Re: [mukto-mona] RE: ISIS is hell-bent to establish real Islamic Caliphate in the middle-East just like Prophet Muhammad did in the 7th century Medina.

During the Abbasid regime, Islam produced Mutazilla community which challenged tenets of Islam. Even today, extremists in Islam are minorities. Vast majority of moderates would sweep them aside in time. I have talked to a few of them even in madrasah. All they need is to learn more about the past.

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 30, 2014, at 6:11 AM, "Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

People have right to ventilate their minds in this forum. Whether their opinions are right or wrong, that is another matter. Don't you do the same? How are you different from other posters? Maybe, you have become totally unsensitized against your own body odor? How should Muslim issues be addressed? With what kind of political correctness? Spell it out Sir?

Muslim moderates are simply jokers. Every time I hear their names, I feel like throwing up. They have failed to change Muslim minds for last fourteen hundred years. Lets not blame others for this cruel misery.

-SD

 

On Saturday, November 29, 2014 5:42 PM, "ANISUR RAHMAN anisur.rahman1@btinternet.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

The advantage of having this debate in public is that everybody - Hindus, Muslims, Christians, atheists, agnostics, pagans and so forth - can see what is going on in the minds of the key players and where they are coming from. 

Dr. Jiten Roy may spurt out his bigoted feelings on the pretext of having clear thinking and straight talking; whereas Dr. Kamal Das may feel that he knows everything there is to know about what is going on in the minds of one and half billion Muslims and gives a sanctimonious direction on the future course of action the majority of Muslims or at least moderate Muslims should take. 

But the central theme of this discourse is this - Confucius more than two and half millenia ago said: "He who knows not, knows not that he knows not, is imbecile, shun him". I will say no more about these two self-serving critiques analysing and reanalysing Muslim bahaviour perpetually.

- AR  

---

From: "Subimal Chakrabarty subimal@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 29 November 2014, 6:22
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] RE: ISIS is hell-bent to establish real Islamic Caliphate in the middle-East just like Prophet Muhammad did in the 7th century Medina.

 

Thanks. I can see your points. I hope Kamal Das also could spend some time to organize 
his thoughts first and then present it respectfully. All he does is make sweeping comments and boast his incoherent knowledge. 
Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 28, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

"Why should they not be given the freedom to rise above the literary meanings of a holy book and still be religious    by practicing a religion that has been hijacked by the fanatic militants? "-  S. Chakrabarty

People have given that relative freedom since the inception of Islam but it is like one step forward followed by two steps backward. It is the religious Mullahs who call the shorts. These people are so 'afraid' that they think Islam needs to be protected by any means. Anybody converts to an atheist or something else is a dead meat. So, freedom is not an issue.

ISIL has rather become very popular amongst many enlightened European Muslims. And that is not a fluke. The gullible Muslim moderates would pretend to fight the evils but they will surrender the bigger causes of Islam. That is why nothing has happened since PM death. That is why evil forces like ISIL, Boko-harams an d Talibans would be coming in many different flavors with more notoriety. And, moderates will chant the same mantra as these people being not true Muslims. Meanwhile, minorities will be converted or thrown out from many parts of the Muslim dominated countries. And, nobody can be blamed for those notoriety. A moderate would be sorry but he would not mind to live amongst those imbeciles as evidenced by so many cruel incidents and events. There goes his/her freedom and stance against his/her evil brethren. People like Malala can't go back to her own country but she is a great Muslim? I find this very ironic and maybe little self-serving (call it my sarcastic conspiracy theory) agenda from a different angle.

Yes, nobody can do anything about this deadly menace. I bet Nazrul knew that cruel fact when he was young and cognitively alert. Thank you. I stop here.

I bet, we are heading towards the elephant in the room.

-SD

 

 

On Friday, November 28, 2014 5:57 PM, "Subimal Chakrabarty subimal@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Nazrul was a Muslim by birth and name. He never converted to any other religion although it has been said that for a certain time period he became a Kali sadhak. Through one of his poems he expressed his desire to be buried by the side of a mosque. He was above religion. He was more a Bengali than a Muslim. He did not suffer from religious meanness. That's why he could so easily write beautiful kirtans in addition to naad, hamd, and gajal. He wrote much more Hindu songs than Islamic songs because of the higher demand for the former. 

My point was not to prove that Nazrul was a devout Muslim. He was a rebel against the use of religion as a tool of exploitation. He was aware that common people were religious and he must not do any thing that would make him isolated from people as o ne of his goals was to liberate the oppressed. That's what I wanted to say. Some one made a rude comment about Kerry. My question was if he would make the similar comment about Nazrul as he tried to glorify the prophet of Islam in his song. 

I will never ask Kamal Das this question as he is not worth debating with. He got mad when he heard that Rabindranath called Muhammad a great sage. He stopped so low that he attacked Rabindranath by saying that his writings were not free from spelling mistakes. He loves to attack some one out of context. As far as I remember he  was also mad when he came to know that Vivekananda praised the concept of equality in Islam. He accuses but cannot say on what point. 

That ISIS is following the true Koranic Islam i s now a favorite theory in certain quarters which include Islamophobiac communalists. The theory may be well founded or not---I don't know as my knowledge about the Koran is extremely limited. Also I don't care. My concern is with the Muslims in general who also treat them as true Muslims but do not endorse the activities of ISIS. Will it not be rude to tell them that they are half Muslims and in order to become true Koranic Muslims they have to follow ISIS word for word? Will this not be divisive and make fight against ISIS weak? Why should they not be given the freedom to rise above the literary meanings of a holy book and still be religious    by practicing a religion that has been hijacked by the fanatic militants? 

I have asked you few questions in a separate mail. I would be looking forward to hearing from you soon. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 27, 2014, at 8:00 PM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Does this song