From: SAHANNAN [mailto:sahannan@sonarbangladesh.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 6:53 AM
To: 'hkbadal@gmail.com'
Subject: Oxfam says Billionaires' fortunes hinder poverty fight: Unjust Capitalism is the root cause--editorial
Oxfam says Billionaires' fortunes hinder poverty fight: Unjust Capitalism is the root cause
The Guardian Online has reported that The vast fortunes made by the world's richest 100 billionaires is driving up inequality and hindering the world's ability to tackle poverty, according to Oxfam.The charity said the accumulation of wealth and income on an unprecedented scale, often at the expense of secure jobs and decent wages for the poorest, undermined the ability of people who survive on aid or low wages to improve their situation and escape poverty.Oxfam said the world's poorest could be lifted out of poverty several times over should the richest 100 billionaires give away the money they made last year.Without pointing a finger at individuals, the charity argued that the $240b (£150b) net income amassed in 2012 by the richest 100 billionaires would be enough to make extreme poverty history four times over.
It is rare for charities to attack the wealthy, who are usually regarded as a source of funding. Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are among a group of 40 US billionaires who have pledged much of their wealth to aid projects, but there is little detail about the level of their annual donations. Their actions have also not been matched by Russian, Middle Eastern or Chinese billionaires.In the report, The Cost of Inequality: How Wealth and Income Extremes Hurt Us All, published before the World Economic Forum in Davos next week, the charity calls on world leaders to curb income extremes and commit to reducing inequality to at least 1990 levels.The report found that the richest 1 percent had increased their incomes by 60 percent in the past 20 years, with the financial crisis accelerating rather than slowing the process.
Barbara Stocking, Oxfam's chief executive, said extreme wealth was "economically inefficient, politically corrosive, socially divisive and environmentally destructive".She pointed to studies that show countries have suffered low levels of investment and growth as workers are forced to survive on a smaller share of total incomes.She said: "We can no longer pretend that the creation of wealth for a few will inevitably benefit the many , too often the reverse is true."The report said the issue affected all parts of the world. "In the UK inequality is rapidly returning to levels not seen since the time of Charles Dickens. In China the top 10 percent now take home nearly 60 percent of the income. Chinese inequality levels are now similar to those in South Africa, which is now the most unequal country on Earth and significantly more unequal than at the end of apartheid."
In the US, the share of national income going to the top 1 percent has doubled since 1980 from 10 to 20 percent, the report says. For the top 0.01 percent the share of national income is above levels last seen in the 1920s.The World Bank and International Monetary Fund have argued that extreme income inequality undermines growth and both organisations have attempted to tie their loans to programmes that limit the growth of inequality.Members of the richest 1 percent are estimated to use as much as 10,000 times more carbon than the average US citizen.Oxfam said world leaders should learn from countries such as Brazil that had grown rapidly while reducing inequality.Stocking said: "We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990."She said closing tax havens, which the Tax Justice Network says hold as much as $31 trillion, or as much as a third of all global wealth, could yield an additional $189b (£118b) in additional tax revenues.
It is a terrible finding.Good that it has been released.Oxfam has not discussed the root cause of this problem which is profit worshipping capitalism without caring for justice.Worship of market system is not the solution.Limitation of market system has to be understood.Market system is good if it is subjected to serious supervision with the aim of reducing income inequality and reducing concentration of wealth.What we have said is the essence of Islamic or a morality based economic system.
