Separating Northeast From India Can be a Response From Beijing- Suggests Chinese Blogger
-- On Tue, 3/22/11, Zoglul Husain <zoglul@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
The article contains both Indian and Chinese views on Arunachal (as the Indians call it) or Southern Tibet (as the Chinese call it). The article has also been published in Eurasia Review, as follows:
(http://www.eurasiareview.com/china-southern-tibet-arunachal-invaded-by-india-analysis-21032011/) on 21 March 2011.
The situation there, in my view, has gone past the phase of psywar, as the Indian mobilisation of troops has now reached more than 200,000. It is now eyeball to eyeball. From the chinese point of view the writer 'Zao An' has noted three options for China:
"(i) Maintain 'low-intensity war status quo' with India, (ii) Actually launch a 'low intensity war against India', which can be upgraded into a 'middle intensity war' and (iii) prepare for a protracted confrontation with India which may mean a division of India. Explaining the last mentioned, the Blog has revealed that it may involve China's cutting of India from its North Eastern parts along the Siliguri line, leading to creation of a new 'Eastern Hindustan State' and its seeking support for this purpose from Myanmar, Bangladesh etc."
It is clear from the above that Bangladesh will be dragged into the dispute, more likely directly than indirectly. We must observe and analyse the geo-strategic and geo-political developments and decide on our course of action and accordingly interact with the regional and global powers who are involved.
China: "Southern Tibet" (Arunachal) 'Invaded' by India; Separating Northeast From India Can be a Response From Beijing
"What we see therefore is an India which is getting aggressive with the sole purpose of defeating China, occupying more land and reestablishing a new great Hindustan!"
Full Article:
http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/%5Cpapers44%5Cpaper4390.html
__._,_.___
