I always say that religious beliefs even within a given religion vary. By this I mean that there are various levels of beliefs. A believer should aim at reaching the highest level. I am sure there are believers with the broader Muslim community who will not finance idolatry. We have to remember that helping Hindus and financing their idolatry are not the same thing. I am not sure what Khaleda Zia wants the Hindus to do with the money----rebuild the deities or buy food and medicine?
From: QR <qrahman@netscape.net>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Khaleda Zia is not muslim, rather a NASTIK
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Khaleda Zia is not muslim, rather a NASTIK
According to rules of Islam, a muslim is not allowed to donate other religions. By donating money to the hindu-temple, Khaleda Zia proved that she is not a muslim. She is a NASTIK helself!
Regards,
Fatema Hasan
Regards,
Fatema Hasan
Kindly don't abuse our religion to support your political views.
Shalom!
-----Original Message----- From: fatemah092 <fatemah092@yahoo.com> To: mukto-mona <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sun, Mar 17, 2013 1:31 am Subject: [mukto-mona] Khaleda Zia is not muslim, rather a NASTIK
According to rules of Islam, a muslim is not allowed to donate other religions. By donating money to the hindu-temple, Khaleda Zia proved that she is not a muslim. She is a NASTIK helself!
Regards,
Fatema Hasan
Regards,
Fatema Hasan
__._,_.___