As a criminal Gholam Azam is comparable to his guru Mowdudi who was given death sentence for instigating communal riots against the Ahmadias.
Sent from my iPhone
You should read your first post and think through how it should be perceived by readers? If I am not mistaken, it felt like you tried to justify Azam's crimes with our politicians' behavior and Taj being sidelined during Mujib's time. In addition, we did not prolong our struggle little longer to get rid of our political weeds? OK, if that was not your intention, that is truly great. Thank you.
So, why talk about the nature of the crimes? How that relates to your first post?
-SD"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss
From: Asoke Bose <anjbose@hotmail.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>; "khabor@yahoogroups.com" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: Shafikur <srbanunz@gmail.com>; "akhtarudduza@gmail.com" <akhtarudduza@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 8:22 PM
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!
Please do not relate crime of Golam Azam and his allies with other criminals as two are opposite in nature. Please try to understand the fundamental differences between these two concept of crimes.Crime of Golam Azam and his followers fall under this category:In 1945, the United States and other Allies developed the Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis and Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT), sitting at Nuremberg, which contained the following definition of crimes against humanity in Article 6(c):"Crimes against humanity: murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against civilian populations, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated."Golam Azam and his allies did the above mentioned crimes in 1971.Crime as we are noticing in a society falls under the following category:Legally, crimes usually are defined as acts or omissions forbidden by law that canbe punished by imprisonment and/or fine. Murder, robbery, burglary, rape, drunken driving, child neglect, and failure to pay your taxes all are common examples. This conception of crime explains the wide variety of criminal activity and the factthat individuals tend not to specialize in one type of crime. It also is consistent with thewell-established tendency of people to be consistent over long periods of time in the frequency and severity of crimes they commit. Even executives who commit white collar crimes probably are more impulsive, self-centred, and indifferent to the suffering of others than those who do not take advantage of similar opportunities.N:B: I have source for above mentioned writings.Asoke
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com; khabor@yahoogroups.com
CC: akhtarudduza@gmail.com; srbanunz@gmail.com; bangladesh-progressives@googlegroups.com
From: shahdeeldar@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:13:44 -0700
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!
Point taken and yet, I think you should not justify Ghulam Azam's criminality because Awamis and BNP cadres have been behaving very poorly. The old habit would not go away that easily. Even, a prolonged struggle would not have created a perfect harmonious society as evidenced by other countries' freedom struggles. That is a pure illusion. We have a religious fault line that has been apparent for long time and it is not going to go away any time soon. If that was not there, people would have invented something different like Shia-Sunni problem. That is our damn nature!-SD"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss
From: Asoke Bose <anjbose@hotmail.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>; "khabor@yahoogroups.com" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: "akhtarudduza@gmail.com" <akhtarudduza@gmail.com>; Shafikur <srbanunz@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:57 PM
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!
I appreciate all of our respected friends who had given valued comments regarding my notorious caption. My caption has explanatory sign and in my comments I mentioned under Golam Azam's guidance, Pakistani army launched genocide against us in 1971. I lost my brother for this cause. In no way I do not expect Golam Azam, for his age consideration got special preference from judiciary.I do not want my reader's confusion with regard to my caption and in no way I can give a praiseworthy applause from my heart to Golam Azam ,a notorious culprits in our time.Regards to all.Asoke Bose
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
CC: bangladesh-progressives@googlegroups.com
From: shahdeeldar@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:41:16 -0700
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!
The man is not only misguided but totally demented to justify a massive genocide in the name of pure Muslim blood. No, it was not a racial cleansing, it was a genocide with ethnic cleansing. And, that is considered as a crime against humanity. Can anybody show this @ss the door?
-SD"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss
From: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!
Mr. Bose is severely misguided in his reasoning. I am not sure how he could up with a conclusion that Golam Azam did not do anything wrong even after he has been found guilty of all heinous charges. In my view, Golam Azam is still causing death and destruction every day as people keep on dying on the street in protest of his verdict.I can understand political deal between Awami League and Jamati leaders, which may save some convicted Jamati leaders' lives. What I can't understand is - why all those fools are dying every day on the street, fighting one another. What are they achieving with their ultimate sacrifice? They are saving lives of some convicted killers at the cost of their own lives. Does that make sense to anyone? These are the dumbest fools in the society, always ready to be exploited.
