Banner Advertiser

Sunday, May 10, 2015

[mukto-mona] দুর্নীতি দমন কমিশন-দুদক নিষ্ক্রিয় !




 দুর্নীতি দমন কমিশন-দুদক নিষ্ক্রিয় !
প্রতিষ্ঠার এক দশকেও প্রত্যাশা পূরণ করতে পারেনি দুর্নীতি দমন কমিশন-দুদক। দশ বছরে মামলা করেছে ৩ হাজার ৬৬২টি। কিন্তু এর একটিও আপিল বিভাগে প্রমাণিত হয়নি। চূড়ান্তভাবে দোষী সাব্যস্ত হয়ে কারাগারে নেই কোনো দুর্নীতিবাজ। একমাত্র বনখেকো ওসমান গনি দ-াদেশের বিরুদ্ধে আপিল না করে স্বেচ্ছায় কারাভোগ করছে।

মামলা দায়েরের পর তদন্তে আসামিদের অব্যাহতি দেয়ার প্রবণতাই বেশি দুদকের দশ বছরের কার্যক্রমে। চার্জশিট দাখিলের অনুপাতও কম। 
লক্ষণীয় বিষয় হচ্ছে, অভিযোগ থেকে অব্যাহতি পাওয়ার তালিকায় প্রভাবশালী আমলা ও রাজনীতিবিদের সংখ্যাই বেশি।
পর্যবেক্ষক মহল মনে করে যে, দুর্নীতিবিরোধী রাষ্ট্রীয় এ প্রতিষ্ঠান জন্মলগ্ন থেকেই আমলাদের করায়ত্তে। নানাভাবে এটিকে নিষ্ক্রিয় করে রাখা হয়। যখনই সক্রিয় হয়, তখন থেকেই এটি পরিণত হয়েছে সরকারের রাজনৈতিক হাতিয়ারে। আইনত স্বাধীন হলেও কার্যক্রমে সরকার ও দুদক ছিল একাট্টা। অতি সম্প্রতি দুদক পরিণত হয় দায়মুক্তি কমিশন-এ। পদ্মা সেতু দুর্নীতি মামলার সব আসামিকে অব্যাহতি, হলমার্ক কেলেঙ্কারিতে সরকার-ঘনিষ্ঠদের বিরুদ্ধে কার্যকর ব্যবস্থা গ্রহণ না করা, প্রভাবশালী মন্ত্রী-নেতা-আমলাদের অভিযোগ থেকে অব্যাহতি দেয়ার মধ্য দিয়ে তা প্রমাণিত হয়েছে।
অপরদিকে আদালত ও দুদকের সংশি¬ষ্ট সূত্রগুলো থেকে প্রাপ্ত তথ্যে জানা যায়, মামলা পরিচালনার জন্য দুদককে এখনো সরকারি প্রসিকিউশন ও এটর্নি জেনারেলের দফতরের মুখাপেক্ষী থাকার কারণে তারা বিচার প্রক্রিয়ায় সুবিধা ও ভালো ফল ঘরে তুলতে পারছে না। দুদকের মামলায় এখনো লেখা হচ্ছে 'আসামি বনাম রাষ্ট্র'। যেখানে হওয়া উচিত 'আসামি বনাম দুদক'। কারণ দুর্নীতি মামলার বিচারের দায়িত্ব রাষ্ট্রের নয়। দুদকের নিজস্ব প্রসিকিউশন ইউনিট নিরপেক্ষভাবে বিচার পরিচালনা করার কথা। কিন্তু দুদক আইনে সংশোধনী না আনার কারণে রাষ্ট্রের মুখাপেক্ষী থাকতে হচ্ছে দুদককে। সরকার ক্ষমতায় আসার আগে ও পরে বলেছিল দুদকের ক্ষমতা বাড়াবে। কিন্তু কার্যত তিন বছরে দুদককে শক্তিশালী করা বা দুর্নীতির বিচারে রাষ্ট্রপক্ষের নজরদারি বৃদ্ধিসহ সার্বিক সহায়তা করার কোনো নজির নেই। বরং অনেক ক্ষেত্রে রাষ্ট্রপক্ষের আইনজীবীরাই দুদকের মামলার বিচারে বাধা হয়ে দাঁড়িয়েছে। দুদকের যে ক'জন প্যানেল আইনজীবী আছে তাদের মধ্যে অনেকেই স্রোতের সাথে গা ভাসিয়ে দিচ্ছে। কেউ কেউ আন্তরিক হলেও দুদক থেকে প্রয়োজনীয় সহায়তা পায়নি বলেও অভিযোগ রয়েছে। এই বাস্তবতায় বর্তমান সরকারের আরো দুই বছর মেয়াদকালে দুদক আসলে কার্যকর কিছু করতে পারবে কিনা তা নিয়ে সন্দেহ রয়েছে। 
বলাবাহুল্য, প্রধানমন্ত্রী থেকে পিওন সবাই মানুষ। কেউ মানুষ তৈরিকারী- মহান আল্লাহ পাক তিনি নন। সাধারণ মানুষ মানুষের অন্তরের গতি-প্রকৃতি উপলব্ধি করতে পারে না। নিয়ন্ত্রণ করতে পারে না। তাই মানুষের তৈরি আইন কখনো মানুষ শৃঙ্খলিত করতে পারে না। এক মানুষের তৈরি আইনের ফাঁক-ফোকর অন্য মানুষ সহজেই ধরে ফেলতে পারে। আইনের প্যাঁচ গলিয়ে অথবা প্রভাব তৈরি করে সহজেই পার পেয়ে যেতে পারে। জাল কাগজপত্র দিয়ে হাইকোর্ট থেকে জামিন অথবা অনেক বিচারকের দুর্নীতিই এক্ষেত্রে পর্যাপ্ত উদাহরণ নয়। বরং কোন্টি উদাহরণ নয়- সে প্রশ্নও এখানে সঙ্গত। 
অপরদিকে মানুষের কথা মানুষের অন্তরে প্রভাব বিস্তার করতে পারে অতি-অল্পই। এক্ষেত্রে সম্পূর্ণ বিপরীত এবং অনিবার্য বিষয় হলো- মহান আল্লাহ পাক উনার সম্মানিত ওহী মুবারক। মহান আল্লাহ পাক উনার রসূল, নূরে মুজাসসাম, হাবীবুল্লাহ, সাইয়্যিদুল মুরসালীন, ইমামুল মুরসালীন হুযূর পাক ছল্লাল্লাহু আলাইহি ওয়া সাল্লাম উনার থেকে বর্ণিত পবিত্র হাদীছ শরীফ। অর্থাৎ পবিত্র কুরআন শরীফ ও পবিত্র সুন্নাহ শরীফ। 
যে কারণে দেখা যায়, যত গুনাহগার বা সাধারণ লোকই হন না কেন তিনিও যখন রোযা রাখেন, তখন প্রচ- গরমের দিনেও পুকুরে ডুব দিয়ে অথবা একাকী বাড়িতে থেকেও তিনি পানি পান করেন না অথবা খাদ্য খান না। এখানেই ওহীক বোধের সার্থকতা এবং অনবদ্যতা। তার বিপরীতে কোনো সাধারণ মানুষের জন্য মানুষকে হিদায়েত করার যোগ্যতা নেই। কারণ সাধারণ মানুষ নিজেই নিজের অজান্তে অনিয়ম করে থাকে। আর মহান আল্লাহ পাক তিনি ইরশাদ মুবারক করেন, "তোমরা ঐ কথা বল কেন- যা তোমরা নিজেরাই করো না।"
বলাবাহুল্য, আদেশ দেয়ার ক্ষমতা মহান আল্লাহ পাক উনার, আল্লাহ পাক উনার হাবীব নূরে মুজাসসাম, হাবীবুল্লাহ হুযূর পাক ছল্লাল্লাহু আলাইহি ওয়া সাল্লাম উনার

মহান আল্লাহ পাক তিনি ইরশাদ করেন, "তোমরা মহান আল্লাহ পাক উনার, উনার হাবীব নূরে মুজাসসাম, হাবীবুল্লাহ হুযূর পাক ছল্লাল্লাহু আলাইহি ওয়া সাল্লাম উনার এবং যারা উলীল আমর উনাদের হুকুম পালন করো।"
মূলত, এছাড়া যারা আদেশ দিবে, যারা মানুষের আইন প্রয়োগ করতে চাবে তারা যালিম, ফাসিক, কাফির। মহান আল্লাহ পাক তিনি ইরশাদ করেন, "যারা মহান আল্লাহ পাক উনার আদেশ ব্যতীত আইন প্রয়োগ করে তারা যালিম, ফাসিক ও কাফির।" 
বলাবাহুল্য, মহান আল্লাহ পাক উনার আইন প্রয়োগ না করলে শুধু যে যালিম, ফাসিক ও কাফির হবে তাই নয়; বরং প্রচলিত আইনের দ্বারা সমাজে কোনোদিনই শান্তি ও ইনসাফ আসবে না। সবচেয়ে বড় কথা- প্রচলিত আইনেরও শতভাগ প্রয়োগ বাস্তবে কেনোদিনই হবে না।


__._,_.___

Posted by: =?UTF-8?B?4Kau4Kak4Ka/4KaJ4KawIOCmsOCmueCmruCmvuCmqA==?= <journalist163@gmail.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Enjoy



I thought, it was about 'low caste' Hindus being brainwashed by some vested interests to keep them at the bottom. All religions are basically are in the business of brainwashing subscribers to believe certain things without evidence and logic. Islam is not any exception. The other day, a video was circulated about the most desirable women of the heaven. And, people were happy to reject the real living beauties of this world. Do I need to add more? I think, you know the answer.
 




On Sunday, May 10, 2015 3:05 PM, "Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Well, Mr. Deeldar, when I talked about brainwashing, it was not only about Hindu brainwashing. Brainwashing with Islam and Muslim brotherhood is the worst problem for Bangladesh.
Nurturing differently is not a problem as long as people understand what is right and what is wrong, and treat all people with dignity, human rights and citizenship rights. 
 



On Sunday, May 10, 2015 11:48 AM, "Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Disagreement is rather a good sign for the forum. Thank you.
I still think, brainwashing is not a problem for current Bangladesh when you can hardly find a brahmin in your neighborhood. Most East Bengal brahmins left for the West during and after the partition. So, if brainwashing is a problem, then, it must be for the state of West Bengal, where they have settled and have a good power base. As far as I know, West Bengalees are far more educated and enlightened than their Bangladeshi counterparts. I do not think the hardened Jogen Monadals of West Bengals are taking daily sermons from these 'high caste' brahmins as necessary guidance for their Hindu lifestyle.
As J. Roy mentioned, every caste foolishly think, they have some thing to be proud of their ancestry? We see some frictions now and then amongst the castes when it comes to the marriage and social interactions.. Lowest castes are not always the victims.

This is basically a tribal mentality that would not go away that easily. The problem existed a thousand years ago and it will be there in another thousand years from now......just in another form.

We might be genetically equal as a species, but we as individuals will always be nurtured differently by our parental/communal environment. If you call nurturing is a form of brainwashing.....I would agree with you. 
 




On Saturday, May 9, 2015 3:48 PM, "Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Well, Mr. Deeldar, most of the times I do not disagree with you; but this time I have to.
 
The brainwashing is done by centuries old religion/tradition that comes through family and community. Some states support it, some states are indifferent to it, and some states discourage it; but states are not the principal brainwashers anywhere.
 
I agree with you that the Hindu caste system is on the way out. But I disagree with you when you suggest that the so-called Negros (black people) are "dammed forever in a western class based system." The West and the rest of the world are improving faster on the problem of racism than on the problem of religion-based division/hatred. That is because religious brainwash is hard to give up. That is also in spite of the fact that religious nonsensical divisions are less natural than the differences between the colors (black, white, brown, etc.).
 
President Obama is not the only reason why I disagree with you. Look at the colors of political, bureaucratic (both governmental and corporate), and military leaderships in America. There are many black, brown (Indians) and yellowish (Chinese) people holding very important positions in America. The black people that were slaves less than two hundred years back are now competing quite fairly against white people in much of the Western world.
 
With a reasonably careful look, I am sure you would not have a problem seeing the difference between the divisions that have their origins in the stupidity of religions and that have their origins in Mother Nature making people look different.
 
Sukhamaya Bain
 
=====================
 
 



On Saturday, May 9, 2015 8:55 AM, "Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Not sure who is brainwashing whom? There is no state power that enforcing this 'brainwashing' that Subain invokes here. At this point, people are pretty clever to know what is right and what is phony. It is the money and power that keeps people at the bottom. If new Jogen Mondols take new Hindu high caste surnames, would anybody care to stop it? As far as I know, there is no genetic test that differentiates a low caste Hindu from a 'high caste' Hindu. I have seen enough fair skinned low caste Hindus, who are far fairer than many Banerjees and Chakrabartys. So, low caste thing is on the way out with people having access to money and power. Whereas, the same thing cant be said about an American or European negro. He/she is dammed forever in a western class based system. No money or education would wipe out the social prejudices that easily. Humans are very cruel animals....even with their own progeny.
 




On Friday, May 8, 2015 8:48 PM, "Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Indeed, the so-called low-caste Hindus and their representative, Jogen Mondal, made a wrong judgment in the 1940s. They did not have the foresight to see that India was pluralistic and was very likely to improve on that, whereas Pakistan had Islamic/Muslim fanaticism in its core and was likely to get worse. In spite of some sensational stories that come into light occasionally, the so-called low-caste Hindus are doing a lot better in India than in Bangladesh; and of course today's Pakistan is just too barbaric against non-Muslims.
 
As for class divisions and caste system, there is a big difference between having a caste system that is tied to religion and a free-market class system. In a free-market class system, a low class person is not brainwashed to accept the class as his/her destiny due to things like what sins he/she might have done in the last lives. A low class person of today can certainly become a high class person of tomorrow; and we see that happening all the time in many parts of the world. The same cannot be said about the caste system. So, it would be wrong to try to find an excuse for the Hindu caste system by pointing to the class divisions that we see everywhere, including in the USA.
 
SuBain
 
==================================


On Thursday, May 7, 2015 5:51 PM, "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Hindu societies from India to Indonesia had plenty of faults. These fell easily to Muslim invasion. So did even the Persians. They fell even more easily. In fact, the four major caste system was a Persian innovation. Modern day theologians don't consider it ineffective. The system decomposed when belonging to high caste became inheritance. 

Alliance among the Dalits and Muslims is a fact of politics in India even today. Jogen Mandal and his followers voted for Pakistan. He was assured a cabinet post in lieu of it. When Indian army marched into Hyderabad, the repercussion set into the form of riot in East Pakistan. Fearing arrest, Mandal left for Calcutta. The poor subaltern Hindus were uprooted due to their bad judgment. Along with blaming the Brahmins, the low caste should also blame themselves for the events. The downtrodden should overthrow the oppressor first and then choose a new destiny.

Sent from my iPad

On May 6, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
We, gentlemen, let me make some comments here.
 
The Hindu caste system has been no less harmful for the Indian subcontinent than the Hindu-Muslim divide. To compare the extra-religious and far less defined caste mentality among the Muslims with the Hindu caste system is preposterous. Here, I am in serious disagreement with Dr. Roy and Dr. Das. Look, even as recently as in 1947, much of the present day territory of Bangladesh fell into the insanity of Islamic fanaticism because a so-called low-caste Hindu community decided that their Muslim brothers would be better than the so-called high-caste Hindus.
 
Discrimination against women in Hindu religion/tradition has also been an egregious and indefensible offence.
 
I am also puzzled by Mr. Chakrabarty's notion that the preacher in the video was "spreading hatred against women." The preacher asked people to not look at women on Earth lustfully, because that would be a sin; and if they could avoid that sin, they would get the prize of having so many attractive, sexy and lustful young women in heaven. Here he surely did not preach anything like subjugating or harming women. He was just stupid, preaching a bunch of stupider people; and no honorable human being would associate himself/herself with thing kind of morons. We could add/emphasize that this kind of stupid people can be manipulated to do a lot of bad things for their belief, and they should be re-educated - hell with religion, if needed.
 
SuBain
 
=========================================
 



On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 7:43 PM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Exactly, Dr. Das, Islam has various castes, and so do all other religions also. I am not sure how someone, like Mr. Chakraborty, could equate caste-ism to religious communality.
His extra eagerness to expose my favoritism to Hinduism by pointing out my willful omission of Hinduism from the list of organized religions made him persistent on my response. I understood his intention, and ignored his first response. I knew - he did not know what an organized religion was. He insisted on my response again, and I had to reply.  
Jiten Roy

 

From: "Kamal Das kamalctgu@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Enjoy

 
Contrary to common belief, even Islam ain't free from caste system. Al Barani, a contemporary of Muhammad bin Tughlaq defended it. In his time, the number of castes in Islam was a little less than four hundred. Buddhism, Christianity, and Judaism also have it. An ignoramus can put as much mud on himself as he wants. Such an idiot should follow the steps of Suman Kabir.

Sent from my iPad



On May 5, 2015, at 5:57 AM, Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
"Dr. Jiten Roy compared casteism and discrimination against women in Hinduism as a mosquito bite while the same thing in other organized religions as tiger bites."
I always regret to reply to idiotic response, like this, because it's a misstatement of my comment.
The format of this forum does not allow me to qualify all comments with enough details that is required for some people to understand.
First, Hinduism is not an organized religion; in fact, it's the most disorganized religion on earth, which recognizes all religions, all interpretations (Mots), and all paths (ways).  
Second, caste-ism is not the religious communality, because - caste-ism occurs within the same religious boundary, and affects communities within the same religion only. On the contrary, religious communality occurs across the religious boundary, and affects all other religious communities.
In fact, caste-ism of Hinduism helped other organized religions (Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism, etc.) to spread and flourish in India, instead of affecting them negatively.
That why, I compared caste-ism of Hinduism to mosquito-bite, and religious communality with tiger-bite. Also, Mr. Chakraborty, this comment has nothing to do with discrimination of women in religion, which is a different topic altogether.
I think - your thoughts are messed up with too many issues.   
Jiten Roy

 

From: "Subimal Chakrabarty subimal@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Enjoy

 
I think both Bangladesh and india have some sort of blasphemy law. He can be prosecuted if the government wants to. Having said this I must say that I do not believe in blasphemy law. 

Moreover, spreading hatred against women in an open forum can be taken seriously by the women's rights groups and the feminists. I claim myself to be belonging to the latter group. So logically I am justified to seek justice. 

In a different but related thread Dr. Jiten Roy compared casteism and discrimination against women in Hinduism as a mosquito bite while the same thing in other organized religions as tiger bites. He did not elaborate on it. It was a single liner. 

Sent from my iPhone



On May 3, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Sukhamaya Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
If bringing to justice means punishment by a court of law or worse, Professor Chakrabarty's statement would be disappointing; as he is an otherwise rational intellectual. If the speaker committed the so-called blasphemy, even by intentional falsification (which is worse than misinterpretation) of Islam, the punishment for him should be from the proclaimed almighty, Allah, not from humans individually or collectively (society/government). The so-called Ulema and people in general could criticize/disown him, nothing more.
 
SuBain
 
=================================== 



On Sunday, May 3, 2015 1:37 PM, "subimal chakrabarty subimal@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
If Prof. Majid is right (I am sure she is), the speaker is committing 'blasphemy' by mentioning a Surah which does not exist in the Koran. He should be identified, caught, and brought to justice. The entire Ulema should also protest. 



On Sunday, May 3, 2015 10:31 AM, "Jiten Roy jnrsr53@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
 
The trouble is - not many people has the ability to interpret the religious scriptures, and they depend on these readily available sources for understanding the religious teachings, which should be a grave concern for the society, in my view.
Unfortunately, there is no accountability of any preacher, and anything can go in the name of religion. Some cunning people are taking advantage of this situation, and they have taken up the religious preaching, as a living, without knowing much about the religion, and they are passing political and personal interests as divine religious doctrines.  This should not be the case.
Since the society revolves around religion, Government must control these individuals through the Religious Affairs' Ministry. Otherwise, society will be polluted beyond repair. We need to remember, religious freedom only gives freedom to practice religion. Unfiltered religious propaganda is not a part of the religious freedom.  
Jiten Roy
    
 

From: "Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 1:28 AM
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Enjoy

 
He is LYING in the name of Allah! He has uttered gobbledygook - some Arabic sounding gibberish. It is certainly not any ayah from any Surah of the Qur'an that says what he says it says. There is no Bokhari, no Muslim Hadith that say what he says they say. His audience is fooled and bullied. He should be reported to the Police for purposefully distorting Holy Scriptures in order to incite social unrest.

I have forwarded the video to a member of the Law Commission asking for suggestions to curb such outrageous public bullying.






From: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 13:46:28 -0500
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Enjoy

 
Can we get reference? I understand it was in Dhaka, but who is the speaker? Does he belong to an Islamic political party? Has it been recorded by the speaker for public consumption or some one videoed it secretly and then put the same on YouTube? 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 2, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Sitangshu Guha guhasb@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



























__._,_.___

Posted by: Shah Deeldar <shahdeeldar@yahoo.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___