Well, America offer slaughter houses. Since open slaughtering may pose a threat to communities around USA.
Does this make America disrespectful to Hindu religion? No, in not showing cruelty to animals for satisfying one's spiritual needs, this country has proved itself to be more civilized
>>>>>>>>> You are just full of it today SIR.
Americans (Average ones) love their steaks. So mutton chops and beef stakes are still in high demand in the US of A. Slaughter houses do not sing romantic songs to the animals before they are "Harvested"[ This is the technical term meat processing American firms use about slaughter]. They take them down similar way, we do it in good old Bangladesh (They just use gun instead but this method is not proven to be more humane).
Traditional slaughtering has been well defended by followers of Judaism (They have concept of kosher, which requires slaughtering animals the way Muslims do it).
Animal cruelty has very little to do with how animals are being slaughtered. Those who run campaigns against non-veg foods are fanatical vegetarians (Like the jains in India or vegans in the west). That is a different debate.
However to understand Islamic position (Basics) on non-veg foods, please click here.
Also read,
Is Non Vegetarian Food Permitted Or Prohibited For The Human Being?
Shalom!
-----Original Message-----
From: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>
To: mukto-mona <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Feb 11, 2014 1:50 pm
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Do Hindus respect their women? Any Mukto monas beating their wives and having multiple mistresses?
2. Proportionately more Hindus have more multiple wives than Muslims have. I will not challenge you as it is possible in a country where feudalism is still very powerful. Obviously Hindus are breaking laws. That is what you expect in a country full of corruption. But what is important to note is that Hindu India is clearly defying many noble characters in their holy books who had multiple wives. King Dasarath, father of Ramchandra and Laxman, had four wives. This is called dynamism.
>>>>>>>>> I am not blaming anyone here. just sharing reality of India. As far as law is concern, it is not proper for me to talk too much about how Indian Hindus should craft their family laws. If majority of Hindu men or women feel they should be allowed more wives, they can change that law. India is a democracy and if most citizens feels strongly about this, they can alter it.
3. I simply endorsed your opinion that religion should be kept aside. Now you are saying, "not really"!
>>>>>>> Simple misunderstanding. I did not say religion should be kept aside but I said for that post I was putting religious view on the side ( Leaving my religious prism on the side for that discussion). While I am comfortable with religion, I do not see EVERYTHING with a religious point of view. I felt as a non-Hindu, I should be courteous on a hard core religious issues (Leave it for Hindus to decide).
>>>>>>>> You claim to be an atheist but sadly see EVERYTHING via religious glass.
India or Bangladesh are not "Abiding by Islamic junction" but showing respect for religions. Bangladesh have government holidays on Durga puja, Janmostomi, Christmas etc. It does not mean our government endorse these religion. But accommodating minority populations to practice their faiths. India does the same with Muslims (With Family laws).
I think being respectful to different faiths is a good practice. Such laws shows that state belongs to everyone.
Shalom!
-----Original Message-----
From: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>
To: mukto-mona <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Feb 9, 2014 8:04 pm
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Do Hindus respect their women? Any Mukto monas beating their wives and having multiple mistresses?
Yes, Mr. QR, religion has to be kept aside.
>>>>>>>>> Not necessarily. Since I am not Hindu, I did not want to say too much about the religion but wanted to share my personal observation. A simple token of respect to followers of Hindu religion. I think ultimately it is Hindus they have to decide what needs to be changed.
It is not "Proper" to impose secularism or any other theories on Hindu population. We may discuss it but ultimately it is a Hindu community issue.
I don't know if polygamy is forbidden in Muslim Law in Bangladesh.
>>>>>>> It is not forbidden in your "Perfect India", why should it be forbidden in BD?
Also there are many tough PER-CONDITIONS if any man wishes to have more than one wife. Most people do not know about them.
sh. It will face opposition from our leaders like Allama Shafi who will refer to the edicts in Islam that allows a man to have up to four wives under certain strict condition
>>>>>>>>>> There are areas and views where I defer from Allama Shafi but as a citizen of this country he can form an opinion like any of you can. As long he is peaceful, he is entitled to have an opinion.
. As far as I know Muslim Law in Bangladesh does not allow equal rights for women to the parental property. It was a big issue India.
>>>>>>>>>>> However in some areas women have some advantages as well. So you are halfway right about it. IF someone does not like current law, they can propose a better one. Unless they have a better solution, it is useless to talk about current law.
Shalom!
From: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>
To: mukto-mona <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, Feb 8, 2014 2:07 pm
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Do Hindus respect their women? Any Mukto monas beating their wives and having multiple mistresses?
Sent from my iPhone
As I said before many Hindu leaders have "One track mind" and it ends up into domestic politics. Right to property, right to security, right to inheritance (For women), right to divorce are need of the hour. I remember when our government wanted to have laws to protect right for Hindu women, many Hindus leaders spoke out against it.
This kind of self-centered attitude erodes credibility.
Property rights issue for Hindu women in Bangladesh is complicated. There is no easy solution. Hindu women will not be liberated with this right. It could bring more trouble into their lives.
Shalom!
From: Sukhamaya Bain <subain1@yahoo.com>
To: mukto-mona <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, Feb 7, 2014 5:09 pm
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Do Hindus respect their women? Any Mukto monas beating their wives and having multiple mistresses?
__._,_.___
****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration:
Call For Articles:
http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68
http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585
****************************************************
VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/
****************************************************
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
-Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190
__,_._,___
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Re: [mukto-mona] Do Hindus respect their women? Any Mukto monas beating their wives and having multiple mistresses?
I will touch only one point. I don't know what you mean by your statement that I see every thing through religious glass. Did you mean that an atheist should be indifferent to whatever is going on in the name of religion? I
I will touch only one point. I don't know what you mean by your statement that I see every thing through religious glass. Did you mean that an atheist should be indifferent to whatever is going on in the name of religion? I don't think so. Even a sensible believer should not be indifferent. As a responsible member of the society everybody should give his opinion.
Regarding showing respect to a religion by the state, you are fundamentally wrong. By making polygamy legal only to show respect to a religion, the state is discriminating against our women. According to you, by making Hindu caste system illegal, the Indian government is showing disrespect to Hindu religion.
You are really confused. Allowing Hindus to celebrate their religious festivals and allowing them to have multiple wives are not the same thing. I don't think America will let Hindus sacrifice goat openly as is done in Banglades h. Does this make America disrespectful to Hindu religion? No, in not showing cruelty to animals for satisfying one's spiritual needs, this country has proved itself to be more civilized.
1. From your statement it appears that Indian law is discriminatory. It allows only Muslims to have multiple wives.
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually Muslims are exempt on religious ground. Albeit very few Muslim men practice polygamy (Less than 2%).
4. I know what you mean. India allows Muslims to have multiple wives. That's what Bangladesh does too. And both the countries are simply abiding by the Islamic junctions.
1. From your statement it appears that Indian law is discriminatory. It allows only Muslims to have multiple wives.
2. Proportionately more Hindus have more multiple wives than Muslims have. I will not challenge you as it is possible in a country where feudalism is still very powerful. Obviously Hindus are breaking laws. That is what you expect in a country full of corruption. But what is important to note is that Hindu India is clearly defying many noble characters in their holy books who had multiple wives. King Dasarath, father of Ramchandra and Laxman, had four wives. This is called dynamism.
3. I simply endorsed your opinion that religion should be kept aside. Now you are saying, "not really"!
4. I know what you mean. India allows Muslims to have multiple wives. That's what Bangladesh does too. And both the countries are simply abiding by the Islamic junctions.
Sent from my iPhone
I don't think Indian law permits polygamy.
>>>>>>>>>>> Muslims are allowed in India but non-Muslims are not. However according to a report (Few year old) still percentage of Hindu men with multiple wives is higher than percentage of Muslim men (In India) with multiple wives. Indian authorities generally looks the other way when this is discussed. Laws stays in the book and men have more than one legal wives.
-----Original Message-----
For most of the educated Hindus and even for Hindus in general, religion is kept aside when it comes to religious persecution of Hindu women. Many rituals are still there but they have been made very mild in most of the families. Nobody cares any more about what the sacred books like Mahabharata, Ramayana, Manusanhita, Purans, and subsequent edicts by Hindu orthodox pundits say how the Hindu women should behave from social and religious points of view. They however are used as sources of good moral values. Indian law absolutely ignores religious injunctions if they are inhuman. I don't think Indian law permits polygamy. I hope Bangladesh will follow India soon in guaranteeing legitimate rights to Hindu women.
Yes, Mr. QR, religion has to be kept aside. But will our religious fundamentalists let us do that in all cases? I don't know if polygamy is forbidden in Muslim Law in Bangladesh. It will face opposition from our leaders like Allama Shafi who will refer to the edicts in Islam that allows a man to have up to four wives under certain strict conditions. As far as I know Muslim Law in Bangladesh does not allow equal rights for women to the parental property. It was a big issue India.
If we keep religion aside, Hindu women will benefit with some rights to her parents property. I agree with members that, there are many Hindu families who do not have such issues. However many do have these issues.
>>>>>> Help me understand this part member Roy. How will this bring Hindu women more trouble.
-----Original Message-----
I agree with Dr. Jiten Roy that the lady generalized too much based upon the misery of her personal life, that she could have taken more serious actions against the criminal husband, and that she failed miserably to educate her family.
I also feel that polygamy and extra-marital relationships are not a