Banner Advertiser

Friday, November 4, 2011

[ALOCHONA] Re: Low and disorder....




http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/11/04/115842


http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/11/05/115982


http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/11/05/115989


http://www.thedailysangbad.com/?view=details&archiev=yes&arch_date=04-11-2011&type=gold&data=Loan&pub_no=883&menu_id=13&news_type_id=1&val=83074

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:
Narsingdi :  Chatra League set train on fire


Rab men stand beside the burning train after BCL men set fire to six bogies of the train during hartal Wednesday morning. Photo: STAR
http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/latest_news.php?nid=33376


http://banglanews24.com/news.php?nssl=66731

The supporters of slain Narsinghdi mayor Lokman Hossain have set fire to a Dhaka-Kishoreganj passenger train, as a general strike is in force to protest against the murder.

Narsigndi railway station master Maron Chandra Das told bdnews24.com that the angry protesters set six coaches of the Egaroshindur Express on fire on Wednesday.

He said the incident occurred at around 10.15am on Wednesday when the train reached Narsinghdi.

http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2011-11-02/news/198688
"Many passengers jumped off the train at that time and were injured. We are working to douse the flames," the master added.

"A patrol team of the Rapid Action Battalion-11 went to the spot after learning about the torching and was pelted with brickbats by angry protesters.

Meanwhile, Bangladesh Chhatra League, the student wing of ruling Awami League, has enforced a 72-hour general strike in Narsinghdi to protest against the murder.

Shops and business organisations were seen shut on Wednesday morning. Activists of ruling Awami League and associate organisation have taken out processions demanding arrest and punishment of the assailants.

http://sonarbangladesh.com/blog/faceboo/73309
The organisers, however, said the first day's protest would not be that tight as family and party colleagues were waiting for the Hossain's body to arrive for burial.

"It will be an eased protest until 6pm Wednesday to facilitate the burial," said S M Qayum, a former central committee member of the student wing.

Qayum added that the Namaaj-e-Janaza would be held after Asr prayers when his body is brought back from Dhaka, where it underwent an autopsy.

Additional police forces have been deployed in the area to control the situation. Deputy inspector general (DIG) of Dhaka range police M H Nuruzzaman, Rapid Action Battalion-11 additional DIG Mostofa Kamal have reached Narsinghdi overnight to keep close watch on the situation.

Superintendent of Narsinghdi police Akkas Uddin Bhuiyan said, "A large number of law enforcers from Narsinghdi and surrounding districts has been deployed to handle the situation."

Doctors of Dhaka Medical College Hospital (DMCH) declared the 43-year old Hossain dead nearly three hours after he was shot by a masked gunman in front of the Awami League office at the district headquarters' Sadar road at around 8pm on Tuesday.

Lokman, also the ruling party's town unit general secretary, was a two time Gold Medal winner as Best Mayor.

http://bdnews24.com/details.php?id=210492&cid=2


On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:



http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/11/02/115461


http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/11/02/115490



http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/11/02/115364
http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/11/02/115478
http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/11/02/115479



On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:




http://sonarbangladesh.com/blog/moynul7/70690


On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:
2941 murders in 9 months



http://dailynayadiganta.com/details/5737


On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:
Extortion, extortion....



http://www.jjdin.com/?view=details&type=single&pub_no=246&cat_id=1&menu_id=1&news_type_id=1&index=0



On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:

Extra-judicial Killings

Law-enforcers' story questioned

Terming law enforcers' accounts on extrajudicial killings as story, National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) Chairman Prof Mizanur Rahman yesterday questioned the credibility of their version.

"After crossfire incidents, we repeatedly hear same type of stories which create confusion among the people. It is not good for the society," the rights body chief told a meet the press programme.

Crime Reporters' Association of Bangladesh organised the event titled "Role of crime reporters to protect human rights" at Dhaka Reporters Unity, with its president Parvez Khan in the chair.

"Rab members are adequately trained. So why do people die from their gunshots and why the bullets don't hit their legs?" he posed the questions.

Law enforces often claim that they open fire in self-defence. Though it is legal, there is a specific definition of it. All the claims about self-defence are not legal, he mentioned. "Only the judiciary can decide which is legal or not. Let them take a decision on this."

Lawmen even try to legalise an extrajudicial killing citing one's previous criminal record, which is not legal either, added Mizanur.

Regarding persons going missing, the NHRC chief said right to life is the topmost basic right of the people. In a democratic country it is not acceptable that a person will go missing.

The state has to take the responsibility regardless of whether it finds them out or not. There is nothing to play hide and seek in this regard, he maintained.

Commissioner of Dhaka Metropolitan Police Benazir Ahmed pointed to lack of manpower in the judiciary for a huge backlog of cases. He suggested enhancing the capacity of the judiciary by 10 times to minimise the case backlog.

Additional Director General of Rapid Action Battalion (Rab) Col Majibur Rahman, Director of its legal and media wing Commander M Sohail and Chief Executive of Bangladesh Human Rights Foundation Alena Khan addressed the programme, among others.

http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=206733


On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:


http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/10/14/111688
http://jugantor.us/enews/issue/2011/10/14/news0326.htm
http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/10/14/111687
http://www.amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/10/15/111860
http://www.bd-pratidin.com/?view=details&type=gold&data=International&pub_no=528&cat_id=1&menu_id=1&news_type_id=1&index=10


http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/10/14/111695

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:

http://eprothomalo.com/contents/2011/2011_10_10/content_zoom/2011_10_10_1_11_b.jpg


On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:


http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/10/09/110640


On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:
Law, order better than any time in decade: Sahara


The home minister, Sahara Khatun, on Wednesday claimed that law and order now was better than any time in a decade.

Sahara said this at a press conference after a meeting of an inter-ministerial task force composed of home affairs, foreign affairs and law ministries on brining back home the convicted accused in the Mujib murder case hiding in other countries.

Asked about an increasing number of cases of disappearance and secret killing, she repeated her speech and said, 'According to reports of the mass media at home and abroad, Bangladesh's law and order is better than any time in 10 years.'

the law minister, Shafique Ahmed, said, 'How has the number of such incidents increased? Such incidents also took place in the past. We get to know of them as such incidents are now reported in the mass media.'

As for allegation of involvement of the law enforcement agencies in such disappearance and secret killing as an alternative to extrajudicial ways such as 'crossfire,' she said that there were law enforcement agencies, courts and the home ministry to look into such allegations. Aggrieved people could easily get justice by way of laws, she added.

As for bringing back home six fugitive convicts of the Mujib murder case, Shafique said that the government was making all-out efforts, including resorting to legal means, to bring back home Noor Chowdhury from Canada and Rashed Chowdhury from the United States.

He said that foreign and home affairs ministry were working to bring back the two convicts.Shafique, however, said that the government was yet to identify the whereabouts of the remaining four convicts as they were moving about. Of the 12 convicted, five were hanged to death, one died abroad and six others are in hiding.

Asked about the probable complications in bringing back home any condemned convicts from Canada as the law there does not allow execution, Shafique said that they could appeal to the Appellate Division, seek review of the High Court judgement and seek presidential clemency.

http://newagebd.com/newspaper1/frontpage/35819.html












__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Political killings on the rise



Political killings on the rise


More than 100 leaders and activists, mostly from AL and BNP, killed in 10 months

Kailash Sarkar

Incidents of political killing have taken an alarming rise in the country with death of over 100 leaders and activists of different parties in the last 10 months.

In most of the cases, popular local leaders with the prospect of obtaining nominations in the parliamentary elections have been killed by their rivals. On the other hand, the nation did not witness any of the alleged killers get punished, which according to many, has created a flattering ground for political murders.

While some of these killings took place during clashes between ruling Awami League and opposition BNP supporters, a significant share of incidents involves killing of one AL leader by another of the same party.

Sources said over 7,000 accused have been released under political consideration during the tenure of the present government while a number of accused awarded death sentence, including 22 convicts in two cases of Natore and Laxmipur, were pardoned.

Meanwhile, the law enforcers did not make any headway in almost all the cases related to political murder due to political interferences and blame games. In some cases, law enforcers resorted to arresting innocent people belonging to the opposite political camp.

For instance, truth of the murder of AL activist Ibrahim Ahmed on August 13 last year still remains in the dark due to the involvement of ruling party lawmaker Nurunnabi Chowdhury Shaon.

Political leaders killed in the recent times include Narsingdi Mayor Lokman Hossain, Khulna District unit publicity secretary of ruling Awami League and also chairman of Senhati union parishad in Digholia upazila Gazi Abdul Halim, Tangail Juba League leader Sadekur Rahman Dipu, Khulna BNP leaders Nasim Sheikh and Modasser Ali, Rangpur Juba League joint convener Sajid Parvez Jadu, AL leader of Mohammadpur Kamruzzaman Mithu, Jessore Monirampur upazila unit AL agriculture secretary Abu Abdullah, Haridas Kathi UP Chairman Prakash Chandra, Tejgaon unit joint convener of Bangladesh Chhatra League Mizanur Rahman, Jhenidah BNP leader Shahjahan Seraj, general secretary of DCC ward-39 unit BNP Kazi Abdur Rahman, and general secretary of Awami League ward-41 unit of the capital's Agargaon Fazlul Huq.

According to human rights body Odhikar, 95 people were killed and 8,882 others from AL, BNP and other parties were injured in political violence from January to September this year. At least seven persons were killed in last October.
Another human rights body Ain O Shalish Kendra in its report expressed concern over the rise in political violence.

Former Inspector General of Police (IGP) SM Shahjahan, also a former advisor to the caretaker government, cited various reasons for the rise in political killing incidents and termed the country a 'fertile ground' for political murders.

"No trial of earlier incidents and no punishment to the killers, political parties' blame games and political interference in investigation as well as in prosecution are the main causes," SM Shahjahan said, adding, "Apart from the impunity to the criminals, the clemencies also encourage killings of political leaders."

He criticised political leaders for their indifference to such killings and encouraging these through blame games.The former IGP, however, said the murders of political leaders did not happen for political reasons, but in most cases over establishing supremacy for extortion, land grabbing, business factors etc.However, he was doubtful about the rise in the number of political killing.

http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=209283



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Inconvenient Truths about Bangladeshi Politics



Inconvenient Truths about Bangladeshi Politics

The country may be heading backwards towards confrontational politics yet again, warns ALI RIAZ



Bangladeshi politics is on a confrontational course, once again. The statement by the Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina at a news conference in New York on September 25, 2011 dismissing any possibility of future negotiations with the opposition -- calling them "thieves and cheats", and a response from the leader of the opposition Khaleda Zia within 48 hours at a public gathering in Dhaka that "all doors are [now] shut for peaceful transfer of power" finally made it

official. It is not that there was ever a doubt that these two leaders would again lock horns, but such definitive statements from both parties underscored the return to conflictual politics. In the past year the question was often posed whether the country would be "back to square one"; in recent months media pundits have concluded that it is indeed "back to square one" and the question now being faced is how far the country is likely to regress?

A solution without solving the problem
The high hopes of establishing a transparent and accountable democratic system of governance after the popular uprising in 1990 faded in less than two years and agitational politics returned by late 1995 leading to a chaotic political situation in 1996. The uprising of 1990 was not made in a day but was a result of many deaths and untold sufferings over almost seven years. Similarly, the 1995-96 episode cost lives and caused misery to many. Once again, the ordinary citizens, who suffered most in these disruptions, and the analysts expected that politicians would have learned their lessons and chart a new course. The country muddled through the following decade; but only muddled through, and there were very few things in the political arena to be optimistic about.

Only a few dissenting voices asked what prompted the crisis and what guarantees that it would not return. The underlying causes of the crisis were never dealt with. In the absence of soul-searching and a robust debate two schools of thought emerged. "The problem has been solved" school adopted a very complacent tone; it was all about holding fair elections, and the constitutional provision -- the non-partisan caretaker government -- had ensured fair elections for eternity and therefore all would be well henceforth. The other school's approach was almost Harry Potteresque -- "he who cannot be named" can do no harm if you do not say the name. Thus avoid the "inconvenient truth" and all will be well. Both approaches led the nation down a blind alley. The crisis reappeared in 2006, or one can say the inevitable happened in the sense that as no one tried to change the course of the downward spiral, the nation reached rock bottom. But a political crisis is not a natural disaster that can appear at very short notice. If and when it is described as whirlwind, this is to describe its degree not its genealogy. Such a narrative makes the crisis comprehensible. Even for natural calamities, there are ways to prepare and most communities have some kind of contingency measures in place.

The misplaced optimism and a warning
Interestingly, in the summer of 2006, well before in the dramatic events that would be unleashed in October, some levelheaded people did anticipate a crisis of some kind. But they were assured by pundits and most political operatives that there were no reasons to be pessimistic. Private conversations with political leaders in December 2005 and January 2006, during a trip to Dhaka, gave me the impression that a brinkmanship attitude had taken hold among leaders and that possible options were becoming increasingly limited. In February 2006 my impression was reinforced after I met a group of Bangladeshi civil society activists, lawyers, journalists and policymakers at a meeting. When I returned to Dhaka in summer 2006, pundits and politicians advised me not to worry; I, however, remained unconvinced. I penned a commentary, entitled "The Crippled Caretaker" (Himal Southasia, August 2006) where I described the mood: "Some analysts dismiss the concerns, saying that political crisis is nothing new in Bangladesh, and that in the end a solution is always found. Such a fatalist attitude is based on viewing the present situation as reminiscent of previous 'crises' -- the last days of the military regime of General Hussain Mohammed Ershad in 1990, or the political crisis during the Khaleda Zia regime of November 1995-March 1996, both of which were resolved peacefully. On the surface, the argument is simple and forceful: however difficult it may appear, or however self-centred the political leadership may be, the Bangladeshi elites have a stake in the current system and will find a way to keep it running." The then ruling coalition -- the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and the Jaamat-i-Islami (JI), and the opposition parties led by the Awami League faced each other, waiting for the other to blink. The rational argument was that one party would blink, especially with the stakes being so high; or alternatively, both would agree that it was a no-win situation. This optimism did not come to pass, neither party blinked.

By August 2006 it was evident to many, as I summarised: "there are serious doubts as to whether the exercise [election] will be held on time -- and if so, whether it can be fair, and with participation by all political parties" -- a fair and timely election [i.e, January 2007] was almost impossible at that time. The shadow of the military began to loom large. In a humble way I tried to draw attention to an untoward situation: "Missing in this perspective is the presence of forces -- international, regional and domestic -- with agendas detrimental to the national interests of Bangladesh. It does not take an alarmist to underscore the possibility that, with the overall governance in disrepair and a badly organised general election, the country may be dragged into a situation that could demonstrate the weaknesses of multi-party representative democracy. The inability of leading political forces to resolve the crisis would then benefit a small but lethal force." Unfortunately, the events of January 2007 leading to two years of military-backed non-partisan technocratic regime bear out my prediction.

The reason for reprising this five year old commentary is simply to make a few points, which are not new at all, but worth recalling: that there are always telltale signs of a political crisis and its consequences, that a political crisis does not have one single trajectory -- it can be steered in a different direction if the political actors are willing to but sans serious efforts it will reach a destination whether one likes it or not; and that avoiding an 'inconvenient truth' does not make it go away -- 'he who cannot be named' does harm even if you don't name him. As the country is heading for another round of the same old crisis, signs of brinkmanship, of intransigent attitudes of all parties concerned, and of utter disregard for the misery of the people is now becoming obvious. It is therefore pertinent to examine what trajectory it might take and how it can be avoided.

The current imbroglio
The statements of the two leaders of the country, who have ruled alternately for the past two decades, suffice as indications of the impending impasse. But the situation has been brewing for quite some time, perhaps from the day after the election. The BNP never accepted the election results of 2008 at heart -- it never attempted to understand the causes of the worst possible showing ever for the party let alone admit that it was their wrong doing that made the nation suffer. The JI correctly understood that the popular mandate to the AL was at least partially based on the promise that the AL would try the war criminals of 1971 if voted to power; but the JI did not want to admit the fault and accept the consequences. The AL, on the other hand, misjudged the results as a "license to rule" instead of a "mandate to govern". In fact, politicians of all shades have failed to differentiate between these two since the independence of the country. Misgovernance followed -- proof of the ruling party's arrogance and total disregard for the rule of the law can be found via a quick perusal of any Bangladeshi newspaper. The reader will find evidence of the blanket impunity accorded to party activists, the condoning of mob justice, extrajudicial killings and mysterious disappearance of citizens. The furious reactions of the ruling party leaders including the Prime Minister to any dissent -- inside or outside the parliament, small or big, even on legitimate issues -- sends a chilling message

Parliament: Nobody's there?
The parliament has become one of the most dysfunctional institutions of the country. A report by a parliamentary watchdog published in June 2011 noted that the percentage of boycott of sessions was 34 in the fifth parliament (19911996), 43 in the seventh parliament (19962001), 60 in the eighth parliament (20012006) and 74 in the first two years of the existing ninth parliament. In all instances, the opposition evidently feels that it is not accountable to anybody and does not owe anyone an explanation for being absent. Ruling party members have the same mindset. Otherwise how can one explain the frequent quorum crisis that delayed the sittings when the ruling party alone has two-thirds majority and the ruling coalition has three-fourths of parliament members? On an average, each sitting was delayed by 39 minutes according to the report of the watchdog. In six sessions of the ninth parliament, Tk 19 crore was wasted just in waiting for the lawmakers to turn up.

Constitution after the amendment
The 15th Amendment of the Constitution, passed by the parliament in June 2011, has provided the opposition with a legitimate excuse. The amendment, among other things, eliminated the proviso for the caretaker government (CTG) from the constitution. Indeed a lame excuse is used by the government -- the highest court declared it "unconstitutional". But the fact remains that the complete verdict of the court is still pending and that the court ruling had also observed that the next two elections may be held under the CTG. These changes are made in the parliament in the absence of the opposition. Opposition was not interested in participating in the process of the amendment arguing that it is futile because the decision about the changes had already been made. It was true. But opposition did not participate perhaps because it was difficult to argue for a case which it previously opposed and insisted unconstitutional. The amendment has other disturbing aspects; importantly, insertion of a clause that makes any criticism of the constitution an offence punishable "with the highest punishment", and 55 clauses are now deemed "basic provisions" which are not amendable. Interestingly the opposition has made no objection to these severe amendments. The post 15th amendment Bangladesh constitution has become a mishmash of contradictory statements in regard to the role of religion -- on the one hand, Islam is the state religion (a provision that is now non-amendable in future) while on the other hand, the constitution asserts that the state will not grant political status in favour of any religion, Juxtaposed with the basic principles which include secularism, one gets a picture of the constitution's internal contradictions.

An election: To be or not to be?
The opposition leader has declared that her party and allies will allow no general election without the caretaker government system reinstated. She stated unequivocally that, "A caretaker government and a neutral election commission are a must for acceptable polls. In the absence of those, we won't take part in the election." The choice of words of Khaleda Zia is reminiscent of 1996 when the BNP tried to get away with a fraudulent one-party election under a partisan election commission. The BNP failed, thanks to the AL; but in the eyes of the BNP it is time to pay back the AL in its own coin. Both parties seem to have learned the wrong lessons from the 1996 February election episode -- a blemish on the electoral history of the nation since 1991. For the Awami League the lesson is how to create a facade of participation of opposition, while for the BNP it is a matter of vengeance. The air in Dhaka is thick with rumour that if the BNP does not join the next election, the Jatiya Party led by former dictator General Ershad, currently a coalition partner, will contest alone. Ershad has sent similar signals. Some of the AL leaders are happy that a loyal opposition is ready to provide legitimacy to the election.

It is also worth noting that Khaleda Zia's conditions for the BNP's participation in the next election include "a neutral election commission" (EC). The present members of the EC were appointed by the caretaker government in early 2007 after forcing out the most controversial members of the EC appointed by the BNP regime. Save some faux pas during the caretaker government (2007-8), the EC has done a reasonably well job thus far. The terms of all the three members will end by April 2012. Will the AL follow the BNP in appointing partisans as EC members? Judging by the actions of the AL during the past two and a half years, there is no reason to think otherwise. While removing the caretaker provision from the constitution the ruling party leaders including the PM said that the EC will be strengthened. No such steps have been taken. All of the requests from the EC to provide more resources and autonomy have fallen on deaf ears. The constitution stipulates that the EC members be appointed by the President under rules set by the parliament. The rules for appointment have never been formulated; thus the President can appoint anyone he chooses. The PM has indicated that the government is ready to reconstitute the EC through dialogues, but only time will tell whether that is a sincere offer.

Return of a ritual
As the election commission issue came to fore and the threat of the BNP to boycott the election began to loom large, a ritual of Bangladeshi politics has also returned: calling the two leaders to discuss, make compromises and build consensus. Members of the civil society, the business community and a segment of political activists have been chanting this mantra for two decades to no avail. Hoping that persistence will pay off, they are saying it again. The media, particularly those with no partisan affiliation feel it is their moral responsibility to underscore the need and reiterate the call. But they too perhaps know it is wishful thinking. The zero-sum game subscribed to by the two major parties and their supreme leaders Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia does not provide them with any room to meet in good faith, let alone compromise on any issue. The call based on a moral ground or democratic principles has had no effect for these leaders since 1991, why should they behave differently now? Many people have been arguing over the past 30 months that the experience of the caretaker regime between 2007 and 2008 -- the humiliation and incarceration, whether lawfully or not -- should make them think twice. This line of argument presupposes that the right lessons have been learned.

Lessons learned!
Undoubtedly, the parties have learned something. The PM in oblique reference to the two years' of the CTG repeatedly insists that extra-constitutional government will not be tolerated in future and the 15th amendment is designed to prevent it. The BNP, on the other hand, is still in denial mood -- 'the CTG conspired to defeat the BNP' is the dominant frame of mind. How the crisis emerged in 2006 was never an issue that featured in party discussions. Questions such as how and why corruption engulfed Khaleda Zia's government and the family, and why the line between clandestine organisations and the state blurred creating a serious threat to the nation's security are not something the BNP leadership want to discuss. Lack of such retrospection in the BNP provides the government with the opportunity to contend that the BNP's opposition to the government is merely a ploy to save the corrupt (including Khaleda Zia's two sons), and stop the war crimes trials in their tracks. These allegations are politically motivated, but not entirely unfounded.

The war crimes tribunal
The establishment of the War Crimes Tribunal in March 2010, an electoral commitment of the AL, has put the Bangladesh Jamaat-i-Islami on the back foot. After all, of seven politicians indicted thus far, five are JI leaders. Besides, the JI knows too well that the government has enormous popular support on this issue and the JI cannot mobilise to stop the trial. To do so, it must use other issues to derail the process. Revival of the 4-party alliance after almost two years and Khaleda Zia's description of the trial as "a mockery" in September was the best thing to happen to the JI since the election. The decision of the BNP to maintain its distance with the JI in the past year and to remain ambiguous on the war crimes tribunal were prudent moves, but now it has once again embraced the JI and all its problems. This decision will cost the BNP dearly as its acceptability to a segment of people will decline. But it will cost the nation more if the government fails to try the accused individuals in a manner that meets international standards and is acceptable to the international community. To date, there are concerns within the international community whether a credible and fair tribunal can take place under the present rules of procedure and the political climate. The failure to try the war criminals will have a long-lasting impact as will a show trial. The onus is on the government, but the government's performance to date is not satisfactory.

Quo vadis?
With this survey of the political landscape in front of us, we are faced with the question what is the trajectory of Bangladeshi politics? In the short term the nation does not have an appetite for street agitation and chaos, but neither does it have the patience to bear with the malgovernance for too long.

Five years ago, in the context of the brewing crisis, I was of the opinion that international, regional and domestic forces with agendas detrimental to the national interests of Bangladesh may come into play. It is equally true today and for any major crisis situation for the foreseeable future. In 2006 the international community tried to help Bangladesh avert the crisis; afterward it has taken flak for its initiative. Whether the involvement of foreign diplomatic missions in local politics was a violation of diplomatic norms is an open question. But it appears to me that there will be very little interest in taking initiatives of a similar kind if the nation plunges into another crisis. The experience, of course, is a factor. But more so because of the global situation; unless dramatic changes take place in the hot spots and in the global economy, the global players will remain busy elsewhere. Bangladesh may not feature very high on their list of priorities.

One must also pose the question, with a sense of resignation, how long will the nation remain hostage to these two parties and their obdurate leadership? The question has been asked for quite some time with no answers forthcoming. Some are clinging to the hope that these parties and their leaders will realise the popular aspirations and act on them. We all know, save divine or happenstance intervention, that this is unlikely. As such, the nation should brace itself for another round of confrontation -- the backward journey has now gained momentum, it will be a race from here. But where will it take the country -- 2006, 1996 or further behind? Let us ask the leaders, have they calculated how far behind they want to take the country?

Ali Riaz is Professor and Chair, Politics and Government, Illinois State University.

http://www.thedailystar.net/forum/2011/November/truth.htm



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Noor e Alam Siddiqui on Motia Chowdhury



Noor e Alam Siddiqui on Motia Chowdhury



http://www.thedailystar.net/2004/02/29/d4022901033.htm

http://articles.sfgate.com/2001-12-31/news/17629584_1_press-photo-busch-gardens-tampa-bay-david-guttenfelder


http://www.parisvisionnews.com/2011-07-14-13-36-49/69-political-news/1132-2011-11-03-00-22-49.html



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___