I think the bone of contention for this argument is whether a predator assaults his victims once or twice? According to Prof. Das's theory, a second assault would make things totally kosher because the female victim probably initiates that encounter? All of a sudden a victim becomes a predator? I think the argument is pretty silly and stupid!
-SD
From: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Turkish Abortion Debate Renewed After Nevin Yildirim Beheads Alleged Rapist
-SD
"All great truths begin as blasphemies." GBS
From: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Turkish Abortion Debate Renewed After Nevin Yildirim Beheads Alleged Rapist
This is what I think. Love-making between two lovers may get affected without female cooperation. This has to do with love and attraction for each other. When female does not cooperate, love and attraction disappear from the scene, and male feels rejection, which may affect his psyche. But, it will not be applicable to a rape, where the male attacker is mentally in a different state of mind; he is looking for sex, nothing else. Jiten Roy --- On Wed, 9/12/12, Shah Deeldar <shahdeeldar@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
__._,_.___