Banner Advertiser

Monday, June 15, 2009

[ALOCHONA] INDIA GALLING PEACE OF NEPAL



INDIA GALLING PEACE OF NEPAL
 
 
BACKGROUND
The devil's eyes are all set to blaze inferno in Nepal.
Indian ambassador Rakesh Sood once again has got activated like swine
in a jungle. He holds conferences, chairs meetings and ignites
processions as if the land of beauty belongs to India. A year back
when the Maoists won elections the ambassador Sood tried utmost to
grab the victory while garlanding the geniuses of "RAW THE RASCAL"
which is bent upon disparaging peace of Asia. Sood has always been
escorted by the RAW'S agents to do spoon feeding advices as a ready
recknor to aggravate the situation. But the government of Nepal led by
Prachanda has proved its worth right from the beginning while
dislodging the crutches of India and turning deaf ears to the advices
of Sood working under the umbrella of "RAW". Prachanda the premier of
Nepal had broken the shackles of remaining slave to the idea of land
locked country and simultaneously refused to bow before India the self
portrayed master, while setting his path by visiting China became the
first blow to the expansionist designer as well as declining political
yatra to India, an act unpardonable thus painting black on the
quisling canvas of the "RAW".

CHAGRIN SPIRIT
Nepalese are well aware about the ogre behavior of India which keeps
architecting the menace in the files of innocent people of Nepal. They
exactly know and can distinctly point a foe and a friend but India and
its illegitimate son "RAW THE RASCAL" have considered the compulsion
of being the land locked country a blessing in disguise. The nation of
Nepal holds the ocean of wrath, the venom in abundance and great
resentment to spit on the face of India and her charlatan RAW. Who
would respect India which herds the waters of Nepal inside her
territory produces hydroelectric power from it and then sells the
electricity back to Nepal at costlier rates! Who would grace the act
of India, which grabs the land of Nepal and includes the same in its
territories! Who would appreciate the misdemeanor of India which
steals the precious wood from her jungles! Who would like the conduct
of India which settles many Indians within bounds of Nepal and then
forces sovereign country to issue them identity cards and most likely
chances are that India is creating a fighting force fully armed on the
lines of Mukti Bahnis or LTTE to create turbulence in the peaceful
country as and when wished by the RAW! And who is not aware about the
chicaneries of India which keeps creating the pitfalls on the path of
democracy, sovereignty and integrity of Nepal! The feud of India can
be adjudged who is always ready to strengthen the corrupt politicians
of Nepal by bribing them to run the government instead of politicians
having love and pain for their country and in lieu the same bribable
lot of politicians respond to every call & the wrong doings of the
RAW. Nepal's chagrin spirit is alive and India can draw a lesson from
Prachanda's resignation that did not leave his stance and refused to
kneel down before Indian's demand.
                                                 
IMPULSES
What may occur the Maoist government had decided to take out the
nation which was pledged to India since centuries. It was for the
first time in the history of Nepal that the top leadership of the
country had looked straight in to the eyes of India and slashed its
schedule of visiting her to get the dicta of running the affairs of
government instead preferred its path leading to China. Even the Moist
leader Baburam Bhattarai asked leaders not to visit India and instead
make indigenous efforts to complete the constitution making process.
This appeal was a sign of distrust over India's policies and the
intensity of deviation displayed confidence building measures to avoid
dependence promising to stand on one's own feet. That's how the nation
is made to carve her path of destiny & feature its fate to secure
future of the country.
 
The last few months of Maoist rule in Nepal has seen China's level of
presence and major interest in Nepal going far beyond the Tibet issue.
Prachanda's two visits to China were something that had put India in
to uncomfortable situation. When an earnest effort was being made by
the two governments to bridge the gulf between China & Nepal, at the
same time India was trying hard to display her usual menace of weaving
conspiracy to topple the legitimate government. The projection of
India as a factor of instability, disregarding the formula of self
respect and the undue beneficiary of Nepal's resources, mainly
hydro-power, apparently compelled Nepal to cultivate her relations
with China.
 
The RAW through Sood got in to the business of breaking
process waiting for the chance to strike thus charring the long
awaited democracy in Nepal. But Baburam Bhattarai, of late had showed
her apprehensions openly that the RAW along with the CIA were trying
to project India as at the heart of renewed conspiracy thus claiming
her leverage on Nepal. The conspirers were adamant to bring back
monarchy coupled with the parties who had a flexible character to
charm the RAW, funding more than their need. These Yankees having
their soft belly had always kept their own interest far superior to
the national interest thus became always an easy prey for the RAW.
 
CABALISTS & THE PLOT
The frame up was ready to oust the democratic government of Nepal by
the cabalists like the RAW and CIA in the streamline to punish Maoists
for their crime of looking towards China and turning blind eye to the
atrocious India who knew nothing but to steal the resources of Nepal
when leaving politicians to fight with each other on instigation of
RAW.
 
On the face of it, the case of firing the Nepalese Army Chief,
General Rukmangad Katuwal, was intertwined. It was not that straight
forward a matter because Katuwal was not only laying impediments or
the bone of contention to induct former Maoist guerillas in to Nepal's
armed forces, as per the November 2006 peace treaty but it was sniffed
the General was ready to conduct a coup against the civilian
government as allocated a Plot planned by the RAW. The Coup d' e' tat
was a Vendetta formed by the RAW to oust a democratic government
having fault lines of paying no heed to India instead looking towards
China to wheel the country on the path of glory, self respect and
progress.
 
The defiance of orders of the executive head of the state meant, just
putting country's integrity at stake and the action of the first
president of Nepal following the track as planned by the RAW, had
compelled the elected Premier to resign from his position for the
honour of his country. Otherwise there would have been a bloodshed
that's what the RAW wished for. Prachanda recently declared himself
that India supported and RAW had forced the president to carry out
such a drastic decision which was unconstitutional, illegitimate,
illegal and contrary while betraying the orders of the Prime Minister.
If this course of "unconstitutional decision" was not workable then
RAW had given the plot of moving the General in question to conduct
Coup to over throw the government and the resistance casting lives
would have fumed anarchy in Nepal.
 
This plot was supported by the CIA, planted by the RAW and acted by
the first President of Nepal and his team who remains on sale through
out the period of their stay in the parliament as they require money
and can do what the RAW asked them to do. What a big tragedy it is
that after removing the bonafide government from Nepal, India has
crowned the corrupt politicians to run the government which is the
bunch of brokers selected by the RAW. Once again India has come back
in to a driving seat and now will keep the politicians fight, compel
the Maoists to carry their arms, keep China at bay and grab all the
resources of Nepal to Delhi. How pessimistic state is that now RAW
will force Nepal to stand on her knees than his feet and beg for each
article even that grows in Nepal. When own politicians trade and sell
the honour, integrity and sovereignty of a country and are always
ready to dance on the tunes of RAW for their petty gains then who can
save the country from going to hell.
 
CULL-DE-SAC
Loosing command over circumstances means India will have a free access
to score the goal and drive the nation to a cull-de-sac. Now the
formulation of indigenous constitution could be a dream alone as New
Delhi would send the draft to be signed by the chosen parliament of
Nepal. Hindi language would be forcibly enforced to replace Nepalese.
All the resources of Nepal would be pirated to strengthen India. Any
parliamentarian trying to vouch for building measures would be
marauded by the RAW as that sits on the neck. In the recent past the
democracy chosen by the people and rejected 240 years old monarchy,
would now mimic on those who laid their lives in pursuit of better
future of Nepal. Madhav Kumar the new prime minister and his selected
team will perform the role of a puppet hanging on a chain to please
the RAW having strings in its hands and is now in a position to keep
China at arms length who was trying its best to bring fresh air in the
country by creating road & rail linkage and strengthening muscles of
the politicians.
 
What a trauma! India is ready to release Rs. 56.25 million aid to
Kathmandu in the guise of SAARC development plan as stated by the
Indian ambassador and Nepalese Foreign Secretary who inked four
separate Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) aimed at fostering
cooperation. This is a visible bribe offered to Nepal on the success
of Indian conspiracy against Nepal.
 
BACK TO THE FUTURE
India is enamoured of launching offensive by sending her Army to the
neighbouring countries to support her pusillanimous act without
realizing its repercussions. Indian Army was sent to China in 1962 and
had bled through nose, in 1965 was defeated by the Pakistan Army, in
1971 sent her troops inside East Pakistan and the result is now facing
the two Muslim countries, in the year 1987, India  moved her forces to
Sri lanka & had to face a massive defeat and was forced to be driven
out miserably. Of course RAW can claim credit for creating fidget in
Sikkim and then merger of Sikkim in to the Indian state and also
engineering a bizarre drama in the Maldives while dispatching her
troops and capturing this sovereign state of Maldives within 24 hours.
In light of the same South Asian Group, has analytically examined that
Indian leadership being totally shameless, disregardful and alien to
the norms of ethics as well so intoxicated with the idea of
expansionism, fed by the RAW  which  is so stupid as writes B. Raman a
famous journalist that in future, sure enough will have to go for the
military adventurism to take over Nepal but this will not be that easy
a prey for her to digest it like Sikkim or Maldives.
 
There is a dire need of having a potent, collective& dynamic force of
South Asian Countries to sort out the Bastard and her RAW THE RASCAL
who are entering in to the domain of every sovereign country thus
putting their independence at stake and as well the politicians of
Nepal to come out of the slumber lurking in hibernation and read what
has been written on the wall "the hogs are galling the peace of
Nepal".
 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fw: RE: US on war trial, BDR deaths





--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Zoglul Husain <zoglul@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
Question: When do the salespersons and the US diplomats lie? Answer: As soon as their lips move. Well, this may be a joke, but not without its ad verbatim application in many cases.
 
The visiting US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, Robert O. Blake resorted to most blatant lies when he said, "Your country just had the freest and fairest election in your history… democracy is being strengthened." The US is saying that in Chorus with India. As regards Bangladesh, CIA and RAW sing the same tunes. Strategic partners indeed!! The US installed 'democracy' in Iraq and Afghanistan. They, in league with India, installed 'democracy' in Bangladesh through 29 December 2008 election. It will need the most gullible of all to be beguiled by them. We will, however, resist their manoeuvres in Bangladesh.
 
The high court was brought to its knees during the military controlled interim government. It was made to carry out the instructions from behind the scenes. It even failed to file a suit against the most atrocious and violent attacks on the high court itself! The ACC also was said to have filed '80 percent' politically motivated cases. About 500,000 people were arrested. Torture was common and there were reports of huge extortions of money. The BNP was demolished by arrest and by driving them away from their localities. Finally elections were held under military deployment. It was the most rigged and most unfair election in our history. The results were premeditated and most ruthlessly 'achieved'. 
 
Please see the following biography (From the US Department of State, internet):
Photo of Robert O. Blake
Robert O. Blake
Ambassador
Term of Appointment: 05/26/2009 to present

Bob Blake is a career Foreign Service Officer. Ambassador Blake entered the Foreign Service in 1985.. He has served at the American Embassies in Tunisia, Algeria, Nigeria and Egypt. He held a number of positions at the State Department in Washington, including senior desk officer for Turkey, Deputy Executive Secretary, and Executive Assistant to the Under Secretary for Political Affairs. Ambassador Blake served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Mission in New Delhi, India from 2003 – 2006, as Ambassador to Sri Lanka and Maldives from 2006 to mid-2009, and as Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs from May 2009 to the present.
Mr. Blake earned a B.A. from Harvard College in 1980 and an M.A. in international relations from Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) in 1984.

  

 


Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:36:47 -0700
From: bd_mailer@yahoo.com
Subject: US on war trial, BDR deaths
To: dhakamails@yahoogroups.com

US on war trial, BDR deaths

Calls for fair trial, probe

The US has urged Bangladesh to be cautious in trying war criminals of 1971, saying the issue should not be politicised. No action should be taken that might be considered a mechanism to weaken democracy in the country, said visiting US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Robert O Blake yesterday.
 
About numerous custodial deaths of Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) soldiers being investigated in connection with the recent mutiny in the border security force, he said the matter should be probed seriously and persons responsible for the deaths should be brought to justice.
 
"We talked how it is important for the government to investigate those, to carry out a credible investigation and to bring those, who might have been responsible for the deaths in custody, to justice," Blake said referring to his meetings with Bangladesh government leaders.
 
He underscored the need for investigating all extra judicial killings as well.
"In all our discussions with our friends in the government of Bangladesh, we emphasised the importance of investigating those extra judicial killings, and bringing those responsible for those killings, to justice," he said.
 
He however avoided a direct reply to a question regarding whether the US supports Bangladesh government's move to try war criminals."Let me say on the question of war crimes, that the United States believes strongly in the importance of accountability, but in my discussion with our friends here in the government, we also urged for this not to be a politicised issue," he told journalists.
 
"Your country just had the freest and fairest election in your history… democracy is being strengthened. It's important that no action be taken that could be considered by the people of Bangladesh as a mechanism to weaken democracy, and undermine the progress that has been made," Blake said at a media briefing in the American Club.
 
He said Bangladesh government must walk a very fine line and maintain a fine balance in respect to war crimes trials.Blake, who came to Dhaka on a two-day visit on Saturday, met Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, Home Minister Sahara Khatun, and Foreign Minister Dipu Moni yesterday.
 
He also had talks with Leader of the Opposition in Parliament Khaleda Zia, members of the civil society, and the business community on Saturday.
"I wanted to see first hand, how we can work with the new government here and the people, to expand the good cooperation we already enjoy. My visit is to show the importance of the relationship of our two countries," said Blake, whose visit to Bangladesh was his first since being appointed to his current post.
 
He said although his visit was short, he learnt a great deal about Bangladesh, and was impressed with the important changes that had happened here, and the opportunities that had been created.Elaborating on the outcomes of his talks with the leaders of the country, Blake said he offered cooperation in strengthening democracy, ensuring development, clean energy, dealing with climate change, and in countering extremism and terrorism.
 
"Not only the maritime security aspect, but security at land borders are also required, to make sure that terrorist groups like Jamaatul Mujahideen Bangladesh, and transnational terrorist groups cannot use the territory of Bangladesh, and operate from Bangladesh to threaten their own country and other nations," said Blake, supporting Dhaka's move to form a South Asian joint taskforce to combat terrorism in the region. He, however, made it clear that the US has no role to play in the proposed taskforce.
 
"We will continue to support Bangladesh as it extends its democratic roots. We also are here to help you develop your economy, to help you protect your people against terrorist threats, and from those who wish to destabilise your democracy," he said...
 
He appreciated Bangladesh's effort to expand women's literacy, and the government's move to reform madrasa education through modernising the curriculum, which he said, could spread to parts of the Arab world too.
Asked about sustaining democracy in Bangladesh when the opposition is boycotting the parliament, Blake said his government welcomed the 'freest, fairest and most transparent elections in the history of Bangladesh'.
"At the same time Bangladesh faces new challenges, the finance minister just delivered the budget speech, and in many ways this now is a new beginning…a new beginning for the opposition and for the government to work together. The US government hopes that the opposition will participate in the new parliament and work constructively with the government to not only exploit the new opportunities, but also to face the challenges."
 
He said he was carrying a message of friendship on behalf of the Obama administration. "Now with new governments here and in the United States, we believe there are opportunities to expand our friendship and cooperation."
Asked whether the US has any plan or programme to help Bangladesh in mitigating and adapting to climate change, he said, "We are just beginning the discussion. I myself is not the person responsible for it…we have special negotiators, and I will be going back to talk to my colleagues about some of the possibilities..."
 
Blake said climate is one of many new areas in which his government thinks it might have cooperation with Bangladesh.On President Obama's recent visit to Cairo, he said the US president is committed to improving relationship with the Muslim world, based on mutual interests and respect.Robert O Blake left Dhaka late last night.
 



Beyond Hotmail — see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more.



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] National anthem at schools



as a young student in Karachi, in 1970, i was not sure why I have to decide ....if i am a bangali
1st...or a muslim 1st??

Is it not more important to perform well...as a muslim and as a Bangali?

We have spent lot of hours and energy, debating about such trivial, meaningless matters.

It is time to offer a helping hand to needy, poor and helpless, whether you are a bangali/ or a muslim!

Cheers.

Khoda hafez.

dr. maqsud omar









To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: akbar_50@hotmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:52:00 +0000
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] National anthem at schools



While working in Rawalpindi in 1970 I was asked by a Pakistani gentleman about my identity whether I am a Muslim or Bengali first. I proudly identified myself as a Bengali then a Muslim. Naturally he was not happy and confirmed his conviction that breaking up of Pakistan was just a matter of time. This incident came back to me again in relation to the current debate on singing of the national anthem in Bangladeshi madrassas. This is a serious gap in achieving the goal of a unified nation in Bangladesh. The reluctance of the Islamic clergy to accept traditional Bengali culture as a dominant force in shaping this young and sovereign nation is a contentious issue. The madrassa education which produces a clergy class carries a diametrically opposite ideology which works against creating a unified Bengali nation. The sharia taboo against music and songs in Islam is based on ignorance. A handful of Islamic fundamentalists like the Taliban's use brute force to enforce this taboo but the vast majority of the Muslims do not share their repulsive views. As religion is always a divisive force it always tries to block progress and universal understanding. In a society like Bangladesh where modern education is yet reach every citizen this situation will continue to plague the nation. But the patriotic forces must continue the struggle.

 

Akbar Hussain

Canada


 


To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: ezajur.rahman@q8.com
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:33:21 +0300
Subject: [ALOCHONA] National anthem at schools



National anthem at schools

http://www.newagebd.com/2009/jun/13/fb.html
The singing of the national anthem in madrassahs is long overdue. But the truth is no nation willingly separates its young citizens from such a young age driving them into different worlds which seldom coincide. It is our irresponsibility that has brought us to this situation. State managed seminaries, with broad consultation, can develop the religious men who will lead our congregations in prayer. But the vast majority of madrassah students should be sitting beside their fellow citizens in the classrooms of regular government schools. Many will argue about this but I have never met a successful man who studied at a madrassah and then sent his own son to a madrassah. We are tearing the soul of our country apart and we have been doing so for a long time.
   Ezajur Rahman
   Kuwait

 





Windows Live helps you keep up with all your friends, in one place.



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fw: Re: Agitation against General Moin and others





--- On Mon, 6/15/09, abid bahar <abidbahar@yahoo.com> wrote:
Moin U , the Mir Jaffor of Bangladesh
While Mir Jaffor betrayed with the people of Bengal in favour of the British, Moin U betrayed with the people of Bangladesh for India. The latter should be investigated, the Indian horses should be confiscated, and he should be caught and tried. Unfortunately, Hasina opened the Asian highway for him and others to escape.


From: Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo.com>
To: Dhaka Mails <dhakamails@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 4:45:29 AM
Subject: Agitation against General Moin and others

Agitation against General  Moin and others
 
http://www.amadershomoy.com/content/2009/06/15/middle0510.htm
 
http://bdnews24.com/details.php?id=87298&cid=2





__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Protesters burn Moeen’s effigies, demand his trial



 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

aStudents and political activists across the country on Monday went out on demonstrations against the just retired chief of army staff, Moeen U Ahmed, burning his effigies and asking the government to put him on trial for violating the constitution by going beyond his professional jurisdiction.
   Effigies of the former military chief were burnt on the Dhaka University campus and elsewhere in the capital, and Sylhet and demonstrations were held at district headquarters.
   Echoing the sentiment, BNP standing committee member Moudud Ahmed demanded trial of Moeen along with five other military officers. 'Six military officers, including Moeen, had orchestrated… all designs and work plans to turn Bangladesh into a depoliticised and ineffectual state,' he said at a briefing at his office.
   He called on the government to constitute an all-party probe committee for holding the trial as 'they tainted the image of the military' during the emergency rule by trying to implement their own agenda.
   The demonstrators asked the government bring charges of 'sedition' against Moeen for breaching the constitution and demanded his exemplary punishment for 'machinations' to impose a prolonged state of emergency withholding basic rights of the people and conspiring to destroy practice of democracy and political institutions.
   Students at Dhaka University brought out a procession under the banner of Students' Movement against Repression, a platform backed by Jatiyatabadi Chhatra Dal, associate body of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, and held a rally at Aparajeya Bangla where the speakers held Moeen responsible for oppression on the students of the university and elsewhere centring on a trifling matter on August 21, 2007.
   The student leaders said Moeen had resorted to repression on students and arrested teachers in a bid to control educational institutions, especially the Dhaka University, which had a glorious history of movement against military rule.
   Speakers at the rally also accused Moeen of targeting student leaders and arresting them to silence their voice against the pseudo-military rule.
   Many of the students, arrested and tortured by the military in August 2007, were yet to recover from the injuries and trauma, they said. After the rally, the demonstrators burnt an effigy of Moeen.
   New Age correspondent in Rajshahi reports: The city and district unit of BNP's associate body of students, Jatiyatabadi Chhatra Dal, took out a procession in the city demanding arrest of Moeen 'on charge of sedition.'
   Several hundred activists of JCD joined in the procession chanting slogans against Moeen branding him 'an enemy of the people.'
   The protesters held a rally on the Rajshahi College campus where speakers held Moeen responsible for unleashing a reign of terror by wholesale arrest of politicians and businessmen.
   Chhatra Dal's city unit president Abul Kalam Azad Sweet, general secretary Mahfuzur Rahman Riton and Mahbub Alam Kochi spoke at the rally.
   Reports from Khulna said the district and city units of BNP held a rally in front of its office on KD Ghosh Road demanding trial of Moeen U Ahmed for his activities during the two years of the military-controlled interim administration.
   Presided over by former BNP lawmaker M Nurul Islam, the rally was addressed by BNP lawmaker Nazrul Islam Monju, former lawmaker Kazi Sekendar Ali Dalim, Syeda Nargis Ali, and senior joint-convener of Khulna district BNP, Shafiqul Alam Mona.
   The speakers accused Moeen of hatching conspiracies to destroy BNP, depoliticise the country and banish democracy.
   After the rally, the party activists marched down the city streets.
   New Age correspondent in Sylhet reports: several hundred students and people paraded the city in a procession chanting slogans against the just retried military chief.
   Under the banner of Students-People against Repression, the protest march was organised by the activists of Jatiyatabadi Chhatra Dal. They burnt an effigy of Moeen at Court Point.
   Speakers at a brief rally asked the government to try Moeen and give him exemplary punishment so that nobody in future would dare to violate the constitution.
   New Age correspondent in Magura said the district unit BNP in a meeting demanded exemplary punishment of Moeen for breaching the constitution.

 

http://www.newagebd.com/2009/jun/16/front.html




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fw: RE: Motiur Rahman on Army





--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Zoglul Husain <zoglul@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
It was Mahfuz Anam (Daily Star), Motiar Rahman (Prothom Alo) and Devapriyo Bhattacharya (CPD), who were at the forefront of the propaganda for the military-controlled interim government. They served India against the interests of Bangladesh. Is Motiar Rahman trying to delude the people again?  
 

Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:23:06 -0700
From: bd_mailer@yahoo.com
Subject: Motiur Rahman on Army
To: dhakamails@yahoogroups.com

Motiur Rahman on Army
 



Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more.



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [ALOCHONA] Fw: [chottala.com] Zia That I Knew: A Flashback



Mr. Ghosh;
Where did you get that information? If Zia was "court martialed" and removed from 'Z' force, who ran the 'Z' force after him. The name 'Z' comes from the first initial of his name, without him, there will be no 'Z' force.

Many of you cannot stand the fact that Zia was one of the leading freedom fighters who led our independence war as most of the so called "freedom fighting politicians" were busy doing R&R in Kolkata.If you are a Bangladeshi, instead of slandering his reputation, at least you can show some respect for his participation in the liberation war.

Tell me this, if he was indeed court martialed, what made the country decorate him with a "Bir Uttam" title after all?
Anwar

--- On Fri, 6/12/09, Aniruddha Ghose <anrdghs@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Aniruddha Ghose <anrdghs@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Fw: [chottala.com] Zia That I Knew: A Flashback
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 7:19 AM



Can you please tell me why Zia was "Court Martialed" and later on removed from Z force during the War of Independence!!!!


From: Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo.com>
To: Dhaka Mails <dhakamails@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 5:26:54 AM
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Fw: [chottala.com] Zia That I Knew: A Flashback



--- On Thu, 5/28/09, chottalasultan@ yahoo.com <chottalasultan@ yahoo.com> wrote:


Dear Mr. Abu Obaid Chowdhury,

    Thanks for sharing this rich article with the community!  I salute your heroic contribution to the liberation of Bangladesh .  Your graphic description of the valiant actions of Zia and other freedom fighters should be recorded in text and in motion pictures. 

    Yes, indeed I respectfully recall the fondest memory of Shaheed Zia of Bangladesh .  I heard his repeated announcement in Chittagong "I declare the independence of Bangladesh.. ....,"  later modified "I declare the independence of Bangladesh under the direction of our great leader Bangobandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman ......,";  "I call upon all peace loving countries of the world to come forward to stop the genocide being committed by the Pakistani military on unarmed Bengalis..."  "I instruct all able bodied men to gather at Laldighir Par and follow instructions from captains Bhuiya, Shamsher, and Khalequzzaman, and Major Rafiq on our preparation for resisting the enemy....."  "Protishod, Protishod Amra Neboi...." 

     No Bangladeshi could ignore the roaring Tiger's call for bearing arms for his/her motherland; women, children, and octogenarian elders were fired up hearing this voice of hope and liberty on Chittagong Radio (when all radio and newspapers were silent) when all Bangladeshis were waiting in dismay and for directions.  I was fortunate to have gone to Laldighir Par along with other Junior Cadet Corps (JCC) and Fauzderhat Cadet College (FCC) cadets to answer that call!  On March 28 at dusk, we faced three truck loads of scouting sailors from Pakistani war ship PNS Babar at Katcha Rastar Matha (the junction of Dhaka Trunk Road and road to EPR Chittagong HQ in Halishahar).  All of them were dead from firing from the EPR jawans on the rooftop of Pakistan Radio (warehouse?) building roof and from the ditch behind Nahar Manzil at Katcha Rastar Matha.  Approx. 3 to 5 EPR jawans were also shaheed in the fight.  The three destroyed Paki truck remained on the land across from the Radio building, and this spot became the vengeance point of Paki military after they took over Chittagong with reinforcement from Comilla and Dhaka cantonments starting on March 29!   On the 26th March, the nation tasted freedom, and the journey continued for a free Bangladesh on December 16th 1971--a sterling feat--achieved by all Bangladeshi civilian and military freedom fighters in the history of world in achieving independence in less than one year of war!!!

     Zia was a disciplined and patriotic solider and true son of the soil.  Despite his tremendous captainship for our liberation and misgivings thereafter, he followed the chain of command under civilian rule of Bangobondhu.  As the head of state post-1975 tragic events, he proved himself to be a visionary working through wee hours, traveling around the world securing diplomatic recognition and economic assistance for the war ravaged country, establishing a multi-party democratic system in the country, uplifting the confidence of countrymen, re-establishing discipline in academic environment (remember open book exam halls with weapon to threaten the invigilators and almost 100% passing rate!), and the list goes on....  Even at the poking of cronies and 'toshamodies,' Zia did not demean Bangobondhu and insisted that the history will appropriately recognize his great contributions; not a single street or monument bearing Bangobondhu Sk. Mujib's name was changed during Zia's administration.  I heard first hand accounts from the pre-independence Bangladeshi military officers in Paki army on how Zia guided them in choosing their career in East Bengal Regiment and mentored them. 

     I met this visionary man for the last time in early 1981 during one of his several shuttle diplomacy visits in the Middle East, but cannot forget his expressed zeal for achieving a confident and prosperous Bangladesh !  My thoughts and prayers for all of our leaders –Sk. Mujibur Rahman, Ziaur Rahman, Tajuddin Ahmed, Monsur Ali, Syed Nazrul Islam, Moulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhasani, Fazlul Haque, Gen. MAG Osmani, Capt. Gani—and all people who loved and worked for pre- and post-independent Bangladesh.  I would like to recommend that Bangladesh should adopt a National Leaders Day to recognize all its leaders—in the U.S. , Presidents Day holiday is celebrated to recognize all presidents of the country.    

     Regards.   

                   Sultan Chowdhury

                   Mayrland, USA


--- On Tue, 5/26/09, bd_mailer@yahoo. com <bd_mailer@yahoo. com> wrote:

From: bd_mailer@yahoo. com <bd_mailer@yahoo. com>
Subject: [khabor.com] Zia That I Knew: A Flashback
To: "Dhaka Mails" <dhakamails@yahoogro ups.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 11:13 AM

Zia That I Knew: A Flashback

Abu Obaid Chowdhury New York, USA
 

 

Following my defection from Pakistan Army in 1971 and after being cleared by the Indian and Mujibnagar authorities, I was posted to 'Z Force' of Lt Col Ziaur Rahman in the eastern theater of Bangladesh liberation war. The nearly 20-day journey took me from Lahore to Khemkaran to Ferozepur to Delhi to Kolkata to Agartala and finally to Masimpur, the 4 sector headquarters of Lt Col C R Dutta (later Major General).
 
As I reached my temporary accommodation, I heard a familiar voice next room. He was talking to Col Dutta. I went to check and found a gentleman in uniform, somewhat tired, half lying on the bamboo made platform, used as bed. It was dark and I could not see the face clearly. I wished him and introduced myself. He sat down and said, "So you are the Captain who came to raise my artillery unit. Sit down."
 
I still could not make out who the person was, though looked familiar. 2/Lt Sajjad Ali Zahir (later Lt Col), another defectee from West Pakistan and posted to my unit, joined me at Agartala. He followed me to the room. As I introduced Sajjad to the man, almost instantly the name flashed across my mind.
 
"He is Col Ziaur Rahman", I said to Sajjad. Earlier, then Major Ziaur Rahman was an instructor in the military academy when I was a cadet and his solid, deep voice was well known to me.On his query, I had to tell Col Zia my defection story—how I crossed the Lahore-Khemkaran border in a military jeep, how I survived after falling with the jeep in the Kasur River, who I reported to at India's Rajoke cantonment etc. He seemed to know the route and area pretty well. Somewhat surprised, I asked how he knew the names of those villages, tracks, BRB canal, barriers etc. "I was fighting the Indians there in 1965 with 1 E Bengal Regiment", Zia said.
 
After dinner, Zia left for his headquarters at Kailashahar. Before leaving he told me to take stock of my unit at Kukital and report to him in a day or two to find out what I needed to make the unit battle worthy within the shortest possible time. Capt Oli Ahmed (later Col and BNP Minister) and my Sialkot time friend Capt M A Halim (later Maj Gen), Brigade Major and Quartermaster respectively at Z Force, were very helpful in providing me with the material support I needed.
 
Whole Bangladesh is Firing Range
About two weeks later, Col M A G Osmani (later General and Minister), C-in-C of the Mukti Bahini, was visiting the area. Zia brought him to my camp with a view to showing the readiness of my guns for operation. I arranged a mock gun firing drill for the visiting team. Lt (later Capt and late) Sheikh Kamal, ADC to the C-in-C, told me afterwards, "Sir, the C-in-C was very impressed with the exercise. I heard him saying so to Col Zia." Of course, Osmani himself appreciated the preparedness and congratulated those who participated in the drill. At the luncheon at my camp, I asked him if I could conduct a practice firing before going to the real one, for which I needed a firing range.
"The whole Bangladesh is your firing range, my boy", said Osmani, "go ahead." He gave me a blank check.
 
After a day or two, while returning from forward positions, I noticed a large convoy of vehicles carrying soldiers passing by. Initially I thought they were Indians, but with a closer look I recognized they were our Mukti Bahini soldiers. In those days, we had the same OG (olive green) uniform worn by the Indian army in that area. After a while, I found Col Zia coming in a jeep. He stopped when he saw me. I asked him what was all that.
 
"That's my 1st Bengal", Zia brimmed with pride."Where are they going?" I asked.He got off his jeep and asked me to follow him. We went up on a high ground from where we could oversee the convoy passing."They are going to Atgram, to take up positions in preparation for the attack on the Pakistanis", Zia said as he was preparing to sit down. He briefly explained the plan for a 3-prong attack in north eastern Sylhet with his 1st, 3rd and 8th Bengal regiments.

"Am I not part of your brigade?" I asked, suppressing my disappointment.
"Of course you are", Zia asserted.
"Then why am I left out of this?" I demanded.
"Are you ready?" he asked me.
"Anytime", I replied.
I cannot describe in words the expression of happiness and pride that I noticed in Zia's face at that moment.
 
"Fine", he said, "you are going in support of 8th Bengal, possibly tonight. On my way, I will talk to Brigadier (I don't remember the name who was Zia's Indian support counterpart) to issue the ammunition and gun towers (trucks) to you on a priority basis. See me at headquarters later tonight. I will give you further details."
My excitement knew no bounds and was about to run away to arranged the details for the D-day I was waiting for.
 
Fight the War Our Way
"Wait, sit down", Col Zia stopped me, "there is time. Give me company while I see my unit clear away." As the convoy moved on, our discussion shifted to different directions. I told him how Pakistanis in the west had been conducting misleading propaganda about our war, our heroes and our future. In Pakistan, Zia and many others were already dead. I discovered a different Zia from the reclusive and serious one that most people knew. It looked like he wanted to open his mind.
 
We talked about the war, the strategy, its conduct and the policy makers in Mujibnagar. He expressed his frustration at the style and pace the war was going. He didn't like too much dependence on India for the conduct of our war.
 
"It is our war, we should fight it our way, not on someone else's convenience", he said. He did not hide his dislike for Col Osmani, the Mukti Bahini chief. "That man with white moustache", Zia said referring to Osmani, "has no idea about the situation in the war fronts and the enemy. Just passing orders off the map at someone else's dictation. I don't like it".
 
I was a bit embarrassed that he would open up like that with a subordinate and junior officer. But I also knew Zia, for whatever reasons, developed a liking for me and could confide. Our association continued till I met the president last in September 1980.
 
The sun was setting when we got up to leave. I told Col Zia that I could be late to reach his headquarters tonight because I had a number of errands to complete before I moved out. "Don't worry", Zia assured me, "I don't go to bed early". I later learnt that Zia usually worked till early hours of the morning in those days. He slept very little.
 
I came to Zia's headquarters around 11 pm and found him working in his tent, dimly lighted by a lantern. Our meeting was brief. He showed me the deployment of 8 Bengal Regiment off the map and I was to place guns suitably to support its attacks and advances. He called his BM Capt Oli and DQ Capt Halim to provide me whatever I needed.
 
My unit's first operation in Baralekha, Sylhet was a huge success. Next morning, an overjoyed Col Zia, accompanied by Capt Oli, visited my gun position. Greeting with a warm handshake, he told me, "You made history in our liberation war". He went round and shook hands and congratulated every man I had. Before Col Zia left, I told him that I would be going to the forward locations of 8 Bengal as FOO (Forward Observation Officer) soon.
"Make sure the gun position is well taken care of. These guns are very precious for us", Zia advised.

"It is in good hand, sir", I assured him.
Sometime in 1973, then army deputy chief Maj Gen Ziaur Rahman was on a visit to Chittagong where I was a staff officer to Col (later Lt Gen and BNP Minister) Mir Shawkat Ali, the local commander. At a luncheon for Zia at the commander's Flag Staff House where Brigadier Khalilur Rahman (later Maj Gen, Defense Adviser to Khandakar Mushtaque and AL MP), just repatriated from Pakistan, was also present. Zia and Khalil were discussing our liberation war. At one stage, Zia called me to tell the brigadier how I raised my artillery unit and how long it took me to train and make it ready for the war.
"The whole thing took me less than 3 weeks", I said.

A skeptical brigadier asked, "If you are given the men and material, would you be able to accomplish the same now?"
"Definitely, sir; however, it may take a little longer time," I replied.
"Please bear in mind, sir", I added, "it was wartime, that too a liberation war. Our only mission was to fight and win. We used every minute of our time, day and night, to get ready. I had some excellent trained artillery men from former Pakistan army. They formed the core, the rest were ordinary soldiers, students and others.
 
You got to see their spirit to believe it, sir. The beauty was, the unit that went to operation on a Ramadan afternoon without prior practice firing, had its very first shell falling right on the target, a Pakistani concentration in Baralekha, Sylhet, readying for an attack on 8 Bengal positions. That unexpected (Pakistanis never knew before that Mukti Bahini had artillery power) and devastating artillery shelling forced the disarrayed enemy to start a process of retreat leading to a complete defeat in that area."
I could see a proud Gen Zia enjoying our conversation standing nearby. He perhaps desired to highlight my contributions in our liberation war to the one who missed that chance.
 
The Revolt in Chittagong
Once at Kailashahar, Capt Oli told me the story how 8 E Bengal revolted at Halishahar in Chittagong on the night of March 25, 1971. The facts were later corroborated by Major Shamsher M Chowdhury, a batch mate (later Foreign Secretary and Ambassador to the US), Brigadier Chowdhury Khaluquzzaman (later Ambassador), and Capt Mahfuzur Rahman (later Lt Col and hanged following the assassination of Zia). They were all serving in 8 Bengal at that time.
 
Lt Col M R Chowdhury of East Bengal Recruits' Center (EBRC), Major Ziaur Rahman, Second-in-Command of 8 Bengal, Capt Rafiqul Islam (later Major and AL Minister) of East Pakistan Rifles and a few other officers had a number of secret coordinating meetings in Chittagong to cope with the situation if Pakistanis attacked the Bengalis. They sent messages to Sheikh Mujibur Rahman to inform that Pakistanis were preparing to disarm and attack the Bengali elements of the military and sought his advice and direction. They did not receive any. (Please see "A Tale of Millions" by Major Rafiqul Islam.)
On the night of March 25, 1971, operation Search Light, designed to annihilate the Bengalis by Pakistan Army, started in the cantonments, including Chittagong. Shamsher confirmed that elements of 20 Baluch and 31 Punjab regiments were advancing towards Halishahar. 8 Bengal then decided to revolt and resist the Pakistanis.
 
They arrested the Pakistani officers, including the Commanding Officer Lt Col Rashid Janjua (these officers were later killed) and wanted Ziaur Rahman to take command. At that moment, Zia was being taken, under naval escorts, to the Chittagong port, ostensibly to help unload the Chinese armaments from HMV Swat. According to other versions, Zia was actually on his way to his final journey! Khaliquzzaman rushed to get Zia and luckily found him waiting by the roadside while his escorts were clearing a barricade at Agrabad area. Khaliquzzaman whispered to Zia of the decision of 8 Bengal and then went to the navy Lt to say that Col Ansari, the new Punjabi Commandant at the EBRC, wanted Zia at Chittagong cantonment immediately. The Punjabi Lt did not suspect any foul play.
 
Zia and Khaliquzzaman rushed to the unit and found a truncated unit ready for action. Half of the men deserted out of fear and confusion. Major Shawkat recently arrived from Quetta after completing staff college course and was temporarily appointed Adjutant of 8 Bengal. As he was new in the unit, other officers could not take him into confidence at first. Some young officers were not sure if Shawkat was a Bengali at all. Shawkat was at his quarter and knew nothing about all that was going in the unit at that moment. Upon arrival, Zia went to Shawkat and asked if he would join the revolt. Shawkat thought for a while and then decided to join the group.
 
Though 8 Bengal readied itself to meet the attacking Pakistanis, they were outnumbered. Zia decided to fall back to Kalurghat and reorganize. They fought pitch battles and suffered heavy casualties in the process. Capt Harun Ahmed Chowdhury (later Maj Gen and Ambassador), Shamsher and others were mortally wounded and captured by the Pakistanis.
 
Here on March 27, 1971, Zia made his famous declaration of independence at the Kalurghat Radio Station. According to Oli, he was instrumental in the making of the declaration. He even claimed to have made Zia. Shamsher told me that he drafted the final version of the declaration. So much for the controversy over the declaration of independence made by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman on the night of March 25, 1971.
 
Audacity to Distort Zia's Role
Lately, a few AL ministers and parliamentarians started disputing Zia's participation in the war of liberation. Former minister Prof Abu Syed and one Dr. Mina Farah of New York, who chose to incinerate her Muslim son instead of burial, had the audacity to claim in recent talk shows that Zia was not a freedom fighter at all. I can only say that these persons need to get their brain checked.
 
Special Mission
In September 1980, I was sent to Dhaka on a special mission concerning military cooperation in one of the middle-eastern countries. My meetings with Minister Prof Shamsul Huq and Foreign Secretary SHMS Kibria were not positive. Army chief General H M Ershad and chief of the general staff Maj Gen Abdul Manaf were hesitant. I wanted to talk to the president. While I was waiting in the office of the Military Secretary to the President Col Sadequr Rahman Chowdhury in Bangabhaban, President Zia suddenly burst in and asked me, without any prelude, "What kind of proposal is it? How can we agree to this? We have no capability to undertake such a task. Besides, we can't afford to enter into a kind of rivalry with a superpower."
 
I understood the president came straight from the meeting deliberating on the same issue. While coming to the Bangabhaban, I saw Ershad there.
"Sir, give me a few minutes", I requested the president, "and I will explain the stake involved, how it can be made possible and what we stand to gain. There is no superpower rivalry, and I believe you were not given the correct picture by our foreign office." The president tried to defend the foreign office though.
 
We sat down and I stated what I thought right. I also said something to the president in confidence which only I could dare say. I pointed out that peripheral and invisible resources (I even listed those resources) of our military would be more than enough to make an initial commitment. In return, we can seek financial assistance and resources to raise more units, modernize, equip and train our forces. It would be an ongoing process.
That did the job! I could see a glow in the face of the president.
"Please do not say 'NO', sir," I begged the president, further adding, "for the first time, a rich friend requested Bangladesh for something".
 
"Wait a moment", he told me and turned to the MSP, "Sadeq, get hold of Ershad, he was leaving. I need to talk to him again". The president went out of the room and I was hoping for the best. After half an hour, the president came back and told me, "Ok, you tell them, we accept the proposal in principle. But, we need to discuss further. We may have to send a team of experts to examine the details".

"Thank you, sir. But, it needs to be conveyed by our foreign office", I humbly submitted."I will talk to the foreign minister," the president said.
A little relaxed, I now had time to exchange usual pleasantries with the president. At one stage, he picked up a newspaper, I thought it was Holiday, from the desk of the MSP and proudly showed me a news item that said Bangladesh would export certain type of quality rice.

"How can we do that?" It was my time to be surprised now.
"We will do it, you will see", asserted a confident president.
I later learnt that the Foreign Office maintained its original position. I felt a huge overseas opportunity for our defense forces was sabotaged. (I am unable to detail the opportunity here).
 
That was the last time I saw Shaheed President Ziaur Rahman.
After his death, I went to Bangladesh on vacation. My wife and I visited a bereaved Begum Zia at her residence. Brigadier Mahtab (late), an old friend, was with me. Begum Zia talked very little, but acknowledged receipt of my condolence letter. In course of our discussion, she asked me, "What do you think should happen now and how the things should be run?" I could not figure out what she meant. Mahtab clarified that who I should think to take the leadership and carry forward ideals of Zia at that juncture.
 
I was not prepared for such a question and had no idea what Begum Zia was trying to lead me to, least of all her political ambition. I just fumbled that if anybody could come close to the stature of Ziaur Rahman, I thought it would be General M A Manzur. Unfortunately, he was the man behind the assassination of the president. (At that time, we were made to believe it was Manzur who masterminded the bloody coup in Chittagong. Later, however, I had different view about Manzur's complicity.) I expressed my inability to name a successor to Zia.
 
Years later, I said to myself in retrospect, "Stupid, the right answer should have been: you Madam." In a letter to General Ershad commending his efforts in quelling the Chittagong rebellion, I said, 'given the peoples' love and respect Shaheed President Zia received (reportedly 2 million people gathered around Dhaka airport when his coffin was brought in from Chittagong and attended his final Janaza), a Zia-like death is worth million times'. I also submitted that he had huge responsibilities for the stability in the military, as well as the nation. Ershad was kind enough to reply saying he was 'working' on some ideas and would seek our support. I later learnt what he was 'working' on.
 
We Have Been Orphaned
I went to the Bangabhaban again, this time to see Justice Abdus Sattar, the acting president. As I was waiting at the office of Col S R Chowdhury, the MSP related an experience. While on a visit to Zia's mazaar at one night, he found an old man crying by the grave. Sadeq went to share the feelings and console the man. He came all the way from Rangpur to pay his respect to the shaheed president. "'Badsha' Zia had walked through my front yard", the old man continued to cry, "how can I forget that? We have been orphaned."
 
During a courtesy call on Maj Gen Mohabbat Jan Chowdhury (later Minister of Ershad), Director General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI), I asked how come his intelligence failed when such a tragedy took place in Chittagong? Gen Chowdhury said that they knew something was in the offing in Chittagong and warned the president accordingly, but the president did not take it seriously. They also reminded the president on more than one occasion that Gen Manzur was going out of control, often refused to follow orders and instructions from army headquarters and mostly did things his way. According to M J Chowdhury, the president never believed them; he would rather rebuke them (repatriated and non-freedom fighter officers) instead, saying that they were jealous of Manzur who was far more superior in intellect and competence.
 
A footnote: The President's rehabilitation of the repatriated officers in high positions in the military enraged the young freedom fighter officers. The coup that killed the president was staged by freedom fighter officers. During a discussion with Gen Manzur in his office in Chittagong in 1979, I discovered how bitter he was against the non-freedom fighters. At the same time, I knew Zia and Manzur enjoyed great cordiality, mutual confidence and close relation. After the November 7, 1975 Sepoy-Janata Uprising, situation in the military was almost out of control and its discipline was at its lowest. Zia brought in Brig Manzur from New Delhi, where he was the military adviser, and appointed him the chief of the general staff. It was Manzur who brought back order in the military.
 
Incorruptible Zia
President Ziaur Rahman's austere and honest lifestyle was legendary. Even his worst enemy can not dispute that. Critics, however, blamed him for doing little against corrupt practices of some of his ministers and political leaders.
In late 1972, I called on then Brigadier Zia at his residence to introduce my newly married wife. Other than being overwhelmed with the extraordinary beauty of Begum Zia, my wife noticed that Zia was wearing an ordinary leather sandal having repairs done.
 
It was a common knowledge what was found in Zia's broken suitcase at the Chittagong Circuit House following his assassination on May 30, 1981—a few change of clothes that included a torn vest.Here is a story I heard from Hussain Ahmed, a former IGP and Secretary. An SP came to his residence at a late hour of night with a request to cancel his posting to a distant place. A much annoyed IGP dismissed the request. Before leaving, the disappointed SP pointed to his accompanying gentleman who remained absolutely silent the whole time, "Sir, do you know him?" The IGP replied in negative.
 
"He is Mizanur Rahman, brother of the President", said the SP. Naturally, the IGP became a little soft and more accommodating now and asked the SP to see him in the office. He, however, did not recall if that request was ever met.
 
Later, the IGP casually related the story to Air Vice Marshal Islam, then DGFI. A day or two later, IGP's red phone rang at around 3 am. Somewhat disturbed to be awakened at that odd hour, he picked up the phone and received a thunder.
 
"I heard that b—— went to you for a favor?" It was the president and it took time for the IGP to understand what he was referring to. The IGP tried to pacify the president saying that his brother just accompanied the SP and did not utter a word at all. "I would like to have a full report tomorrow", the president insisted and dropped the phone.
 
Reportedly, president Ziaur Rahman sent out circulars to all departments that personal requests by his family members should be directed to him immediately.
 
Everybody knew the fact that Zia refused to intervene when his son Tarique was thrown out of Shaheen School. During an official visit to Zambia, High Commissioner A N Hamidullah was briefing the president on the program, repeatedly mentioning of an appointment with president's brother Rezaur Rahman who was working there as an engineer. The president did not like it. He rebuked the High Commissioner for putting his brother's appointment in the official program. "I know my brother is here. I will meet him at my own convenience, and it is my personal matter", the president reminded the High Commissioner.
 
Another story from Hussain Ahmed. The almost daily Bangabhaban evening meetings used to run for long hours and working dinners were served from the house. The menu was more than simple–rice or roti with one curry and dal. Minister Moudud Ahmed found difficulty to take that any more. At dinner time, he requested the president if he could be excused as he had promised his children to eat together. The president smiled and let him go.
 
One may recall that Ziaur Rahman introduced Toyota Corolla as the official car at all levels, including for himself. A few Mercedes that Bangabhaban had were used only for foreign dignitaries during official visits.
 
Alas, the Zia family seemed to have failed to keep the clean image that Zia had in his lifetime!









__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___