Banner Advertiser

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

[mukto-mona] Fw: Very Important comment from a reader about Gonojagoron Moncho Leader .....


----- Forwarded Message -----
From: SyedAslam <syed.aslam3@gmail.com>
To: Khobor <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; chottala@yahoogroups.com; notun Bangladesh <notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:15 PM
Subject: Very Important comment from a reader about Gonojagoron Moncho Leader .....

Mr. Mohiuddin Anwar

Your statement about Imran Sarkar "Being a descendant of a known
Razakar he needs to know how he would feel if he was trying to hang his
own grandfather......" is maliciously lie and part of slanders
propagated by the supporters of the war criminals...

Read: ইমরানের দাদা রাজাকার ছিলেন কখনো শুনিনি: তারামন বিবি
http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2013-03-05/news/334172
ইমরান এইচ সরকারের দাদা খয়ের উদ্দিন একজন সৎ মানুষ ছিলেন। তিনি মুক্তিযুদ্ধের 
সময়ে সংগঠক হিসেবে কাজ করেছিলেন।' তিনি আরও বলেন, তাঁদের এলাকাটি মুক্তাঙ্গন 
হওয়ায় সেখানে কোনো রাজাকার ছিল না। হাজি খয়ের উদ্দিন রাজাকার ছিলেন না। 
প্রকৃত ধার্মিক ছিলেন।
মুক্তিযোদ্ধা তারামন বিবি বীর প্রতীক definitely has more credibility than most
of the rumor mongers & supporters of Jamaati criminals ...

You have said "BAL has misused this term Razakar to color its opponents............ "
in that case just tell us who was the mastermind behind organizing
the Al-bodor Bahini ?  

Just explain, why Jamaate Islami was the only political party that 
had it's own's armed gestapo wing Albodor Bahini actively aiding
and abetting the Pak Army in the killing fields of occupied 
Bangladesh in 1971 !!!!!

Also, explain why the name of Islami Chattro Sangho's name
was changed to Islami Chattro Shibir when it resurfaced in 
Bangladesh during late ninteen seventies !!!!!

[ Interestingly enough, BNP stalwart Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir's father 
Mirza Ruhul Amin (Chokha Mia), was a member of Thakurgaon Peace 
Committee. See: 
http://warcriminalsbd.org/list/rajakars-of-rajshahi-division-3/
that mentions
Rajakars of Rajshahi Division 3 : .....District: Dinajpur
710. Rajakar Mirza Ruhul Amin ..........  ]

"মির্জা ফখরুল ইসলামের বাবা চোখা মিয়া ছিলেন স্বাধীনতা বিরোধী রাজাকার। মুক্তিযুদ্ধের সময় 
বাংলাদেশের বিরুদ্ধে পাকিস্তানের পক্ষে যথেষ্ঠ পরিশ্রম করেছেন! সে জন্যে হয়তো মির্জা ফখরুলেরও 
মুক্তিযুদ্ধে যাওয়া হয়নি! মুক্তিযুদ্ধের সময় অবশ্য বাংলাদেশের অনেক মুক্তিযোদ্ধার পিতা মুসলিম 
লীগার তথা পাকিস্তানের পক্ষে ছিলেন। এমন পিতার বিরুদ্ধে বিদ্রোহ ঘোষণা করেই তাদের ছেলেরা 
যুদ্ধে  গেছেন। শত্রুপক্ষে থাকা অথবা সক্রিয় থাকা অনেক পিতা এমন অনেক স্বাধীনতাকামী সন্তানদের
প্রাণ দিয়েছেন। ফখরুল ইসলামের যুদ্ধে না যাবার প্রকৃত কাহিনী আমরা জানিনা। ......"
It may be mentioned here that, Fakhrul's father Mirza Ruhul Amin 
AKA Chokha Mia later joined the cabinet of H M Ershad as the land 
minister.... obviously, consistent with his 1971 activities].

Related:
মানবতাবিরোধী অপরাধের বিচাররাজাকার-আলবদর বাহিনী গড়ার হোতা গোলাম আযম
http://www.kalerkantho.com/?view=details&type=gold&data=Bank&pub_no=794&cat_id=1&menu_id=14&news_type_id=1&index=0&archiev=yes&arch_date=16-02-2012
বুদ্ধিজীবীদের হত্যা করেছে 'জামায়াতি দুর্বৃত্তরাই'
মিজানুর রহমান খান, ওয়াশিংটন ডিসি থেকে | তারিখ: ১৪-১২-২০১২


Ghulam Azam symbol of vicious crimes (Updated)
Tue, 19/02/2013 - 8:07pm | by Hisham Bin Mustafa
Dhaka, Feb 19 (Priyo.com): Jamaat-e-Islami leader, Ghulam Azam, appeared as a symbol of vicious crimes during the Liberation War in 1971, a prosecutor on Tuesday told the International Crimes Tribunal-1.






http://news.priyo.com/2013/02/19/ghulam-azam-symbol-vicious-crimes-updated-67594.html


যুক্তি উপস্থাপনকালে রাষ্ট্রপক্ষ

সহযোগী বাহিনীগুলোর ওপর গোলাম আযমের প্রত্যক্ষ নিয়ন্ত্রণ ছিল
নিজস্ব প্রতিবেদক | তারিখ: ১৯-০২-২০১৩

Also Read:

Auxiliary Forces Against Freedom Fighters

Ghulam Azam directly controlled their drives

Prosecution says in closing arguments

The prosecution yesterday explained before the International Crimes Tribunal-1 the status of war crimes accused Ghulam Azam and how he exercised power to drive auxiliary forces against the freedom fighters during the Liberation War.
  • Golam Azam' is the Eichmann of Bangladesh .....
  • Golam Azam is the Gaddere Azam of our time....
  • Golam Azam collaborated with a foreign occupation army .....
  • Golam Azam is the twentieth century Mir Zafor Ali Khan of Bangladesh ....   
  • Golam Azam is worse than Mir Zafor in many sense ,,,,,
  • Golam Azam with his Jamaate Islami party vis-a-vis Islami Chattro Sangho not only betrayed our nation (emerging Bangladesh), but aided and  abetted the Genocide & Mass-rapes of the Yahia Regime ....
  • Golam Azam was elected unopposed as an MNA (special November 1971 byelection ) with the  blessings of General Aga Mohammad Yahia Khan ......[But as we know, man proposes Allah Subhana Wa Tala disposes ,,,,, Gaddere Azam Golam Azam's dream never came true.  Bangladesh emerged as an Independent Republic ...... ]
  • Golam Azam created an organization named Purbo Pakistan Punoruddhar Committee. Golam Azam continued his idiotic & treacherous efforts to nullify &stop the recognition of Bangladesh [Bangladesh Na Monjoor ]. Again, that effort too became futile ........


যুদ্ধাপরাধের বিচার :  ট্রাইব্যুনাল গঠনের ইতিকথা 






Also Read:
যুদ্ধাপরাধের বিচার : 
বাচ্চু রাজাকারের বিরুদ্ধে রায় কার্যকর চায় শহীদ পরিবার


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Mohiuddin Anwar <mohiuddin@netzero.net> wrote:
There is nothing wrong of being the grandson of a Razakar. But Mr. Sarkar is just not any person. He has become a symbol of prosecuting Razakars. He is the leader of Gonojagron Moncho. The singly focused aim of this movement
happens to be such that it wants death sentence for all Razakars â€" a slogan so repeatedly circulated and broadcast by the media. Being a descendant of a known Razakar he needs to know how he would feel if he was trying to hang his
own grandfather.
 
BAL has misused this term Razakar to color its opponents. This has made the situation worse. Some BAL supporters had wrongly accused Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir’s father of being a Razakar to malign Mr. Alamgir. Under these backdrops
Mr. Sarkar’s family connection would definitely be called to question for the sake of fairness.
 
The bottom line is that he needs to understand the difference between prosecution and persecution. The indiscriminate use of the slogans that he led to perpetuate created a confused and wrong expectation among young people who fail to realize that all Razakars cannot be put on trial just because they were Razakars! At the same time all Razakars would not get death sentence just because they were Razakars.
 
Criminals are criminals irrespective of their identity â€" a principle not being followed properly by BAL administration. The trial process at the ICT is flawed and transparency is questionable. These had been pointed out by more than one International entities. It is clear that ICT is politically motivated and has become quite controversial because it was
created without having a prior national political consensus to dispel any misconception about the motives behind the trials.