Banner Advertiser

Saturday, September 4, 2010

[ALOCHONA] ProthomAlo editor Motiur Rahman's minus 2 formula



ProthomAlo editor Motiur Rahman's minus 2 formula
 
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] The disappearing DCC Councillor candidates



The disappearing DCC Councillor candidates
 
 
 
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Ershad on Awami politrics



Ershad on Awami politrics
 
 
 
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Sharif's dream



 

Aasha Mehreen Amin

It is that time of the year when maintaining a low profile is essential. Our man Sharif, a thirty-something, unimpressive, middle class man now working at an obscure firm with vague, insignificant duties, is desperately trying to avoid that dreaded subject – Eid Shopping. Although his bonus has reached his account a long time ago, he has spent most of it paying for the loan he took for last year's Eid shopping when his darling daughter blackmailed him into buying a Mashakkali (Delhi 6) churidar suit. Now his wife Ata Begum is hounding him to go and finish buying gifts for the various members of the immediate and extended family, the domestic staff and their families, both their office colleagues and so on. His head starts to spin and his stomach has that familiar sinking feeling at the prospect of facing his beloved Ata and telling her that there is not much left of his bonus. Ata, dear Ata, sweet, chubby yet pretty Ata, Lord knows why she had to get so worked up over such little things as money. He could just see her working herself into a frenzy that would end up in days of the silent, glaring treatment followed by incessant crying followed by more humiliating borrowing from wealthier friends who would gloat over the fact that he was too hard up to do Eid shopping…

Sharif feigns a severe headache and rushes to the room to take a nap before iftar, a rare indulgence that Ata allows in the holy month. There is no electricity, hence no fan, yet despite the enervating heat and sound of incessant honking and tinkling of rickshaws outside his window from the three hour gridlock, Sharif in a bid to escape, falls into deep sleep.

Sharif is falling, down, down, down, through a nasty tunnel that gives off an assorted array of smells. Is it a clogged sewer, rotting garbage on the street or burnt oil after cooking the 100th piaju? Everything is rolled into one and Sharif is about to regurgitate his sehri when the black hole ends and he tumbles into The Garden of Possibilities. It is a lovely Krishnachura tree that welcomes Sharif into what seems to be the entrance to a party.

Beyond the enchanted garden fragrant with Hasna Hena and Gondhoraj flowers is an elegant hall decorated with fairy lights, balloons and colourful buntings that announce 'Eid Reunion for the Delusional'. The hall is brimming with richly dressed guests and Sharif recognises quite a few famous faces. Sharif's jaw drops to his chest as he spots two of the nation's Most Influential Women in the middle of the auditorium. Queen Shaksina and Queen Dolly Bee, two monarchs who take turns ruling the Kingdom of the Clueless and Naïve. They are known for their bitter hatred of each other that is evident from the venom that comes out every time they even think of each other. The tirades, if translated into physical battles would have led to severe injuries including fists full of hair being torn out of each opponent's head. Now here they are laughing and joking together like high school buddies. The two finely-dressed ladies do not seem to notice Sharif gawking at them in sheer amazement as he walks closer, hypnotised like a somnambulist, to them to hear their conversation.

Shaksina: Is he looking this way, please please see Dolly. No? Thank Goodness. I just can't take another 'I'm so sorry, past is past' refrain anymore.

Dolly Bee: I know, but what can he do? He knows he has no more rabbits in his hat after the seventh amendment fiasco. Don't you remember how he was when we brought him down in '89? He kept calling us on the phone saying he was 'soo sorry'. Pathetic!

Shaksina: I know, good times, eh? Life was so simple. We were on the same side, fighting with the people for the people. Even your hairstyle was simpler, I guess without the bee in your bonnet.

Dolly Bee: Careful, sister, don't get me started. Just because you get to be queen this round doesn't change anything. Your government has failed in pretty much everything – maintaining law and order, getting enough power and gas and water to the people; you have unlawfully withdrawn cases of your errant knaves – what was that with Sean and Fiqbal getting off the hook after killing four people during a royal procession in my reign? And your above-40 youth squad Crazy Legions – they are just like rabid dogs, tearing everything apart and admit it, you have no control over them, do you?

Shaksina (mustering all her strength to quell the venom in her mouth: Ha ha PLEASE. Don't talk about the power and gas crisis. We inherited all of that from you. We are actually trying to do something about it. And who created this idea of having armed youth squads in universities, it was your king remember, it was he who started messing with our Divine Constitution, making his illegal takeover legal, pardoning the traitors of the state, the sorcerers who cast evil spells on the people. They were given special brooms by your king to fly off to unknown lands to hypnotise more people in believing their fascist ideology.

See now my courts are setting the record right. By the time they finish, your king's reign and that impostor's reign will be declared unlawful. As for your friends from the Treachery Bench who exploit faith for political gain, who have killed and raped during the noble war, they too will be punished and expelled from the scene. You better start packing your bags Dolly, especially with your offsprings in so much trouble... Oh and by the way one of your Dukes has been arrested for trying to blow me up.

Dolly Bee: How dare you, just wait till we mobilise the subjects of this country against your oppressive reign, we will call hartals and movements in the entire kingdom.

Shaksina: Pah! You mean like the last hartal that ran out of steam? That should work...(derisive laughter)

Dolly Bee: It was hot and my men are aging, some of them are diabetic. I have decided to use the younger ones now.

Shaksina: Dream on sister. You just want to blame me for everything. How was your reign any different? You would blame me for a bad hair day!

As the royal bickering threatens to mar the rare moment of amity between the two, a strange figure approaches. Wearing his characteristic Armani suit and Versace cravat to hide the wrinkled neck is H.M. Borbaad, the alleged impostor who had usurped the throne with military forces, changed the constitution according to his needs and then proceeded to rule the kingdom, indiscriminately putting people in dungeons, extorting huge amounts of money from his subjects for every trade and monetary transaction possible and becoming a fulltime Casanova as well. (Note: All this the democratic monarchs have been accused of, the only difference being that they didn't use any illegal force but exploited the undying faith of their subjects who voted them to power). At this venue he is his usual charming self, smiling away and ingratiating himself to the two most powerful women in the country. But he keeps fading out, almost disappearing like an indecisive genie, for the evidence at the Royal Court of the Supreme Elders is indicating that he should not have existed at all in all those nine years. But of course, tenacious and unashamed as he is, he is a survivor and will try to win over the Queen whichever one is in power, at any cost.

HM Borbaad: Good evening oh Exalted Ones, it is such an honour to see you. Might I say how fetching you both look, eh, in a sisterly sort of way – Queen Shaksina in your deshi silk- what a patriot you are, and Queen Bee in your French haute couture. What amazing examples of womanhood. Oh I just heard, dear Queen Shaksina, you have been nominated 6th among the world's top ten women leaders by Time magazine and that too after the announcement that your kingdom, I mean our kingdom, has been ranked 88 in the World's List of Great Kingdoms. What an honour, what a great achievement!

Dolly Bee: Hmph! I was on the cover of Time once, for my exemplary role in fighting religious terrorism.

Shaksina: Oh yes, the time when you created those religious terrorists then pretended they didn't exist and then proceeded to capture them. Yeah, good job, sister. Borbaad, don't you have anyone else to bother, go write some poetry or something.

HM Borbaad: Heh heh, always pulling my leg my dear sister. I just wanted to say...

Shaksina: Please no, don't say it...
HM Borbaad: 'I'm so sorry, so very sorry. But you know, past is past, let us forget what has happened and move on, together we can make this kingdom truly great...

Sharif (remember this is his dream) is distracted by the sound of sweet melodies coming from another side of the hall. Naheed the Enlightened One is reciting poetry on the glory of universal learning that will free the kingdom from the darkness of Ignorance and Despair. In the background is Dr Sweet Moni serenely playing the tanpura as she dreams of better alliances with foreign kingdoms. As Naheed the Enlightened One ends his recitation to thunderous applause from a thousand uniformed cherubs, in comes another group. This time it is a rock band with Hero Fiqbal playing lead guitar with Sahara the Warrior Princess on the drums and Betel Chewer Delu on percussion and sound effects with his mouth. Good Man Q, Borbaad's better brother, is on vocals. He starts with a soulful rendition of 'Baeman, Baeman' (a bit like Rod Stuart's Roxanne) and then 'Tea with Sahara' an adapted version of a Sting (former Police guy) song. Sahara cannot help but blush with pleasure at this unexpected tribute and breaks into a rap extolling the successes of her ministry in capturing terrorists and enemies of the state and denying the bad deeds of members of The Young Royal Pain in the Neck otherwise known as Crazy Legion. There are, in fact, many members of the Crazy Legion all over the place playing 'Hall Capture', 'Kill Bill' and 'Varsity Admissions'. They show their appreciation of the rock concert by throwing their machetes in the air and firing a few blank rounds, fully synchronised. It almost sounds like fireworks from hell, muses Sharif.

Sharif's attention is drawn back to the monarchs who have been joined by others – M Maalsberg, Chief Treasurer and the legendary Fire Daughter who is now in control of the Royal Granaries. Betel Chewer Delu and Sahara Warrior Princess soon join them. They are discussing some survey done by a reputable establishment assessing the popularity of the current reign of Queen Shaksina.

Betel Chewer Delu (after swallowing a mouthful of betel mash): See your majesty (to Queen Dolly) I told you that they would sink into ignonimy. Look, it hasn't even been two years and people are already losing their faith in Queen Shaksina's reign. The polls are saying 19 percent of people are unhappy with the economy.

M Maalsberg (smiling his enigmatic, coy smile): Polls shmolls. Rubbish! I can say for a fact the economy is doing fine, despite the upheavals with the cloth workers, inflationary pressures and energy crisis. Our clothing industry is still doing well, people are buying like mad – we almost had stampedes at the shopping centres just before Eid. I think we are doing quite all right. Even Newsweek thinks so.

Fire Daughter: And we have enough food to feed our subjects, how about that?

BC Delu: But the polls also say that 31 percent of the people think the Crazy Legions are out of control and engaged in violence, crime such as killings, control of halls, extortion etc. And 43 percent believe corruption has increased and the Anti Corruption Commission is controlled by the government and has lost its neutrality.

Sahara Warrior Princess: The Crazy Legions are not involved in any crime. It is just propaganda, an attempt by dark forces to tarnish the image of the Shaksina Clan.

Shaksina: I have sternly warned my boys that no one will be spared even if they belong to the Clan, if they are engaged in unlawful acts.

BC Delu: But what about the corruption...
Dolly Bee: What about the spiteful lawsuits against my nobles, knaves and innocent sons, what about the power crisis, your constant selling the kingdom to the neighbouring land, the oppression of the people...

Shaksina: Please please, ladies and gentlemen, this is an Eid Reunion, not the battlefield of Karbala. Why don't we discuss this later in our most exalted of courts – The Royal Assembly?

Dolly Bee: The air-conditioning is faulty and the smell from the toilets...ugh.
BC Delu: They don't provide good betel leaves.

Shaksina: Just minor obstacles. We can fix all that. Just come and we will discuss all this civilly. Dolly let us now eat some sweets in celebration of this wonderful occasion where the sun has risen on the other side of the planet.

The two queens feed each other sweets, not of course before their personal Food Tasters have given the go ahead after gobbling a few and waiting for three minutes for any possible poisoning to set in.

Overcome with optimism and joy, Sharif is about to introduce himself and help himself to those sumptuous sweets when a screeching sound shatters his delicate eardrums. "Shareeeef, WAKE UP and have iftar quickly, we have tons of shopping to do, the roads will be clear right after iftar...SHAREEF DO YOU NOT HEAR ME?!"
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] US importers, lawmakers resent apparel worker repression




 
A group of US apparel and footwear importers and some US lawmakers have resented the repression on garment workers in Bangladesh who are rallying for a further wage increase.
   The American Apparel and Footwear Importers Association asked the Bangladesh government to ensure treatment of workers with compassion.
   Some US congressmen also suggested major garment importers should exert their influence on the Bangladesh authorities so that workers are treated fairly.
   New Age obtained a copy of a letter of the US importers' association addressed to Bangladesh's ambassador, seeking a settlement of disputes through peaceful negotiations.
   The letter, signed by Kevin M. Burke, the AAFA president and chief executive officer, expressed concerns about the recent events in Bangladesh, as reported in the media, about police and government repression on workers in various apparel factories.
   'The reports stem from ongoing protests by some workers against the proposed wage increase the government announced on July 29th. This repression has reportedly included arrests, intimidation, harassment and other measures that cause serious apprehension among AAFA members, many of whom are major buyers and producers of garments from Bangladesh,' the letter reads.
   The AAFA president warned the Bangladesh authorities that their member companies want to ensure that the apparel and footwear they import were manufactured under lawful, humane and ethical conditions.
   'We [AAFA members] hope the [Bangladesh] government will respect the rule of law and follow a peaceful approach in responding to these ongoing protests. More importantly, we urge the government to constructively engage all stakeholders — workers, producers and buyers — in order to resolve the RMG wage issue as soon as possible,' the association said.
   Citing cancellation of registrations of some Bangladeshi labour rights groups, including the Bangladesh Centre for Workers Solidarity, and detention of garment worker leaders, the association said such actions would be unacceptable to the US importers.
   The association, which has representation of hundreds of US retailers and importers, exert much influence on the US government and the congress.
   Some US congressmen, meanwhile, sent a letter to some major US importers asking them to exert their influence on the Bangladesh government to refrain form repressing apparel workers whose protest was legitimate.
   'The Bangladesh government responds to the unrest [protests] with hard rhetoric, calling labour leaders "provocateurs" and "saboteurs." In addition, many arrests were made and charges were filed against workers who participated in protests,' the congressmen said in the letter sent to the chief executive officers of major US importing houses.
   The letter signed by 19 US congress members was sent to the chief executive officers of Wal-Mart, JC Penney, H&M, Cintas Corporation, K-Mart and VF Corporation.
   'We wish to bring the severity of the situation to your attention and urge your company to use influence as a major importer of clothing produced in Bangladesh to bring about a just peaceful solution to the situation,' the letter said.
   'It is crucial that the Bangladesh government understands that major American retailers will not be able to maintain the current level of business with Bangladesh unless the charges [against workers] are dropped and prosecution of labour leaders stop immediately,' the letter said.
   The United States is the single largest market destination for Bangladeshi apparels as about 30 per cent of Bangladesh's $12.5 billion global shipments in the past financial year landed in the United States.
   The Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters' Association president, Abdus Salam Murshedy, said his company, Envoy, and another big apparel group, Nassa, had also been blamed baselessly for instigating arrest and repression on workers.
   'It is very unfortunate that the US importers and lawmakers are being misguided on the labour situation in Bangladesh. We do not support any kind of repression on workers, let alone being party to that,' he said.
   The labour and employment minister, Khandaker Mosharraf Hossain, said allegation over repression on apparel workers is false.
   'The government has taken action against outsiders who instigated violence and destruction in garment industries in recent times,' the minister said. 'It is our internal matter. The government here has the responsibility to uphold rule of law and ensure security of life and property.'
   He said vested interests were misguiding the US importers and lawmakers with baseless information.
   Mosharraf said the foreign minister, Dipu Moni, was communicating with governments and stakeholders of apparel importing countries regarding the labour situation in Bangladesh apparel industries.
   Regarding cancellation of registrations of some NGOs, he said people of an NGO, having licence to work in heath and child care sector, unlawfully continued trade union activities and instigated workers into violence.
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Number of infected people reaches 298 : Anthrax spreads menacingly



Number of infected people reaches 298 : Anthrax spreads menacingly
 

Despite the distribution of vaccine, the Anthrax is continuously spreading in different districts of the country, infecting more people with the disease. As per the latest reports, the Anthrax has been spreading every day in many districts including Kushtia and Meherpur following Pabna, Sirajganj and Tangail districts.(The New Nation)

To combat its further spread, the local government officials are yet to bring an efficacious results due to the shortages of manpower and vaccine also.

Along with the persons who have already been affected by Anthrax' about 14 new people came under the infection yesterday, with the deaths of three cows and two goats at different villages under Gangni upazila in Khustia

The Dhaka City Corporation (DCC) is yet to prepare well to prevent entering Anthrax infected cows into the city, giving scopes to the unscrupulous traders to sell Anthrax-infected beef, a concerned official of DCC on condition of anonymity told The New Nation yesterday.

However, the DCC has a plan to hold a seminar and other programmes to make the people aware against the adverse affect of consuming Anthrax -infected cows' meat, he said.

Meanwhile, following the outbreak of Anthrax' the sale of beef has sharply decline in the capital kitchen markets yesterday.

Despite the fall of sale, the price remained high one kg of beef was sold between Tk 260 and Tk 270 in the markets, according to traders.

However, the DCC is not doing enough in detecting the cows infected with 'Anthrax' due to insufficient logistic supports, a source of the organisation told The New Nation.

Customers have vented their dissatisfaction over the poor vigilance of the concerned departments on checking the sale of infected cows' meat.

"The government should take steps to prevent selling of Anthrax infected beef by the traders, " said Selina Khatun, a private bank official said.

Most of the cows are being slaughtered in an unhygienic environment at different designated slaughters-houses controlled by the DCC at several places in the capital.

Those houses can hardly accommodate thirty per cent of the cows to be slaughtered.

Besides, the cows being slaughtered at midnight have been causing hurdles to the DCC officials to visit those slaughter houses as the organisation has insufficient vehicles for the officials.

So it gives scope to the butcher to slaughter Anthrax infected cows, sources said.

The supplies of water and power in the slaughter houses of DCC are not sufficient. The insufficient places to dump unusable parts of the slaughtered cows in a risky environment.

Visiting different kitchen markets at Captain Bazar, Karwan Bazar, Fakirapool , New Market, Khilgaon and Malibagh, the correspondents found a sharp fall in selling of beef.

Though the sale of beef has fallen notably yesterday in comparison to the previous weeks, the price is still remained high, traders said.

They claimed that they were selling beef which was not infected with Anthrax.

Admitting the fall of volume of their sale, they said there was no possibility of declining the price as the number of customers would rise before Eid-ul- Fitr.

Meanwhile, the BBC Bengali service yesterday night said, even after the claim by the government that the Anthrax was its under control, the number of the people infected by Anthrax reached 298 from 213 in the last one week in different districts of the country.

"The government is laying emphasis on creating mass awareness to prevent people from buying and eating infected cows meat, " said Dr Mahmudur Rahman, Director of Institution of Epidemiology Disease and Research Centre.

http://nation.ittefaq.com/issues/2010/09/05/news0563.htm


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fwd: China’s View of South Asia and the Indian Ocean



------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Zoglul Husain

 
This is an article by Dean Cheng, who works for the Asian Studies Center at The Heritage Foundation. The Heritage Foundation is a neo-conservative (neocon) think tank in the US. It helped Presidents Reagan and Bush to formulate some or many of their policies and it strongly opposes Obama's foreign policies. Obama of course had to defeat the neocons to become the president. 
 

The writer of the article Dean Chang, in the past, worked for US defence and Homeland Security and then with the China Studies division of the Center for Naval Analyses, US. He also appeared on TV talk shows on CNN, BBC, ITN etc. His comments have been published in the Time magazine, Washington post etc.
 
The views of the article are based on President Bush's evil US-Israel-India axis and the article is advocating a gang up of the US and India to launch a war of aggression against China. The neocons perpetrated similar wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, but they were defeated in the end. If they start a war in North, Central or South Asia, then they will be defeated too - Vietnam war is a good example, where America had to bow down their head and accept defeat and so is the example of Korean war, where America had to do the same.
 


Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:33:52 +0600
Subject: China's View of South Asia and the Indian Ocean
From: bdmailer@gmail.com



China's View of South Asia and the Indian Ocean
 
Abstract: The Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly important to China's economic and security interests. China appears to be pursuing what has been widely characterized as a "string of pearls" strategy of cultivating India's neighbors as friendly states, both to protect its economic and security interests and to balance a "rising India." With Chinese influence in the region growing, it is essential that the U.S. not fall behind in the Indian Ocean, but maintain a steady presence in the region, both to signal its resolve to stay engaged and to avoid the difficulties of reentering a region.
As the People's Republic of China (PRC) expands its global economic and security interests, one region of growing importance to Beijing will be the Indian Ocean area. Not only must a significant portion of China's oil imports transit this region, but one of China's enduring friends (Pakistan) and one of its long-time rivals (India) border this region, as well as China's sensitive Tibetan flank.
Background
Historically, China dealt mostly with the kingdoms of Southeast Asia and had relatively little interaction with South Asia. Imperial Chinese interactions with the Indian Ocean region were oriented mainly toward the Burmese and Thai civilizations, through which trade routes passed from southern China.
By contrast, despite both China and India having civilizations that are thousands of years old, there were only very limited exchanges between imperial China and India. The Himalayan mountain range, the absence of a consistent Chinese maritime tradition, and the path of least resistance, which led north and west to the Eurasian steppes, all limited Chinese interactions to the south. Thus, while both China and India were some of the most powerful nations of the ancient world, they were relatively insulated from each other.
European colonialism ended Chinese and Indian isolation, both from each other and from the rest of the world, yet it affected the two major Asian powers very differently. India was conquered by the British and directly colonized. In the period of decolonization, the Indian Subcontinent was partitioned into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority East and West Pakistan (now Bangladesh and Pakistan, respectively).[1]
By contrast, although China retained nominal sovereignty, the Chinese view this period as the "Century of Humiliation." From 1840 to 1945, China lost control of its destiny. During this period, foreigners collected China's tariffs and taxes, were immune from Chinese law and prosecution, and ultimately were able to dictate China's fate. When the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) won the Chinese civil war, Mao Zedong made a point to say that China would now "stand up." For Mao and the rest of the CCP leadership, their victory marked the return of the ability of the Chinese to dictate their own future. This had two implications for Chinese views of South Asia.
The first implication is that Chinese territory is a unitary whole and inviolable. The "Century of Humiliation" saw foreign intrusions into China, the creation of concessions, and even the forcible removal of territory from Chinese control (e.g., Hong Kong and Taiwan). This would no longer be tolerated. In the South Asian context, from the perspective of the CCP leadership, Tibet, like Taiwan, is part of China, and any threat to Chinese control is wholly unacceptable.
The other implication is that China's borders have been unduly affected and influenced by foreign pressure and domination, especially through the application of "unequal treaties." Consequently, now that China is strong, it is Beijing that will determine whether it accepts the current borders or not. More to the point, from its perspective, China is under no obligation to accept borders that were demarcated by more powerful foreign parties.
Indeed, in order to "correct" border issues, the Beijing leadership has displayed a willingness to use force to underscore its position, as in the 1969 clashes with the Soviet Union and the 1962 Sino– Indian War.
Context
In addition to the colonial period, several other factors continue to influence Chinese perceptions of the Indian Ocean region.
The first is the Sino–Soviet split. Between 1949 and 1960, China and the Soviet Union were close allies. The Soviet Union, from Beijing's perspective, was a fully developed major power, capable of challenging the United States. It was also a senior partner, capable of helping China to move from a largely agrarian country to an industrialized power. China expected diplomatic, economic, industrial, and military assistance from the Soviet Union.
Yet by the time of the split in 1960, there was deep Chinese suspicion of the Soviets. This disharmony was rooted in a number of factors, including questions of who would lead the Communist bloc after the death of Stalin, ideological differences between Beijing and Moscow, and the Soviet failure to lend support to the PRC during the various Taiwan crises of the 1950s. Another component, however, was Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev's decision to support the Indians on sovereignty over Kashmir, a position that irritated China.
The Sino–Soviet split resulted in extreme Chinese animosity aimed at the Soviets, which was seen in a variety of ways, not least of which were the Sino–Soviet border clashes of 1969, the only case of two openly nuclear-armed powers engaging in direct combat. It also resulted in the Soviets providing further support to India, including arms sales, leading the Chinese to see a New Delhi–Moscow entente directed at themselves.
The second is that China is not the Soviet Union. Whereas the USSR was an autarkic nation with global political ambitions and military capabilities, but only very regional, if not primarily local, economic interests, China is a highly connected nation with regional military capabilities and global economic interests. For the first time in modern history, China is a major economic player: It exports T-shirts, washing machines, and computers, not revolution.
This is reflected not only in the various container ships that leave Chinese ports for foreign destinations, but also in the fleets of oil tankers and break-bulk carriers that are carrying oil and ore to feed the Chinese economy. The globalization of China's economy has meant an unprecedented reliance on the seas for China's economic well-being.
Linked to this is the third consideration: As its economy has grown, China has become increasingly dependent on foreign imports to fuel and sustain its economy. China became a net oil importer in 1993, the second largest consumer of oil in 2003, and the third largest importer of oil by 2004.[2] In 2010, Chinese oil imports are expected to total 210 million tons, a 5.5 percent increase over 2009 imports.[3] Much of this oil is brought to China by tankers from the Persian Gulf via the Indian Ocean and the Strait of Malacca.
Chinese Relations with South Asian States
These various factors heavily influence China's relations with its southern neighbors along the Indian Ocean littoral, especially India, but also Pakistan, Burma, and Sri Lanka.
Sino–Indian Relations. From Beijing's perspective, the most important nation in the South Asian region is India. India and China are the two most populous nations on earth. Indeed, India is expected to surpass China sometime in the 2020s.[4]
Sino–Indian relations have often been rocky. While the two states enjoyed relatively peaceful relations in the first few years after the founding of the People's Republic in 1949, the situation rapidly deteriorated, and relations between the two powers have often been frosty. Several factors have played into this, but perhaps the most important factor was and is the border issue between the two countries.
The precise demarcation of the border between China and India remains a contentious issue for both sides. There are two main swathes of territory involved in the outstanding claims by each side: Aksai Chin, west of Nepal, which is Chinese territory claimed by India, and Arunachal Pradesh ("South Tibet," as the Chinese refer to it), east of Nepal, which is Indian territory claimed by China. In each case, thousands of square miles of territory are at stake, further complicated by the sensitivity of the regions.
The confluence of border issues and minority relations first arose in 1950 because of the Chinese occupation of Tibet. In the chaos of the first Chinese revolution (in 1911), Tibet had declared itself independent in 1913 and expelled the Qing officials who oversaw the area. While this independence was not recognized by any major foreign governments, nor by the Nationalist Chinese government, the region was essentially on its own until 1949. Then, with the CCP victorious in its struggle with the Nationalists, China moved against Tibet. In 1950, several veteran divisions of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) were committed to retaking the region, and the Tibetan forces rapidly collapsed.
For the first time in modern memory, this put Chinese military forces on the Indian doorstep.
Equally important, both in 1950 and in the subsequent failed Tibetan uprising of 1959, Tibetan refugees fled to India, including the current (14th) Dalai Lama, where they established a community in exile. This is an essential part of the current controversy over the town of Tawang, which is not only a holy Buddhist site, birthplace of the 6th Dalai Lama, but also a stopping place for the current Dalai Lama as he fled from Tibet.[5]
Tawang also encapsulates the problem of historical border disputes. China claims that Tawang is actually Chinese territory because it refuses to accept the McMahon Line as the border. That line was established in 1914 between the Tibetan authorities and the then British colony of India. From the perspective of Mao and his successors, the McMahon line was imposed upon China and has no validity as the actual border.
Meanwhile, China and India also dispute their border west of Nepal, in the area known as Aksai Chin. The Aksai Chin was part of the Indian princely state of Jammu and Kashmir established in 1846, but the Chinese never accepted it as part of India. It was the Soviet decision to back the Indian claims to the Aksai Chin, over the claims of China and Pakistan, which both soured Beijing on Moscow and New Delhi and helped to push Islamabad and Beijing together.
The border issues came to a head in October 1962, when the Chinese escalated what had been a series of border skirmishes into a full-blown war. The initial border clashes between Chinese and Indian forces were precipitated by the discovery that China had built a road through Aksai Chin (completed in 1957), catching the Indians by surprise. In the eastern sector, where Tibet abuts India, Chinese forces crushed their Indian counterparts and advanced deep into India, formally occupying the Aksai Chin. China maintains control of the Aksai China in the western sector, but withdrew its forces from the eastern sector, what is now the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh. However, China still claims the eastern sector and calls it "South Tibet."
Since 1962, the two sides have maintained an uneasy peace. During the 1980s, there were artillery barrages between the two sides. In the 1990s, the two sides signed several agreements that they would try to resolve the border situation peacefully, and in 2005, they even reached an agreement on guiding principles for resolving the border issue. Nonetheless, recent reporting indicates that both the Chinese and the Indians are reinforcing their presence in the region, as China makes more public comments about their claims to Tawang and Arunachal Pradesh in general.
Indian Military Capabilities. While the Chinese military has been modernizing steadily for the past two decades, Chinese military planners cannot look to the south with absolute equanimity. In the first place, the Indians have had far easier access to advanced military technology from around the globe than the PLA.
For example, one of the effects of the Sino–Soviet split and the subsequent animosity between Beijing and Moscow was that Russia happily supplied India with more advanced weapons. Indeed, for much of the Cold War, the Indian military relied heavily on the USSR for its most modern equipment. This continues to be the case, despite warmer relations between Beijing and Moscow.
The Russians, for example, have sold the Su-30MKI, a variant of the Su-27/Su-30 airframe to India, which is seen as more advanced than the Su-30MKK, the version supplied to the PRC. Meanwhile, in a just-inked deal between Russia and India, the Russians have (finally) agreed to sell India the aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov and a complement of MiG-29K fighters.[6] India also maintains the distinction of being the only nation to have ever leased nuclear-powered submarines. In the late 1980s and again in 1991, it leased a Soviet Charlie II-class SSGN (nuclear-powered guided missile submarine) and is leasing the Nerpa, an Akula-class SSN (nuclear powered attack submarine) for 10 years.[7] This has helped India gain some of the experience necessary to build its own nuclear-powered attack submarines.[8]
Furthermore, India is also seen as a different case than China by the United States, at least in terms of access to high technology. This is apparent in the area of space technology, which is of growing potential military import. As a case in point, the Moon Mineralogy Mapper on the Chandrayaan-1 lunar exploration spacecraft, which identified significant amounts of water on the Moon, was an American instrument package. By contrast, it will likely be a very long time before the U.S. is willing to place any kind of comparable sensor system on a Chinese satellite.
In addition, China must worry about India's nuclear capabilities. The recent tests of the Agni-II and Agni-III missiles, with ranges of 2,000 and 3,000 kilometers, respectively, means that India is developing the capability to threaten major Chinese cities, such as Chengdu and Kunming in western and southern China.[9] While the Chinese are unlikely to fear an Indian nuclear first strike, they cannot neglect the existence of an independent nuclear force that exists apart from the United States and Russia.
Even long-term demographic differences between China and India have military implications. Although both China and India have more than a billion people, the demographics are very different. China has a population bulge, a legacy of Mao Zedong's Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, when he pushed Chinese families to have as many children as possible, followed by Deng Xiaoping and the one-child policy. As a result, China has the 4-2-1 phenomenon, in which one child is supporting two parents and four grandparents.
Such demographic conditions not only have social welfare implications, but also suggest that China may have fewer people coming of military age by the mid-2020s. Moreover, given the importance of the children to maintaining the welfare of both parents and grandparents, any conflict involving heavy casualties would likely generate significant social tension, if not outright instability. The popular reaction to the deaths of hundreds of children in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake provides a potential warning in this regard.[10]
India, by contrast, appears to have a more sustainable demographic composition, with people under the age of 15 remaining around 30 percent of the population between now and 2020. That is, evidence indicates that the Indian population will not age the way the Chinese one will. In 2020–2030, when India surpasses China in overall population, India will not only be more populous, but also likely have a larger percentage of its population of military age. For Chinese military planners, this would suggest that, after 2020, China may face the unprecedented challenge of confronting an opponent able to field larger armies than its own.
For the PRC, such prospects do not make a conflict with India inevitable. Rather, they highlight the importance of China's southern flank and the dynamic nature of the Sino–Indian balance of power. Equally important, it casts a harsh light on the potential vulnerability of China's sea lanes of communications. A strong Indian military, fielding both nuclear and advanced conventional capabilities, could hold the PRC at risk both directly and indirectly.
Economic Issues. Unlike the Taiwan–China situation, the Sino–Indian security relationship is not balanced by a substantial economic one. While Sino–Indian economic ties have expanded, they are still relatively limited. In 2000, Sino–Indian trade totaled only about $2.2 billion, with Chinese exports to India accounting for $1.5 billion. By 2008, bilateral trade had expanded by perhaps 25 times, to some $50 billion. Moreover, this was more equalized, with Indian exports to China totaling $20 billion, and Chinese exports to India comprising some $32 billion.[11]
While India is not a major trading partner for China, Beijing is New Delhi's second largest trading partner behind the U.S. The level of U.S.–China trade far outstrips that of U.S.–India trade levels. China, for example, had a $333 billion trade relationship with the United States in 2008, 10 times its trade with India.[12] Meanwhile, U.S.–India trade totaled only about $65 billion in 2009.[13]
Sino–Pakistani Relations. While China's relations with India have generally been rocky, its ties with Pakistan have been much better. Pakistan established formal diplomatic relations with Beijing in 1950, one of the very first countries to recognize the People's Republic of China rather than the Republic of China. Although Pakistan later joined both CENTO (Central Treaty Organization) and SEATO (Southeast Asia Treaty Organization), this did not impinge heavily on Sino–Pakistani relations. Similarly, despite the embargos and sanctions placed on China during the Korean War, Pakistan maintained trade and diplomatic ties to the PRC.
Once Sino–Indian relations deteriorated, China and Pakistan had a further reason to align—their common enemy of India. While the two states have not formally allied against India, both sides clearly benefit from a relationship that can tie down significant Indian assets along multiple fronts and force Indian planners to divide their attention. Thus, there are reports that, in the midst of the 1965 Indo–Pakistani War, China repeatedly charged India with violating the Chinese border near Sikkim, at the other end of the Sino–Indian border from Pakistan, raising the specter of an armed response.[14] While there were no actual clashes at this time, it is possible that any such Chinese actions were intended to relieve pressure on Pakistan, which was losing in that war, by threatening India with the possibility of a second front.[15]
More concretely, China has long been willing to help Pakistan with arms development and access. China, for example, was instrumental in helping to establish Pakistan's arms industry.[16] China has also long supplied the Pakistani military with a range of military systems, including tanks, naval combatants, and combat aircraft. For example, China and Pakistan currently coproduce the K-8 trainer and the JF-17 Thunder/FC-1 Xiaolong, a few examples of Chinese weapons coproduction with foreign partners.
Perhaps of greatest concern is the likelihood of Chinese assistance with missiles and nuclear weapons. China has supplied Pakistan with the M-11 series of short-range ballistic missiles. China has helped Pakistan build two nuclear reactors at the Chasma site in the Punjab Province and is considering building two more nuclear reactors at the same site. Beijing must weigh potential negative international reaction to such a move, however, because it is a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group, which forbids nuclear transfers to countries that are not signatories of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. It has the option of seeking a waiver of the prohibition or proceeding in spite of the prohibition. In addition, A. Q. Khan, the Pakistani nuclear scientist, claims that the PRC helped Pakistan develop its nuclear weapons, including the provision of nuclear materials.[17] While this claim has not been officially corroborated or acknowledged, the story is a reminder of the close Sino–Pakistani ties in strategic systems.
Meanwhile, Pakistan has been willing to take measures to ensure continued Chinese support. These include clamping down on Uighur radicals from China's restive Xinjiang province attending terrorist training camps in Pakistan's tribal border areas.[18] If Pakistan failed to take action to stem the radicalization and training of Uighur separatists on its territory, Islamabad would likely alienate the Beijing leadership and seriously jeopardize the strategic relationship between Pakistan and China.
Economic Relations. One of the first planks of Sino–Pakistani relations was economic, with trade relations started in 1950. By 2002, bilateral trade amounted to some $1.8 billion, and has since grown to some $7 billion as of 2008.[19] This is, however, a small fraction of Chinese trade with the United States or the nations of East Asia.
While Sino–Pakistani trade is limited, there have been a number of high-profile developments. The most often cited example is the Chinese economic assistance and cooperation in the development of the port of Gwadar. Beijing provided both financing and workers for the port's development, including $200 million as an initial investment and the construction of three multipurpose berths.[20] While the port's location provides a convenient facility near the Persian Gulf, but outside the Strait of Hormuz, it has not yet generated income for the Pakistani economy due to a lack of transportation infrastructure connecting the port with Pakistan's road and rail network.[21] The port does serve, however, to diversify Pakistani naval facilities.
At the same time, there is much speculation that the port may serve as a western terminus on the Indian Ocean for the movement of oil or other supplies into China. This would significantly reduce the exposure of the Chinese oil lifeline in the Indian Ocean, eliminating the need to transit those waters and pass through the Malacca Strait.
Chinese Relations with Other Indian Ocean Nations
In addition to India and Pakistan, China has a range of relations with the other states of the Indian Ocean littoral. It has been suggested that China is cultivating relations with many of these states, both to forge a nascent anti-India political coalition and to access military facilities so that China itself can counter India. This latter approach has sometimes been referred to as the "string of pearls" approach.
Burma. China is one of the few states to support the regime in Burma. This is due to a combination of geopolitical and economic considerations. Burma's Irrawaddy Valley has long been a strategic path into China. The Burma Road of World War II is merely the most well known example, and a version of the Silk Route transited the Irrawaddy into Yunnan as well.
Moreover, Burma has potential oil and natural gas reserves. The ability to access those oil reserves would again limit Chinese vulnerability to interdiction of its sea lines. Not surprisingly, China is helping to construct oil pipelines across Burma and into China. It is also helping to construct new port facilities in Sittwe, Dawei, and Mergui.[22]
Meanwhile, Burma, lying to the east of India, constitutes yet another potential area of worry for Indian strategic planners. Strategically, Burma and China have been engaged in a variety of security cooperation measures. The PRC is the largest source of arms for the Burmese military, supplying a variety of systems, including trucks, artillery, and communications equipment.[23] Chinese support has been sustained, even after Burmese crackdowns in 2009 led several thousand refugees to flee Burma into southern China.[24]
In return, Burmese willingness to allow the PLA access to its territory potentially allows China to maintain a close watch on Indian military developments. Of particular interest are the Coco Islands, from which China can watch Indian space and missile launches. They are also 18 kilometers from the Indian-held Nicobar Islands, which one Indian foreign minister has characterized as essential for allowing India to monitor the Malacca Strait.
Sri Lanka. China also has a long history of good relations with Sri Lanka. Indeed, Sri Lanka, along with Pakistan, was one of the first non-Communist countries to establish relations with the PRC, recognizing the PRC in 1950. Given the long history of positive relations between the two states, it is not surprising that Beijing has provided Colombo with military and political support during its long counterinsurgency, including significant supplies of fighter aircraft, naval combatants, and a variety of other military equipment.
Equally important, Chinese support has the added attraction that Beijing does not "interfere" in the domestic affairs of the nation receiving the aid. This appeal has been at work not only in Sri Lanka, but also in Pakistan and Burma. Thus, there were few Chinese criticisms of Sri Lankan efforts to deal with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (Tamil Tigers). Of course, this is a sharp contrast with Western NGOs and governments, which expressed concern that the Sri Lankan counterinsurgency methods were excessively brutal. For example, the United States suspended aid to Colombo in 2007 on human rights grounds.[25]
Nor are relations between the two states purely military. Chinese Vice Premier Zhang Dejiang, in his recent visit to Sri Lanka, expressed the hope that the two states would deepen their cooperation in such areas as "infrastructure, industry, communication, energy, education, culture, tourism."[26] As with other Indian Ocean states, China has been assiduous in economic cooperation with Sri Lanka. Two ongoing projects are the Norochcholai Coal Power Project and construction of a large container port at Hambantota, with some $300 million in funding from China's Export-Import Bank.[27]
The Norochcholai Coal Power Project involves the construction of a 300-megawatt coal-fired generator, with the potential for expansion to 900 megawatts.[28] The plant would help meet likely Sri Lankan power requirements for the coming decades. Interestingly, Sri Lanka produces no fossil fuels of its own and will therefore need to import the coal needed for the plant. This may well involve coal imports from China, one of the world's largest coal producers.
Meanwhile, the Hambantota port project will help to improve an underdeveloped portion of Sri Lanka. At the same time, it is recognized that there are also strategic benefits for the PRC. At a minimum, it would provide "a convenient mid-way point on the sea-routes between China, and the Middle East and Africa. The port development and the oil-bunkering/storage facilities, when completed in Hambantota, would be a mutually beneficial asset to both countries."[29] There is concern in some quarters that this assistance will also result in Chinese naval access to the port.
Prospects for the Future
For the foreseeable future, Chinese strategic planners will need to pay increasing attention to China's Indian Ocean flank. In the short term, China is concerned about its growing dependence on the sea lanes of communications for sustaining China's economic growth. In 2010, for the first time, China imported more than 50 percent of its oil consumption. Chinese President Hu Jintao has already raised the issue of the Malacca Strait. There is little question that it is a key chokepoint on China's oil supply routes. Part of China's interest in developing alternative ports and pipelines, such as in Pakistan and Burma, would seem to be motivated by a desire to reduce the criticality of the Malacca Strait.
Even if China's oil lifeline did not have to transit the Strait of Malacca, it would nonetheless traverse significant portions of the Indian Ocean. The growth of the Indian navy means that Chinese economic development is potentially at the mercy of India, as well as the United States. The forging of Indian security links with Japan and the United States is therefore a source of concern.
This is likely an essential part of what is driving Chinese efforts to cultivate India's neighbors as friendly states, beyond the "string of pearls" strategy that China is said to entertain for the Indian Ocean region. That is, China is more intent on cultivating close ties, including but not limited to military ties, with the various South Asian states than necessarily focusing on surrounding and isolating India. The latter is simply a byproduct of the larger goal of ensuring that China's southern flank and the attendant oil lifeline are secure and populated by friendly states.
Balancing India is likely to be a growing Chinese concern, not simply for the security of China's oil lifeline, but also because of India's overall growth. Just as the U.S. is concerned about a "rising China" and how to deal with a growing Chinese economy that provides substantially more wherewithal for a variety of purposes, so Chinese leaders are confronted with the potential of a "rising India."
While the United States is already an established, advanced state, China is not. That is, from the Chinese perspective, the United States and much of the West are already wealthy societies. The American economy, still the world's largest, allows the U.S. to maintain substantial military capabilities, sustain a high standard of living at home, and still have resources for a range of other purposes, from diplomacy and foreign aid to a space program.
China is less developed, and while Chinese economic growth over the past several decades has been impressive, any gains must be divided across 1.2 billion to 1.3 billion people. Therefore, on a per capita basis, China is still a developing country. The potential concern is that India will catch up with China before China catches up with the United States or even Western Europe. All of this means that China must devote more attention and effort to staying ahead of India because it has less of a margin for error.
Recommendations for U.S. Policy
For the United States, the need to balance the PRC, among other factors, necessitates greater cooperation with India. New Delhi, for its part, also is interested in strengthening ties to the U.S., partly as a hedge against a rising China, but will maintain its foreign policy principle of "strategic autonomy" and seek partnerships with a variety of nations.
Deepening Indo–U.S. Cooperation. Throughout the Cold War era, the U.S. and India experienced rocky relations, given India's closeness to the Soviet Union. However, beginning from the late years of the Clinton Administration through the George W. Bush Administration, the U.S. has sought to deepen and improve its relations with India. This has included several forms, including a willingness to sell advanced weapons to India; technology cooperation in a number of fields, including space systems; and a willingness to provide India with nuclear technology. The very range of areas of potential cooperation is encouraging because it signals that Washington–New Delhi relations are not simply a matter of containing China, but inherently beneficial across a breadth of topics. The United States should sustain this effort at broad interaction and deepen its strategic ties with India.
Expanding U.S. Cooperation with Other Indian Ocean Nations. While the U.S. is engaging India and continuing its partnership with Pakistan, it should also seek to remain closely engaged with the other states of the Indian Ocean littoral. If China has succeeded in expanding its footprint in South Asia, it is in part because it has not had much competition.
In the military arena, this includes promoting U.S. Navy port visits to states that border the Indian Ocean and expanding the International Military Education and Training Program for officers drawn from South Asian militaries. In the non-military arena, it should encourage students from nations in the region to attend schools in the United States. Such personal exposure to the U.S. often has long-lasting impacts. Meanwhile, the United States should support aid programs to the area, not only at the nation-to-nation level (e.g., the International Monetary Fund), but also at the more personal level. The Grameen Bank, which was one of the pioneers of microcredit, was founded in Bangladesh.[30] Encouraging such grassroots efforts would require minimal amounts of capital, but could have enormous impact by promoting not only business but also social stability.
Maintaining a Strong U.S. Presence in the Region. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates appears sanguine about cuts in the U.S. Navy, even questioning whether it is necessary to maintain 10 carrier battle groups when other nations have none. Such comments, however, betray a failure to account for not only how long it takes the U.S. to build an aircraft carrier and its support ships, not to mention training its attendant air wing, but also the undesirability of allowing others to catch up.
It is essential that the U.S. not fall behind in the Indian Ocean. The region is about as far from the United States as it is possible to be, but the U.S. should strive to maintain a steady presence in the region, both to signal its resolve to stay engaged and to avoid the difficulties of reentering a region. The yearlong Chinese presence in the anti-piracy patrols off the Gulf of Aden, coupled with Chinese comments regarding the prospect of creating a base infrastructure in the region, suggests that the PRC intends to be a long-term player in the area. The United States can ill afford to cede this vital region to the PLA.
Dean Cheng is Research Fellow in Chinese Political and Security Affairs in the Asian Studies Center at The Heritage Foundation.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Lecture/China-s-View-of-South-Asia-and-the-Indian-Ocean


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Re: Breaking News...Ershad's military regime illegal

Hasina's regime should also be declared illegal.
For hanky-pankying with a fraud criminal like Ershad, for making an alliance with Ershad and his ILLEGAL party, should NOT Hasina's regime also be illegal?

Any normal law would say YES.


--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, qrahman@... wrote:
>
>
> I am looking forward to it. Should me funnier than eid dramas.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: anis.ahmed@... <anis.ahmed@...>
> To: ovimot@yahoogroups.com; alochona@yahoogroups.com; sonarbangladesh@yahoogroups.com; bangla-vision@yahoogroups.com; Bangladesh-Zindabad@yahoogroups.com; WideMinds@yahoogroups.com; notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com; Diagnose@yahoogroups.com; alochona@yahoogroups.com; odhora@yahoogroups.com; history_islam@yahoogroups.com; mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com; alapon@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: faruquealamgir@...; abid.bahar@...; abidbahar@...; amin_chaudhury@...; aminul_islam_raj@...; s_ayubi786@...; rivercrossinternational@...
> Sent: Thu, Aug 26, 2010 8:47 pm
> Subject: [ALOCHONA] Breaking News...Ershad's military regime illegal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Breaking News...Ershad's military regime illegal
>
> "Dhaka, Aug 26 (bdnews24.com)â€"In a landmark verdict, the High Court has declared illegal the Seventh Amendment to the constitution that had legalised the autocratic regime of military strongman Hussein Muhammad Ershad.
>
> The bench of justices A H M Shamsuddin Chowdhury and Sheikh Mohammad Zakir Hossain handed down its ruling on Thursday."
>
> Please go to the following link for detail information:
>
> http://www.bdnews24.com/details.php?cid=3&id=171753&hb=2
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance
> If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program
> SeeRefinanceRates.com
>


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[ALOCHONA] Canadian Bengali News.....



The Canadian Bengali News paper BENGALI TIMES is Online Now. You can see lots of exclusive news,features, video,cricket highlights,weather, hot talk and many more things here. You can visit-

www.thebengalitimes.com

 

 

Regards,

 

Samia Jaman
-------------------
Project Director
FTV
777-112 Huntlay, Toronto
ON M6H 1V4
CANADA.
 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Food grain stock dips



Food grain stock dips
 
 
Govt fails to achieve rice procurement target; private importers active
 
The government is finding it hard to stock up on food grains because of their high price in local and international markets.However, food import by the private sector is on the rise, as traders seek to maximise profit amid the government's procurement shortfall.
 
The government had a target to procure 12 lakh tonnes of boro rice at Tk 25 per kg from the local market between May 1 and August 31. But it achieved only 38 percent of the target.To better the response from the suppliers, the government has offered an incentive of Tk 3 per kg, pushing the procurement price to Tk 28 a kg.
 
It has also taken steps to import food grains from the international market. But importers have been dilly-dallying to supply food grains as per the agreements with the government.
 
The food division has so far forfeited security deposits of three suppliers for failure to deliver. The suppliers had signed agreements with the government in the last fiscal year to import 1.60 lakh tonnes of wheatComing to power in January 2009, the government announced it would build up a stock of 15 lakh tonnes of food grains, 5 lakh tonnes more than what is considered to be a safe stock.
 
But the stock, in fact, has almost halved over the past year. It was 7.19 lakh tonnes on August 21, compared to 13.75 lakh tonnes on the day last year, says the food ministry in a report to the purchase committee.
 
Within the original time limit for the procurement drive, the government could buy only 4.66 lakh tonnes of rice. Against this backdrop, the food ministry has extended the deadline until September 30, said ministry sources.
 
The target, however, is still unlikely to be met since the price of rice in the open market is higher than that fixed by the government, notes the food ministry report.At present, the price of coarse rice in the open market is Tk 30 to 32 a kg, whereas the government-set price is Tk 28 including the incentive.
 
Meanwhile, Russia, a major wheat exporter, has banned export of all cereals for this fiscal year in the wake of draught and unprecedented heat wave. As a result, wheat price in the international market has become unstable.
 Import of 3 lakh tonnes of wheat from Russia was finalised at government-to-government level. Later, the country agreed to supply only 1 lakh tonne, but stepped back from that pledge too.
 
The efforts to procure food grains through import could not succeed because of high prices in the international market, the report says.
 
The price of a rice variety, which was $460 per tonne on June 3, increased to $470 per tonne on August 10. In July, the price of a wheat variety was $223 per tonne, around 25 percent up on the corresponding period last year.
 
Amid these constraints, the government has made a move to import food grains from Vietnam and India through state-to-state level agreements.The purchase committee has already approved a proposal to import 1 lakh tonnes of rice from Vietnam. The price, which was first set at $389 per tonne, has been revised to $407 due to a recent hike in the international market. Now the government will buy 80,000 tonnes at $407 and the remaining amount at the previous rate.Besides, a food ministry delegation is visiting New Delhi to discuss rice import from India.
 
Meanwhile, the private sector has increased import of food grains.A data from the Bangladesh Bank shows that 31.60 lakh tonnes of rice and wheat were imported from July 2009 to May 2010, while the amount was 29.52 lakh tonnes during the same period last fiscal year.
 
Also, statistics show that L/C issued for rice and wheat imports during fiscal year 2009-10 are 61 and 259 percent up respectively, compared to FY 2008-09.
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___