Banner Advertiser

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Re: [mukto-mona] Nobel Prize-winning scientist says he was forced to resign



His research all along had significant help from female assistants. Now that dementia is catching up on him, he cuts silly jokes on them. For a handsome guy like him, a few infatuations are likely. Young women shed a lot of tears when they fall in love. Young men unable to respond for any reason shouldn't cut jokes about it after three or four decades.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 17, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

For making a politically incorrect joke? We have to let people speak their minds even the contents could be offensive to certain people. Lets have one standard or no standard. Lets have the freedom to offend and be offended by others
 




On Monday, June 15, 2015 9:32 PM, "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Tim Hunt deserved what he got.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 15, 2015, at 2:34 PM, ANISUR RAHMAN anisur.rahman1@btinternet.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Human beings have become intolerant and extremely over-sensitive. Muslims get offended at the slightest criticism of Islam or even mention of the prophet; women feel insulted even if men praise them; Blacks get upset if a non-white man asks about the performance of a Black player; Jews consider ant-Semitic at the mere mention of Jews in world affairs. The world has gone bonkers.

- AR  



On Monday, 15 June 2015, 0:17, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
This is an example of political correctness run amok. The intent of the statement below, by Dr. Hunt, was to induce some humor in the speech; every speaker tries to do that to introduce lightness in the talk.
Who will truly believe in the literal meaning of this statement? Even his women colleagues and students did not understand the seriousness, given to the statement.
Political correctness is killing humor from mankind. People have become ultra-sensitive about everything.
On last Friday, I was listening to the radio on my way back home from office. The topic was multi-culturalism. The caller was saying that he attended a sensitivity training program in his job, and the trainer was giving some examples of insensitive statements. One of the statements was that – a white cannot ask a black – what's the score in the last night's Basketball game? This is now a racially charged statement.
I noticed – most males (Black or White) only talk about games in their leisure time; how else they will communicate and mingle.
Jiten Roy
______________________________________ 

Nobel Prize-winning scientist says he was forced to resign

Associated Press
By GREGORY KATZ 6 hours ago
FILE - A Monday Oct. 8, 2001 photo from files of Dr. Tim Hunt, winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine, in a laboratory in London. The Nobel Prize-winning British scientist has apologized Wednesday, June 10, 2015, for saying the
.
View photo
FILE - A Monday Oct. 8, 2001 photo from files of Dr. Tim Hunt, winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine, in a laboratory in London. The Nobel Prize-winning British scientist has apologized Wednesday, June 10, 2015, for saying the "trouble with girls" working in science labs is that it leads to romantic entanglements and harms science. Tim Hunt made the comments at the World Conference of Science Journalists in South Korea, according to audience members. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant, File)
LONDON (AP) — A week ago, Tim Hunt was a well-known Nobel Prize winner who was promoting science education throughout Europe and the world.
Today he's widely perceived as a sexist who has been stripped of most of his positions because of inappropriate comments about women in science.
Gone is his position with the European Research Council science committee, his role at the Royal Society, and his honorary post at University College London. He said Sunday he was fired from the latter, while the university has said only that his resignation was accepted.
Hunt's fall followed a speech Tuesday at the World Conference of Science Journalists in South Korea in which he said that girls cause trouble in labs because "you fall in love with them, they fall in love with you, and when you criticize them, they cry."
The comments caused an instant Twitter storm that quickly led to Hunt, 72, leaving his posts even as he apologized. He has said he had been trying to make a joke, but nevertheless stood by his comment that love affairs in the lab are disruptive to science.
He was vilified by many, including The Guardian's Anne Perkins, who wrote that his comments were "the educated man's version" of blaming rape victims because they were wearing short skirts before they were attacked.
Hunt, 72, laments that his cherished career is finished — and some prominent women scientists who thought his remarks were deeply offensive said Sunday the punishment may be too harsh.
Athene Donald, a leading physicist who is master of Churchill College at Cambridge University, said Hunt always enthusiastically supported her work when she served for five years as Gender Equality Champion at the university.
"I've spent a lot of time with him and I've never seen any sign of sexism," she told The Associated Press. "He has traveled the world since he got the Nobel Prize, talking to young audiences, male and female, giving so generously, and now he has been ruined."
Hunt won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2001 and later was made a knight.
Donald said his comments were "indefensible" but there have been no cases of women coming forward to say they were poorly treated by Hunt, or discriminated against in any way.
Ottoline Leyser, a former student of Hunt's who now directs the Sainsbury Laboratory at the University of Cambridge, said she was upset that Hunt's offensive comments could have a negative impact on young women considering a career in science but that his record is otherwise unblemished.
"All my interactions with him were very positive," she told the AP. "He was a very enthusiastic and inspirational teacher. I've no indications from my experience or from colleagues that he's in the slightest way sexist."
She said the speed with which news of his comments spread via social media has reinforced for many scientists the dangers of speaking to the press or to the public.
"We're all of us terrified," she said. "In this media age, when sound bites spread so quickly, an off-the-cuff remark after a lunch in some conference can suddenly result in the fatal destruction of your career."
  • University College London
  • Tim Hunt
  • Nobel Prize
  • European Research Council
View Comments (4707)






__._,_.___

Posted by: Kamal Das <kamalctgu@gmail.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Re: {PFC-Friends} Mark Zuckerberg wants everyone to read 'The Muqaddimah' : which contradicts the Quran completely



Man constructed their gods and goddesses with their own traits. But they are all divine. Sometimes they descend onto the earth or martya bhumi to save the human beings or to bring back order. Along with gods and goddesses, man also created 'asur' (demon) which is antonym of 'sur' (god). And there has been constant riverly between these two groups. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 16, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

How is it so? Devi Saraswati is in-charge of knowledge and education, Devi Lakshmi is in-charge of wealth and prosperity, Devi Ganga, the elder daughter of Himaloy-raj, is in-charge of water, Devi Durga (Parbati), the second daughter of the Himalaya-raj, is in-charge of strength and power, etc. So, I see many of these goddesses representing mostly earthly matters.
Jiten Roy
 

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Re: {PFC-Friends} Mark Zuckerberg wants everyone to read 'The Muqaddimah' : which contradicts the Quran completely

 
Goddesses weren't earthly except Luxmi.

Sent from my iPad



On Jun 16, 2015, at 5:52 AM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
In Mahabharat, the epic Indian mythology, Gods represent kings of various planets, who used to visit earth from there. Goddesses (Ganga, Saraswati, Durga, Lakhmi, etc.), on the other hand, represent earthly objects. 
Brahmah, Bishnu and Shib are the Trinity in Mahabharat, similar to the Trinity of the Greek and the Biblical mythologies.
Jiten Roy 

 

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Re: {PFC-Friends} Mark Zuckerberg wants everyone to read 'The Muqaddimah' : which contradicts the Quran completely

 
I am a member of the Biblical Archaeological Library. In one of the recently published articles it showed how Sun God was central in their concept of monotheism. Defining a star as a mass of gas that releases more heat than it absorbs, the solar system has two more stars, viz., Jupiter and Saturn. Now compare with Greek and Indian mythology, you find a trinity of Gods. The inhabitants on earth might have witnessed them competing for supremacy in the heaven.

Sent from my iPad



On Jun 15, 2015, at 4:32 AM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
We don't know which other parts of the universe, except earth, the need for God is felt. We know for sure, God is much needed on earth, and existence of earth and its content depends on Mother Nature, which won't exist without sun; sun is the sole caretaker of the Mother Nature. So, sun is the prime candidate for God. Many parts of the world sun is already worshipped as God.
Ancient Egyptians used to worship Ra, the Sun God, Greeks worship Helios, Native Americans worship Sun, Persians (Mithraism) worship Sun. The legend of Mithra may well have given birth to the Christian resurrection story. Many South East Asian religions, treat Sun as God.
Sun is almighty and omnipresent on all of us, and it fits the description of God, we know. I don't think anybody, including scientists, would have any trouble accepting Sun as the God. What do you think?
Jiten Roy

 

  
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 10:16 PM, "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Religion is based on the idea of a geocentric universe. It is also inherently patriarchal. Mother Nature needs a father God to be functional. No atheist denies the existence of the universe. Since Akhenaten the idea of God was based on Sun. With its appearance on the horizon, all luminaries lost their glory in heaven. It was also related with fertility of the soil. Thus priesthood grew among people having rudimentary knowledge of science. A branch of them became mortuaries creating the concept of afterlife. Rulers found it useful. Deprived mass could be kept calm with the carrot of reward in heaven.

Great scientific discoveries often were serendipitous. Many inventors didn't even believe in what they invented. Max Planck, for example, survived about four decades after his invention of Quantum Mechanics. Not for a day, he believed in it. Brian Josephson ended up in research on ghosts. Newton succumbed to Arian heresy. Obviously, even great scientists were not quite open minded.

Assassins grow not out of innocent people. They grow out of ignorance, desire for rewards here and afterlife. Blake defined innocents as those having knowledge and ignorants as those lacking it.

Arab conquerors encouraged science and philosophy for a few centuries. But after the Baghdad massacre the tendency became opposite. Anyone in doubt may read Bernard Lewis and P. K. Hitti and other authors of Islamic history.

Sent from my iPad



On Jun 12, 2015, at 5:56 AM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
You are right – the ultimate determinant of truth will be the science. Religion, on the other hand, is a hypothesis that can never be verified, but, there is no dearth of people to have complete faith in it.
Human beings are normally critical of everything due to natural survival instincts, but – brainwashing can change all that. Correct brainwashing can destroy peoples' mental faculty for criticism, no matter how harmful the effect of it is. Thus, assassins are manufactured out of the most innocent people in the society.
Jiten Roy
 

From: "Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Re: {PFC-Friends} Mark Zuckerberg wants everyone to read 'The Muqaddimah' : which contradicts the Quran completely

 
Agree! How would an objective mind have two contradictory positions simultaneously? Science can't be polluted with the idea like... God has all the answers. It does not and it never had!   
 




On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 10:24 PM, "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Belief in science keeps the door open to criticism and review while belief in religion closes it. Nobody can be a believer in both.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 10, 2015, at 5:43 AM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

This shows you really did not understand my post. If I say – Man is stronger than woman, you will perhaps show me some women wrestlers to prove that not all men are stronger than women.

You said: "One can simultaneously be strong believers in both science and religion."

You cannot selectively believe in science. That's a total nonsense. When someone disbelief science because it contradicts religious belief, he/she is only pretending to believe in science.

Jiten Roy


 

From: "Subimal Chakrabarty








__._,_.___

Posted by: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Fw: [KHABOR] নরেন্দ্র মোদী খালেদাকে তিনটি প্রশ্ন করেছিলেন......



Ziaur Rahman did not understand the geopolitical reality after the independence, but why - BNP still does not understand it is a mystery.
Ziaur Rahman introduced expired Muslim League ideology in BNP, without understanding the reality that this ideology expired with the independence of Bangladesh.
BNP is still banking on the same expired ideology, and that why it got engaged in smuggling truckloads of arms and ammunitions to the rebel groups in the North-Eastern Indian territories. By doing so, BNP punctured its life-vest. So, this party cannot survive in the long run.
 
Jiten Roy


From: "Muhammad Ali man1k195709@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 11:28 PM
Subject: [mukto-mona] Fw: [KHABOR] নরেন্দ্র মোদী খালেদাকে তিনটি প্রশ্ন করেছিলেন......

 


On Monday, June 15, 2015 7:21 AM, "Gonojagoron Moncho projonmochottar@gmail.com [khabor]" <khabor@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
"নরেন্দ্র মোদী খালেদাকে তিনটি প্রশ্ন করেছিলেন, ভারতের রাষ্ট্রপতি প্রণব মুখার্জির সঙ্গে সাক্ষাৎ কেন বানচাল করা হল, সেদিন কাদের হরতাল ছিল। বেগম জিয়া বলেছেন, জোট যৌথভাবে হরতাল ডেকেছিল।
"চট্টগ্রাম বন্দরে অবৈধভাবে অস্ত্র খালাস করে ভারতীয় বিচ্ছিন্নতাবাদীদের দেওয়ার যে আয়োজন হয়েছে, সেখানে আপনার ক্যাবিনেটের গুরুত্বপূর্ণ সদস্য সরাসরি জড়িত ছিল। খালেদা এর জবাব দিতে পারেননি।"
"তৃতীয় প্রশ্ন ছিল, বর্ধমানে বিস্ফোরণে আপনার জোটসঙ্গীর জড়িত থাকার কথা যৌথ তদন্তে উঠে এসেছে। খালেদা জিয়া কোনো জবাব দিতে পারেননি।"
নরেন্দ্র মোদীর সফরে গত ৭ জুন বৈঠকে কী আলোচনা হয়েছে, সে বিষয়ে এখনও মুখ খোলেননি বিএনপি চেয়ারপারসন। তিনি শুধু বলেছেন, 'ফলপ্রসূ' আলোচনা হয়েছে।  
তবে ওই বৈঠকের আলোচনা নিয়ে ভারতের বিভিন্ন সংবাদপত্রের প্রতিবেদন উদ্ধৃত করে বলা যায়, "মোদীর সঙ্গে দেখা করে খালেদা বাংলাদেশে গণতন্ত্র নেই বলে নালিশ করেছেন।






__._,_.___

Posted by: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Re: {PFC-Friends} Mark Zuckerberg wants everyone to read 'The Muqaddimah' : which contradicts the Quran completely



The Mahabharata itself is an epic--the largest one ever written. The Gita is a part of it. There are many Puranas. 

Spirituality? Was Kali worshippers like Ramakrishna Paramhansadev less spiritual? Was Rhishi Aurobinda less spiritual? You can give many examples like this. Hindus worship have the provision for 'sakar (God with form)' and 'nirakar (God without any form)' worship. He can worship 'Chinmoy' inside 'mrinmoy'. So the question of head or tail is irrelevant here. 

There is a typo in my last message. The sun is a star, not a date. 

As per one version of mythology, Luxmi or Shree is also divine. 


Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 16, 2015, at 5:56 PM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Everything comes from either the Veda or the Puran or the Upanishad. I think, Mahavarat comes from the Veda or the Puran, and Gita comes from the Upanishad. So, I can't say for sure; you could be right. 
The main point is - all these Gods and Goddesses are just some imaginary characters in the mythology. The sooner people understand this point, the sooner they will be able to concentrate on the 'spirituality' embedded in those scriptures. Otherwise, they will keep chasing the tail, and go nowhere.

Jiten Roy

 

From: "Subimal Chakrabarty subimal@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Re: {PFC-Friends} Mark Zuckerberg wants everyone to read 'The Muqaddimah' : which contradicts the Quran completely

 
Does the Mahabharata really have these? I thought all these are mentioned in the Vedas and various Puranas. I will double check. 

The Jupiter and the Saturn are two planets of the sun---right? The sun itself is a date. 

The Indian mythologies have sages with the names of some of the planets. Brihaspati (Jupiter) and Venus (Shukracharyya) are the examples. Shani (Saturn) is a god. Rabi (the sun which is a star) is also a god. The Mercury (Budha) is the son of the moon which itself is not a planet; it is a satellite of the planet earth. The Indian mythologies have mountains and rivers as gods and goddesses. It is pretty complex and in many cases contradictory. 

Sent from my iPhone



On Jun 15, 2015, at 6:52 PM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
In Mahabharat, the epic Indian mythology, Gods represent kings of various planets, who used to visit earth from there. Goddesses (Ganga, Saraswati, Durga, Lakhmi, etc.), on the other hand, represent earthly objects. 
Brahmah, Bishnu and Shib are the Trinity in Mahabharat, similar to the Trinity of the Greek and the Biblical mythologies.
Jiten Roy 

 

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Re: {PFC-Friends} Mark Zuckerberg wants everyone to read 'The Muqaddimah' : which contradicts the Quran completely

 
I am a member of the Biblical Archaeological Library. In one of the recently published articles it showed how Sun God was central in their concept of monotheism. Defining a star as a mass of gas that releases more heat than it absorbs, the solar system has two more stars, viz., Jupiter and Saturn. Now compare with Greek and Indian mythology, you find a trinity of Gods. The inhabitants on earth might have witnessed them competing for supremacy in the heaven.

Sent from my iPad



On Jun 15, 2015, at 4:32 AM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
We don't know which other parts of the universe, except earth, the need for God is felt. We know for sure, God is much needed on earth, and existence of earth and its content depends on Mother Nature, which won't exist without sun; sun is the sole caretaker of the Mother Nature. So, sun is the prime candidate for God. Many parts of the world sun is already worshipped as God.
Ancient Egyptians used to worship Ra, the Sun God, Greeks worship Helios, Native Americans worship Sun, Persians (Mithraism) worship Sun. The legend of Mithra may well have given birth to the Christian resurrection story. Many South East Asian religions, treat Sun as God.
Sun is almighty and omnipresent on all of us, and it fits the description of God, we know. I don't think anybody, including scientists, would have any trouble accepting Sun as the God. What do you think?
Jiten Roy

 

  
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 10:16 PM, "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Religion is based on the idea of a geocentric universe. It is also inherently patriarchal. Mother Nature needs a father God to be functional. No atheist denies the existence of the universe. Since Akhenaten the idea of God was based on Sun. With its appearance on the horizon, all luminaries lost their glory in heaven. It was also related with fertility of the soil. Thus priesthood grew among people having rudimentary knowledge of science. A branch of them became mortuaries creating the concept of afterlife. Rulers found it useful. Deprived mass could be kept calm with the carrot of reward in heaven.

Great scientific discoveries often were serendipitous. Many inventors didn't even believe in what they invented. Max Planck, for example, survived about four decades after his invention of Quantum Mechanics. Not for a day, he believed in it. Brian Josephson ended up in research on ghosts. Newton succumbed to Arian heresy. Obviously, even great scientists were not quite open minded.

Assassins grow not out of innocent people. They grow out of ignorance, desire for rewards here and afterlife. Blake defined innocents as those having knowledge and ignorants as those lacking it.

Arab conquerors encouraged science and philosophy for a few centuries. But after the Baghdad massacre the tendency became opposite. Anyone in doubt may read Bernard Lewis and P. K. Hitti and other authors of Islamic history.

Sent from my iPad



On Jun 12, 2015, at 5:56 AM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
You are right – the ultimate determinant of truth will be the science. Religion, on the other hand, is a hypothesis that can never be verified, but, there is no dearth of people to have complete faith in it.
Human beings are normally critical of everything due to natural survival instincts, but – brainwashing can change all that. Correct brainwashing can destroy peoples' mental faculty for criticism, no matter how harmful the effect of it is. Thus, assassins are manufactured out of the most innocent people in the society.
Jiten Roy
 

From: "Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Re: {PFC-Friends} Mark Zuckerberg wants everyone to read 'The Muqaddimah' : which contradicts the Quran completely

 
Agree! How would an objective mind have two contradictory positions simultaneously? Science can't be polluted with the idea like... God has all the answers. It does not and it never had!   
 




On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 10:24 PM, "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Belief in science keeps the door open to criticism and review while belief in religion closes it. Nobody can be a believer in both.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 10, 2015, at 5:43 AM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

This shows you really did not understand my post. If I say – Man is stronger than woman, you will perhaps show me some women wrestlers to prove that not all men are stronger than women.

You said: "One can simultaneously be strong believers in both science and religion."

You cannot selectively believe in science. That's a total nonsense. When someone disbelief science because it contradicts religious belief, he/she is only pretending to believe in science.

Jiten Roy


 

From: "Subimal Chakrabarty








__._,_.___

Posted by: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___