Banner Advertiser

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

[ALOCHONA] UP chairmen demand freedom from MPs

UP chairmen demand freedom from MPs
Courtesy New Age 8/4/09

 

The Bangladesh Upazila Parishad Association, an association of the elected chairmen of the local government bodies, at a meeting on Tuesday observed that strong and functioning Upazila Parishads would not be possible under the new law passed by the parliament on Monday.
   The newly-elected upazila parishad chairmen urged Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to drop certain provisions of the Upazila Parishad (Repealed Act Re-Introduction and Amendment) Act, which gives the Members of Parliament the authority to control the decisions taken and work done by the parishads.
   The coordinator of the BUPA, Harun-ur-Rashid Hawladar, also the chairman of Dumki in Patuakhali, after the meeting told New Age that they would go for an action programme if Hasina does not pay their demands any heed and retains the questionable provisions which robs them of freedom and autonomy.
   The parliament on Monday unanimously passed the Upazila Parishad (Repealed Act Re-Introduction and Amendment) Bill, making it mandatory for the upazila parishads to consult the lawmakers as well as to accept their recommendations while making plans for development in their constituencies.
   Several political parties on Tuesday observed that the upazila parishad bill which was passed with provisions giving lawmakers sweeping authority over the parishads in their constituencies, would make the local bodies weaker instead of strengthening them.
   The Revolutionary Workers Party of Bangladesh, in a statement by its president Khandakar Ali Abbas and general secretary Saiful Islam, jointly condemned the passage of the upazila bill. They said it was a clear violation of the constitution as well as non-fulfilment of the Awami League’s election pledge.
   ‘It (the new law) will destroy the status of the upazila parishad as an independent local government body,’ said the RWPB’s release.
   Mohammad Shafiq and Abdul Malek Ratan, executive president and general secretary respectively of Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal, in a joint statement termed the Upazila Parishad (Repealed Act Re-Introduction and Amendment) Act a black law because it provides lawmakers sweeping authority over upazila parishads.
   ‘The law is against the spirit of democracy, constitution and the strengthening of the local government bodies, and it has also disappointed the voters,’ said the release.
   ASM Abdur Rab, convener of the Unity for Political Reforms, said that the upazila bill would impede the development and empowerment of the rural people and prevent the giving of an institutional framework to democracy.
   Gano Forum in a statement said that it has been made mandatory for the upazila parishads to consult the lawmakers as well as to accept their recommendations while making plans for development, which will create a political and administrative crisis.
   The Neeti Gobeshona Kendro said the upazila bill would make the local bodies weaker instead of strengthening them. The Equity and Justice Working Group of Bangladesh also issued an almost similar statement and demanded self-government for upazila parishads.

 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [mukto-mona] Re: Attn.: Arafat & all

Dear Mr.Hannan> Please stop this ad hominims. Let's discuss one hadith at a time intellectually. If you are right, I will accept your position graciously. Thanks,

 
 
 
 
 
 
SaifDevdas
islam1234@msn.com






To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
From:
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 20:50:02 +0000
Subject: [mukto-mona] Re: Attn.: Arafat & all

"He (Hasan Mahmud) can not digest Islam..." -Shah Hannan

SAH:
Your response shows that you are terribly frustrated. Could it be because you are aware that as a Jamaat demagogue, you have no option but to live the rest of your life with only the undigested portion of Islam. Every animal has an outlet to release that undigested filth. For Islam, the outlet is Jamaat.

Cheers,
Jahed Ahmed
NY

--- In mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com, "S A Hannan" wrote:
>
> Dear sirs,
>
> Assalamu Alaikum.I do not write harsh words.But now I can say that Hasan
> Mahmud is an ignorant person, knows nothing of Islam.He may have read
> some critical books written by enemies of Islam.He can not digest Islam,
> he can vomit filth.There is no doubt he will end up in dustbin of
> history.He does not know that Quran and proven Sunnah is uchangeable but
> the man-made ijtihad is changeable.None has been destroyed by Islam, for
> social customs some people have suffered in all countries, not only
> Muslim countries.
>
> I will try to avoid him as far as possible.
>
> Shah Abdul Hannan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com [mailto:mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Hasan Mahmud
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 5:45 PM
> To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [mukto-mona] Re: Attn.: Arafat & all
>
> Sir Hannan,
>
> You surely know Islam prohibits astrologers predicting future -
> pretending one doesn't suit a person of your stature. Yes, Islam stands
> for justice and justice will surely prevail - and the anti-Islamic
> institution of Sharia law will be thrown to the dustbin of history. The
> signs are clear - sharia Bolsheviks like you started rejecting many
> Sharia laws that are still in book, in practice and enjoys the status of
> "Allah's law". God knows how many billions of Muslim women and
> non-Muslims you have destroyed in last 1400 years by the venom of Sharia
> law.
>
> It is the most dangerous and heinous conspiracy of history that turned a
> peaceful religion into an oppressive cult. It is the product of power
> politics and patriarchy - it was born out of, lives on and grows in
> conspiracy and brute force.
>
> I joined millions of Muslims to fight it till my last breath until I am
> convinced otherwise. I am owner of my effort, the result rests on The
> Divine.
>
> Keep well, Sir, and see you in the field !
>
> Hasan Mahmud.
>
> --- In mukto-mona@yahoogro <mailto:mukto-mona%40yahoogroups.com>
> ups.com, "S A Hannan" wrote:
>
> Hasan Mahmud will never succeed. Islam is getting stronger every day,
> even in US and Canada . ..His anti-Shariah propanda has made no impact
> on general Muslims..I find every day in Bangladesh new people are
> joining Islam's cause.
>
> Shah Abdul Hannan
>




Quick access to your favorite MSN content and Windows Live with Internet Explorer 8. Download FREE now!

__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Re: Remembrance of Shahid Zia and cantonment house

This type of language shows you are a chicken heart person, Try
to be broadminded. Try to do something for the future. We have
many problems like
1.Drinking water of Dhaka city and other rural areas.Due to water
we are now attached by many sort of disease, so health and
medical problem.
2.Educational institutions are closing day by day.
3.Traffic problem
4. Electricity problem
5. MAnpower are back from foreign countries so they may create
accomodation, traffic , food scarcity.
So think positively.

Thanks & Sorrow


On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:59:10 +0000, J.A. Chowdhury wrote
> Don't worry guys, Kheleda must be remove from Cantonment.
>
> Give some times,BAL govt. must be cancell govt allotment
> of Kheleda's
>
> house at 6 Moinul Road, like as BNP did Hasina Rehena
> house in 2001.Hasina govt.
>
> should not forget that.
> If BNP can cancel govt allocation why not Awami League?
>
> So wait and see.
>
> Regards
>
> J.A.Chowdhury
>
> > To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
> > From: m_musa92870@yahoo.com
> > Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:21:41 +0000
> > Subject: [ALOCHONA] Re: Remembrance of Shahid Zia and
cantonment house
> >
> >
> > Can anybody show any single country where a politician, who
is also the
> > leader of one of the top political parties, permanently lives
inside
> > cantonment? Any civilized countries? Even the not-so-
civilized ones?
> >
> > --- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Mahathir of BD
> > <wouldbemahathirofbd@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > can anyone show any single problem for her doing plitics
living
> > within cantonment?
> > >
> > > ? ( ) , ? , ?
> > >
> > > --- On Sat, 4/4/09, musasarkar m_musa92870@... wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: musasarkar m_musa92870@...
> > > Subject: [ALOCHONA] Re: Remembrance of Shahid Zia and
cantonment house
> > > To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Saturday, April 4, 2009, 5:36 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I 100% agree with your "Let her resign the leadership of
BNP." If
> > > anybody wants to stay inside the cantonment, he or she
cannot do
> > > politics. This should apply to anybody.
> > >
> > > --- In alochona@yahoogroup s.com, "ezajur"
<ezajur.rahman@ ...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Alochok Mosharaf
> > > >
> > > > Hasina's small minded thinking is obvious in this issue.
Mean minded
> > > and
> > > > shameless. It can easily be countered that Khaleda can
keep her
> > > > cantonment home in honour of her husband.
> > > >
> > > > But you should also remember that Ziaur Rahman is waiting
to whip
> > you
> > > > with a belt when he finally gets to see you. For whilst
he might
> > like
> > > > the notion of honouring him by giving his wife a
cantonment home he
> > > must
> > > > disgusted that you think youl honour him by making his
wife Prime
> > > > Minister!
> > > >
> > > > Let her stay in the cantonment. Let her resign the
leadership of
> > BNP.
> > > >
> > > > Let BNP move forward for God's sake!
> > > >
> > > > Ezajur Rahman
> > > >
> > > > Kuwait
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In alochona@yahoogroup s.com, mosharraf khan
mosharrafkhokon@
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear brothers & sisters,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Greetings from the heart of Bangladesh.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > If the widow of retd. Army Chief couldn't reside within
> > > > > the cantonment, how the widow of shahid Army officers
will reside?
> > > Is
> > > > that
> > > > > place only for the widows?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > As I heard that Shahid Zia had been resided in that
house till
> > > > > to death from became a major to be the Army Chief,
President. The
> > > > remembrance
> > > > > of Shadhinotar Ghoshok, Shahid President Ziaur Rahman
should be
> > keep
> > > > up by any
> > > > > cost like the 32 no. house & Tongipara of Bangladesher
Sthopoti
> > > > Bangobandhu
> > > > > Sheikh Mujibar Rahman. We have also seen in the past
how the
> > Bailey
> > > > bridge was
> > > > > shifted from Zia Uddan to Hobiganj.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In near future we are going to be keeping the
remembrance
> > > > > of Khaleda Bibi & Hasina Bubu!!!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We request to all
> > > > > please refrain from vindictive activities and build our
beloved
> > > > Bangladesh
> > > > > together.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mosharraf Khokon
> > > > >
> > > > > Poet, Organizer
> > > > >
> > > > > Secretary General, WPM
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > [Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for
information contained in this message. The author takes full
responsibility.]
> > To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-
owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> More than [WINDOWS-1252?]messages&#8211;check out the rest of the
Windows [WINDOWS-1252?]Live&#8482;.
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/

------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[mukto-mona] Answering Mr. S.A. Hannan's argument on Islam and ideological warfare



Mr. S.A. Hannan, As a Muslim I find it hard to believe a real Muslim will support the mockery on Allah, Islam and his prophet (PBOH).

You said -Restoration of 72 constitution will mean deleting faith in Allah as a pillar of state policy, restoration of socialism, deleting Bismillahir Rahmanir Rahim ( in the name of beneficent and merciful Allah) and also banning all Islamic parties.-

Let us analyze each point you made from Islamic perspective:

Nineteen Seventy Two constitution of Bangladesh, which we (Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Buddhist and other faith) earned waging an independence war that you and Jamaat-e-Islami vehemently opposed not using peaceful means but waging a war against people of Bangladesh.

I thank you for correctly stating the words restoration of 1971, what it mean is going back to its ideological originality with what the country was founded. Bangladesh triumph over Pakistan burying the false notion of two-nation theory, which divided Muslims, and Hindus as different therefore each of them needed separate state.

What the law minister said has no forceful innovation. Democratically elected parliament constructed 1972 constitution on the other hand inclusion of Islam as state religion, faith in Allah, inclusion of Bismillah and allowing religion to be used as tool for politics rather then worshipping  Allah was not constituted by parliament rather proclamation by undemocratic military regime.

Now with the history in hand tell me Mr. S.A. Hannan, who waged the ideological warfare by changing the constitution? Is it the constitutionist of 1972 or the later proclamationists' military government?

Four pillars of 1972 constitution may not be Islamic but it was not anti Islamic or to defame Islam. But later change in constitution by autocratic Gen. Zia and Gen. Ershad regime is not just  anti democratic but surely anti Islamic as well, here is my argument as a Muslim, please read. 

Constitution of any country is the mother of all law and must to follow to its fullest strength, right? Under the framework of constitution, all other laws such as Civil Law, Criminal Law, Land Law etc, right?

Here is very important point; any law, which contradicts with the mother of all law therefore constitution, then the sub laws (Civil, criminal etc) becomes null and void, right?

Now let me come to the point. Current constitution puts its faith in Allah, calls Bangladesh as a Muslim state, and puts Bismillah Hir Rahmanir Rahim (In the name of Allah ……) in the preamble of constitution. Therefore, logic will be all law, which has been adopted in the constitution will be followed by rule of Allah, right?

Now, Mr. S.A. Hannan, please tell me as a Muslim how in the world a constitution that starts in the name of Allah and puts Aiyaa of holly Quran in the preamble, claims Islam as state religion constitutes Civil Law which authorizes a 18 years or old girl to get laid by getting state issued prostitution license!!!!! ! Mr. Hannan, I say Nousubillah, will you say that too?

 Constitution that starts in the name of Allah and puts Aiyaa of holly Quran in the preamble, claims Islam as state religion constitutes Civil Law which authorizes one to get state issued license to open bar to serve alcoholic beverage!!!! Mr. Hannan, what will be your answer to that?

Constitution that starts in the name of Allah and puts Aiyaa of holly Quran (Rahim ( in the name of beneficent and merciful Allah)  in the preamble, claims Islam as state religion constitutes Civil Law which authorizes one to get state issued license to drink alcoholic beverage!!!! !  Mr. Hannan, what will be your answer to that?

Constitution that starts in the name of Allah and puts Aiyaa of holly Quran in the preamble claims Islam as state religion constitutes Civil Law that authorizes one to get state issued license to setup gambling!!!!. Mr. Hannan, I say Nousubillah will you say that too?

Mr. S.A. Hannan, I with very limited knowledge in Islam as well as constitutional laws can site hundreds of anti Islam, Anti Allah, Anti Rasul (PBOH) law that goes against the preamble of constitution that starts with in the name of Allah….

I am ashamed that Muslims of Bangladesh does not understand that by inclusion of Allah and his religion Islam in our constitution and calling our state religion as Islam is nothing but mockery, disrespect and ridiculing Islam for mere political gain by mischief politician's certainly not out of love for true Islam.

Merciful Allah who created this earth and our solar system, allowed it to be inhibited by those who believe in Allah and those who do not. Gave them knowledge to find the truth and said, on the Day of Judgment you will be asked how you used your knowledge, until then you are on your own to belief or disbelief. Alas, we being the creation of Allah wants to change the rule of creator and make rules contrarily to his rule and appoint our self as judge for our makeshift judgment day. This is very sad that we are not ready to wait until his called judgment day but wants to handle it on our own.

Inclusive Islam that spread like a breakneck stream throughout the world with the word Salam to all, believers and non-believers alike now only wants to embrace ones and disowned the others.

Mr. S.A. Hannan, you said

What is the need for doing all these?  Islamic provisions in the constitution are  not any problem because Islam grants all other religious communities all fundamental rights ( Madinan society under the Prophet is the greatest proof where Jews were granted all civil, political and religious rights under the constitution made by the Prophet.  ).It is true that in a state where Muslims are in great majority, Islam will get special position .This does not create any  problem because other communities' rights are properly protected as per Islam.In entire history of Islam , all Muslim states  whether Khulafae Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Mughals or Usmani regime in Istambul, Islam had very special position. It was  natural thing.This should remain so

Mr. Hannan who gave you the authority to GRANT when Allah granted this world to all. Its land, its air, its stream of water then what right you have to use the word grant being a recover of his mercy. . Let me point you to an argument, Muslim living in US a christen majority country do not curtail their religious beliefs too, what will be your argument Mr.. Hannan.

Religious rights of other faith prevailed on the days our Rasul (PBUH), but no longer in many cases in many Muslim majority places. Practice of religion of other faith is no longer allowed in Mecca . What that means Mr. Hannan, is it not Islam in the hands of creation changed the creators rule!!!

Unnecessarily as an argument to special treatment to Islam, you said:

All Muslim states  whether Khulafae Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Mughals or Usmani regime in Istambul, Islam had very special position. It was natural thing.This should remain so..

It was Allah's wish, and Sahabaya Ikram's judgment, that after the death of our fourth Khulafa-e-Rashideen the Political Islam ended because by then it was clear that this could not sustain rather it creates Fitna among Muslim. Out of four Khalifah three of them was brutally murdered

First Khalifah Hadhrat Abu Bakr Siddique (radhiyallahu anhu) death was normal

Second Khalifah Hadhrat Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) died in the hands of Abu Lu'lu', the Majúsi (fire-worshipper)

Third Khalifah Hadhrat Uthman Ghani (radhiyallahu anhu) was brutally martyred on 18th Thil Hajj, 35 Hijri. When he was martyred, he was reciting the Qur'aan Majeed. His blood fell on the aayat:

Fourth and last Khalifah Hazrat Ali (radhiyallahu anhu) was martyred by Abdur Rahman Ibn Muljim on 18th of Ramadan in Kufa

Your mentioned Umayyad, Abbasid, Mughals or Usmani regime in Istambul are nothing but Kingship, which is very against the rule of Islamic theology, so no comments.

Mr. Hannan you said:

Dear sirs, there is no need for a new ideological war in this county, It will create serious conflict and turmoil and where it will end up only Allah knows.No body can be sure such change made will be sustained later..I urge al of you to keep watch over the situation and to  save the country from such conflict and turmoil .Bangladesh has so many  problems, we should not open this new major problem.If any of you can influence Awami League leadership ,you should do so.

Mr. Hannan we hard this Jamaat-e-Islami political stunt rhetoric in 1971. When the entire nation was waging a war of liberation, Jamaat-e-Islami said the same thing. Their political doctrine of saving Pakistan to salvage Islam leaded them to contribute of bloodshed of Bengalis by forming Pakistani collaborator jalim Rajakar.

Mr. Hannan, you said - serious conflict and turmoil and where it will end up only Allah knows.

Nevertheless, you know that scare technique did not work in 1971 therefore; it will not work this time too. Serious conflict and turmoil of 1971 created Bangladesh , this time it will create Razakar free Bangladesh . Last time there was clemency because of Bangabandhu a lion hart man, this time there is none to pronounce clemency.

If not literal then Bangladesh must choose to go back to the spirit of 1972 constitution. This is the demand of the time for the survival of Bangladesh and to keep the promise given to fallen comrades.

Shamim Chowdhury

Maryland, USA


--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, "S A Hannan" <sahannan@...> wrote:

Dear members of the list,

Assalamu Alaikum. I will only add that  the freedom fighters did not
fight against Islam as far as I have come to know from them., they
fought against discrimination against this province by central
authorities.

In 1970 election manifesto they did not say a word against Islamic
constitution or that they would add a provision banning Islamic
parties.They violated their promise.

Bangladesh is still based ontwo nation theory, other wise it can not
have this border.

Where as inclusion of secularism was a violation of Awami League
manifesto of 1970, the restoration of Islamic provisions through the
Parliament and referendum in 1977 was a lawful act.

For Muslims, no constitution is above the teaching of the Quran, for
that reason it is always better to make constitution in a Muslim country
in line with Islam.

The lomg letter writer  has mentioned about some un-Islamic activities
happening  in Bangladesh  ( some prostitution and drinking etc)even
though throe is Bismillahir Rahmanir Rahim in the beginning of the
constitution.The only course for this is  to eradicate those things in
due course of time, not to delete Bismillah.It is a negative
thinking.There are not many anti-Islamic laws  now in Bangladesh.Only a
few laws are there where a few sections have to be changed in the light
of Islam and we hope somr government now or in future will do that and
in this process continuance of Article 8 A will be helpful ( Faith in
Almighty Allah is the basis of all actions of the state.

I agree West has good points but it is also true that western
civilization has produced many evil concepts and ideologies which are
like poison such as Fascism,Communism, Capitalism, secularism and
Materialism.These ideologies have ruined humanity and made them inhuman
robot.

I am not responding to  other points. This is no academic and scholary
response, it is only polemics.

Shah Abdul Hannan



__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Re: Remembrance of Shahid Zia and cantonment house

Khaleda Zia and her BNP her family members act is full of disgraceful embarrassment for the nation as well as Gen. Zia. She is the only PM in the history of our subcontinent who stashed black money in million. She is disgrace to politics

 

On July 31st of 2007 Khaleda Zia paid Tk 33 lakh to the National Board of Revenue (NBR) under an amnesty offered to tax dodgers to get their undisclosed money legalized. Can you imagine a tax dodger of her kind still do politics and talk trash about others!!!

 

Shamim Chowdhury

Maryland, USA

 
Committed to PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO KNOW
Vol. 5 Num 1127 Wed. August 01, 2007  
   
Front Page


Khaleda avails NBR amnesty
Pays Tk 33 lakh tax to legalise undisclosed money


Ex-prime minister Khaleda Zia yesterday paid Tk 33 lakh to the National Board of Revenue (NBR) under an amnesty offered to tax dodgers to get their undisclosed money legalised.

The NBR has so far received around Tk 300 crore tax under the amnesty as a total of 8,559 people took the opportunity to whiten black money amounting to Tk 1,622 crore, a senior

NBR official told the news agency.

The official confirmed that Khaleda, earlier notified by the Anti-Corruption Commission for submitting her wealth statement, declared her undisclosed money yesterday by paying the tax.

"She directly deposited the money with Bangladesh Bank and sent a copy of her statement to the NBR through courier service today," he said yesterday evening.

The BNP chairperson is among those who availed the last-minute chance before the expiry of the amnesty. However, NBR extended the deadline till September 30.

The NBR official said there is nothing illegal in this type of payment. But he declined to give details about Khaleda's total untaxed money declared today.


--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, mosharraf khan <mosharrafkhokon@...> wrote:

> Dear brothers & sisters,
>
> Greetings from the heart of Bangladesh.

> If the widow of retd. Army Chief couldn't reside within
> the cantonment, how the widow of shahid Army officers will reside? Is that
> place only for the widows?
>
>  
>
> As I heard that Shahid Zia had been resided in that house till
> to death from became a major to be the Army Chief, President. The remembrance
> of Shadhinotar Ghoshok, Shahid President Ziaur Rahman should be keep up by any
> cost like the 32 no. house & Tongipara of Bangladesher Sthopoti Bangobandhu
> Sheikh Mujibar Rahman. We have also seen in the past how the Bailey bridge was
> shifted from Zia Uddan to Hobiganj.
> In near future we are going to be keeping the remembrance
> of Khaleda Bibi & Hasina Bubu!!!
>
> We request to all
> please refrain from vindictive activities and build our beloved Bangladesh
> together.

> Thanks & Regards,
> Mosharraf Khokon
> Poet, Organizer
> Secretary General, WPM
>



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] Part2: Jamaat-e-Islam Bangladesh:Profile of a killer:Golam Azam



Part2: Jamaat-e-Islam Bangladesh : Profile of a killer: Golam Azam"Number One war criminal''
Dear readers,
 
As we all know that Jamaat-e-Islami which is now known as Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh was heavily drawn into mass murdering, rape, arson, looting and especially killing of intellectual during the last part of our glorious liberation war. Jamaat or Jamatis was related with most genocide that happened during nine months of liberation war. To understand the genocide of 1971 and those who committed the genocide we must recognize and identify Jamaat leaders and their heinous activities during 1971 as well as their conspiracy against the democratic secular Bangladesh at this time.
 
Most of the Jamaat leaders of today's Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh have a very dark chapter of their life which they try to hide by all means. Their heinous activities in the name of Allah and Islam they committed and continue to commit crime against humanity must be challenged. They were danger then and more dangerous now. Their treacherous activity is challenging for true democratization of our country where pluralistic society will thrive. 
 
Jamaat-e-Islami who completely disagree with the basic premise of democratic pluralistic state and society by participation of all citizens with equal right and wants to establish Moulana Moududi version of Islam by any means.
 
Deceiving, lying and conniving manipulation of two faces Jamaat-e-Islam is in sequence with the teaching of their spiritual guide and founding father Syed Ab'ul Ala Maududi. In page 54 of his Voluminous "Tarjamanul Qura'an": - he said "Truth is one of the most important principles of Islam and lying is one of the greatest sins. But in real life some needs are such that telling a lie is not only allowed, in some circumstances it is decreed mandatory".
 
Dear readers, to uncover or revisit the truth, to understand the depth of Jamaat-e-Islam's conspiracy against our democratic institution we have taken this step to bring Jamatis out of there closet and introduce them to our new generation.
 
We must understand the true enemy of pluralistic democratic Bangladesh is NONE BUT PAROCHIAL JAMAAT-E-ISLAM of Bangladesh.
 
I urge you to speak out against this vicious political identity and help our new generation to understand them better. Please contribute!
 
We start our second part of this series "Jamaat-e-Islam Bangladesh : Profile of a killers" series with Golam Azam the first Amber of Jamaat-e-Islam Bangladesh " aiming to expose these heinous killers and continue to uncover all other executive members of Jamaat-e-Islam Bangladesh .
 
Central Executive Committee
* Maulana Motiur Rahman Nizami
Amber-e-Jamaat & President,
1. Maulana Abul Katam Muhammad Yusuf
2. Mr. Maqbul Ahmad
3. Prof. A.K.M. Nazir Ahmad
4. Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed
5. Maulana Abdus Sobhan
6. Maulana Delawar Hossain Sayedee
7. Mr. Muhammad Kamaruzzaman
8. Mr. Abdul Quader Molla
9. Mr. ATM Azharul Islam
10. Mr. Badre Alam
11. Mr. Abu Naser Muhammad Abduzzaher
12. Mr. Mir Kasem Ali
13. Maulana Rafiuddin Ahmad.
14. Barrister Abdur Razzak.
15.Moulana Rafiqul Islam Khan
Member Central Working Committee
  • Maulana Motiur Rahman Nizami : Amber-e-Jamaat
    1 Maulana Abul Kalam Muhammad Yusuf : Senior Nayeb-e-Ameer
    2. Mr. Maqbul Ahmad : Nayeb-e-Ameer
    3. Prof. AKM Nazir Ahmad : Nayeb-e-Ameer
    4. Mr. Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed: Secretary General
    6. Maulana Abdus Sobhan : Central Executive & working Committee Member
    7. Maulana Delawar Hossain Sayedee : Central Executive & Working Committee Member
    8 Mr Muhammad Kamaruzzaman : Senior Assistant Secretary General
    9. Mr. Abdul QuaderMolla : Assistant Secretary General
    10 Mr ATM Azharul Islam : Assistant Secretary General
    11 Prof. Mujibur Rahman Assistant Secretary General
    12. Maulana MuharnmadAbuTaher: Assistant Secretary General
    13 Mr.BadreAlarn Central Executive Working Committee Member
    14 Mr Abu Naser Muhammad Abduzzaher Working Committee member
    15.Mr. Mir Kasem Ali : Central Executive & Working Committee Member
    16. Maulana Rafiuddin Ahmad : Member
    17. Barrister Abdur Razzak: Assistant Secretary General
    18. Principal Ahdur Rob: Central Working Committee Member
    19. Maulana Sarthr Abdus Salam: Central Working Committee Member
    20. Prof. Md.TasneemAlam: Central Working Committee Member
    21. Mr. Abul Asad: Central Working Committee Member
    22. Prof. Sharif Hossain Central Working Committee Member
    23. Maulana Nazrul Islam Advocate: Central Wo Committee Member
    24. Mr. Ataur Rahman : Central Working Committee Member, Rajshahi City
    25. Dr. Muhammad Shafiqur Rahman : Central Working Committee Member, Syihet City
    26. Principal Shah MuhcL Ruhul Quddus : Central Working Committee Member
    27. Maulana Mominul Haq Chowdhuiy: Central Working Committee Member
    28.Dr.AnisurRahman : Central Working Comrnittee Member
    29. Prof. Fazlur Rahman : Central Working Committee Member
    30. Mr. Muhammad Shahed : Central Working Committee Member
    31. Maulana Farid Uddin Chowdhury: Central Working Committee Member
    32. Mr. Golam Rabbani: Central Working uittee Member
    33. Mr. Saiful Alam Khan Milon : Central Working Committee Member
    34. Mr. Abdur Rob : Central Working Committee Member
    35. Prof. Mian Golam Parwar : Central Working Committee Member, Khulna City
    36. Advocate Abdul Iatif : Central Working Committee Member
    37. Principal Muhammad Izzatullah : Central Working Committee Member
    39. Mr. Mominul Islam Patwary : Central Working Committee Member,
    39. Maulana Shamsul Islam : Central Working Committee Member, Chittagong_City
    40. Advocate Moazzem Hossain Helal : Central Working Committee Member, Barisal City
 
Jamaat-e-Islam Bangladesh : Profile of killers Golam Azam First Amber-e-Jamaat of Bangladesh
The head (Ameer) of the collaborators (Rajakar) of Pakistani occupation army and a heinous war criminal. The vile monster behind the genocide of 1971, rapes and molestation of 45,00,000 Bengali women and murder of hundreds of pro Bangladesh intellectuals. In one of the photos recovered from the archive of Pakistan military intelligence Golam Azam and his top associate Motiur Rahman Nizami are seen handing the list of the names of progressive Bangalee intellectuals over to the Pakistani generals for elimination. The guru of extremist Islamic ideologies in Bangladesh . The leader of 70,000 Razakars, Al-Badr and Al-Sams forces.
(New York Times, 30 July, 1971).
 
War criminal Golam Azam cartoon link: http://www.iftwcb.org/images/ghatak.jpg
 
When the burden of the killing became too much for the army, the Pakistanis enlisted and trained paramilitary units made up of non-Bengali Muslims and Bengali collaborators from right-wing religious parties. These paramilitary units, the al-Badr and al-Shams, worked as informers and assassins to augment the military's gruesome task of killing Bengalis. In June 1971 Sydney Schanberg reported on the formation of these units:
 
In June 1971 Sydney Schanberg reported 'Throughout East Pakistan the Army is training new paramilitary home guards or simply arming "loyal" civilians, some of whom are formed into peace committees. Besides Biharis and other non-Bengali, Urdu-speaking Moslems, the recruits include the small minority of Bengali Moslems who have long supported the army -- adherents of the right-wing religious parties such as the Moslem League and Jamaat-e-Islami led by Golam Azam and Motiur Rahman Nizami
 
These groups collectively known as the Razakars, the paramilitary units spread terror throughout the Bengali population. With their local knowledge, the Razakars were an invaluable tool in the Pakistani Army's arsenal of genocide.'
However, In June the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Sydney Schanberg filed a number of eyewitness accounts from Bangladeshi towns for The New York Times. In response, the Pakistan army expelled him from the country on June 30, 1971.
 
Golam Azam, Rao Forman & Malek, discussing blue print for killing the pro Bangladesh intellectuals
 
The Pakistan army, on the verge of defeat, was determined to wipe out Bengali culture in one final act of barbarism. On December 14, 1971, the Pakistan army unleashed the paramilitary units led by Jamaat-e-Islami Al-Badr and Al-Shams to exterminate Bengali intellectuals. The goal was to find and kill Bengali political thinkers, educators, scientists, poets, doctors, lawyers, journalists and other intellectuals. The al-Badr and al-Shams fanned out with lists of names to find and execute the core of Bengali intellectuals. The intellectuals were arrested and taken to Rayerbazar, a marshy area in Dhaka city.
 
There, they were gunned down with their eyes blindfolded and their hands tied behind their backs. Jamaat-e-Islami and its leaders were in the forefront of this planning and execution of Bengali intellectuals. Al-Badr and Al-Shams systematically executed well over 200 of East Pakistan 's intellectuals and scholars. Professors, journalists, doctors, artists, engineers, writers were rounded up, blindfolded, taken to torture cells in Mirpur, Mohammadpur, Nakhalpara, Rajarbagh and other locations in different sections of the city; and executed en masse in the killing fields, most notably at Rayerbazar and Mirpur.
 
Several noted intellectuals who were killed from the time period of 25th March to 16th December, 1971 in different parts of the country include Dr. G. C. Dev (Philosopher, Professor at DU),Dr. Munir Chowdhury (Litterateur, Dramatist, Professor at DU), Dr. Mofazzal Haider Chowdhury (Litterateur, Professor at DU), Dr. Anawar Pasha (Litterateur, Professor at DU), Dr. Fazle Rabbi (cardiologist), Dr. Alim Chowdhury (opthalmologist), Shahidullah Kaisar (journalist), Nizamuddin Ahmed (Reporter), Selina Parvin (reporter), Altaf Mahmud (lyricist and musician), Dr. Hobibur Rahman (mathematician, Professor at RU), Dhiren Dutt (politician), R. P. Saha (philanthropist), Lt. Col. Moazzem Hossain (ex-soldier), Mamun Mahmood (Police Officer)and many others.
 
Noted writter Dr. Rashid Aksari stated in one of his writing "The paramilitary force Al-Badr, which was formed in September 1971 under the auspices of General Niazi, chief of the Eastern Command of the Pakistan Army, was the instigator of that hideous massacre. Their objective was to strike panic into the people by abduction and killing. It was the military adviser to the so-called Governor, Major General Rao Forman Ali who masterminded the whole conspiracy to extinguish the intellectuals and the higher educated class. Had they had one week time more, they would have killed all the Bengali intellectuals, which was a part of their master plan. The Badr force was in fact a special terrorist faction of the then Jamaat-e-Islami led by Moududi, Golam Azam, and Abdur Rahim.
 
He continues to narrate "Immediately after submitting the killing plan, Golam Azam, along with the chief of the Razakars, Mohammad Yunus, and the liaison officer of the Peace Committee, Mahbubur Rahman Gurha, went to see the training of the Razakar and Al-Badr at the Physical Training College . From then on the Student Sangha all over the country was transformed into Al-Badr and in the last week of November and first half of December the list of the intellectuals was handed over to them for abduction and persecution.
 
On December 4 began the imposed curfew and black out to pave the way for abduction. The preparation for abduction of the intellectuals extensively started from December 10. Amid curfew and black out, an Al-Badr bus, stained with mud, picked up the listed intellectuals from their residences. Then they were taken to the Al-Badr headquarter at Mohammadpur Physical Training College for interrogation and persecution. At dead of night they were taken to Rayerbazar brick field and killed. The killing also took place at Mirpur.
 
Golam Azam (born 1922) the mother of all killer, is a Bangladeshi political leader. He is also widely known as a war criminal who collaborated with the Pakistan Army during the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971, particularly with regards to creating and managing the vigilante Razakar and Al-Badr forces. Recently released unclassified documents of the Pakistan government reiterate his role as a war criminal. He refused to accept the independence of Bangladesh upon its liberation on December 16th 1971, and was a permanent resident of Pakistan until 1978, and maintained Pakistani citizenship until 1994.
 
Entering politics as a student leader at Dhaka University , Azam became the secretary of the fundamentalist Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh in 1957. Later, he became the Amber (president) of the Jamaat in East Pakistan in 1969. During the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971, he was accused of collaboration with the Pakistan Army, and was also accused of war crimes.
 
To the last leg of nine months long war on receiving an urgent telegram from Maududi, Golam Azam went to Lahore , on 22 November 1971, to see him. He could not return to Bangladesh as his citizenship was revoked by Sheikh Mujib government. Failing to return to Bangladesh the arch criminal went to Mecca , ostensibly, for Hajj.  From Saudi Arabia Go Azam traveled Dubai , Abu Dhabi , Kuwait , Beirut and Libya to lobby against Sheikh Mujib government and raise funds for counter revolution.
 
Following his extensive international PR activities Go Azam arrived in London . From London he published the Jamati newspaper Daily Sangram on a weekly basis.  In 1974, the weekly Bichitra published a very interesting report on Golam Azam's activities in London : In early 1974, Golam Azam presented a blueprint of anti Bangladesh activities at a committee meeting held in a house in East London . According to a reliable source some Pakistani nationals were also present in that meeting.
 
The participants in that secret meeting were: AT Sadi, Toaha bin Habib, Ali Hossain, Barrister Akhtar Uddin, Meher Ali and Dr Talukdar. Pakistani citizen Mahmud Ali is one of the top Pakistanis present in that meeting. The chair of the meeting Golam Azam said " to continue our activities from London will be difficult. So someone has to go back home. We ought to take risk-otherwise there will be no outcome. But if you go home-you will have contacts. I have already contacted my people. Everything is okay. Handing out a leaflet to all members present Golam said it has to be distributed among the people of every village of Bangladesh . People are with us.
 
According to some sources the said leaflet contained propaganda for a proposed confederation with Pakistan . Others believed that it called for an Islamic revolution organized using the network of mosques. Some people were reported to have arrested near Dhaka carrying those leaflets. Golam Azam also mentioned the proposed support for anti Bangladesh activities from Pakistan and some other Middle Eastern countries. (Like Zia) Golam Azam said 'Money is not a problem'.
 
It was heard that Golam Azam collected 45,000,000 Reals  from Saudi Arabia for reconstructing the mosques of Bangladesh demolished during the war. Shrewd Golam spent a large portion of that money to purchase a house in Manchester in UK . Presently his son Mehedi Hasan is living in that house. Golam' eldest son Kaifi Azmi is a senior officer in Bangladesh Army and believed to be working as a link between ISI cell in Bangladesh Army and Jamati Terrorist groups.
 
After the war, the Bangladesh government sought to remove the influence of the fundamentalists and collaborators, and Golam Azam's citizenship was cancelled. He chose to live in exile in Pakistan and England until 1978, when President Ziaur Rahman re-established multi-party democracy and legalized the previously banned fundamentalist parties, and allowed him to return to Bangladesh on a temporary visa.
 
Golam Azam became the unofficial Amber of the party while remaining in the country illegally (though no attempt was made to restrain him and he moved around openly), and his citizenship was restored in 1994 by a decision of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh.
 
Ghulam Azam announced his retirement from active politics in late 2000. He was succeeded by Motiur Rahman Nizami. Golam was Ameer of Jamaat-e-Islami from 1969 to 2000 which is THIRTY ONE YEAR ( So called Islamic Democracy) probably just to follow the foot step of his leader Moududi who was also the ameer of  Jamaat from its formation on 6 August 1941 till 1972 which is THIRTY ONE YEAR too.
 
Ghulam Azam's party, Jamaat-e-Islami, has been accused by a cross section of political parties and secular organizations as a patron of recently (2002-2006) rising militancy and behind a number of terrorist bombings. Almost all of the recently arrested militants were alleged to have links in the past to either the Jamaat or its student wing, the Islami Chhatra Shibir some Bangladeshi newspapers such as The Daily Star, Prothom Alo, Janakantha and Bhorer Kagoj describes Jamaat as who favors destabilizations of mainstream politics so as to reap the dividend from the subsequent vacuum.
 
Reference:
1.       Liberation Museum
2.      Killers and Collaborators of 1971: An Account of Their Whereabouts, compiled and published by the Center for the Development of the Spirit of the Liberation War
3.      Commission on War Criminals of Bangladesh
4.      Saiduzzaman Raushan: Speeches and Statements of Killers & Collaborators of 1971
6.      West Pakistan Pursues Subjugation of Bengalis; West Pakistan Pursues Bengali Subjugation by SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
7.      The portrait of Golam Azam by Dr Humayun Azad
  1. Jahanara Imam: Ekatturer Dinguli
9.      Jahanara Imam: Buker Vitor Agun
10.  Sadiq Salik - Witness to Surrender
11.   S M Shafiullah - Bangladesh At War




__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] PLANTED IN A POLITICAL MINEFIELD



PLANTED IN A POLITICAL MINEFIELD

Sheikh Hasina's approach towards the Anup Chetia case will determine how the new regime is judged in Bangladesh, writes Sanjib Baruah
 
Less than a week before the mutiny broke out in the headquarters of the Bangladesh Rifles in Dhaka, it was widely reported that the Bangladeshi authorities were about to hand over to India the United Liberation Front of Asom leader, Anup Chetia, who has been held in a Bangladeshi prison since 1996.

As things slowly return to normal in Bangladesh, many now expect the government, led by Sheikh Hasina Wajed, to attend to its ambitious domestic and foreign policy agenda. When asked by journalists in Delhi on April 1 about Chetia, the new director general of BDR, Mainul Islam, said, "Some time is needed for the new government to walk the talk." But the handover, he assured, will take place soon.

Expectations that the new government would move quickly on matters that concern India may be premature. The government has extended the deadline for the completion of the official inquiry on the mutiny for a third time. But even before all the facts are in, one lesson of the mutiny may already be quite apparent to Sheikh Hasina. Addressing issues concerning India will use up significant political capital. She will have to carefully weigh those costs while making each and every decision.

The question of Chetia's handover was more than a sideshow in the recent developments in Dhaka. The distinguished Bangladeshi political commentator and former ambassador, Harunur Rashid, while trying to provide the political context for the mutiny, cited the Chetia handover as one of the "crucial decisions" that had angered "influential groups" in his country.

Placed alongside the decisions to restart the murder trial of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and the trial of those charged with war-crimes in the 1971 war, the importance attached to the Chetia case would seem astonishing. A letter written in December 2008 by Chetia's lawyer to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in support of Chetia's application for political refugee status describes him as a "freedom fighter" — the term that the former prime minister, Begum Khaleda Zia, once used to describe insurgents from India's Northeast when she was the leader of the opposition. Bangladesh, she had then argued, should extend support to these groups and not try to limit their activities.

Chetia had asked for political asylum in Bangladesh as far back as 1998. After a number of appeals to the government went unanswered, a writ petition was filed in the high court on his behalf by an NGO with high-level political connections. In response, the court, in August 2003, asked the government, then headed by Khaleda Zia, to explain why the application could not be acted upon expeditiously, and ordered that Chetia and his two colleagues continue to be held in prison for their safety until the issue of political asylum is settled.

Citing that pending case, Chetia's lawyer in his December 2008 letter to the UNHCR said that "a covert move possibly emanat[ing] from the terrible pressure created by Indian Government" was afoot to hand over Chetia to Indian authorities "without considering the legal and political status of [his] client". How the Sheikh Hasina government approaches the Chetia case may have become a test by which the new regime will be judged vis-à-vis its dealings with India — the most sensitive of questions in Bangladeshi politics.
Since the Awami League's opponents portray the party as India's stooge, Sheikh Hasina can hardly appear too eager to please India.
 
 It is not only radical Islamists who would make hay of anything that could be portrayed as caving in to Indian demands; Bangladeshi nationalists of all stripes also care as deeply about how their government deals with India. In spite of her huge mandate, Sheikh Hasina, the prime minister, will have to consider seriously how her actions vis-à-vis India are interpreted by various domestic constituencies — by her enemies as well as by friends.

Indian leaders will do well to keep the Bangladeshi street in mind when making statements about putting pressure on Bangladesh. Tough talk on Bangladesh sheltering Indian insurgents or on the role of Bangladeshi Islamist outfits in the Mumbai terror attacks, or on the Guwahati blasts, or warnings to Bangladesh that good relations with India are in its long-term interests — as the home minister, P. Chidambaram, has said — can easily backfire. As the December elections have proved, efforts to portray Bangladesh as a failed State full of jihadi militants are both misguided and counter-productive.
 
 They are deeply resented by most Bangladeshis — not by Islamist radicals alone — especially when the charges originate in India. The spread of the news of the apparently imminent release of Chetia, and the Bangladesh government's reaction to it during the week before the mutiny, give us some clues to the politics involved. The source of the news was an interview with an Indian television channel of Bangladesh's state minister for foreign affairs, Mohammed Hassan Mahmud, together with an article in a Bangladeshi online newspaper by the Indian journalist who interviewed him.

Apart from saying that New Delhi and Dhaka had "mutually agreed" on handing over Chetia, Mahmud spoke of previous Bangladeshi governments nurturing terrorist organizations. He addressed the question of cross-border linkages of terrorist groups while referring to the Mumbai terror attacks, and the possibility that the banned Harkat-ul-Jihadi-Islami could still have "underground pockets" in Bangladesh. Not surprisingly, such comments, coming from a top Bangladeshi official, became breaking news in India, Bangladesh and beyond. Perhaps equally unsurprising was the clarification on behalf of the minister that immediately followed.
 
The minister claimed he was misquoted. On the Chetia matter, it was said that "the report of decisions and so-called promises made with regard to handing over specific individuals" was both a misrepresentation of what the minister said and also factually inaccurate. On the exchange of terrorists, we are now told that there is apparently no more than consultations regarding a South Asian regional mechanism to facilitate the exchange of convicted criminals and a Bangladeshi initiative on a regional cooperation and coordination mechanism to prevent linkages and cooperation amongst the terrorist elements in the region.

In a January 2009 review of the new edition of  India Doctrine — a 2007 book that is highly critical of India and popular in Bangladeshi political circles — the reviewer advises Bangladesh's new government to "adopt a more cautious attitude to New Delhi since our own history shows that a two-thirds majority in parliament is no guarantee of longevity or permanence in power especially when deeply held views about our national interest are constantly and arrogantly offended." It seems that in spite of Sheikh Hasina's landslide victory, her government would have to be extra careful in making any decision that concerns India so that her critics cannot accuse her of compromising national sovereignty and equality. The Chetia case is now part of this political minefield that she must negotiate.
 
The author is at Bard College, New York, and with the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi
 
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1090407/jsp/opinion/story_10769701.jsp



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___