Banner Advertiser

Saturday, July 20, 2013

RE: [mukto-mona] Freedom of speech when faced with tyrannical expression



Mr.Jiten Roy,


I was really shocked to hear the verdict on Golam Azan as he is the mastermind behind all organized killing and bangaleee annihilations done in 1971. He was given 90 years jail instead of capital punishment , with preference to  his older ages. In 1971, we were attacked by Golam Azam's gangs who believe in Islam and we were then protected by the same community in 1971. Problem lies with the teaching of religion. That is why I mentioned some name of person bearing the same community who really showed us human behaviour as I behave to human beings in every time.

We got our independence with a short period of time.  After liberation , allies of Golam Azam were given protection by the freedom fighters, either from the blood relation  or in exchange of  material benefit. And at the same time , Tajuddin , second in command of Bangabandhu was politically kept inactive. Tajuddin, if in active in politics,  can align party with a secular characteristics.   Party did not take proper measure to abolish culturally  communal  forces inside the  party   and some acts of party instead helped them to flourish. I know Awami league internally, when Awamai league in power , two will be given preferences, one is Madrasha and another one is army. And end result of Madrasha is to strengthen the hand of Jamat or Hepajot.  Awami league will not get single vote from them. Mosque and Military have no good example for our secular politics.

Please read the link:

http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=13&dd=2013-07-19&ni=142816


http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=13&dd=2013-07-20&ni=142952


http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=16&dd=2013-07-21&ni=143075


All problems lies with the hypocrisy of Awami league leadership.  This is the dual nature of Awami league's leadership to dig their own graves many times in history. Personally I know them that some of my friends know me. I might not be good narrator so you and some readers might be confused. I believe in compassion and loving kindness and try to defend truth in every time without considering colours, race and religions. I am not coward , and only coward can hide their own name and only clandestine mindset can have doubt to others.

Intellect without wisdom is curse.


Best regards to you.


Asoke Bose 



To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
From: jnrsr53@yahoo.com
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 18:56:54 -0700
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Freedom of speech when faced with tyrannical expression

 

Mr. Bose,

The problem is that - most of us do not understand your sarcasm. You are still a mystery to me. Your viewpoints contain conflicting thoughts.
For example, when you were talking about Golam Azam, you were also talking about a Muslim family, who sheltered your family during the war. These two thoughts should not appear together. Such talks will only confuse readers. I still do not know your position on Golam Azam, and his verdict.

You should know that tyrannical expressions are defended by freedom of speech.

Jiten Roy




From: Asoke Bose <anjbose@hotmail.com>
To: "khabor@yahoogroups.com" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: Shafikur <srbanunz@gmail.com>; "akhtarudduza@gmail.com" <akhtarudduza@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 7:30 PM
Subject: [mukto-mona] Freedom of speech when faced with tyrannical expression

 

As I understand that we are using free thinking forum where expression will be vibrant and talk will be full of humour or very serious or sarcastic. When we find  forceful and tyrannical attitude among us then it is very nice to say the person to use your tyrannical weapon and abolish the free thinker. As we have seen the democracies have long grappled with the issue of the limits, if any, to place on the expression of ideas and beliefs. The dilemma dates back at least to ancient Greece, when the Athenians, who cherished individual freedom, nevertheless prosecuted Socrates for his teachings, claiming that he had corrupted young people and insulted the gods. I am very little in compare to great Socrates.


Quote :"Freedom of speech is the political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas using one's body and property to anyone who is willing to receive them. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, as with libel, slander, obscenity, sedition (including, for example inciting ethnic hatred), copyright violation, revelation of information that is classified or otherwise."





__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___