You have jumped to a conclusion which is wrong. I neither misunderstood nor tried to understand Mr. Bose's post. Initially I ignored it and did not make any comment on it. Re-read my response below which happens to be my first response on the debate. Now read my new response that I sent as my reaction to Bose's latest post:
"I don't understand what point Mr. Bose is trying to make. Has any one in the forum said that crimes of Gholam Azam are comparable to the crimes am committed by other criminals? Gholam Azam is a criminal of the highest order.
Sent from my iPhone
Please do not relate crime of Golam Azam and his allies with other criminals as two are opposite in nature. Please try to understand the fundamental differences between these two concept of crimes.Crime of Golam Azam and his followers fall under this category:In 1945, the United States and other Allies developed the Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis and Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT), sitting at Nuremberg, which contained the following definition of crimes against humanity in Article 6(c):"Crimes against humanity: murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against civilian populations, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated."Golam Azam and his allies did the above mentioned crimes in 1971.Crime as we are noticing in a society falls under the following category:Legally, crimes usually are defined as acts or omissions forbidden by law that canbe punished by imprisonment and/or fine. Murder, robbery, burglary, rape, drunken driving, child neglect, and failure to pay your taxes all are common examples. This conception of crime explains the wide variety of criminal activity and the factthat individuals tend not to specialize in one type of crime. It also is consistent with thewell-established tendency of people to be consistent over long periods of time in the frequency and severity of crimes they commit. Even executives who commit white collar crimes probably are more impulsive, self-centred, and indifferent to the suffering of others than those who do not take advantage of similar opportunities.N:B: I have source for above mentioned writings.Asoke"
