Thank you Honest Voice for being strong, clear, resonant and irrefutable. You don't have to guess about Mr. Enayet's pidegree. His blatant support of Nizami confirms that he is a Jamati. As a worker, he is merely following Jamat's strategy of putting up a new face as followers of democracy and do everything to hide their pre-71 hideous faces as killers, rapists, looters, arsonists and foes of Bangladesh. Writing a letter to the Economist and getting it published is also an action envisaged in the current strategy of Jamate Islami. This is going to make American government support to Jamat a little more acceptable to American public who is questioning the Bush administration's enigmatic support to one kind of Islamists and war on another variety. The Economist is a reputable international magazine. Occasionally, they come up with significant in-depth report on Bangladesh. They can not pose to know nothing about the the role of Jamate Islami both before and after 1971. They also must be aware that, it is the CIA who redesigned Bangladesh by changing the essence of her secular constitution through killing of her key national leaders with the help of Pakistan, the perpetrators of Genocide on Bengalis of 1971. America needed the opium of communalism for their control of this part of the world for various needs of their foreign policy in South and Far East Asia. In order to secure the changed Muslim Bangla, the home of 'Moderate Muslims' so fondly called by Bush Administration, most trustworthy Bangladeshi collaborator of Pakistan, the Jamate ISlami was secretly resurrected and smuggled in along with ensuring the end of the ban on religion based politics imposed by new government of People's Republic of Bangladesh.
What Enayet, the neo-Rajakar, calls 'challange of Nizami' is actually the challenge of American Foreign Policy. If this resurgence of our 'Ekattor spirit' can continue for a few more months, even this American support behind Jamate Islami will evaporate. After all America is the Home of 'Liberty' and justice and can not fake blind for a long time.
Belal Beg
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:27:18 -0800
From: honestvoice2007@yahoo.com
Subject: Nizami's challange! From 1971 to 2007?
To: enayet_2000@yahoo.com
CC: akbar_50@hotmail.com; fa515375@skynet.be; BobXLE@aol.com; srbanunz@gmail.com; Santa.mustafa@hotmail.com; babu_asad@yahoo.com; Arahim.azad@gmail.com; begbelal@hotmail.com; sbguha@yahoo.com; notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com; khabor@yahoogroups.com; vinnomot@yahoogroups.com; Diagnose@yahoogroups.com
Dear Enayet,What I feel, you are potentially confused or one of the pro-jammat supporters those who try to divert the main issue deliberately. How do you look into the gravity of the two different crimes committed by an individual who killed your brother, raped your mother in front of you and an individual who stole your house? I think it is a matter of individual sense to differentiate the gravity of these crimes as mentioned.Thanks CT government for their initiatives (apparently) to put the criminals on trial those who have 'stole your house'. But, I am really wondering why people like you are so sceptical in the issue of trial of a group of people those who killed your father, brother, friends and raped your mother, sisters in front of you and burned your houses and forced you to take shelter in India and opposed the birth of Bangladesh and collaborated with Pakistani army?I also believe as you do "every person should face justice". But, of course including the people those who are still supporting and patronizing the criminals of 1971.Regards,Honest Voice
-----Original Message-----
From: Enayet Ullah [mailto:enayet_2000@yahoo.com]
Sent: dimanche 23 décembre 2007 14:40
To: notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com; khabor@yahoogroups.com; vinnomot@yahoogroups.com; Diagnose@yahoogroups.com
Cc: akbar_50@hotmail.com; fa515375@skynet.be; BobXLE@aol.com; srbanunz@gmail.com; Santa.mustafa@hotmail.com; babu_asad@yahoo.com; Arahim.azad@gmail.com; begbelal@hotmail.com; sbguha@yahoo.com
Subject: Nizami's challange! From 1971 to 2007?
Gopal,
Instead of accusing on flimsy account, let's have a trial of all criminals. If anyone found guilty, either Jamati or Al-Badr or Al-Shams or Awami, we should had prosecuted them all by now.
In any case, to stop your (crocodile?) tears, lets start a tribunal of all criminals, starting from 1971 till 2007. No one should escape the justice. Those who acted as a collaborator and those who committed atrocity & looted money from our national treasury should all face the court of Justice. There must be NO exception! And there is no need to hold any party liable for committing atrocity or treason, every person should face justice including Nizami, Hasina & Khaleda.
When we talk trial & justice, we should be fair to our motherland. Let's eradicate all evils!
--- gopalsengupta@aol.com wrote:
> Sir - The letter of Mr.Motiur Rahman Nizami of Jamaat-e-Islami
> published in the Economist on December 19th, 2007 ("_ Guilty at
> birth?_
>
(http://economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10254574)
> ", December 8th) again brought
> tears to my eyes and evoked growing sense of rage after reading the
> false and fabricated letter written by him. Indeed, the Pakistan army
> could not have committed heinous atrocities at such scale without the
> active help of Jamat - e - Islami and their Al-badr and Razakar war
> criminal slaves.
>
>
>
>
>
> Bangladesh became independent in December 1971, after a nine-month
> war that pitted Bengali-dominated East Pakistan against West Pakistan.
> The West's army, with it's appeal to Islamic unity, had the support of
> many of East Pakistan's fundamentalist parties. The most extreme of
> these was the Jamaat-e-Islami, whose student wing became the main
> source of a pro-army paramilitary body called Al Badr, which was led
> by Mr Nizami. It's members are alleged, among other atrocities, to
> have abducted and murdered dozens of senior journalists and
> academics.
> Frequent calls for war-crimes trials have been ignored. This time,
> the unelected government's hand may be forced by the new unity among
> the big parties, and by support for the demands among parts of the
> army. Many witnesses, and accused, have died. The head of the interim
> administration, Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed, has said that the government
> would welcome prosecutions initiated by private citizens. But
> citizens' groups insist that the state must act as prosecutor in
> crimes of such magnitude.
>
> The legal experts said reports and statements, which were published in
> the Daily Sangram, the official voice of Jamaat-e-Islami, during the
> liberation war of Bangladesh, about the activities of the
> anti-liberation forces, might be sufficient to try the collaborators
> of the Pakistan occupation forces. Other national and international
> newspapers published during the liberation war also ran news and
> photographs about the activities of the anti-liberation local forces,
> which are also admissible in courts according to the law, said the
> experts. Two cases are now in the court against Mr.
> Nizami and his associates
> for trial.
>
> On the other hand, Mr. Nizami through his letter created the 'eighth
> wonder of the world' by refusing his activities. A snake always
> remains a snake even though it sheds skin.
>
> Gopal Sengupta
>
>
> CANADA
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------
>
> The Economist thanks you for your letter, which will be edited if it
> is chosen for publication.
>
> We run a wider selection of letters in addition to those appearing in
> The Economist newspaper at "The inbox" on our website:
> _www.economist.com/debate/theinbox_
> (http://www.economist.com/debate/theinbox) .
>
> Letters published at "The inbox" carry the name of the writer, but no
> return address.
>
> Publication of a letter at "The inbox" in no way affects the
> likelihood that it will be published in The Economist newspaper.
>
> If you would prefer not to have your letter published please send an
> e-mail promptly to _letters@economist.com_
> (mailto:letters@economist.com) .
>
> The Economist's offices will be closed from December 19th to January
> 2nd.
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------
>
> Bangladesh's past
> SIR – Regarding your recent article on Bangladesh (â€Å"_Guilty at
> birth?_
>
(http://economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10254574)
> �, December
> 8th). The party I lead, Jamaat-e-Islami, strongly denies any link with
> the atrocities committed during the war of independence in 1971. It
> also denies any involvement whatsoever with the abduction and murder
> of journalists and academics. I would also point out that I was never
> a member of Al Badr nor did I ever lead that organisation.
> Furthermore, I ceased to become the head of Jamaat's student wing
> from October 1971 and did not hold any post in Jamaat until long
> after Bangladesh's liberation.
> Jamaat is a moderate Islamic party that believes in democracy and
> human rights and is strongly committed to upholding the rule of law.
> Jamaat's position has always been that if any allegations made by a
> future war-crimes tribunal against a member of Jamaat are proved to
> be true in a court of law, then we are ready to face the consequences.
> In the past 36 years, no one, not even the relatives of the victims'
> families, has taken any step to institute legal proceedings against
> the alleged perpetrators of war crimes.
> Motiur Rahman Nizami
> Jamaat-e-Islami
> Dhaka
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live. Get it now! __._,_.___
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___