Banner Advertiser

Monday, May 25, 2009

[ALOCHONA] 11 killed as Aila rips thru coastline



11 killed as Aila rips thru coastline
Courtesy New Age 26/5/09

 

At least eleven persons were killed, scores injured, large tracts of cropland damaged and several thousand houses totally or partially damaged when cyclone Aila made landfall on the India-Bangladesh coast near Sagardwip at a speed of 100 km per hour on Monday afternoon.
   Tidal surges as high as seven-eight feet struck the coastal districts of Bangladesh, accompanied by heavy showers and winds blowing at 100kmph, and battering the villages and destroying a significant amount of crops.
   The authorities shifted the people from the vulnerable areas to cyclone shelters after a deep depression turned into a cyclone on Sunday night.
   Fifty-two fishing trawlers, with 1,200 fishermen on board, which had ventured into deep sea earlier, are yet to reach the coast, said the trawler owners’ association in Patuakhali and Barguna.
   Eight trawlers were capsized in Bhola and Khulna and 25 of the passengers went missing.
   The private television channels, meanwhile, said at least 20 people died in cyclone hit.
   Standing Rabi crops in large tracts of cropland have been damaged in Khulna, Barisal, and Noakhali. Seasonal crops on 500 hectares of land were damaged in Noakhali. At Bakerganj in Barisal crops on 25,000 acres of land were damaged, along with chilli on 400 acres.
   Disaster management minister Abdur Razzaq, at a briefing in Dhaka, confirmed the death of five persons. He said PM Sheikh Hasina has already directed the lawmakers to visit the affected areas and launch relief operations.
   The minister said the armed forces will also be deployed for relief operations along with 42,000 volunteers of the ministry. He said the government has allocated about 1,000 tonnes of rice and Tk 12 lakh in cash for relief operations.
   Abdul Aziz Mallik, of Karpurkathi in Bauphal, died after a tree fell on him on Monday morning. Razzaq Gazi of village Hosnabad died from cardiac arrest at Bauphal cyclone shelter. Two year old girl Sumaiya drowned in Galachipa. Minor boy Rabbi, son of Rabiul Molla of Char Lakshmi Bardhan of Bakerganj, drowned on Monday noon. Maruf, 7, son of Saiful, and Rajib, 15, son of Abdul Mannan Majhi, were killed at Boyarchar in Hatiya, and Najma Akhtar, 7, of Nijhum Dwip died in the storm. Nazimuddin died as a trawler capsized at Char Kachchapia of Charfashon, and a minor girl, Rozina, died at Char Kalatali as their house collapsed on her. Amena Begum, 48, wife of Ayub Ali, and Shahida Begum,11, of Chargazaria in Ramgati of Laksmipur died as their
   houses collapsed on them.
   Aila, the second of the North Indian Ocean cyclones this season, hit the West Bengal coast near Sagardwip at about 2:00pm, and the eye of the storm crossed the coast, near Diamond Harbour, at around 3:00pm. It was moving northwards and weakening gradually.
   Work at the maritime ports of Chittagong and Mongla were suspended from Monday morning. The district headquarters of Patuakhali and Barguna, and most upazila towns along coast, went under seven to eight feet of high water as Aila advanced towards the coast.
   Mongla Port was asked to hoist Danger Signal No 7 and Chittagong and Cox’s Bazar ports were asked to show Danger Signal No 6.
   The Chittagong Port’s secretary, Farhad Uddin, said they had moved 23 ships anchored in the jetties to the Outer Anchorage and had made all the preparations to protect the port. The Mongla Port authorities also moved all the vessels to safer places.
   River transportation in the southern region remained suspended as the authorities restricted the plying of vessels less than 65 feet in length. No vessel left Dhaka on 39 routes to the southern districts on Monday. Ferry services in the Paturia-Daulatdia and Mawa-Char Janazat routes were also suspended.
   Several hundred villages in Satkhira, Bagerhat, Patuakhali, Barguna and Bhola went under water as the protective embankments were breached at least at 100 points in the coastal districts.
   The Kalapara Met Office recorded 126 millimetres of rainfall in the past 24 hours, ending on Monday noon. A trawler sank at Char Kachchhapia of Char Fassion in Bhola because of gusty winds.
   The wind was blowing at 60-80kmph in gusts or squalls in the coastal areas since Monday morning, and it sometimes reached the speed of more than 100kmph.
   In the Barisal region the power supply lines snapped, leading to prolonged black-outs. Rezaul Alam, executive engineer of Barisal Electric Supply Division-2, said power supply was disrupted after a newly erected 11 kilovolt pole fell on a 33KV line.
   The most affected upazilas in Khulna were Koyra, Paikgachha, Dakop and Batiaghata where about 20,000 people were marooned and at least 500 thatched houses collapsed. The tidal surge hit the dams of the Water Development Board and washed away about 700 shrimp enclosures.
   The district administrations opened emergency control rooms in nine upazilas and asked people over loudspeakers to take shelter in safer places.
   In Satkhira the tidal surge damaged a cross-dam and submerged many villages in Gabura and Padmapukur unions in Shyamnagar upazila on Monday morning. Locals said the cross-dam was damaged at eight points in the two unions. The district administration has already opened 285 cyclone shelters.
   It has also asked the people of Shyamnagar and Ashashuni upazilas to take shelter in the centres.
   The Bauphal upazila nirbahi officer, SM Ansaruzzman, told New Age that the administration had tried to shift the people from the remote chars as there is only a single cyclone shelter in Char Miajan. He said embankments were breached in many places in the coastal region and said that a 100-metre stretch of the Kalaiya-Nazirpur road was washed by high water.
   The officer in charge of Galachipa police station, Nasir Mallick, said five persons had gone missing at Char Motahar and the administration was trying to rescue the people stranded in the chars but had failed so far due to the eight-ten feet high waves on the river’s estuary.
   The New Age correspondent in Cox’s Bazar said hundreds of houses were washed away by the three to four feet high tidal surge in the coastal areas of the district.
   The coastal embankment was also seriously damaged at several places from Teknaf to Kutubdia. The Cox’s Bazar-Teknaf Marine Drive became vulnerable at Himchhari point.
   According to information gathered from the coastal areas of the district, at least 200 houses in Cox’s Bazar town, Kutubdia, Pekoua, Sha Parir Dwip and St Martin’s Island in Teknaf have been washed away in the short period between 10:00am and noon.
   St Martin’s Union Parishad’s chairman, Firoz Ahmad Khan, said tidal surges had hit the island three times since the morning
   Sarwar Kamal, acting mayor of the Cox’s Bazar municipality, said at least 5,000 houses adjacent to Cox’s Bazar airport were hit by tidal surges as high as three to five feet in the morning.
   Md Shamsul Karim, executive engineer of the Cox’s Bazar Water Development Board, said that more than a hundred kilometres of coastal embankments were badly damaged by the tidal surge.
   In Bhola over 300 houses in Doulatkhan upazila were damaged and a large area was inundated in Char Fasson, and Monpura upazila’s protection dam collapsed.
   The low-lying areas of Nijhum Dwip in Noakhali went under 6-7 feet water and most of its inhabitants have been removed to cyclone shelters. The forest department officers fear that a number of deer living in the wildlife sanctuary have died due to the tidal surge.
   Reports from Noakhali said 7km of embankments in Tamaraddi Bazaar in Hatiya upazila collapsed because of the surging water’s pressure.

 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Minister’s Anger Against the Fifth Amendment, not Against the Fourth



Minister's Anger Against the Fifth Amendment, not Against the Fourth

Dr.M.T. Hussain
 
Law Minister's Anger
Sheikh Hasina's Law Minister Shafiq Ahmad in a function of the BBC Bangla Radio I tuned in on the 24th May evening in got stunned to hear from the mouth of the minister that he had deep anger against the Fifth Amendment of the Bangladesh Constitution. His anger fell on the issue that the basic foundation of the Constitution had been ripped apart (SINNO VINNO KORE FELA HOESE- his Bengali verbatim). I had right then the feeling, if I could ask him, he should have had reminded himself that the basic foundations of the Constitution of 1972 had first of all and over four years ahead of the Fifth Amendment been ripped into pieces by the Fourth Amendment adopted on the 25th January 1975.
Pluralism of 1972 Constitution Shattered
Despite many grumbling on the modus operandi of framing the 1972 Constitution, as many skeptics took it that the document had been dictated from behind by external source, the Bangladeshi actors being the show boys, and further that the Constitution took shape in continuation of the State of Pakistan as the Members of the Parliament who framed the document had been elected earlier in the 1970 December election under the LFO (Legal Framework Order of the President of Pakistan), it had a very good element in the basic principle that Bangladesh would remain attached in perpetuity to pluralism and multi-party parliamentary democracy. Unfortunately, this pluralism was badly attacked by the rulers in independent Bangladesh at each and every point. The misuse of the process by the self- seeking rulers made a mess of everything and so mistakenly went to kill the system and replaced with one party draconian dictatorship styled as the BAKSAL Bangladesh Krishak Sramik Awami League). That is what evil the Fourth Amendment did.
BAKSAL's Dictatorship
One may further wonder in the fact that the absolute leader who went in a still draconian way to pass the Fourth Amendment did the change from pluralism to one party rule not in due parliamentary process by a sort of dictate in the floor of the House permitting none but the only leader to speak and he made the announcement for the BAKSAL in only 13 minutes wonder session of the House! The leader further declared himself the top boss of the BAKSAL and that of the State, the lifetime President of Bangladesh with no scope kept open in case of the obvious need for change for peaceful transfer of power to the next person.
Gagging and Oppression
The unfortunate others for the freedom loving people of the country followed in evils like gagging of the press that enjoyed freedom since the long past, oppression of the dissenting views in politics by the special but unconstitutional Para Military force labeled as the Rakhhi Bahini. Quite amazingly this Rakhhi Bahini had been planned, organized, trained, motivated and armed by the Indian intelligence Agency, the R&AW directly under the Indian General Ovan. The Fourth Amendment reinforced these anti-national issues and so put bars on the freedom of the people of the country that they fought for in the past and in 1971.
Parliament made the Fifth Amendment
The Fifth Amendment enacted in early April 1979 not only was done by the duly elected Parliament in due process but also restored pluralism and multi-party democracy in Bangladesh that the 1972 Constitution had incorporated.
Other Marginal Changes
The two other marginal changes of the 1972 Constitution made in the Fifth Amendment were in regard to one, Bengali nationalism to Bangladeshi nationalism was nothing in any basic assumption as not Bengali speakers alone, let alone the ethnic Bengalese, constituted the citizens of Bangladesh. In respect of the principle of 'Socialism' of the 1972 Constitution, things so changed and developed all around the world and changed economic outlooks, incorporation of 'Social Justice' for 'Socialism' rightly fitted the demand of time. 'Secularism' adopted in the 1972 Constitution had little relevance with the aspirations of the devoutly religious people of the country. Should any serious government wish in this question to take any nod or not of the people they may well go for a referendum even in this period of the Awami administration that apparently professes to be 'secular' in politics.
None is 100% Secular
No society is 100% secular, because, the people have belief in some form of religion and spiritualism that underpins the psyche of nation and country concerned that affects politics, as well. The latest survey in the USA found that 95% of the American people are religious believing in the supreme lone God (Barack Obama, , Audacity of Hope, 2006, p.198). Whosoever would present India as a model he/she must note that the Indian Constitution does not have any written or set article therein about secularism but a casual mention in the preamble that did not provide for anything obligatory to follow in actions by the government.. Indian former President APJ A. Kalam has candidly advised his people and the younger generation, in particular, on the issue 'that the foundation of secularism in India has to be derived from spirituality' (APJ A. Kalam, Ignited Minds, 2002, P.114). Britain, the provider of Parliamentary democracy to Bangladesh is not a secular country but a religious one, the Crown or the Queen/King being the head of both temporal and spiritual matters through the Anglican Church. There is no bar there to form religious based political party. In many European countries, there are religious based political parties. However, such parties are not allowed in Communist countries. Bangladesh is not a Communist country; there is very little or no possibility that Bangladesh would turn into an irreligious communist country even if Communists would take political powers. That was what rightly the Fifth Amendment did by replacing the trend of irreligiousness and gave a firm base for religiosity by both amendments, the Fifth putting 'absolute trust and faith in the Almighty Allah' and followed logically by the 8th adopting Islam as the State Religion, few years latter. Both steps were highly appreciated in general by the millions of religious people of the country.
BAKSAL and Bismillah
The Law Minister, however, elsewhere made a casual remark that even if the 5th Amendment would be scrapped neither Bismillah would be abandoned from the top of the Constitution nor the BAKSAL be re-introduced. Was not that funny? How could the secular constitution accept Bismillah at the top being that a nonreligious document? Why would not the other religious people object to that and would not press for their religious icons inserted along with?
Legal Complications
Scrapping of the 5th Amendment should automatically back the constitutional position of the country to BAKSAL syndrome. Well, reverting back from BAKSAL to the multi-party system would certainly need amendment to be passed in the Parliament. But whether the existing Awami League Jote Members could pass any such amendment would be another question of new legal complicacy. In other words, the romantics like the Law Minister would put the country from one legal complication to another, if not from the fry pan to the fire.
Romantics
It may thus be concluded that the few romantics and the daydreamers would only cram for scrapping off the Fifth Amendment of the Bangladesh Constitution.



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [ALOCHONA] Border guards anxious about job, future



I saw the interview of the guy who is in charge of this overhaul or rebranding of the BDR (I am drawing a blank. Can't remember his name), and he said that the govt. has executive 52 "decisions" to evaluate BDR, but he didn't mention which ones. I am not surprised. Like most of the things BAL govt. would do, this would be a hogwash, half-assed job of reorganizing our border forces. They will change the image of BDR, but I doubt things will change in its core. Our Army would continue to dominate over it, and resentment will grow. BAL's attempt to re-brand BDR shows its lack of foresight or competence, and total absence of leadership on the PM's part. Enough said!
 
C


From: Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo.com>
To: Dhaka Mails <dhakamails@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 8:10:51 PM
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Border guards anxious about job, future


Opposed to change in name, uniform, logo and motto 

Borders guards are working in the frontiers with anxiety and disappointment over the government's move to restructure the Bangladesh Rifles after the February 25–26 rebellion n its headquarters in Dhaka.
   Spot visits to frontiers such as Boikari and Bhomra in Satkhira, Benapole in Jessore, Moghalhat, Durgapur and Baniyatari in Lalmonirhat and Tamabil, Shreepur and Jaintapur in Sylhet on Thursday showed that border guards in the areas were anxious and bereft of hope.


   Although the guards claimed borders were secure, local residents alleged that cross-border smuggling had increased in recent days as the BDR soldiers were guarding the borders amid anxiety.
   The visits also found that nayek subedars were commanding soldiers in the border outposts and subedars in company offices.


   Some nayek subedars and subedars told New Age they were commanding the soldiers in guarding the borders at the directive of their officers in the army. The officers sometimes visit the outposts and company offices, they said.


   Expressing disappointment at the government move for the BDR reorganisation, the border guards said they were anxious about their jobs and future after they came to know of the move from media reports and their fellows.
   The Bangladesh Rifles has become an icon of national security for the performance of the soldiers since Bangladesh's war of independence in 1971, they said, adding the paramilitary force should not be destroyed in the name of reorganisation.


   They also differed with the views expressed by some ministers about taking help from neighbouring countries for the reorganisation of the Bangladesh Rifles.
   Such a move will be disastrous for the national security, they said.
   It will be better not to change the name, uniform and the logo of the force, they said, adding that the people involved in the rebellion and the killing should be punished in an open, fair trial, but innocent soldiers should in no way be harassed.


   They also observed the rebellion had resulted from longstanding grievances of soldiers and such grievances should be addressed properly to stop the recurrence of any such incident.
   The New Age correspondent in Khulna said a soldier, working in the Bhomra frontier, said, 'We are patriots. We have proved it by working in remote frontiers. So the Bangladesh Rifles should not be destroyed in the name of reorganisation.'


   'As members of a disciplined force, we have nothing to do but to follow all the government decisions,' said a havildar working in the Satkhira border.
   Qualitative changes can be brought about in the Bangladesh Rifles, but it would be better not to change the name, uniform, logo and moto as the force has a long, glorious past, he said, adding the people involved in the rebellion and killing should be punished.


   A nayek subedar said they were worried about their jobs and future.
   The correspondent in Sylhet said the border guards in the outposts of Tamabil, Shreepur and Jaintapur seemed anxious.
   When they were asked about their condition, they said the countrymen knew well about the situation they were facing.
   A soldier said, 'We hope the government finally will make a positive decision about the Bangladesh Rifles.'


   Another soldier said they had lost their moral strength after the rebellion and the government move to restructure the Bangladesh Rifles. 'We want to serve the nation as we earlier did.'
   Help from neighbouring countries for BDR reorganisation will not be wise 'as they are our counterparts,' he said.


   Tamabil company commander nayek subedar Zaynal Abedin and Jaintapur border outpost commander nayek subedar Younus claimed that the frontiers were secure.
   Local residents of frontier upazilas such as Companiganj, Jaintapur, Goainghat, Kanaighat and Jakiganj, however, said the guards could not discharge their responsibilities properly as they were anxious about their future.


   A lcoal trader of Shantinagar near the Sangrampunji BDR camp at Tambil, said the guards could not work properly for which goods smuggling increased.
   According to sources in the Bangladesh Rifles, officials of the Sylhet sector headquarters are not so active in overseeing the activities of border guards in frontiers.


   Operation officer of the 21 Rifles Battalion under the Sylhet sector headquarters, Major Benjir, however, claimed their supervision of the border situation and efforts to curb smuggling remained normal.
   The correspondent in Jessore said the solders at the Benapole check post were performing their duties anxiously being panicked about their future.
   A number of Benapole port policemen said the border guards were panicked about being arrested, although the guards doing their duties in the frontiers were not involved in the rebellion.


   The BDR soldiers said they were worried about their job as the government initiated a move to restructure the Bangladesh Riles.
   A soldier on guard near the border said, 'We have noting to do, but to hope that what the government does may be good for us.'
   Another soldier said, 'What can we expect but that the government should not do anything to the soldiers who were not involved in the rebellion?'
   There are 13 BDR outposts along the Benapole border where about 80 solders perform their duties.


   A labour leader of the area told New Age all the BDR soldiers along the border were panicked about their future.
   The correspondent in Lalmonirhat said almost all of the soldiers on guard along the border of the district had expressed their dissatisfaction at BDR reorganisation.
   Some solders of the Moghalhat outpost camp in Lalmonirhat seemed worried. A soldier said they were not satisfied at the reorganisation of the Bangladesh Rifles.


   Some soldiers at the Durgapur outpost camp at Aditmari and Baniyatari said they were facing problems in border villages after the rebellion as the local residents insulted them.
   Change in name, uniform, moto and logo of the Bangladesh Rifles will only add to the insult of the soldiers, they said

 

http://www.newagebd .com/2009/ may/24/front. html





__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?



Why you have to be so rude like hell? Do you think you become somebody just by talking like street corner mastans? What kind of tree you are that your fruits, you think, are  so valuable? They may be quite stinky; and in  fact be just the useless bursts of ignorant zealots. When you deal with the real issue, it gets acceptance. When you sporadically become a bully, it becomes intolerant and so people starts spitting on you. Kapish Vaya? Sorry. 
 


To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: bidrohee@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:48:28 -0700
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?



Dear Cyrus,

Do you need to declare what you are? As the well known legal maxim "Res Ipsa Loquitur" (or "the thing speaks for itself") signifies, your identity is more than proven through your stand and statement. I'm sure you know the Bangla proverb as well  "বৃক্ষ তোমার নাম কি, ফলে পরিচয়" Therefore, no matter whether you declare or hide your political affiliation/identity and loyalty to any country, your defense position well establishes what you are and where you come from without any doubt. Regards. Wohid



From: Cyrus <thoughtocrat@yahoo.com>
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 8:48:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Re: Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?

Dear Mahbub:
 
It is sad that like rest of your group, you accuse anyone who picks rationality and actual facts as Indian stooges. Unlike Munshi et.al. I don't take my talking points from either India or Pakistan, or BNP or BAL. If I were so inclined to support India or RAW, then I wouldn't be talking against them all the time, would I? Refer to my previous posts, and you will see how I detest both RAW and ISI agents who use my country, our country, as a proxy war field. My problem is that the Munshi cabal keep drumming up fears about RAW, while conveniently covering up numerous covert operations by ISI. Perhaps you should grow a pro-Bangladeshi bent and lecture the Munshi cabal to start giving credible facts. Perhaps then, you can come back with your self-righteousness and ask me or anyone not to be "blind".
 
I am, and have always been pro-Bangladesh. Are you?
 
Cyrus


From: M M R <mole_engineer@ yahoo.com>
To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:25:12 AM
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Re: Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?

TO Cyrus,
 
Your voice is same what India says (Pakistan is doing proxy war from Bangladesh). I just want to say, dont be blind. ISI is trying to prove that Independence of Bangladesh from Pakistan was wrong. But RAW is really doing very bad for Bangladesh. Raw is trying to show Bangladesh a Terrorist country, failed country, and also trying to block all of developments.
 
You saw that ISI giving arms and money to ULFA and others, why haven't looked on that RAW is providing moral, financial, stratigical, political, and millitary support to Bongosena, Shantibahini, and so other terrorist groups who are active inside and outside Bangladesh.
 
Finally. ISI and RAW both are trying to emolish our honor and pride.
 
Be a Pro-Bangladeshi, not Pro-Indian and Pro-Pakistani.
 
Mahmud 


--- On Thu, 5/21/09, Cyrus <thoughtocrat@ yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Cyrus <thoughtocrat@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Re: Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?
To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com
Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 11:00 AM

Do you have any access to the intelligence community in Bangladesh? or Indian or Pakistani intelligence community with credible intelligence reports? Do you have any credible evidence to suggest that RAW staged the BDR massacre and that RAW undermines Islam and Bangladesh? Or did you just pull that out of your pseudo-intellectual Paki defense forum? Fortunately, I do have access to the Bangladeshi intelligence community, and I know how ridiculous your doctrine and your comments are. Unfortunately, I cannot disclose my sources and can only write here after filtering information.
 
There is a difference between conspiracy theory and factual analysis. I doubt that you understand the difference. RAW may be involved in insurgency, but so is ISI who fights a proxy war against India, supplying weapons and rations to Indian insurgents from ULFA and Nagaland militants. I guess you missed out on that intelligence report or an "intelligent analysis", huh? It's fun to fight against a big bad wolf that is India, like the Americans did against the USSR. This kind of nonsense has rallied up young Muslim men in your fatherland, Pakistan, and in Bangladesh as if their faith and freedom are in great jeopardy. More have died to fight the big bad wolf, and the "intellectuals" like yourself have sat there and propagated their "doctrines". Personally, I find no difference between you guys and the reactionary BJP "intellectuals" like Bal Thackery, Advani, et. al.
 
Neoconservative thinking, protectionist views, and conspiracy theories have no place in this century of information. Bengali or Bangladeshi Nationalism is a failed idea, and looks like your version of Islamic Nationalism is on the rise. Hopefully, people will see through the garbage and judge for themselves.
 
Good luck fighting the big bad wolf.
 
Cyrus


From: M.B.I. Munshi <MBIMunshi@gmail. com>
To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 4:12:26 AM
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Re: Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?


That is absolutely incorrect. For the last six years I have been drawing attention to the fact that these so called Islamist terrorists were able to obtain entry into India and procure military grade weapons and explosives for use here. There is every likelihood that these groups are creations of RAW to undermine Islam and Bangladesh. This is not at all absurd since we know that RAW will sink to any depths to achieve their objectives. The BDR mutiny and the recent Lahore attacks were all RAW operations. The army report indicated that Torab Ali (a DD at BDR) had been making mobile calls outside the country. This was almost certainly to India. Please read my book The India Doctrine (1947-2007) which relies on books, research and strategy papers, intelligence reports and articles to substantiate the claims on Indian subversive tactics. The book is available at The Bookworm for anyone who is interested.

--- In alochona@yahoogroup s.com, "musasarkar" <m_musa92870@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> Mr. Wohid,
>
> What I wanted to say is what MBI Munshi writes now, later turns out to
> be untrue. May Allah give you enough intelligence to understand that.









Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out!

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [ALOCHONA] Govt prefers political appointment in key missions



This shouldn't be a surprise. In every country, including the U.S., diplomatic positions and positions involving foreign relations are almost always political. Why do you think BNP government sent incompetent third-class diplomats to their NY visa office? The appointees knew someone who knew someone and did a lot of foot work for the former government. Soon, BAL government would follow, and replace the BNP govt. appointees, and then send their incompetent ones to diplomatic missions worldwide.
 
Back in the days, these positions used to be based on meritocracy. Now, it's all about nepotism and who you know. Knowledge of foreign affairs, or ability to show courtesy to your own countrymen is not necessary.
 
C


From: J.A. Chowdhury <Chwdhury@hotmail.com>
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 9:35:55 PM
Subject: RE: [ALOCHONA] Govt prefers political appointment in key missions

It is not acceptable but in the same time BNP Jamaati diplomats should remove immidiately.
 


To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com
From: ezajur.rahman@ q8.com
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:59:50 +0300
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Govt prefers political appointment in key missions



Govt prefers political appointment in key missions
Courtesy New Age 24/5/09

The Awami League-led government seems to prefer contractual appointment on political considerations in key Bangladesh missions abroad such as the United States, India and the United Kingdom rather than sending career diplomats there.
   Such political appointments in strategically important missions, foreign policy experts said, may create resentment among the diplomats who have dreamt of such postings throughout their career.
   The government has already decided to send former Bangladesh ambassador to the United States Tariq A Karim to India and former Rahshahi University vice-chancellor Saidur Rahman Khan to London as high commissioners on a contractual basis.
   The government is also set to appoint Syed Muazzem Ali as Bangldesh's ambassador to the United States.
   Former ambassadors close to the government, however, feel there is nothing wrong with contractual appointments as the countries of assignment give importance to the ambassadors who are 'close to top government leaders.'
   Sources in the government told New Age the government wanted to begin with a rejuvenated team to attain extended goals of the ruling party's domestic policies and to fulfil the people's expectations reflected in the electoral mandate.
   'Our ambassadors and high commissioners must act as alter egos of the head of the government. Those people [persons made heads of missions] must reflect the state policy and programme to get better access to their designated destinations,' Mostafa Faruque Mohammad, a former high commissioner in New Delhi, told New Age on Saturday.
   Mostafa Faruque, also a member on the parliamentary committee on foreign affairs ministry, said such assignments these days were economic as well as political jobs and therefore people need to have expertise and experience.
   A former senior diplomat said career diplomats could serve better than politically appointed people because of their expertise in related jobs.
   'It is not guaranteed that a people having a good political contact with the government serves better than a diplomat,' he said. 'Such appointments outside the service may create frustration among serving diplomats waiting for such posting.'
   Referring to Bangladesh's previous posting in New Delhi, the diplomat said four, out of the 10, high commissioners including Faruq A Choudhury, Farooq Sobhan, CM Shafi Shami and Hemayetuddin later worked as foreign secretaries.
   He said working in strategically important missions give them a chance to prepare themselves for the post of top diplomat of the country.
   The government has also already appointed Saiful Haque, an expatriate Bangladeshi businessman in Russia, as the country's ambassador in Moscow, replacing Mohamed Mijarul Quayes, who is considered a candidate for the post of foreign secretary.
   The government is also set to appoint Abul Barakat, an economist and teacher of Dhaka University, as head of the Bangladesh's permanent mission in Geneva, former Bangladesh high commissioner in London Giasuddin as ambassador to Germany, Dhaka University teacher Neem Chandra Bhoumik as ambassador in Kathmandu, Abahani Limited director Shahed Reja, also a close friend to the late Sheikh Kamal, as ambassador in Kuwait and the finance minister's younger brother Abul Momen as ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

 





See all the ways you can stay connected to friends and family



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] NYT - Bangla life in the New York

Irony - <<He weighs his goats on a scale built for pigs, an animal that Islam proscribes as food. A pig decoration on the scale had been scratched out.>>


May 25, 2009
Meeting, Then Eating, the Goat
By ANNE BARNARD
New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/25/nyregion/25slaughter.html?em=&pagewanted=print

From the street, the shop could be mistaken for a bodega, but its red-and-yellow awning advertises live poultry, goats, lamb and beef. Scores of chickens flutter in cages. A dozen placid goats stare from a pen at customers from Bangladesh, Trinidad and Colombia. A worker slices the throats of Rhode Island Reds, uttering a prayer each time, according to the rites of Islam.

A block away from this tiny slaughterhouse, Jamaica Archer Live Poultry, which is housed in a former auto-body shop, commuters and students pour from buses and subways into the commercial hub of Jamaica, Queens, where tourists catch the train to Kennedy Airport. A few blocks the other way stand rows of frame houses and postage-stamp yards that make Jamaica look like any blue-collar American suburb.

In the Jamaica shop, where custom-slaughtered beef is sold for $3.50 a pound, there is not much mention of the "locavore" movement, which prizes eating locally grown food and knowing how it is produced, and whose Greenwich Village mecca, Blue Hill restaurant, serves a plate of grass-fed lamb and fiddlehead ferns for $36.

Yet the shop's owner, Muhammad Ali, is part of a growing immigrant-driven market that has taken root in cities but is reviving a practice dating back to America's agrarian past: seeing the live animal that will soon become your meal.

"I like to see it fresh and choose what I want," said Mitchella Christian, a native of Trinidad who was visiting L. Alladin, a nearby competitor of Mr. Ali's market, to buy a lamb and three chickens.

The lucky cow that escaped another slaughterhouse in Jamaica this month was only the tip of the horn. There are about 90 live-poultry markets in the metropolitan area. That number has doubled since the mid-1990s, state officials say, because of the demands of immigrants from countries where eyeballing your meat while it is alive is considered common sense. About a quarter of the markets are also licensed to slaughter larger livestock.

New York has probably the country's highest concentration of live-animal markets, though there are pockets in New Jersey, New England, Philadelphia, California and the Midwest, said Susan Trock, a veterinarian who manages poultry health inspections for the State Department of Agriculture and Markets.

Tom Mylan, who carves up cows in front of customers at Marlow & Daughters, a butcher shop and locavore's temple in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, said he lived near three live-animal markets, two run by Hasidic Jews and one by Latin Americans. Although they may not share his obsession with animal welfare and organic feed, he said, he views them as allies against the mass-market industry he calls "big meat."

What he teaches his gourmet followers, he said, is what the working-class live-market customers have never forgotten: "To eat meat, you have to kill — something that we got pulled out of during the last 50 years in America," he said. "We're used to going into the grocery store and there's not even a butcher counter, just a bunch of foam trays with a lot of anonymous blobs of meat in them."

Perhaps inevitably, when it comes to killing animals for food, immigrant Queens clashes with suburban-homeowning Queens: Some of the people who worry about factory-produced meat are unenthusiastic about having mom-and-pop abattoirs next door.

Last year, residents of St. Albans, Queens, blocked a small slaughterhouse from opening on Farmers Boulevard. One resident, Marie Wilkerson, told The New York Times that she feared its stink would ruin backyard barbecues. Their state legislators pushed through a law barring new slaughterhouses within 1,500 feet of a residence for four years, effectively freezing the expansion of slaughterhouses in most of the city.

Complaints about slaughterhouses often fall among local, federal and state regulators, said City Councilman Peter F. Vallone Jr. of Astoria, Queens, where a fleeing cow made headlines in 2000. "It's a complete maze," he said.

The rules are so confusing that officials at the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture initially told a reporter that their agency had nothing to do with live-animal markets.

But while retail poultry markets fall under state jurisdiction, if they sell goats, sheep or cows, the federal agency steps in.

There is inevitable potential for friction between the businesses' traditional values and the public-health priorities of the regulating agencies. Some market owners fear, apparently erroneously, that rules could interfere with religious rites. Others, when they dress a cow or a goat for a family to share on holidays, can run afoul of federal regulations requiring each animal to be custom-slaughtered for a specific buyer.

More-established market owners say that some new businesses skirt the rules or do not understand them.

Mr. Mylan, the Williamsburg shop owner, blames a big meat lobby that wants regulations that favor companies that kill thousands of animals a day. State and federal officials say they want the smaller businesses to thrive and are reaching out to help them comply.

Mr. Ali, meanwhile, says he is performing a much-needed service. Some come for the halal meat, killed according to Islam. (He weighs his goats on a scale built for pigs, an animal that Islam proscribes as food. A pig decoration on the scale had been scratched out.) But customers also want to see that the animals, usually trucked from no farther than Pennsylvania, are healthy.

"I want to see it with my own eyes," said Shamsul Rahman, 65, who is originally from Bangladesh and was buying 11 chickens.

After each chicken's throat was cut, the bird was placed upside down for the blood to drain. Then it was scalded and thrown into a machine that plucked its feathers with rubber mechanical fingers.

Nearby, an energetic goat placed its hooves on an iron rail and craned its neck toward a photographer like a supermodel flirting with the camera.

"He wants to make a connection with you," Mr. Ali said.

A few blocks away, F & D Live Poultry stands opposite the ultimate urban spot: the scene of the 50-shot killing of Sean Bell by police officers in 2006.

Inside the shop, Edelsa Angel, 27, who grew up on a Guatemalan farm, had brought her small son in his stroller. He watched with equanimity as chickens went into the killing room flapping and came out in plastic bags.

The owner, Joey Rosario, said the shop, just feet from a house, had been there for 100 years. But he is open to change: He plans to hire a halal slaughterer to keep up his market share as Muslims move in.

"I'm already talking to a guy," he said.


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: [ALOCHONA] Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?



 
        A Bangalee Jamaati salesman, who lives among treacherous Arabs, is parroting a few words of Latin, and lecturing on loyalty towards one's own country!
 
          What to make of such a character? The Qur'anul Karim helps us with the answer:
 
             From Surah At-Tawbah
 
[9:90] The Arabs made up excuses, and came to you seeking permission to stay behind. This is indicative of their rejection of GOD and His messenger - they stay behind. Indeed, those who disbelieve among them have incurred a painful retribution.

[9:97] The Arabs are the worst in disbelief and hypocrisy, and the most likely to ignore the laws that GOD has revealed to His messenger. GOD is Omniscient, Most Wise.

[9:98] Some Arabs consider their spending (in the cause of God) to be a loss, and even wait in anticipation that a disaster may hit you. It is they who will incur the worst disaster. GOD is Hearer, Omniscient.

[9:99] Other Arabs do believe in GOD and the Last Day, and consider their spending to be a means towards GOD, and a means of supporting the messenger. Indeed, it will bring them nearer; GOD will admit them into His mercy. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

[9:101] Among the Arabs around you, there are hypocrites. Also, among the city dwellers, there are those who are accustomed to hypocrisy. You do not know them, but we know them. We will double the retribution for them, then they end up committed to a terrible retribution.

[9:120] Neither the dwellers of the city, nor the Arabs around them, shall seek to stay behind the messenger of GOD (when he mobilizes for war). Nor shall they give priority to their own affairs over supporting him. This is because they do not suffer any thirst, or any effort, or hunger in the cause of GOD, or take a single step that enrages the disbelievers, or inflict any hardship upon the enemy, without having it written down for them as a credit. GOD never fails to recompense those who work righteousness.


               --- Farida Majid


To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
From: bidrohee@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:48:28 -0700
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?



Dear Cyrus,

Do you need to declare what you are? As the well known legal maxim "Res Ipsa Loquitur" (or "the thing speaks for itself") signifies, your identity is more than proven through your stand and statement. I'm sure you know the Bangla proverb as well  "বৃক্ষ তোমার নাম কি, ফলে পরিচয়" Therefore, no matter whether you declare or hide your political affiliation/identity and loyalty to any country, your defense position well establishes what you are and where you come from without any doubt. Regards. Wohid



From: Cyrus <thoughtocrat@yahoo.com>
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 8:48:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Re: Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?

Dear Mahbub:
 
It is sad that like rest of your group, you accuse anyone who picks rationality and actual facts as Indian stooges. Unlike Munshi et.al. I don't take my talking points from either India or Pakistan, or BNP or BAL. If I were so inclined to support India or RAW, then I wouldn't be talking against them all the time, would I? Refer to my previous posts, and you will see how I detest both RAW and ISI agents who use my country, our country, as a proxy war field. My problem is that the Munshi cabal keep drumming up fears about RAW, while conveniently covering up numerous covert operations by ISI. Perhaps you should grow a pro-Bangladeshi bent and lecture the Munshi cabal to start giving credible facts. Perhaps then, you can come back with your self-righteousness and ask me or anyone not to be "blind".
 
I am, and have always been pro-Bangladesh. Are you?
 
Cyrus


From: M M R <mole_engineer@ yahoo.com>
To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:25:12 AM
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Re: Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?

TO Cyrus,
 
Your voice is same what India says (Pakistan is doing proxy war from Bangladesh). I just want to say, dont be blind. ISI is trying to prove that Independence of Bangladesh from Pakistan was wrong. But RAW is really doing very bad for Bangladesh. Raw is trying to show Bangladesh a Terrorist country, failed country, and also trying to block all of developments.
 
You saw that ISI giving arms and money to ULFA and others, why haven't looked on that RAW is providing moral, financial, stratigical, political, and millitary support to Bongosena, Shantibahini, and so other terrorist groups who are active inside and outside Bangladesh.
 
Finally. ISI and RAW both are trying to emolish our honor and pride.
 
Be a Pro-Bangladeshi, not Pro-Indian and Pro-Pakistani.
 
Mahmud 


--- On Thu, 5/21/09, Cyrus <thoughtocrat@ yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Cyrus <thoughtocrat@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Re: Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?
To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com
Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 11:00 AM

Do you have any access to the intelligence community in Bangladesh? or Indian or Pakistani intelligence community with credible intelligence reports? Do you have any credible evidence to suggest that RAW staged the BDR massacre and that RAW undermines Islam and Bangladesh? Or did you just pull that out of your pseudo-intellectual Paki defense forum? Fortunately, I do have access to the Bangladeshi intelligence community, and I know how ridiculous your doctrine and your comments are. Unfortunately, I cannot disclose my sources and can only write here after filtering information.
 
There is a difference between conspiracy theory and factual analysis. I doubt that you understand the difference. RAW may be involved in insurgency, but so is ISI who fights a proxy war against India, supplying weapons and rations to Indian insurgents from ULFA and Nagaland militants. I guess you missed out on that intelligence report or an "intelligent analysis", huh? It's fun to fight against a big bad wolf that is India, like the Americans did against the USSR. This kind of nonsense has rallied up young Muslim men in your fatherland, Pakistan, and in Bangladesh as if their faith and freedom are in great jeopardy. More have died to fight the big bad wolf, and the "intellectuals" like yourself have sat there and propagated their "doctrines". Personally, I find no difference between you guys and the reactionary BJP "intellectuals" like Bal Thackery, Advani, et. al.
 
Neoconservative thinking, protectionist views, and conspiracy theories have no place in this century of information. Bengali or Bangladeshi Nationalism is a failed idea, and looks like your version of Islamic Nationalism is on the rise. Hopefully, people will see through the garbage and judge for themselves.
 
Good luck fighting the big bad wolf.
 
Cyrus


From: M.B.I. Munshi <MBIMunshi@gmail. com>
To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 4:12:26 AM
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Re: Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?


That is absolutely incorrect. For the last six years I have been drawing attention to the fact that these so called Islamist terrorists were able to obtain entry into India and procure military grade weapons and explosives for use here. There is every likelihood that these groups are creations of RAW to undermine Islam and Bangladesh. This is not at all absurd since we know that RAW will sink to any depths to achieve their objectives. The BDR mutiny and the recent Lahore attacks were all RAW operations. The army report indicated that Torab Ali (a DD at BDR) had been making mobile calls outside the country. This was almost certainly to India. Please read my book The India Doctrine (1947-2007) which relies on books, research and strategy papers, intelligence reports and articles to substantiate the claims on Indian subversive tactics. The book is available at The Bookworm for anyone who is interested.

--- In alochona@yahoogroup s.com, "musasarkar" <m_musa92870@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> Mr. Wohid,
>
> What I wanted to say is what MBI Munshi writes now, later turns out to
> be untrue. May Allah give you enough intelligence to understand that.









Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don't worry about storage limits. Check it out.

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Saudis to concentrate hiring of labourers (possible implications for BD workers)

Saudis to concentrate hiring of labourers
Caryle Murphy, Foreign Correspondent
The National, UAE
http://www.thenational.ae/article/20090525/FOREIGN/705249889/1002

Last Updated: May 24. 2009 9:42PM UAE / May 24. 2009 5:42PM GMT RIYADH // The Saudi government is drafting proposals to change how unskilled foreign workers are recruited and trained for work in the kingdom, but has no plans to drop the country's decades-old sponsorship system, senior officials say.

The proposals – still being finalised by the ministry of labour – call for a new system of privately run recruiting companies to replace what are now hundreds of smaller, less-regulated agencies, Abdul Wahid K al Humaid, the deputy labour minister, said in an interview.
The new companies will have to meet strict standards set by the ministry, and it is hoped that, because of their size, they will deliver improved services to both employers and employees, he said.

Instead of "a tiny office in a tiny street", there will be "companies with huge capital" that are "very well organised with branches all over the kingdom and in the sending countries", Mr al Humaid said.

Employers, he added, will continue to be the official "sponsor" of their employees once the worker is hired.

The specific categories of unskilled labour to be covered by the new system have not yet been disclosed, so it is unclear how sweeping the new system will be. It appears that individual employers will still be able to recruit professional, highly skilled workers directly from their home countries, or from existing recruiting agencies, although such agencies will eventually be phased out.

The labour minister, Ghazi al Gosaiby, recently told local reporters the government "has no intention for now of modifying the work system in the kingdom as is the case in Bahrain", which this month became the first Gulf state to scrap the so-called "kafala" system for foreign workers.

Comparing it to "the system of slavery", the Bahraini labour minister, Majeed al Alawi, announced that starting on Aug 1 his government instead would issue two-year work permits, and that workers would no longer have to be sponsored by a Bahraini citizen or get their employers' permission to change jobs.

Meanwhile, in a separate development, Saudi Arabia's Shura Council has almost completed a review of new regulations to govern the relationship between domestic workers and their employers, according to Fahhad bin Muetad al Hamad, chairman of the council's human resources development committee.

The regulations, proposed by the labour ministry, will cover such things as working hours, days off and salary payment deadlines for maids, drivers and gardeners. Of the kingdom's eight million foreign workers, 1.2 million are domestic workers, Mr al Hamad said.

Saudi Arabia has come under intense international criticism from human rights groups for its treatment of household staffers, especially maids. At the same time, Saudis often complain that after paying to bring someone from a foreign country to work here, the employee runs away to seek a better-paying job in the underground labour market.

The new rules are aimed at ensuring "that each side knows its rights and obligations", Mr al Hamad said. The council debate on the proposed rules "was one of the hottest discussions" he had seen in his five years in the state-appointed advisory body, he said.

He expects the regulations, which will be translated into foreign languages, to be implemented within a year. Both free-market economists and human rights groups have pressed for an end to Saudi Arabia's kafala system, which the private consulting firm McKinsey and Co once likened to "a system of indentured employment".

In a 2007 report on labour markets in Gulf states, the firm said that by guaranteeing cheap labour, the system depresses wages for everyone, thus discouraging nationals from entering the workplace. A report by the Riyadh Economic Forum in Dec 2007 said foreigners account for 76 per cent of the country's total workforce.

One Riyadh businessman, Turki F al Rasheed, said the business community generally likes the current system because it assures them of cheap labour that is totally at their mercy.

Migrant workers must surrender their passports to their employers, whose permission is needed to change jobs or leave the country.
"Why would I hire a Saudi when I can hire a Bangladeshi for 500 riyals [Dh490] a month and he'll work from 8 am til 11 o'clock at night?" Mr al Rasheed asked.

Saying that the proposal for new recruiting companies "will not work", he added he favours abolishing the kafala system and having the ministry of labour issue work visas to foreign workers and set minimum wages.

"All the businessmen want to throw hot tea in my face when I talk like this," he joked, adding in a serious tone: "We cannot go on like this; we have millions of Saudis unemployed."

Human rights activists want the system dumped because it facilitates exploitation of migrant workers. In an 80-page report on the sponsorship system last year, the National Society for Human Rights, a Saudi non-governmental organisation, assailed it for "practices that go against the teachings of Islamic Sharia".

Hussein al Shareef, the society's representative in Mecca said in an interview that details of the government's proposed changes are not clear yet. But, he added, "we are afraid it just transfers sponsorship from individuals to companies".

The deputy labour minister, Mr al Humaid, said the new recruiting companies – whose number has not yet been determined – would provide "two types of services". First, they would supply expatriate labour to businesses "in a much, much more organised fashion" than now because they will have computer databases with workers' names and nationalities and "training centres" in the countries where labourers are recruited.

Secondly, "these companies will have their own employees to be hired out temporarily". In those cases, the companies will be the employees' sponsor.

Although the new recruiting companies appear to be an attempt to curtail employer abuses by inserting a third party that will be required to observe certain standards, one member of the Shura Council, Osama al Kurdi, said he was sceptical of the government's idea.

"I don't see how larger companies will do any better than these small companies," he said, adding that they may even "create a monopoly".

"The only way to go is to completely revise the sponsorship law."

Attempts to get comments from the chambers of commerce in Jeddah and Riyadh were unsuccessful; officials at those organisations did not return phone calls or reply to e-mails.

cmurphy@thenational.ae

------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/