Before making "wise" comments, one should study how political events occur, who provide funds and what repercussions these events create? Bhasani's actions led to the extinction of his political party. About seven decades earlier a man named Jogen Mandal had great role in the creation of East Pakistan, read history to find out what happened to him and his power base.
Sent from my iPad
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 30, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Mohammad Mushrafi mushrafi@hotmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
No one expect all will be angels in politics. The human being do mistakes. When time changes the actions of the past can be interpreted in a critical way. But above all the intention of the actions must be judged. One can be an expert sitting in the audience gallery to criticise the players. But the criticizer would be the least capable to handle the game.
But all will probably agree that there were/are politicians and intellectuals in every nation those who are power grabby, shrewd and with evil intentions. Some of them do it knowingly (devils) and some of them unknowingly (because of their blind convictions).
From: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 08:41:28 +0600
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] কোথায় বুদ্ধিজীবিরা
Thus Chakrabarty and Mushrafi flock together in support of a devious and dubious Mawlana Bhasani who lacked formal education, was not even a graduated mawlana, learned Arabic only by rote of the holy Quran. He hailed from Serajganj, left home after stealing a cow from his peasant father who insisted on his attention to formal education, and ultimately got included in the pay roll of Ispahani as a Muslim League cadre before the partition of India. He was an opportunist as always. From "Don't disturb Ayub" to "Kick the ballot box" policies he adopted, he proved his role as a B-team leader to the ruling oligarchy in Pakistan. As he was denied a role after the military crackdown, he became subversive and remained so till his end.
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 28, 2015, at 9:35 PM, ANISUR RAHMAN anisur.rahman1@btinternet.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I said Bangladeshis are, in general, communal because in the olden days we could not tolerate the 'Biharis' and the Hindus. After independence we got rid of the Biharis, but cannot tolerate the Hindus and now there are rumblings that the Ahmadis, Shias and other non-Sunnis are to be got rid of. Aren't these blatant signs of communalism? How nice a country could have been without such sectarianism and communalism!And as regards selfishness, it goes without saying that almost everybody in the Indian subcontinent (India, Pakistan and Bangladesh) is selfish. There are, of course, some exceptions. However, among this selfish genre, the religious people are more selfish that others. The main reason is that the religious people have to spend money in the name of God ('kurbani', 'jakat', 'Hajj' etc) on top of the State taxes and quite often they acquire such extra money by resorting to all sorts of illegal means.- AR
From: "Subimal Chakrabarty subimal@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 28 March 2015, 1:35
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] কোথায় বুদ্ধিজীবিরা
Personally I have huge respect for Bhasani. I don't see when he betrayed common people. He was always ahead in every progressive movement. If he were alive, he would have alliance with Jamaat-Islami! Alliance in what sense? The kind of alliance BNP has? I doubt. The kind of invisible alliance sometimes AL had or has? Might be, but as a strategy in a democratic movement.Bangladeshis are extremely communal and selfish! I cannot quite agree with Dr. Rahman. It is a big topic.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 27, 2015, at 4:28 AM, ANISUR RAHMAN anisur.rahman1@btinternet.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Bangladeshis are extremely communal and selfish. A race or country like this has a problem.- A Rahman
From: "Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 26 March 2015, 13:41
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] কোথায় বুদ্ধিজীবিরা
Bhasani was not the man that people try to portray him as he was. If he were alive, I bet, the man would would have had an alliance with the Jamatis. Bluntly put, he was an erratic individual with too many contradictions. I am not sure what he was really standing or fighting for?And, for Avijit, I do not think Bangladeshis really care much about him. He is just another name and people are already openly justifying his gruesome murder. That is our reality in Bangladesh. And it is not going to change anytime soon.
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 8:59 AM, "Sankar Ray sankar.ray@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
আজ কেঊ অভিজিতের কথা মনে করলেন না। স্বাধীন নাংলাদেশের জন্ম ধর্মনিরপেক্ষতা ও পূর্ণ বাক স্বাধীনতার শর্তে ।অভিজিতের জন্ম সেই বাংলাদেশের প্রথম বর্ষে , যিনি আজীবন কায়মনোবাক্যে সেই শর্তে দায়বদ্ধ ছিলেন এবং সেই দায়বদ্ধতার জন্যেই প্রাণ দিতে হ'ল, শহীদত্ব বরণ করতে হ'ল, যার আদৌ প্রয়োজন ছিল না। আজ তারা মিউজিক-এ শাহবাগ নিয়ে গান লেখা হ'ল, ভাল কথা । অভিজিতের আত্নবলিদান নিয়ে এত কবিতা লেখা হ'ল, তার থেখে একটা গান হতে পারত না? তারা মিউজিক-এ অভিজিতের নামও উচ্চারণ করা হ'ল না। এক মুসলমান বন্ধুও প্রশ্ন তুললেন ,"শাহবাগের নেতারা তো অভিজিত নিয়ে পথে নামলেন না। হিন্দু বলে কি? " মনে পড়ছে, মৌলানা ভাসানীর এক ন্যক্কারজনক প্রকাশ্য মন্তব্য যে বাংলাদেশের ক মিউনিস্ট পার্টির সাধারণ সম্পাদক আব্দুস সামাদের আসল নাম বারীন দত্ত। এই ভাসানী ফরাক্কা বাঁদের বিরুদ্ধে আন্দোলনে নামার আগে নমাজ পড়ার আহ্বান জানিয়েছিলেন। সুতরাং বামগ্লাদেস গঠনের শর্ত ভেঙেছিলেন জনপ্রিয় নেতা ভাসানী। অভিজিতের হত্যার বীজ অনেক আগেই পোঁতা হয়েছিল ।আজ মনটা তেমন ভাল নেই
__._,_.___
