Sometimes you do not need "Studies" or research to know plain facts. Ancestor of Raj Kapoor (Famous Indian film hero) and Tamil actor Komol Hasan are not the same. They are different in appearance.
However we are all in "Human race" and we have more common than our differences. Still Linguists and historians have solid proof of migrants in ancient India. Click on the link below to read about it.
Indo-Aryan migration
....................................Linguistic evidence
Language
Diversity
Puranas
From: Sudhir-Architect <ar_sudhirkumar@yahoo.com>
To: mukto-mona <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, Feb 8, 2014 10:36 pm
Subject: [mukto-mona] Aryan Invasion-History or Politics? [All Indians have the same genes]
Aryan Invasion — History or Politics?
No foreign Genes or DNA entered India after 6000BC: Study[Myth Busted]
--
Thanks & Regards,
Sudhir Srinivasan
B.Arch, MSc.CPM, Dip.ID, Dip.CAD, Dip.PM, Dip.LD
| Architect |
__._,_.___
****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration:
Call For Articles:
http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68
http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585
****************************************************
VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/
****************************************************
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
-Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
Monday, February 10, 2014
Re: [mukto-mona] Aryan Invasion-History or Politics? [All Indians have the same genes]
Contemporary claims of Indo-Aryan migrations are drawn from linguistic,[1] literary, cultural, archaeological and genetic[2] sources.
Accumulated linguistic evidence points to the Indo-Aryan languages as intrusive into South Asia, some time in the 2nd millennium BC. The language of the Rigveda, the earliest stratum of Vedic Sanskrit, is assigned to about 1500–1200 BC.[10]
According to the linguistic center of gravity principle, the most likely point of origin of a language family is in the area of its greatest diversity.[11] By this criterion, India, home to only a single branch of the Indo-European language family (i. e., Indo-Aryan), is an exceedingly unlikely candidate for the Indo-European homeland, compared to Central-Eastern Europe, for example, which is home to the Italic, Venetic, Illyrian, Albanian, Germanic, Baltic, Slavic, Thracian and Greek branches of Indo-European.[12]
Both mainstream Urheimat solutions locate the Proto-Indo-European homeland in the vicinity of the Black Sea.[13]
.................................................................................................................
Rig veda
The Rigveda is by far the most archaic testimony of Vedic Sanskrit. Bryant suggests that the Rigveda represents a pastoral or nomadic, mobile culture,[7] centered on the Indo-Iranian Soma cult and fire worship. The purpose of hymns of the Rigveda is ritualistic, not historiographical or ethnographical, and any information about the way of life or the habitat of their authors is incidental and philologically extrapolated from the context.[note 4] Nevertheless, Rigvedic data must be used, cautiously, as they are the earliest available textual evidence from India.
.................................................................................................................................
The Puranas record that Yayati left Prayag (confluence of the Ganges & Yamuna) and conquered the region of Sapta Sindhu.[46] His five sons Yadu, Druhyu, Puru, Anu and Turvashu correspond to the main tribes of the Rigveda.
The Puranas also record that the Druhyus were driven out of the land of the seven rivers by Mandhatr and that their next king Gandhara settled in a north-western region which became known as Gandhara. The sons of the later Druhyu king Pracetas are supposed by some to have 'migrated' to the region north of Afghanistan though the Puranic texts only speak of an "adjacent" settlement.[47][48]
There are too many solid evidences for the migration theory. So couple of "Experts" may try to fit a square peg in a circle but sad fact is this new theory does not match with evidences.
Shalom!
-----Original Message-----
All Indians have the same genes
It is established through genomic analyses that people in north India were no different from those in the south and that all shared the same genetic lineage . It also established that people of north and south were part of the same culture. former CCMB director Lalji Singh and two US researchers analyzed over 500,000 genetic markers across diverse groups, including the traditional "upper" /" lower" castes and tribal groups and proved that there was no difference between tribal populations and castes.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-01-01/special-report/30578..749_1_genetic-mutation-disease-population
By Dr. N.S. Rajaram
Aryans: race or culture?
The evidence of science now points to two basic conclusions: first, there was no Aryan invasion, and second, the Rigvedic people were already established in India no later than 4000 BCE. How are we then to account for the continued presence of the Aryan invasion version of history in history books and encyclopedias even today?
A paper published on American Journal of Human Genetics exposes the famous lie that
europeans systematically planted into Indian brains : Aryan Invasion/Migration theory. According
to the research Dr Gyaneshwer Chaubey, Estonian Bio centre, Tartu, Estonia "We have proved
that people all over India have common genetic traits and origin. All Indians have the
same DNA structure. No foreign genes or DNA has entered the Indian mainstream in the last
60,000 years,"
Dr Chaubey had already proved in 2009 that Aryan migration is a false theory just made to
divide Indians. He says "The decoding of human genome and other advances in this area help
us in unravelling the ancestry in 60,000 years"
If we think straight, we do not need any genetical science to prove that Aryan invasion is a false
theory. None of our Vedic scriptures gives a direct information about this theory and also the
Vedas can be still older than 5th century BC. India was eternally an Aryan nation, Aryan only
means Noble. Even Ravana, who is an iconic figure for Dravidian parties, was a Brahmin.
http://www.newsofdelhi.com/society-religions/no-foreign-genes-or-dna-entered-india-after-60000-bc-study
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional