Sir
May I ask you to give honest opinion on the following? I am really curious.
- Should Ahmadiyans in Bangladesh be declared non-Muslims?
- Are Shiites on wrong track as far as Islam practiced by Sunnis concerned?
From: S A Hannan <sahannan@sonarbangladesh.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 3:01 AM
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Re: The sprit of Bangalee nationalism?
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 3:01 AM
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Re: The sprit of Bangalee nationalism?
This is not fairy are diluting the substance of the argument by some erratic actions of a section.
Shah Abdul Hannan.
From: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com [mailto: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jiten Roy
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 8:33 AM
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Re: The sprit of Bangalee nationalism?
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 8:33 AM
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Re: The sprit of Bangalee nationalism?
Mr. Hannan, Yes, religious bond is so strong that hundreds of innocent Muslims in Pakistan are dying regularly in bomb attaks by Muslims with strong religious convictions. How is that religous bond working in Pakistan ? Jiten Roy --- On Tue, 9/27/11, S A Hannan <sahannan@sonarbangladesh.com> wrote: From: S A Hannan <sahannan@sonarbangladesh.com> Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Re: The sprit of Bangalee nationalism? To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2011, 7:48 PM Mr Shubimol Chakrabarty, yes, religion is the strongest bond of nationhood compared to other bonds .Mr Jinnah said that Muslim majority areas should form independent state and Hindu majority areas of subcontinent should form another state and in both states minorities would remain there with all human rights. Shah Abdul Hannan From: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com [mailto: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of subimal chakrabarty Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 7:17 AM To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Re: The sprit of Bangalee nationalism? Pretty funny! What kind of statement is this? What about the bondage between Muslims and Hindus of Bangladesh? Is it "thin"? Do they belong to "Bangladeshi jati"? Do Hindus of West Bengal and Muslims of West Bengal belong to "Indian jati"? Is it "thin" or "thick"? I think the purpose of Mr. Hannan's statement is to fish in the troubled waters. He is thinking more in terms of religious divide. This reminds me of Jinnah's Two-Nation Theory. Mr. Hannan seems to be talking in the same line. According to Jinnah all the Indian Hindus constituted one nation and all the Indian Muslims constituted another nation. He forgot about other religious groups. Pretty funny! Mr. Hannan should recognize that religion is only one element (it may even be absent) in the structure of a nation. Hindu majority India and Hindu majority Nepal did not form one nation. All the Christian dominated countries in Europe did not form one nation. From: S A Hannan <sahannan@sonarbangladesh.com> To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 10:46 AM Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Re: The sprit of Bangalee nationalism? There is no Bangalee Jati as there is no Gujrati jati or Bihari jati or punjabi Jati Bond of unity of bangla speaking Muslims of Bangladesh and Banglaspeaking Hindus of West bengal is very thin.They belong to Bangladeshi jati or Indian jati respectively. For becoming jati you require much stronger bond. Shah Abdul hannan From: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com [mailto: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jiten Roy Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 8:44 AM To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Re: The sprit of Bangalee nationalism?
|
__._,_.___